Concordance between two models of stratification for patients living with HIV infection to providing pharmaceutical care. / [Artículo traducido] Concordancia entre 2 modelos de estratificación de pacientes que viven con el VIH para la prestación de atención farmacéutica.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement of two differents stratification models for pharmaceutical care to people living with HIV. METHODS: This was a single-centre observational prospective cohort study of patients with regular follow-up in pharmaceutical care consultations according to the Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity methodology, conducted between January 1st and March 31th, 2023. Patients received the pharmacotherapeutic interventions applied routinely to ambulatory care patients according to this model. As part of the usual clinical practice, the presence or absence of the variables that apply to both stratification models were collected. The scores obtained and the corresponding stratification level were collected for each patient according to both stratification models published (ST-2017 and ST-2022). To analyze the reliability between the measurements of two numerical score models of the stratification level with both tools, their degree of concordance was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Likewise, reliability was also evaluated from a qualitative perspective by means of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Additionally, the existence of correlation between the scores of the two models was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the total of 758 patients being followed in the cohort, finally, 233 patients were enrolled. The distribution of patients for each stratification model was: ST-2017: 59.7% level-3, 25.3% level-2 and 15.0% level-1, while for ST-2022: 60.9% level-3, 26.6% level-2 and 12.4% level-1. It was observed that the reclassification was symmetrical (p=0.317). The qualitative analysis of the agreement between the models showed a good Cohen's kappa value, (K=0.66). A value of 0.563 was found as the intraclass correlation coefficient. Finally, the correlation analysis between the quantitative scores of the two models yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the two models was good, which confirms that the multidimensional adaptation and simplification of the model were correct and that its use can be extended in routine clinical practice.

Acuerdo de riesgo compartido basado en resultados de salud para el tratamiento de psoriasis moderada-grave con certolizumab pegol / Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol

Objetivo: aportar evidencia de la efectividad de certolizumab pegol (CZP) en la práctica clínica real en pacientes adultos afectados por psoriasis (PsO) en placas moderada-grave, dentro del contexto de un acuerdo de riesgo compartido (ARC). Métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo a partir de las variables recogidas en un ARC en los pacientes adultos con PsO en placas moderada-grave tratados con CZP. Participaron 10 hospitales españoles donde se estableció el ARC. Se evaluó el porcentaje de pacientes que alcanzaron la respuesta clínica objetivo del ARC en la visita de seguimiento (semana 16): valor de Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) absoluto ≤3 para la población naive a biológicos, y ≤5 ante el fracaso previo a un único fármaco biológico. Además, se analizó la mejora en la puntuación de otras escalas: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician’s Global Assesment (PGA) y Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo del total de la población y por subgrupos de pacientes (naive vs. no naive a biológico, hombre vs. mujer, y con vs. sin interrupción). Resultados: se incluyeron 66 pacientes, 12 hombres y 54 mujeres. El 90,9% alcanzaron la respuesta clínica objetivo, con una reducción media de 8 (−78,4%) puntos de PASI absoluto. Se observó una mejora en BSA, PGA, NAPSI y DLQI, con una reducción de 11,3 (−80,6%), 1,9 (−65,5%), 3,3 (−30,7%) y 9,0 (−66,4%) puntos del valor absoluto, respectivamente. Pese a no alcanzar el objetivo terapéutico establecido en el ARC en 6 pacientes (9%) (el coste del fármaco fue asumido por el laboratorio), solo 2 (3%) interrumpieron el tratamiento. Conclusión: nuestro estudio muestra que CZP resulta efectivo en la práctica clínica real en los pacientes con PsO en placas moderada-grave con una mejora de PASI absoluto y DLQI, así como de otras escalas, tanto para el total de la población como en los subgrupos analizados...(AU)

Objective: To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA). Methods: Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analyzed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation). Results: Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (−78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (−80.6%), 1.9 (−65.5%), 3.3 (−30.7%) and 9.0 (−66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in six patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only two (3%) discontinued treatment. Conclusion: Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analyzed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA...(AU)

Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate–severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol / Acuerdo de riesgo compartido basado en resultados de salud para el tratamiento de psoriasis moderada-grave con certolizumab pegol

