A comparative analysis of sivelestat sodium hydrate and ulinastatin combination therapy in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This comparative analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of Sivelestat Sodium Hydrate (SSH) combined with Ulinastatin (UTI) in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A control group and an observation group were formed with eighty-four cases of patients with sepsis with ARDS, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was intravenously injected with UTI based on conventional treatment, and the observation group was injected with SSH based on the control group. Both groups were treated continuously for 7 days, and the treatment outcomes and efficacy of both groups were observed. The Murray Lung Injury Score (MLIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were compared. Changes in respiratory function, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress indicators were assessed. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions was recorded. RESULTS: The total effective rate in the observation group (95.24%) was higher than that in the control group (80.95%) (P < 0.05). The mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization time, and duration of antimicrobial medication in the observation group were shorter and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome incidence was lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The mortality rate of patients in the observation group (35.71%) was lower than that in the control group (52.38%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). MLIS, SOFA, and APACHE II scores in the observation group were lower than the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, respiratory function, inflammation, and oxidative stress were improved in the observation group (P < 0.05). Adverse reactions were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of SSH plus UTI improves lung injury and pulmonary ventilation function, and reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with sepsis and ARDS.

Efficacy Analysis and Prognostic Impact of Sivelestat Sodium in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sivelestat sodium on mortality, oxygenation index, and serum markers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult inpatients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The study compared clinical characteristics, laboratory indices, and mortality rates between patients treated with and without sivelestat sodium. Cox regression analysis was employed to assess the effect of sivelestat sodium on the risk of death, oxygenation index, and improvement of serum markers in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were included, with 45 patients in the sivelestat group and 65 patients in the control group. The overall patient mortality rate was 69.1%, with 62.2% in the sivelestat group and 73.8% in the control group. After five days of treatment, the median change from baseline in the oxygenation index was 21 mmHg in the medicated group and -31 mmHg in the control group (p < 0.05). Analysis of the oxygenation index as a clinical endpoint event showed a significantly higher rate of improvement in the sivelestat group compared to the control group (57.8% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.05), and the odds of raising the oxygenation index after treatment were 2.05 times higher in the sivelestat group than in the control group (HR = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.02-4.15, p < 0.05). Among patients with a baseline oxygenation index < 200 mmHg, patients in the sivelestat group had an 86% lower risk of death compared to the control group (HR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.02-0.81, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sivelestat sodium demonstrated a significant improvement in the oxygenation index of patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS and was found to considerably reduce the risk of death in patients with a baseline oxygenation index of <200 mmHg.

[A case of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by inhalation of hydrogen chloride].

Poisoning induced by inhalation of hydrogen chloride has significant effects on the respiratory system. It can cause severe pulmonary edema and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the early stage, and even death in critical cases. As a novel treatment for ARDS, the efficacy of sivelestat sodium in infection-induced ARDS has been widely verified, but its application in ARDS caused by chemical poisoning is still scarce in literature. Here we report a case of ARDS induced by hydrogen chloride inhalation which was successfully treated with sivelestat sodium and conventional treatment.

[Sivelestat sodium for treatment of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective cohort study].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of sivelestat sodium on survival, oxygenation index, and serum markers for infection in critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This retrospectively study was performed among the critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) at Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. We collected the clinical data of the patients on the first day of ICU admission and on the day of discharge and laboratory tests results of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) and oxygenation index on days 1, 3 and 7 following ICU admission. Propensity-score matching was used to match the patients receiving sivelestat sodium to those without the treatment. Cox proportional hazards model and linear regression analysis were used to assess the association of sivelestat sodium treatment with in-hospital mortality and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS patients were included for data analysis. After propensity-score matching PSM, 35 patients receiving sivelestat sodium were matched to 70 patients without the treatment. Treatment with of sivelestat sodium was not associated with the reduction of in- hospital mortality (P=0.36), prolonged ICU stay (P=0.39), hospital stay (P=0.68) or improved oxygenation index (P>0.05) of the patients. No significant difference was found in serum CRP or PCT levels between the patients with and without sivelestat sodium treatment, but a significant reduction in IL-6 level was found in sivelestat sodium group (P=0.016). CONCLUSION: Sivelestat sodium treatment is not correlated with the reduction of mortality or length of hospital stay, but is associated with reduced serum IL-6 level in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS.

Treatment with sivelestat sodium of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by chemical pneumonitis: A report of three cases.

Inhalation of acid fumes and aspiration of liquid substances or gastric contents may not initiate dyspnea within several hours after exposure but may result in delayed onset of alveolar edema. The present report presents three cases of inhalation or aspiration of chemical substances that resulted in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Due to different underlying reasons, three patients developed ARDS resulting from chemical pneumonitis and pulmonary infection. From patients with dyspnea, dry rales could be heard in both lungs, with <92% percutaneous oxygen saturation at room air. All patients were treated using a high-flow nasal cannula and sivelestat sodium. Oxygenation gradually improved and the patients were discharged without adverse events. These cases suggest that early treatment with sivelestat sodium may improve the clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS.

Sivelestat sodium alleviated lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by improving endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common inflammatory respiratory disorder characterized by a high incidence and mortality rate. This study aimed to investigate the potential therapeutic effects of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor Sivelestat sodium (SIV) in improving endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) while treating lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI. An ALI model was established using LPS induction. The effects of SIV on ALI were observed both in vivo and in vitro, along with its impact on ERS. Lung tissue damage was assessed using Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. Lung edema was measured by the lung wet/dry weight ratio. The expression levels of protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK), Phospho-protein kinase R-like ER kinase (p-PERK), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (EIF2a), phosphorylated α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (P-EIF2a), and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) were analyzed by Western blotting in vivo and in vitro. The levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in Lung tissue samples supernatants were measured by ELISA. Oxidative stress markers were measured by ELISA. Apoptosis was measured using the TUNEL assay. Apoptosis-associated proteins B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)、Bcl2-associated × (Bax)、caspase-3 were evaluated through Western blotting in vivo and in vitro. The expression levels of ERS-related proteins, including p-PERK, ATF4, P-EIF2a, and CHOP, were significantly increased in the LPS-induced ALI model. However, SIV markedly reduced the expression levels of these proteins, suppressing the LPS-induced ERS response. Further investigations revealed that SIV exerted a protective effect on ALI by alleviating lung tissue damage and apoptosis, improving lung function, and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress levels. However, when SIV was co-administered with Tunicamycin (TUN), TUN blocked the beneficial effects of SIV on ERS and reversed the protective effects of SIV on ALI. In conclusion, SIV alleviated lung tissue damage and apoptosis, improving lung function, and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress in LPS-induced ALI by improving ERS.

Efficacy and safety of sivelestat sodium in patients with sepsis / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of sivelestat sodium in patients with sepsis.Methods:The clinical data of 141 adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the sivelestat sodium group ( n = 70) and the control group ( n = 71) according to whether they received sivelestat sodium or not. The efficacy indexes included oxygenation index, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count (WBC), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) before and after 7 days of treatment, as well as ventilator supporting time, the length of ICU stay, the length of hospital stay and ICU mortality. The safety indicators included platelet count (PLT) and liver and kidney function. Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, underlying diseases, infection site, basic drugs, etiology, oxygenation index, biochemical indexes, SOFA and APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the oxygenation index in 7 days was significantly increased [mmHg (1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 233.5 (181.0, 278.0) vs. 202.0 (153.0, 243.0), P < 0.01], the levels of PCT, CRP, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and APACHE Ⅱ score were significantly decreased in the sivelestat sodium group [PCT (μg/L): 0.87 (0.41, 1.61) vs. 1.53 (0.56, 5.33), CRP (mg/L): 64.12 (19.61, 150.86) vs. 107.20 (50.30, 173.00), ALT (U/L): 25.0 (15.0, 43.0) vs. 31.0 (20.0, 65.0), APACHE Ⅱ: 14 (11, 18) vs. 16 (13, 21), all P < 0.05]. However, there were no significant differences in SOFA, WBC, serum creatinine (SCr), PLT, total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in 7 days between the sivelestat sodium group and the control group [SOFA: 6.5 (5.0, 10.0) vs. 7.0 (5.0, 10.0), WBC (×10 9/L): 10.5 (8.2, 14.7) vs. 10.5 (7.2, 15.2), SCr (μmol/L): 76.0 (50.0, 124.1) vs. 84.0 (59.0, 129.0), PLT (×10 9/L): 127.5 (59.8, 212.3) vs. 121.0 (55.0, 211.0), TBil (μmol/L): 16.8 (10.0, 32.1) vs. 16.6 (8.4, 26.9), AST (U/L): 31.5 (22.0, 62.3) vs. 37.0 (24.0, 63.0), all P > 0.05]. The ventilator supporting time and the length of ICU stay in the sivelestat sodium group were significantly shorter than those in control group [ventilator supporting time (hours): 147.50 (86.83, 220.00) vs. 182.00 (100.00, 360.00), the length of ICU stay (days): 12.5 (9.0, 18.3) vs. 16.0 (11.0, 23.0), both P < 0.05]. However, there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay and ICU mortality between the sivelestat sodium group and the control group [the length of hospital stay (days): 20.0 (11.0, 27.3) vs. 13.0 (11.0, 21.0), ICU mortality: 17.1% (12/70) vs. 14.1% (10/71), both P > 0.05]. Conclusions:Sivelestat sodium is safe and effective in patients with sepsis. It can improve the oxygenation index and APACHE Ⅱ score, reduce the levels of PCT and CRP, shorten ventilator supporting time and the length of ICU stay. No adverse reactions such as liver and kidney function injury and platelet abnormality are observed.

Myocardial protective effect of sivelestat sodium in rat models with sepsis-induced myocarditis.

Background: The incidence of sepsis has been steadily increasing worldwide, and the heart is one of the target organs that can be easily damaged by sepsis. At present, antibiotics and organ function support are the main treatment options for sepsis and multiple system organ dysfunction, but are still under investigation. Methods: Fifty rats were randomly divided into the sham operation group, sepsis group, sivelestat sodium low-dose (L) group (administered with sivelestat sodium 1.6 mg/kg), sivelestat sodium middle-dose (M) group (administered with sivelestat sodium 4.8 mg/kg), and sivelestat sodium high-dose (H) group (administered with sivelestat sodium 10 mg/kg). Morphological changes of myocardial cells and the distribution of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 proteins were observed by light microscope. Serum troponin-T, creatine kinase isoenzyme MB, brain natriuretic peptide, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and IL-1ß levels and changes in cardiac function indicators were measured. The protein expressions of Bax, Bcl-2, and ERK1/2 were detected by Western blotting. Results: Compared with the sham operation group, the release of inflammatory factors in the sepsis group increased; the protein expressions of Bax, Bcl-2, and ERK1/2 increased; left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and maximum rate of LVP rise (+dp/dtmax) level decreased, whereas -dp/dtmax increased. In the sivelestat sodium groups, the release of inflammatory factors decreased; Bax expression decreased, whereas Bcl-2 and ERK1/2 protein expressions increased; LVSP, LVEDP, and +dp/dtmax increased, whereas -dp/dtmax decreased. In addition, all of these changes occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions: Sivelestat sodium can effectively lower the expressions of inflammatory factors and improve cardiac function. It can act on the ERK1/2 signaling pathway to exert its cardiomyocyte-protective effect, and the activation of this signaling pathway can offer potential treatment sites for septic myocarditis.

Efficacy and safety of sivelestat sodium for the treatment of inflammatory response in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) via cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are strongly associated with mortality. Although the sivelestat sodium has been approved for the treatment of patients with acute lung injury, there is currently no enough evidence for improving inflammatory response and reducing the associated mortality. Our study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sivelestat sodium for the treatment of inflammatory response in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods: A total of 71 ATAAD patients who received surgical treatment at our center from January 2021 to December 2021 retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the sivelestat sodium group and the control group. Clinical information including the postoperative oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), white blood cell (WBC) count, procalcitonin (PCT) level, interleukin-6 (IL-6) level, duration of ventilator use (hours), intensive care unit stay (days), and 28-day mortality rate, were collected. The statistical inference differences between the groups were compared using the non-paired Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi squared test and repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: There were no significant differences between the sivelestat sodium group and the control group in terms of baseline characteristics (all P>0.05). The mortality rate was decreased in the sivelestat sodium group than the control group (10% vs. 13.73%). The subgroup analysis showed that for patients with a mechanical ventilation duration >96 h, the 48-h oxygenation index (149±53 vs. 260±66, P=0.001), and the 72-h oxygenation index (165±66 vs. 288±95, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the control group than the sivelestat sodium group. And the postoperative WBC count (P=0.015) and PCT level (P=0.033) were significantly lower in the sivelestat sodium group than the control group in post-operative day 4. Conclusions: Sivelestat sodium can improves the postoperative oxygenation index and inflammatory response for ATAAD patients requiring mechanical ventilation for extended periods.

Comparative study of the protective effect of Xuebijing injection and Sivelestat sodium on acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome rats / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective:To compare the protective effect of Xuebijing injection versus Sivelestat sodium on acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) rats.Methods:A total of 71 male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into the blank control group ( n = 8), ALI/ARDS model group ( n = 21), Xuebijing injection group ( n = 21) and Sivelestat sodium group ( n = 21). Rats in the blank control group were injected with normal saline while the other three groups were intravenously injected 25 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via the tail vein to establish ALI/ARDS model. After induction of ALI/ARDS model, the blank control group and ALI/ARDS model group were given intraperitoneal injection of an equal volume of normal saline twice a day. Rats in the Xuebijing injection group were given tail vein injection of 8 mL/kg Xuebijing injection twice a day, and those in the Sivelestat sodium group were given intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg Sivelestat sodium three times a day. All rats were administered continuously for five days. During the experiment, the general status of rats was observed, and the weight and survival were recorded. At the end of the experiment, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of rats was collected for the detection of inflammatory cells and inflammatory factors. Histopathological changes of rats lung tissue were observed. Results:Compared with the ALI/ARDS model group, the Xuebijing injection group and Sivelestat sodium group had significantly decreased white blood cell (WBC) count and percent of neutrophil (NEU%) [WBC (×10 9/L): 55.86±6.68, 49.96±6.76 vs. 73.13±7.35, NEU%: 0.459±0.077, 0.315±0.047 vs. 0.709±0.067, all P < 0.05], significantly increased percent of lymphocytes (LYM%: 0.412±0.067, 0.517±0.051 vs. 0.232±0.057, both P < 0.05), and reduced interleukin-6 (IL-6) level (ng/L: 295.2±39.7, 281.9±33.1 vs. 469.6±77.0) in BALF. However, there were no significant differences in these parameters between the Xuebijing injection group and Sivelestat sodium injection group (all P > 0.05). Survival rate at the end of experiment was higher in the Xuebijing group than that in the Sivelestat sodium injection group and ALI/ARDS model group [52.4% (11/21) vs. 28.6% (6/21), 14.3% (3/21)], and survival rate at the end of experiment was higher in the Sivelestat sodium injection group than that in the ALI/ARDS model group, but the differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). In addition, weight and weight growth rate in the Xuebijing injection group were higher than the Sivelestat sodium group at the end of the experiment [weight (g): 217.1±6.4 vs. 207.1±7.0, weight growth rate: (-0.9±2.8)% vs. (-4.3±3.5)%], there were no significant difference between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Lung histopathology in the ALI/ARDS model group revealed high level of inflammatory exudate and inflammatory cells infiltrated in the alveoli of rats, along with damage of local alveolar epithelial cell and alveolar structure. However, these histological changes were improved in the Xuebijing injection group and in the Sivelestat sodium group. Conclusions:Xuebijing injection can alleviate ALI/ARDS-induced lung injury and systemic damage and improve the survival of rats by inhibiting inflammation. The protective effect of Xuebijing injection is essentially consistent with that of Sivelestat sodium.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of sivelestat sodium in the treatment of septic acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most organ dysfunctions in sepsis. Although the development of therapeutic strategies such as protective mechanical ventilation technology has improved the mortality of ARDS patients, there is currently no effective drug for reducing the associated mortality. Our study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of sivelestat sodium in patients with septic ARDS, for providing the basis on clinical use of this drug. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 140 patients with septic ARDS. Clinical information including general conditions, mechanical ventilation time, drug cost parameters, and adverse reactions. The partial pressure of O2/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score (APACHE II score) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA score) are for assessing the severity illness. To evaluate the efficacy of sivelestat sodium on septic ARDS patients by comparing length of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, cost of hospitalization and mortality between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of organ failure, biochemical data, blood gas analysis, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II score), and SOFA score between the two groups on the day of admission. The PaO2/FiO2, APACHE II score, and SOFA score of the sivelestat sodium group were significantly better than in the control group (P<0.05). The length of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU hospitalization, and cost of ICU hospitalization were all lower in the sivelestat sodium group (P<0.05). No adverse events were reported during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Sivelestat sodium significantly improves the oxygenation in patients with septic ARDS, together with reducing mechanical ventilation, ICU hospitalization, and medical costs.

A Multidrug Therapy for Hydrocarbon Aspiration With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Exposure to Oral Benzine Intake: A Case Report.

Oral benzine intake with suicidal tendencies is an uncommon life-threatening respiratory emergency without a treatment regimen.  A 50-year-old man attempted suicide with 100 ml of oral benzine intake and developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with hydrocarbon aspiration. He received mechanical ventilation with placement in the prone position and low tidal volume, neuromuscular blocking agents, bronchoalveolar lavage, steroid pulse therapy, antibiotics, and sivelestat sodium hydrate. He was transferred to the psychiatric hospital five days after admission without any adverse events. ARDS associated with oral benzine intake could be treated with general treatments for ARDS.

Evaluation of appropriate indications for the use of sivelestat sodium in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Sivelestat sodium, a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor, is the only commercially available, specific therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, its clinical efficacy is controversial. We aimed to evaluate appropriate indications for its use in ARDS. METHODS: We studied 66 patients with ARDS who were treated with sivelestat sodium. They were divided into survivors (n = 37) or non-survivors (n = 29) at 60 days, and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients' backgrounds evaluated with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were significantly different between both groups (survivors versus non-survivors: APACHE II score, 14.7 ± 6.7 versus 20.5 ± 4.7, P < 0.01; SOFA, 7.25 ± 2.5 versus 9.82 ± 3.5, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other patients' characteristics. On receiver operator characteristic analysis of APACHE II scores before the use of sivelestat sodium, the estimated cut-off value for survival was calculated to be 18.5.On receiver operator characteristic analysis of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio, the area under the curve was the highest 3 days after the treatment, with the optimal cut-off point at 198. CONCLUSION: An APACHE II score ≤18, and a PaO2/FIO2 ratio >198 at 3 days after the use of sivelestat sodium predicted a good outcome.

Suppressive effects of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat sodium hydrate on interleukin-1ß production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated porcine whole blood.

OBJECTIVE: Sivelestat sodium hydrate (Siv) is expected to be an effective therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome, although its mechanism of action is not understood. In this study, we investigated which myeloid cells-derived cytokines were suppressed by Siv. METHODS: Continuous hemofiltration was performed by circulating fresh porcine blood through a semi-closed circuit. To ensure that leukocytes survived for 360 min, 5% glucose, heparin, and air were continuously injected. The control group received continuous administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) only, whereas the Siv group received LPS and Siv. Complete blood count, levels of various cytokines, and other variables were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Interleukin (IL)-1ß level was significantly suppressed in the Siv group compared with that in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that Siv suppressed the production of IL-1ß and possibly other cytokines by myeloid cells. Whether this suppression of cytokine production is caused directly by Siv or mediated via suppression of granulocyte elastase should be evaluated in the future.

Sivelestat sodium hydrate treatment for refractory Kawasaki disease.

BACKGROUND: There is still no definite treatment for refractory Kawasaki disease (KD). In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new protocol consisting of sivelestat sodium hydrate (SSH) combined with additional i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) for KD resistant to initial IVIG therapy. METHODS: This study is a prospective non-randomized, open-label and single-arm study undertaken in a population of refractory KD patients at Chiba University Hospital from December 2006 to March 2016. The subjects had KD resistant to initial IVIG (2 g/kg) and received SSH (0.2 mg/kg/h for 5 days) combined with additional IVIG (2 g/kg) as a second-line therapy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the treatment during the study period. RESULTS: Forty-six KD patients were enrolled in this study and no serious adverse event was noted. Of these, 45 patients were evaluated for the incidence of coronary artery lesions, which occurred in one patient (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.5-15.2). Twenty-eight (62.2%) responded promptly and were afebrile after the therapy. The median total duration of fever was 8 days (range, 6-28 days). CONCLUSIONS: Additional IVIG combined with SSH as a second-line therapy for KD refractory to initial IVIG therapy was safe and well tolerated and could be a promising option for severe KD. Further investigations are expected to clarify the safety and timing of SSH treatment for KD.

Effect of sivelestat sodium in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Sivelestat is widely used in treating acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although the clinical efficacy of sivelestat remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of sivelestat in patients with ALI/ARDS. METHODS: Electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched to identify trials through April 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included irrespective of blinding or language that compared patients with and without sivelestat therapy in ALI/ARDS. A random-effects model was used to process the data, and the relative risk (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effect of sivelestat. RESULTS: Six RCTs reporting data on 804 patients with ALI/ARDS were included. Overall, no significant difference was found between sivelestat and control for the risk of 28-30 days mortality (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71-1.23; P = 0.718). Sivelestat therapy had no significant effect on ventilation days (SMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.38; P = 0.748), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) level (SMD: 0.48; 95% CI: -0.45 to 1.41; P = 0.315), and intensive care unit (ICU) stays (SMD: -9.87; 95% CI: -24.30 to 4.56; P = 0.180). The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that sivelestat therapy might affect the PaO2/FiO2 level in patients with ALI/ARDS (SMD: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.35; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sivelestat therapy might increase the PaO2/FiO2 level, while it had little or no effect on 28-30 days mortality, ventilation days, and ICU stays. These findings need to be verified in large-scale trials.

Sivelestat sodium hydrate improves post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis through nuclear factor-κB in a rat model.

As a specific inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, sivelestat sodium hydrate has primarily been used in the treatment of acute lung injury caused by various factors since its approval in 2002. Sivelestat sodium hydrate also improves post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA), although its underlying mechanisms of action have yet to be elucidated. The aim of the current study was to determine if sivelestat sodium hydrate improves post-traumatic KOA through nuclear factor (NF)-κB in a rat model. Treatment with sivelestat sodium hydrate significantly inhibited the induction of structural changes and significantly increased the vertical episode count and ipsilateral static weight bearing of the joint in KOA rats (all P<0.01). Sivelestat sodium hydrate significantly inhibited tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 production, serum nitrite levels, inducible nitric oxide synthase protein expression and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) secretion in KOA rats compared with the model group (all P<0.01). Sivelestat sodium hydrate also significantly suppressed p50/p65 DNA binding activity and NF-κB and phosphorylated inhibitor of κB protein expression in the joints of KOA rats compared with the model group (all P<0.01). These results suggest that sivelestat sodium hydrate improves post-traumatic KOA through HMGB1 and NF-κB in rats.

Research Progress of Human Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitors and Their Application in Diverse Diseases / 中国药学杂志

To comprehensively understand the research status of human neutrophil elastase inhibitors (HNEI) and their clinical application prospect, the papers about novel HNEI discovered since 2011 and diseases related to human neutrophil elastase (HNE) in addition to pulmonary diseases were summarized. The results showed that a lot of highly selective and potent HNE inhibitors have been discovered since 2011. HNE participates in the development of many diseases. In addition to the infectious and inflammatory pulmonary diseases reported in the past, it is also associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune diabetes, nephritis, cancer and other diseases. The development of novel HNEI with high potency and low toxicity has been an important direction for HNE-related diseases.

Effects of sivelestat sodium on early inflammatory reaction in rats with smoke inhalation injury / 天津医药

Objective To investigate the effects of sivelestat sodium on early inflammatory reaction in rats with smoke inhalation injury. Methods Forty SPF male SD rats were randomly divided into 5 groups:normal control group (A), injury group (B), smoke inhalation treated with 10 mg/kg sivelestat sodium group (C), smoke inhalation treated with 20 mg/kg sivelestat sodium group (D) and smoke inhalation treated with 30 mg/kg sivelestat sodium group (E), 8 rats for each group. After smoke inhalation injury model was established, the treatment groups were intraperitoneally injected sivelestat sodium 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg separately. B group was treated with the same volume of physiological saline. After 24 hours,ELISA was used for detecting serum contents of neutrophil elastase (NE), myeloperoxidase (MPO), tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in five groups. Meanwhile the water content of lung tissue was measured, and the pathological changes were observed by HE staining. The thickness of alveolar septum was measured and compared between groups. Results Compared with control group, the serum levels of NE, MPO, IL-6, TNF-α, water content of the lung tissue and thickness of alveolar septum were significantly higher in other four groups (P<0.05). Compared with injury group, the serum levels of NE, MPO, IL-6, TNF-α, water content of the lung tissue and thickness of alveolar septum were significantly lower in treatment groups (P<0.05). Compared with 20 mg/kg treatment group and 30 mg/kg treatment group, the serum levels of NE, MPO, IL-6, TNF-α, water content of the lung tissue and thickness of alveolar septum were significantly lower in 10 mg/kg treatment group (P<0.05). Conclusion The result shows that sivelestat sodium can reduce the early inflammatory reaction of rats with smoke inhalation injury and attenuates the lung edema. In this experiment, the treatment effect of 10 mg/kg sivelestat sodium is better than other treatment doses.

GAPDH/Siah1 cascade is involved in traumatic spinal cord injury and could be attenuated by sivelestat sodium.

The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)/Siah1 signaling pathway has been recognized as a sensor of nitric oxide (NO). It is associated with a variety of injurious conditions, suggesting its therapeutic potential for spinal cord injury (SCI). Sivelestat sodium (SIV), a neutrophil elastase (NE) inhibitor initially used to treat acute lung injury, has been known to protect against compression-induced and ischemic SCI. However, little is known about the relationship between the GAPDH/Siah1 cascade and SIV. Thus, we aimed to assess the role of GAPDH/Siah1 cascade in traumatic SCI and its possible link with SIV. Rats were assigned to four groups: sham group, SCI group, 5-mg/kg SIV group, and 10-mg/kg SIV. The traumatic SCI was induced by dropping a 10-g impactor from a height of 25mm on the dorsal surface of T9 and T10. SIV was injected intraperitoneally immediately after surgery. Our results showed that the nuclear translocation of GAPDH was induced together with the nuclear translocation of Siah1 and the formation of the GAPDH/Siah1 complex in the spinal cord after traumatic SCI. However, the activation of the GAPDH/Siah1 cascade was attenuated by treatment with SIV. We also found that SIV suppressed apoptosis, NE and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein expressions, the number of NE and iNOS immunostained cells, the production of interleukin (IL)-1ß and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and the activation of nuclear factor kappa light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling in the spinal cord. The behavioral tests showed that SIV promoted functional recovery after traumatic SCI as reflected in the sustained increase in the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scores throughout the observation period. In conclusion, our results reveal GAPDH/Siah1 as a novel signaling pathway during the progression of SCI, which can be blocked by SIV.