Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
J ISAKOS ; 9(3): 378-385, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242500

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Return to sport (RTS) is considered an indicator of successful recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In recent years, there has been major interest in documenting RTS following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Despite women being at increased risk for ACL injuries and a global increase in women's participation in sports, research has not adequately focused on female athletes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the RTS rate in female athletes after ACLR. We hypothesize that most of the female athletes can RTS. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Epistemonikos) were searched for articles reporting RTS rates and contextual data in female athletes. The following search terms were used: "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" OR "ACL reconstruction" AND "female" OR "women" AND "return to sports" OR "return to play" to retrieve all relevant articles published between 2003 and 2023. A quality assessment of the included studies was conducted. FINDINGS: Fifteen articles were included, reporting on 1456 female athletes participating in pivoting sports. The included studies comprised 9 cohorts, 1 case-control study, 2 case series, 2 descriptive epidemiology studies, and 1 observational study. Eight out of fifteen studies focused solely on elite-level athletes. The participants had a mean age of 23.13 years. Soccer was the most prevalent sport among the participants, accounting for 49.7% of all athletes included. All 15 studies reported an RTS rate, yielding a meta-proportion of 69% [95% CI, 58-80%] for RTS. Nine articles reported the average time to RTS, which was 10.8 months [95% CI, 8.7-12.8 months]. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that a majority of female athletes (69 â€‹%) can RTS participation at an average of 10.8 months, however, the available information is insufficient, and quantitative data and reasons for not returning to play are lacking. Future studies should establish return-to-play criteria in this population and determine reasons for not returning to play. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Athletes , Return to Sport , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Female , Return to Sport/statistics & numerical data , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Athletes/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/surgery
2.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 27(6): 100573, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Playing football involves a high risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and these may affect knee function and activity level. OBJECTIVES: To measure changes in self-reported knee function, activity level, and satisfaction with knee function and activity level in female football players with or without an ACL-reconstructed knee. METHODS: Female football players, age 19.9 (SD 2.6) years, with either a primary ACL-reconstruction 1.6 (SD 0.7) years after ACL-reconstruction (n = 186) or no ACL injury (n = 113) were followed prospectively for five years. Self-reported data collected at baseline and follow-up included knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form [IKDC-SKF]), activity level (Tegner Activity Scale), and satisfaction with knee function (Likert scale 1=happy; 7=unhappy) and activity level (1-10 scale). Information on any new ACL injury during the follow-up period was collected. RESULTS: Players with ACL-reconstruction at baseline who either did (n = 56) or did not (n = 130) sustain an additional ACL injury, and players with no injury at baseline who remained injury free (n = 101) had a lower Tegner score at follow-up. Players with additional ACL injury had lower IKDC-SKF score (mean difference: -11.4, 95% CI: -16.0, -6.7), and satisfaction with activity level (mean difference: -1.5, 95% CI: -2.3, -0.7) at follow-up. Players with no additional ACL injury had higher satisfaction with knee function (mean difference: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3, 0.9) at follow-up. Players with no ACL injury had lower satisfaction with activity level (mean difference: -0.7, 95% CI: -1.1, -0.3) at follow-up. Players with additional ACL injury had larger decreases in all variables measured compared to the two other groups. CONCLUSION: Primary, and even more so additional, ACL injuries decreased self-reported knee function, activity level, and satisfaction with knee function and activity level in female football players.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Athletic Injuries , Knee Joint , Soccer , Adult , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Self Report , Soccer/injuries , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology
3.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 31(12): 5913-5923, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991534

