Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.034
Filter
1.
China CDC Wkly ; 6(26): 624-628, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966308

ABSTRACT

What is already known about this topic?: Both the decline in immunity over time and the evolution of the virus play a role in the level of protection offered by a prior infection. What is added by this report?: Point estimates indicated variations in protection levels based on the initial infecting variant and the reinfecting variant. There was a consistent correlation between real-world protection, antigenic distance, and humoral immunity levels. Specifically, shorter antigenic distances and higher humoral immunity levels corresponded to enhanced real-world protection. What are the implications for public health practice?: Our findings suggest that virological and immunological studies could help identify and assess the epidemic risk posed by new variants before they become dominant. Prompt incorporation of the latest variants into the antigen components of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines can significantly contribute to effective epidemic prevention and control measures.

2.
Virology ; 597: 110142, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959723

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The specific humoral immune response resulting from inactivated vaccination following by BA.5 infection, and predictors of XBB variants re-infection in BA.5 infection-recovered nasopharyngeal carcinoma (BA.5-RNPC) patients, were explored. METHODS: Serum SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels were assessed using enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the magnitude of specific humoral immunity and susceptibility to re-infection by XBB variants. RESULTS: Our data demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels were comparable between BA.5-RNPC patients and BA.5 infection-recovered-non-cancerous (BA.5-RNC) individuals. Specifically, serum levels of anti-ancestral-S1-IgG, anti-ancestral-nucleocapsid-protein (NP)-IgG, anti-BA.5-receptor binding domain (RBD)-IgG and anti-XBB.1.1.6-RBD-IgG were higher in BA.5-RNPC patients compared to those without a prior infection. Compared to BA.5-RNPC patients without vaccination, individuals who received inactivated vaccination exhibited significantly higher levels of anti-ancestral-S1-IgG and anti-XBB.1.16-RBD-IgG. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that inactivated vaccination was the most significant predictor of all tested SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies response. Subsequent analysis indicated that a low globulin level is an independent risk factor for XBB re-infection in BA.5-RNPC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies have been improved in vaccinated BA.5-RNPC patients. However, the baseline immunity status biomarker IgG is an indicators of XBB variant re-infection risk in BA.5-RNPC patients.

3.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1366540, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952434

ABSTRACT

Background: Two significant etiological factors contributing to iron deficiency anemia, and undernutrition posing substantial public health challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa, are soil-transmitted helminths and malaria. This study carried out the effect of weekly iron-folic acid supplementation (WIFAS) on the nutrition and general health of school-age children and adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa, a systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted. Methods: To find pertinent publications for this study, a thorough search was carried out on May 20, 2023, across five databases: Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. In addition, a search was conducted on August 23, 2023, to capture any new records. The inclusion criteria for the studies were based on school-age children and adolescent populations, randomized controlled trials, and investigations into the effects of WIFAS. The outcomes of interest were measured through anthropometric changes, malaria, and helminthic reinfection. Results: A systematic review of 11 articles revealed that WIFAS significantly decreased the risk of schistosomiasis reinfection by 21% among adolescents (risk ratio = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.66, 0.97; heterogeneity I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.02). However, no significant impact was observed on the risk of malaria reinfection (risk ratio = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.92, 1.13; heterogeneity I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.67) or A. Lumbricoides reinfection (risk ratio = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.19; heterogeneity I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.65). Moreover, the analysis demonstrated that there is no significant effect of iron-folic acid supplementation in measured height and height for age Z-score (HAZ) of the school-age children (Hedge's g -0.05, 95%CI: -0.3, 0.2; test for heterogeneity I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.7) and (Hedge's g 0.12, 95%CI: -0.13, 0.37; test for heterogeneity I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.36) respectively. Conclusion: The effectiveness of WIFAS in reducing the risk of schistosomiasis reinfection in adolescents has been demonstrated to be greater than that of a placebo or no intervention. Additionally, the narrative synthesis of iron-folic acid supplementation has emerged as a potential public health intervention for promoting weight change. However, there was no significant association between WIFAS and Ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Moreover, the certainty of the evidence for the effects of WIFAS on height and malaria is low and therefore inconclusive. Whereas, the certainty of the evidence for the effectiveness of WIFAS on Schistosomiasis is moderate. Even though the mechanisms need further research WIFAS may be implemented as part of a comprehensive public health strategy to address schistosomiasis in adolescents. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023397898, PROSPERO (CRD42023397898).

4.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 24(7): 964-974, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956787

ABSTRACT

The prolonged consequences of SARS-CoV-2 on young elite athletes recovering from primary and reinfection are unclear. This study aimed to assess inspiratory/expiratory muscle strength and respiratory function at the time of spontaneous recovery at 3, 6, and 9 months after SARS-CoV-2 primary and reinfection in elite athletes. The study enrolled 25 elite male judoists, including 11 primary infection cases, five reinfection cases, and nine controls from the Türkiye Olympic Preparation Center. Inspiratory/expiratory muscle strength and respiratory function were measured, including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) before and up to 9 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early pre-competition preparation phases. The most common symptoms reported by reinfection cases were fatigue (80%), dyspnea (60%), and muscle/joint pain (60%), while primary infection cases reported fatigue (73%), muscle/joint pain (45%), and headache (45%). MIP decreased by -14% and MEP decreased by -13% following the SARS-CoV-2 infection in reinfection cases. Likewise, FEV1 and FVC decreased by -5% and -8%, respectively; consequently, FEV1/FVC increased by 3%. Inspiratory/expiratory muscle strength and respiratory function improved rapidly after 9 months of SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary cases, whereas dysfunction persisted in reinfection cases. PEF was unaffected throughout the 9-month follow-up period. Reinfection may lead to further alterations in respiratory system relative to the primary infection, with a suspected restrictive pattern that remains dysfunctional in the third month; however, it improves significantly during a 9-month follow-up period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Muscle Strength , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Muscle Strength/physiology , Young Adult , Respiratory Muscles/physiology , Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology , Athletes , Athletic Performance/physiology , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiratory Function Tests , Fatigue/physiopathology , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Adolescent , Vital Capacity , Headache , Forced Expiratory Volume
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 459, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess pregnancy outcomes in women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women who contracted coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) once or twice during pregnancy and who gave birth between 1 October 2022 and 15 August 2023 in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (Shanghai, China). We collected their clinical data and compared the frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes between the reinfection group and the primary infection group, such as preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (FGR), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), common pregnancy-related conditions, birth weight, and neonatal unit admission. RESULTS: We observed a 7.7% reinfection rate among the 1,405 women who contracted COVID-19 during pregnancy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of preterm birth, FGR, HDP, other common pregnancy-related conditions, birth weight, or rate of neonatal unit admission between the reinfection and single infection groups. All our participants were unvaccinated, and all had mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study showed no significant association between SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy Outcome , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Reinfection/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1403769, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947319

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Follicular helper T cells are essential for helping in the maturation of B cells and the production of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) during primary viral infections. However, their role during recall responses is unclear. Here, we used hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in humans as a model to study the recall collaborative interaction between circulating CD4 T follicular helper cells (cTfh) and memory B cells (MBCs) leading to the generation of NAbs. Methods: We evaluated this interaction longitudinally in subjects who have spontaneously resolved primary HCV infection during a subsequent reinfection episode that resulted in either another spontaneous resolution (SR/SR, n = 14) or chronic infection (SR/CI, n = 8). Results: Both groups exhibited virus-specific memory T cells that expanded upon reinfection. However, early expansion of activated cTfh (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+ICOS+FoxP3-) occurred in SR/SR only. The frequency of activated cTfh negatively correlated with time post-infection. Concomitantly, NAbs and HCV-specific MBCs (CD19+CD27+IgM-E2-Tet+) peaked during the early acute phase in SR/SR but not in SR/CI. Finally, the frequency of the activated cTfh1 (CXCR3+CCR6-) subset correlated with the neutralization breadth and potency of NAbs. Conclusion: These results underscore a key role for early activation of cTfh1 cells in helping antigen-specific B cells to produce NAbs that mediate the clearance of HCV reinfection.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Memory B Cells , Reinfection , T Follicular Helper Cells , Humans , Hepacivirus/immunology , T Follicular Helper Cells/immunology , Male , Female , Hepatitis C/immunology , Hepatitis C/virology , Memory B Cells/immunology , Adult , Middle Aged , Reinfection/immunology , Reinfection/virology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Immunologic Memory , Hepatitis C Antibodies/immunology , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis C, Chronic/immunology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Lymphocyte Activation/immunology
7.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1353415, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966699

ABSTRACT

Background: The protective effectiveness provided by naturally acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection remain controversial. Objective: To systematically evaluate the protective effect of natural immunity against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection with different variants. Methods: We searched for related studies published in seven databases before March 5, 2023. Eligible studies included in the analysis reported the risk of subsequent infection for groups with or without a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was the overall pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection/infection between the two groups. We also focused on the protective effectiveness of natural immunity against reinfection/infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants. We used a random-effects model to pool the data, and obtained the bias-adjusted results using the trim-and-fill method. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding included studies one by one to evaluate the stability of the results. Results: We identified 40 eligible articles including more than 20 million individuals without the history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The bias-adjusted efficacy of naturally acquired antibodies against reinfection was estimated at 65% (pooled IRR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.26-0.47), with higher efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 cases (pooled IRR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.08-0.26) than asymptomatic infection (pooled IRR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54). Meta-regression revealed that SARS-CoV-2 variant was a statistically significant effect modifier, which explaining 46.40% of the variation in IRRs. For different SARS-CoV-2 variant, the pooled IRRs for the Alpha (pooled IRR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.06-0.19), Delta (pooled IRR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.15-0.24) and Omicron (pooled IRR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87) variant were higher and higher. In other subgroup analyses, the pooled IRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were statistically various in different countries, publication year and the inclusion end time of population, with a significant difference (p = 0.02, p < 0.010 and p < 0.010), respectively. The risk of subsequent infection in the seropositive population appeared to increase slowly over time. Despite the heterogeneity in included studies, sensitivity analyses showed stable results. Conclusion: Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against pre-omicron reinfection, but less against omicron. Ongoing viral mutation requires attention and prevention strategies, such as vaccine catch-up, in conjunction with multiple factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Immunity, Innate
8.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932151

ABSTRACT

Treatment of hepatitis C among people who inject drugs (PWID) may be complicated by loss to follow-up and reinfection. We aimed to evaluate sustained virologic response (SVR) and reinfection, and to validate complete pharmacy dispensation as a proxy for cure among PWID enrolled in a trial of opportunistic HCV treatment. Data were obtained by reviewing the electronic patient files and supplemented by outreach HCV RNA testing. Reinfection was defined based on clinical, behavioral, and virological data. Intention to treat SVR ≥ 4 within 2 years after enrolment was accomplished by 59 of 98 (60% [95% CI 50-70]) during intervention conditions (opportunistic treatment) and by 57 of 102 (56% [95% CI 46-66]) during control conditions (outpatient treatment). The time to end of treatment response (ETR) or SVR ≥ 4 was shorter among intervention participants (HR 1.55 [1.08-2.22]; p = 0.016). Of participants with complete dispensation, 132 of 145 (91%) achieved ETR or SVR > 4 (OR 12.7 [95% CI 4.3-37.8]; p < 0.001). Four cases of reinfection were identified (incidence 3.8/100 PY [95% CI 1.0-9.7]). Although SVR was similar, the time to virologic cure was shorter among intervention participants. Complete dispensation is a valid correlate for cure among individuals at risk of loss to follow-up. Reinfection following successful treatment remains a concern.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Reinfection , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Sustained Virologic Response , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/virology , Treatment Outcome , Hospitalization , RNA, Viral/blood
9.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932249

