Ultrasound-guided scalp nerve block in anesthesia of children receiving cranial suture reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Analgesia is very important for children with craniosynostosis who are undergoing cranial suture reconstruction. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of an analgesic technique based on scalp nerve block combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 60 children aged 6-24 months who underwent cranial suture reconstruction were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (general anesthesia combined with scalp nerve block) and Group N (general anesthesia). The hemodynamics were recorded preoperatively, at 5 min after incision and at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery; the pain was scored at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery, and blood glucose was detected at 1 h after surgery. RESULTS: The mean arterial pressure and heart rate at 5 min after incision and 1 h after surgery in Group N were higher than those in Group A; the blood glucose and FLACC score in Group N were higher than those in Group A; and the number of postoperative analgesic pump presses were also significantly increased in Group N. CONCLUSION: Preoperative scalp nerve block can reduce hemodynamic fluctuation and postoperative pain in children undergoing cranial suture reconstruction for craniosynostosis. Thus, it can be safely and effectively applied in the anesthesia of these children.

The Efficacy of Scalp Nerve Block in Postoperative Pain Management after Microvascular Decompression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The scalp nerve block, created by injecting local anesthetics around the scalp nerves, is reported to effectively reduce pain after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of scalp nerve block in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Seventy-four patients who underwent MVD for HFS were enrolled. The block group received scalp nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine before surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative dose of rescue analgesics 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were included pain scores, postoperative antiemetic consumption, and Quality of Recovery-15 scale. The cumulative dose of rescue analgesics at 24 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the two groups (4.80 ± 3.64 mg vs. 5.92 ± 3.95 mg, p = 0.633). However, the pain score was significantly reduced in the block group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative antiemetic consumption was lower in the block group than the control group at 12 h. There were no significant differences between the two groups for other secondary outcomes. In MVD for HFS, a preoperative scalp nerve block might reduce postoperative pain in the early postoperative period, but a larger study using a multimodal approach is needed to confirm the efficacy of a scalp block.

Anatomical considerations of cutaneous nerves of scalp for an effective anesthetic blockade for procedures on the scalp.

Objective: The anatomy of the scalp nerves varies widely with age, race, and individuals of the same race and even within the same individual and hence need to be studied extensively to avoid complications and improve effectiveness during various surgical and anesthetic procedures of the scalp. Materials and Methods: Gross dissection was carried out on 11 cadavers (22 Hemifaces: 11 right and 11 left) with no obvious scalp deformities or surgeries. The distances of the supraorbital nerve (SON), supratrochlear nerve (STN), and greater occipital nerve (GON) from commonly used bony landmarks were measured. The branching pattern and presence of accessory notches/foramina were noted. Results: SON and STN were found almost midway and at the junction between medial and middle one-third of the line joining midline and lateral orbital margin, respectively. The distances of STN and SON from the midline were about ½ and 3/4th of the transverse orbital diameters of the individual. GON was found at the medial 2/5 and lateral 3/5 of the line joining inion to the mastoid. In 40.9% cases, SON gave three branches while STN and GON remained as single trunks in 77.27% and 40.0% cases, respectively. Accessory foramina/notches for SON and STN were found in 36.36% and 4.54% of the specimen, respectively. SON and STN remained lateral in the majority while GON ran medially to corresponding vessels. Conclusion: These parameters on the Indian population would give a comprehensive idea of the distribution of these cutaneous scalp nerves and would be beneficial in the targeted and accurate deposition of local anesthetic.

Effect of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Scalp nerve block (SNB) is widely used for postoperative pain control, intraoperative hemodynamic control, and opioid-sparing in adult craniotomies. However, there are few studies of SNB in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effect of SNB on postoperative pain, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and narcotic consumption in pediatric craniotomy under general anesthesia. Methods: This trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. A total of 50 children aged between 2 and 12 years who are undergoing elective brain tumor surgery will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 0.2% ropivacaine for SNB (group SNB, intervention group, n = 25) or the same volume of saline (group Ctrl, control group, n = 25). The primary outcome was to assess the score of postoperative pain intensity at time 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using the FLACC score method. Secondary outcomes were to record intraoperative hemodynamic variables (MAP and HR) during skull-pin fixation, skin incision and end of skin closure, intraoperative total consumption of remifentanil and propofol, postoperative opioid consumption, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Fifty patients were analyzed (n = 25 in SNB group; n = 25 in control group). Compared to the control group, postoperative pain intensity was significantly relieved in the SNB group up to 8 h post-operatively. In addition, SNB provided good intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduced intraoperative overall propofol and remifentanil consumption rate, and postoperative fentanyl consumption compared to the control group. However, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between SNB and the control group. Conclusions: In pediatric craniotomies, SNB with 0.2% ropivacaine provides adequate postoperative pain control and good intraoperative hemodynamic stability during noxious events compared to the control group. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry [No: ChiCTR2100050594], Prospective registration.