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) determine the proportion of patients who underwent anterior shoulder instability surgery and did not return to sports for psychological reasons and (2) estimate differences in psychological readiness scores between patients who did and did not return to sports. METHODS: The EBSCOhost/SPORTDiscus, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. The data synthesis included the proportion of patients who did not return to sports for psychological reasons and the mean differences in the psychological readiness of athletes who returned and those who did not return to sports. Non-binomial data were analysed using the inverse-variance approach and expressed as the mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search yielded 700 records, of which 13 (1093 patients) were included. Fourteen psychological factors were identified as potential causes for not returning to sports. The rates of return to sports at any level or to the preinjury level were 79.3% and 61.9%, respectively. A total of 55.9% of the patients cited psychological factors as the primary reason for not returning to sports. The pooled estimate showed that patients who returned to sports had a significantly higher Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport After Injury score (P < 0.00001) than those who did not, with a mean difference of 30.24 (95% CI 24.95-35.53; I2 = 0%; n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological factors have a substantial impact on the rate of return to sports after anterior shoulder instability surgery. Patients who returned to sports had significantly higher psychological readiness than those who did not return to sports. Based on these results, healthcare professionals should include psychological and functional measurements when assessing athletes' readiness to return to sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Joint , Sports , Humans , Return to Sport/psychology , Joint Instability/surgery , Shoulder , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Sports/psychology
4.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(12): 3318-3325, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36018821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Literature is scarce regarding the influence of psychological readiness on return to sports after shoulder instability surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive ability of the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score in measuring the effect of psychological readiness on return to sports and to compare it between athletes who returned to sports and athletes who did not return to sports. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair or a Latarjet procedure between January 2019 and September 2020. Psychological readiness to return to play was evaluated using the SIRSI instrument. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were measured by the Rowe, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores. The predictive validity of the SIRSI was assessed by the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics. The Youden index was calculated and used to determine a SIRSI score cutoff point that best discriminated psychological readiness to return to sports. A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of psychological readiness on return to sports and return to preinjury sports level. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included in this study. Overall, 79% returned to sports. The SIRSI had excellent predictive ability for return-to-sport outcomes (return to sports: area under ROC curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.93]; return to preinjury sports level: area under ROC curve, 0.96; [95% CI, 0.8-0.9]). A cutoff level of ≥55 was used to determine whether an athlete was psychologically ready to return to sports and to return to preinjury sports level (Youden index, 0.7 and 0.9, respectively). Of those who returned to sports, 76.8% were psychologically ready to return to play, with a median SIRSI score of 65 (interquartile range, 57-80). In comparison, in the group that did not return to sports, only 4.5% achieved psychological readiness with a median SIRSI score of 38.5 (interquartile range, 35-41) (P < .001). Regression analysis for the effect of SIRSI score on return to sports was performed. For every 10-point increase in the SIRSI score, the odds of returning to sports increased by 2.9 times. Moreover, those who did not achieve their preinjury sports level showed poorer psychological readiness to return to play and SIRSI score results. CONCLUSION: The SIRSI was a useful tool for predicting whether patients were psychologically ready to return to sports after glenohumeral stabilization surgery. Patients who returned to sports and those who returned to their preinjury sports level were significantly more psychologically ready than those who did not return. Therefore, we believe that the SIRSI score should be considered along with other criteria that are used to decide whether the patient is ready to return to sports.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Dislocation , Shoulder Joint , Sports , Arthroscopy/methods , Cohort Studies , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery
5.
Open Access J Sports Med ; 13: 35-40, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35401017

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have reported high rates of return to sports following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) However, there is enormous controversy regarding the optimal management of these patients in the postoperative period. Controversy issues include rehabilitation, criteria for returning to sports, and the specific management of each athlete according to the sport they practice. Even though there are several rehabilitation protocols published in the literature, wide variability exists concerning the key elements of rehabilitation after an ABR. Regarding criteria for return to sports, there is a wide variation across the different published studies. The type of sports has been shown to affect an athlete's decision to return to sports. Nevertheless, most research is evaluated by classifications that cluster different sports into categories that may have other influences in return to sports when analyzed separately. Finally, in addition to physical readiness, the athlete's psychological state is crucial for returning to sports. However, the contribution of psychological readiness to an athlete's return to sports after shoulder instability surgery remains uncertain and unexplored.

6.
Int Orthop ; 46(6): 1351-1360, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35348832

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SLAP injuries are common in athletes but there is no consensus on different aspects such as pathophysiology and treatment options. Currently, the main controversy in the treatment of SLAP II injuries is deciding whether to make a repair or tenodesis. Clinical outcomes have varied according to the patients' age, sports, or work activity. This review aims to present the evidence at points of contention regarding pathophysiology, treatment options, outcomes, return to activities, and complications of type II SLAP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The relevant literature on SLAP injuries and their treatment options and results were identified from PubMed and a narrative review was performed. RESULTS: Repairing SLAP II injuries seems to show better outcomes in younger patients and athletes who perform overhead movements, while tenodesis (in its various technical options) yields better outcomes in older patients, both as a single injury or associated with other pathologies such as rotator cuff injury or tenosynovitis. On the other hand, there currently seems to be a trend of increasing the indication of tenodesis even in underage patients and athletes, given that there are reports of fewer re-operations and a faster recovery. CONCLUSION: The evidence is unclear as to which factors influence the failure to achieve optimal outcomes even in cases with anatomical repairs. Studies with a high level of evidence including different variables are necessary to define when to repair, perform tenodesis, and what surgical technique to use for both options.


