Multidisciplinary approach to anaplastic and metastatic meningioma: A case report and review of the literature.

Background: Meningiomas are slow-growing neoplasms, accounting for 20% of all primary intracranial neoplasms and 25% of all intraspinal tumors. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas are infrequent, representing fewer than 5% of all meningiomas. Unusually, they can show aggressive behavior, and extracranial metastases are extremely rare, representing approximately 0.1% of all reported cases. Case Description: Fifty-six-year-old male patient diagnosed with atypical basal frontal meningioma with multiple resections, both endoscopic endonasal and transcranial. After hypofractionated radiosurgery, the patient showed new tumor recurrence associated to right cervical level II ganglionic metastasis. We opted for complete resection of the meningioma and reconstruction with anterior rectus abdominis muscle flap, as well as selective cervical ganglionectomy. Anatomical pathology showed neoplastic proliferation of meningothelial cells in syncytial cytoplasm, oval or spherical nuclei with slight anisocariosis and hyperchromasia, and intranuclear vacuoles, all compatible with anaplastic meningioma. Conclusion: Due to a lack of consensus on how to treat a metastatic malignant meningioma, this pathology requires a multidisciplinary approach, and treatment needs to be adapted to each particular case. Complete resection of the lesion is the primary goal, and this requires complex procedures involving endocranial as well as extracranial surgeries, which result in composite defects difficult to resolve. Microvascular free flaps are considered the gold standard in reconstructions of large skull base defects, with high success rates and few complications.

Lateral nasal wall flap for endoscopic reconstruction of the skull base: anatomical study and clinical series.

BACKGROUND: The lateral nasal wall (LNW) flap provides vascularized endonasal reconstruction primarily in revision surgery. Although the harvesting technique and reconstructive surface have been reported, the arterial supply to the LNW flap and its clinical implications is not well defined. This study presents anatomical dissections to clarify the vascular supply to this flap, and the associated clinical outcomes from this reconstructive technique. METHODS: The course and branching pattern of the sphenopalatine artery (SPA) to the LNW were studied in 6 vascular latex-injected heads (11 LNW flaps total). Patients undergoing an LNW flap since 2008 were identified and the underlying pathology, indication, flap viability, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The inferior turbinate artery arises from the LNW artery and divides into 2 branches at the most posterior aspect of the inferior turbinate bone. A smaller-caliber superficial branch travels anteriorly and branches to the LNW. A larger dominant branch travels into the inferior meatus and tangentially supplies the nasal floor. Twenty-four patients with sellar or posterior cranial fossa (PCF) defects were reconstructed with an LNW flap. Postoperative contrast enhancement of the LWN flap was identified in 95.5% of cases. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were identified in 6 cases. CONCLUSION: Blood supply to the nasal floor by the dominant inferior meatus branch is more robust than the supply to the anterior LNW by the superficial arterial branch. The LNW flap is the preferred vascularized reconstructive option to the PCF and sella in the absence of a nasoseptal flap (NSF).

Perforation of a nasoseptal flap does not increase the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

BACKGROUND: The nasoseptal flap (NSF) has been shown to be a valuable addition to the reconstructive armamentarium of the endoscopic skull-base surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after use of a NSF that had a small tear during harvest. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we analyzed our database of patients undergoing skull-base resection. We included all patients who had a NSF reconstruction, septoplasty, and/or spur on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. We then evaluated video of each procedure to determine if a tear occurred in the NSF during harvest. Patient records were reviewed to determine if a postoperative CSF leak occurred. RESULTS: We evaluated video of 21 patients who underwent a skull-base resection, were reconstructed with a NSF, and had either a septoplasty or evidence of a septal spur on CT imaging. Of these 21 cases, 11 small tears occurred during harvest of the NSF flap and none of the patients with a torn NSF had a postoperative CSF leak. CONCLUSION: Our series shows a 0% postoperative CSF leak rate in patients undergoing skull-base reconstruction with a NSF that was torn during harvest. Small tears in the NSF do not seem to affect postoperative CSF leak rates.