A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing BioMime Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Two-Year Outcomes of the meriT-V Trial.

Background: Drug-eluting stents (DESs) based on biodegradable polymers (BPs) have been introduced to reduce the risk for late and very late stent thrombosis (ST), which were frequently observed with earlier generations of DES designs based on durable polymers (DPs); however, randomized controlled trials on these DES designs are scarce. The meriT-V trial is a randomized, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial with a prospective, multicenter design that evaluated the 2-year efficacy of a novel third-generation, ultra-thin strut, BP-based BioMime sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus the DP-based XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of de novo lesions. Methods: The meriT-V is a randomized trial that enrolled 256 patients at 15 centers across Europe and Brazil. Here, we report the outcomes of the extended follow-up period of 2 years. The randomization of enrolled patients was in a 2:1 ratio; the enrolled patients received either the BioMime SES (n = 170) or the XIENCE EES (n = 86). The three-point major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (ID-TVR), was considered as the composite safety and efficacy endpoint. Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) was evaluated as well as the frequency of definite/probable ST, based on the first Academic Research Consortium definitions. Results: The trial had a 2-year follow-up completion rate of 98.44% (n = 252/256 patients), and the clinical outcomes assessment showed a nonsignificant difference in the cumulative rate of three-point MACE between both arms (BioMime vs. XIENCE: 7.74% vs. 9.52%, P = 0.62). Even the MI incidences in the BioMime arm were insignificantly lower than those of the XIENCE arm (1.79% vs. 5.95%, P = 0.17). Late ST was observed in 1.19% cases of the XIENCE arm, while there were no such cases in the BioMime arm (P = 0.16). Conclusions: The objective comparisons between the novel BP-based BioMime SES and the well-established DP-based XIENCE EES in this randomized controlled trial show acceptable outcomes of both the devices in the cardiac deaths, MI, ID-TVR, and ST. Moreover, since there were no incidences of cardiac death in the entire study sample over the course of 2 years, we contend that the findings of the study are highly significant for both these DES designs. In this preliminary comparative trial, the device safety of BioMime SES can be affirmed to be acceptable, considering the lower three-point MACE rate and absence of late ST in the BioMime arm over the 2-year period.

Persistent mycotic superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after endovascular treatment: a case report.

Mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are rare and are usually secondary to colonization of an atherosclerotic plaque during an episode of bacteremia. We describe the case of a 68 year-old diabetic male who presented to the Emergency Department with pyrexia and a painful expanding mass in the left thigh. He had a history of diarrhea and had been treated 16 days earlier for an SFA pseudoaneurysm that had been excluded with a covered stent with no adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Angio CT showed an abscess surrounding femoral vessels and stent thrombosis. Under general anesthesia, we performed extensive debridement, removal of the endovascular material, SFA ligation, and empirical antibiotic therapy. Blood and tissue cultures were positive for Escherichia coli. At the 3-months follow up visit, the patient reported he had no claudication. In selected patients, mycotic pseudoaneurysms can be treated by SFA ligation.

Pseudoaneurismas micóticos da artéria femoral superficial (AFS) são raros, e geralmente são secundários à colonização de uma placa aterosclerótica durante bacteremia. Relatamos o caso de um paciente masculino diabético de 68 anos que chegou ao Serviço de Emergência com pirexia e massa expansiva dolorosa na coxa esquerda. Apresentava histórico de diarreia e havia sido tratado 16 dias antes para pseudoaneurisma da AFS, que foi excluído com stent coberto e sem antibioticoterapia adjuvante. A angiotomografia computadorizada demonstrou um abscesso ao redor dos vasos femorais e trombose do stent. Sob anestesia geral, realizamos desbridamento extenso, remoção do material endovascular, ligadura de AFS e antibioticoterapia empírica. Culturas de sangue e tecidos foram positivas para Escherichia coli. Na consulta de seguimento aos 3 meses, o paciente negou claudicação. Em pacientes selecionados, pseudoaneurismas micóticos podem ser tratados com ligadura de AFS.

Trombosis muy tardía de stent metálico convencional: Un suceso inesperado

RESUMEN La trombosis muy tardía de stent es un fenómeno de baja frecuencia, pero de elevada morbilidad y mortalidad. Dentro de sus factores predisponentes se encuentran parámetros clínicos, anatómicos y relacionados con el procedimiento. Múltiples son los mecanismos fisiopatológicos que se plantean como responsables de la trombosis de stent. El tratamiento de esta complicación consiste en intentar restaurar el flujo del vaso lo antes posible. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con el diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST secundario a trombosis muy tardía de stent metálico convencional (20 meses), tratado exitosamente mediante intervencionismo coronario percutáneo con dos stents liberadores de sirolimus.

ABSTRACT Very late stent thrombosis is a rare complication but with high morbidity and mortality. Predisposing factors include clinical, anatomical and procedure-related parameters. Many pathophysiological mechanisms are considered to be responsible for stent thrombosis. The treatment of this complication consists of attempting to restore blood flow as soon as possible. We present the case of an individual diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after very late thrombosis of conventional bare metal stent (20 months). The patient was successfully treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with two sirolimus-eluting stents.

Comparative clinical performance of two types of drug-eluting stents with abluminal biodegradable polymer coating: Five-year results of the DESTINY randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Stents Coated With the Biodegradable Polymer on Their Abluminal Faces and Elution of Sirolimus Versus Biolimus Elution for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions - DESTINY Trial is a non-inferiority randomized study that compared the Inspiron™ sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with the control Biomatrix™ Flex biolimus-eluting stent (BES). Previous reports in the first year showed similar outcomes for both stents, in clinical, angiographic, optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound assessments. The present analysis aims to compare the clinical performance of these two biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents five years after the index procedure. METHODS: A total of 170 patients (194 lesions) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio for treatment with SES or BES, respectively. The primary endpoint for the present study was the five-year rate of combined major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: At five years, the primary endpoint occurred in 12.5% and 17.9% of the SES and BES groups, respectively (p=0.4). There was no definite or probable stent thrombosis among patients treated with the novel SES stent during the five years of follow-up, and no stent thrombosis after the first year in the BES group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Inspiron™ stent had similar good clinical performance in long-term follow-up when compared head-to-head with the control latest-generation Biomatrix™ Flex biolimus-eluting stent.

Persistent mycotic superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after endovascular treatment: a case report / Pseudoaneurisma micótico persistente da artéria femoral superficial após tratamento endovascular: relato de caso

Abstract Mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) are rare and are usually secondary to colonization of an atherosclerotic plaque during an episode of bacteremia. We describe the case of a 68 year-old diabetic male who presented to the Emergency Department with pyrexia and a painful expanding mass in the left thigh. He had a history of diarrhea and had been treated 16 days earlier for an SFA pseudoaneurysm that had been excluded with a covered stent with no adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Angio CT showed an abscess surrounding femoral vessels and stent thrombosis. Under general anesthesia, we performed extensive debridement, removal of the endovascular material, SFA ligation, and empirical antibiotic therapy. Blood and tissue cultures were positive for Escherichia coli. At the 3-months follow up visit, the patient reported he had no claudication. In selected patients, mycotic pseudoaneurysms can be treated by SFA ligation.

Resumo Pseudoaneurismas micóticos da artéria femoral superficial (AFS) são raros, e geralmente são secundários à colonização de uma placa aterosclerótica durante bacteremia. Relatamos o caso de um paciente masculino diabético de 68 anos que chegou ao Serviço de Emergência com pirexia e massa expansiva dolorosa na coxa esquerda. Apresentava histórico de diarreia e havia sido tratado 16 dias antes para pseudoaneurisma da AFS, que foi excluído com stent coberto e sem antibioticoterapia adjuvante. A angiotomografia computadorizada demonstrou um abscesso ao redor dos vasos femorais e trombose do stent. Sob anestesia geral, realizamos desbridamento extenso, remoção do material endovascular, ligadura de AFS e antibioticoterapia empírica. Culturas de sangue e tecidos foram positivas para Escherichia coli. Na consulta de seguimento aos 3 meses, o paciente negou claudicação. Em pacientes selecionados, pseudoaneurismas micóticos podem ser tratados com ligadura de AFS.

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a young patient with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Acute coronary syndrome rarely occurs in young individuals and is seldomly associated with antiphospholipid syndrome. We report the case of a 26-year-old Hispanic man who presented with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and was treated with urgent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. He experienced stent thrombosis within 48 h of intervention and subsequently developed a left apical thrombus. Hypercoagulable state studies were obtained at admission and 12 weeks after the event establishing the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: a case-control study.

To verify the frequency and predictors associated with stent thrombosis (ST) in a developing country. Observational, case-control study including 2535 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in two reference hospitals in Brazil, from October 2013 to December 2015. ST patients were matched to controls in a 1:3 ratio for gender, age, procedure indication, and performing hospital. From the total sample, 65 (2.5%) ST occurred and were matched with 195 controls (age 64.9 ± 11.8 years; hypertension, 78.8%; diabetes, 30%). Clopidogrel and aspirin early withdrawal (OR 19.25; 95% CI 1.66-23.52; p < 0.01 and OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.81-10.50; p = 0.001, respectively), hypertension (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.38-9.61; p = 0.006), dyslipidemia (OR 2.84; 95% CI 1.48-5.45; p = 0.002), smoking (OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.28-7.43; p = 0.02), body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.02-4.49; p = 0.012), previous myocardial infarction (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.14-7.47; p < 0.001), bifurcation lesion (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.05-5.67; p = 0.03), and ≥ 3 stents (OR 3.90; 95% CI 1.78-8.52; p = 0.002) were associated with ST. Stent type, diameter or length, severity of coronary artery disease, calcified lesions, and thrombus were not associated with ST. We found a similar frequency of ST from developed countries and identified strong predictors (clopidogrel and aspirin withdrawal, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, previous myocardial infarction, bifurcation lesion, number of stents), which are in line with reports from developed countries.

Restenosis, Stent Thrombosis, and Bleeding Complications: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis.

The field of interventional cardiology has significantly evolved over 40 years by overcoming several challenges. The introduction of first-generation drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the rates of restenosis, but at the expense of an increase of late stent thrombosis. Prolonged antithrombotic therapy reduced rates of stent thrombosis, but at the cost of increased bleeding. Although the advent of second-generation drug-eluting stents subsequently reduced the incidence of late stent thrombosis, its permanent nature prevents full recovery of vascular structure and function with accordant risk of very late stent failure. In the present era of interventional cardiology, the tradeoff between stent thrombosis, restenosis, and bleeding presents as a particularly complex challenge. In this review, the authors highlight major contributors of late/very late stent thrombosis while targeting stent restenosis, and they discuss evolutionary advances in stent technology and antiplatelet therapy, to further improve upon the care of patients with coronary artery disease.

Comparison of clinical outcomes regarding the use of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents (Titan) versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): An experience from a Cardiac Center-Third care level / Comparación de los resultados clínicos con respecto al uso de stents recubiertos de óxido de titanio (Titan) versus stents liberadores de zotarolimus (Endeavor) en pacientes con infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST (STEMI): Una experiencia de un centro cardiaco de Tercer nivel de atención

Abstract: Introduction: Internationally, the Titan bioactive stent efficacy and safety have been evaluated against second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In our field, however, there is not enough information about its short-term or one-year follow-up outcomes when compared with a second-generation drug-eluting stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objective: To evaluate and compare immediate, in-hospital and one-year use clinical outcomes of the Titan stent versus Endeavor stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Material and methods: A descriptive, comparative, longitudinal, retrospective, observational study was performed in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction type acute coronary syndrome who were subjected to primary, pharmacoinvasive and rescue angioplasties, using a Titan stent against Endeavor stent. Primary points: major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), death, myocardial infarction, need for target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), cerebrovascular event (CVE) and stent thrombosis. Secondary points: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) usage time. Results: 256 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were examined from January 2011 to December 2014. They were treated with a Titan bioactive stent (135 patients) or Endeavor stent (121 patients). There were no significant differences related to major adverse cardiac events, death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or cerebrovascular event, either in-hospital or one-year follow-up. More patients were observed in the Killip-Kimball 3-4 classification in Endeavor stent group versus patients in Titan stent group (62.2% versus 42.2%, respectively, p = 0.010). A greater pre-PTCA (Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0-1 flow rate was also observed (90.9% in Endeavor stent group versus 79.3% in Titan stent group, p = 0.010). However, the Titan stent was considerably more used in elderly patients (62.36 ± 12.95 years old versus 57.59 ± 10.42 years old in Endeavor stent group, p = 0.001); in more complex type C lesions (62.4% in Titan stent group versus 40.5% in Endeavor stent group, p = 0.010); and small vessels (28.9% in Titan stent group versus 18.2% in Endeavor stent group, p = 0.045). Target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were similar: 0% versus 2.5%, p = 0.066 and 0% versus 0.8%, p = 0.290, in Titan stent and Endeavor stent groups, respectively. There were no significant differences on the major adverse cardiac events-free survival analysis (Log-rank Mantel-Cox 0.764 test). There were significant differences on dual antiplatelet therapy usage time (6.46 ± 4.11 months in Titan stent group versus 10.98 ± 2.51 months in Endeavor stent group, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions: There was no superiority registered in use of a second-generation drug-eluting stent such as the Endeavor stent versus Titan bioactive stent (titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction regarding immediate, in-hospital and one-year follow-up clinical outcomes. The Titan stent seems to be a good choice for this kind of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in both efficacy and safety against new drug-eluting stents, and it could be used in elderly patients and/or patients with high bleeding risk requiring less time of dual antiplatelet therapy.(AU)

Resumen: Introducción: A nivel internacional, la eficacia y la seguridad de los stents bioactivos Titan se han evaluado en comparación con los stents liberadores de fármacos (su sigla en inglés es DES) de segunda generación en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Sin embargo, en nuestro campo, no hay suficiente información acerca de sus resultados de seguimiento a corto plazo o de un año cuando se compara con una endoprótesis liberadora de fármacos de segunda generación en el infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST (STEMI). Objetivo: Evaluar y comparar los resultados clínicos inmediatos, en el hospital y a un año de uso del stent Titan frente a stent Endeavor en pacientes con infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo, comparativo, longitudinal, retrospectivo y observacional en pacientes con el síndrome coronario agudo de infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST que fueron sometidos a angioplastias primarias, farmacoinvasivas y de rescate, utilizando un stent Titan contra el stent Endeavor. Puntos primarios: eventos cardiacos adversos mayores (MACE), muerte, infarto de miocardio, necesidad de revascularización de la lesión objetivo (TLR). Revascularización del vaso objetivo (TVR), evento cerebrovascular (CVE) y trombosis del stent. Puntos secundarios: Tiempo de uso de la terapia antiplaquetaria dual (DAPT). Resultados: De enero de 2011 a diciembre de 2014 se examinaron 256 pacientes con infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST. Fueron tratados con un stent bioactivo de Titan (135 pacientes) o un stent de Endeavor (121 pacientes). No hubo diferencias significativas relacionadas con los eventos cardiacos adversos mayores, muerte, infarto de miocardio, trombosis de stent o evento cerebrovascular, ni en el hospital ni en el seguimiento de un año. Se observaron más pacientes en la clasificación Killip-Kimball 3-4 en el grupo de stent Endeavor versus pacientes en el grupo de stent Titan (62.2% versus 42.2%, respectivamente, p = 0.010). También se observó una mayor tasa de flujo 0-1 antes de la PTCA (angioplastia coronaria transluminal percutánea) TIMI (trombólisis en el infarto de miocardio) (90.9% en el grupo de stent Endeavor frente a 79.3% en el grupo de stent Titan, p = 0.010). Sin embargo, la endoprótesis Titan se utilizó considerablemente más en pacientes de edad avanzada (62.36 ± 12.95 años frente a 57.59 ± 10.42 años en el grupo de endoprótesis Endeavor, p = 0.001); en las lesiones tipo C más complejas (62.4% en el grupo de stent Titan versus 40.5% en el grupo de stent Endeavor, p = 0.010); y en pequeños vasos (28.9% en el grupo de stent Titan versus 18.2% en el grupo de stent Endeavor, p = 0.045). La revascularización de las lesiones objetivo y las tasas de revascularización de los vasos objetivo fueron similares: 0% versus 2.5%, p = 0.066 y 0% versus 0.8%, p = 0.290, en los grupos de stent Titan y stent Endeavor, respectivamente. No hubo diferencias significativas en el análisis de supervivencia sin eventos cardiacos adversos mayores (ensayo de Mantel-Cox 0.764 del rango de logos). Hubo diferencias significativas en el tiempo de uso del tratamiento antiplaquetario dual (6.46 ± 4.11 meses en el grupo con stent Titan versus 10.98 ± 2.51 meses en el grupo con stent Endeavor, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusiones: No se registró una superioridad en el uso de un stent liberador de fármacos de segunda generación como el stent Endeavor versus el stent bioactivo Titan (stent recubierto de titanio-nitrurado) en pacientes con infarto de miocardio por elevación del segmento ST con respecto a los resultados clínicos de seguimiento inmediato, hospitalario y de un año. El stent Titan parece ser una buena opción para este tipo de síndrome coronario agudo por elevación del segmento ST, tanto en eficacia como en seguridad frente a nuevos stents liberadores de fármacos, y podría utilizarse en pacientes ancianos y/o pacientes con alto riesgo de hemorragia que requieran menos tiempo de tratamiento antiplaquetario dual.(AU)

Did Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Offer the Same Benefit in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Compared to Clopidogrel? Insights from Randomized Clinical Trials, Registries and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: According to ACC/ AHA guidelines, a minimum of 1 year of dual anti- platelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a platelet ADP-receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) is recommended for patients presenting acute coronary syndromes (ACS), regardless of which type of revascularization is performed during the acute event. METHODS: The purpose of this presentation was to review the present data either from a direct randomized comparison among the three compounds and also large prospective observational registries and meta-analysis were analyzed in detail. With this aim, we performed an extensive large search from PubMed/Medline Journals identifying studies comparing fashion the new P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ACS including ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in direct and indirect manner. RESULTS: Pivotal large randomized clinical trials (RCT) in patients with ACS including STEMI, comparing clopidogrel, a first generation P2Y12 inhibitor against the newer prasugrel and ticagrelor showed major efficacy advantages of the latters although both drugs had more bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Direct comparisons of prasugrel and ticagrelor from large RCT are not yet available, however, several observational registries and metaanalysis reported results from an indirect comparison between both compounds. Major findings and limitations of each of these studies were identified, highlighted and discussed. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both more effective than clopidogrel to prevent adverse cardiac events in patients with ACS. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel appears to be more effective in patients with STEMI, although lack of randomized data didn't allow to draw definitive conclusions.

Can We Improve the Outcomes of Multivessel Disease Using Modified SYNTAX and Residual SYNTAX Scores?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In spite of the benefits of drug eluting (DES), these advantages were not translated to better outcome when percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were compared with coronary artery bypass surgery. PCI strategy allowing stent deployment in all intermediate lesions including small vessels together with DES design may be the reasons of these findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently randomized and observational studies demonstrated using functional flow reserve analysis, residual Syntax score risk, or residual ERACI score after PCI that a reasonably incomplete revascularization was associated with good long-term outcome and low events rate at follow-up. In the ERACI IV study, which included patients with multiple vessel disease and left main, all intermediate lesions and severe lesions in small vessels were excluded from the revascularization strategy, and the 3-year follow-up results showed a remarkable low incidence of death/MI and stroke. Intermediate stenosis or severe lesions in small vessels should not be incorporated in the PCI strategy in order to define patient clinical cardiac prognosis or completeness of revascularization.

5-Year Safety and Efficacy of Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: The RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the 5-year cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events following Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation. BACKGROUND: Individual trials are often underpowered to show differences for low-frequency adverse events. The R-ZES was studied in 10 prospective clinical trials, designed with identical adverse event definitions, ascertainment, and adjudication. METHODS: The RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program includes 7,618 patients treated with R-ZES: RESOLUTE first-in-human study (N = 139), RESOLUTE All Comers (N = 1,140), RESOLUTE International (N = 2,349), RESOLUTE US (N = 1,402), RESOLUTE US 38 mm (N = 114), RESOLUTE Japan (N = 100), RESOLUTE Japan Small Vessel Study (N = 65), RESOLUTE Asia (N = 311), RESOLUTE China Randomized Controlled Trial (N = 198), and RESOLUTE China Registry (N = 1,800). The 5-year cumulative incidence of events was calculated. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of cardiac events was 13.4% for target lesion failure and included 5.0% cardiac death, 4.4% target vessel myocardial infarction, and 6.3% clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Dual-antiplatelet therapy at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91%, 37%, and 32%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 1.2%, which comprised 0.7% at 1 year and an annualized rate of 0.1% thereafter. Five-year use of dual-antiplatelet therapy varied geographically from 63% in Japan to 11% in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest group of R-ZES patients examined to date, the majority of stent-related events, including target vessel myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, occurred within the first year of implantation with much lower risks of these events out to 5 years.

Second vs. First generation drug eluting stents in multiple vessel disease and left main stenosis: Two-year follow-up of the observational, prospective, controlled, and multicenter ERACI IV registry.

OBJECTIVE: To compare second generation drug eluting stents (2DES) with first generation (1DES) for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiple coronary vessel disease (MVD). BACKGROUND: Although 2DES improved safety and efficacy compared to 1DES, MVD remains a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: ERACI IV was a prospective, observational, and controlled study in pts with MVD including left main and treated with 2DES (Firebird 2, Microport). We included 225 pts in 15 sites from Argentina. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and unplanned revascularization; and to compare with 225 pts from ERACI III study (1DES). PCI strategy was planned to treat lesions ≥70% in vessels ≥ 2.00 mm, introducing a modified Syntax score (SS) where severe lesions in vessels < 2.0 mm and intermediate lesions were not scored. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics showed that compared to ERACI III, ERACI IV pts had higher number of diabetics (P = 0.02), previous revascularization (P = 0.007), unstable angina IIb/IIIc (P < 0.001) and three vessels/left main disease (P = 0.003). Modified SS was 22.2 ± 11. At 2 years of follow-up ERACI IV group had significantly lower incidence of death+ MI + CVA, (P = 0.01) and MACCE (P = 0.001). MACCE rate was similar in diabetics, (5.8%) and nondiabetics (7.0%). After performing a matched propensity score, MACCE remain significantly lower in ERACI IV (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This registry showed that 2DES in MVD has a remarkable low incidence of MACCE in unadjusted and adjusted analysis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Three, six, or twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after DES Implantation in patients with or without acute coronary syndromes: anindividual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis of six randomized trials and 11 473 patients

AIM: We sought to determine whether the optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement varies according to clinical presentation.METHODS AND RESULTS:We performed an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis comparing short-term (≤6-months) versus long-term (1-year) DAPT as well as 3-month vs. 6-month vs 1-year DAPT. The primary study outcome was the 1-year composite risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). Six trials were included in which DAPT after DES consisted of aspirin and clopidogrel. Among 11 473 randomized patients 6714 (58.5%) had stable CAD and 4758 (41.5%) presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the majority of whom (67.0%) had unstable angina. In ACS patients, ≤6-month DAPT was associated with non-significantly higher 1-year rates of MI or ST compared with 1-year DAPT (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.48, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.22; P = 0.059), whereas in stable patients rates of MI and ST were similar between the two DAPT strategies (HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.65-1.35; P = 0.71; Pinteraction = 0.09). By network meta-analysis, 3-month DAPT, but not 6-month DAPT, was associated with higher rates of MI or ST in ACS, whereas no significant differences were apparent in stable patients. Short DAPT was associated with lower rates of major bleeding compared with 1-year DAPT, irrespective of clinical presentation. All-cause mortality was not significantly different with short vs. long DAPT in both patients with stable CAD and ACS.

[Experience with the use of the bio-active stent coated with titanium nitric oxide compared with zotarolimus-eluting stent: experience of a unit medical high specialty]. / Experiencia con el uso del stent bioactivo cubierto con titanio-óxido nítrico comparado con stent liberador de zotarolimus: experiencia de una unidad médica de alta especialidad.

UNLABELLED: The use of coronary stents in coronary angioplasty has evolved dramatically in its design, type materials, polymers, and a variety of drugs, the use of coronary stents covered nitric oxide have shown satisfactory results in practice, however compared to the results reported drug-eluting stents, there is little information. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of a stainless steel stent Bioactive nitric oxide coated titanium (BAS) and a drug-eluting stent zotarolimus (DES) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective, analytical, descriptive and comparative study aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of two devices with different characteristics in our population. The primary endpoints were: death, acute infarction (AMI), and re intervention injury Treated (RLT). RESULTS: A total of 759 patients were included in the study which was performed angioplasty to a single vessel. Were divided into two arms 382 with DES and 377 patients with BAS, the one year follow up was carried in 95%. After this follow-up period, primary points (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, TLR and stent thrombosis) for arm DES vs BAS; 9.5% vs 8.5% P=NS but with shorter periods of dual antiplatelet therapy for arm BAS 6.9±4.1 vs 11.1±2.5 months DES P=.0001. The results were independent of the clinical syndrome of presentation. CONCLUSIONS: After one year of follow no statistically significant difference in major clinical events, there was a trend in favour of BAS vs SM with respect to revascularization of the target lesion without reaching statistical significance.

One-Year Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The PRAGUE-19 Study.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent promising new technology, but data on their long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) setting are missing. The aim was to analyze 1-year clinical and computed tomographic angiographic outcomes after BVS implantation in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: PRAGUE-19 is a prospective multicenter single-arm study enrolling consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with intention-to-implant BVS. A total of 343 STEMI patients were screened during 15 months enrollment period, and 70 patients (mean age 58.6±10.3 and 74% males) fulfilled entry criteria and BVS was successfully implanted in 96% of them. All patients were invited for clinical and computed tomographic angiographic control 1 year after BVS implantation. Restenosis was defined as ≥75% area stenosis within the scaffolded segment. Three events were potentially related to BVS: 1 in-stent restenosis (treated 7 months after pPCI with drug-eluting balloon), 1 stent thrombosis (treated 2 weeks after pPCI by balloon dilatation-this patient stopped all medications after pPCI), and 1 sudden death at home 9 months after pPCI. Four other patients had events definitely unrelated to BVS. Overall, 1-year mortality was 2.9%. Computed tomographic angiography after 1 year was performed in 59 patients. All BVS were widely patent, and binary restenosis rate was 2% (the only restenosis mentioned above). Mean in-scaffold minimal luminal area was 7.8±2.6 mm(2), area stenosis was 20.1±16.3%, minimal luminal diameter was 3.0±0.6 mm, and diameter stenosis was 12.8±11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: BVS implantation in STEMI is feasible and safe and offers excellent 1-year clinical and angiographic outcomes.

Clinical performance of a novel ultrathin strut, low-dose, sirolimus-eluting stent with abluminal-only biodegradable polymeric coating for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the daily practice.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance, in the daily practice of a busy catheterization laboratory, of a novel drug-eluting stent (DES) built with an ultra-thin-strut metallic platform, eluting sirolimus at low doses, abluminal coated with biodegradable polymers, and mounted in a low-compliant delivery system. METHODS: Prospective, single-arm study, comprising all consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Inspiron™ sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Scitech, Aparecida de Goiania, Brazil). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [cardiac death, non-PCI related myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR)]. RESULTS: A total of 470 patients were included, from which 51.3% were diabetics, 33.8% had triple-vessel disease, 15.3% had heart failure, 38.9% had at least one bifurcation treated, 19.8% were treated for a bare metal stent restenosis, and 61.9% had at least one type C lesion; one or more of these features were found in 96.0%. At 300 days, the rate target lesion revascularization was 5.4% and the rate of MACE was 8.1%. The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.4%, with no cases between 30 and 300 days. CONCLUSIONS: The novel stent is associated with excellent short and mid-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with PCI in the daily practice.

Trombosis de la endoprótesis vascular (stent)actualización para el médico clínico / Stent thrombosis: update for the clinician

La introducción de las endoprótesis vasculares (stents) ha reducido notablemente el riesgo de reestenosis en pacientes sometidos a intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP). Estos pueden ser metálicos (barestents, BS) o liberadores de fármacos (drugelutingstents, DES), dentro de Los cuales podemos encontrar DES de primera y segunda generación. Luego de la colocación del stent, se prescribe terapia antiplaquetaria con aspirina y un inhibidor P2Y12 por un año como mínimo. Sin embargo, es posible que ocurra una trombosis de stent (TS), la cual es una emergencia médica y obliga a que et paciente en la cual se produce, sea sometido a una coronariografía de emergencia.

The use of stent implantation, had dramatically diminished the risk of restenosis in patients submitted to coronary interventions. These could be bare stents (BS) or drug eluting stents (DES). We can also find DES from first and second generations. After stent placement, we must prescribe antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and a P2Y 12 inhibitor, at least for one year. However, it is possible the occurrence of a stent thrombosis (ST), which is a medical emergency and where an emergency coronary procedure must be indicated.

Valor de la tomografía de coherencia óptica en el tratamiento guiado de la falla del stent: Presentación de un caso / Value of the optical coherence tomography in the treatment guided of the stent failure: Case report

Desde la llegada de los stents convencionales y farmacoactivos han disminuido considerablemente los eventos de revascularización quirúrgica, sin embargo la trombosis y reestenosis son 2 factores que, aunque han disminuido, permanecen como complicaciones importantes. Existen varios factores que predisponen a la trombosis y a la reestenosis intrastent. La angiografía convencional tiene serias limitaciones para determinar las causas de la falla del stent. La tomografía de coherencia óptica es una técnica sumamente sensible para determinar las causas de trombosis y reestenosis del stent.

Since the advent of bare metal and drug-eluting stents, the surgical revascularization have declined considerably, however the thrombosis and in-stent restenosis are important complications of these devices. There are several factors that predispose to thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. Conventional angiography has serious limitations to determine the causes of stent failure. Optical coherence tomography is a very sensitive technique to determine the cause of thrombosis and in-stent restenosis.