Subject(s)
Shoulder Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Tenodesis , Aged , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Arthroscopy/methods , Athletes , Humans , Shoulder Injuries/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Tenodesis/adverse effects , Tenodesis/methods
7.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(7): 23259671211013394, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34368378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information regarding the reasons why patients do not return to sports after an arthroscopic Bankart repair and whether there is a relationship between return to sports and functional outcomes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reasons why competitive athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair did not return to sports and whether there was a relationship between returning to sports and postoperative outcome scores and complications. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Of 217 competitive athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for isolated anterior glenohumeral instability between June 2014 and December 2017, a total of 208 athletes (96%) were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. Return to sports, the level of sports achieved, and the time between surgery and return to competition were assessed, and patients who did not return to sports were asked to provide the reasons for cessation. The Rowe score and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 24 years (range, 18-30 years), and the mean follow-up was 44 months (range, 24-90 months). Of the 208 athletes, 73% were able to return to sports (65% returned to their preinjury level), and 27% did not return to sports. Of those who did not return, the most frequent reasons were fear of reinjury (44%), lack of confidence in their shoulder (12%), and concern about a new rehabilitation process in case of recurrence (10%). The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed significant postoperative improvement in all patients (P < .001), with no significant differences between the 2 study groups at the final follow-up. There were 21 recurrences (10%) and 5 complications (2.4%), and 11 patients (5.3%) underwent revision surgery, with no significant differences in these rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: Of patients who did not return to sports, 74% left for a reason independent of shoulder function, with the most frequent causes being fear of reinjury and a concern about new rehabilitation process. Neither outcome scores nor complications varied significantly between patients who returned and those who did not return to sports.

8.
Rev. bras. med. esporte ; Rev. bras. med. esporte;26(6): 478-486, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144193

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear represents more than half of all knee injuries in sports that involve body rotations and sudden changes of direction. Discharging the athlete for return to play (RTP) post-ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a difficult task with multidisciplinary responsibility. For many years, a six-month period post-ACLR was adopted as the only criterion for RTP. However, it is now suggested that RTP should not be exclusively time-based, but to clinical data and systematic assessments. Despite the importance of post-ACLR factors for RTP, pre- and peri-ACLR factors must also be considered. Historically, ACLR is performed with the hamstring or autologous patellar tendons, although the choice of graft is still an open and constantly evolving theme. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and repair of meniscal ramp tear associated with ACLR have recently been suggested as strategies for improving knee joint stability. Subjective questionnaires are easy to apply, and help identify physical or psychological factors that can hamper RTP. Functional tests, such as hop tests and strength assessment by means of isokinetic dynamometers, are fundamental tools for decision making when associated with clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, the capacity to generate force explosively has been incorporated into the muscle strength assessment. This is quantified through the rate of torque development (RTD). Due to characteristics inherent to the practice of sport, there is an extremely short time available for produce strength. Thus, RTD seems to better represent athletic demands than the maximum strength assessment alone. This review investigates the pre-, peri- and post-ACLR factors established in the literature, and shares our clinical practice, which we consider to be best practice for RTP. Level of evidence V; Specialist opinion.


RESUMO A ruptura do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) representa mais da metade das lesões do joelho em esportes que envolvem rotações e mudanças repentinas de direção. A liberação do atleta para o retorno ao esporte (RAE) depois da reconstrução do LCA (RLCA) é uma tarefa difícil, de responsabilidade multidisciplinar. Por muitos anos, o período de seis meses pós-RLCA foi utilizado como único critério para RAE. Contudo, atualmente, sugere-se que o RAE não deve estar atrelado exclusivamente ao tempo, mas a dados clínicos e avaliações sistemáticas. Apesar da importância dos fatores pós-RLCA para o RAE, os fatores pré- e peri-RLCA também devem ser contemplados. Historicamente, a RLCA é realizada com tendões isquiotibiais ou patelares autólogos, apesar da escolha do enxerto ainda ser um tema em aberto e em constante evolução. Recentemente, a reconstrução do ligamento anterolateral e o reparo da lesão na rampa meniscal associadas à RLCA têm sido sugeridas como estratégias para melhorar a estabilidade articular do joelho. Questionários subjetivos são de fácil aplicação e ajudam a identificar fatores físicos ou psicológicos que possam dificultar o RAE. Testes funcionais como os hop tests e a avaliação de força com dinamômetros isocinéticos são ferramentas fundamentais na decisão quando aliadas à avaliação clínica e de ressonância magnética. Recentemente, tem-se incorporado ao escopo de avaliação da força muscular a capacidade de gerar força de maneira explosiva, mensurada através da taxa de desenvolvimento de torque (TDT). Devido a características inerentes a prática esportiva os tempos disponíveis para produção de força são demasiadamente pequenos e, sendo assim, a TDT parece representar melhor as demandas esportivas do que a avaliação isolada de força máxima. Nesta revisão, foram reunidos fatores pré, peri e pós-RLCA estabelecidos na literatura, assim como foi compartilhada nossa prática clínica, que consideramos ser a melhor para o RAE. Nível de evidência V; Opinião do especialista.


