ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have had a central role in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. The management of these patients who become dependent to steroids is complex, involving different immunosuppressive drugs patterns. The monoclonal antibody anti CD20, Rituximab, is likely to have beneficial effects in cases of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome patients with no easy resolution, even when we cannot make a statement about the specific role in the impact. We bring our personal experience in pediatric patients treated with this medication during the last years, to provide a thorough overview and useful information about the role of Rituximab in this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective study in patients with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome controlled in the division of Pediatric Nephrology of a Spanish tertiary hospital in those patients who had received at least one treatment cycle of Rituximab, at any moment along the evolution of the disease. RESULTS: The study involved 8 patients. All of them previously received immunosuppressive therapy. The Rituximab were administered as an intravenous infusion, in a dose of 375 mg/m2, and all doses were administered in a period during which the disease was in remission. The depletion of lymphocytes B (CD19, 0%) were confirmed after the first dose of Rituximab except for one, with a lymphocyte count of 1%. The period of depletion lasts 10,3 months (median; range 6,5-16 months), and only one of the patients registered a relapse of the disease in this period. A reduction of relapses suffered by patients has been shown after the treatment began (3,6 relapses/year in the previous year to the start of the treatment versus 0,1 relapses/year during the first year post-rituximab). The relapse-free survival in the first year reached 83,3% in patients who suffered more than one relapse (75% of patients), and without a relapse after the treatment began in 2 cases. One or more drugs could be removed in 87,5% of patients after the first cycle of rituximab. After the rituximab treatment, we reached a 96,5% decrease in the corticosteroids doses administered (28,5 mg/m2/day during the 3 months pre-treatment versus 1 mg/m2/day in the last 3 months of patient monitoring). Not a significant observed adverse effect attributed to the drug after the post-rituximab monitoring period (median 46,5 months, range 5-97 months). CONCLUSION: The favorable results reported after rituximab treatment in our patients seems to confirm the effectiveness of this drug in the steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, making that therapeutic option into consideration and legitimating the use of the drug in complex cases involving pediatric patients. Even so, it seems recommendable to design pertinent studies to clarify, among others, the optimum regimen of the treatment (dose, interval and cycles), clinical repercussion and potential adverse effects in long terms.
Subject(s)
Nephrotic Syndrome , Child , Humans , Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/adverse effects , Steroids/therapeutic use , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
Introducción: La corticoterapia continúa siendo la piedra angular en el tratamiento del síndrome nefrótico. El manejo de los pacientes que desarrollan dependencia a esteroides es complejo, implicando distintas pautas de fármacos inmunosupresores. El rituximab, anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CD20, parece tener efectos beneficiosos en pacientes con síndrome nefrótico córtico-dependiente de difícil manejo clínico, si bien aún no está bien definido su papel en esta entidad. Con el fin de aportar información útil sobre el papel del rituximab en esta patología, presentamos nuestra experiencia personal en pacientes pediátricos tratados con este fármaco en los últimos años. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en pacientes con síndrome nefrótico idiopático córtico-dependiente controlados en la Sección de Nefrología Pediátrica de un hospital terciario español, y que habían recibido, al menos, un ciclo de tratamiento con rituximab durante cualquier momento de la evolución de la enfermedad. (AU)
Background: Corticosteroids have had a central role in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. The management of these patients who become dependent to steroids is complex, involving different immunosuppressive drugs patterns. The monoclonal antibody anti CD20, Rituximab, is likely to have beneficial effects in cases of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome patients with no easy resolution, even when we cannot make a statement about the specific role in the impact. We bring our personal experience in pediatric patients treated with this medication during the last years, to provide a thorough overview and useful information about the role of Rituximab in this pathology. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome controlled in the division of Pediatric Nephrology of a spanish tertiary hospital in those patients who had received at least one treatment cycle of Rituximab, at any moment along the evolution of the disease. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Child, Preschool , Child , Rituximab , Nephrotic Syndrome , Pediatrics , TherapeuticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have had a central role in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. The management of these patients who become dependent to steroids is complex, involving different immunosuppressive drugs patterns. The monoclonal antibody anti CD20, Rituximab, is likely to have beneficial effects in cases of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome patients with no easy resolution, even when we cannot make a statement about the specific role in the impact. We bring our personal experience in pediatric patients treated with this medication during the last years, to provide a thorough overview and useful information about the role of Rituximab in this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective study in patients with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome controlled in the division of Pediatric Nephrology of a spanish tertiary hospital in those patients who had received at least one treatment cycle of Rituximab, at any moment along the evolution of the disease. RESULTS: The study involved 8 patients. All of them previously received immunosuppressive therapy. The Rituximab were administered as an intravenous infusion, in a dose of 375 mg/m2, and all doses were administered in a period during which the disease was in remission. The depletion of lymphocytes B (CD 19%) were confirmed after the first dose of Rituximab except for one, with a lymphocyte count of 1%. The period of depletion lasts 10.3 months (median; range 6.5-16 months), and only one of the patients registered a relapse of the disease in this period. A reduction of relapses suffered by patients has been shown after the treatment began (3.6 relapses/year in the previous year to the start of the treatment vs. 0.1 relapses/year during the first year post-rituximab). The relapse-free survival in the first year reached 83.3% in patients who suffered more than one relapse (75% of patients), and without a relapse after the treatment began in 2 cases. One or more drugs could be removed in 87.5% of patients after the first cycle of rituximab. After the rituximab treatment, we reached a 96.5% decrease in the corticosteroids doses administered (28.5 mg/m2/day during the 3 months pre-treatment vs. 1 mg/m2/day in the last 3 months of patient monitoring). Not a significant observed adverse effect attributed to the drug after the post-rituximab monitoring period (median 46.5 months, range 5-97 months). CONCLUSION: The favorable results reported after rituximab treatment in our patients seems to confirm the effectiveness of this drug in the steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, making that therapeutic option into consideration and legitimating the use of the drug in complex cases involving pediatric patients. Even so, it seems recommendable to design pertinent studies to clarify, among others, the optimum regimen of the treatment (dose, interval and cycles), clinical repercussion and potential adverse effects in long terms.
