ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hip fractures in older people result in increased mortality. OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated an accurate and simple prognostic scoring system for hip fractures that can be used preoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Multicenter. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥65 years with hip fractures who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled. METHODS: The significant factors were determined with logistic regression analysis, and a scoring system was developed. The patients were classified into three groups, and a log-rank test was performed to evaluate 1-year survival rates. The model was internally and externally validated using the 5-fold cross-validation and data from another hospital, respectively. RESULTS: We included 1026 patients. The analysis revealed eight significant prognostic factors: sex, body mass index, history of chronic heart failure and malignancy, activities of daily living (ADLs) before injury, hemoglobin and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) at injury, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) after internal validation was 0.853. The external validation data consisted of 110 patients. The AUC of the model for the validation data was 0.905, showing outstanding discrimination. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.7% vs. 100% and 93.3% vs. 95.2% for the development and validation data, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated an accurate and simple prognostic scoring system for hip fractures using only preoperative factors. Our findings highlight PNI as an important predictor of prognosis in hip fracture patients.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Humans , Hip Fractures/mortality , Hip Fractures/surgery , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Activities of Daily Living , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Age FactorsABSTRACT
Background: The rising incidence of drug abuse among pregnant women has rendered neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome a significant global health concern. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Elton B. Stephens. Company (EBSCO), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang were searched for comparative studies of the Eat, Sleep, Console model vs. traditional assessment tools for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Two reviewers conducted literature searches, screened according to the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and independently verified accuracy. All meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager Version 5.4. Results: In total, 18 studies involving 4,639 neonates were included in the meta-analysis. The Eat, Sleep, Console model demonstrated superior outcomes in assessing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, significantly reducing the need for pharmacological treatment [risk ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.34-0.56, P < 0.001], decreasing the length of hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = -2.10, 95% CI = -3.43 to -0.78, P = 0.002], and shortening the duration of opioid treatment (SMD = -1.33, 95% CI = -2.22 to -0.45, P = 0.003) compared to the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System. Conclusions: The Eat, Sleep, Console model is more effective than the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System in improving the assessment and management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Introduction A high-risk pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. Women with high-risk pregnancies are at a greater risk of developing antepartum haemorrhage, miscarriages, and the need for surgical interventions. Neonatal complications include preterm births, low birth weight (LBW), intra-uterine deaths and an increased need for NICU admission. The utilisation of low-cost scoring tools for identifying high-risk women can aid in early diagnosis and timely implementation of therapeutic interventions. Objective The retrospective record-based study sought to calculate the proportion of high-risk pregnancies using modified Coopland's scoring system and compare the maternal and foetal outcomes among high-risk pregnancies. Methods The study retrospectively analysed the records of antenatal women in their third trimester from the years December 2018 to December 2021. Each record was then numerically assessed according to the modified Coopland's scoring system and categorised according to the risk status. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were then compared across the risk groups. Results The data included 300 cases over a three-year period. According to modified Coopland's scoring system, we found that the overall proportion of high-risk pregnancies was 18.3%. Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were increased in high-risk pregnancy groups when compared to low-risk pregnancies, miscarriages (31.6% vs 15.8%) and antepartum haemorrhage (55.6% vs 11.1%). Babies born to high-risk mothers had a higher chance of developing LBW status (52.0%) and respiratory distress (45.5%) when compared to those born to low-risk mothers: 8.0% and 13.6%, respectively. Conclusion A notable portion of pregnant women were classified as high-risk using modified Coopland's scoring tool and would benefit from targeted obstetric care.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate preoperative prognostic factors available for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and propose a new preoperative prognostic scoring system for ICC that combines CA19-9 and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 1728 patients diagnosed with ICC and undergoing curative liver resections were studied. This study employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression to find factors affecting recurrence and overall survival (OS), and furthermore assessed how preoperative models influenced tumor traits and postoperative recurrence. RESULTS: The results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that two preoperative variables, NLR and Ca19-9, were independent risk factors affecting postoperative recurrence and OS in ICC patients. Based on this data, assigning a score of 0 (NLR ≤ 2.4 and Ca19-9 ≤ 37U/ml) or 1 (NLR > 2.4 and Ca19-9 > 37U/ml) to these two factors, a preoperative prognostic score was derived. According to the scoring model, patients were divided into three groups: 0 points (low-risk group), 1 point (intermediate-risk group), and 2 points (high-risk group). The 5-year recurrence and OS rates for the three groups were 56.6%, 68.2%, 77.8%, and 56.8%, 40.6%, 27.6%, respectively, with all P values < 0.001. Furthermore, high-risk group patients were more prone to early recurrence (early recurrence rates for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups were 56.8%, 51.5%, and 37.1%, respectively, P < 0.001) and extrahepatic metastasis (extrahepatic metastasis rates for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups were 31.7%, 26.4%, and 15.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). In terms of tumor characteristics, high-risk group patients had larger tumor diameters and were more likely to experience microvascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and perineural invasion. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive capacity of postoperative recurrence and OS rates in ICC patients is effectively captured by the preoperative scoring system incorporating NLR and CA19-9 levels.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , CA-19-9 Antigen , Cholangiocarcinoma , Hepatectomy , Lymphocytes , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neutrophils , Humans , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Cholangiocarcinoma/blood , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Male , Female , Neutrophils/pathology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Duct Neoplasms/blood , Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Lymphocytes/pathology , CA-19-9 Antigen/blood , Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Adult , Preoperative Period , Lymphocyte Count , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Unlike other sports, the relationship between performance deficits and pain/injury in lacrosse players has not been well-investigated. Purpose: The purposes of this study were to: 1) determine whether age and sex differences exist in dynamic physical function tests and drop jump performance among lacrosse players, and 2) determine whether pre-seasonal physical function scores predict onset of either lower extremity or low back pain over time. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: Lacrosse players (N=128) were stratified into three groups: 12-14.9 yrs, 15-18 yrs and >18 yrs. Thomas test (hip flexibility), Ober's test (iliotibial band tightness), and Ely's test (rectus femoris tightness) were performed. Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores were collected while players performed drop jumps. Sagittal and frontal plane movement from 2D video during single and double legged squats was assessed. Musculoskeletal pain symptoms or injury were tracked for six months. Age bracket, sex and physical function scores were entered into logistic regression models to determine risk factors that predicted onset of lower extremity pain and low back pain onset. Results: LESS scores and single-leg squat movement quality test scores were lowest in the 12-14.9 yr groups and highest in the >18 yr group (all p<0.05). Single leg squat performance score increased the odds risk (OR) for lower extremity pain (OR=2.62 [95% CI 1.06-6.48], p=.038) and LESS scores elevated risk for low back pain onset over six months (OR = 2.09 [95% CI 1.07- 4.06], p= .031). Conclusions: LESS scores and single legged squat performance may help identify lacrosse players at risk for musculoskeletal pain or injury onset. Detecting these pertinent biomechanical errors and subsequently developing proper training programs could help prevent lower extremity and low back pain onset. Level of Evidence: III.
ABSTRACT
Background: A landing error scoring system (LESS) is widely used to evaluate landing maneuvers. Poor landing maneuvers, such as lateral bending of the trunk, are thought to be associated with a risk of lower-extremity injury. However, no studies have examined the association between landing and trunk muscle function, which is associated with a high risk of lower-extremity injury. Hypothesis/Purpose: This study examined whether an association exists between landing movements and a high risk of lower-extremity injury and trunk muscle function. It was hypothesized that athletes with poor activation of deep trunk muscle (transversus abdominis and internal oblique) would have lower LESS scores. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The trunk muscle thickness at rest and during the plank was measured using ultrasonography. The percent of change in muscle thickness (during plank/at rest) was calculated. The LESS was measured using the Physimax. Based on the LESS scores, patients were divided into high- (LESS > 6) and low-risk (5 > LESS) groups for lower extremity injury. The relationship between the high-risk group and trunk muscle thickness was examined using a stepwise regression analysis. Results: The high-risk group had significantly lower muscle thicknesses of the transversus abdominis (p=0.02) and transversus abdominis plus internal oblique abdominis (p=0.03) muscles during the plank. Additionally, the high-risk group showed significantly lower percent of change in muscle thickness of the internal oblique (p=0.02) and transversus abdominis plus internal oblique (p=0.01) muscles. Only the percentage of change in the thickness of the internal oblique and transverse abdominal muscles was extracted from the regression as a factor. Conclusion: The findings indicated that athletes with landing movements and a high risk of injury, as determined based on the LESS results, had low trunk muscle function, and a relationship was observed between the change in thickness of transversus abdominis and internal oblique abdominis muscles. Level of Evidence: 3B.