Long-term experience with octreotide and lanreotide for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The somatostatin analogs (SSA) octreotide and lanreotide are a mainstay in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The two pivotal trials differed considerably in terms of patient characteristics and are not directly comparable. Further comparative data are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective chart review study included patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET grade 1 or 2 who were treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide autogel. The main aim was to compare the two SSA based on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from treatment start. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients were analyzed, 60% (n = 77) had a small intestinal NET and 31% (n = 40) a pancreatic NET. Histologically, 34% (n = 44) had NET G1, 55% (n = 71) a NET G2, and 11% (n = 14) a NET G1/G2 unclassified. Lanreotide was used in 90 patients (70%) and octreotide in 39 patients (30%). Overall, the median PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.0-42.9 months). No PFS difference (p = 0.8) was observed between lanreotide (29.8 months, 95% CI 18.7-48.5 months) and octreotide (36.0 months, 95% CI 23.2-68.2 months). Median OS from treatment start was calculated at 93.5 months (95% CI 71.1-132.9 months). Again, the median OS following lanreotide (113.4 months, 95% CI 62.3-NA months) or after octreotide (90.3 months, 95% CI 71.1-NA months) did not differ significantly (p > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term experience with octreotide and lanreotide in NET did not reveal differences in antitumor effectiveness. This is consistent with previous reports and might suggest that both SSA can be used interchangeably if needed.

Acromegaly Disease Control Maintained After Switching From Injected Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Paltusotine.

CONTEXT: Paltusotine is a nonpeptide selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paltusotine in the treatment of patients with acromegaly previously controlled with injected somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults with acromegaly who had insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) ≤1.0 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) while receiving a stable dose of depot octreotide or lanreotide. Patients were switched from injected SRLs and randomized to receive paltusotine or placebo orally for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN. Secondary endpoints were change in IGF-I level, change in Acromegaly Symptom Diary (ASD) score, and maintenance of mean 5-sample growth hormone (GH) <1.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was met: 83.3% (25/30) of patients receiving paltusotine and 3.6% (1/28) receiving placebo maintained IGF-I ≤1.0×ULN (odds ratio: 126.53; 95% CI: 13.73, >999.99; P<.0001). Paltusotine was also superior to placebo for all secondary endpoints: mean (±SE) change in IGF-I of 0.04±0.09×ULN versus 0.83±0.1×ULN (P<.0001); mean (±SE) change in ASD score of -0.6±1.5 versus 4.6±1.6 (P=.02); mean GH maintained at <1.0 ng/mL in 20/23 (87.0%) versus 5/18 (27.8%) patients (odds ratio: 16.61; 95% CI: 2.86, 181.36; P=.0003). The most common adverse events were acromegaly symptoms and gastrointestinal effects characteristic of SRLs. CONCLUSION: Replacement of injected SRLs by once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining both biochemical and symptom control in patients with acromegaly and was well tolerated.

Treatment of acromegaly with the nonpeptide, highly selective somatostatin receptor type 2 agonist paltusotine.

Injectable first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) are the standard of care of medical treatment for acromegaly. While fg-SRLs control acromegaly in up to 50 % of patients, they may lead to bothersome injection pain and site reactions. Paltusotine is an investigational, highly selective somatostatin receptor subtype 2 agonist, which is administered orally once a day. To date, phase 2 and 3 clinical trials suggest paltusotine treatment can achieve biochemical and symptom control in acromegaly, with a safety profile comparable to those of the fg-SRLs. Since paltusotine is a once-daily oral drug, it may represent a future treatment option for addressing patient preference or improving quality of life.

Loss of function in somatostatin receptor 5 has no impact on the growth of medaka fish due to compensation by the other paralogs.

Somatic growth in vertebrates is regulated endocrinologically by the somatotropic axis, headed by the growth hormone (GH) and the insulin growth factor-I (IGF-I). Somatostatin (Sst), a peptide hormone synthesized in the hypothalamus, modulates GH actions through its receptors (Sstr). Four Sstr subtypes (Sstr 1-3 and 5) have been identified in teleosts. However, little is known about whether they have a specific function or tissue expression. The aim of this study was to determine the role of sstr2 and sstr5 in the growth of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). The assessed expression pattern across diverse tissues highlighted greater prevalence of sstr1 and sstr3 in brain, intestine and muscle than in pituitary or liver. The expression of sstr2 was high in all the tissues tested, while sstr5 was predominantly expressed in the pituitary gland. A CRISPR/Cas9 sstr5 mutant with loss of function (sstr5-/-) was produced. Assessment of sstr5-/- indicated no significant difference with the wild type regarding growth parameters such as standard length, body depth, or peduncle depth. Furthermore, the functional loss of sstr5 had no impact on the response to a nutritional challenge. The fact that several sstr subtypes were upregulated in different tissues in sstr5-/- medaka suggests that in the mutant fish, there may be a compensatory effect on the different tissues, predominantly by sstr1 in the liver, brain and pituitary, with sstr2 being upregulated in pituitary and liver, and sstr3 only presenting differential expression in the brain. Analysis of the sstr subtype and the sstr5-/- fish showed that sstr5 was not the only somatostatin receptor responsible for Sst-mediated Gh regulation.

New Treatments for Acromegaly in Development.

Acromegaly treatment has greatly evolved in recent decades, but there are still patients whose acromegaly is not controlled with currently available treatments, and there is a need to improve the treatment burden. Fortunately, there are new treatments under development that may increase treatment efficacy and convenience.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant). AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly. EXPERT OPINION: Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

Refractory somatotroph adenomas.

Somatotroph adenomas are usually controlled with standard therapy, which can include surgery, medical treatment and radiotherapy. Some tumors have a more aggressive behavior and are refractory to standard therapy. In this review, we summarize the phenotype of these tumors and the current options for their management.

ACROBAT Edge: Safety and Efficacy of Switching Injected SRLs to Oral Paltusotine in Patients With Acromegaly.

CONTEXT: Paltusotine is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide small-molecule somatostatin receptor type 2 (SST2) agonist in clinical development for treatment of acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate change in insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels in patients switched from octreotide long-acting release or lanreotide depot monotherapy to paltusotine. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label, prospective, multicenter, multinational, nonrandomized, single-arm exploratory study was conducted in which dosage uptitrations were performed in a double-blinded manner. At 26 global sites, patients with acromegaly switched to paltusotine from injected somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)-based therapy. Patients received 13-week treatment with once-daily oral paltusotine (10-40 mg/d). The primary end point was change from baseline to week 13 in IGF-I for patients who switched from long-acting octreotide or lanreotide depot monotherapy to paltusotine (group 1). All patients underwent a 4-week paltusotine washout at end of treatment period (wk 13-17). IGF-I, growth hormone (GH), patient-reported outcome, and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients enrolled. In group 1 (n = 25), IGF-I and GH showed no significant change between SRL baseline and end of paltusotine treatment at week 13 (median change in IGF-I = -0.03×upper limit of normal [ULN]; P = .6285; GH = -0.05 ng/mL; P = .6285). IGF-I and GH rose significantly in the 4 weeks after withdrawing paltusotine (median change in IGF-I = 0.55×ULN; P < .0001 [median increase 39%]; GH = 0.72 ng/mL; P < .0001 [109.1% increase]). No patients discontinued because of adverse events (AE); no treatment-related serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: These results suggest once-daily oral paltusotine was effective in maintaining IGF-I values in patients with acromegaly who switched from injected SRLs. Paltusotine was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with other SRLs.

Survivin: A Potential Marker of Resistance to Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

CONTEXT: Invasive and somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)-resistant pituitary tumors represent a challenge in the clinical practice of endocrinologists. Efforts have been made to elucidate reliable makers for both. Survivin and eukaryotic translation initiation factor-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) are upregulated in several cancers and involved in apoptosis and cell proliferation. OBJECTIVE: We explored the role of these markers in somatotropinomas. METHODS: Immunostains for survivin and 4EBP1, and also for somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), Ki-67, and cytokeratin 18, were analyzed in tissue microarrays containing 52 somatotropinoma samples. Tumor invasiveness was evaluated in all samples while drug resistance was evaluated in 34 patients who received SRL treatment. All these parameters were correlated with first-generation SRL (fg-SRL) responsiveness and tumor invasiveness. RESULTS: Low survivin expression (P = 0.04), hyperintense signal on T2 weighted image (T2WI) (P = 0.01), younger age (P = 0.01), sparsely granular adenomas (SGA) (P = 0.04), high postoperative growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (P = 0.049 and P < 0.001, respectively), and large postoperative tumor size (P = 0.02) were associated with resistance to fg-SRL. Low survivin and SSTR2 expression and high 4EBP1 expression were associated with SGA (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.001, respectively). Younger age (P = 0.03), large tumor pre- and postoperative (P = 0.04 and P = 0.006, respectively), low SSTR2 expression (P = 0.03), and high baseline GH and IGF-1 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) were associated with tumor invasiveness. However, survivin, 4EBP1, Ki-67, and granulation patterns were not associated with tumor invasion. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that low survivin expression is predictive of resistance to fg-SRL in somatotropinomas, but not of tumor invasiveness.

Characterization of sporadic somatotropinomas with high GIP receptor expression.

PURPOSE: To analyze the expression of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) in somatotropinomas specimens and compare clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic, molecular, and pathological data among those who overexpressed (GIPR +) and those who did not overexpress (GIPR - ) GIPR. METHODS: Clinical, biochemical, radiological, molecular, and pathological data were collected. GNAS1 sequencing was performed with the Sanger method. Protein expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 and CAM 5.2 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to analyze the mRNA expression of GIPR with the TaqMan® method. Positive expression was considered when the fold change (FC) was above 17.2 (GIPR +). RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (54% female) were included. Eighteen tumors (24%) were GIPR + . Gsp mutation was detected in 30 tumors (40%). GIPR + tumors were more frequently densely granulated adenomas (83% vs 47%, p = 0.028). There was no difference in clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic (surgical cure or response to medical therapy), or other pathological features between GIPR + and GIPR -  tumors. Twenty-eight out of 56 (50%) GIPR -  tumors harbored a gsp mutation, whereas two out of 18 (11%) GIPR + tumors harbored a gsp mutation (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We described, for the first time, that GIPR + and gsp mutations are not mutually exclusive, but gsp mutations are less common in GIPR + tumors. GIPR + and GIPR -  tumors have similar clinical, biochemical, radiological, therapeutic, and pathological features, with the exception of a high frequency of densely granulated adenomas among GIPR + tumors.

MicroRNA in Acromegaly: Involvement in the Pathogenesis and in the Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

Acromegaly is a chronic and systemic disease due to excessive growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor type I caused, in the vast majority of cases, by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. About 40% of these tumors have somatic mutations in the stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit 1 gene. The pathogenesis of the remaining tumors, however, is still not fully comprehended. Surgery is the first-line therapy for these tumors, and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are the most prescribed medications in patients who are not cured by surgery. MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNAs that control the translation of many mRNAs, and are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Differentially expressed miRNAs can explain differences in the pathogenesis of acromegaly and tumor resistance. In this review, we focus on the most validated miRNAs, which are mainly involved in acromegaly's tumorigenesis and fg-SRL resistance, as well as in circulating miRNAs in acromegaly.

Innovative therapeutics in acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality that can be prevented with adequate disease control. Three modalities of treatment (surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy) are available; however, a significant proportion of patients still maintain disease activity despite treatment. Therefore, there is a need for innovations in the treatment of acromegaly that include changes in the current trial and error approach and the development of new drugs. In this review, we summarize the recent innovations in the treatment of acromegaly and address the future perspectives in this field.

Pituitary acting drugs: cabergoline and pasireotide.

First-line treatment for Cushing´s disease is transsphenoidal surgery. But in cases of persistent or recurrent disease after surgery, contraindications to surgery, severe hypercortisolism control before surgery, or for patients waiting for radiotherapy effects, medical therapy may be indicated. Pituitary-directed agents include cabergoline and pasireotide. Both drugs present similar potential for biochemical control and pasireotide has additionally been proved to reduce tumor volume. Moreover, pasireotide was evaluated in high quality studies. In respect to safety, both drugs are well tolerated and safe, but special attention should be given for cardiac valve disease and psychiatric disorder for cabergoline, and hyperglycemia for pasireotide.

The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

Currently, the first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel, are the mainstays of acromegaly treatment and achieve biochemical control in approximately 40% of patients and tumor shrinkage in over 60% of patients. Pasireotide, a second-generation SRL, shows higher efficacy with respect to both biochemical control and tumor shrinkage but has a worse safety profile. In this review, we discuss the future perspectives of currently available SRLs, focusing on the use of biomarkers of response and precision medicine, new formulations of these SRLs and new drugs, which are under development. Precision medicine, which is based on biomarkers of response to treatment, will help guide the decision-making process by allowing physicians to choose the appropriate drug for each patient and improving response rates. New formulations of available SRLs, such as oral, subcutaneous depot, and nasal octreotide, may improve patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life since there will be more options available that better suit each patient. Finally, new drugs, such as paltusotine, somatropin, ONO-5788, and ONO-ST-468, may improve treatment adherence and present higher efficacy than currently available drugs.

gsp Mutation Is Not a Molecular Biomarker of Long-Term Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: It is still controversial if activating mutations in the stimulatory G-protein α subunit (gsp mutation) are a biomarker of response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) treatment in acromegaly. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether gsp mutation predicts long-term response to fg-SRL treatment and to characterize the phenotype of patients harboring gsp mutations. METHODS: GNAS1 sequencing was performed by Sanger. SST2 and SST5 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time RT-PCR. The cytokeratin granulation pattern was evaluated by IHC. Biochemical control was defined as GH < 1.0 ng/mL and normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels. RESULTS: gsp mutation was found in 54 out of 136 patients evaluated. Biochemical control with fg-SRL treatment was similar in gsp+ and gsp- patients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.219). Tumors harboring gsp mutation were smaller (p = 0.035) and had a lower chance of invading cavernous sinuses (p = 0.001). SST5 protein (p = 0.047) and mRNA (p = 0.013) expression levels were higher in wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest series available in the literature, we concluded that gsp is not a molecular biomarker of response to fg-SRL treatment in acromegaly. However, the importance of its negative association with cavernous sinus invasion and SST5 expression needs to be further investigated.

GH and IGF-I levels and tumor shrinkage in response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: a comparative study between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil.

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical and tumor response rates between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil after primary and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in acromegaly. METHODS: Patients were classified as non-responders (NR), partial responders (PR), and full responders (FR) to 12-month SRL therapy according to: [criteria A] normal IGF-I and random GH (rGH) < 1 ng/mL (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I and/or rGH (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I and rGH (NR); [criteria B] normal IGF-I (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I (NR). Tumor shrinkage <20% defined poor responders (tPR) and ≥ 20% good responders (tGR). RESULTS: We studied 219 acromegaly patients (59% women, age 43.1 ± 13.9 years; 73 from Center I and 146 from Center II). After SRL therapy, the proportion of FR, PR, and NR by criteria A and B was 30.2 vs 49.1%, 52.8 vs 21.2% and 17 vs 29.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Considering criteria A or B separately, there was no difference in the proportion of FR, PR and NR between two centers. However, when comparing criteria A and B, the Center I showed a difference of 30.9% in classification of FR in relation to 13.2% observed in Center II (p = 0.006). tGR were 51.4% of patients, with no differences between the centers. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-I alone significantly increased positive response rates to SRLs, whereas the inclusion of rGH levels into therapeutic decision might lead to a significant increment on the costs of acromegaly management.

Machine Learning-based Prediction Model for Treatment of Acromegaly With First-generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

CONTEXT: Artificial intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), may be used to deeply analyze biomarkers of response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) in the treatment of acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model of therapeutic response of acromegaly to fg-SRL. METHODS: Patients with acromegaly not cured by primary surgical treatment and who had adjuvant therapy with fg-SRL for at least 6 months after surgery were included. Patients were considered controlled if they presented growth hormone (GH) <1.0 ng/mL and normal age-adjusted insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels. Six AI models were evaluated: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor classifier, support vector machine, gradient-boosted classifier, random forest, and multilayer perceptron. The features included in the analysis were age at diagnosis, sex, GH, and IGF-I levels at diagnosis and at pretreatment, somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and 5 (SST2 and SST5) protein expression and cytokeratin granulation pattern (GP). RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were analyzed. Controlled patients were older (P = .002), had lower GH at diagnosis (P = .01), had lower pretreatment GH and IGF-I (P < .001), and more frequently harbored tumors that were densely granulated (P = .014) or highly expressed SST2 (P < .001). The model that performed best was the support vector machine with the features SST2, SST5, GP, sex, age, and pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels. It had an accuracy of 86.3%, positive predictive value of 83.3% and negative predictive value of 87.5%. CONCLUSION: We developed a ML-based prediction model with high accuracy that has the potential to improve medical management of acromegaly, optimize biochemical control, decrease long-term morbidities and mortality, and reduce health services costs.

Análogos de somatostatina radiomarcados en el acercamiento diagnóstico del síndrome de Sjögren: Imágenes moleculares aportando a los criterios clínicos y paraclínicos hoy conocidos / Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues in the diagnostic approach to Sjögren's syndrome: molecular imaging contributing to the current clinical and para-clinical criteria

RESUMEN El diagnóstico del síndrome de Sjögren se basa en los criterios del consenso americano y europeo (AECG), sin embargo, en muchas oportunidades no se alcanza a detectar el compromiso glandular o extraglandular. Presentamos la evidencia de la utilidad de la gammagrafía con los análogos de somatostatina radiomarcados como prueba novedosa en el acercamiento diagnóstico al compromiso glandular y extraglandular del síndrome de Sjögren.

ABSTRACT Sjögren syndrome is diagnosed using American European Consensus Group (AECG) criteria, although frequently these criteria are not enough to detect the glandular and extra-glandular compromise. Evidence is presented on the use of whole body somatostatin scintigraphy as a novel probe in the diagnostic approach to the glandular and extra-glandular compromise in Sjögren s syndrome.

Novel therapies for acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Most of these comorbidities can be prevented or delayed with adequate disease treatment. Although three modalities of treatment (surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy) are available and new drugs were approved in the last decades, there are still some patients that maintain disease activity despite treatment. Therefore, there is a need for novel therapies for acromegaly and for that purpose new formulations of currently used drugs and also new drugs are currently under study. In this review, we summarize the novel therapies for acromegaly.