Relationship between adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Poor adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (Adh-OAD) is a risk factor for poor control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, it is necessary to quantify the Adh-OAD. This quantification is possible through electronic dispensing records from the community pharmacy. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the Adh-OAD on the control of T2DM and the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) in the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted in 8 community pharmacies in Granada (Spain). Patients older than 18 years with T2DM and on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) for at least 6 months were included. The main study variables were the control of T2DM, %HbA1c, and the Adh-OAD considering three cut-off points (≥80%, ≥70%, ≥60%). This relationship was studied using multivariate binary logistic regression and multivariate linear regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included. The mean age was 70.5 years (SD: 9.7), and 54.2% were men. Eighty-five patients (79.4%) had well-controlled T2DM (mean %HbA1c: 6.5%; SD=0.6). Considering Adh-OAD≥80%, 13.1% (n=14) had a poor adherence and was related to the %HbA1c (ß=0.742; p=0.007) and the control of T2DM (OR: 7.327; 95% CI: 1.302-41.241). Poor adherence was found in 9.3% (n=10) considering Adh-OAD≥70% and in 3.7% (n=4) considering Adh-OAD≥60%. In both cases, a statistically significant relationship was found between Adh-OAD and the %HbA1c and between Adh-OAD and the control of T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Adh-OAD influenced the %HbA1c in patients with T2DM and the control of their disease.

¿Recomendar la frecuencia de administración de medicamentos en la prescripción electrónica mejora su adecuación? Estudio antes-después / Does recommending the dosing frequency in the electronic prescription improve its adequacy? Before and after study

Objetivo: Analizar si informar la frecuencia de administración (FA) en el módulo de prescripción de la estación clínica de atención primaria (ECAP) del Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) mejora la adecuación de la FA de las prescripciones. Diseño: Estudio de adecuación antes-después con control no equivalente de prescripciones sin cambios en la FA. El periodo de estudio incluye desde el 1 de septiembre de 2019 hasta el 29 de febrero de 2020.Emplazamiento: Ámbito de atención primaria. Participantes: Se incluyen las prescripciones de los medicamentos con una única FA adecuada o mayoritariamente adecuada realizadas por los médicos de familia del ICS durante el periodo de estudio.IntervenciónRecomendar la FA adecuada en el módulo de prescripción. Mediciones principales: Adecuación definida como la coincidencia entre la FA prescrita y la FA adecuada. Resultados: Tras la intervención se produjo un aumento del 22,75% de prescripciones con FA adecuada. El mayor aumento se dio en los medicamentos del sistema genitourinario y hormonas sexuales. En términos absolutos, el grupo de antiinfecciosos es el que obtuvo más prescripciones con FA adecuada entre los dos periodos. Conclusiones: La intervención aumentó la adecuación en la FA de las prescripciones, lo que supone una mejora en la seguridad y en la eficacia de los tratamientos. Se evidencia que el diseño y la implantación de mejoras en los sistemas de prescripción electrónica contribuye a aumentar la calidad de la prescripción.(AU)

Objective: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. Design: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020.Location: Primary care setting. Participants: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included.Intervention: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. Main measurements: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. Results: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. Conclusions: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.(AU)

[Does recommending the dosing frequency in the electronic prescription improve its adequacy? Before and after study]. / ¿Recomendar la frecuencia de administración de medicamentos en la prescripción electrónica mejora su adecuación? Estudio antes-después.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. DESIGN: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020. LOCATION: Primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included. INTERVENTION: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. RESULTS: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.

Efecto del empleo de prescripciones informatizadas en la seguridad de pacientes pediátricos hospitalizados / Effect of electronic prescriptions on the safety of hospitalized pediatric patients

Introducción. Los errores en prescripción médica (EPM) son la causa más frecuente de errores prevenibles. El empleo de sistemas de prescripción informatizada (PI) contribuiría a disminuir el error y a mejorar la calidad de atención. Objetivos. Evaluar el efecto de la PI en la prevalencia de EPM y eventos adversos (EA) relacionados en pacientes pediátricos hospitalizados. Evaluar la adherencia, aceptabilidad y apropiabilidad de la herramienta por parte de los usuarios. Método. Diseño híbrido, descriptivo y cuasiexperimental tipo antes-después. Se incluyeron prescripciones médicas de pacientes hospitalizados, calculando la prevalencia de EPM y EA relacionados, en los períodos pre-y pos implementación de la PI en un hospital pediátrico (HP) y en uno general (HG) que se tomó como control. Se evaluó la adherencia mediante la proporción de las PI sobre las totales registradas en el período posimplementación. Se evaluó la aceptabilidad y apropiabilidad de la implementación por encuesta a los usuarios. Resultados. Al comparar la prevalencia de EPM pre- y posimplementación en el HP, se observó una disminución estadísticamente significativa en los dos hospitales: HP 29,1 versus 19,9 EPM/100 prescripciones (OR: 1,65; IC95 %: 1,34-2,02; p < 0,01). En el HG 24,9 versus 13,6 EPM/100 prescripciones (OR: 2,1; IC95 %: 1,5-2,8; p < 0,01). La tasa de adherencia global a la PI fue del 83 %. La implementación presentó aceptabilidad y apropiabilidad satisfactoria. Conclusión. La prevalencia de EPM se redujo un 30 % posimplementación. La adherencia global a la herramienta fue satisfactoria

Introduction. Prescription errors are the most common cause of preventable errors. Electronic prescription (EP) systems may help to reduce errors and improve the quality of care. Objectives. To assess the effect of EP on the prevalence of prescription errors and related adverse events (AE) among hospitalized pediatric patients. To assess EP adherence, acceptability, and suitability among users. Method. Hybrid, descriptive, and quasi-experimental, before-and-after design. Prescriptions made to hospitalized patients were included, estimating the prevalence of prescription errors and related AE in the pre- and post- EP implementation periods at a children's hospital (CH) and a general hospital (GH) used as control. Adherence was assessed based on the proportion of EP among all prescriptions registered in the post-implementation period. The acceptability and suitability of EP implementation was assessed via a user survey. Results. The prevalence of prescription errors pre- and post-EP implementation at the CH was compared and a statistically significant reduction was observed in both hospitals: CH: 29.1 versus 19.9 prescription errors/100 prescriptions (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.34-2.02;p < 0.01). GH: 24.9 versus 13.6 prescription errors/100 prescriptions (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5-2.8; p < 0.01). The rate of overall adherence to EP was 83%. The implementation of EP was adequately acceptable and suitable. Conclusion. The prevalence of prescription errors reduced 30% after the implementation of EP. The overall adherence to EP was adequate.

Relación entre el control de la presión arterial y la adherencia al tratamiento medida mediante el sistema de receta XXI en Granada (España) / Relationship between blood pressure control and treatment adherence measured using the electronic prescription in Granada (Spain)

Introducción: La adherencia al tratamiento ha sido identificada como uno de los factores más importantes para conseguir valores de presión arterial adecuados en pacientes hipertensos. Objetivo: Describir cuál es la adherencia de los pacientes al tratamiento antihipertensivo determinada mediante los registros de retirada de medicamentos por prescripción electrónica (Receta XXI) y estudiar la relación que existe entre dicha adherencia y el control de la presión arterial (PA). Método: Descriptivo transversal desde mayo de 2017 hasta mayo de 2019, en 6 farmacias comunitarias de la provincia de Granada (España). Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años que tomaban al menos un medicamento antihipertensivo durante un mínimo de 6 meses. Variables principales: Control de la presión arterial y adherencia al tratamiento antihipertensivo mediante el Sistema Receta XXI. Resultados: 95 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio. 49 (51,6%) no tenían controlada la PA y 29 (30.5%) paciente mostraron tener una adherencia sub-óptima. El análisis multivariante mostró que el grado de adherencia no estaba asociado a ninguna de las variables incluidas en el estudio y el control de la PA sólo estuvo relacionado con el sexo (OR: 0,044; IC95%: 0,005-0,427), con haber padecido arritmia cardiaca (OR: 0,004; IC95%: 0,000-0,106) y con padecer ansiedad (OR: 0,109; IC95%: 0,013-0,933). Conclusión: La prevalencia de hipertensión arterial no controlada fue muy elevada (51,6%) y no hubo asociación con factores de riesgo sociodemográficos habituales como la actividad física, tabaquismo o IMC. La falta de adherencia al tratamiento también tuvo una prevalencia muy alta (30.5%) sin embargo no mostró ser factor de riesgo PA no controlada. (AU)

Background: Treatment adherence has been identified as one of the most relevant factors in achieving adequate blood pressure values in hypertensive patients. Aims: To describe patient adherence to antihypertensive treatment determined by drug collection records of the electronic prescription system and study the relationship between this adherence and blood pressure control. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from May 2017 to May 2019, in 6 community pharmacies in the province of Granada (Spain). Patients over 18 years of age who took at least one antihypertensive medication for at least six months were included. Main outcome measure: Blood pressure control and adherence to antihypertensive treatment using the electronic prescription. Results: A total of 95 patients were included in the study. A total of 49 patients (51.6%) showed no blood pressure control, and 29 patients (30.5%) showed suboptimal adherence. The multivariate analysis showed no association between the degree of adherence and the variables included in the study, and blood pressure control was only related to sex (OR: 0.044; 95%CI: 0.005-0.427), to cardiac arrhythmia (OR: 0.004; 95% CI: 0.000-0.106) and to anxiety (OR: 0.109; 95% CI: 0.013-0.933). Conclusion: The prevalence of uncontrolled blood pressure was very high (51.6%), and no association with common sociodemographic risk factors, such as physical activity, smoking, or body mass index, was found. Non-adherence to treatment also had a very high prevalence (30.5%), but it was not associated with disease control. (AU)

[Electronic medical record and prescription: risks and benefits detected since its implementation. Safe designing, rollout and use]. / Historia clínica y receta electrónica: riesgos y beneficios detectados desde su implantación. Diseño, despliegue y usos seguros.