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We aim to validate the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) score compared to previous prognostic scoring systems in spinal metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2022. The survival prediction was compared between the GSTSG, Tomita Score, Revised Tokuhashi Score, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) Nomogram. Single-variable factors associated with survival rate were analyzed using univariate Cox regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Receiver operating characteristic was used for external validity analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The overall survival rate was reported using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. RESULTS: 248 spinal metastasis patients were included. The mean age was 59.23 ± 12.55 years. The mean duration of follow-up time was 470.29 ± 441.98 days. The external validity of GSTSG was the highest at all follow-up times (sufficiently accurate AUC > 0.7), which was about the same as SORG at 3 months (both AUC of GSTSG and SORG = 0.76) and higher than modified Tokuhashi and Tomita score at 12 months (AUC of GSTSG = 0.78, SORG = 0.71, Tomita = 0.64, and modified Tokuhashi = 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: From our study, the Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicates that the significant factors related to survival rate are regular analgesic use of weak opioids, lung metastasis, and previous chemotherapy. Compared to other traditional spinal metastases prognostic scoring systems, GSTSG shows the highest AUC for external validity in all follow-up times up to 24 months.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Several scoring systems are used to predict prognosis in acute pancreatitis (AP), but their predictive success varies. This study compares the validity of the commonly used Bedside Index of Severity in AP (BISAP) score with the newly developed WL score and the Chinese Simple Scoring System (CSSS) score in predicting mortality and unfavorable prognostic outcomes in AP patients. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included all AP patients presenting to the emergency department from June 2, 2019, to June 2, 2022. Patient demographics, vital signs, laboratory values, and imaging findings were recorded, and WL, CSSS, and BISAP scores were calculated. The effectiveness of these scores in predicting adverse outcomes and mortality was compared. RESULTS: Among 357 patients, 53.2% were male, with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range: 48-75). Area under the curve (AUC) values for 7-day outcomes were 0.956 for WL, 0.759 for CSSS, and 0.871 for BISAP; for 30-day outcomes, AUC values were 0.941 for WL, 0.823 for CSSS, and 0.901 for BISAP; and for poor prognostic outcomes, AUC values were 0.792 for WL, 0.769 for CSSS, and 0.731 for BISAP. CONCLUSION: In AP patients, WL, CSSS, and BISAP scores are effective predictors of unfavorable prognosis and mortality. WL score outperforms the CSSS and BISAP scores in predicting 7-day and 30-day mortality and poor prognosis. After WL, BISAP is the second-best system for predicting mortality. For predicting unfavorable prognoses, CSSS is the second-best system after WL. The simplicity of calculating the WL score based on four laboratory parameters makes it a preferable choice.
ABSTRACT
Maternal behaviour is important for lamb survival, as ewes perform many behaviours that affect the chances of a lamb surviving. Collecting maternal behaviour data directly at lambing is time-consuming and not considered suitable for acquiring the large volumes of data that would be required for using as selection criteria within commercial breeding flocks. The aim of this study was to investigate if a simple scoring system is heritable and assesses the expression of behaviours that reduce the probability of lamb mortality. Ewe behaviour was scored on a 3-point Maternal Assistance Score (MAS): (1) the ewe shows a high level of maternal interest (assumed if no intervention required); (2) the ewe shows limited interest in her lamb; and (3) the ewe shows no interest in her lamb. A total of 19 453 MAS were collected over 12 years, across 24 farms (including both indoor and outdoor lambing systems) and 12 different breed lines that make up the Innovis breeding programme. Ewe parity, breed, number of lambs carried, flock, lambing batch, lambing day within flock and pre-mating weight all had a significant effect on MAS (P < 0.05). The maternal assistance score was shown to be heritable (h2 = 0.05) and repeatable (0.10), positively genetically correlated to lambing difficulty (rg = 0.29) and amount of assistance the lamb required to suckle from the ewe (rg = 0.88), and negatively genetically correlated with the number of lambs successfully reared (rg = 0.49). This study shows that an easy-to-measure score can be used by shepherds with large breeding flocks, based on whether the ewe requires further assistance to support her lamb rearing. The score could be used in breeding programmes to select for lamb rearing ability in the future and potentially lead to an improvement in lamb welfare through a reduction in mortality.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The POSSUM scoring system, widely employed in assessing surgical risks, offers a simplified and objective approach for the prediction of complications and mortality in patient. Despite its effectiveness in various surgical fields, including orthopedics and cardiovascular surgery, yet its utilization in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery is infrequent. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly with colorectal cancer. METHODS: 306 elderly colorectal cancer patients were grouped according to the complications and death within 30 days after surgery. Among them, 108 cases in complication group, 198 cases in non-complication group, 16 cases in death group and 290 cases in survival group. POSSUM scores of all subjects were obtained and its predictive value for postoperative complications and mortality of elderly was conducted by ROC curve. RESULTS: No apparent difference were observed in complications and mortality among patients with different disease types, operation types and operation timing (P> 0.05). The R2 in complication group was higher than non-complication group (P< 0.05). The R1 in death group were higher than survival group (P< 0.05). The AUC of R2 for predicting postoperative complications was 0.955 with a sensitivity of 88.89% and a specificity of 94.44% and the AUC of R1 for evaluating postoperative mortality of elderly with colorectal cancer was 0.783 with a sensitivity of 56.25% and a specificity of 82.93%. CONCLUSION: POSSUM score system has a certain predictive value for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly with colorectal cancer. However, the predicted mortality rate is higher than actual mortality rate.
ABSTRACT
Pharyngitis can be caused by various pathogens, including viruses and bacteria. Group A streptococcus (GAS) is the most common bacterial cause of pharyngitis. However, distinguishing GAS pharyngitis from other types of upper respiratory tract infections is challenging in clinical settings. This often leads to empirical treatments and, consequently, the overuse of antimicrobial drugs. With the advancement of antimicrobial drug management and healthcare payment reform initiatives in China, reducing unnecessary testing and prescriptions of antimicrobial drugs is imperative. To promote standardized diagnosis and treatment of GAS pharyngitis, this article reviews various international guidelines on the clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis, particularly focusing on clinical scoring systems guiding laboratory testing and antimicrobial treatment decisions for GAS pharyngitis and their application recommendations, providing a reference for domestic researchers and clinical practitioners.
Subject(s)
Pharyngitis , Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcus pyogenes , Humans , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Pharyngitis/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a movement analysis tool proposed to identify the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, very useful for injury prevention. The aim of this study is to review the variants of the LESS, their normative scores and the differences according to sex and sport practiced. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases were searched from inception to October 19, 2023. Studies were eligible if the objective was finding normative or reference scores for the LESS, analyze the differences between sexes or sports, or used some variant of the test. Results were limited to available full-text articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Of the 360 articles identified, 20 were included for a full analysis (18,093 participants, age = 8-30 years, males = 70.6%). The military population was the most frequently analyzed (7 studies, n = 16,603). Results showed six variants of the LESS and average values ranged from 2.56 to 7.1. Males and females showed different pattern landing with errors in different planes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for more field studies on LESS reference scores, particularly for females and basketball or hockey players. Further research is required before conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Humans , Female , Male , Sex Factors , Reference Values , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Basketball/injuries , Adolescent , Movement , Adult , Child , Hockey/injuries , Sports , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The quality of life of elderly patients after vertebroplasty is influenced by various factors. Although the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) scale has been widely used to assess quality of life, the factors affecting the long-term postoperative quality of life of elderly vertebroplasty patients in China have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: This retrospective study included 519 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent elective vertebroplasty. We collected baseline data from these patients and conducted telephone follow-ups 12 months postoperation to evaluate their EQ-5D-3L health utility scores and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) scores. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to analyse the factors affecting quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 519 patients, the majority were female (78.0%), aged 65 to 95 years, with an average age of 75.2 years. Twelve months postoperation, pain/discomfort was the most commonly reported issue for 68.4% of patients. The median EQ-5D-3L health utility score was 0.783, with a range between 0.450 and 0.887; the median EQ-VAS score was 75, ranging from 60 to 85. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that older age, hormone use, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades, nondrinking habits, and low albumin levels were found to be independent risk factors affecting long-term quality of life in elderly patients after vertebroplasty. Additionally, a history of tumours, the number of vertebral compression fractures, and bone mineral density were also crucial influencing factors. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the use of the EQ-5D-3L Chinese utility scoring system, we evaluated the quality of life of patients aged 65 and above 12 months after vertebroplasty. This study identified several factors related to postoperative quality of life in elderly vertebroplasty patients, providing crucial evidence for further clinical decisions and patient education.