RESUMEN La ruptura del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) representa más de la mitad de las lesiones de rodilla en deportes que involucran rotaciones y cambios repentinos de dirección. La liberación del atleta para el retorno al deporte (RAD) después de la reconstrucción del LCA (RLCA) es una tarea difícil, de responsabilidad multidisciplinaria. Durante muchos años, el período de seis meses post-RLCA fue usado como único criterio para RAD. Sin embargo, actualmente, se sugiere que el RAD no debe estar vinculado exclusivamente al tiempo, sino a datos clínicos y evaluaciones sistemáticas. A pesar de la importancia de los factores post-RLCA para el RAD, también deben ser contemplados los factores pre y peri-RLCA. Históricamente, la RLCA es realizada con tendones isquiotibiales o patelares autólogos, a pesar de que la elección del injerto aún sea un tema abierto y en constante evolución. Recientemente, la reconstrucción del ligamento anterolateral y la reparación de la lesión en la rampa meniscal asociadas a la RLCA han sido sugeridas como estrategias para mejorar la estabilidad articular de la rodilla. Los cuestionarios subjetivos son de fácil aplicación y ayudan a identificar los factores físicos o psicológicos que pueden dificultar el RAD. Los tests funcionales como los hop tests y la evaluación de fuerza con dinamómetros isocinéticos son herramientas fundamentales en la decisión cuando se combinan a la evaluación clínica y de resonancia magnética. Recientemente, se ha incorporado al alcance de evaluación de la fuerza muscular, la capacidad de generar fuerza de manera explosiva, medida a través de la tasa de desarrollo de torque (TDT). Debido a características inherentes a la práctica deportiva, los tiempos disponibles para producción de fuerza son demasiado pequeños y, siendo así, la TDT parece representar mejor las demandas deportivas que la evaluación aislada de fuerza máxima. En esta revisión fueron reunidos factores pre, peri y post-RLCA establecidos en la literatura, así como fue compartida nuestra práctica clínica, que consideramos la mejor para el RAD. Nivel de evidencia V; Opinión del especialista.

9.
EFORT Open Rev ; 5(3): 138-144, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32296547

ABSTRACT

After failed conservative management, operative intervention is typically indicated for patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) with persistent pain and disability symptoms.For PTRCTs involving < 50% of the tendon thickness, debridement with or without acromioplasty resulted in favourable outcomes in most studies.For PTRCTs involving > 50% of the tendon thickness, in situ repair has proven to significantly improve pain and functional outcomes for articular and bursal PTRCTs.The few available comparative studies in the literature showed similar functional and structural outcomes between in situ repair and repair after conversion to full-thickness tear for PTRCTs.Most non-overhead athletes return to sports at the same level as previous to the injury after in situ repair of PTRCTs. However, rates of return to preinjury level of competition for overhead athletes have been generally poor regardless of the utilized technique.During long-term follow-up, arthroscopic in situ repair of articular and bursal PTRCTs produced excellent functional outcomes in most patients, with a low rate of revision. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:138-144. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190010.

