Optimal assessment share structured of Pharmacoeconomics for medical drugs according to minimax criterion

Objective: To develop a comprehensive methodology for the optimal assessment of the share of the use of medicines, based on the procedure for ranking drugs according to the pharmacoeconomic point scale and the minimax criterion was applied. Methods: The author’s approach is based on the minimax principle and allows solving the problem of optimizing the pharma drug portfolio based on available data, without the need to obtain the parameters of the Markowitz model associated with correlation analysis of data. Results: The authors obtained the optimal distribution of medicines in group A, B: 37% to 63%, which the authors consider a promising recommendation for a pharmaceutical company. The use of a similar approach, which does not contradict the Markowitz methodology, but allows us to reasonably accept the parameters of the model and give the optimal solution for the share distribution of drugs in medical practice. Conclusion: These mathematical tools, justified and equipped with an alternative confirmation, the minimax task can and should take a significant place in the complex pharma-analytical methodology of the management of large companies supplying concomitant drugs to the Russian and foreign market. (AU)

Assessment of Extent and Quality of Pharmacoeconomic Studies in India Using Quality of Health Economic Studies Score: A Targeted Literature Review.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the quality of pharmacoeconomic studies conducted in India to report key areas of focus on the findings from the reviewed studies. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted using well-defined search strategy in PubMed to identify economic studies conducted in India from May 2017 to April 2022. Only economic evaluation studies were included, whereas trial-based cost analyses were excluded. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies tool, which comprised 16 evaluation criteria related to objectives, source, funding, perspective, subgroup analysis, scales, and economic modeling related parameters. Based on scores (100 points), studies were rated as good (≥75), fair (50-74), and poor (≤49) quality. RESULTS: Search strategy provided 888 studies; 95 of these were economic studies, and 74 were included in the analysis. These 74 studies included budget impact analysis (n = 4), burden of illness (n = 8), cost-benefit analysis (n = 5), cost-consequences analysis (n = 1), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 55), and cost-utility analysis (n = 1). The average quality score of studies was 64.08. Of the studies, 15 studies were rated as "good," 51 "fair," and 8 "poor." It was observed that primary outcome measures, stating negative outcomes, reporting bias, and implementing statistical and sensitivity analysis significantly affected the quality score. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the health economic studies conducted in India are of fair quality, and there is a need for standardization of guidelines and increase in number of Indian peer-reviewed health economics journals. A collaborative effort from pharma companies, policy makers, education experts, curriculum planners, and medical faculty is needed to promote quality economic studies.

Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analysis of antihypertensive drugs in South Indian population: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Global evidence-based recommendations for hypertension management are periodically updated, and ensuring adherence to the guidelines is imperative. Furthermore, the current high prevalence of hypertension effectuates a high health-care cost. Purpose: To evaluate the prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs and other factors affecting blood pressure (BP) with the objective of assessing the proportion of patients achieving the target BP and to perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a South Indian population. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 650 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension and already on treatment with one or more drugs were included. A prospective interview of patients was done using a prevalidated questionnaire on various factors in BP control. Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analyses, namely, cost acquisition, cost of illness, and cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out. Results: Of 650 subjects, 257 (39.54%) achieved the target BP, while 393 (60.46%) did not. A significant association of age, occupational status, monthly family income, and area of residence in addition to physical activity and diet scores, with achieving target BP was noted. A significantly higher cost of anti-hypertensive drug treatment in achieving target BP (P = 0.02) was observed. Among patients who achieved target BP, 37.35% were on monotherapy and 48.25% on multiple drug therapy compared to 46.31% and 35.62%, respectively, in patients who did not. Average cost-effectiveness ratio were found to be Rs. 20.45 and Rs. 57.27, respectively, for single and multiple drug therapies, with incremental cost-effectiveness of Rs. 194.14 per additional patient treated with multiple free drug combinations. Conclusion: This study identified the anti-hypertensive prescribing pattern and provided insight into the various pharmacoeconomic factors that play a significant role in attaining target BP in the treated population.

[Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the tixagevimab and cilgavimab combination using for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19].

AIM: To evaluate pharmacoeconomic feasibility using of the tixagevimab and cilgavimab combination for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in persons ≥12 years old who weigh ≥40 kg and have either a history of allergy that prevents their vaccination against COVID-19 or moderate or immunocompromised was assessed based on PROVENT phase III study results. The quantity of life years or quality-adjusted life years gained was calculated. Direct medical cost associated with prophylaxis of COVID-19, treatment of infected patients and those experiencing long COVID post infection were assessed. Results were compared with wiliness-to-pay threshold, measured as tripled gross domestic product per capita and equal to 2.69 mln RUB in 2022. RESULTS: Pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 results in additional 0.0287 life years or 0.0247 quality-adjusted life years. The cost of additional life year gained is equal to 1.12 mln RUB, the cost of additional quality-adjusted life years is 1.30 mln RUB. Both costs of additional life year and cost of quality-adjusted life years appeared to be significantly less compared to wiliness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSION: Pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 with combination of tixagevimab and cilgavimab is economically feasible and may be recommended for wide use in Russian healthcare system.

Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of rituximab and traditional tacrolimus regimens in membranous nephropathy in China.

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets CD20 and is frequently used in the treatment of membranous nephropathy (MN). Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of RTX in treating MN in practice and a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the RTX and traditional tacrolimus (TAC) regimens can provide valuable insights to aid decision-making by the government and relevant medical insurance departments. Methods: We conducted a statistical analysis of medical records from patients diagnosed with MN who underwent RTX treatment between 1 January 2019 and 1 January 2023. The TAC data were obtained from the clinical literature. The efficacy rates and incidence of adverse effects (AEs) were calculated to compare the efficacy and safety of RTX and TAC. Based on the patient's disease status, we developed a Markov model to compare the total cost, remission rate, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two regimens. Both univariate and probability sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the stability of the developed model. Results: The RTX group enrolled 53 patients with MN, and the 12-month overall efficacy rate was not significantly different from that of the TAC group with 35 patients (86.79% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.0131); however, the relapse rate was significantly lower in the RTX group (3.77% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.016). The RTX group demonstrated no severe AEs (SAEs), while the TAC group demonstrated six cases of SAEs, including 4 cases of severe pneumonia, 1 case of lung abscess and 1 case of interstitial lung disease, accounting for 7.89% of traditional tacrolimus-treated patients. The baseline analysis results revealed that over a 5-year post-treatment period, RTX increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.058 and costs by ¥7,341. Assuming three times the 2022 domestic gross domestic product as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold per QALY, the ICER of RTX compared to TAC was ¥124,631.14/QALY, which is less than the WTP threshold of ¥257,094/QALY, indicating that RTX treatment is approximately two times more cost-effective compared to TAC. Conclusion: The current analysis indicates that despite the expensive unit price of RTX, it remains a cost-effective treatment option for MN compared to TAC.

A Cost-Variation Analysis of Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Management of Diabetic Nephropathy.

Background Diabetic nephropathy is associated with polypharmacy and increased out-of-pocket expenditure for the patients. Multiple brands of each prescribed drug are available in the market. Hence, there is a need to evaluate the cost variation of the available brands of prescribed drugs. Methodology All drugs prescribed to the 282 patients with diabetic nephropathy from our previous cross-sectional observational drug utilization study were included. Data regarding the cost of various brands of the prescribed drugs were obtained from Current Index of Medical Specialities (CIMS) android application version 3.1.2 and Indian online pharmacies. The percentage price variation and cost ratio for these drugs were determined. A correlation analysis was conducted between the number of brands and percentage price variation. Results A high percentage price variation (>1,000%) and cost ratio (>10) was observed for 19 out of 39 drugs that were evaluated. The highest price variations were seen with amlodipine (16,799%), metformin (11,240%), and glimepiride (10,525%). The highest cost ratios were seen with amlodipine (168), metformin (113.40%), and glimepiride (106.25%). There was a negligible correlation between the number of brands and percentage price variation. Conclusions The above findings indicate that drug price variations need to be monitored more strictly. The present study may aid physicians in understanding the degree of price variation among medications used for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, thereby necessitating the selection of a P-drug to increase the affordability of drugs for patients.

