DUPAN-II normalisation as a biological indicator during preoperative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Duke pancreatic mono-clonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) is a famous tumour maker for pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We evaluated the clinical implications of DUPAN-II levels as a biological indicator for PC during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 221 consecutive patients with resectable and borderline resectable PC at diagnosis who underwent preoperative CRT between 2008 and 2017. We focused on 73 patients with elevated pre-CRT DUPAN-II levels (> 230 U/mL; more than 1.5 times the cut-off value for the normal range). Pre- and post-CRT DUPAN-II levels and the changes in DUPAN-II ratio were measured. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified normalisation of DUPAN-II levels after CRT as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.06, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.24, p = 0.042). Total normalisation ratio was 49% (n = 36). Overall survival (OS) in patients with normalised DUPAN-II levels was significantly longer than that in 73 patients with elevated levels (5-year survival, 55% vs. 21%, p = 0.032) and in 60 patients who underwent tumour resection (5-year survival, 59% vs. 26%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Normalisation of DUPAN-II levels during preoperative CRT was a significant prognostic factor and could be an indicator to monitor treatment efficacy and predict patient prognosis.

Short-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the short-term results of preoperative chemoradiation therapy with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 32 patients with advanced rectal cancer who had been treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and underwent surgical resection between May 2012 and December 2019 were analyzed. Advanced rectal cancer of clinical stage II and III was diagnosed in 13 (41%) and 19 (59%) patients, respectively. Therapeutic toxicities of anemia (24 patients; 75%), anal pain (22 patients; 69%) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (19 patients; 59%) were frequently observed in all grades. Grade ≥3 leukopenia, anemia, neutrophil count reduction, platelet count reduction and diarrhea were identified in 2 (6%), 1 (3%), 1 (3%), 1 (3%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. A total of 29 patients (91%) completed this therapy without any change to the protocol or dosage. R0 resection was performed in 100% of the patients, and no postoperative mortality was observed. Pathological complete response was observed in 9 cases (28.1%). This therapy can be considered for cases of locally advanced rectal cancer due to its acceptable toxicity and relatively high antitumor effect.

Clinical implications of the serum CA19-9 level in "biological borderline resectability" and "biological downstaging" in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Biological factors are emphasized in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), and CA19-9 is an important factor for biological borderline resectability (b-BR). The aim of this study was to investigate the cut-off value of CA19-9 for biological borderline resectability and "biological downstaging" in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: A total of 407 patients with anatomically resectable PC (a-R) and BRPC (a-BR) received preoperative gemcitabine-based CRT. The b-BR was determined, according to the CA19-9 value prior to preoperative CRT (pre-CA19-9), as the subgroup of a-R cases in which the survival was comparable with that in a-BR cases. "Biological downstaging" was determined based on prognostic analyses regarding the CA19-9 value after preoperative CRT (post-CA19-9) in association with the survival of R cases (a-R cases without the b-BR factor). RESULTS: The 5-year survival of a-R patients with pre-CA19-9 > 120 U/mL was comparable with that of a-BR patients (44% vs 34%, p = 0.082). The survival of b-BR patients with post-CRT CA19-9 ≤ 37 U/mL (normalized) was comparably favorable with that of R patients (56% vs 65%, p = 0.369). The incidence of distant recurrence was higher in b-BR patients without post-CA19-9 normalization than in those with post-CA19-9 normalization (70% vs 50%, p = 0.003), while the incidence of local recurrence was comparable between these two groups (12% vs 13%, p = 0.986). CONCLUSIONS: Biological BRPC was determined to be an anatomically resectable disease with pre-CA19-9 > 120 U/mL, and post-CA19-9 normalization indicated "biological downstaging" in b-BR in the preoperative CRT strategy.

The Anatomical Pattern of the Proximal Jejunal Vein as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Pancreatic Head Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The significance of the anatomical variations of proximal jejunal vein [the so-called 1st jejunal vein (J1v)] has been reported from a technical standpoint. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the prognostic impact of the anatomical variations of J1v in the surgical treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 49 patients with resectable PC located in the uncinate process were included in this study. The J1v converging pattern was divided into 2 groups in terms of its relation to the SMA (i.e., the J1v status): i) group D: the J1v travels posterior to the SMA; ii) group V: the J1v travels anterior to the SMA. The associations between the J1v status and surgical outcome were assessed. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate after resection in group V (35%) was significantly lower than that in group D (70%) (p=0.029), and the J1v status of group V was the only independent negative prognostic factor (HR=5.49; 95% CI=1.69-19.3; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The J1v converging pattern is a significant prognostic variable in patients with PC located in the uncinate process: the J1v status of group V was significantly associated with impaired survival.