Effect of Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block on the Quality of Recovery in Patients with Parkinson's Disease after Deep Brain Stimulation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) have a higher risk of postoperative pain, which will affect their postoperative quality of recovery (QoR). Scalp nerve block (SNB) and intercostal nerve block (ICNB) can alleviate postoperative pain, yet their effect on postoperative QoR in PD patients has proven to be unclear. Therefore, we have aimed to explore the effect of SNB paired with ICNB on postoperative QoR. METHODS: To explore the effect, we have designed a randomized controlled trial in which 88 patients with PD will be randomly assigned to either an SNB group or control group, receiving either SNB combined with ICNB or without before surgery. The primary outcome will be a 15-item QoR score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes will include: 15-item QoR scores at 72 h and 1 month after surgery; the numeric rating scale pain scores before discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 month after surgery; rescue analgesics; nausea and vomiting 24 h after operation and remifentanil consumption during operation; emergence agitation; the duration of anesthesia and surgery; time to respiratory recovery, time to response, and time to extubation; the PACU length of stay; as well as adverse events. Proposed protocol and conclusion: Our findings will provide a novel method for the management of recovery and acute pain after DBS in PD patients. This research was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT05353764 on 19 April 2022.

Anisocoria and mydriasis after scalp nerve block: a case report.

Strategies for the assessment of abnormal neurological findings during general anesthesia are limited. However, pupil abnormalities may represent serious neurological complications. We herein present a case of new-onset anisocoria and mydriasis that developed after scalp nerve block. The patient's signs were possibly related to increased intracranial pressure with resulting brain shift that ultimately affected the oculomotor nerves. A 45-year-old man was scheduled for left cerebellar tumor resection and ventricular drainage surgery; however, anisocoria and left pupillary mydriasis were observed after induction of general anesthesia and performance of scalp nerve block. After reducing the intracranial pressure, the right pupil showed constriction (1 mm) but the left pupil was dilated (5 mm). The pupils were of similar size postoperatively. Although pupillary dilation during general anesthesia has been previously described, this is the first case in which the mydriasis was considered to have been caused by brain shift due to increased intracranial pressure after scalp nerve block. Thus, we propose this phenomenon as a new possible cause of pupillary changes. Actively monitoring this presentation intraoperatively could enable early detection of and intervention for complications, therefore improving the prognosis.

Monitored Anesthetic Care Combined with Scalp Nerve Block in Awake Craniotomy: An Effective Attempt at Enhanced Recovery After Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery has been attempted in neurosurgery at a greater rate. However, concern exists regarding the feasibility of using enhanced recovery after neurosurgery (ERANS). How to manage available resources to safely perform ERANS and improve clinical outcomes has been the subject of much debate and discussion. METHODS: Owing to the paucity of data available on the use of ERANS protocols, we performed the present feasibility study. We studied the outcomes of the protocols used within a tertiary referral neurosurgery center. Data from patients who had undergone awake craniotomy within an ERANS protocol were prospectively recorded in our institution from September 2017 to December 2018. We also evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the novel ERANS protocol. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (mean age, 49.5 ± 17.8 years) were included in the present study. Intraoperative hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia were present in 4 (20%), 1 (5%), and 1 (5%) patient, respectively. The postoperative morbidities included epilepsy in 1 (5%), pain in 3 (15%), and nausea or vomiting in 2 (10%). No significant changes had occurred in the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, blood glucose, or lactic acid level throughout the procedure. The median length of intensive care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay were 1 and 9.5 days, respectively. No 30-day readmissions or reoperations occurred during the present study. CONCLUSIONS: Applying an ERANS protocol was feasible, associated with a low incidence of complications, and acceptable intensive care unit and postoperative hospital lengths of stay. The findings from the present study might provide a new approach for the further research of ERANS.

Postoperative analgesia of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine in pediatric craniotomy patients: a protocol for a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe postoperative pain following craniotomy has a high incidence in pediatric patients. Such pain may cause agitation, intracranial hypertension, epileptic seizures, and postoperative hematoma, which affect morbidity and mortality. Although scalp nerve block (SNB) achieves satisfactory pain relief except for suboccipital mid-craniotomy in adults and ropivacaine is widely used as a long-acting peripheral nerve block agent in children, there are few studies of SNB with ropivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. In addition, the neurosurgery operation time is relatively long, but the duration of action of SNB is limited. It is generally believed that postoperative SNB is better than preoperative SNB for postoperative analgesia. However, considering the concept of preemptive analgesia, we believe that preoperative SNB may achieve a longer postoperative analgesia effect than we expected. METHODS: This trial is a single-institution, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. A total of 180 children aged between 1 and 12 years who are undergoing elective craniotomy will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to three groups: group B (preoperative ropivacaine block group), group A (postoperative ropivacaine block group), and group N (nonblocking control group). This randomization will be stratified by age in two strata (1-6 years and 7-12 years). The primary outcome is the total consumption of sufentanil within 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes include assessment of pain scores, total consumption of sufentanil and emergency-remedy medicine consumption at observation points, the occurrence of postoperative complications, and the length of hospitalization after surgery. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to explore the effect and feasibility of SNB with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. Further aims are to compare the effects of preoperative and postoperative SNB on postoperative analgesia in order to identify whether there is a preemptive analgesic effect and determine the better time to implement SNB in pediatric patients during craniotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017386. Registered on 27 July 2018.

A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of scalp nerve block (SNB) and local anesthetic infiltration (LA) with 0.75% ropivacaine on postoperative inflammatory response, intraoperative hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing craniotomy. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were admitted for elective craniotomy for surgical clipping of a cerebral aneurysm. They were randomly divided into three groups: Group S (SNB with 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine), group I (LA with 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine) and group C (that only received routine intravenous analgesia). Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in plasma for 72 h postoperatively, hemodynamic response to skin incision, and postoperative pain intensity were measured. RESULTS: The SNB with 0.75% ropivacaine not only decreased IL-6 levels in plasma 6 h after craniotomy but also decreased plasma CRP levels and increased plasma IL-10 levels 12 and 24 h after surgery compared to LA and routine analgesia. There were significant increases in mean arterial pressure 2 and 5 mins after the incision and during dura opening in Groups I and C compared with Group S. Group S had lower postoperative pain intensity, longer duration before the first dose of oxycodone, less consumption of oxycodone and lower incidence of PONV through 48 h postoperatively than Groups I and C. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SNB attenuated inflammatory response to craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms, blunted the hemodynamic response to scalp incision, and controlled postoperative pain better than LA or routine analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03073889 (PI:Xi Yang; date of registration:08/03/2017).

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic Agent in Scalp Block and Scalp Infiltration to Control Postcraniotomy Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

CONTEXT: Scalp infiltration and scalp block are being used to manage postcraniotomy pain. Dexmedetomidine has been successfully used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia. The study was intended to compare whether addition of dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of analgesia as well as to compare the two techniques. AIMS: The primary objective was to assess whether addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolonged the duration of analgesia. The secondary objective was to compare between scalp nerve block and scalp infiltration as techniques for pain relief. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The randomized control study was conducted in a tertiary care center from November 2013 to October 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-II patients, aged 18-70 years undergoing elective craniotomy were included. Patients were randomized into three groups of 50 patients, i.e., Group BI (bupivacaine infiltration), Group BDI (bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine infiltration), and Group BDNB (bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine scalp nerve block). Patient's pain score, pain-free interval, rescue analgesic requirement, and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were noted for 48 h. Patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months to assess postcraniotomy pain. RESULTS: Pain-free period was significantly longer in Group BDNB than Groups BDI and BI (P < 0.0001) and pain control was better in dexmedetomidine containing groups than in bupivacaine group (BI) (P < 0.0001). The rescue analgesic requirement was significantly lower in Group BDNB and Group BDI compared to Group BI. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) to bupivacaine prolonged the pain-free period. Scalp nerve block is a superior technique than scalp infiltration.

Anaesthetic management for awake craniotomy in brain glioma resection: initial experience in Military Hospital Mohamed V of Rabat.

The awake brain surgery is an innovative approach in the treatment of tumors in the functional areas of the brain. There are various anesthetic techniques for awake craniotomy (AC), including asleep-awake-asleep technique, monitored anesthesia care, and the recent introduced awake-awake-awake method. We describe our first experience with anesthetic management for awake craniotomy, which was a combination of these techniques with scalp nerve block, and propofol/rémifentanil target controlled infusion. A 28-year-oldmale underwent an awake craniotomy for brain glioma resection. The scalp nerve block was performed and a low sedative state was maintained until removal of bone flap. During brain glioma resection, the patient awake state was maintained without any complications. Once, the tumorectomy was completed, the level of anesthesia was deepened and a laryngeal mask airway was inserted. A well psychological preparation, a reasonable choice of anesthetic techniques and agents, and continuous team communication were some of the key challenges for successful outcome in our patient.

Clinical Application of Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Sevoflurane in Craniotomy / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To explore the application efficacy of scalp nerve block combined with sevoflurane in craniotomy.Methods Fifty-five patients undergoing craniotomy in pingdingshan second people's hospital of henan province from Mar 2013 to Mar 2015 were randomly divided into observation group (n =28) and control group (n =27).The scalp nerve block combined with sevoflurane was performed in observation group and the sevoflurane intravenous inhalational combined with sufentanil was performed in control group.The changes of MAP and HR were observed before induction,5min after induction,skin incision,break the meninges,operation end and 5rmin after catheter removal.The agitation scale after operation,anesthesia duration,awaking time and dosage of sufentanil were compared.Restults MAP and HR at skin incision,break the meninges,operation end and 5min after catheter removal in control group were significantly increased than those before operation,and significantly higher than those in observation group at same stage of operation,with statistically significance differences (P ＜0.05).The agitation scale of observation group was lower than that of control group,with statistically significance difference (P ＜0.05).There was no significance difference between two groups in anesthesia duration (P＞0.05),the awaking time in observation group was significantly shorter than that in control group and the dosage of sufentanil was significantly reduced in observation group (P＜0.05).Corclusion Scalp nerve block combined with sevoflurane used in craniotomy has advantages in stable vital signs,rapid awaking,less dosage of sufentanil and lower score of agitation,which is suitable for clinical application.

Effect of scalp nerve blocks on post-craniotomy pain in the patients undergoing craniotomy

BACKGROUND: Sympathetic stimulation associated with post-craniotomy pain might subsequently increase blood pressure resulting in postoperative complications. We studied whether scalp nerve blocks would reduce the severity of postoperative pain. METHODS: Thirty-two patients undergoing craniotomy were randomly allocated to either the ropivacaine group (n = 16) or the saline group (n = 16). After the skin closure, we carried out scalp nerve blocks with ropivacaine (0.75%) or saline (0.9%). Visual analog scale scores (VAS), mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after extubation. Tramadol 50 mg iv was used as rescue analgesic. The delay before administration of the first analgesic and cumulative dose of rescue analgesic for the first 48 h postoperatively were measured. RESULTS: The ropivacaine group had lower analgesic requirements than the saline group (P = 0.008). The delay before administration of the first analgesic was not different significantly between two groups. VAS was similar between the two groups at each time interval. Postoperative MAP and HR were not significantly different between two groups. VAS did not correlate with these hemodynamic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although scalp nerve blocks with ropivacaine reduced the analgesic requirement, they did not provide the sufficient pain relief.

The role of group III metabotropic receptors on opioid tolerance

BACKGROUND: Prolonged exposure to morphine causes tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception, yet the mechanisms of such tolerance are not fully understood. Although group I and II metabolic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in the modulation of morphine tolerance, the role of the group III mGluRs has not been determined. Therefore, we examined the effect of a group III mGluRs agonist on the morphine tolerance in the spinal cord. METHODS: An intrathecal infusion of morphine (40 nmol/microl/h) for 5 days was done to examine the development of morphine tolerance in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Noxious radiant heat was applied to the hindpaw and we measured the thermal withdrawal latency. To clarify the role of the group III mGluRs, an intrathecal group III mGluRs agonist (ACPT-III) or saline was administered to the morphine tolerant rats and we observed the change of the thermal withdrawal latency at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after delivery of ACPT-III. RESULTS: A continuous intrathecal infusion of morphine significantly increased the thermal withdrawal latency, as compared with the saline infused rats on day 1, with a decline on day 3 and the increase of withdrawal latency totally disappeared on day 5 (tolerance). Intrathecal ACPT-III increased the thermal withdrawal latency in the morphine tolerance rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the group III mGluRs may be involved in the suppression of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception at the spinal level.