Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Ergon ; 111: 104047, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207522

ABSTRACT

To enhance the take-over performance by human drivers of Level-2 automated vehicles (AV), we developed a design concept that presents the AV's planned trajectory as augmented reality in the windshield. We hypothesized that, even when the AV does not release a take-over request before a potential crash (i.e., silent failure), the planned trajectory would allow the driver to foresee the crash and enhance the take-over performance. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a driving-simulator experiment where participants monitored the driving status of an AV with or without the planned trajectory in the context of silent failures. The results showed that, when the planned trajectory was projected in the windshield as if it were an augmented-reality display, the crash rate decreased by 10% and the take-over response time decreased by 825 ms compared to when the planned trajectory was not provided.


Subject(s)
Augmented Reality , Automobile Driving , Humans , Autonomous Vehicles , Automation , Reaction Time/physiology , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control
2.
Hum Factors ; 65(2): 288-305, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33908795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of silent and alerted failures on driver performance across two levels of scenario criticality during automated vehicle transitions of control. BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of automated vehicle crashes show that many crashes occur after a transition of control or a silent automation failure. A substantial amount of research has been dedicated to investigating the impact of various factors on drivers' responses, but silent failures and their interactions with scenario criticality are understudied. METHOD: A driving simulator study was conducted comparing scenario criticality, alert presence, and two driving scenarios. Bayesian regression models and Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate the impact of alert and scenario criticality on takeover performance. RESULTS: The results show that silent failures increase takeover times and the intensity of posttakeover maximum accelerations and decrease the posttakeover minimum time-to-collision. While the predicted average impact of silent failures on takeover time was practically low, the effects on minimum time-to-collision and maximum accelerations were safety-significant. The analysis of posttakeover control interaction effects shows that the effect of alert presence differs by the scenario criticality. CONCLUSION: Although the impact of the absence of an alert on takeover performance was less than that of scenario criticality, silent failures seem to play a substantial role-by leading to an unsafe maneuver-in critical automated vehicle takeovers. APPLICATION: Understanding the implications of silent failure on driver's takeover performance can benefit the assessment of automated vehicles' safety and provide guidance for fail-safe system designs.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Autonomous Vehicles , Humans , Bayes Theorem , Regression Analysis , Automation , Accidents, Traffic , Reaction Time/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL