ABSTRACT
Introducción: Los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos constituyen una gran preocupación sanitaria por su elevado impacto en la morbilidad de pacientes hospitalizados.Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal en los servicios clínicos de cinco instituciones de salud de Santiago de Cuba, durante el primer trimestre de 2020. Se revisaron los perfiles de 329 pacientes que recibieron seguimiento farmacoterapéutico. La muestra fue caracterizada según variables biosociales, clínicas y farmacoterapéuticas, la identificación de los problemas relacionados a la medicación fue realizada utilizando los criterios de Cipolle, Stramd y Morley, determinándose además los medicamentos implicados en los problemas relacionados a la medicación. Los datos fueron procesados a través de frecuencias absolutas y relativas representadas por medio de tablas y figuras.Resultados: Predominaron los pacientes mayores o iguales de 60 años representando un 38,6 %; respecto al género un 61,4 % perteneció al femenino. La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron hasta dos enfermedades (76,3 %), las infecciones respiratorias complicadas (35,6 %) fueron el motivo de ingreso más frecuente. El 36,5 % consumió entre cuatro y seis medicamentos, siendo los antibacterianos de usos sistémicos los más prescritos. Se identificaron 598 Problemas Relacionados con los Medicamentos para una proporción de 1,8 PRM/paciente, de estos un 42,8 % corresponde a los problemas de Seguridad, un 31,1 % de Indicación, seguido de 24,9 % de Efectividad y finalmente el 1,2 % de Adherencia.Conclusiones: Los antimicrobianos resultaron los más implicados en la aparición de los problemas relacionados a la medicación. La atención farmacéutica ofrece servicios que garantizan el uso adecuado de los medicamentos. (AU)
Introduction: Drug-related problems are a major health concern because of their high impact on inpatient morbidity. Method: Descriptive and cross-sectional observational, study in the clinical services of five health institutions of Santiago de Cuba, during the first quarter of 2020. The profiles of 329 patients who received pharmacotherapeutic follow-up were reviewed. The sample was characterized according to biosocials, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic variables, the identification of medication-related problems was performed using the criteria of Cipolle, Stramd and Morley, also determining the drugs involved in medication-related problems. The data were processed through absolute and relative frequencies represented by means of tables and figures. Results: Patients over or equal to 60 years of age predominated, representing 38.6 %; 61.4 % of the patients were female. Most of the patients had up to two diseases (76.3 %); complicated respiratory infections (35.6 %) were the most frequent reason for admission. Between four and six medications were consumed by 36.5 %, with antibacterials for systemic use being the most prescribed. A total of 598 drug-related problems were identified for a ratio of 1.8 DRP/patient, of which 42.8 % corresponded to safety problems, 31.1 % to indication, followed by 24.9 % to effectiveness and finally 1.2 % to adherence. Conclusions: Antimicrobials were the most implicated in the occurrence of medication-related problems. Pharmaceutical care offers services that ensure the appropriate use of medications. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aftercare , Hospitalization , Treatment Outcome , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , CubaABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the appropriateness of medication prescribing and to analyze interventions carried out in polymedicated elderly patients in nursing homes (NHs). Methods: Prospective study of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in polymedicated older adults living in NHs, implemented via a collaborative project between NHs and the geriatric and pharmacy departments of a university hospital. The pharmacist reviewed patients active medical prescriptions and prepared an individualized report with proposals aimed at therapeutic optimization that was sent for evaluation to the geriatrician in charge of the NH. The drug-related problems (DRPs) were classified according to the Third Consensus of Granada and the potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) were identified by explicit criteria (STOPP/START, BEERS, LESS-CHRON), implicit criteria (MAI) and CheckTheMeds® software. It was measured the degree of acceptance of the interventions carried out, and the economic impact was calculated from the direct costs of the discontinued drugs. Results: Of the 210 patients reviewed by the pharmacy department, 105 patients from 10 NHs were analyzed. A total of 510 prescriptions with possible DRPs were identified (38.5% of all prescribed drugs). According to STOPP/START/BEERS or LESS-CHRON criteria, 41.2% were PIPs. The main DRPs identified were: unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, inappropriate dose/regimen, inappropriate treatment duration, probability of adverse events, medication not indicated, and duplicate therapy. Interventions were proposed for 81.5% of the DRPs detected, of which 73.3% were accepted. This resulted in a 23.1% reduction in the number of drugs prescribed per patient and an economic saving of 16,218 per 6-month period. (AU)
Objetivos: Adecuar la farmacoterapia y analizar las intervenciones realizadas en pacientes ancianos institucionalizados en centros sociosanitarios (CSS) con polifarmacia. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de un programa de adecuación farmacoterapéutica en pacientes ancianos polimedicados de CSS mediante la puesta en marcha de un proyecto de coordinación de geriatría, farmacia hospitalaria y CSS desde el área de atención especializada. El farmacéutico realizó una revisión farmacoterapéutica de las prescripciones activas de los pacientes, elaborándose un informe individualizado con propuestas dirigidas a la optimización terapéutica. Los problemas relacionados con la medicación (PRM) encontrados se clasificaron según el Tercer Consenso de Granada, y las prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas (PPI) se identificaron mediante criterios explícitos (STOPP/START, BEERS, criterios de deprescripción LESS-CHRON), criterios implícitos (MAI) y el programa informático CheckTheMeds®. Se midió el grado de aceptación de las intervenciones realizadas, y la repercusión económica se calculó a partir de los costes directos de los fármacos desprescritos.Resultados: De los 210 pacientes revisados por el servicio de farmacia se analizaron 105 pacientes evaluados por geriatría pertenecientes a 10 CSS. Se detectaron 510 prescripciones con posibles PRM (38,5% del total de fármacos prescritos). El 41,2% se correspondían a PPI según criterios STOPP/START/BEERS o LESS-CHRON. Los principales PRM identificados fueron: fármacos de beneficio/riesgo desfavorable, dosis o pauta no adecuada, duración no adecuada, mayor probabilidad de efectos adversos, medicamento no indicado y duplicidad. Se intervino en el 81,5% de los PRM detectados, con un grado de aceptación del 73,3% y una reducción del 23,1% en el número de medicamentos prescritos por paciente, con un ahorro económico de 16.218/6 meses. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmacies , Geriatrics , Prospective Studies , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Prescriptions , Aging , Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness of medication prescribing and to analyze interventions carried out in polymedicated elderly patients in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: Prospective study of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in polymedicated older adults living in NHs, implemented via a collaborative project between NHs and the geriatric and pharmacy departments of a university hospital. The pharmacist reviewed patients' active medical prescriptions and prepared an individualized report with proposals aimed at therapeutic optimization that was sent for evaluation to the geriatrician in charge of the NH. The drug-related problems (DRPs) were classified according to the Third Consensus of Granada and the potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) were identified by explicit criteria (STOPP/START, BEERS, LESS-CHRON), implicit criteria (MAI) and CheckTheMeds® software. It was measured the degree of acceptance of the interventions carried out, and the economic impact was calculated from the direct costs of the discontinued drugs. RESULTS: Of the 210 patients reviewed by the pharmacy department, 105 patients from 10 NHs were analyzed. A total of 510 prescriptions with possible DRPs were identified (38.5% of all prescribed drugs). According to STOPP/START/BEERS or LESS-CHRON criteria, 41.2% were PIPs. The main DRPs identified were: unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, inappropriate dose/regimen, inappropriate treatment duration, probability of adverse events, medication not indicated, and duplicate therapy. Interventions were proposed for 81.5% of the DRPs detected, of which 73.3% were accepted. This resulted in a 23.1% reduction in the number of drugs prescribed per patient and an economic saving of 16,218 per 6-month period. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of medication prescribing in polymedicated older adults living in NHs by the pharmacist has made it possible to reduce DRPs and PIPs and to save costs thanks to the high degree of acceptance by geriatricians.
Subject(s)
Pharmacy , Humans , Aged , Prospective Studies , Drug Prescriptions , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Nursing HomesABSTRACT
Fundamento. Estimar la prevalencia de prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) y de problemas relacionados con los medicamentos (PRM) en pacientes ancianos polimedicados hospitalizados, y evaluar el impacto de la intervención farmacéutica sobre dicha prevalencia. Material y métodos. Estudio de intervención, cuasi-experimental, en pacientes polimedicados (≥ 6 fármacos) que ingresaron en un servicio de Geriatría en 2018-2019. Se analizaron las PPI según criterios STOPP/START 2014 y los PRM según el Tercer Consenso de Granada. Los PPI y PRM detectados, junto con posibles acciones para solucionarlos, se remitieron al geriatra responsable. Si al alta el cambio en la prevalencia de PPI y PRM fue ≥75%, se consideró aceptada la intervención. Resultados. Se realizó intervención farmacéutica en 218 pacientes, analizándose 1.837 prescripciones. Al ingreso se observaron PPI (90,8%) y PRM (99,5%). Se realizaron 1.227 intervenciones, el 57,6% sobre PRM. Se aceptó el 53,6% de las intervenciones farmacéuticas; la PPI según criterios STOPP y START se redujo un 49,7 y un 22,1%, respectivamente; los PRM disminuyeron un 60,1%. Las frecuencias y medianas de PRM y de PPI según criterios START y STOPP se redujeron significativamente al alta. Las variables más asociadas con la aceptación de la intervención farmacéutica fueron el geriatra responsable, el número de PPI START y el número de PPI STOPP. Conclusiones. Durante el ingreso hospitalario, la detección de PPI y PRM del tratamiento crónico por el farmacéutico, y en colaboración con el médico del paciente, ayuda a disminuir, la prevalencia de PPI y PRM.(AU)
Background. The aim of the study was estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and drug related problems (DRP) in an acute geriatric ward, and to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical intervention on their prevalence. Methods. Quasi-experimental, interventional study in polymedicated patients (≥ 6 drugs) who were admitted to a Geriatric ward in 2018-2019. PIP were analyzed according to STOPP/START 2014 criteria and DRP on the Third Consensus of Granada. The PIP and DRP detected, and the possible actions to correct them, PI were sent to the physician in charge. The effect of the intervention was analyzed at hospital discharge; if the change of prevalence of PIP and DRP was ≥75%, the pharmaceutical intervention was considered to be accepted. Results. Pharmaceutical intervention was performed on 218 patients, analyzing 1,837 prescriptions. On admission, PIP (90.8%) and DRP (99.5%) were observed. We carried out 1,227 interventions, 57.6% on DRP. More than half (53.6%) of the pharmaceutical interventions were accepted; the PIP according to the STOPP and START criteria was reduced by 49.7 and 22.1%, respectively; DRP decreased by 60.1%. The frequencies and medians of PRM and PPI according to the START and STOPP criteria decreased significantly at discharge. The variables most frequently associated with acceptance of the pharmaceutical intervention were the geriatrician at charge, the number of PPI START and the number of PPI STOPP. Conclusion. The detection of PIP and DRP of chronic treatment during hospital admission by the pharmacist, and in collaboration with the patients doctor, helps to reduce the prevalence of PIP and DRP.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Health Sciences , Pharmaceutical Services , Health Services for the Aged , Polypharmacy , AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Having a general practitioner in nursing homes during the pandemic by COVID-19 has allowed a multidisciplinary intervention to systematically review medication in institutionalized elderly patients; the objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of this intervention in reducing the number of drugs/patient. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study before-after of an intervention involving general practitioner and primare care pharmacists in 4 nursing homes of less than 50 residents. A review algorithm was used to identify Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) that were part of the primare care pharmacists recommendations. The degree of acceptance by the physician of these recommendations was measured. RESULTS: 121 patients reviewed with a mean age of 86.1 years (SD: 7.2); 87.6% were women. Of 98 patients analyzed, had an average of 9.4 (SD: 4.0) drugs/patient, was reduced by -1.6 [CI 95% -1.3 to -1.9] p<.001 after the intervention, the different was statistically significant. 409 DRPs were identified, an average of 4.2 per patient, who were part of a recommendation of which 316 (77.3%) were accepted. Most of the recommendations concerned deprescription or dose adjustment. Psycholeptics, antihypertensives and analgesics were the therapeutic groups most commonly involved in the detected DRPs. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant reduction in the mean number of drugs/patient following intervention has been observed. Many DRPs have been identified through the primare care pharmacists review, which have mostly been accepted by the physician.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Nursing Homes , Pharmacists , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Revisão integrativa da literatura realizada na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), buscou identificar os principais problemas relacionados ao uso de psicotrópicos em idosos e propor soluções. Os principais problemas identificados foram reações adversas, risco de quedas e interações medicamentosas. Foram sugeridas três propostas para a redução de suas ocorrências: a adoção de um programa de prescrição eletrônica, a adoção de medidas educativas e/ou realização de acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico com estes pacientes.
An integrative review of the literature carried out in the "Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde" (BVS), sought to identify the main problems related to the use of psychotropic drugs in the elderly and propose solutions. The main problems identified were adverse reactions, risk of falls and drug interactions. Three proposals were suggested to reduce their occurrences: the adoption of an electronic prescription program, the adoption of educational measures and / or pharmacotherapeutic follow-up with these patients.
Revisión integrativa de la literatura realizada en la "Biblioteca virtual em saúde" (BVS,) buscó identificar los principales problemas relacionados al uso de psicotrópicos en ancianos y proponer soluciones. Los principales problemas identificados fueron reacciones adversas, riesgo de caídas e interacciones medicamentosas. Se sugirieron tres propuestas para la reducción de sus ocurrencias: la adopción de un programa de prescripción electrónica, adopción de medidas educativas y / o realización de seguimiento farmacoterapéutico con estos pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Aged , Risk , Accidental Falls , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Patient Education as Topic , Drug Interactions , Electronic Prescribing , Prescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsABSTRACT
Inappropriate use of drugs in older patients may have an adverse impact on several individual health outcomes, such as increasing the prevalence of adverse drug reactions, morbidity and mortality, and geriatric syndromes, as well as on health care systems, such as increased costs and longer hospital stays. Explicit criteria of drug appropriateness are increasingly used to detect and prevent inappropriate use of drugs, either within a comprehensive geriatric assessment or as tool used by different multidisciplinary geriatric teams. STOPP-START criteria, first published in 2008 (in Spanish in 2009), are being adopted as reference criteria throughout Europe. The Spanish version of the new 2014 edition (recently published in English) of the STOPP-START criteria is presented here. A review of all the papers published in Spain using the former version of these criteria is also presented, with the intention of promoting their use and for research in different health care levels.
Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/standards , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Aged , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to design and pilot a protocol for the dispensing of medications service. DESIGN: Using the requirements proposed in the Ministry of Health Pharmaceutical Care Consensus, a literature search was made applying qualitative consensus techniques. An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2009. SETTING: A total of 53 community pharmacies from 24 Spanish counties. PARTICIPANT: Patients who requested one or more particular medications with or without medical prescription for their own use or for someone in their care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The personalised medication information (IPM), the problems associated with the medications (PRM), and the negative results associated with the medication (RNM), detected by the pharmacist each time medication was dispensed, as well as the perception of the pharmacist on the operability of the protocol were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 870 medications were dispensed, with 423 (48.6%) cases of lack of personalised medication information (IPM) being detected. PRM were detected in 10.11% of the dispensed medications, as well as 68 (7.81%) suspected RNM: safety (n = 35; 51.5%), effectiveness (n = 29; 42.6%) and necessity (n = 4; 5.8%). Almost two-thirds (65.21%) of the pharmacists said that the protocol is in operation. CONCLUSIONS: The designed protocol helped to detect deficiencies in the information to the patients about their medications, as well as the PRM and RNM, and is shown to be tool that is easy to use and apply.