New information technologies have transformed the way care is delivered within health services, permeating almost every aspect of health care. As the complexity of the system increases, it becomes more difficult to work optimally without the assistance of new technologies. Although its implementation represents a breakthrough, either because of the advancement involved in the proper use of any technology in health care, or because of the development of specific applications that improve patient safety, other factors such as incorrect design, implementation and poor maintenance, inadequate training, along with overconfidence and dependency, can make technologies compromise patient safety. This article describes the beneficial effects, and those that are not so, of the introduction in our country of the electronic medical record and the electronic prescription on the healthcare quality and safety.

Effectiveness, safety and implementation results of the strategies aimed at the safe prescription of medications in university hospitals in adult patients. Systematic review / Efectividad, seguridad y resultados de implementación de estrategias dirigidas al proceso de prescripción segura de medicamentos en hospitales universitarios en pacientes adultos. Revisión sistemática

Abstract Introduction A broad range of practices aimed at improving the effectives and safety of this process have been documented over the past few years. Objective To establish the effectiveness, safety and results of the implementation of these strategies in adult patients in university hospitals. Methodology A review of systematic reviews was conducted, in addition to a database search in the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Epistemonikos, LILACS and gray literature. Any strategy aimed at reducing prescription-associated risks was included as intervention. This review followed the protocol registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42020165143. Results 7,637 studies were identified, upon deleting duplicate references. After excluding records based on titles and abstracts, 111 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Fifteen studies were included in the review. Several interventions grouped into 5 strategies addressed to the prescription process were identified; the use of computerized medical order entry systems (CPOE), whether integrated or not with computerized decision support systems (CDSS), was the most effective approach. Conclusions The beneficial effects of the interventions intended to the prescription process in terms of efficacy were identified; however, safety and implementation results were not thoroughly assessed. The heterogeneity of the studies and the low quality of the reviews, preclude a meta-analysis.

Resumen Introducción En los últimos años se han documentado gran variedad de prácticas dirigidas a mejorar la efectividad y la seguridad de este proceso. Objetivo Establecer la efectividad, seguridad y resultados de implementación de estas estrategias en pacientes adultos en hospitales universitarios. Metodología Se realizó una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas. Igualmente, la búsqueda en las bases de datos de la Biblioteca Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas, Medline, Embase, Epistemonikos, LILACS y literatura gris. Se incluyó como intervención cualquier estrategia dirigida a reducir el riesgo asociado a un error de prescripción. Esta revisión siguió el protocolo registrado en el Registro Prospectivo Internacional de Revisiones Sistemáticas (PROSPERO): CRD42020165143. Resultados Se identificaron 7.637 estudios después de eliminar las referencias duplicadas. Después de la exclusión de registros basados en títulos y resúmenes, se evaluaron 111 textos completos para elegibilidad. Se incluyeron quince estudios en la revisión. Se identificaron varias intervenciones agrupadas en 5 estrategias dirigidas al proceso de prescripción, de las cuales el uso de sistemas computarizados de entrada de órdenes médicas (CPOE) integrados o no a sistemas de soporte de decisión computarizados (CDSS) la estrategia más eficaz. Conclusiones Se identificaron efectos benéficos de las intervenciones dirigidas al proceso de prescripción en términos de eficacia; sin embargo, la seguridad y los resultados de implementación no fueron ampliamente evaluados. La heterogeneidad de los estudios y la baja calidad de las revisiones impiden la realización de un metaanálisis.

Una estrategia para reducir el error de prescripción de medicamentos en pacientes hospitalizados / A strategy to reduce medication prescription error in hospitalized patients

Resumen Los errores de prescripción representan un relevante problema en salud. Este trabajo se propone analizar el error de prescripción de medicación en pacientes hospitalizados antes y después de una intervención múltiple. Se trata de un estudio cuasi experimental de tipo antes-después no controlado. La intervención consistió en la estandarización del proceso de prescripción y el entrenamiento del personal que prescribe. El porcentaje de error de prescripción antes de la intervención fue del 28.8% (n = 182), es decir 28.8 prescripciones incorrectas cada 100 prescripciones médicas. El dominio más frecuente de error fue: dosis in adecuada 52.2% (n = 95), medicamento incorrecto 33% (n = 60), días de tratamiento inapropiado 4.4%(n = 8) y otros 10.4% (n = 19). Luego de la intervención el error descendió a 4.3% (n = 26): 4.3 prescripciones con error cada 100 efectuadas, siendo el error más frecuente la dosis incorrecta: 76.9% (n = 20), otros 23.1% (n = 6). El daño asociado a medicación inadecuadamente prescripta antes y después fue de 0.95 (n = 6) eventos y 0.33 (n = 2) eventos cada 100 admisiones, respectivamente. La intervención de mejora resultó útil para la reducción del error de prescripción en esta institución y muestra de pacientes.