10.
Rev. chil. ortop. traumatol ; 61(1): 2-10, mar. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1291830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Analyze return to sports and related factors after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Observational descriptive study. 173 patients operated by the same surgeon and standardized technique (patellar autograft) who answered a questionnaire at least 12 months post procedure were included. Questionnaire included Subjective IKDC, Tegner activity level (Pre and Postoperative) and questions elaborated by the group. RESULTS: Mean age was 30.8 years, 85% were men, 73% practiced soccer and median postoperative IKDC was 71. Follow up until questionnaire response was 28 months. Males had a better return to sports than females (70% vs 48%, p » 0.037). Tegner preinjury level was 5 vs 4.3 postoperative, (p < 0.001). Return to sports was 67% according to Tegner scale and 66% by self-assessment. Return to similar previous activity level was 57% by Tegner scale but 24% by direct questions. Of those patients, 51% have fear of reinjury and 26% by reasons other than knee or surgery. We didn't find association between meniscal injuries and return to sports rate. Patients with chondral injuries had lower rates in return to sports (35% vs 60%, p » 0.002). Subjects that returned to sports had higher IKDC scores (73.5 vs 64.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found 67% return to sports and 57% to the preinjury level. Positive return to sports factors were male sex, absence of chondral injury and better functional outcome. Psychological factors such as fear of injury is frequent in patients who don't achieve previous levels of activity.


OBJETIVOS: Analizar el retorno deportivo y factores asociados tras la reconstrucción primaria de ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA). MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional descriptivo. Se incluyeron 173 operados entre 2014 y 2017 por el mismo cirujano, los cuales contestaron un cuestionario al menos 12 meses después de la cirugía. El cuestionario incluye IKDC subjetivo, Tegner activity level (pre y post operatorio) y preguntas de elaboración propia. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio es 30,8 años, el 85% son hombres, el 73% practicaba fútbol y la mediana del IKDC fue 71. La media de meses hasta responder el cuestionario fue de 28 meses. Tegner pre-lesión promedio fue de 5 vs 4,3 postoperatorio, p < 0,001. Según la escala Tegner el 57% retorna al mismo nivel previo, sin embargo, de acuerdo con el cuestionario propio solo el 24% lo haría. De ese subgrupo, el 51% tiene temor a lesionarse de nuevo y el 26% reporta razones no relacionadas a la rodilla. No encontramos asociación entre lesiones meniscales y la tasa de retorno. Aquellos que retornan tienen menor prevalencia de lesiones condrales (35% vs 60%, p » 0,002). Los pacientes que retornaron tuvieron un IKDC superior (73,5 vs 64,3, p < 0,001). El sexo masculino tiene una tasa de retorno de 70% vs 48% de su contraparte femenina (p » 0,037). CONCLUSIONES: El 67% retorna al deporte y el 57% lo hace al mismo nivel. Factores positivos relacionados al retorno fueron sexo masculino, ausencia de lesión condral y mejor resultado funcional. Factores psicológicos con el miedo a lesionarse de nuevo son frecuentes en pacientes que no recuperan el nivel previo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Return to Sport , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Fear , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/psychology , Reinjuries/psychology
11.
Rev. chil. ortop. traumatol ; 60(2): 35-38, oct. 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1095951

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to assess the return to play among amateur soccer league players after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The surgical protocols of ACL reconstruction surgeries performed in a sports medicine clinic from July 1st, 2013, to June 30th, 2014, were included in the study. Only the charts of amateur soccer league players who played once or twice a week were selected. The follow-up time was calculated as the number of months between surgery and the telephone survey. At the follow-up, the current status of the soccer playing was recorded. Those patients who were no longer playing in a team were asked what kind of sport they were currently practicing, as well as the main reason for not returning to team playing. RESULTS: A total of 61 (25.6%) patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was of 22.4 3.4 months. At the follow-up, 30 (49.1%) patients were playing in amateur soccer teams. Among the patients who were no longer playing in a team, 19 (61.2%) were playing soccer occasionally, 11 (35.4%) were practicing other sports, and 1 developed a sedentary life style. The reasons for not returning to team playing were: fear of reinjury in 26%; knee symptoms in 26%; lack of confidence in the knee in 23%, family or job commitments in 23%; and not being eligible to participate in competitive sports in 2%. CONCLUSION: After an average of two years of ACL reconstruction, only half of the amateur soccer league players return to play.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Soccer , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Return to Sport , Follow-Up Studies
12.
Cienc. act. fís. (Talca, En línea) ; 18(2): 1-13, jul. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-986336