Objetivo: aportar evidencia de la efectividad de certolizumab pegol (CZP) en la práctica clínica real en pacientes adultos afectados por psoriasis (PsO) en placas moderada-grave, dentro del contexto de un acuerdo de riesgo compartido (ARC). Métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo a partir de las variables recogidas en un ARC en los pacientes adultos con PsO en placas moderada-grave tratados con CZP. Participaron 10 hospitales españoles donde se estableció el ARC. Se evaluó el porcentaje de pacientes que alcanzaron la respuesta clínica objetivo del ARC en la visita de seguimiento (semana 16): valor de Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) absoluto ≤3 para la población naive a biológicos, y ≤5 ante el fracaso previo a un único fármaco biológico. Además, se analizó la mejora en la puntuación de otras escalas: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician’s Global Assesment (PGA) y Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo del total de la población y por subgrupos de pacientes (naive vs. no naive a biológico, hombre vs. mujer, y con vs. sin interrupción). Resultados: se incluyeron 66 pacientes, 12 hombres y 54 mujeres. El 90,9% alcanzaron la respuesta clínica objetivo, con una reducción media de 8 (−78,4%) puntos de PASI absoluto. Se observó una mejora en BSA, PGA, NAPSI y DLQI, con una reducción de 11,3 (−80,6%), 1,9 (−65,5%), 3,3 (−30,7%) y 9,0 (−66,4%) puntos del valor absoluto, respectivamente. Pese a no alcanzar el objetivo terapéutico establecido en el ARC en 6 pacientes (9%) (el coste del fármaco fue asumido por el laboratorio), solo 2 (3%) interrumpieron el tratamiento. Conclusión: nuestro estudio muestra que CZP resulta efectivo en la práctica clínica real en los pacientes con PsO en placas moderada-grave con una mejora de PASI absoluto y DLQI, así como de otras escalas, tanto para el total de la población como en los subgrupos analizados...(AU)

Objective: To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA). Methods: Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analyzed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation). Results: Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (−78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (−80.6%), 1.9 (−65.5%), 3.3 (−30.7%) and 9.0 (−66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in six patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only two (3%) discontinued treatment. Conclusion: Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analyzed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA...(AU)

El registro continuado de los efectos adversos mejora los resultados quirúrgicos / Continuous monitoring of adverse effects improves surgical outcomes

Antecedentes: Se ha debatido mucho sobre las ventajas e inconvenientes del uso de bases administrativas o de registros clínicos en los programas de mejora de la atención médica. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido revisar la implementación y los resultados de una política de evaluación continua, mediante un registro mantenido por profesionales de un Servicio de Cirugía. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron, de forma prospectiva, todos los pacientes ingresados en el servicio entre los años 2003 y 2022. Se anotaron todos los efectos adversos (EA) acaecidos durante el ingreso, la estancia en centros de convalecencia o en su domicilio durante un periodo mínimo de 30 días tras el alta. Resultados: De 60.125 registros, en 16.802 (27,9%) se registraron 24.846 EA. Hubo un aumento progresivo del número de EA registrados por ingreso (1,17 en 2003 vs. 1,93 en 2022) con una disminución de 26% de los registros con EA (35% en 2003 hasta 25,8% en 2022), de 57,5% en las reoperaciones (de 8 a 3,4%, respectivamente), y de 80% en la mortalidad (de 1,8 a 1%, respectivamente). Es de remarcar la reducción significativa de los EA graves, observada entre los años 2011 y el 2022 (56 vs. 15,6%). Conclusión: Un registro prospectivo de EA creado y mantenido por profesionales del servicio, junto con la presentación y discusión abierta y trasparente de los resultados, produce una mejora sostenida de los resultados en un servicio quirúrgico de un hospital universitario.(AU)

Background: There has been significant debate about the advantages and disadvantages of using administrative databases or clinical registries in healthcare improvement programs. The aim of this study was to review the implementation and outcomes of an accountability policy through a registry maintained by professionals of the surgical department.Materials and methods: All patients admitted to the department between 2003 and 2022 were prospectively included. All adverse events (AEs) occurring during the admission, convalescent care in facilities, or at home for a minimum period of 30 days after discharge were recorded. Results: Out of 60,125 records, 24,846 AEs were documented in 16,802 cases (27.9%). There was a progressive increase in the number of AEs recorded per admission (1.17 in 2003 vs. 1.93 in 2022) with a 26% decrease in entries with AEs (from 35% in 2003 to 25.8% in 2022), a 57.5% decrease in reoperations (from 8.0% to 3.4%, respectively), and an 80% decrease in mortality (from 1.8% to 1%, respectively). It is noteworthy that a significant reduction in severe AEs was observed between 2011 and 2022 (56% vs. 15.6%). Conclusion: A prospective registry of AEs created and maintained by health professionals, along with transparent presentation and discussion of the results, leads to sustained improvement in outcomes in a surgical department of a university hospital.(AU)

Concordance between two models of stratification for patients living with HIV infection to providing pharmaceutical care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement of 2 differents stratification models for pharmaceutical care to people living with HIV. METHODS: This was a single-center observational prospective cohort study of patients with regular follow-up in pharmaceutical care consultations according to the Capacity-Motivation-Opportunity methodology, conducted between January 1 and March 31, 2023. Patients received the pharmacotherapeutic interventions applied routinely to ambulatory care patients according to this model. As part of the usual clinical practice, the presence or absence of the variables that apply to both stratification models were collected. The scores obtained and the corresponding stratification level were collected for each patient according to both stratification models published (ST-2017 and ST-2022). To analyze the reliability between the measurements of 2 numerical score models of the stratification level with both tools, their degree of concordance was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Likewise, reliability was also evaluated from a qualitative perspective by means of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Additionally, the existence of correlation between the scores of the 2 models was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the total of 758 patients being followed in the cohort, finally, 233 patients were enrolled. The distribution of patients for each stratification model was: ST-2017: 59.7% level-3, 25.3% level-2, and 15.0% level-1, while for ST-2022: 60.9% level-3, 26.6% level-2, and 12.4% level-1. It was observed that the reclassification was symmetrical (P=.317). The qualitative analysis of the agreement between the models showed a good Cohen's kappa value, (K=0.66). A value of 0.563 was found as the intraclass correlation coefficient. Finally, the correlation analysis between the quantitative scores of the 2 models yielded a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the 2 models was good, which confirms that the multidimensional adaptation and simplification of the model were correct and that its use can be extended in routine clinical practice.

Continuous monitoring of adverse effects improves surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There has been significant debate about the advantages and disadvantages of using administrative databases or clinical registry in healthcare improvement programs. The aim of this study was to review the implementation and outcomes of an accountability policy through a registry maintained by professionals of the surgical department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted to the department between 2003 and 2022 were prospectively included. All adverse events (AEs) occurring during the admission, convalescent care in facilities, or at home for a minimum period of 30 days after discharge were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 60,125 records, 24,846 AEs were documented in 16,802 cases (27.9%). There was a progressive increase in the number of AEs recorded per admission (1.17 in 2003 vs. 1.93 in 2022) with a 26% decrease in entries with AEs (from 35.0% in 2003 to 25.8% in 2022), a 57.5% decrease in reoperations (from 8.0% to 3.4%, respectively), and an 80% decrease in mortality (from 1.8% to 1.0%, respectively). It is noteworthy that a significant reduction in severe AEs was observed between 2011 and 2022 (56% vs. 15.6%). CONCLUSION: A prospective registry of AEs created and maintained by health professionals, along with transparent presentation and discussion of the results, leads to sustained improvement in outcomes in a surgical department of a university hospital.

Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol. / Acuerdo de riesgo compartido basado en resultados de salud para el tratamiento de psoriasis moderada-grave con certolizumab pegol.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analyzed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (-78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (-80.6%), 1.9 (-65.5%), 3.3 (-30.7%) and 9.0 (-66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in six patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only two (3%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analyzed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA. Implementing this type of agreement can provide a direct or indirect benefit for all the agents involved in the process, providing valuable information for decision-making.

[Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into pharmacy and dermatology departments, in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients, as a tool to improve the healthcare quality and health outcomes]. / Incorporación de resultados informados por pacientes con psoriasis y dermatitis atópica en las consultas de atención farmacéutica y dermatología: herramienta que mejora la calidad asistencial y resultados en salud.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information about their disease, treatment, and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new system of work coordinated between pharmacists and dermatologists, based on the collection and analysis of PROs to assess its clinical impact as well as patients satisfaction. METHOD: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted under clinical conditions and included adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis (PS) and atopic dermatitis (AD) between April-2021 and February-2022. Pharmacists and dermatologists agreed on this systematic work. A REDCap® database was designed to facilitate data collection and the subsequent analysis. RESULTS: A total of 288 and 41 patients with PS and AD, respectively, were included. Those who started treatment showed significant improvement with a decrease in PROs and clinical parameters (p < 0.001). The pharmacist made 168 and 7 recommendations to dermatologists for PS and AD patients, respectively, of which 66.07% and 57.1% were accepted. The most common recommendations were «consult with rheumatologist¼ (20.83%), «extend drug regimen¼ (19.64%) and «consider change in treatment¼ (11.90%). Adverse events were reported in 55 and 17 patients with PS and AD, respectively. Of 103 patients, 75% were «very satisfied¼ and 20% «satisfied¼ with the system. CONCLUSIONS: This new working system helps to evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of treatments and also to identify adverse events, alarm symptoms and co-morbidities in order to optimize therapies. Collaboration between pharmacists and dermatologists reduces decision-making time and patients appreciate better clinical care leading to higher patient satisfaction.

[Translated article] Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analysed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (-78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI, and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (-80.6%), 1.9 (-65.5%), 3.3 (-30.7%), and 9.0 (-66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in 6 patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only 2 (3%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analysed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA. Implementing this type of agreement can provide a direct or indirect benefit for all the agents involved in the process, providing valuable information for decision-making.

Atención farmacéutica y asma: protocolo de una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas / Pharmaceutical care and asthma: Protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Introducción las revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis recientes sugieren que las intervenciones por parte de farmacéuticos en pacientes asmáticos tienen un impacto positivo en resultados en salud. Sin embargo, la asociación no está bien establecida y el papel de los farmacéuticos clínicos está pobremente representado, así como el de los pacientes con asma grave. El objetivo de esta revisión de revisiones es identificar revisiones sistemáticas publicadas que evalúen el impacto de las intervenciones farmacéuticas en resultados en salud medidos en pacientes asmáticos, así como describir los componentes clave de las intervenciones, los resultados medidos y cualquier asociación entre las intervenciones farmacéuticas y los resultados en salud medidos. Métodos se hará una busqueda en PubMed, Embase, Scopus y la Cochrane Library desde el primer registro hasta diciembre de 2022. Se considerará la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas de todo tipo de estudios primarios, severidad del asma o nivel asistencial que midan resultados en salud. La calidad metodológica se medirá usando A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Dos investigadores independientes realizarán la selección de los estudios, la evaluación de la calidad y la extracción de datos. Cualquier discrepancia será solventada por un tercer investigador. Ambos resultados, narrativos y metaanálisis, de los estudios primarios incluidos en las revisiones sistemáticas serán sintetizados. Si los datos son apropiados para un análisis cuantitativo, las medidas de asociación se expresarán como cociente de riesgos y diferencia de medias. Discusión los primeros resultados del establecimiento de una red multidisciplinar para el manejo de los pacientes asmáticos mostraron beneficios en integrar los diferentes niveles asistenciales en el control de la enfermedad y la reducción de la morbilidad...(AU)

Introduction Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented, as well as severe asthma patients. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients, as well as to describe key components of the interventions, the outcomes assessed and any associations between pharmacists' interventions and health-related outcomes. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs, severity of asthma and level of care that measured health-related outcomes will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection, any discrepancy will be solved by a third investigator. Both narrative findings and meta-analysis of primary study data included in the systematic reviews will be synthesized. If data are appropriate for quantitative synthesis, the measures of association will be expressed as the risk ratio and difference in means. Discussion The first results on the establishment of a multidisciplinary network for the management of asthmatic patients have shown the benefits of integrating different levels of care in disease control and morbidity reduction. Further studies showed benefits in hospital admissions, patients' basal oral corticosteroid dose, exacerbations and quality of life of asthma patients...(AU)

Pharmaceutical care and asthma: Protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews. / [Artículo traducido] Atención farmacéutica y asma: protocolo de una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas.

INTRODUCTION: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented, as well as severe asthma patients. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients, as well as to describe key components of the interventions, the outcomes assessed and any associations between pharmacists' interventions and health-related outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs, severity of asthma and level of care that measured health-related outcomes will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection, any discrepancy will be solved by a third investigator. Both narrative findings and meta-analysis of primary study data included in the systematic reviews will be synthesized. If data are appropriate for quantitative synthesis, the measures of association will be expressed as the risk ratio and difference in means. DISCUSSION: The first results on the establishment of a multidisciplinary network for the management of asthmatic patients have shown the benefits of integrating different levels of care in disease control and morbidity reduction. Further studies showed benefits in hospital admissions, patients' basal oral corticosteroid dose, exacerbations and quality of life of asthma patients. A systematic review is the most appropriate design in order to summarize the literature and identify the evidence of the benefits of interventions performed by clinical pharmacists in asthma patients, especially those with severe uncontrolled asthma, and encourage future studies to stablish the role of clinical pharmacists in asthma units. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Systematic review registration number: CRD42022372100.

Pharmaceutical care and asthma: Protocol of an umbrella review of systematic reviews.

INTRODUCTION: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented, as well as severe asthma patients. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients, as well as to describe key components of the interventions, the outcomes assessed and any associations between pharmacists' interventions and health-related outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs, severity of asthma and level of care that measured health-related outcomes will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection, any discrepancy will be solved by a third investigator. Both narrative findings and meta-analysis of primary study data included in the systematic reviews will be synthesised. If data are appropriate for quantitative synthesis, the measures of association will be expressed as the risk ratio and difference in means. DISCUSSION: The first results on the establishment of a multidisciplinary network for the management of asthmatic patients have shown the benefits of integrating different levels of care in disease control and morbidity reduction. Further studies showed benefits in hospital admissions, patients' basal oral corticosteroid dose, exacerbations and quality of life of asthma patients. A systematic review is the most appropriate design in order to summarise the literature and identify the evidence of the benefits of interventions performed by clinical pharmacists in asthma patients, especially those with severe uncontrolled asthma, and encourage future studies to stablish the role of clinical pharmacists in asthma units. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Systematic review registration number: CRD42022372100.

Changes in Mental Health of Children and Young People in Residential Care: Outcomes and Associated Factors / Los cambios en la salud mental de los niños y jóvenes en acogimiento residencial: resultados y factores asociados

Several studies have evidenced that children in out-of-home care (OOHC), including foster family care and residential care, reveal high levels of mental health disorders (ranging from 40% to 88%). This study examines the outcomes in mental health reported by key residential workers in a group of children and youth (N = 492) between 8-17 years old who were in residential child care (RCC) in Spain. The research also aims to explore the relationship between mental health outcomes and the provision of mental health services (i.e., receiving any mental health treatment) as well as the influence of child, family, and placement factors. The design of this study includes two measures: a baseline (T1) and a follow-up two years later (T2). The results indicated that 29.9% of young people enjoyed sustained mental health; 26% meaningful improvement in their mental health; 23.5% meaningful deterioration; and the remaining 20.5% showed no meaningful change. One of the main findings was that receiving mental health treatment had a significant impact on mental health outcomes. It is crucial to establish protocols and systematic detection tools to assess mental health and ensure detection and referral to proper treatment. (AU)

La investigación en el ámbito de la protección a la infancia ha destacado la presencia de un alto porcentaje de niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA) en acogimiento residencial y familiar con trastornos de salud mental (entre el 40% y el 88%). Este estudio tiene como objetivo examinar los cambios experimentados en la salud mental de los NNA durante el proceso de acogida según informan sus educadores de referencia en un grupo de 492 NNA entre 8-17 años que se encontraban en hogares de protección en España. El estudio también tiene como objetivo explorar la relación entre los resultados en salud mental y el tratamiento recibido desde diferentes servicios de salud mental, además de la influencia que puedan ejercer factores del NNA, su familia o el proceso de protección. El diseño del estudio se basa en dos medidas: línea base (T1) y seguimiento dos años después (T2). Los resultados indican que el 29.9% de los NNA mantenía una buena salud mental en las dos medidas, 26% manifestaron una mejora significativa partiendo de niveles clínicos, 23.5% manifestaron un deterioro significativo y el 20.5% no mostraron cambios significativos, manteniendo niveles clínicos en ambas medidas. Una de las principales conclusiones fue que estar recibiendo o no tratamiento en salud mental resultó ser un factor clave en la evolución de los NNA. Por tanto, resulta crucial establecer sistemas de detección de problemas de salud mental en esta población con el fin de derivar precozmente a tratamientos adecuados. (AU)

Patient-reported outcomes y aplicaciones móviles. Revisión de su impacto en los resultados en saludde los pacientes / Patient-reported outcomes and mobile applications. A review of their impact on patients’ health outcomes

Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sobre la evidencia de las aplicacionesmóviles en el registro de los patient-reported outcomes y su impacto enlos resultados en salud.Método: Revisión de la literatura sobre los estudios de aplicacionesorientadas al registro de patient-reported outcomes y que analizaransu impacto en los resultados en salud de los pacientes. La búsquedase realizó en abril de 2021 en Pubmed y Embase con los términos“App”, “Mobile Applications”; “Patient Reported Outcomes”; “OutcomeAssessment, Health Care”; “Quality of Life”. Se incluyeron artículos publicadosen inglés o español sin límite de tiempo y que incluyeran aplicacionescuyos participantes fueran pacientes, familiares y/o cuidadores y quemidieran algún tipo de resultado en salud.Resultados: De los 26 artículos revisados, 19 (73,1%) fueron ensayosclínicos, 4 (15,4%) estudios cuasiexperimentales y 3 (11,5%) estudios observacionales.En 4 estudios (15,4%) estaba implicado un servicio de farmaciay en 3 (11,5%) el estudio fue realizado en España. El tamaño muestral varióde 14 a 411. En función de la población de estudio, los más frecuentesincluyeron pacientes oncológicos (11 [42,3%] estudios) y pacientes conpatologías cardiovasculares (7 [26,9%] estudios). La mayoría de los estudiosse centraron en la medición del impacto de las aplicaciones en términos Adhedecalidad de vida (50,0%), control de parámetros clínicos (46,2%), adherencia(38,5%) y manejo de los síntomas y/o reducción de complicaciones(26,9%). La eficacia global en términos del porcentaje en los que se observóuna mejoría significativa con el uso de las aplicaciones fue del 73,1%. Lospatient-reported outcomes en los que se observó un mayor impacto fueron laadherencia, la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la satisfacción.

Objective: To review the evidence of the mobile apps in collectionpatient-reported outcomes and their impact on health outcomes.Method: A review was conducted of the literature on apps aimedat collecting patient-reported outcomes. Selected articles were requiredto consider the apps’ impact on patients’ health outcomes. The searchwas carried out during April 2021 in Pubmed and Embase using thesearch terms “app”, “mobile applications” , “patient-reported outcomes”,“outcome assessment, health care”, and “quality of life”, To be includedarticles had to be written in English or Spanish and they were requiredto dwell on apps used by patients, family members and/or caregiversthat measured at least one health outcome. No time restrictions wereapplied.Results: Of the 26 articles reviewed, 19 (73.1%) were clinical trials,4 (15.4%) were quasi-experimental studies, and 3 (11.5%) were observationalstudies. A pharmacy department was involved in 4 studies (15.4%),and 3 (11.5%), were carried out in Spain. The sample size ranged from14 to 411. Depending on the study population, the most frequent studiesincluded cancer patients (42.3%) and patients with cardiovascular diseases(26.9%). Most of the studies focused on measuring the impact of theapp on the patients’ quality of life (50.0%), control of clinical parameters (46.2%), adherence (38.5%), and management of symptoms and/orreduction of complications (26.9%). Overall efficacy in terms of the percentageof studies where apps were found to result in a significant improvementwas 73.1%. The most heavily impacted patient-reported outcomeswere adherence, health-related quality of life and satisfaction.

Efectividad, seguridad, calidad de vida y satisfacción de pacientes con psoriasis palmo-plantar tratados con espuma de calcipotriol y betametasona / Effectiveness, safety, quality of life and satisfaction of patients with palmo-plantar psoriasis treated with calcipotriol and betametasone foam

Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad, la seguridad, la calidad de vida y la satisfacción de pacientes con psoriasis palmo-plantar (PP) no pustulosa tratados con espuma de calcipotriol y betametasona dipropionato (Cal/BD).Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de psoriasis no controlada con afectación PP para los que estuviera indicado iniciar tratamiento tópico con Cal/BD. Las variables recogidas fueron: demográficas (sexo y edad), antropométricas (índice de masa corporal (IMC)), relacionadas con la patología (Body Surface Area (BSA) categorizado como <10% o bien ≥10%) y relacionadas con el tratamiento (tratamientos farmacológicos previos).Para evaluar la efectividad y la seguridad del tratamiento se empleó el Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPASI) y el Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), y se recogió la incidencia y gravedad de los efectos adversos. Para valorar la calidad de vida se utilizó el Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), así como el Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) para valorar la satisfacción del paciente con el tratamiento a las 4 semanas. Las variables de efectividad y de calidad de vida se evaluaron al inicio y a las 4 semanas de tratamiento, calculándose la diferencia en términos absolutos entre ambas.Resultados: Se incluyeron 19 pacientes (11 mujeres) con una edad de 59 (RIQ 11,4) años y un IMC de 25,9 (RIQ 6,0) kg/m2, todos ellos con un BSA <10%, previamente pretratados con tratamientos tópicos (74%; 14/19), acitretino (48%; 9/19) e inmunosupresores (26%; 5/19), entre otros. (AU)

Objective: To evaluate effectiveness, safety, quality of life and satisfaction of patients with non-pustular palmo-plantar (PP) psoriasis treated with calcipotriol and betamethasone (Cal/BD) foam.Material and methods: Observational, prospective study. We included adult patients with a diagnosis of uncontrolled PP psoriasis in which topical treatment was indicated. Demographic (sex and age), anthropometric (body mass index (BMI)), related to the pathology (Body Surface Area (BSA) categorized as <10% or ≥10%) and related to the treatment (previous pharmacological treatments) variables were studied. To evaluate effectiveness and safety of the treatment, Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPASI) and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) were used, and the incidence and severity of the adverse effects were collected. To assess quality of life, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was used, as well as Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment at the 4th week. The variables of effectiveness and quality of life were evaluated at the beginning and at 4th week of treatment, calculating the difference in absolute terms between them.Results: We included 19 patients (11 women) with a median of 59 (IQR 11.4) years old and a BMI of 25.9 (IQR 6.0) kg/m2. All the patients showed a BSA <10% and were previously treated with topical treatments (74%; 14/19), acitretin (48%; 9/19) and immunosuppressants (26%; 5/19), among others. (AU)

Pilot study of an Empowerment Program to improve adherence and quality of life of patients with respiratory disease under treatment with portable oxygen therapy / Estudio piloto de un programa de empoderamiento para mejorar la adherencia y la calidad de vida de pacientes con patología respiratoria en tratamiento con oxigenoterapia portátil

Objetivo. Persiste un problema de adherencia en pacientes sometidos a tratamiento con concentrador de oxígeno portátil (POC). El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer los beneficios de un programa de empoderamiento específico en la adherencia y la calidad de vida. Material y métodos. Estudio realizado en el Hospital Universitario Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa (Cataluña). Participaron 22 pacientes adultos (edad media= 68,7; DE= 5,53; un 59% eran hombres y un 86% tenían diagnóstico de EPOC). El programa se enfoca en empoderar al paciente a través del conocimiento de su respiración y mejorar las actividades de la vida diaria. Se realiza una evaluación integral (adherencia diaria y semanal, disnea, percepción de la oxigenoterapia, calidad de vida), un taller educativo y formativo (que incluye ejercicios respiratorios y manejo de la EPOC en la vida diaria) y un seguimiento (que incluye un dispositivo para monitorear adherencia). Resultados. En la visita de 3 meses, los pacientes tuvieron una mejor adherencia diaria estadísticamente significativa (t[21]= -4,83; p= 0,001) con un gran tamaño del efecto (d= -1,03). La adherencia semanal también mejoró (t[21]= -2,90; p< 0,001) con un tamaño del efecto moderado (d= -,61). El empoderamiento fue estadísticamente significativo (t[21]= -4,87; p= 0,007) con un gran tamaño del efecto (d= -1,03). Se encontró una correlación significativa entre la mejora en el empoderamiento y la adherencia diaria (F(3)= 7,750; p= 0,031) con un gran tamaño del efecto (2= 0,383); también con percepción de oxigenoterapia (r= 0,739; p< 0,001). Se encontró una mejora estadísticamente significativa en la calidad de vida (t[21]= - 7,137; p< 0,001) y en el bienestar emocional (t[21]= - 2,86; p= 0,011) y actividades (p= 0,048) con un tamaño de efecto moderado (r= -0,42). En cuanto a las variables sociodemográficas, no se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a ninguna de las características y adherencia (AU)

1Air Liquide Healthcare Spain. Pneumology. Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. Madrid, Spain. 2Faculty of Psychology. University of València . València, Spain. 3Pneumology. Hospital Universitario Sant Joan de Déu Manresa. Catalonia, Spain. Abstract Aim. There is still a problem of adherence in patients undergoing treatment with portable oxygen concentrator (POC). The aim of this study was to know the benefits of a specific empowerment program in adherence and quality of life. Material and methods. Study conducted at the Sant Joan de Déu University Hospital in Manresa (Catalonia). 22 adults patients participated (mean age= 68.7; SD= 5.53; 59% were men, and 86% had a diagnosis of COPD). The program focuses on empowering the patient through knowledge of their breathing and enhancing activities of daily life. A comprehensive evaluation (daily and weekly adherence, dyspnoea, perception of oxygen therapy, quality of life), an educational and training workshop (including respiratory exercises and managing POC in daily life), and a follow-up (which includes a device to monitor adherence) are performed. Results. At the 3-month visit, the patients had a statistically significant better daily adherence (t[21]= -4.83; p= 0.001) with a large effect size (d= -1.03). Weekly adherence also improved (t[21]= - 2.90; p< 0.001) with a moderate effect size (d= -0.61). Empowerment was statistically significant (t[21]= -4.87; p= 0.007) with a large effect size (d= -1.03). A significant correlation was found between improvement in empowerment and daily adherence (F[3]= 7.750; p= 0.031) with a large effect size (2= 0.383); also with perception of oxygen therapy (r= 0.739; p< 0.001). A statistically significant improvement in quality of life was found (t[21]= -7.137; p< 0.001) and in emotional well-being (t[21]= -2.86; p= 0.011) and activities (p= 0.048) with a moderate effect size (r= -0.42) (AU)

Improving mental health and wellbeing in elderly people isolated at home due to architectural barriers: A community health intervention / Mejorando la salud mental y el bienestar de las personas mayores aisladas en casa debido a las barreras arquitectónicas: una intervención de salud comunitaria

Objetivos: Explorar los efectos sobre la salud de una intervención de salud comunitaria en personas mayores aisladas en casa debido a problemas de movilidad o a barreras arquitectónicas, identificar las características asociadas y evaluar la satisfacción de las personas participantes. Diseño: Estudio cuasi-experimental antes-después. Emplazamiento: Cinco barrios de baja renta de Barcelona durante 2010-15. Participantes: Se entrevistó a 147 participantes, ≥59 años, antes y 6 meses después de la intervención. Intervención: Equipos de atención primaria, trabajadores sociales, de salud pública y otros agentes comunitarios desarrollaron una intervención que consistía en salidas semanales, facilitadas por voluntarios. Mediciones: Se evalúo la salud autopercibida, la salud mental utilizando la escala GHQ-12 y la calidad de vida mediante la escala EuroQol. La satisfacción se evaluó mediante un conjunto de preguntas. Analizamos los datos previos y posteriores con pruebas de McNemar y modelos de regresión lineal y de Poisson ajustados. Resultados: A los 6 meses, los participantes mostraron mejoras en la salud percibida, en la salud mental y en la reducción de la ansiedad. Las mejoras fueron mayores entre las mujeres, las personas que no habían salido de casa durante ≥4 meses, las de bajo nivel educativo y las que habían realizado ≥9 salidas. La salud percibida (aRR: 1,29 [1,04-1,62]) y las mejoras en salud mental [(β: 2,92 [1,64-4,2]) permanecieron significativas en los modelos multivariados. La satisfacción media fue de 9,3 sobre 10. Conclusión: Esta intervención de salud comunitaria parece mejorar varios resultados de salud en las personas mayores aisladas, especialmente en los grupos más vulnerables. Replicar este tipo de intervención podría funcionar en contextos similares.(AU)

Objectives: To explore the health effects of a community health intervention on older people who are isolated at home due to mobility problems or architectural barriers, to identify associated characteristics and to assess participants’ satisfaction.Design: Quasi-experimental before–after study. Setting: Five low-income neighbourhoods of Barcelona during 2010–15. Participants: 147 participants, aged ≥59, living in isolation due to mobility problems or architectural barriers were interviewed before the intervention and after 6 months. Intervention: Primary Health Care teams, public health and social workers, and other community agents carried out a community health intervention, consisting of weekly outings, facilitated by volunteers. Measurements: We assessed self-rated health, mental health using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and quality of life through the EuroQol scale. Satisfaction with the programme was evaluated using a set of questions. We analysed pre and post data with McNemar tests and fitted lineal and Poisson regression models. Results: At 6 months, participants showed improvements in self-rated health and mental health and a reduction of anxiety. Improvements were greater among women, those who had not left home for ≥4 months, those with lower educational level, and those who had made ≥9 outings. Self-rated health [aRR: 1.29(1.04–1.62)] and mental health improvements [β: 2.92(1.64–4.2)] remained significant in the multivariate models. Mean satisfaction was 9.3 out of 10. Conclusion: This community health intervention appears to improve several health outcomes in isolated elderly people, especially among the most vulnerable groups. Replications of this type of intervention could work in similar contexts.(AU)

Improving mental health and wellbeing in elderly people isolated at home due to architectural barriers: A community health intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the health effects of a community health intervention on older people who are isolated at home due to mobility problems or architectural barriers, to identify associated characteristics and to assess participants' satisfaction. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental before-after study. SETTING: Five low-income neighbourhoods of Barcelona during 2010-15. PARTICIPANTS: 147 participants, aged ≥59, living in isolation due to mobility problems or architectural barriers were interviewed before the intervention and after 6 months. INTERVENTION: Primary Health Care teams, public health and social workers, and other community agents carried out a community health intervention, consisting of weekly outings, facilitated by volunteers. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed self-rated health, mental health using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and quality of life through the EuroQol scale. Satisfaction with the programme was evaluated using a set of questions. We analysed pre and post data with McNemar tests and fitted lineal and Poisson regression models. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants showed improvements in self-rated health and mental health and a reduction of anxiety. Improvements were greater among women, those who had not left home for ≥4 months, those with lower educational level, and those who had made ≥9 outings. Self-rated health [aRR: 1.29(1.04-1.62)] and mental health improvements [ß: 2.92(1.64-4.2)] remained significant in the multivariate models. Mean satisfaction was 9.3 out of 10. CONCLUSION: This community health intervention appears to improve several health outcomes in isolated elderly people, especially among the most vulnerable groups. Replications of this type of intervention could work in similar contexts.

Persistencia de tratamiento con antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral frente a antagonistas de interleucinas en psoriasis moderada-grave / Persistence of treatment with tumor necrosis factor antagonists versus interleukin antagonists in moderate-severe psoriasis

Objetivo: Evaluar y comparar el tiempo de persistencia y analizar los motivos de suspensión con fármacos antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral (anti-TNF) frente a antagonistas de interleucinas (anti-IL) en primera línea de tratamiento biológico en pacientes con psoriasis.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo observacional realizado entre 01/2010 y 05/2019. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos diagnosticados de psoriasis moderada-grave en tratamiento con anti-TNF o anti-IL en primera línea de tratamiento biológico. Se estudiaron variables demográficas y relacionadas con el tratamiento, calculándose el tiempo de persistencia con el fármaco de estudio, así como las suspensiones de tratamiento. Resultados: Se incluyeron 94 pacientes (39 mujeres) con una media de 49 años (desviación estándar 13,0), 46 (48,9%) pacientes tratados con anti-TNF (35/46 adalimumab y 11/46 etanercept) y 48 (51,1%) pacientes tratados con anti-IL (26/48 secukinumab, 15/48 ustekinumab y 7/48 ixekizumab). El tiempo de persistencia en primera línea de tratamiento biológico fue de 18,4 (rango intercuartílico (RIQ) 22,2) meses, siendo 9,3 (RIQ 21,7) meses superior en los pacientes tratados con anti-IL (24,7 vs. 15,4 meses; p=0,002). A la finalización del seguimiento el 38,3% (36/94) de la población había interrumpido el tratamiento, debido a: falta de efectividad (34,8% (16/46) anti-TNF vs. 14,6% (7/48) anti-IL; p=0,003), eventos adversos (2,2% (1/46) anti-TNF) y otros motivos (17,4% (8/46) anti-TNF vs. 8,3% (4/48) con anti-IL; p>0,05). Conclusiones: El tiempo de persistencia en primera línea de tratamiento biológico fue de 18,4 meses, siendo significativamente superior en los pacientes tratados con anti-IL. El principal motivo de suspensión fue la falta de efectividad en ambos grupos de tratamiento. (AU)

Objective: To evaluate and compare the time of persistence and to analyse the discontinuation reasons with tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) vs. interleukin antagonists (anti-IL) as first line with biological treatments in patients with psoriasis. Material and methods: Retrospective observational study carried out between 01/2010 and 05/2019. Adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe psoriasis in treatment with anti-TNF or anti-IL as first line with biological treatments were included. Demographic and treatment-related variables were studied, calculating the time of persistence with the study drug, as well as treatment discontinuations. Results: We included 94 patients (39 women) with a mean of 49 years (standard deviation 13.0), 46 (48.9%) patients treated with anti-TNF (35/46 adalimumab and 11/46 etanercept) and 48 (51.1%) patients treated with anti-IL (26/48 secukinumab, 15/48 ustekinumab and 7/48 ixekizumab). Persistence time with biological treatment in first line was 18.4 (interquartile range (IQR) 22.2) months, being 9.3 (IQR 21.7) months higher in patients treated with anti-IL (24.7 vs. 15.4 months; p=0.002). At the end of the follow-up, 38.3% (36/94) of the population had discontinued their treatments. The reasons for discontinuation were: lack of effectiveness (34.8% (16/46) anti-TNF vs. 14.6% (7/48) anti-IL; p=0.003), side effects (2.2% (1/46) anti-TNF) and other reasons (17.4% (8/46) anti-TNF vs. 8.3% (4/48) anti-IL; p>0.05). Conclusion: The persistence time with biological treatment in first line was 18.4 months, being significantly higher in the anti-IL group. The main reason of discontinuation was lack of effectiveness in both groups of treatment. (AU)