Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Brain Struct Funct ; 223(3): 1229-1253, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101523

ABSTRACT

Synaptic inputs from cortex and thalamus were compared in electrophysiologically defined striatal cell classes: direct and indirect pathways' striatal projection neurons (dSPNs and iSPNs), fast-spiking interneurons (FS), cholinergic interneurons (ChINs), and low-threshold spiking-like (LTS-like) interneurons. Our purpose was to observe whether stimulus from cortex or thalamus had equivalent synaptic strength to evoke prolonged suprathreshold synaptic responses in these neuron classes. Subthreshold responses showed that inputs from either source functionally mix up in their dendrites at similar electrotonic distances from their somata. Passive and active properties of striatal neuron classes were consistent with the previous studies. Cre-dependent adeno-associated viruses containing Td-Tomato or eYFP fluorescent proteins were used to identify target cells. Transfections with ChR2-eYFP driven by the promoters CamKII or EF1.DIO in intralaminar thalamic nuclei using Vglut-2-Cre mice, or CAMKII in the motor cortex were used to stimulate cortical or thalamic afferents optogenetically. Both field stimuli in the cortex or photostimulation of ChR2-YFP cortical fibers evoked similar prolonged suprathreshold responses in SPNs. Photostimulation of ChR2-YFP thalamic afferents also evoked suprathreshold responses. Differences previously described between responses of dSPNs and iSPNs were observed in both cases. Prolonged suprathreshold responses could also be evoked from both sources onto all other neuron classes studied. However, to evoke thalamostriatal suprathreshold responses, afferents from more than one thalamic nucleus had to be stimulated. In conclusion, both thalamus and cortex are capable to generate suprathreshold responses converging on diverse striatal cell classes. Postsynaptic properties appear to shape these responses.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Corpus Striatum/cytology , Neural Pathways/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Synaptic Potentials/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Choline O-Acetyltransferase/metabolism , Electric Stimulation , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/pharmacology , Female , Luminescent Proteins/genetics , Luminescent Proteins/metabolism , Lysine/analogs & derivatives , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Neurons/drug effects , Synaptic Potentials/drug effects , Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2/genetics , Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2/metabolism
2.
J Neurosci ; 35(19): 7552-64, 2015 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25972180

ABSTRACT

The acquisition of distinct neuronal fates is fundamental for the function of the cerebral cortex. We find that the development of subcerebral projections from layer 5 neurons in the mouse neocortex depends on the high levels of expression of the transcription factor CTIP1; CTIP1 is coexpressed with CTIP2 in neurons that project to subcerebral targets and with SATB2 in those that project to the contralateral cortex. CTIP1 directly represses Tbr1 in layer 5, which appears as a critical step for the acquisition of the subcerebral fate. In contrast, lower levels of CTIP1 in layer 6 are required for TBR1 expression, which directs the corticothalamic fate. CTIP1 does not appear to play a critical role in the acquisition of the callosal projection fate in layer 5. These findings unravel a key step in the acquisition of cell fate for closely related corticofugal neurons and indicate that differential dosages of transcriptions factors are critical to specify different neuronal identities.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Cerebral Cortex/cytology , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Neural Pathways/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Cerebral Cortex/embryology , Cerebral Cortex/growth & development , Doublecortin Domain Proteins , Embryo, Mammalian , Female , Histones/metabolism , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins , T-Box Domain Proteins/metabolism
3.
Neuropharmacology ; 89: 232-44, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25290553

ABSTRACT

Models of basal ganglia (BG) function posit a dynamic balance between two classes of striatal projection neurons (SPNs): direct pathway neurons (dSPNs) that facilitate movements, and indirect pathway neurons (iSPNs) that repress movement execution. Two main modulatory transmitters regulate the output of these neurons: dopamine (DA) and acetylcholine (ACh). dSPNs express D1-type DA, M1-and M4-type ACh receptors, while iSPNs express D2-type DA and M1-type ACh receptors. Actions of M1-, D1-, and D2-receptors have been extensively reported, but we still ignore most actions of muscarinic M4-type receptors. Here, we used whole-cell recordings in acutely dissociated neurons, pharmacological tools such as mamba-toxins, and BAC D(1 or 2)-eGFP transgenic mice to show that activation of M4-type receptors with bath applied muscarine enhances Ca(2+)-currents through CaV1-channels in dSPNs and not in iSPNs. This action increases excitability of dSPNs after both direct current injection and synaptically driven stimulation. The increases in Ca(2+)-current and excitability were blocked specifically by mamba toxin-3, suggesting mediation via M4-type receptors. M4-receptor activation also increased network activity of dSPNs but not of iSPNs as seen with calcium-imaging techniques. Moreover, actions of D1-type and M4-type receptors may add to produce a larger enhancement of excitability of dSPNs or, paradoxically, oppose each other depending on the order of their activation. Possible implications of these findings are discussed.


Subject(s)
Corpus Striatum/cytology , Neural Pathways/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Receptor, Muscarinic M4/metabolism , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Animals , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Cells, Cultured , Dopamine/pharmacology , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Membrane Potentials/drug effects , Membrane Potentials/genetics , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Neurons/drug effects , Nicardipine/pharmacology , Receptors, Dopamine D1/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D2/genetics , Sodium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Tetrodotoxin/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL