Effect of transbronchial or intravenous administration of indocyanine green on resection margins during near-infrared-guided segmentectomy: a review.

For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection remains the best treatment option. Currently, sublobar resection, including segmentectomy, is recommended in these cases, as it provides a better quality of life with the same oncological outcomes; however, is requires adequate resection margins. Accurate preoperative planning and proper identification of the intersegmental planes during thoracic surgery are crucial for ensuring precise surgical management and adequate resection margins. Three dimensional computed tomography reconstruction and near-infrared-guided intersegmental plane identification can greatly facilitate the surgical procedures. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction can simulate both the resection and resection margins. Indocyanine green is one of the most frequently used and affordable fluorophores. There are two ways to identify the intersegmental planes using indocyanine green: intravenous and transbronchial administration. Intravenous application is simple; however, its effectiveness may be affected by underlying lung disease, and it requires the isolation of segmental structures before administration. Transbronchial use requires appropriate bronchoscopic skills and preoperative planning; however, it also allows for delineation deep in the parenchyma and can be used for complex segmentectomies. Both methods can be used to ensure adequate resection margins and, therefore, achieve the correct oncological radicality of the surgical procedure. Here, we summarise these applications and provide an overview of their different possibilities.

Trends and Comparative Outcomes Between Operative Approaches for Segmentectomy in Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Segmentectomy is increasingly performed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparative outcomes data between open, robotic-assisted (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) approaches are limited. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of NSCLC segmentectomy cases (2013-2021) from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was performed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared by operative approach. Volume trends, outcomes, and nodal upstaging were assessed. RESULTS: Of 9,927 segmentectomy patients, 84.8% underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with RATS becoming the most common approach in 2019. Open segmentectomy is more likely performed at low-volume centers (p<0.0001), whereas RATS more likely high-volume centers (p<0.0001). VATS had higher open conversion rate than RATS (OR 11.8, CI [7.01-21.6], p<0.001). MIS had less 30-day morbidity compared to open segmentectomy (VATS OR 0.71 95% CI [0.55-0.94], p=0.013; RATS OR 0.59, CI [0.43-0.81], p=0.001). Number of nodes and stations harvested were highest for RATS, however N1 upstaging was more likely in open compared to RATS (OR 0.63, CI 0.45-0.89, p< 0.007) and VATS (OR 0.61, CI 0.46-0.83, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy volume has increased considerably with RATS becoming the most common approach. MIS has less major morbidity compared to open segmentectomy with no difference between VATS and RATS. However, risk of open conversion is higher with VATS. RATS had increased nodal harvest whereas hilar nodal upstaging was highest with thoracotomy. This study reveals significant differences in outcomes exist between segmentectomy operative approach; the impact of approach on survival merits further investigation.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Overview, Indications, and Techniques.

Twenty years have passed since uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was first reported. Several reports have already proven the minimal invasiveness of uniportal VATS. In addition, two large clinical trials recently demonstrated the benefits of segmentectomy for small peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Uniportal VATS segmentectomy is considered the most beneficial minimally invasive surgery for patients with early-stage lung cancer. However, a high level of skill and experience are required to achieve this goal. Only a few reports have discussed specific techniques, particularly for complex segmentectomies. In this Special Issue, we reviewed previous reports on uniportal VATS segmentectomy regarding the indications, instrument selection, marking of the tumor location, methods of intersegmental plane identification, and lymph node dissection, including our own techniques with video content.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term oncological outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy are unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the long-term prognosis and to evaluate risk factors for recurrence after segmentectomy. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2012, a total of 177 patients underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. The median follow-up period was 120.1 months. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant factors that predicted recurrence. RESULTS: The study included 177 patients with a median age of 67 years. The median operative time was 155 min. No 30-day deaths were observed. Nine patients (5.1%) had recurrences: loco-regional in 3, distant in 3 and both in 3. The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.7% and 79.8%, and the OS rates were 90.9% and 80.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the risk factor associated with recurrence was a pure solid tumour [hazard ratio, 23.151; 95% confidence interval 2.575-208.178; P = 0.005]. The non-pure solid tumour group had a significantly better probability of survival (5-year OS: 95.4% vs 77.2%; 10-year OS: 86.5% vs 61.8%; P < 0.0001). A total of 113 patients received preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Patients with a higher maximum standardized uptake value had a significantly higher recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer produced acceptable long-term outcomes. Pure solid radiographic appearance was associated with recurrence and decreased survival.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for ground-glass opacity dominant cT1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1211 suggested that segmentectomy should be considered as standard treatment for clinical T1N0 (cT1N0) ground glass opacity (GGO). However, over half of patients in JCOG1211 had pre-/minimal invasive adenocarcinoma. This study aims to retrospectively investigate the long-term survival of GGO featured cT1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy. Methods: This study screened patients with primary cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma who received segmentectomy or lobectomy from 2010-2020. Prior computed tomography (CT) scans before surgery of all patients were reviewed and the inclusion was confirmed according to tumor diameter and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR). GGO nodules between 2-3 cm with CTR ≤0.5 or ≤2 cm with CTR between 0.25-0.5 were finally included. Patients with pathologically diagnosed pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma were excluded. Long-term survivals between segmentectomy group and lobectomy group were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). Recurrence and postoperative complication events were also analyzed. Results: In total, 617 patients were enrolled, 159 received segmentectomy and 458 received lobectomy. Clinicopathological characteristics were well distributed between two groups. With a median follow-up time of 61.1 months (IQR: 42.3-71.7 months), after PSM, the 5-year overall survival rate was 98.8% (97.9-99.6%) for lobectomy and 99.3% (98.2-99.8%) for segmentectomy (P=0.42), the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 95.3% (92.2-97.6%) for lobectomy and 95.2% for segmentectomy (92.3-98.7%) (P=0.81). The proportion of recurrence was 4.1% for lobectomy and 4.4% for segmentectomy (P=0.89). The proportion of grade 2 and above early postoperative complications was 9.6% for lobectomy and 8.8% for segmentectomy (P=0.86). Conclusions: For cT1N0 GGO featured invasive lung adenocarcinoma (2 cm < tumor diameter ≤3 cm, CTR ≤0.5 or tumor diameter ≤2 cm, 0.25< CTR ≤0.5), postoperative outcomes between segmentectomy group and lobectomy group were comparable. Concerning minimally invasive surgical strategy, segmentectomy should be confirmed as the standard surgical approach.

Single-Session Ablative Transarterial Radioembolization for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Streamline Care: An Initial Experience.

PURPOSE: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is performed after a mapping angiogram involving infusion of radiolabeled macroaggregated albumin to assess for non-target embolization and pulmonary shunting. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-session TARE without the initial procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution case series of 16 consecutive procedures on 15 patients with 18 tumors who underwent an attempted single-session TARE procedures with glass microspheres are presented. A lung shunt fraction (LSF) of 5% was assumed for planning purposes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (10/15) of patients were male with a median age of 72 years. Median tumor size was 2.5 cm (IQR 2.0-3.2 cm). Sixteen of the 18 targeted tumors were untreated prior to the single-session TARE. Rate of technical success was 88% (14/16). Two patients did not ultimately receive a single-session TARE due to intraprocedural findings. The mean administered activity was 2.0 GBq, and the mean MIRD dose was 464 Gy based on pre-treatment anatomic imaging and 800 Gy based on cone-beam CT. There were no cases of radiation pneumonitis. Mean post-procedural calculated lung dose was 4.9 Gy (range 3.1-9.3) based on SPECT. CONCLUSIONS: An initial experience with single-session TARE using Y-90 glass microspheres without pre-procedural mapping angiography and lung shunt estimation demonstrates that it is a feasible and safe treatment option for select patients with small (< 5 cm) HCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Level 4 case series.

An analysis of residual lung volume changes after segmentectomy based on three-dimensional computed tomography.

Background: Based on the results of JCOG0802 and CALGB studies, segmentectomy has considered to be a standard procedure for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After lobectomy, the residual cavity is filled with mediastinal and diaphragmatic deviations, and compensatory volume changes are present in the residual lungs. In this study, we examined the efficacy of segmentectomy, a surgical procedure, by focusing on its impact on postoperative lung volume and function. Methods: We enrolled 77 patients who underwent segmentectomy as their initial surgical procedure, excluding those with additional lung resections and those who lacked postoperative computed tomography imaging. The predicted residual volume (mL) was defined as the total lung volume before surgery minus the volume of the resected area. Using the predicted residual volume (mL) and postoperative total lung volume (mL), we calculated the rate of postoperative lung volume increase [(postoperative total lung volume/predicted residual volume) × 100] (%). We also classified 52 cases with a rate of postoperative lung volume increase of ≥100% into a compensatory group, while those with a rate of <100% were classified into a non-compensatory group. Results: The average postoperative lung volume increase was 104.6% among 77 cases. Age ≥65 years, pack year index ≥27.5, ≥3 resected segments, and use of electrocautery for intersegmental plane division were significantly associated with compensatory group classification. In 20 compensatory cases with preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, postoperative vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second values exceeded the preoperative predictions. This study further examined the areas responsible for postoperative compensatory lung volume increase. In the compensatory group, significant expansion was observed in the ipsilateral lobes, excluding the resected segment and contralateral lung, while no significant changes were noted in the volume of the lobe, including the resected segment. Conversely, the non-compensatory group showed a significant volume decrease in the resected lobe, but no significant increase in other areas. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of preserving lung segments in segmentectomy. The study demonstrates extensive compensatory volume changes in the ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung. There was no significant volume decrease in any residual segment. This underlines the potential of segmentectomy to maintain lung function and expand treatment options post-surgery. In addition, the compensated group included patients with a lower pack-year index and younger patients. These results suggest that postoperative compensatory lung expansion includes not only hyperinflation of the remaining lung, but also an increase in the functional lung parenchyma.

Survival and pulmonary function in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after sublobar resection versus lobectomy: An updated meta-analysis.

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Sublobar resection is considered a standard surgical procedure for early non-small cell lung cancer, although the survival of patients undergoing sublobar resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to compare survival between segmentectomy and wedge resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone curative surgery for cT1cN0M0 stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 91 patients who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (42.9%) and 52 patients (57.1%) were included in the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% confidence interval 4.2 - - years) (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The 5 year overall survival rates were not significantly different between the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups (67.7% vs 52.0%, P = 0.132). The 5 year recurrence-free survival rate was worse in the wedge resection group than in the segmentectomy group (66.6% vs 46.9%, P = 0.047). In univariable analysis, spread through air spaces (hazard ratio, 5.889; 95% confidence interval, 2.357-14.715; P < 0.001) was an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in the wedge resection group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall survival of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent wedge resection. However, patients with cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent wedge resection tended to have a worse recurrence-free survival prognosis than those who underwent segmentectomy.

Advantages of laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver using ICG fluorescent navigation by the negative staining method: A comparison with open procedure.

Aim: Laparoscopic segmentectomy (LS) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation with negative staining method has potential for performing accurate and safe anatomical excision. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of LS using ICG fluorescence navigation compared with open segmentectomy (OS). Methods: Eighty-seven patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomies were evaluated for OS (n = 44) and LS (n = 43). The Glissonean pedicle approach was performed using either extra- or intrahepatic method, depending on the location of segment in LS. After clamping pedicle, negative staining method was performed. Liver transection was done along intersegmental plane visualizing by overlay mode of ICG camera. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups. Correlation between predicted resecting liver volume (PRLV) calculated using volumetry and actual resected liver volume (ARLV) was assessed in two groups. Results: Patients who underwent LS showed better outcomes in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. There were significantly fewer Grade II and Grade III or higher postoperative complications in LS group. Both values of AST (p < 0.001) and ALT (p < 0.001) on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in LS group than in OS group. PRLV and ARLV were more strongly correlated in LS (r = 0.896) than in OS (r = 0.773). The difference between PRLV and ARLV was significantly lower in LS group than in OS group (p = 0.022), and this trend was particularly noticeable in posterosuperior segment (p = 0.008) than in anterolateral segment (p = 0.811). Conclusion: LS using ICG navigation allows precise resection and may contribute to safer short-term outcomes than OS, particularly in posterosuperior segment.

