Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes among percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with AngioJet, Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and a combination of both. METHODS: One hundred forty nine patients with acute or sub-acute iliac-femoral vein thrombosis accepting CDT and/or PMT were divided into three groups respectively: PMT group, CDT group, PMT + CDT group (PMT followed by CDT). The severity of thrombosis was evaluated by venographic scoring system. Technical success was defined as restored patent deep venous blood flow after CDT and/or PMT. Clinical follow-up were assessed by ultrasound or venography imaging. The primary endpoints were recurrence of DVT, and severity level of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) during the follow-up. RESULTS: Technical success and immediate clinical improvements were achieved on all patients. The proportion of sub-acute DVT and the venographic scoring in PMT + CDT group were significantly higher than that in CDT group and PMT group (proportion of sub-acute DVT: p = 0.032 and p = 0.005, respectively; venographic scoring: p < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of May-Thurner Syndrome was lower in PMT group than that in CDT and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.005, respectively). The proportion of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis was significantly higher in CDT group than that in PMT + CDT group (p = 0.04). The severity of PTS was the highest in CDT group ( χ2 = 14.459, p = 0.006) compared to PMT group (p = 0.029) and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Patients with sub-acute DVT, high SVS scoring and combined May-Thurner Syndrome were recommended to take PMT + CDT treatment and might have lower rate of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis and severe PTS. Our study provided evidence detailing of PMT + CDT therapy.

Symptomatic occlusion of the inferior vena cava and bilateral iliac veins due to malignant seminoma: Percutaneous recanalization, thrombectomy, and stenting to restore patency.

Testicular seminoma is rarely associated with occlusive venous thrombosis. Several investigators describe percutaneous guidewire recanalization for iliofemoral vein thrombosis; however, this technique is ill-documented for occlusion of the inferior vena cava, and even less information is available on managing pervasive iliocaval obstruction. Furthermore, there is limited data on percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for malignancy-induced venous thrombosis. We present a case of symptomatic chronic occlusion of the inferior vena cava and iliac veins following remission for metastatic seminoma, with percutaneous intervention necessitating a unique combination of sharp wire recanalization, mechanical thrombectomy, and stenting to restore iliocaval patency.

Directional Femoral Ultrasound-Guided Compression Technique Using in Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the early results of directional femoral ultrasound-guided compression technique (UCT) using in percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Consecutive single-center patients with acute iliofemoral DVT who underwent PMT from January 2020 to December 2021 were included. Directional femoral UCT was used to adjust the PMT catheter into the residual thrombus in the inguinal region by ultrasound compression to improve the thrombus clearance rate. Patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups based on PMT with or without directional femoral UCT. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) at 24-month follow-up. The secondary efficacy outcomes included common femoral venous thrombus removal grade, total thrombus removal grade, venous primary patency rate, and incidence of moderate-to-severe PTS at 24-month follow-up. The safety outcomes included complications, major bleeding events, and death at 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included in the study: 42 patients underwent PMT with directional femoral UCT and 54 patients underwent PMT without UCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The percentages of patients achieved common femoral venous thrombus removal grade 3 and total thrombus removal grade 3 were significantly higher in the PMT with UCT group than those in the PMT without UCT group (p<0.001). The 24-month primary patency rate was significantly higher in the PMT with UCT group than that in the PMT without UCT group (90.0% vs 71.2%, p=0.027). The incidence of PTS was significantly lower in the PMT with UCT group (10.0%) than that in the PMT without UCT group (28.8%) (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: PMT with directional femoral UCT could improve the thrombus clearance rate and primary patency rate of acute iliofemoral DVT and might decrease the incidence of PTS compared to traditional PMT treatment without UCT. CLINICAL IMPACT: Residual thrombus in common femoral vein is a difficult problem associated with higher incidence of PTS. Few studies have focused on common femoral venous thrombus clearance. PMT with directional femoral UCT could improve the thrombus clearance rate and primary patency rate of acute iliofemoral DVT, and might decrease the incidence of PTS compared to traditional PMT treatment without UCT. Directional femoral UCT is recommended in PMT treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT.

Antegrade and retrograde approaches with a mechanical thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of antegrade and retrograde approaches with the AngioJet thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and to evaluate the necessity of filter placement. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with acute lower limb DVT treated with the AngioJet device from January 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the antegrade and retrograde treatment groups according to the surgical approach and the direction of valve opening. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter, incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), thrombectomy effectiveness, venous obstruction rate, and thrombosis recurrence rate of each treatment group were evaluated. In addition, factors affecting patency were analyzed. RESULTS: AngioJet was employed for 84 patients with acute lower limb DVT, treating a total of 88 limbs. The thrombosis interception rate of the filter was 35.7% (30 patients). The incidence of new PE or PE exacerbation was 6.0% (5 patients), and a filter retrieval rate of 97.6% (82 patients) was detected. Thrombus removal of grade III occurred in 35 (64.8%) of the 54 limbs (61.4%) in the antegrade treatment group, versus 13 (38.2%) of the 34 limbs (38.6%) in the retrograde treatment group (P<0.05). At 3 months, venous patency and bleeding events involved 52 (96.3%) and 4 (7.4%) limbs in the antegrade treatment group, respectively, versus 29 (85.3%) and 2 (5.9%) in the retrograde treatment group, respectively (P>0.05). Regression analysis was performed to determine factors that may affect 3-month patency in both groups. Statistically significant linear relationships were found between 3-month patency and thrombus removal rate [OR=0.546 (0.326, 0.916)], thrombus formation time [OR=1.018 (1.002, 1.036)], and preoperative thrombosis score [OR=1.012 (1.002, 1.022)] in the antegrade treatment group, as well as thrombus removal rate [0.473 (0.229, 0.977)] in the retrograde treatment group. In regression analysis of factors affecting patency in both groups and VCSS/Villalta score, a statistically significant linear relationship was found between thrombus formation time and VCSS score in the antegrade treatment group [0.576 (0.467, 0.710)]. CONCLUSION: Both antegrade and retrograde approaches are safe and effective for the treatment of acute lower limb DVT. There are no differences in 3-month deep vein patency and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence rates. Individuals with acute lower limb DVT are at high risk of thrombus shedding after treatment with AngioJet thrombectomy, and placement of a vena cava filter (VCF) is recommended for effective interception.

Renal Vein Thrombosis Secondary to Pyelonephritis: Targeting a Thrombo-Inflammatory Entity.

Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) is a relatively uncommon condition that is most frequently observed in individuals with nephrotic syndrome. While rare, pyelonephritis (PN) may serve as a predisposing factor for secondary RVT. In such cases, one should consider the possibility of RVT when patients fail to respond to appropriate antibiotic treatment. Typically, these patients require additional anticoagulation therapy for a duration of 3 to 6 months, with a generally favorable prognosis. In this report, we present the case of a 74-year-old female who developed RVT due to Klebsiella pneumoniae PN. Additionally, we reviewed 11 cases of PN complicated by RVT, which were documented in the PubMed database over a span of 40 years, emphasizing key elements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Lastly, we elaborated upon the role of thrombo-inflammation, especially in the context of sepsis.

Retrograde pedal access and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for salvage of an occluded vein bypass.

Managing occlusions in a lower extremity bypass is challenging, although several surgical methods and percutaneous devices are available for treatment. A 64-year-old man presented with subacute failure of his infrainguinal vein bypass. Because we were unable to access the bypass in an antegrade fashion, we accessed the bypass graft via retrograde pedal access. The occluded vein graft was salvaged with the Pounce percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system (Surmodics) with the use of a 0.014-in. through and through buddy wire to maintain access in the bypass alongside the Pounce system to allow multiple passes of the nitinol baskets to retrieve thrombus.

In-hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with cancer admitted for pulmonary embolism treated with or without catheter-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBT) are novel reperfusion options for PE though data in patients with cancer is lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE were identified using the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2017 to 2020. Primary outcome were in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital bleeding, 90-day readmission for venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related or right heart failure-related reasons and bleeding. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression and inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT as well as CBT versus systemic thrombolysis. RESULTS: A total of 7785 patients were included (2511 with high-risk PE) of whom 1045 (13.4%) were managed with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower rates of index hospitalization death (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96) and 90-day readmission (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81) but higher rates of in-hospital bleeding (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20) which was predominantly post-procedural bleeding. CBT was associated with lower risk of major bleeding (20.8% vs 24.8%; OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94) compared with systemic thrombolysis. INTERPRETATION: Among patients with cancer with intermediate or high-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. CBT was also associated with decreased risk of index hospitalization major bleeding compared with systemic thrombolysis. Prospective, randomized trials with inclusion of patients with cancer are needed to confirm these findings.

Catheter-based therapy for high-risk or intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: death and re-hospitalization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been developed as a treatment option in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). There remains a paucity of data to inform decision-making in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE. The aim of this study was to characterize in-hospital and readmission outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE treated with vs. without CBT in a large retrospective registry. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE were identified using the 2017-20 National Readmission Database. In-hospital outcomes included death and bleeding and 30- and 90-day readmission outcomes including all-cause, venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related and bleeding-related readmissions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT. RESULTS: A total of 14 903 [2076 (13.9%) with CBT] and 42 829 [8824 (20.6%) with CBT] patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk PE were included, respectively. Prior to IPTW, patients with CBT were younger and less likely to have cancer and cardiac arrest, receive systemic thrombolysis, or be on mechanical ventilation. In the IPTW logistic regression model, CBT was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death in high-risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.87] and intermediate-risk PE (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83). Patients with high-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83] and VTE (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.63) readmission. Patients with intermediate-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) and VTE (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76) readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk or intermediate-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Treatment outcomes in patients with acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to investigate the treatment outcomes of acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (ATOS) and identify prognostic factors after treatment. METHODS: The clinical data of 62 patients with ATOS between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by the treatment strategy, complications and mortality were compared in different group. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients were identified with ATOS. The median patient age was 69 years (interquartile range 58-79 years). Endovascular therapy was initiated in 21 patients, and 4 patients received conservative treatment. Open surgery was performed first in the remaining 37 patients. The technical success rates of the endovascular first group and open surgery group were 90.5% and 97.3%, respectively. One patient in the conservative treatment group had progression of ischemia to extensive bowel necrosis. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between these groups. Predictors of 30-day mortality included initial neutrophil count > 12* 103/dL, age over 60 years old and history of chronic renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment or conservative treatment may be adopted in selected patients who do not exhibit signs and symptoms of bowel necrosis, and close monitoring for bowel necrosis is important. The increase in preoperative neutrophil count, age over 60 years old and history of chronic renal insufficiency were poor prognostic factors.

The Below-the-Knee Approach to Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre, Single-Arm Study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) through a below-the-knee (BTK) approach for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: A retrospective review of DVT patients treated with PMT by the BTK approach at our center from April 2022 to August 2023 was performed. Their preoperative demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outpatient outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (67% men; mean age, 63 years) met the inclusion criteria. The BTK approach was successfully achieved in all patients through the posterior tibial vein (n = 1), anterior tibial vein (n = 2), and peroneal vein (n = 9). PMTs were achieved in 11 (92%) patients. Successful lysis (grade II and grade III lysis) was achieved in all patients with PMT. Four (33%) patients had residual venous occlusion over the popliteal vein. No intraoperative complications or bleeding events occurred in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: PMT via BTK puncture seems to be a safe and effective approach for treating lower extremity DVT. It is reserved for highly select patients with a low risk of bleeding and is performed at centers that have experience with this procedure.

AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy coupled with dose-reduced rt-PA for massive inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: A single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) coupled with dose-reduced rt-PA, compared to catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone, for the treatment of massive inferior vena cava filter (IVCF)-related thrombosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who received either ART or CDT alone as the first-line endovascular therapy (ET) between January, 2016 and September, 2022. The data on demographics, clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 40 included patients, 24 received ART and 16 received CDT alone. The demographics, presentation, lesion characteristics, comorbidities and risk factors were comparable (all p > .05). Technical success rates were 100% in both groups. The total CDT time and infusion agent dosage were lower in the ART group than those in the CDT group (both p < .05). At the end of CDT, clinical success was 81.8% in the ART group, which was slightly higher than that of 70.8% in the CDT group (p > .05). At the 6-month follow-up, the incidences of recurrent thrombosis in the two groups were 6.9% and 15.8%, respectively, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was 10.3% and 21.1%, respectively. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). No major complications were noted in either group, ART seemed to have slightly higher risk of transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria and recoverable acute kidney injury, but with a lower minor bleeding incidence when compared with CDT alone (4.2 vs. 31.3%, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ART or CDT alone as the first-line ET for IVCF-related thrombosis has comparable outcomes but with different adverse event profiles. Both modalities are safe and effective in patients with massive IVCF-related thrombosis.

Single-center experience with the ClotTriever BOLD catheter for deep vein thrombosis percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of the lower extremity.

Background: The ClotTriever System is a percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system used to treat deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The BOLD catheter is a newer compatible component with a modified coring element for which reported outcomes are limited. This retrospective study aims to assess the preliminary procedural safety and success data for patients treated with the BOLD catheter. Methods: All consecutive patients with symptomatic lower extremity DVT who underwent thrombectomy with the BOLD catheter between 23 November 2021 and 26 June 2022 at a single center were included. Baseline and procedural characteristics were reported. The primary outcome, intraprocedural safety, was assessed by a chart review of recorded intraprocedural adverse events (AEs) or device malfunction. The secondary outcome, procedural success, was defined as ≥75% reduction in the total occlusion across treated venous segments. This was assessed by an interventionalist review of pre- and postprocedural venograms. Additional outcomes included length of postprocedural hospital stay and assessment of AEs at discharge and a 30-day follow-up visit. Results: Eleven patient cases were reviewed. The median patient age was 65 years, the majority were women, and all were treated unilaterally. All procedures were completed in a single session without intraprocedural AEs or device malfunction. The median procedural blood loss was 50 ml. A review of pre- and postprocedural venograms showed that 35 venous segments were treated, including the femoral (n = 9), common femoral (n = 9), external iliac (n = 10), and common iliac (n = 7) veins. Procedural success was achieved in 10 patients (90.9%), and the median reduction rate in venous occlusion was 100%. The median length of postprocedural hospital stay was 1 day, and no AEs were noted at discharge (N = 11). One adverse event occurred among the eight patients who completed their follow-up visit. A patient with advanced-stage cancer and medication failure had a recurrent DVT 13 days postprocedure, which was not related to the device or procedure. Conclusions: No safety concerns concerning the BOLD catheter were raised during the review of the cases included in this analysis, and the device was successful in reducing venous occlusion in patients with symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT.

Paradoxical Shock and Management of a Post-percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Device in a Morbidly Obese Patient With a Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.

A submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a type of PE where the pulmonary artery is partially obstructed. It is categorized as an intermediate risk when compared to massive PE, which presents as a complete obstruction of the pulmonary artery, therefore placing it in the high-risk category. In either case, if not promptly assessed and treated, it can prove to be fatal. We report the case of a morbidly obese middle-aged female who presented with a submassive PE. Based on the evaluation of the patient's pre-existing conditions, risk factors, clinical severity, imaging, and lab findings, it was concluded that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) was essential to promptly alleviate the clot burden. Following the procedure, it was observed that the patient became hemodynamically unstable, accompanied by hypoxemia and respiratory acidosis. With the assistance of pressors and later the placement of a right ventricular Impella device, the patient was successfully stabilized and, several days later, discharged from the hospital. This report explores the potential factors that may have contributed to the patient's hemodynamic instability and acute right ventricular failure after the PMT procedure. These factors can be attributed to pre-existing changes in the right ventricle (RV) as a result of morbid obesity, as well as possible associations with obstructive sleep apnea or obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that patients exhibiting submassive PE can be considered suitable candidates for PMT, with careful consideration of the patient's medical history, clinical severity of symptoms, and diagnostic findings. It is worth noting that PMT intervention in this patient demonstrated a favorable outcome.

[Clinical Comparison of the Efficacy of Systemic Thrombolysis,Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis,and AngioJet Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis].

Objective To compare the clinical effects of three treatment methods including systemic thrombolysis(ST),catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT),and AngioJet percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy(PMT)in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis(LEDVT). Methods The data of 82 patients diagnosed with LEDVT in the Department of Vascular and Gland Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from January 2017 to December 2020 were collected.The patients were assigned into a ST group(n=50),a CDT group(n=16),and a PMT group(n=16)according to different treatment methods.The efficacy and safety were compared among the three groups. Results Compared with that before treatment,the circumferential diameter difference of both lower limbs on days 1,2,and 3 of treatment in the ST,CDT,and PMT groups reduced(all P<0.001).The PMT group showed smaller circumferential diameter difference of lower limbs on days 1,2,and 3 of treatment than the ST group(all P<0.001)and smaller circumferential diameter difference of the lower patellar margin on day 1 of treatment than the CDT group(P<0.001).The PMT group showed higher diminution rate for swelling of the affected limb at the upper and lower edges of the patella than the ST group(P<0.001)and higher diminution rate for swelling at the upper edge of the patella than the CDT group(P=0.026).The incidence of complications after treatment showed no significant differences among the three groups(all P>0.05).The median of hospital stay in the PMT group was shorter than that in the ST and CDT groups(P=0.002,P=0.001).The PMT group had higher thrombus clearance rate than the ST group(P=0.002)and no significant difference in the thrombus clearance rate from the CDT group(P=0.361).The vascular recanalization rates in the PMT(all P<0.001)and CDT(P<0.001,P=0.002,P=0.009)groups 3,6,and 12 months after treatment were higher than those in ST group,and there were no significant differences between PMT and CDT groups(P=0.341,P=0.210,P=0.341). Conclusions ST,CDT,and PMT demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of LEDVT,and PMT was superior to ST and CDT in terms of circumferential diameter difference of the lower limbs,diminution rate for swelling of the affected limb,thrombus clearance rate,length of hospital stay,and long-term vascular recanalization.There was no obvious difference in safety among the three therapies.

A Rare Case of Stroke as a Complication After Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism and Patent Foramen Ovale.

We present an extremely rare case of a patient with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, complicated with stroke as a form of paradoxical embolism through a previously unknown patent foramen ovale. We reviewed the literature for indications, efficacy, and safety of this procedure, as well as for experience on this technique in patients with patent foramen ovale. LEARNING POINTS: Some authors propose percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy as an aggressive treatment of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism.Pending clinical trials, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy seems to reduce right ventricle overload in these patients, with rare adverse effects.To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of stroke as a complication of the procedure. These patients should be screened for patent foramen ovale before the procedure.

Use of Autotransfusion following Percutaneous Thrombectomy for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Pulmonary Embolism in a Single Session-A Case Report.

A 64-year-old male patient was admitted to the catheterization laboratory with a suspected myocardial infarction and in cardiogenic shock. Upon further investigation, a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism with signs of right heart dysfunction was discovered, leading to a decision to perform a direct interventional treatment with a thrombectomy device for thrombus aspiration. The procedure was successful in removing almost the entirety of the thrombotic material from the pulmonary arteries. The patient's hemodynamics stabilized and oxygenation improved instantly. The procedure required a total of 18 aspiration cycles. Each aspiration contained approx. 60 mL blood amounting to a total of approx. 1080 mL of blood. During the procedure, a mechanical blood salvage system was used to resupply 50% of the blood via autotransfusion that would otherwise have been lost. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for post-interventional care and monitoring. A CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries after the procedure confirmed the presence of only minor residual thrombotic material. The patient's clinical, ECG, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters returned to normal or near normal ranges. The patient was discharged shortly after in stable conditions on oral anticoagulation.

Endovascular Therapies Using Catheter-Based Thrombectomy or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Non-Cancer Associated Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of catheter-based therapy (CBT) compared to conventional catheter-directed thrombosis (CDT) for non-oncological patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT), as well to evaluate the differences between CBTs using AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) and large lumen catheter aspiration (LLCA). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included eligible patients with IVCT treated with CBTs coupled with/without CDT or CDT alone as the first-line treatment between January 3, 2015 and January 28, 2022. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were all reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (128 limbs) were included, with 42 cases were treated with ART, 30 with LLCA, and 34 with CDT alone. Technical success rates were 100% (128/128), and 95.5% (84/88) limbs treated with CBT subsequently underwent CDT. The mean duration of CDT time and total infusion agent dosage in patients with CBTs were lower than those who underwent CDT alone (P < .05). Similarities were observed in ART compared to LLCA (P < .05). At the end of CDT, clinical success was achieved in 85.2% (75/88) of limbs treated with CBTs and 77.5% (31/40) of limbs with CDT alone, and 88.5% (46/52) in ART and 80.6% (29/36) in LLCA. The 12-month follow-up showed slightly lower incidences of recurrent thrombosis (7.7% vs 15.2%) and post-thrombotic syndrome (14.1% vs 21.2%), which persisted in patients who underwent ART compared to LLCA (4.3% vs 12.9% and 8.5% vs 22.6%). Patients who underwent CBTs tended to have lower minor complications (5.6% vs 17.6%) but were at higher risk of transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria (58.3% vs 0%) and recoverable acute kidney injury (11.1% vs 2.9%) compared to CDT alone. These findings were similar in ART compared to LLCA (2.4% vs 10.0%, 100% vs 0%, and 16.7% vs 3.3%, respectively). LLCA seemed to have more hemoglobin losses (10.50 ± 9.20 vs 5.57 ± 10. 42 g/L, P < .05). CONCLUSION: CBTs coupled with/without CDT are safe and effective in patients with IVCT, reducing the clot burden in a moderate time, restoring blood flow rapidly, minimizing thrombolytic drug requirement and lowering minor bleeding complication compared to CDT alone. ART and LLCA have comparable outcomes but with different adverse event profiles.

Influence of the 4G/5G polymorphism of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene in acute unprovoked deep vein thrombosis and residual vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is an important inhibitor of plasminogen activator, but the role of the PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been contradictory. In this study, we investigated the distribution of the PAI-1 4G/5G genotype in Chinese patients with DVT compared with healthy controls and the association between the PAI-1 4G/5G genotype and the persistence of residual venous occlusion (RVO) after different treatments. METHODS: The PAI-1 4G/5G genotype was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 108 patients with unprovoked DVT and 108 healthy controls. The patients with DVT were treated with catheter-based therapy or anticoagulation only. RVO was assessed by duplex sonography during the follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (29.6%) were homozygous for 4G (4G/4G), 62 patients (57.4%) were heterozygous for 4G/5G, and 14 patients (13%) were homozygous for 5G (5G/5G). No significant difference in genotype frequency was found between patients with DVT and controls. A total of 86 patients completed follow-up of ultrasound examination with a mean follow-up of 13.4 ±7.2 months. The results of patients with RVO were significantly different between homozygous 4G carriers (76.9%), heterozygous 4G/5G (58.3%), and homozygous carriers of 5G (33.3%) (P <.05) at the end of follow-up. Catheter-based therapy showed a better result in patients who were noncarriers of 4G (P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: The PAI-1 4G/5G genotype was not a relevant predictor for DVT in Chinese patients, but is a risk factor for persistent RVO after idiopathic DVT.

Rheolytic thrombectomy using an AngioJet ZelanteDVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for patients with proximal vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) using an AngioJet Zelante DVT catheter or a Solent Omni catheter for acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients who were treated with an AngioJet RT between January 2019 and January 2021, and then the patients were divided into the ZelanteDVT group (n = 17) and the Solent group (n = 23). Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were analysed. RESULTS: No significant differences regarding demographics were detected (all p > .05). The technical success rates were both 100%. The ZelanteDVT group had a shorter duration of RT and a higher primary RT success than the Solent group (all p < .05), and the percentage of adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) was 29.4% in the ZelanteDVT group, which was significantly lower than the 73.9% in the Solent group (p = .010). The clinical success rates for the ZelanteDVT group and Solent group were 100% (17/17) and 95.7% (22/23), respectively, and these values were high in the two groups (p > .05). Apart from transient macroscopic haemoglobinuria occurring in all the patients during the first 24 hours post-RT, none of the patients in either group suffered other procedure-related adverse events or major complications. Minor complications included bleeding events in 21.7% (5/23) of the patients in the Solent group and one (5.9%) patient in the ZelanteDVT group (p > .05). At 6 months, the frequency of PTS was 5.9% (1/17) in the ZelanteDVT group and 17.4% (4/23) in the Solent group (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Both catheters are safe and effective in managing patients with proximal DVT, thus leading to improved clinical outcomes with few complications. The ZelanteDVT catheter was more effective than the Solent catheter in thrombectomy, thus allowing for faster extraction of the DVT with a shorter run time and lower proportions of patients with adjunctive CDT.

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for limb graft occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair: Results of a case series.

OBJECTIVE: Limb graft occlusion (LGO) is a recognised complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We present outcomes of a case series of LGO treated by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT). METHODS: Six male patients (mean age 70.5 ± 7.5 years) presented with LGO after EVAR (n = 4), fenestrated EVAR with an iliac branch device (n = 1), branched EVAR (n = 1). Median time to occlusion was 28.5(IQR 90) weeks; all occlusions were unilateral. The presenting symptom was intermittent claudication (n = 4), chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (n = 1) or acute limb ischaemia (n = 1). PMT was undertaken using the 10F Rotarex Rotational Excisional Atherectomy System (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, USA) with optional stenting/reline of the affected limb. RESULTS: LGO was cleared in all 6 cases by PMT with limb stenting (n = 4)/limb reline (n = 2)/outflow stenting (n = 2). Post-operatively, novel oral anticoagulant therapy supplemented prior antiplatelet therapy in all cases. Length of stay was 2 (IQR 19) days. All cleared limbs remain patent at median 15 (IQR 185) weeks follow-up. CONCLUSION: This case series indicates that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy is associated with high technical success rates and subsequent acceptable ensuing short-to-midterm patency. This approach is a valid alternative to surgical interventions in such cases, and represents our primary approach when LGO is encountered after EVAR.