Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 15: 21514593241228073, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250320

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The complication of delirium for hip fracture patients is a predictor of mortality. Use of opioid medication increases the incidence of delirium in the pre- and postoperative periods. Regional nerve blocks are effective in managing acute pain for acute hip fractures. This study aims to evaluate the utilization of ED physicians to perform fascia iliaca nerve blocks on hip fracture patients to decrease the incidence of delirium by decreasing usage of opioid medication. Methods: A quality improvement project for performing regional nerve blocks on patients with femoral neck fractures was implemented during fiscal year 2019. Data was collected retrospectively for frequency of ED nerve block procedures, amount of opioid medication use, and incidence of delirium in patients diagnosed with hip fracture. This data was compared to baseline data to determine success of the intervention. Results: Utilization of regional nerve blocks in the ED increased from 2% in 2018 to 96% in 2021 and 89% in 2022. Preoperative opioid usage decreased from 38 MMEs to 16.9 and 18 MMEs respectively. Daily average MMEs decreased from 34 to 12.1 and 14 respectively. Postoperative delirium decreased from 6% in 2018 to 0% from 2020 to 2022. Discussion: ED provider administration of fascia iliaca blocks and follow-up is a novel practice in our region to decrease the adverse effects of opiate use and decrease delirium rates. There was a reduction in length of stay and increased discharge home rate despite the Covid-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Administration of regional nerve blocks by ED physicians to hip fracture patients presenting to the ED results in a decrease in opioid medication usage. This also results in a decreased delirium rates in the hip fracture patient population.

2.
Cureus ; 15(7): e42540, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37637569

ABSTRACT

Every day, people of all ages in the United States break bones, with traumatic injury being the most common way, and wrist injury being in the top five most common areas in which bones break. Traumatic fractures are managed with either surgical or nonsurgical approaches. The surgical approach utilizes ortho procedures such as internal fixation and reduction, while the nonsurgical approach consists of procedures like RICE, ace bandage, and so on. However, in rare cases, patients are left with a peculiar constellation of symptoms, which cause edema, pain, skin changes, and loss of function at the trauma site. This occurrence is termed complex regional pain syndrome. Here, we present the case of a 55-year-old female patient who suffered a traumatic wrist injury. The trauma was fixed by pinning ORIF orthopedic surgery, and the patient developed manifestations of complex regional pain syndrome around 10 days postoperatively. In this case report, we describe the variation and complexity of symptoms in the patient over the course of a decade after the original injury. The case report explains the pain management therapies that reduced the patient's symptoms and highlights the ones that were ineffective. We have included some less frequently used yet effective treatments and shed light on how this disease affected the patient's overall well-being.

3.
Scott Med J ; : 369330231193624, 2023 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37551581

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to generate collated evidence on the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for pain control after hip surgeries. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published on the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Open Gray up to 4 March 2023 and comparing ESPB with placebo for pain control after hip surgeries were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: We included five RCTs. Meta-analysis showed that ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at 1 h (mean difference [MD]: -1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.69, -0.40; I2 = 35%; p = 0.01), 3 h (MD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.86, -0.03; I2 = 78%; p = 0.04), and 6 h (MD: -0.94; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.10; I2 = 73%; p = 0.03). However, no difference was noted for 12 h (MD: -0.33; 95% CI: -2.20, 1.53; I2 = 97%; p = 0.73) and 24 h pain scores (MD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.58, 0.68; I2 = 71%; p = 0.87); 24 h total opioid consumption was not significantly different with ESPB and placebo (MD: -9.26; 95% CI: -24.49, 5.98; I2 = 94%; p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Scarce evidence shows that ESPB may not provide adequate pain control after hip surgeries. No difference in 24-h pain scores and total opioid consumption was noted between ESPB and placebo. Further RCTs shall strengthen available evidence.

4.
JSES Int ; 7(3): 427-431, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37266169

ABSTRACT

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) provides high analgesic efficacy for postoperative pain. However, different drug efficacies remain unclear. This retrospective study compared the efficacy of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in a single-dose ISB for pain control after ARCR. Methods: This study included 173 patients who underwent ARCR; they were divided into the ISBR group (n = 61) that received ISB with 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine and 3.3 mg dexamethasone, and the ISBL group (n = 112) that received ISB with 20 mL 0.25% levobupivacaine and 3.3 mg dexamethasone. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were evaluated at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, postoperatively. Rebound pain was defined as a difference of ≥ 5 points between the highest and lowest VAS pain scores. Results: The mean VAS pain scores at 1 hour were not significantly different between the groups. ISBL administration resulted in significantly lower VAS pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours than ISBR administration. Rebound pain rates in the ISBR and ISBL groups were 41.0% and 17.9%, respectively. Rebound pain was more frequent in the ISBR than in the ISBL group. Conclusion: ISB with levobupivacaine and dexamethasone can provide more effective postoperative pain control after ARCR than ropivacaine and dexamethasone.

5.
J Pediatr Urol ; 19(4): 374-379, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002025

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of caudal anesthesia at the time of hypospadias repair remains controversial as some prior studies have reported increased postoperative complication rates associated with caudal nerve block. However, these results have been called into question due to confounding factors and heterogeneous study groups. OBJECTIVE: Given the importance of identifying true risk factors associated with increased hypospadias complication rate, we examined our experience with caudal anesthesia limiting our analysis to distal repairs. We hypothesized that caudal anesthesia would not be associated with increased postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional hypospadias database from June 2007 to January 2021. All boys who underwent single-stage distal hypospadias repair with either caudal or penile block with minimum 1 month follow up were included. Records were reviewed to determine the type of local anesthesia, type of hypospadias repair, all complications, and time to complication. Association between any complication and local anesthesia type was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for age at surgery and type of repair. A sub-analysis was performed for complications occurring ≤30 days. RESULTS: Overall, 1008 boys, 832 (82.5%) who received caudal and 176 (17.5%) penile block, were included. Median age at surgery was 8.1 months and median follow up was 13 months. Overall complication rate was 16.4% with 13.8% of patients requiring repeat operation. Median time to complication was 10.59 months and was significantly shorter in the caudal group (8.45 vs. 25.2 months). Caudal anesthesia was associated with higher likelihood of complication on univariate analysis; however, this was not true on multivariate analysis when controlling for age and type of repair. Caudal anesthesia was not associated with increased likelihood of complication within 30 days. DISCUSSION: Since the association between caudal anesthesia and hypospadias complications was first suggested, several studies have tried to answer this question with variable results. Our findings add to the evidence that there is no association between caudal anesthesia and increased hypospadias complications in either the short or long term. The major strengths of our study are a large, homogenous study population, robust follow up and inclusion of data from 14 surgeons over 14 years. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature as well as lack of standardized follow up protocol throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for possible confounders, caudal nerve block was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complications following distal hypospadias repair.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Caudal , Hypospadias , Male , Humans , Infant , Hypospadias/surgery , Hypospadias/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Urethra , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Anesthesia, Caudal/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(6): 3535-3540, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35996031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion following total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to be problematic. The best choice of anesthesia (spinal vs general) and impact of tranexamic acid (TXA) use in reducing transfusions following surgery remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare rates of blood transfusion following THA via the anterior approach using three different anesthesia protocols with and without TXA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 1399 patients (1659 hips), receiving spinal anesthesia (SA) without (248 patients) and with TXA (77 patients), general anesthesia (GA) without (151 patients) and with TXA (171) and general anesthesia with paravertebral block (GA-PVB) and TXA (748 patients). All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Chi-Squared tests and logistic regression were performed to evaluate the rate and risks of transfusion between groups. RESULTS: Without TXA, transfusion rate with GA (24.5%) was higher than SA (13.4%) (p = 0.004). With TXA, there was no difference in transfusion rates between GA (4.6%), SA (3.9%) or GA-PVB (4.0%). The multivariable regression revealed bilateral (Odds Ratio (OR): 6.473; p < 0.001), female (OR: 2.046; p = 0.004), age (OR: 1.028; p = 0.012) and pre-operative anemia (OR: 2.604; p < 0.001) as increasing the risk of transfusion while use of TXA (OR: 0.168; p < 0.001) significantly reduced transfusion risk. CONCLUSION: The use of TXA during THA via the anterior approach removed the influence of anesthesia type regarding risk of transfusion. The use of TXA may reverse presumed disadvantages of GA alone, potentially facilitating rapid discharge following surgery.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Female , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Blood Transfusion , Anesthesia, General , Retrospective Studies
7.
Cureus ; 15(11): e49670, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161914

ABSTRACT

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a widely employed surgical intervention for managing advanced shoulder arthritis. Postoperatively, patients frequently experience intense pain, particularly within the first 48 hours. Effective pain management through regional analgesia not only facilitates a quicker hospital discharge but also minimizes the reliance on opioids. One such regional analgesic approach is the combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block, which targets the glenohumeral joint, rotator cuff muscles, and the shoulder's lateral region for effective pain alleviation. Previous research indicates that this dual nerve block method offers sustained pain relief while circumventing the respiratory complications commonly associated with interscalene brachial plexus blocks, which may inadvertently block the phrenic nerve and affect respiration. We report the case of a 75-year-old female, diagnosed with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis on multiple inhalers, who presented for RTSA. The patient had a strong desire to avoid opioids for pain control due to adverse side effects. Through a suprascapular nerve catheter and axillary nerve single shot, regional analgesia was administered, which minimized the risk of respiratory complications due to potential phrenic nerve involvement from an interscalene approach. There were no opioids taken in the postoperative period after discharge, and the patient only received oral acetaminophen. The patient experienced a successful recovery without any respiratory complications and was extremely satisfied with her management.

8.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(10): 1906-1921.e2, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36162923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regional nerve blocks are widely used in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional nerve blocks after TKA in support of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published before March 24, 2020 on femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, and infiltration between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of Knee in primary TKA. All included studies underwent qualitative and quantitative homogeneity testing followed by a systematic review and direct comparison meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the regional nerve blocks compared to a control, local peri-articular anesthetic infiltration (PAI), or between regional nerve blocks. RESULTS: Critical appraisal of 1,673 publications yielded 56 publications representing the best available evidence for analysis. Femoral nerve and adductor canal blocks are effective at reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption, but femoral nerve blocks are associated with quadriceps weakness. Use of a continuous compared to single shot adductor canal block can improve postoperative analgesia. No difference was noted between an adductor canal block or PAI regarding postoperative pain and opioid consumption, but the combination of both may be more effective. CONCLUSION: Single shot adductor canal block or PAI should be used to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption following TKA. Use of a continuous adductor canal block or a combination of single shot adductor canal block and PAI may improve postoperative analgesia in patients with concern of poor postoperative pain control.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Nerve Block , Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthetics, Local , Femoral Nerve , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
9.
Cureus ; 14(4): e24031, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35547402

ABSTRACT

We present a case of a 60-year-old male who has undergone Achilles' tendon repair with amnion augmentation on the right side. Before the surgery, liposomal bupivacaine was requested by the patient, and this was used to block the popliteal and adductor canal nerves for intraoperative anesthetic and postoperative pain control. The patient understood the benefits and risks of the regional nerve block with this medication and its off-label use. After the surgery, the patient underwent an irregular course of anesthetic, including delayed motor weakness, and became non-weight-bearing temporarily. The motor block was inconsistent and non-linear. Initially, the motor block completely resolved with a return to the sensation after three days. Then, on day four, a complete motor block developed, which resolved gradually over the next four days. After 10 days, the patient had full resolution of symptoms. He denies any pain since the surgery.

10.
World Neurosurg ; 162: 43-46, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Elective insertion of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring bolts is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Patients typically report severe discomfort on bolt removal, which negatively impacts overall patient satisfaction of ICP monitoring. We assessed the efficacy and safety of using supratrochlear and supraorbital nerve block-a commonly used form of scalp anesthesia-alongside oral analgesia before bolt removal. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and safety of regional scalp block anesthesia alongside oral analgesia versus oral analgesia alone in a cohort of 85 patients undergoing removal of diagnostic ICP bolts between June 2017 and April 2019 using retrospective patient questionnaires, as well as electronic admission documentation. RESULTS: We found that scalp block alongside oral analgesia improved bolt removal experience (4/5 vs. 3/5 on a 1-5 point Likert scale) and that a majority (70.6%) of patients would have preferred local anesthetic before removal in the oral analgesia-only group. Only 2 patients experienced mild and localized side effects: mild bruising and temporary facial and eyelid swelling following regional scalp block. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that regional supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve block is a simple, safe, and effective adjunct to minimizing discomfort during bolt removal and improving overall patient satisfaction of ICP monitoring.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction , Scalp , Anesthetics, Local , Humans , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Retrospective Studies
11.
Acta Clin Croat ; 61(Suppl 2): 103-108, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36824638

ABSTRACT

Cancer pain is not a homogenous and clearly understood pathological process. The best treatment is a combination of drug and non-drug measures. Pain is divided into visceral, bone or neuropathic pain and has characteristics of continuous or intermittent pain. Cancer bone pain therapy remains centered on strong opioid, radiotherapy and bisphosphonates. Invasive procedures are aimed to improve neurological function, ambulation and pain relief. Solid tumors often demand surgery. Treatment of acute postoperative pain is crucial for the prevention of chronic pain. Chemotherapy and radiation sometimes also cause pain. The management of cancer pain has improved because of rapid diagnosis and treatment, understanding of analgesics and the cooperation of patients and their family. The presence of special pain centers in hospitals also raise standard of cancer pain management. Drug therapy with non-opioid, opioid and adjuvant drugs is the base of such management. The side effects must be monitored and timely treated. Methods of regional nerve blockade in pain control are numerous. Placement of epidural, intrathecal and subcutaneous catheters, conductive nerve blocks with continuous delivery of mixed local anesthetics are very successful for selected patients. Conventional physical therapy involving lymphatic drainage is useful. Acupuncture, psychotherapy and similar methods are also applicable.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain , Chronic Pain , Neoplasms , Humans , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Pain Management , Analgesics, Opioid , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Anesthetics, Local
12.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 108(1): 103151, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34826609

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With minimal systemic toxicity, an analgesic effect of regional nerve block (RNB) has been proved in hip fracture cases. Analgesia was expected to reduce delirium by controlling pain, a known predisposing factor for delirium. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of RNB on delirium after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. We aimed to answer the question: Can regional nerve block reduce postoperative delirium in hip fracture patients? HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis was that RNB could reduce postoperative delirium after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically for studies published before September 9, 2020, investigating the effect of RNB on perioperative delirium after hip fracture in elderly patients. We performed synthetic analyses for overall RNB compared to a control group both in 1) overall elderly patients, including the cognitively impaired, and 2) for patients without cognitive impairment (CoI). Also, we performed subgroup analyses for each of the block techniques, such as fascia-iliac block (FIB) and femoral nerve block (FNB). RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials compared the incidence of perioperative delirium between the RNB and control groups. A pooled analysis showed no differences in delirium incidence between the RNB and control groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.22; p=0.18; I2=58%) in overall elderly patients. However, there was a significant reduction of delirium in the RNB group in patients without CoI (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21-0.94; p=0.03; I2=51%). In the subgroup analyses, we were unable to discern any differences in delirium incidence between the groups for FIB (OR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.19-4.19; p=0.88; I2=78%) and FNB (OR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.31-1.20, p=0.15, I2=47%). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of hip fracture in elderly, RNB demonstrated a preventive effect on perioperative delirium for patients without preoperative CoI. No significant reduction in perioperative delirium was observed when cognitively impaired patients were included.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Hip Fractures , Nerve Block , Aged , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/prevention & control , Hip Fractures/complications , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
13.
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics ; (12): 443-446, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-933102

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the effect of regional nerve block anesthesia for elderly patients with traumatic tibia and fibula fractures.Methods:Ninety-three elderly patients with tibia and fibula fractures undergone surgical treatment were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 47 and 46 patients, respectively, in each group.The control group received general anesthesia and the observation group received a regional nerve block.Results:There was no difference in operative time between the two groups[(42.2±5.4)min and(43.3±5.7)min, t=0.953, P=0.343].The time to recovery of consciousness[(11.2±2.6)min and(14.5±2.8)min, t=5.714, P<0.001]and the volume of intraoperative infusion[(415.6±27.5)ml/L and(686.6±36.3)ml/L, t=40.626, P<0.001]were lower and patients' blood pressure and respiratory rate were also lower at skin incision, fracture fixation, end of surgery and 30 min after surgery in the observation group than in the control group.The levels of Glu, IL-6 and COR were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05).The incidence of complications was 2.13% in the observation group and 15.22% in the control group( χ2=5.07, P<0.05). Conclusions:Elderly patients with traumatic tibia and fibula fractures receive beneficial anesthetic effects with the regional nerve block technique, with stable hemodynamics, mild stress response and minor adverse reactions.

14.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19606, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34926075

ABSTRACT

We present two patients who underwent double mastectomy and breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The goal of this case series was to compare surgeon-provided infiltration block against anesthesiologist-provided regional nerve block, focusing on abdominal analgesia. This case report highlights that pain control for a patient could be successful when done collaboratively. To achieve this, it is important for both the surgical and anesthesia team to discuss the best analgesic plan for the patient while taking into consideration the confidence, experience, and technique that both the surgical and anesthesiology team can offer.

15.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 36(3): 291-299.e3, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33500169

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate aromatherapy for postoperative abdominal pain in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial design. METHODS: Study participants (n = 172) were randomized to receive either standard care or standard care and aromatherapy (AT) for postsurgical pain up to 24 hours after admission to a nonintensive care surgical unit. A convenience sample was recruited before surgery and given instructions on self-rating pain intensity. The AT group was topically administered a drop of lavender essential oil after medication and at random for pain. Pain scores and medications data were collected. FINDINGS: Of the evaluable patients (n = 147), demographic data were similar (standard care and AT groups). The use of aromatherapy showed no substantial benefit at improving pain scores or reducing medication use (the primary objectives of the study). A subgroup analysis of patients who received a regional nerve block for pain management, however, showed more than fivefold improvement in pain scores after the use of aromatherapy. The AT group used more medications at baseline (P = .032), whereas 70% less medications were used (P = .031) by 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Aromatherapy aided in control of pain intensity for abdominal surgical patients. In patients who received a regional nerve block, significant improvement in pain level occurred as effects of the block diminished.


Subject(s)
Aromatherapy , Lavandula , Humans , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
16.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 6: 2382120519885638, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31799406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Arthrocentesis of the ankle and elbow and brachial plexus nerve blocks are infrequently performed procedures; however, clinicians in specialties such as emergency medicine are required to be proficient in these procedures in the event of emergent or urgent necessity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to create, implement, and assess a fresh cadaver-based educational model to help resident physicians learn how to perform ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis of the ankle and elbow and ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks. METHODS: This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at an academic medical center. After a brief didactic session, 26 emergency medicine residents with varying levels of clinical and ultrasound experience rotated through 4 fresh cadaver-based stations. The objective of each station was to understand the sonographic anatomy and to perform ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis or regional nerve block with hands-on feedback from ultrasound fellows and faculty. Participants were subsequently asked to complete a questionnaire which evaluated participants' experience level, opinions, and procedural confidence regarding the 4 stations. RESULTS: A total of 26 residents participated in this study. All 26 residents agreed that the cadaver model (compared with clinical anatomy) was realistic regarding ultrasound quality of the joint space, ultrasound quality of the joint effusion, ultrasound quality of nerves, tissue density, needle guidance, and artifacts. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference between mean scores for pre-simulation and post-simulation session participant procedural confidence for all 4 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This fresh cadaver-based ultrasound-guided educational model was an engaging and well-received opportunity for residents to gain proficiency and statistically significant confidence in procedures which are uncommonly performed in clinical settings.

17.
J Vet Dent ; 36(1): 46-51, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138051

ABSTRACT

Blinded techniques to desensitize the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) include intraoral, angled, and vertical extraoral approaches with reported success rates of 100%, 73%, and 59%, respectively. It has not been determined whether an ultrasound-guided extraoral approach is feasible. Further, the fascicular nature of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves of the horse has not been described. The objectives of this study were to describe a low-volume ultrasound-guided vertical extraoral inferior alveolar nerve block technique and to describe the fascicular nature of these nerves. An ultrasound-guided approach to the IAN was conducted with a microconvex transducer and an 18-G, 15-cm spinal needle using a solution containing iodinated-contrast and methylene blue dye. Accuracy was assessed by contrast visualized at the mandibular foramen on computed tomography (CT) and methylene blue dye staining of the nerves on gross dissection. Sections of inferior alveolar and lingual nerves were submitted for histological analysis. Assessment by CT and dissection determined success rates of 81.3% and 68.8%, respectively; 68.8% of injections had inadvertent methylene blue dye staining of the lingual nerve. Nerve histology revealed both the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves to be multifascicular in nature. Mean fascicle counts for the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves were 29 and 30.8, respectively. The technique is challenging and no more accurate than previously published blinded techniques. Any extraoral approach to the IAN is likely to also desensitize the lingual nerve.


Subject(s)
Horses/surgery , Lingual Nerve/surgery , Mandibular Nerve/surgery , Nerve Block/veterinary , Ultrasonography/veterinary , Animals , Cadaver , Lingual Nerve/drug effects , Lingual Nerve/physiology , Mandibular Nerve/drug effects , Mandibular Nerve/physiology , Nerve Block/instrumentation , Nerve Block/methods
18.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao ; 41(6): 871-874, 2019 Dec 30.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31907142

ABSTRACT

Interfascial plane block is a quick,safe and simple technique that offers effective analgesia for video-assisted thoracotomy.However,the currently described methods still have certain limitations.We explored the application of a novel interfascial plane block method-iliocostal plane block in video-assisted thoracotomy,along with the use of stained cadaveric anatomy,with an attempt to shed new light on the analgesia for video-assisted thoracotomy.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Humans , Thoracotomy
19.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-781646

ABSTRACT

Interfascial plane block is a quick,safe and simple technique that offers effective analgesia for video-assisted thoracotomy.However,the currently described methods still have certain limitations.We explored the application of a novel interfascial plane block method-iliocostal plane block in video-assisted thoracotomy,along with the use of stained cadaveric anatomy,with an attempt to shed new light on the analgesia for video-assisted thoracotomy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia , Thoracotomy
20.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(7): 1243-1250, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29605659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus bolus blockade (IBPBB) and patient-controlled interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia (PCIA) for postoperative pain management within 48 hours postoperatively in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (ARCR). METHODS: Patients undergoing ARCR were randomized into 3 groups by postoperative analgesia method. The IBPBB group received a mixed solution of 16 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine and 4 mL of 2% lidocaine as a bolus postoperatively. The PCIA group received a 10-mL bolus solution of 0.75% ropivacaine (4 mL) and 5% dextrose water (6 mL) just after the operation and continuous infusion of this solution. The control received only meperidine as needed, 12.5 mg, intravenously. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were evaluated for the first 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: For the first 2 hours postoperatively, VAS scores in the IBPBB group were significantly lower than in the PCIA group and control group, but at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively, VAS scores of the IBPBB group were significantly higher than the PCIA group (P < .05). At 48 hours postoperatively, there was no significant difference in VAS scores among the 3 groups (P = .169). The method of analgesia was the only factor affecting pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: IBPBB provided effective immediate postoperative analgesia until 6 hours postoperatively. Especially until postoperative 2 hours, the VAS pain score was less than 1 point in the IBPBB group; however, there was significant rebound pain at 12 hours after surgery. During the first 24 hours postoperatively, PCIA reduced postoperative pain without rebound pain. Surgeons should choose methods for control of postoperative pain considering the advantages and disadvantages of each analgesic method.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Aged , Amides , Anesthetics, Local , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling , Female , Humans , Lidocaine , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prospective Studies , Ropivacaine , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...