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes: la articulación de la rodilla es una de las más afectadas y lesionadas, siendo la lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior (ACL) la más frecuente entre ellas, alcanzando aproximadamente el 79% de todas las lesiones de rodilla. Esta lesión, cuando involucra atletas, causa compromisos físicos, fisiológicos y especialmente psicológicos, considerando la alta tasa de incidencia o lesión contralateral después de regresar al deporte. Este compromiso a veces aleja al atleta del deporte, o disminuye su rendimiento. Toda esta limitación o deterioro afecta directamente la calidad de vida de los atletas. Caso clínico: en el presente estudio se realizó seguimiento de una atleta femenina de balonmano durante 15 años, que fue sometida a 3 reconstrucciones del LCA, para evaluar el deterioro físico, funcional y psicológico que estas cirugías causaron a lo largo de los años. Con-clusión: se comprobó que el paciente se alejó por completo de las actividades posteriores a las cirugías, además de haber desarrollado un severo proceso de artrosis como consecuencia de un importante déficit muscular.


Background information: the knee joint is one of the most affected and injured joints in the body, with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury being the most common (about 79%). Howe-ver, when this injury involves athletes, not only does it cause physical damage, but physiological and, particularly, psychological as well, as it has a high recurrence rate or provokes a contralateral injury after returning to sports. This damage sometimes steers the athlete away from sports al-together, or performance decreases. Hence, these limitations or impairments directly affect the athletesÍ´ quality of life. Case report: in this study, monitoring or a follow up of a female handball athlete who had to undergo three reconstructions of the ACL was carried for 15 years in order to evaluate the physical, functional and psychological impairment that these surgeries caused over the years. Conclusion: it can be verified that the patient completely steered away from sports activities after the surgeries and developed a severe arthrosis process as a consequence of serious muscular deficit.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Quality of Life , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/psychology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/psychology , Follow-Up Studies , Return to Sport , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology
13.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 25(10): 3319-3325, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085364

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to report the effects of autologous PRP injections on time to return to play and recurrence rate after acute grade 2 muscle injuries in recreational and competitive athletes. METHODS: Seventy-five patients diagnosed with acute muscle injuries were randomly allocated to autologous PRP therapy combined with a rehabilitation programme or a rehabilitation programme only. The primary outcome of this study was time to return to play. In addition, changes in pain severity and recurrence rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in the PRP group achieved full recovery significantly earlier than controls (P = 0.001). The mean time to return to play was 21.1 ± 3.1 days and 25 ± 2.8 days for the PRP and control groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Significantly lower pain severity scores were observed in the PRP group throughout the study. The difference in the recurrence rate after 2-year-follow-up was not statistically significant between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single PRP injection combined with a rehabilitation programme significantly shortened time to return to sports compared to a rehabilitation programme only. Recurrence rate was not significantly different between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/therapy , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Return to Sport/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
14.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 4(10): 2325967116669310, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27826596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic treatment of calcific deposits of rotator cuff tears has been described with successful results in the general population. However, despite the high frequency of this condition, there is no information in the literature regarding arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff calcifications in athletes. PURPOSE: To analyze the time to return to sport, clinical outcomes, and complications of complete arthroscopic removal of intratendinous calcific deposits and repair of the tendon lesion without acromioplasty in athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 24 consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.2 years. The mean follow-up was 59 months (range, 24-108 months). Patients completed a questionnaire focused on the time to return to sport and treatment course. Pre- and postoperative functional assessment was performed using the Constant score and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to evaluate the recurrence of calcifications and the indemnity of the supraspinatus tendon repair. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 23 (95.8%) were able to return to sports; 91.3% returned to the same level. The mean time to return to play was 5.3 months (range, 3-9 months): 26% of patients (6/23) returned to sports in less than 4 months, 61% (14/24) returned between 4 and 6 months, and 13% (3/24) returned after the sixth month. The mean Constant score increased from 26.9 preoperatively to 89.7 postoperatively (P < .001), and the UCLA score increased from 17.3 preoperatively to 33.2 postoperatively (P < .001). Significant improvement was obtained for pain (mean VAS, 8.4 [before surgery] vs 0.6 [after]; P < .001). The overall majority (91.6%) of patients were satisfied with their result. MRI examination at last follow-up (79% of patients) showed no tendon tears. CONCLUSION: In athletes with calcifying tendinitis of the supraspinatus tendon with failed nonoperative treatment, complete arthroscopic removal of calcific deposits and tendon repair without acromioplasty results in significant pain relief and improvement in functional outcomes. Most patients return to the same level of proficiency regardless of the type of sport and the level of competition before injury, with 91.6% of patients satisfied with their results.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL