[IVOS â ¡ versus Sperm Class Analyzer in the results of semen analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results obtained from the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems of the two fully-automated commercial sperm quality analyzers, Hamilton-Thorn IVOS Ⅱ (IVOS Ⅱ) and Spanish Sperm Class Analyzer (SCA). METHODS: A total of 99 semen samples were collected in the Center of Reproduction of Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital from September 2018 to October 2018 and, according to the sperm concentration, divided into groups A (<15 ×106/ml), B (15－50 ×106/ml) and C (>50 ×106/ml). IVOS Ⅱ, SCA and manual microscopy were used for the examination of each sample, followed by comparison of the sperm concentration, sperm motility and percentage of progressively motile sperm (PMS) obtained from IVOS Ⅱ and SCA. RESULTS: The sperm concentrations derived from IVOS Ⅱ and SCA were significantly higher than that from manual microscopy in group A (ï¼»10.24 ± 4.60ï¼½ and ï¼»10.20 ± 5.11ï¼½ vs ï¼»8.45 ± 4.15ï¼½ ×106/ml, P < 0.05), but showed no statistically significant difference in group B (ï¼»30.95 ± 11.84ï¼½ and ï¼»31.81 ± 12.90ï¼½ vs ï¼»29.14 ± 10.65ï¼½ ×106/ml, P > 0.05) or C (ï¼»102.14 ± 45.97ï¼½ and ï¼»109.48 ± 46.32ï¼½ vs ï¼»104.74 ± 41.87ï¼½ ×106/ml, P > 0.05). Significant differences were not observed between IVOS Ⅱ and SCA in the percentage of PMS (ï¼»24.21 ± 14.62ï¼½% vs ï¼»23.92 ± 15.42ï¼½%, P > 0.05) or sperm motility (ï¼»37.48 ± 19.34ï¼½% vs ï¼»37.69 ± 16.61ï¼½%, P > 0.05) in group B, nor in group C (PMS: ï¼»30.80 ± 12.06ï¼½% vs ï¼»32.98 ± 16.10ï¼½%, P > 0.05; sperm motility: ï¼»44.50 ± 15.62ï¼½% vs ï¼»47.26 ± 17.46ï¼½%, P > 0.05). Both the percentage of PMS and sperm motility obtained from IVOS Ⅱ were remarkably lower than those derived from SCA in group A (PMS: ï¼»18.54 ± 12.96ï¼½% vs ï¼»22.90 ± 12.88ï¼½%, P < 0.05; sperm motility: ï¼»26.97 ± 14.05ï¼½% vs ï¼»34.90 ± 15.18ï¼½%, P < 0.05). IVOS Ⅱ and SCA both showed a high repeatability (CV <15%), and the former exhibited an even higher one than the latter, in detection of sperm concentration, sperm motility and the percentage of PMS. CONCLUSIONS: IVOS Ⅱ and SCA both had a good consistency in the results of sperm concentration, motility and progressive motility, but showed a poor comparability with low-concentration semen samples.

IVOS Ⅱ versus Sperm Class Analyzer in the results of semen analysis / 中华男科学杂志

Objective@#To compare the results obtained from the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems of the two fully-automated commercial sperm quality analyzers, Hamilton-Thorn IVOS Ⅱ (IVOS Ⅱ) and Spanish Sperm Class Analyzer (SCA).@*METHODS@#A total of 99 semen samples were collected in the Center of Reproduction of Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital from September 2018 to October 2018 and, according to the sperm concentration, divided into groups A (50 ×10⁶/ml). IVOS Ⅱ, SCA and manual microscopy were used for the examination of each sample, followed by comparison of the sperm concentration, sperm motility and percentage of progressively motile sperm (PMS) obtained from IVOS Ⅱ and SCA.@*RESULTS@#The sperm concentrations derived from IVOS Ⅱ and SCA were significantly higher than that from manual microscopy in group A (［10.24 ± 4.60］ and ［10.20 ± 5.11］ vs ［8.45 ± 4.15］ ×10⁶/ml, P 0.05) or C (［102.14 ± 45.97］ and ［109.48 ± 46.32］ vs ［104.74 ± 41.87］ ×10⁶/ml, P > 0.05). Significant differences were not observed between IVOS Ⅱ and SCA in the percentage of PMS (［24.21 ± 14.62］% vs ［23.92 ± 15.42］%, P > 0.05) or sperm motility (［37.48 ± 19.34］% vs ［37.69 ± 16.61］%, P > 0.05) in group B, nor in group C (PMS: ［30.80 ± 12.06］% vs ［32.98 ± 16.10］%, P > 0.05; sperm motility: ［44.50 ± 15.62］% vs ［47.26 ± 17.46］%, P > 0.05). Both the percentage of PMS and sperm motility obtained from IVOS Ⅱ were remarkably lower than those derived from SCA in group A (PMS: ［18.54 ± 12.96］% vs ［22.90 ± 12.88］%, P < 0.05; sperm motility: ［26.97 ± 14.05］% vs ［34.90 ± 15.18］%, P < 0.05). IVOS Ⅱ and SCA both showed a high repeatability (CV <15%), and the former exhibited an even higher one than the latter, in detection of sperm concentration, sperm motility and the percentage of PMS.@*CONCLUSIONS@#IVOS Ⅱ and SCA both had a good consistency in the results of sperm concentration, motility and progressive motility, but showed a poor comparability with low-concentration semen samples.

Influence of 6 different intestinal bacteria on Beltsville Small White turkey semen.

The turkey industry relies totally on artificial insemination to continue and improve production. If something compromises the insemination process, such as contaminated semen, it becomes a detrimental loss to the industry. Bacteria have been found in broiler breeder males to reduce sperm motility. The Sperm Quality Index (SQI) is a quick method to determine avian sperm motility using the sperm quality analyzer (SQA). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if bacteria have an effect on turkey sperm motility using the SQA. For the experiment, one mL of pooled neat semen was collected from Beltsville Small White Turkey toms. Six intestinal bacteria, Bifidobacterium animalis, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium bifermentans, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Salmonella enterica were grown overnight. For each bacterium, 4 treatments were made that consisted of exposing pooled semen to either saline, sterile broth, an overnight culture of each individual bacterium, or a centrifuged pellet of each bacterium re-suspended in saline. The experiment was repeated 3 times. Once the semen was exposed to the respective treatment, a portion was pulled into a capillary tube and placed into the SQA to obtain the SQI. Each treatment was evaluated at zero, 10, and 20 min creating a completely randomized design with a split plot over time. A pH reading also was taken at each time point. The results indicated that all broths containing bacteria immediately reduced turkey sperm motility. Sperm became practically immotile in overnight cultures of Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, or Lactobacillus However, there was a time by treatment interaction in the SQI for Campylobacter, Clostridium, E. coli, Salmonella, and Lactobacillus The pH of semen decreased upon exposure to Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus No difference in pH was found when semen was exposed to E. coli, Campylobacter, Salmonella, or Clostridium treatments. In conclusion, the results reveal when turkey semen is exposed to different bacteria, sperm motility is immediately reduced, which could be possible from bacterial attachment or bacterial by-products providing an undesirable environment for sperm.

Accuracy of sperm velocity assessment using the Sperm Quality Analyzer V.

Aim: The correct diagnosis of the functional capacity of human sperm is limited. The Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA) with the visualization system (SQA V, Medical Electronic System, Hatavorzo, Israel), an upgraded version of SQA, was recently developed to provide a rapid and low-cost quantitative evaluation of sperm quality as well as sperm velocity assessment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the SQA V's new parameters correlate with computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) estimates. Methods: Semen quality analysis of 66 fresh samples was determined using SQA V and CASA. Results: There were significant correlations of total sperm concentration (P < 0.001), sperm motility (P = 0.145), and percentage of progressive motile sperm (P = 0.001), between the SQA V variables and the CASA estimates. The sperm velocity assessed by SQA V was significantly correlated with some of the CASA estimates, including sperm motility (P = 0.001), the percentage of progressively motile sperm (P < 0.001), straight-line velocity (P < 0.001), curvilinear velocity (P < 0.001) and average path velocity (P < 0.001). However, it did not correlate with amplitude of lateral head displacement, beat cross frequency, straightness, or linearity, assessed by CASA. Conclusion: Assessment of sperm motility has been shown as one of the important factors to predict the functional capacity of human sperm. On the basis of the present study, SQA V is considered useful for screening sperm quality in the management of male infertility. (Reprod Med Biol 2003; 2: 151-157).