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Vertebroplasty , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Vertebroplasty/methods , Aged, 80 and over , China/epidemiology , Time Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fractures/psychology , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic irradiation has become the mainstay treatment for brain metastases (BM), and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is often used for symptom palliation. However, the survival time of patients with BM undergoing palliative WBRT (pWBRT) is limited, making it difficult to select patients who should receive treatment. METHODS: We collected patient data from 2016 to 2022 at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and retrospectively analyzed the factors related to survival time. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the survival time after WBRT. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients (median age, 66 years) who underwent pWBRT were included. The primary cancers were lung, breast, gastrointestinal tract, and other cancers in 203 (67%), 38 (13%), 33 (11%), and 27 (9%) patients, respectively. Median OS of all patients was 4.1 months. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio [HR]:1.4), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≤ 60 (HR:1.7), presence of extracranial metastasis (ECM) (HR:1.6), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 5 (HR:1.6), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) (HR:1.3) were significantly associated with shorter OS (all P < 0.05). To predict the OS, we created a prognostic scoring system (PSS). We gave one point to each independent prognostic factor. Median OS for patients with scores of 0-2, 3, and 4-5 were 9.0, 3.5 and 1.7 months, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, KPS ≤ 60, presence of ECM, NLR ≥ 5, and LDH ≥ ULN were poor prognostic factors for patients with BM undergoing pWBRT. By PSS combining these factors, it may be possible to select patients who should undergo pWBRT.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Cranial Irradiation , Palliative Care , Radiosurgery , Humans , Male , Female , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Palliative Care/methods , Prognosis , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Adult , Karnofsky Performance StatusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel scoring system based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting the difficulty of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 637 patients with uterine fibroids were enrolled. Sonication time, non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR), and ultrasound energy delivered for ablating 1 mm3 of fibroid tissue volume (E/V) were each classified as three levels and assigned scores from 0 to 2, respectively. Treatment difficulty level was then assessed by adding up the scores of sonication time, NPVR and E/V for each patient. The patients with score lower than 3 were categorized into low difficulty group, with score equal to or greater than 3 were categorized into high difficulty group. The potential predictors for treatment difficulty were compared between the two groups. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis model was created by analyzing the variables. The difficulty score system was developed using the beta coefficients of the logistic model. RESULTS: Signal intensity on T2WI, fibroid location index, largest diameter of fibroids, abdominal wall thickness, homogeneity of the signal of fibroids, and uterine position were independent influencing factors for the difficulty of USgHIFU for uterine fibroids. A prediction equation was obtained: difficulty score = 17 × uterine position (anteverted =0, retroverted =1)+71 × signal intensity (hypointense = 0, isointense/hyperintense = 1) +8 × enhancement (homogenous = 0, heterogeneous = 1)+25×(largest diameter of fibroids-20) +35 × (fibroid location index -0.2) +1×(abdominal wall thickness -5). CONCLUSIONS: This scoring system established based on MRI findings can be used to reliably predict the difficulty level of USgHIFU treatment of uterine fibroids.
Subject(s)
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation , Leiomyoma , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Female , Leiomyoma/diagnostic imaging , Leiomyoma/surgery , Leiomyoma/therapy , Leiomyoma/pathology , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases is guideline-recommended therapy. However, Japanese Clinical Oncology Group 0504 study showed that postoperative observation could be a therapeutic option in patients with completed resected brain metastases. We hereby investigated the incidence and risk factors for local recurrence after complete resection without immediate radiotherapy and developed a scoring system for its prediction. METHODS: We included 53 patients with 54 brain metastases, who underwent complete resection between January 2016 and December 2021. We identified risk factors for local recurrence and developed a scoring system to predict it using the extracted risk factors, by assigning one point to each risk factor and calculating the total scores for each patient. We evaluated the correlation between the prognostic score and time to local recurrence. RESULTS: Local recurrence occurred in 37 of 54 tumors (68.5%), with a median follow-up duration of 21.0 months. The median time to local recurrence was 5.1 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were identified as risk factors for local recurrence (non-lung adenocarcinoma, p = 0.035; infratentorial tumors, p = 0.044; and no postoperative systemic therapy, p = 0.0069). A score ≥ 2 showed a median time to local recurrence of 2.1 months, starkly contrasting with 30.8 months for a score ≤ 1 (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were risk factors for local recurrence. Our scoring system can predict local recurrence, thus potentially aiding treatment decisions.
ABSTRACT
We developed a scoring system for assessing glaucoma risk using demographic and laboratory factors by employing a no-code approach (automated coding) using ChatGPT-4. Comprehensive health checkup data were collected from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Using ChatGPT-4, logistic regression was conducted to predict glaucoma without coding or manual numerical processes, and the scoring system was developed based on the odds ratios (ORs). ChatGPT-4 also facilitated the no-code creation of an easy-to-use risk calculator for glaucoma. The ORs for the high-risk groups were calculated to measure performance. ChatGPT-4 automatically developed a scoring system based on demographic and laboratory factors, and successfully implemented a risk calculator tool. The predictive ability of the scoring system was comparable to that of traditional machine learning approaches. For high-risk groups with 1-2, 3-4, and 5 + points, the calculated ORs for glaucoma were 1.87, 2.72, and 15.36 in the validation set, respectively, compared with the group with 0 or fewer points. This study presented a novel no-code approach for developing a glaucoma risk assessment tool using ChatGPT-4, highlighting its potential for democratizing advanced predictive analytics, making them readily available for clinical use in glaucoma detection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endoscopy-based scoring systems, including Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score (MMES), and Degree of Ulcerative Colitis Burden of Luminal Inflammation (DUBLIN) Score, have been introduced to evaluate UC prognosis. This study aims to compare their predictive capacity for clinical outcomes in UC patients. METHODS: Consecutive UC patients from a tertiary hospital were included. The primary outcome was acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), and secondary outcomes were UC-related admission, medication treatment escalation, disease extension and surgery. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Among 300 patients, 15.3% developed ASUC. Robust correlations were observed among the three scoring systems and were with elevated serum inflammatory markers. The DUBLIN score exhibited superior predictive ability for UC-related admission (AUC 0.751; 95%CI 0.698-0.799) and medication treatment escalation (AUC 0.735; 95% CI 0.681-0.784). No statistical differences were found among three scoring systems for predicting ASUC, disease extension, and surgery. Employing respective cut-offs of 2, 11.25, and 3, higher MES (HR = 3.859, 95% CI 1.636-9.107, p = 0.002), MMES (HR = 3.352, 95% CI 1.879-5.980, p < 0.001), and DUBLIN score (HR = 5.619, 95% CI 2.378-13.277, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of developing ASUC. CONCLUSION: The DUBLIN score, assessing the overall inflammatory burden of the intestinal tract, outperforms the MMES in predicting admission and medication treatment escalation related to UC. Its integration into clinical practice has the potential to enhance risk stratification for patients with UC.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Factors impacting the rate of aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion (FD) have been well described in the literature. In this article, we sought to evaluate those variables to develop and validate a scoring system predicting aneurysm incomplete occlusion after FD. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FD at a single institution between March 2013 and March 2023. Multivariable logistic regression model was developed using factors associated with aneurysm incomplete occlusion. The ABC scoring system consisted of: Age (<60 years old: 0, 60-69 years: 1, 70-79: 2, and ≥80: 3), Branch coming out of the aneurysm dome/neck (yes: 2, no: 0), and Cigarette smoking history (never smoker: 1, current or past smoker: 0). The scoring system performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve. RESULTS: A total of 449 patients with 563 aneurysms treated in 482 procedures were evaluated. Most cases were females (81.7%) with a median age of 59 years old. At a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 84.0% of aneurysms were completely or near-complete occluded. The scoring system had an area under the curve of 0.71. A value ≥ 2, reached a sensitivity of 74.4%, a specificity of 60.9%, a likelihood ratio+ of 1.90, and proved to be reliable in predicting the risk of incomplete occlusion (odds ratio = 4.53; 95% confidence interval: 2.73-7.54; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ABC scoring system can be used to evaluate the risk of aneurysm incomplete occlusion after treatment with FD, identifying patients who would benefit from adjunctive coiling or alternative treatment modalities.