How to Achieve a Higher Pathologic Complete Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy.

The current standard of care for treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer includes preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) followed by a total mesorectal excision and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of these patients has achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) and they have shown improved disease-free and overall survival compared to non-pCR patients. Thus, many efforts have been made to achieve a higher pCR through PCRT. In this review, results from various ongoing and recently completed clinical trials that are being or have been conducted with an aim to improve tumor response by modifying therapy will be discussed.

How to Achieve a Higher Pathologic Complete Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

The current standard of care for treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer includes preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) followed by a total mesorectal excision and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of these patients has achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) and they have shown improved disease-free and overall survival compared to non-pCR patients. Thus, many efforts have been made to achieve a higher pCR through PCRT. In this review, results from various ongoing and recently completed clinical trials that are being or have been conducted with an aim to improve tumor response by modifying therapy will be discussed.

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy induces primary-tumor complete response more frequently than chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer: analyses of the National Cancer Database 2006-2014 using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of preoperative chemoradiation (CXRT) over preoperative chemotherapy alone ("chemotherapy" hereafter) is unknown. By analyzing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we investigated whether preoperative CXRT improves the incidence of primary tumor pathologic complete response (ypT0) and overall survival (OS) compared with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent CXRT or chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy were included. Propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1 was implemented to reduce selection bias. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compare incidences of ypT0 between groups, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare OS. RESULTS: We identified 8464 patients. Median patient age was 63 years; 76% were male and 79% were white. ypT0 was observed in 16.1% of patients in the CXRT group and 6.6% in the chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, a total of 2408 patients were matched. CXRT was associated with a higher incidence of ypT0 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.76-2.95; p < 0.0001) and higher frequency of R0 resection (92 vs. 86%; p < 0.001). However, CXRT was not associated with longer OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15; p = 0.63). Safety profiles (30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay) were equivalent between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of gastric cancer patients from the NCDB, CXRT was associated with a higher incidence of ypT0 and R0 resection compared with chemotherapy, although it was not associated with a longer OS.

Local excision for ypT2 rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation therapy: it should not be justified.

PURPOSE: Among individuals who respond well to preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for ypT0-1, local excision (LE) could provide acceptable oncological outcomes. However, in ypT2 cases, the oncological safety of LE has not been determined. This study aimed to compare oncological outcomes between LE and total mesorectal excision of ypT2-stage rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy and investigate the oncological safety of LE in these patients. METHODS: We included 351 patients who exhibited ypT2-stage rectal cancer after CRT followed by LE (n = 16 [5%]) or total mesorectal excision (TME) (n = 335 [95%]) after preoperative CRT between January 2007 and December 2013. After propensity matching, oncological outcomes between LE group and TME group were compared. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 57 months (range, 12-113 months). In the LE group, local recurrence occurred more frequently (18 vs. 4%; p = 0.034) but not distant metastases (12 vs. 11%; p = 0.690). The 5-year local recurrence-free (76 vs. 96%; p = 0.006), disease-free (64 vs. 84%; p = 0.075), and overall survival (79 vs. 93%; p = 0.045) rates of the LE group were significantly lower than those of the TME group. After propensity matching, 5-year local recurrence-free survival of the LE group was significantly lower than that of the TME group (76 vs. 97%, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: The high local failure rate and poor oncological outcomes for ypT2-stage rectal cancer patients who undergo CRT followed by LE cannot be justified as an indication for LE. Salvage surgery should be recommended in these patients.

MicroRNA-181b-5p, ETS1, and the c-Met pathway exacerbate the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radiation therapy.

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has emerged as a reasonable strategy that shows good prognostic impact. However, after preoperative CRT, resected specimens show remnant tumor cells, which indicate that some tumor cells had acquired or were selected for resistance to CRT. Recently, two oncological mechanisms, the EMT and the presence of CSCs, were reported to be associated with resistance in various cancers. Previous reports showed that HGF could induce EMT in PDAC cells; moreover, the HGF receptor, c-Met, was identified as a dominant pancreatic CSC marker. However, the clinical significance of c-Met expression remains unclear. So, we hypothesized that remnant PDAC tissue after CRT might harbor cells with high c-Met expression, and these cells may exacerbate patients' prognosis. In the immunohistochemical analysis, we showed that preoperative CRT was significantly associated with high c-Met expression; moreover, high c-Met expression was a significant marker of a dismal prognosis. Next, we investigated mechanisms of c-Met upregulation in PDAC cells. We established GEM-resistant and radioresistant PDAC cells to analyze the transcriptome involved in c-Met expression. The microarray data for the established radiation-resistant PDAC cells indicated miR-181b-5p downregulation, which targets ETS1, one of the transcription factors for c-Met, and it was shown that radiation exposure induced c-Met expression through ETS1 increase by the suppression of miR-181b-5p. These results suggested that targeting these mechanisms may promote the development of a novel multidisciplinary treatment strategy for improving preoperative CRT efficiency.

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy for upper gastric cancer：a retrospective study for its efficacy and safety / 中国肿瘤临床

Objective:To investigate the efficacy, safety, and overall survival of advanced upper gastric cancer patients who received preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Methods:A total of 62 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Beijing Cancer Hospital&Institute were retrospectively observed to determine the efficacy and safety and to perform survival analysis of preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Results:Results of the postoperative pathology showed that the number of patients with T4 and N3 stages was significantly lower in the preoperative chemoradiation therapy group than in the preoperative chemotherapy group (P<0.05). In addition, the differences between the two groups in terms of safety and toxicity were not significant (P≥0.05). Analysis also showed that the differences between the two groups in terms of survival were not significant (P≥0.05). Conclusion:Patients with advanced upper gastric cancer can gain a potential survival advantage from preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Compared with preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative chemoradiation therapy was performed without increased risk of toxicity and insecurity. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy can also improve the local control ratio, especial y the control ratio of lymphatic metastasis. However, the final results of survival analysis depend on long-term follow-up of patients.

Abdominoperineal Resection in the Treatment of Locally-advanced Low Rectal Cancer: Is Preoperative Chemoradiation Advantageous?

PURPOSE: An abdominoperineal resection (APR) has a poor prognosis. However, limited studies about the prognostic factors in APR and the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have been performed even though in rectal cancer, the application of preoperative CRT provides better local control compared to postoperative CRT. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors and the impact of preoperative CRT in patients who undergo an APR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with a total of 133 patients who underwent an APR, cT3, cT4, or cN(+) patients, for rectal cancer between January 1995 and October 2004. Fifty-one patients treated with preoperative CRT (Group 1) were compared with 82 APR patients treated with postoperative CRT (Group 2). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the clinicopathologic factors affecting the treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 61.2 mo (range 6 to 194 mo). Circumferential margin (CRM) involvement was significantly associated with local recurrence (LR) and with disease-free survival in APR patients (P<0.001, P=0.011). The 5-yr LR rate was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P=0.013) in the univariate analysis, but no difference was noted in multivariate analysis (P=0.315). In Group 1, CRM involvement, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis were significantly lower than they were in Group 2 (P=0.043, P=0.003, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: For achieving adequate oncologic outcomes in APR patients, an adequate CRM should be acquired with an optimal operation. In addition, preoperative CRT would be helpful for high-risk APR patients with a threatening CRM margin, providing the benefit of tumor downstaging.

The Effects of Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Pectal Cancer

To evaluate the effects of the preoperative chemoradiation therapy(CRT) for rectal cancer. 31 rectal cancer patients received preoperative CRT. A total 3060cGy of radiation was given in 3 weeks, 180cGy for a fraction. 425mg/m2/day of 5-FU and 20mg/m2/day of leucovorin were continuously infused in the first 5 days of the preoperative radiation therapy. A IV injection of Mitomycin C 10mg/m2 was given on the first day. A digital rectal examination, endoscopy with biopsy, barium enema, chest X-ray, hepatobiliary ultrasonography & IV bolus CT were done before and after CRT. Clinically, 19 patients(61.3%) and pathologically, 16 patients(51.6%) showed reduced tumor size. In 7 patients (22.6%), there was no residual tumor in the pathologic specimen. Digital rectal examination was possible in 23 patients. 16(69.5%) of them had a decrease in height of ulcer margin on digital rectal examination. Seven of the fifteen patients showed decreased perirectal fat tissue infiltration. There was no severe toxicity which might delay the curative surgery. In conclusion, preoperative chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer was very effective in reducing tumor size and perirectal fat tissue infiltration without considerable toxicity.