Economic evaluation of doravirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine for HIV-1-infected adults in Russia: a cost-minimization and budget impact analysis.

BACKGROUND: In Russia, before 2022, the list of vital and essential drugs for HIV-infected patients previously untreated with antiretroviral drugs included the fixed-dose combination rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (RPV/TDF/FTC) but not doravirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine (DOR/TDF/3TC). METHODS: An indirect comparison of the efficacy of DOR/TDF/3TC and RPV/TDF/FTC defined by virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies/mL at week 48) was made. The per-patient drug costs over 1 year were compared in a cost-minimization analysis. A budget impact analysis considered the costs to the healthcare system of including DOR/TDF/3TC as a treatment option for eligible patients in Russia over a 3-year time horizon. RESULTS: The indirect treatment comparison of DOR/TDF/3TC and RPV/TDF/FTC in treatment-naïve patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/ml or less showed no statistically significant difference (RR 0.914, 95% CI 0.833-1.003). In the cost-minimization analysis, the per-patient cost of one year of treatment with RPV/TDF/FTC and DOR/TDF/3TC was, respectively, ₽320,975 and ₽151,192, for a saving of ₽169,783. In the budget impact analysis, the adoption of DOR/TDF/3TC into clinical practice is expected to reduce drug costs by ₽333 million (23.8%) in year 3. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-dose combination DOR/TDF/3TC is equally effective and cost-saving compared to RPV/TDF/FTC from Russian vital and essential drugs list perspective.

Current Trends and Challenges in Pharmacoeconomic Aspects of Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Treatment.

Nanotherapy is a part of nanomedicine that involves nanoparticles as carriers to deliver drugs to target locations. This novel targeting approach has been found to resolve various problems, especially those associated with cancer treatment. In nanotherapy, the carrier plays a crucial role in handling many of the existing challenges, including drug protection before early-stage degradations of active substances, allowing them to reach targeted cells and overcome cell resistance mechanisms. The present review comprises the following sections: the first part presents the introduction of pharmacoeconomics as a branch of healthcare economics, the second part covers various beneficial aspects of the use of nanocarriers for in vitro, in vivo, and pre- and clinical studies, as well as discussion on drug resistance problem and present solutions to overcome it. In the third part, progress in drug manufacturing and optimization of the process of nanoparticle synthesis were discussed. Finally, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of nanoformulations due to up-to-date studies were summarized. In this review, the most recent developments in the field of nanotechnology's economic impact, particularly beneficial applications in medicine were presented. Primarily focus on cancer treatment, but also discussion on other fields of application, which are strongly associated with cancer epidemiology and treatment, was made. In addition, the current limitations of nanomedicine and its huge potential to improve and develop the health care system were presented.

[ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF THE DRUG SUPPLY STRATEGY FOR PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS C IN THE CITY OF MOSCOW].

Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various options for the supply of direct antiviral agents for patients with chronic viral hepatitis C. An analysis of the data of Moscow Department of Health on the drug supply of patients with chronic hepatitis C antiviral drugs at the expense of budgetary funds in Moscow was carried out. The direct medical costs of the urban healthcare system for the use of direct antiviral action drugs for the period from 2017 to 2019 were calculated. For the period from 2017 to 2019, 6,936 patients with chronic hepatitis C received medication with antiviral drugs at the expense of budget funds in Moscow. An increase in the number of patients compared to the base (2017) year was noted by 76%, as well as an increase in the volume of interferon-free antiviral therapy sets against the background of an increase in budget expenditures by 212%. The average level of cost for all sets with direct antiviral drugs amounted to 689,844 rub. The most commonly used set is Dac + Asu. The average cost of this set per patient treated as part of the first-line antiviral therapy was 58,899 rub. cheaper than a set of 3D, and 58,861 rub. more expensive than the Grz/Elb set, while the need for retreatment for the Dac + Asu set was 8.4%, and for the 3D, Grz/Elb and Gle/Pib sets, 0.58%, 0% and 0%, respectively. An even greater excess of the average was recorded for the Sof + Dac, Sof + Sim sets: which naturally entailed the excess of the costs of treating one patient with this distribution of treatment sets and financial resources by 253,236 rub. and 189,173 rub., respectively, which is 1.36 and 1, 27 times the average cost of all prices for antiviral treatment sets. Most often, re-medication was provided to patients who were initially provided with Sof set (33%), followed by Sim + Dac set (18.6%), 8.4% of re-medication cases were registered in patients who received Dac + Asu set as the first line of therapy. Budget costs for the second and subsequent sets of therapy increased by 92,739,115.30 rub.

A comparative study on erlotinib & gefitinib therapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients.

Background & objectives: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib and gefitinib are the first-generation EGFR-TKIs for patients with NSCLC. However, there is a paucity of studies comparing the effectiveness of these two drugs. Hence, this study was aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of erlotinib and gefitinib in NSCLC patients. Methods: This study included 71 NSCLC patients who received EGFR-TKIs between 2013 and 2016. Adverse drug reaction of both erlotinib (n=37) and gefitinib (n=34) was determined and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading system. Effectiveness was measured using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours and progression-free survival (PFS). Pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed by cost-effective analysis. Results: When comparing safety profile, both the drugs had similar adverse events except for dermal side effects such as acneiform eruption (51.4%), rash (54.05%) and mucositis (59.5%) for erlotinib and 20.6, 26.5 and 29.4 per cent for gefitinib, respectively. The PFS of the two drugs was compared to differentiate the effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib. There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the two drugs. The pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that gefitinib was more cost-effective than erlotinib. Interpretation & conclusions: This study showed that erlotinib and gefitinib had similar effectiveness but gefitinib had a better safety profile compared to erlotinib. Therefore, gefitinib could be considered a better option for NSCLC patients compared to erlotinib. However, further studies need to be done with a large sample to confirm these findings.

Patterns of practice and pharmacoeconomic analysis of the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Greece--the CRISIS study. A retrospective analysis by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG).

Background:Metastatic RCC (mRCC) treatment has been revolutionized with 11 approved targeted agents. We report patterns of practice, outcomes and pharmacoeconomic analyses after the introduction of targeted therapy. Patients and methods: CRISIS was a retrospective multicenter study of mRCCpatients who received targeted therapy . Results were related to the start of 1st-line therapy, with a cut off at 1 January 2011 in order to depict the impact of increased availability of effective options. Results: 164 patients, were included. 70.1% and 44.5% received 2nd and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. More patients were treated in 2nd-line after 1 January 2011. After a median follow-up of 55.1 months, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.7 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 8.3-13.7), 7.3 (95% CI: 5.1-8.6), 5.8 (95% CI: 3.8-7.8) and 34 (95% CI: 28.5-39.8), 22.4 (95% CI: 16-32.1), 18.3 (95% CI: 12.4-26.4) months for first, second and third line, respectively. Efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in 1st-line were similar. The mean total cost/patient was 35,012.2 Euros (standard deviation [SD]: 28,971.5). Conclusions: Our study confirms previous real-world data suggesting that continuing advances in the treatment of mRCC produce favorable outcomes in everyday practice. Pharmacoeconomic analyses are important for cost-effective utilization of emerging novel therapies.

Economic Comparison of Serologic and Molecular Screening Strategies for Hepatitis C Virus.

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is traditionally performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and HCV infection is confirmed by measuring the viral load using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). An alternative screening approach is to use only PCR, without the ELISA pretest. Methods: We compared the cost ratio of screening for HCV using 2 approaches: (1) ELISA followed by PCR testing, and (2) PCR testing alone. The results were analyzed using a decision analysis model. A sensitivity analysis and a threshold analysis were performed by varying both the prevalence of HCV infection (to encompass populations in which viral infection is overrepresented) as well as the costs of PCR testing. Results: Under baseline assumptions, the costs of PCR testing alone were substantially greater than the combination of ELISA and PCR testing. The cost per patient screened using combination testing was $42.30, whereas testing with only PCR cost $200.00 per patient. The prevalence of HCV had a greater impact on the cost ratio than did the costs of laboratory tests. The use of PCR testing alone became less costly only when the prevalence of HCV infection was greater than 69.5%. Otherwise, the costs of the 2 approaches were similar when the cost of PCR was 1% of that of ELISA. Conclusion: From a pharmacoeconomic basis, the current approach of HCV screening (ie, using ELISA and PCR testing) was found to be the less expensive screening strategy in a general US population and for most cohorts in which HCV infection was noted to be overrepresented. Screening for HCV is less costly using solely PCR testing only when the prevalence of HCV infection is greater than 69.5%.

Evaluation of the Involvement of Pharmacists in Diabetes Self-Care: A Review From the Economic Perspective.

Objectives: To analyze the studies encompassing the involvement of pharmacists in diabetes self-care. Method: We reviewed studies conducted from 2005 to 2017 on the involvement of pharmacists in diabetes self-care. The keywords mainly used in this search are pharmacoeconomic analysis, diabetes self-care, pharmacist involvement,cost-effectiveness analysis, cost of utilization, cost of illness, cost of minimization and cost-benefit analysis. PubMed, Science Direct, Springer Link and Medline searched for the relevant studies. These databases searched for full text articles ranging from 2007 to 2017. We tried to limit the search with the inclusion of studies having any sort of pharmacoeconomically relevant component. Key Findings: Cost of illness varied among the countries in managing diabetes mellitus, and the cost of managing diabetes complications were twice the cost of management of diabetes. Continuous involvement of the pharmacist in primary health care is a cost-effective strategy and pronounced to be essential for helping diabetes patient in controlling and managing their disease. Implementation of diabetes self-care by pharmacists such as lifestyle intervention rendered improved quality of life of patient without any increase in health care cost. Self-care management generates intensive blood glucose control and improved quality of life. Conclusions: Implementation of diabetic self-care intervention including intensive lifestyle intervention, education, self-monitoring of blood glucose and adherence toward medication-initiated reduction in the overall healthcare cost of diabetic patients compared to patients relying on only any one of the interventions. Impact of diabetes self-care intervention by pharmacist reported to significantly reduce the HbA1C levels of diabetic patients along with the reduction of yearly healthcare cost. This review showed that pharmacist involvement in diabetes self-care interventions prove to be cost-effective and can significantly affect the condition of the diabetic patients and reduces the risk of complications.

Economic evaluation of paliperidone palmitate once monthly for treating chronic schizophrenia patients in the United Arab Emirates.

OBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia is one of the most debilitating diseases in the United Arab Emirates. Oral antipsychotics (OA) are commonly used in terms of pharmacotherapy; however, these treatments can be rendered ineffective by poor patient adherence. Paliperidone palmitate once monthly (PP1M) is a long acting antipsychotic which can offer an adherence advantage when compared to oral treatments. The study objective is to estimate the cost effectiveness of PP1M in the UAE setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 1-year validated decision-tree model was adapted to the UAE setting using published literature and expert opinion. Patients on PP1M were compared with or without oral supplementation to patients on any oral antipsychotic. Patient outcomes studied were incremental cost per quality adjusted life years gained, incremental cost per hospitalizations, relapses, and emergency room visits averted. RESULTS: After 1 year, patients on PP1M monotherapy when compared to oral antipsychotics had better outcomes (0.840 vs 0.811 QALYs; 31 relapse days averted as well as 9 and 24 percentage points of ER and hospitalizations averted, respectively), and better healthcare savings (AED 1405). PP1M economically dominated oral antipsychotics. The results were stable across a broad range of deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. PP1M plus oral antipsychotics could not be evaluated due to the absence of clinical data that would provide insight into the clinical value of combination therapy. CONCLUSION: PP1M is estimated to save the UAE healthcare system money, while at the same time improving patient outcomes.

Choosing Optimal Antifungal Agents To Prevent Fungal Infections in Nonneutropenic Critically Ill Patients: Trial Sequential Analysis, Network Meta-analysis, and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis.

The use of antifungal interventions in critically ill patients prior to invasive fungal infection (IFI) being microbiologically confirmed and the preferred drug are still controversial. A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared untargeted antifungal treatments applied to nonneutropenic critically ill patients. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and proven IFI rates. A random-effects model was used with trial sequential analyses (TSA), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to obtain indirect evidence, and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analytic model was completed from the patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. In total, 19 RCTs involving 2,556 patients (7 interventions) were included. Untargeted antifungal treatment did not significantly decrease the incidence of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.70 to 1.14), but it did reduce the incidence of proven IFI (OR = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.29 to 0.71) relative to placebo/no intervention. The TSA showed that there was sufficient evidence supporting these findings. In the NMA, the only significant difference found for both primary outcomes was between fluconazole and placebo/no intervention in preventing proven IFI (OR = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.19 to 0.65). Based on drug and hospital costs in China, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year saved for fluconazole, caspofungin, and micafungin relative to placebo/no intervention corresponded to US$889, US$9,994, and US$10,351, respectively. Untargeted antifungal treatment significantly reduced proven IFI rates in nonneutropenic critically ill patients but with no mortality benefits relative to placebo/no intervention. Among the well-tolerated antifungals, fluconazole remains the only one that is effective for IFI prevention and significantly cheaper than echinocandins.

Developing an Economic Case of Clinical Pharmacists' Interventions on Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Through Service Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become a huge health problem as well as a financial burden for the National Health Service. The objective of this study was to characterize current practice of VTE prophylaxis (VTEP) and evaluate the economic impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions (CPIs) on VTEP. METHODS: A prospective service evaluation was conducted in a medical and surgical ward at a tertiary teaching hospital in London from 23 May to 08 June 2016. Appropriateness of risk assessment (RA) and VTEP and CPIs were categorized and assessed. Based on the results of the service evaluation, a pharmacoeconomic analysis was undertaken to estimate the cost savings by CPIs for inappropriate pharmacological VTEP. FINDINGS: A total of 203 cases were analyzed. The rates of appropriateness for RA on admission, RA at 24 h and pharmacological VTEP were 58.6%, 39.7%, and 75.4%, respectively. In the medical ward, there was a significant difference of appropriate RAs between on admission and at 24 h (70.3% vs. 23.8%, respectively). Whereas, the rate of appropriate pharmacological VTEP accounted for 75.4% and the rate of appropriate prophylaxis was significantly higher in the medical ward than surgical ward (80.5% vs. 68.2%, P = 0.045). Of 50 cases of inappropriate pharmacological prophylaxis, 39 cases (78.0%) were corrected by clinical pharmacists. These CPIs resulted in £1,286.23 cost savings during the study and it was estimated to be £517,522/annum. CONCLUSION: CPIs had significant positive clinical and economic impacts on VTEP. There is more scope for the improvement of RA at 24 h through CPIs.

Cost-effectiveness of glaucoma management with monotherapy medications in Egypt.

Glaucoma is a serious chronic ophthalmic disease since it causes irreversible visual disability if untreated can lead to blindness. Treatment options include medications (classified into five major classes of drugs which are muscarinic cholinergic agonists, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, beta-1 adrenergic antagonists, prostaglandins [PGs], and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors); use of laser therapy or conventional surgery. Pharmacoeconomic analysis helps in choosing among this variety of treatments. There is a great need for such analysis in Egypt since undergoing of it in different countries or societies may produce different results. This work aimed to compare cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost 0.03% once daily versus brimonidine 0.2% twice daily and timolol 0.5% twice daily as monotherapy treatment in Egyptian patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Clinical data revealed that all treatments decreased intraocular pressure (IOP) significantly but bimatoprost 0.03% showed the highest efficacy (27.7% decrease in IOP from baseline), while timolol 0.5% reduced IOP by 22.5% then brimonidine 0.2% which decreased IOP by 20.8%. From the cost-effectiveness view, it would be preferable to initiate treatment with timolol in case of absence of any contraindications. PG analog can be used as add-on therapy in low responder patients or as alternative treatment in case of presence of contraindication to use of beta blockers.

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Pain Medications Used to Treat Adult Patients with Chronic Back Pain in the United States.

Chronic back pain is an extremely common health problem. The largest category for pain therapy costs includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. However, there has been limited evidence outlining their effectiveness in terms of quality of life for the treatment of chronic back pain. The authors performed a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of chronic back pain patients using NSAIDs versus those using opioids alone or combination opioid analgesics. This pharmacoeconomic evaluation was conducted using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Adults ≥18 years with chronic back pain diagnosis were included in the study. Individuals using opioids were matched in 1:1 ratio with those using only NSAIDs using propensity scores. All direct medical costs were included, and utility scores from Short Form 6D (SF-6D) were used to calculate QALYs (quality-adjusted life years). Monte Carlo probabilistic simulation technique was employed to determine the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. After matching, there were 1109 patients in each cohort. The total mean annual cost was found to be $6137.41 for NSAIDs and $8982.28 for opioids. The mean utility gain for NSAIDs was found to be 0.661, whereas for opioids it was 0.633. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at all willingness-to-pay thresholds, the probability of NSAIDs being cost-effective was higher than the probability of the opioids being cost-effective. The authors found NSAIDs to be a dominant strategy as compared with opioids. Considering the higher cost associated with opioids/combination opioid analgesics, it might be cost-effective if they are used in patients who did not respond to the NSAIDs.

Economic analysis of paliperidone long-acting injectable for chronic schizophrenia in Portugal.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic schizophrenia suffer a huge burden, as do their families/caregivers. Treating schizophrenia is costly for health systems. The European Medicines Agency has approved paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI; Xeplion), an atypical antipsychotic depot; however, its pharmacoeconomic profile in Portugal is unknown. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the viewpoint of the Portuguese National Health Service. METHODS: PP-LAI was compared with long acting injectables risperidone (RIS-LAI) and haloperidol (HAL-LAI) and oral drugs (olanzapine; oral-OLZ) adapting a 1-year decision tree to Portugal, guided by local experts. Clinical information and costs were obtained from literature sources and published lists. Outcomes included relapses (both requiring and not requiring hospitalization) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were expressed in 2014 euros. Economic outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs); including cost-utility (outcome = QALYs) and cost-effectiveness analyses (outcomes = relapse/hospitalization/emergency room (ER) visit avoided). RESULTS: The base-case cost of oral-OLZ was 4447€ (20% drugs/20% medical/60% hospital); HAL-LAI cost 4474€ (13% drugs/13% medical/74% hospital); PP-LAI cost 5326€ (49% drugs/12% medical/39% hospital); RIS-LAI cost 6223€ (44% drugs/12% medical/44% hospital). Respective QALYs/hospitalizations/ER visits were oral-OLZ: 0.761/0.615/0.242; HAL-LAI: 0.758/0.623/0.250; PP-LAI: 0.823/0.288/0.122; RIS-LAI: 0.799/0.394/0.168. HAL-LAI was dominated by oral-OLZ and RIS-LAI by PP-LAI for all outcomes. The ICER of PP-LAI over oral-OLZ was 14,247€/QALY, well below NICE/Portuguese thresholds (≈24,800€/30,000€/QALY). ICERs were 1973€/relapse avoided and 2697€/hospitalization avoided. Analyses were robust against most variations in input values, as PP-LAI was cost-effective over oral-OLZ in >99% of 10,000 simulations. CONCLUSION: In Portugal, PP-LAI dominated HAL-LAI and RIS-LAI and was cost-effective over oral-OLZ with respect to QALYs gained, relapses avoided, and hospitalizations avoided.

Cost-effectiveness of rituximab in addition to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The cost-effectiveness of rituximab in combination with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (R-FC) for the first line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was evaluated. Based on long-term clinical data (follow-up of 5.9 years) from the CLL8-trial, a Markov-model with three health states (Free from disease progression, Progressive disease, Death) was used to evaluate the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and cost per life years gained (LYG) of R-FC from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI). The addition of rituximab to FC chemotherapy results in a gain of 1.1 quality-adjusted life-years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of R-FC compared with FC was €17,979 per QALY (€15,773 per LYG). Results were robust in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. From the German SHI perspective, rituximab in combination with FC chemotherapy represents good value for first-line treatment of patients with CLL and compares favorably with chemotherapy alone.