Feasibility and Comparative Prognosis of Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy in Centrally Located Small and Solid Dominant cN0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of segmentectomy in patients with central, whole tumor size ≤2 cm and radiologically solid-dominant cN0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1240 patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for small and radiologically solid-dominant cN0 NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed centrally located tumors defined as tumors located in the inner two-thirds of the pulmonary parenchyma. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 299 eligible patients, no significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed between the segmentectomy (n = 121) and lobectomy (n = 178) groups (P = .794 and .577, respectively). After propensity score matching, no significant differences in hilar and mediastinal lymph node upstaging were found among the 93 matched patients (P = 1.00) and locoregional recurrence was comparable between those who underwent segmentectomy (n = 4) and lobectomy (n = 4). RFS and OS did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = .700 and .870, respectively). Propensity score-adjusted multivariable Cox analysis for RFS and OS indicated that segmentectomy was not an independent prognostic factor (RFS: hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.85; P = .755; OS: hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.14; P = .860). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy may be a viable treatment option with local control and prognosis comparable to that of lobectomy in appropriately selected patients with central, small (≤2 cm), and radiologically solid-dominant NSCLC.

Clinically important pulmonary vascular variations: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Pulmonary vascular variations are a major factor in thoracic surgeries. Minimally invasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) used in non-small lung cancer treatment, have a limited field of view and no haptic feedback. Additionally, new studies suggest that segmentectomies are beneficial for patients. Accurate knowledge of vascular patterns and variants is crucial for conducting such procedures safely. The aim of this review was to systematize data in a useful manner from studies and case reports concerning pulmonary vascular variations and patterns. Methods: We conducted a search on the PubMed and Embase databases. We used classifications of Nagashima, Yamashita, Boyden, Maciejewski, and Shimizu. Key Content and Findings: The analysis showed that more data on the incidence rate and vascular patterns of certain bronchopulmonary segments are needed. Venous variations are a major factor in segmental resections, but additional data regarding incidence and pattern types are needed. Surgeons need to be aware of vascular variations as they can influence procedures in seemingly unrelated areas. The majority of studies emphasize the use of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) for accurate planning of any thoracic procedures. Conclusions: Abnormal vessels pose a risk in various procedures performed within the thorax, and the data in this review could be valuable in different medical areas in this regard.

Application of microwave surgical instrument to lung segmentectomy for small-sized lung cancer.

Objectives: For lung segmentectomy of small lung cancers, we used a microwave surgical instrument for lung parenchymal dissection mainly at the pulmonary hilum, which is difficult to handle with surgical staplers. This technique facilitated the insertion of staples. Methods: In total, 116 patients with cStage 0-1A3 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung segmentectomy were included in this study. We compared the perioperative factors of the group in which a microwave surgical instrument was used for dissection procedures, including lung parenchymal dissection at the pulmonary hilum, and peripheral intersegmental dissection was performed with surgical staplers (group M+S: N = 69), with those of the group in which parenchymal dissection was performed mainly with surgical staplers without using the microwave surgical instrument (group S: N = 47). Results: Although more complex segmentectomies were performed in the M+S group (P = .001), the number of staple cartridges (7 staple cartridges vs 8 staple cartridges, P = .005), the surgical times (179 vs 221 minutes, P < .0001), and the blood loss (5 mL vs 30 mL, P = .012) were significantly lower in the M+S group. The duration of chest tube placement was significantly shorter in the M+S group (P = .019), and postoperative complications of grade 2 or greater were significantly lower in the M+S group (P = .049). Conclusions: The effective use of the microwave surgical instrument combined with surgical staplers can simplify pulmonary hilar and intersegmental plane dissections not only for simple segmentectomy but also for complex segmentectomy, leading to favorable intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.