Abstract Prescription errors represent a relevant health problem. This work aims to analyze the medication prescription error in hospitalized patients before and after a multiple intervention. This is a quasi-experimental study of the uncontrolled before-after type. The intervention consisted of the standardization of the prescription process and the training of the prescribing staff. The percentage of prescription error before the intervention was 28.8% (n = 182), that is, 28.8 incorrect prescriptions per 100 medical prescriptions. The most frequent domain of error was: inappropriate dose 52.2% (n = 95), followed by incorrect medication 33% (n = 60), by days of inappropriate treatment 4.4% (n = 8) and others 10.4% (n = 19 ). After the intervention, the error decreased to 4.3% (n = 26), that is, 4.3 pre scriptions with error every 100 prescriptions, the most frequent error being the incorrect dose: 76.9% (n = 20), another 23.1% (n = 6 ). The harm associated with inadequately prescribed medication before and after was 0.95 (n = 6) events and 0.33 (n = 2) events per 100 admissions respectively. The improvement intervention was useful for reducing the prescription error in this institution and patient sample.

Variabilidad en el registro de alergias entre niveles asistenciales / Variability in allergies registration between care levels

Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio es comparar el grado de coincidencia en el registro de alergias entre las aplicaciones informáticas de los distintos niveles asistenciales (atención primaria y hospitalaria).Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de 2 meses de duración en el que participaron todas las unidades clínicas con prescripción electrónica. Se incluyó en el estudio a todos los pacientes ingresados con al menos una alergia registrada en la aplicación informática hospitalaria. Se cuantificó el porcentaje de alergias registradas en hospital, atención primaria o ambas.Resultados: Se incluyeron 723 pacientes en los que se registraron 1.280 alergias. El ratio de alergias por paciente fue 1,77. La media de edad fue 62±37 años y el 58,37% eran mujeres. El 80,47% de las alergias registradas fueron farmacológicas.De manera global el 42,11% de todas las alergias fueron registradas en ambas aplicaciones. El 21,20% de las alergias no farmacológicas y el 47,18% de las alergias farmacológicas fueron registradas en ambas aplicaciones. Del total de las alergias farmacológicas detectadas en el estudio, el 68,08% estaban registradas en atención primaria y el 79,13% en atención hospitalaria. Respecto al total de las alergias no farmacológicas el 37,20% estaban registradas en atención primaria y el 84% en la aplicación de atención hospitalaria. Conclusiones: En nuestro estudio hemos encontrado una gran variabilidad en el registro de alergias en los diferentes niveles asistenciales. En menos de la mitad de los casos se registra la alergia en ambos niveles. (AU)

This study aims at comparing the coincidence degree between different allergy-recording computer applications that can be found in distinct levels of the health care system (primary care and hospital care).Methods: Two-month retrospective descriptive and observational study for analyzed records in Clinical Units equipped by electronic prescription. All in-patients who had at least one allergy record registered in the hospital computer application were included in the study. The percentage of allergies registered in hospital, primary care or both applications was quantified.Results: 723 patients were included, among whom 1,280 allergies were recorded. The allergy ratio per patient was 1.77. The average age was 62±37 years and 58.37% were women. 80.47% of the recorded allergies were drug-related.42.11% of global allergies were registered in both applications. 21.20% of non-drug-related allergies and 47.18% of drug-related allergies were registered in both applications. According to the total of drug allergies detected in the study, 68.08% were registered in primary care and 79.13% in hospital care. Regarding to the total of non-drug-related allergies, 37.20% were registered in primary care and 84% in hospital care.Conclusions: Our study reported a high variability in the allergy registration between the different levels of the care health system. Less than the half of allergy cases are registered in both care levels studied. (AU)

[Impact of introducing assisted electronic prescription on paediatric patient safety]. / Impacto de la implantación de la prescripción electrónica asistida en la seguridad del paciente pediátrico.

OBJECTIVE: There have been very few studies on the effect of assisted electronic prescription on paediatric patient safety. The objective of this study is to compare medication errors that occurred before and after its introduction in a tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental comparative study of medication errors detected before and after assisted electronic prescription introduction. All treatment lines were analysed in order to detect the point in the chain where the medication error occurred, as well as its type and cause. A Delphi study was conducted on the importance of each medication error involving doctors, nurses, and pharmacists. RESULTS: The study included 166 patients (83 at each stage). At least one medication error was detected in 92% in the pre-introduction phase patients (2.8±2.1 errors/patient) and 7.2% of post-introduction phase patients (0.1±0.4 errors/patient). The assisted electronic prescription led to an absolute risk reduction of 40% (95% confidence interval=35.6-44.4%). The main cause of error was lapses and carelessness in both stages. Medication errors were considered serious in 9.5% of cases in the pre-introduction phase, while all of them were mild or moderate in the post-introduction phase. CONCLUSIONS: The assisted electronic prescription implementation with prescription, validation and medication administration assistance systems significantly reduces medication errors and eliminates serious errors.

[Analysis of drug-related problems in a tertiary university hospital in Barcelona (Spain)]. / Análisis de los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos en un hospital de tercer nivel de Barcelona.

OBJECTIVE: To describe drug-related problems identified in hospitalized patients and to assess physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' recommendations. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that included all drug-related problems detected in hospitalized patients during 2014-2015. Statistical analysis included a descriptive analysis of the data and a multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between pharmacists' recommendation acceptance rate and the variable of interest. RESULTS: During the study period 4587 drug-related problems were identified in 44,870 hospitalized patients. Main drug-related problems were prescription errors due to incorrect use of the computerized physician order entry (18.1%), inappropriate drug-drug combination (13.3%) and dose adjustment by renal and/or hepatic function (11.5%). Acceptance rate of pharmacist therapy advice in evaluable cases was 81.0%. Medical versus surgical admitting department, specific types of intervention (addition of a new drug, drug discontinuation and correction of a prescription error) and oral communication of the recommendation were associated with a higher acceptance rate. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study allow areas to be identified on which to implement optimization strategies. These include training courses for physicians on the computerized physician order entry, on drugs that need dose adjustment with renal impairment, and on relevant drug interactions.

Prescripción Electrónica / Electronic prescription

INTRODUCCIÓN Los errores de medicación son una amenaza para los pacientes que reciben drogas antirretrovirales (ARV) en el ámbito ambulatorio, exponiéndolos a toxicidad, suspensiones de tratamiento, fallo de tratamiento y resistencia a ARV. La prescripción electrónica es una estrategia utilizada en otros ámbitos para disminuir los errores de medicación y mejorar de esta manera la seguridad de los pacientes. METODOS Se llevo adelante un estudio de implementación de prescripción electrónica de ARV midiendo Alcance, Efectividad, Adopción, Implementación y Mantenimiento en dos hospitales públicos de la República Argentina, en un periodo atravesado por la pandemia COVID cuantitativo prospectivo de diseño hibrido tipo 3 dentro del marco RE-AIM. RESULTADOS La estrategia en su componente primario se comenzó a aplicar el 15/04/20. Los componentes secundarios fueron implementados parcialmente en forma sucesiva. Se logro un alcance del 95.2% de la población objetivo. Con respecto a la efectividad se evaluaron el número y tipo de errores. Previo a la implementación se identificaron 89 errores. Post intervención se identificaron 29. No se identificaron errores tipo E en el periodo post-intervencion. No hubo interrupciones estrictamente relacionadas a dificultad en la prescripción de la medicación, por el contrario, el mecanismo fue percibido favorablemente por todos los usuarios. La adopción de la estrategia fue generalizada por todo el equipo de salud y todos los estamentos. La implementación fue dificultosa por diferentes motivos y se vio atravesada por la pandemia COVID. Se logro la implementación al 100% del componente central de la intervención (dispensa sin receta en papel) pero no se implementaron todos los componentes secundarios. Se objetivo la inclusión sostenida de pacientes, la adherencia a TARV fue aceptable en mas de dos tercios de la población. 78% de los sujetos estaban indetectables previo a la intervención y 83% luego de la misma.DISCUSIÓN La estrategia pudo ser implementada, a pesar de las dificultades que atravesaron este periodo. Se observo un gran alcance y adopción, no se incrementaron los errores y se objetivo una alta adherencia a TARV y alta prevalencia de indetectabilidad en la población alcanzada. Se debe continuar trabajando en la implementación de los componentes secundarios para asegurar el mantenimiento de la estrategia en el largo plazo

[Perceptions on electronic prescribing by primary care physicians in madrid healthcare service]. / Percepción de los médicos de atención primaria sobre la receta electrónica en el Servicio Madrileño de Salud.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the opinion of Primary Care physicians regarding electronic prescribing. METHODS: Descriptive study by means of a questionnaire sent to 527 primary care physicians. PERIOD: June 2014. The questionnaire included closed questions about interest shown, satisfaction, benefits, weaknesses, and barriers, and one open question about difficulties, all of them referred to electronic prescribing. Satisfaction was measured using 1-10 scale, and benefits, weaknesses, and barriers were evaluated by a 5-ítems Likert scale. Interest was measured using both methods. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail for on line response through Google Drive® tool. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 47% (248/527). Interest shown was 8.7 (95% CI; 8.5-8.9) and satisfaction was 7.9 (95% CI; 7.8-8). The great majority 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents used electronic prescribing where possible. Most reported benefits were: 73.4% (95% CI; 67.8-78.9%) of respondents considered that electronic prescribing facilitated medication review, and 59.3% (95% CI; 53.1-65.4) of them felt that it reduced bureaucratic burden. Among the observed weaknesses, they highlighted the following: 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents believed specialist care physicians should also be able to use electronic prescribing. Concerning to barriers: 30.2% (95% CI; 24.5-36%) of respondents think that entering a patient into the electronic prescribing system takes too much time, and 4% (95% CI; 1.6-6.5%) of them perceived the application as difficult to use. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians showed a notable interest in using electronic prescribing and high satisfaction with the application performance.

[Medication reconciliation at hospital admission: Results and identification of target patients]. / Conciliación de la medicación al ingreso: resultados e identificación de pacientes diana.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and to classify the discrepancies between the admission treatment and the usual patient treatment. To determine the variables that predict those patients that will have more benefit from medication reconciliation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective medication reconciliation study was conducted in the Vascular Surgery Unit from March 2014 to December 2014. When the patients were admitted to the Vascular Surgery Unit, they were informed about the study and asked to prepare information about their chronic treatment. The pharmacist then checked their clinical records, outpatient prescriptions, and also interviewed the patient, obtaining the best pharmacotherapeutic history available. The discrepancies with the admission treatment were written into the patient electronic clinical records. Finally, the physician classified the discrepancies, and changed the treatment, if needed. The statistical analysis included a comparison between patients with and without a non-justified discrepancy (NJD). The statistically different characteristics were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, in order to determine the sensitivity and the specificity of these variables to select patients with discrepancies. RESULTS: A total of 380 patients were included. There were 845 non-justified, 600 justified non-documented, and 439 justified documented discrepancies. At least one NJD was identified in 293 patients (77%), with 65 patients (17%) having only justified discrepancies, and 22 patients (6%) having no discrepancies. NJD were: different dose, route or schedule (51%), omission (39%), wrong drug (8%) and commission (2%). The variables associated with discrepancies were number of chronic medications drugs and provider of information. CONCLUSIONS: In most studies, omission is the most frequent error. In contrast, in our study the most frequent error is different dose, route, or schedule. The variable that allows selecting patients at higher risk of discrepancies is the number of chronic drugs. This risk is also increased if the patients are not the manager of their own medication.

Risk factors for medication errors in the electronic and manual prescription / Fatores de risco para erros de medicação na prescrição eletrônica e manual / Factores de riesgo para errores de medicación en la prescripción electrónica y manual

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare electronic and manual prescriptions of a public hospital of Brasilia, identifying risk factors for the occurrence of medication errors. Method: descriptive-exploratory, comparative and retrospective study. Data collection occurred from July 2012 to January 2013, using an instrument for the review of the information contained in medical records related to the medication process. A total of 190 manual and 199 electronic records composed the sample, with 2027 prescriptions each. Results: compared to the manual prescription, a significant reduction was observed in the risk factors after implantation of the electronic prescription, in items such as "lack of the form of dilution" (71.1% to 22.3%) and "prescription with brand name" (99.5% to 31.5%). Conversely, the risk factors "no check" and "lack of CRM of the prescriber" increased. The lack of the allergy registration and the occurrences related to medication were the same for both groups. Conclusion: generally, the use of the electronic prescription system was associated with a significant reduction in risk factors for medication errors, concerning the following aspects: illegibility, prescription with brand name and presence of essential items that provide a safe and effective prescription.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar as prescrições eletrônicas e manuais de um hospital público do Distrito Federal, identificando os fatores de risco para ocorrência de erros de medicação. Método: Estudo descritivo-exploratório, comparativo e retrospectivo. A coleta de dados ocorreu no período de julho de 2012 a janeiro de 2013, através de instrumento para revisão das informações referentes ao processo de medicação contidas em prontuários. Integraram a amostra 190 prontuários manuais e 199 eletrônicos, com 2027 prescrições cada. Resultados: na comparação com a prescrição manual, observou-se redução significativa dos fatores de risco após implantação da eletrônica, em itens como "falta da forma de diluição" (71,1% e 22,3%) e "prescrição com nome comercial" (99,5%/31,5%), respectivamente. Por outro lado, os fatores de risco "não checar" e "falta de CRM do prescritor" aumentaram. A ausência de registro de alergia e as ocorrências em relação aos medicamentos são equivalentes para os dois grupos. Conclusão: de maneira geral, a utilização do sistema de prescrição eletrônica foi associada à redução significativa dos fatores de risco para erros de medicação nos seguintes aspectos: ilegibilidade, prescrição com nome comercial e presença de itens essenciais que proporcionam prescrição eficaz e segura.

RESUMEN Objetivo: comparar las prescripciones electrónicas y manuales de un hospital público del Distrito Federal, identificando los factores de riesgo para la ocurrencia de errores de medicación. Método: estudio descriptivo exploratorio, comparativo y retrospectivo. La recolección de datos ocurrió en el período de julio de 2012 a enero de 2013, a través de instrumento para revisión de las informaciones referentes al proceso de medicación contenidas en fichas médicas. Integraron la muestra 190 fichas médicas manuales y 199 electrónicas, con 2.027 prescripciones cada una. Resultados: en la comparación con la prescripción manual, se observó reducción significativa de los factores de riesgo después de la implantación de la electrónica, en ítems como "falta de la forma de dilución" (71,1% y 22,3%) y "prescripción con nombre comercial" (99,5%/31,5%), respectivamente. Por otro lado, los factores de riesgo "no verificar" y "falta de CRM del prescriptor" aumentaron. La ausencia de registro de alergia y las ocurrencias en relación a los medicamentos son equivalentes para los dos grupos. Conclusión: de manera general, la utilización del sistema de prescripción electrónica fue asociada a reducción significativa de los factores de riesgo para errores de medicación en los siguientes aspectos: ilegibilidad, prescripción con nombre comercial y presencia de ítems esenciales que proporcionan prescripción eficaz y segura.

Alertas para uso de antimicrobianos terapêuticos / Alerts for use of therapeutic antimicrobials

O OBJETIVO deste trabalho é descrever o processo de funcionamento dos alertas para dias de utilização de antimicrobianos terapêuticos e analisar o impacto da implantação destes alertas nas suspensões dos itens. MÉTODOS: O estudo foi conduzido na Sociedade Beneficente de Senhoras Hospital Sírio Libanês em Março de 2015, onde se implementou um programa de controle de antimicrobianos terapêuticos que consistiu nas seguintes intervenções: Apresentação de alertas e análise dos dados de DDD (Dose Diária Definida) nas UTIs. CONCLUSÃO: Pode se dizer que o uso de alertas para dias de utilização de antimicrobianos terapêuticos na prescrição eletrônica associado à intervenção educativa por um infectologista, preservando a autonomia do médico prescritor foram eficazes na redução do consumo de antimicrobiano sem um hospital privado de corpo clínico aberto.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the operating procedure for alerts to day use of therapeutic antimicrobials and analyze the impact of the implementation of these alerts in the suspensions of the items. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Sociedade Beneficente de Senhoras Hospital Sírio Libanês in March 2015, which implemented a therapeutic antimicrobial control program that consisted of the following interventions: Presentation alertsand analysis of DDD data (Defined Daily Dose) ICUs. CONCLUSION: It can be said that the use of alerts for days of use of therapeutic antimicrobials in CPOE associated with educational intervention for infectious disease, preserving the autonomy of the prescribing physician were effective in reducing antimicrobial consumption in a private hospital to open medical staff.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es describir el procedimiento de funcionamiento de los alertas de día de uso de los antimicrobianos terapéuticos y analizar el impacto de la aplicación de estas alertas en las suspensiones de los mismos. MÉTODOS: El estudio se realizó en la Sociedade Beneficente de Senhoras Hospital Sírio Libanês en 2015 de marzo, lo que puso en práctica un programa de control antimicrobiano terapéutico que constaba de las siguientes intervenciones: alertas de presentación y análisis de los datos DDD (dosis diaria definida) en las UCIs. CONCLUSIÓN: Se puede decir que el uso de alertas para los días de uso de antimicrobianos terapéuticos en CPOE asociado con la intervención educativa para las enfermedades infecciosas, la preservación de la autonomía del médico que prescribe fueron efectivos para reducir el consumo de antimicrobianos en un hospital privado de cuerpo clínico abierto.

Impacto da informatização intra-hospitalar sobre a gestão de custos: Integração da prescrição eletrônica das fórmulas pediátricas e das dietas enterais com suas respectivas áreas de produção / Impact of intrahospital informatization on cost management: Integration of electronic prescription of pediatric formulas and enteral diets with their respective production areas

Introduction: Informatization contributes to the integration among various sectors, cost reduction, and improved quality of services. This study aimed to assess the impact on cost/benefit of the integration of electronic prescription of pediatric formulas and enteral diets in the respective production areas in a hospital. Methods: We analyzed the quantitative consumption and financial cost of the products corresponding to 80% of the budget ceiling for the annual programming of each modality during 2 consecutive months in two steps, i.e., before and after the implementation of the new module. Results: A more effective control of the quantities produced and of the final products dispensed was observed, reducing both the traceable and untraceable demands (an 85% reduction in financial terms from R$ 3770.25/months before to R$ 566.73/month after). Conclusion: The change represented a technological innovation that improved the quality of the service provided and contributed to waste reduction.

Introducción: La informatización contribuye para la integración entre distintos sectores, la reducción de costes y la mejora de la calidad de los servicios. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el impacto sobre los costes y beneficios que ofrece la integración de la receta electrónica de formulaciones pediátricas y la alimentación enteral con sus respectivas zonas de producción de un hospital. Métodos: Se analizaron el consumo cuantitativo y financiero de los productos correspondientes al 80% del límite máximo del presupuesto de la programación anual de cada modalidad durante 2 meses consecutivos en dos etapas, antes y después de la implementación del nuevo módulo. Resultados: Hubo un control más efectivo de las cantidades producidas, dio a conocer los productos finales, reduciendo las demandas tanto trazables y no rastreables (reducción de 85% en términos financieros, de R$ 3770,25 / mes por adelantado y R$ 566,73 / mes más tarde). Conclusión: El cambio representó una innovación tecnológica que proporciona una mejor calidad de servicio y ha contribuido a la reducción de residuos.

[Patient safety in primary care: PREFASEG project]. / Seguridad del paciente en atención primaria: proyecto PREFASEG (PREscripción FArmacológica SEGura).

The Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) has designed and integrated in electronic clinical station of primary care a new software tool to support the prescription of drugs, which can detect on-line certain medication errors. The software called PREFASEG (stands for Secure drug prescriptions) aims to prevent adverse events related to medication use in the field of primary health care (PHC). This study was made on the computerized medical record called CPT, which is used by all PHC physicians in our institution -3,750- and prescribing physicians through it. PREFASEG integrated in eCAP in July 2010 and six months later we performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate their usefulness and refine their design. The software alerts on-line in 5 dimensions: drug interactions, redundant treatments, allergies, contraindications of drugs with disease, and advises against drugs in over 75 years. PREFASEG generated 1,162,765 alerts (1 per 10 high treatment), with the detection of therapeutic duplication (62%) the most alerted. The overall acceptance rate is 35%, redundancies pharmacological (43%) and allergies (26%) are the most accepted. A total of 10,808 professionals (doctors and nurses) have accepted some of the recommendations of the program. PREFASEG is a feasible and highly efficient strategy to achieve an objective of Quality Plan for the NHS.

[Health personnel assessment about medical order entry systems of pharmacologic treatments in hospitalized patients]. / Análisis de las preferencias de los profesionales sanitarios respecto a la prescripción electrónica de tratamientos farmacológicos en pacientes hospitalizados.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate health personnel perceptions about medical order entry systems concerning the effect on workflow, medication errors risk and assessment of its potential advantages. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-section opinion interview was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Questionnaire consisted of three sections: perception of its effect on workflow, influence on medication error risk and assessment of potential advantages. We also asked them to assess drawbacks and provide suggestions about this prescription system. RESULTS: 76 health professionals were interviewed (58 physicians, 9 pharmacists and 9 nurses). They were satisfied mainly due to decrease the workload (85.5%; IC 95%: 75.58-92.55). They thought that the main characteristics that contribute to reduce medication errors are clinical decision supports related to predefined aspects which the program provided by default. Among potential benefits of medical order entry systems, legibility and warnings triggered by the program (98.7%; IC 95%: 92.90-99.97 and 97,4%; IC 95%: 90.81-99.68 respectively) were the most valuable. High technology dependence, IT failures and lack of infrastructure and medication therapy discontinuities at times of transition between different hospitals' units were the main drawbacks considered. The most repeated suggestion was related to the improvement of links between other health informatics applications used in the hospital. CONCLUSION: health personnel were highly satisfied with the CPOE system, which is considered to be effective and safe. Technology dependence and IT failures were the main disadvantages reported. According to them, a greater coordination and unification of all software applications available in the hospital would be desirable.

Non-participation bias in health services reseach using data from an integrated electronic prescribing project: the role of informed consent / Sego por falta de participación en la investigación de los servicios de salud al usar datos de un proyecto integrado de prescripción electrónica: el papel del consentimiento informado / Sesgo pela falta de participação na pesquisa dos serviços de saúde ao usar dados de um projeto integrado de prescrição eletrônica: o papel do consentimento informado

Electronic prescribing potentially reduces adverse outcomes and provides critical information for drug safety research but studies may be distorted by non-participation bias. 52,507 patients and 28 physicians were evaluated to determine characteristics associated with consent status in an electronic prescribing project. Physicians with less technology proficiency, seeing more patients, and having patients with higher fragmentation of care were less likely to obtain consent. Older patients with complex health status, higher income, and more visits to the study physician were more likely to consent. These systematic differences could result in significant non-participation bias for research conducted only with consenting patients.

La prescripción electrónica reduce, potencialmente, los resultados adversos. y proporciona información crítica para una investigación segura en drogas, pero los estudios pueden ser distorsionados por un sesgo por falta de participación. Se evaluó a 52.505 pacientes y a 28 médicos para determinar características asociadas con el estatus del consentimiento en un proyecto de prescripción electrónica. Los médicos con menor eficiencia tecnológica, con más cantidad de pacientes que, además, mostraban mayor fragmentación en su atención, presentaban menor opción de obtener consentimiento. Los pacientes de más edad, con estatus de salud complejo, mayor ingreso y con más visitas al médico a cargo, manifestaban mayor disposición a consentir. Estas diferencias sistemáticas podrían desembocar en un sesgo significativo por falta de participación en la investigación llevada a cabo sólo con pacientes con consentimiento.

A prescrição eletrônica reduz potencialmente os resultados adversos e proporciona informação crítica para uma pesquisa segura em drogas, porém os estudos podem ser destorcidos por um sesgo por falta de participação. Avaliou-se 52.505 pacientes e a 28 médicos para determinar características associadas com o estatus do consentimento num projeto de prescrição eletrônica. Os médicos com menor eficiência tecnológica, com mais quantidade de pacientes que os outros, mostravam maior fragmentação em sua atenção, apresentavam menos opção para conseguir o consentimento. Os pacientes mais idosos, com estudos de saúde maiôs complexos, maiores salários e com mais visitas ao médico, manifestavam maior disposição de consentir. Estas diferenças sistemáticas poderiam desembocar num erro significativo por falta de participação na pesquisa levada a cabo somente com pacientes que consentiram.