ABSTRACT
Resumen: Introducción: En el síndrome nefrótico cortico-sensible (SNCS), la corticoterapia prolongada podría reducir la frecuencia de recaídas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue la comparación de un esquema corticoide prolongado frente al tratamiento habitual del SNCS primario, evaluando los siguientes parámetros: el número de pacientes con recaídas, el número total de recaídas, el tiempo medio transcurrido al iniciar el tratamiento, hasta la remisión y hasta la primera recaída, la dosis acumulada de corticosteroides y la toxicidad esteroide. Métodos: La población se dividió en dos grupos: el grupo A (27 pacientes) recibió 16-β-metilprednisona durante 12 semanas, reduciendo la dosis hasta la semana 24; y el grupo B (29 pacientes) recibió 16-β-metilprednisona durante 12 semanas, y placebo hasta la semana 24. Resultados: La tasa de incidencia acumulada de recaídas (persona/año) fue en el grupo A 36/100, y en el grupo B 66/100 (p = 0.04). El tiempo medio transcurrido (días) hasta la primera recaída fue de 114 en el grupo A y 75 en el grupo B (p = 0.01). Las diferencias de tiempo transcurrido al iniciar tratamiento y hasta la remisión entre ambos grupos no fueron significativas. El total acumulado de recaídas fue de 9 en el grupo A y 17 en el grupo B (p = 0.04), y el total de pacientes con recaídas fue de 3 (grupo A) y 7 (grupo B) (p = 0.17). La dosis media acumulada (mg/m2) por paciente fue de 5,243 en el grupo A y de 4,306 en el grupo B (p = 0.3), y el cortisol sérico (μg/dl) final fue de 14 en el grupo A y 16 en el grupo B (p = 0.4). La toxicidad esteroide fue similar entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: La duración del tratamiento disminuyó el número de recaídas, sin incrementar la toxicidad esteroide.
Abstract: Background: In the steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) the prolonged treatment with steroids could decrease the frequency of relapses. We conducted a comparative study of prolonged steroid scheme and the usual treatment of primary SSNS to assess: the number of patients with relapses, mean time to treatment initiation, to remission and to first relapse, total number of relapses, total cumulative dose of steroids, and the steroid toxicity. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: group A (27 patients) received 16-β-methylprednisolone for 12 weeks, reducing the steroid until week 24. Group B (29 patients) received 16-β-methylprednisolone for 12 weeks and placebo until week 24. Results: Cumulative incidence rate of relapse (person/years) for group A was of 36/100 and 66/100 for group B (p = 0.04). Average elapsed time to first relapse was of 114 days for group A and of 75 days to for group B (p = 0.01). The difference in time for initial response to treatment and up to achieve remission between both groups was not significant. Total cumulative relapses were 9 for group A and 17 for group B (p = 0.04). Total patients with relapses were 3 for group A and 7 for group B (p = 0.17). Cumulative average dose per patient was 5,243 mg/m2 for group A and 4,306 mg/m2 for group B (p = 0.3), and serum cortisol was 14 μg/dl for group A and 16 μg/dl for group B (p = 0.4). There were no steroid toxicity differences between groups. Conclusions: The duration of the treatment had an impact on the number of relapses without increasing steroid toxicity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) the prolonged treatment with steroids could decrease the frequency of relapses. We conducted a comparative study of prolonged steroid scheme and the usual treatment of primary SSNS to assess: the number of patients with relapses, mean time to treatment initiation, to remission and to first relapse, total number of relapses, total cumulative dose of steroids, and the steroid toxicity. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: group A (27 patients) received 16-ß-methylprednisolone for 12 weeks, reducing the steroid until week 24. Group B (29 patients) received 16-ß-methylprednisolone for 12 weeks and placebo until week 24. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence rate of relapse (person/years) for group A was of 36/100 and 66/100 for group B (p=0.04). Average elapsed time to first relapse was of 114 days for group A and of 75 days to for group B (p=0.01). The difference in time for initial response to treatment and up to achieve remission between both groups was not significant. Total cumulative relapses were 9 for group A and 17 for group B (p=0.04). Total patients with relapses were 3 for group A and 7 for group B (p=0.17). Cumulative average dose per patient was 5,243mg/m2 for group A and 4,306mg/m2 for group B (p=0.3), and serum cortisol was 14µg/dl for group A and 16µg/dl for group B (p=0.4). There were no steroid toxicity differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the treatment had an impact on the number of relapses without increasing steroid toxicity.