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C (HCV) reinfection studies have not focused on primary healthcare services in Australia, where priority populations including people who inject drugs (PWID) typically engage in healthcare. We aimed to describe the incidence of HCV reinfection and associated risk factors in a cohort of people most at risk of reinfection in a real-world community setting. We conducted a secondary analysis of routinely collected HCV testing and treatment data from treatment episodes initiated with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy between October 2015 and June 2021. The overall proportion of clients (N = 413) reinfected was 9% (N = 37), and the overall incidence rate of HCV reinfection was 9.5/100PY (95% CI: 6.3-14.3). Reinfection incidence rates varied by sub-group and were highest for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people (20.4/100PY; 95% CI: 12.1-34.4). Among PWID (N= 321), only Aboriginality was significantly associated with reinfection (AOR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.33-5.60, p = 0.006). High rates of HCV reinfection in populations with multiple vulnerabilities and continued drug use, especially among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, highlight the need for ongoing regular HCV testing and retreatment in order to achieve HCV elimination. A priority is resourcing testing and treatment for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people. Our findings support the need for novel and holistic healthcare strategies for PWID and the upscaling of Indigenous cultural approaches and interventions.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Primary Health Care , Reinfection , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Adult , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Australia/epidemiology , Reinfection/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Incidence , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
10.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(6)2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932411

ABSTRACT

During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic healthcare workers (HCWs) acquired immunity by vaccination or exposure to multiple variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Our study is a comparative analysis between subgroups of HCWs constructed based on the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, vaccination, and the dominant variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. We collected and analyzed data using the χ2 test and density incidence of reinfections in Microsoft Excel for Mac, Version 16.84, and MedCalc®, 22.026. Of the 829 HCWs, 70.1% (581) had only one SARS-CoV-2 infection and 29.9% (248) had two infections. Of the subjects with two infections, 77.4% (192) worked in high-risk departments and 93.2% (231) of the second infections were registered during Omicron dominance. The density incidence of reinfections was higher in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule than those vaccinated with the first booster, and the incidence ratio was 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2; 6.7). The probability of reinfection was five times lower (95% CI: 2.9; 9.2) in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule if the first infection was acquired during Omicron dominance. The subjects vaccinated with the first booster had a density incidence of reinfection three times lower (95% CI: 1.9; 5.8) if the first infection was during Omicron. The incidence ratio in subgroups constructed based on characteristics such as gender, age group, job category, and department also registered significant differences in density incidence. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection by variant is important when interpreting and understanding public health data and the results of studies related to vaccine efficacy for hybrid immunity subgroup populations.

11.
Virol J ; 21(1): 142, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910238

ABSTRACT

We describe the case of a 57-year-old male with jaundice, abdominal distension and fatigue. He was diagnosed as chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection (CAEBV) due to intermittent elevated liver enzymes, hepatosplenomegaly and pancytopenia, with persistent positive of EBV biomarkers in blood and also positive in liver tissue. The patient was reinfected by SARS-CoV-2 within 2 months companied with CAEBV. The patient's second infection with SARS-CoV-2 led to the aggravated liver dysfunction with pneumonia and re-admission. After receiving symptomatic treatment, the patient showed significantly improvement of symptoms with partially restoration of liver function. After discharge, the patient's health status continued to deteriorate and eventually died. The instances of SARS-CoV-2 co-infection with the original chronic virus are not uncommon, but the exact mechanism of EBV and SARS-CoV-2 coinfection and the relationship between them are still unclear. Since co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 with original chronic virus might affect each other and lead disease aggravated and complicated, it is necessary to differentiate in the diagnosis of disease and it is important to be aware of the re-infection signs of SARS-CoV-2 in people with chronic virus infection diseases, as well as the risk of co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 with other viruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/virology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/diagnosis , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/virology , Middle Aged , Reinfection/virology , Reinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/virology , Coinfection/diagnosis , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Chronic Disease , Fatal Outcome
12.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 137: 112382, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875995

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) can give rise to all kinds of immune cells including neutrophils. Neutrophils are the first line of defense in the innate immune system with a short lifespan, due to which it is well-accepted that neutrophils have no immune memory. However, recent reports showed that the changes in HSPCs induced by primary stimulation could last a long time, which contributes to enhancing response to subsequent infection by generating more monocytes or macrophages equipped with stronger anti-bacterial function. Here, we used the reinfection mice model to reveal that primary infection could improve neutrophil-mediated host defense by training neutrophil progenitors in mammals, providing a new idea to enhance neutrophil number and improve neutrophil functions, which is pretty pivotal for patients with compromised or disordered immunity.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Neutrophils , Animals , Neutrophils/immunology , Mice , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/immunology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Immunity, Innate , Humans , Reinfection/immunology , Disease Models, Animal
13.
J Infect ; 89(2): 106206, 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The risk of Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) under hybrid immunity remains unclear. METHODS: Using data from the German National Cohort (NAKO Gesundheitsstudie), we investigated risk factors for self-reported post-infection symptoms (any PCC is defined as having at least one symptom, and high symptom burden PCC as having nine or more symptoms). RESULTS: Sixty percent of 109,707 participants reported at least one previous SARS-CoV-2 infection; 35% reported having had any symptoms 4-12 months after infection; among them 23% reported nine or more symptoms. Individuals, who did not develop PCC after their first infection, had a strongly reduced risk for PCC after their second infection (50%) and a temporary risk reduction, which waned over 9 months after the preceding infection. The risk of developing PCC strongly depended on the virus variant. Within variants, there was no effect of the number of preceding vaccinations, apart from a strong protection by the fourth vaccination compared to three vaccinations for the Omicron variant (odds ratio = 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Previous infections without PCC and a fourth vaccination were associated with a lower risk of PCC after a new infection, indicating diminished risk under hybrid immunity. The two components of risk reduction after a preceding infection suggest different immunological mechanisms.

14.
Cell Rep ; 43(7): 114387, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896777

ABSTRACT

The ongoing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants poses challenges to the immunity induced by infections and vaccination. We conduct a 6-month longitudinal evaluation of antibody binding and neutralization of sera from individuals with six different combinations of vaccination and infection against BA.5, XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86. We find that most individuals produce spike-binding IgG or neutralizing antibodies against BA.5, XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 2 months after infection or vaccination. However, compared to ancestral strain and BA.5 variant, XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 exhibit comparable but significant immune evasion. The spike-binding IgG and neutralizing antibody titers decrease in individuals without additional antigen exposure, and <50% of individuals neutralize XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 during the 6-month follow-up. Approximately 57% of the 107 followed up individuals experienced an additional infection, leading to improved binding IgG and neutralizing antibody levels against these variants. These findings provide insights into the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on immunity following repeated exposure.

15.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1378426, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832230

ABSTRACT

Background: Tuberculosis remains a global health threat, and the World Health Organization reports a limited reduction in disease incidence rates, including both new and relapse cases. Therefore, studies targeting tuberculosis transmission chains and recurrent episodes are crucial for developing the most effective control measures. Herein, multiple tuberculosis clusters were retrospectively investigated by integrating patients' epidemiological and clinical information with median-joining networks recreated based on whole genome sequencing (WGS) data of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Methods: Epidemiologically linked tuberculosis patient clusters were identified during the source case investigation for pediatric tuberculosis patients. Only M. tuberculosis isolate DNA samples with previously determined spoligotypes identical within clusters were subjected to WGS and further median-joining network recreation. Relevant clinical and epidemiological data were obtained from patient medical records. Results: We investigated 18 clusters comprising 100 active tuberculosis patients 29 of whom were children at the time of diagnosis; nine patients experienced recurrent episodes. M. tuberculosis isolates of studied clusters belonged to Lineages 2 (sub-lineage 2.2.1) and 4 (sub-lineages 4.3.3, 4.1.2.1, 4.8, and 4.2.1), while sub-lineage 4.3.3 (LAM) was the most abundant. Isolates of six clusters were drug-resistant. Within clusters, the maximum genetic distance between closely related isolates was only 5-11 single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Recreated median-joining networks, integrated with patients' diagnoses, specimen collection dates, sputum smear microscopy, and epidemiological investigation results indicated transmission directions within clusters and long periods of latent infection. It also facilitated the identification of potential infection sources for pediatric patients and recurrent active tuberculosis episodes refuting the reactivation possibility despite the small genetic distance of ≤5 SNVs between isolates. However, unidentified active tuberculosis cases within the cluster, the variable mycobacterial mutation rate in dormant and active states, and low M. tuberculosis genetic variability inferred precise transmission chain delineation. In some cases, heterozygous SNVs with an allelic frequency of 10-73% proved valuable in identifying direct transmission events. Conclusion: The complex approach of integrating tuberculosis cluster WGS-data-based median-joining networks with relevant epidemiological and clinical data proved valuable in delineating epidemiologically linked patient transmission chains and deciphering causes of recurrent tuberculosis episodes within clusters.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Whole Genome Sequencing , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Male , Tuberculosis/transmission , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Female , Retrospective Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Cluster Analysis , Adult , Infant
16.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(21): e174, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend vaccination for individuals who have recovered from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to prevent reinfection, comprehensive evaluation studies are limited. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection according to the primary vaccination status, booster vaccination status, and vaccination methods used. METHODS: This population-based case-control study enrolled all SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in Seoul between January 2020 and February 2022. Individuals were categorized into case (reinfection) and control (no reinfection) groups. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression after adjusting for underlying comorbidities using multiple regression. RESULTS: The case group included 7,678 participants (average age: 32.26 years). In all vaccinated individuals, patients who received the first and second booster doses showed reduced reinfection rates compared with individuals who received basic vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 0.605, P < 0.001 and OR = 0.002, P < 0.001). Patients who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, NVX-CoV2373 and heterologous vaccination showed reduced reinfection rates compared with unvaccinated individuals (OR = 0.546, P < 0.001; OR = 0.356, P < 0.001; and OR = 0.472, P < 0.001). However, the ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination group showed a higher reinfection rate than the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination group (OR = 4.419, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, completion of the basic vaccination series showed significant protection against reinfection compared with no vaccination. If the first or second booster vaccination was received, the protective effect against reinfection was higher than that of basic vaccination; when vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 only or heterologous vaccination, the protective effect was higher than that of ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination only.


Subject(s)
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccine Efficacy , Humans , Male , Female , Case-Control Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Reinfection/prevention & control , Reinfection/immunology , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Young Adult , Vaccination , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Aged
17.
Front Microbiol ; 15: 1406581, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881657

ABSTRACT

Objective: Previous research has shown that human identical sequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) promote coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression by upregulating hyaluronic acid (HA). However, the association of HA with mortality and long COVID in SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and first infection is unclear. Methods: Patients with COVID-19 at Beijing Ditan Hospital from September 2023 to November 2023 were consecutively enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections were matched 1:2 with first infections using a nearest neighbor propensity score matching algorithm. We compared the hospital outcomes between patients with COVID-19 reinfection and first infection. The association between HA levels and mortality and long COVID in the matched cohort was analyzed. Results: The reinfection rate among COVID-19 hospitalized patients was 25.4% (62 cases). After propensity score matching, we found that reinfection was associated with a better clinical course and prognosis, including lower levels of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fewer cases of bilateral lung infiltration and respiratory failure, and shorter viral clearance time and duration of symptoms (p < 0.05). HA levels were significantly higher in patients with primary infection [128.0 (90.5, 185.0) vs. 94.5 (62.0, 167.3), p = 0.008], those with prolonged viral clearance time [90.5 (61.5, 130.8) vs. 130.0 (95.0, 188.0), p < 0.001], and deceased patients [105.5 (76.8, 164.5) vs. 188.0 (118.0, 208.0), p = 0.002]. Further analysis showed that HA was an independent predictor of death (AUC: 0.789), and the risk of death increased by 4.435 times (OR = 5.435, 95% CI = 1.205-24.510, p = 0.028) in patients with high HA levels. We found that patients with HA levels above 116 ng/mL had an increased risk of death. However, the incidence of long COVID was similar in the different HA level groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Serum HA may serve as a novel biomarker for predicting COVID-19 mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and first infection. However, HA levels may not be associated with long COVID.

18.
Front Microbiol ; 15: 1386891, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881666

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 begins in the upper respiratory tract and can trigger the production of mucosal spike-specific secretory IgA (sIgA), which provides protection against reinfection. It has been recognized that individuals with high level of nasal spike-specific IgA have a lower risk of reinfection. However, mucosal spike-specific sIgA wanes over time, and different individuals may have various level of spike-specific sIgA and descending kinetics, leading to individual differences in susceptibility to reinfection. A method for detecting spike-specific sIgA in the nasal passage would be valuable for predicting the risk of reinfection so that people at risk can have better preparedness. Methods: In this study, we describe the development of a colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic (ICT) strip for detecting SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike-specific sIgA in nasal mucosal lining fluids (NMLFs). Results: The ICT strip was designed to detect 0.125 µg or more spike-specific sIgA in 80 µL of NMLFs collected using a nasal swab. Purified nasal sIgA samples from individuals who recently recovered from an Omicron BA.5 infection were used to demonstrate that this ICT strip can specifically detect spike-specific sIgA. The signal levels positively correlated with neutralizing activities against XBB. Subsequent analysis revealed that people with low or undetectable levels of spike-specific sIgA in the nasal passage were more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Conclusions: This nasal spike-specific sIgA ICT strip provides a non-invasive, rapid, and convenient method to assess the risk of reinfection for achieving precision preparedness.

19.
Int J Cancer ; 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837354

ABSTRACT

A significant Omicron wave emerged in China in December 2022. To explore the duration of humoral and cellular response postinfection and the efficacy of hybrid immunity in preventing Omicron reinfection in patients with lung cancer, a total of 447 patients were included in the longitudinal study after the Omicron wave from March 2023 to August 2023. Humoral responses were measured at pre-Omicron wave, 3 months and 7 months postinfection. The detected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) specific antibodies including total antibodies, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) specific IgG, and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 wild type (WT) and BA.4/5 variant. T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 WT and Omicron variant were evaluated in 101 patients by ELISpot at 3 months postinfection. The results showed that Omicron-infected symptoms were mild, while fatigue (30.2%), shortness of breath (34.0%) and persistent cough (23.6%) were long-lasting, and vaccines showed efficacy against fever in lung cancer patients. Humoral responses were higher in full or booster vaccinated patients than those unvaccinated (p < .05 for all four antibodies), and the enhanced response persisted for at least 7 months. T cell response to Omicron was higher than WT peptides (21.3 vs. 16.0 SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = .0093). Moreover, 38 (9.74%) patients were reinfected, which had lower antibody responses than non-reinfected patients (all p < .05), and those patients of unvaccinated at late stage receiving anti-cancer immunotherapy alone were at high risk of reinfection. Collectively, these data demonstrate the Omicron infection induces a high and durable immune response in vaccinated patients with lung cancer, which protects vaccinated patients from reinfection.

20.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1364048, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873290

ABSTRACT

Background: It is important to figure out the immunity of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection to understand the response of humans to viruses. A serological survey for previously infected populations in Jiangsu Province was conducted to compare the antibody level of SARS-CoV-2 in reinfection by Omicron or not. Methods: Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 was defined as an individual being infected again after 90 days of the initial infection. Telephone surveys and face-to-face interviews were implemented to collect information. Experimental and control serum samples were collected from age-sex-matched reinfected and non-reinfected cases, respectively. IgG anti-S and neutralizing antibodies (Nab) concentrations were detected by the Magnetism Particulate Immunochemistry Luminescence Method (MCLIA). Antibody titers were log(2)-transformed and analyzed by a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between the strain type of primary infection, SARS-Cov-2 vaccination status, and antibody levels. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify associations between reinfection with IgG and Nab levels. Results: Six hundred thirty-one individuals were enrolled in this study, including 327 reinfected cases and 304 non-reinfected cases. The reinfection group had higher IgG (5.65 AU/mL vs. 5.22 AU/mL) and Nab (8.02 AU/mL vs. 7.25 AU/mL) levels compared to the non-reinfection group (p < 0.001). Particularly, individuals who had received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or were initially infected with the Wild type and Delta variant showed a significant increase in antibody levels after reinfection. After adjusting demographic variables, vaccination status and the type of primary infection together, IgG and Nab levels in the reinfected group increased by log(2)-transformed 0.71 and 0.64 units, respectively (p < 0.001). This revealed that reinfection is an important factor that affects IgG and Nab levels in the population. Conclusion: Reinfection with Omicron in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 enhances IgG and Nab immune responses.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Reinfection/immunology , Reinfection/virology , China , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Male , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...