Talocalcaneal coalition classifications: A critical analysis review and suggested new classification system with implications for treatment.

Talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) is the second most frequent tarsal coalition reported. Our aim was to review talocalcaneal coalition classifications and to propose a new classification emphasizing a therapeutic approach. None of the classifications described for TCC mention the presence of flatfoot or valgus hindfoot, which are the key elements when defining the optimal treatment of this disease. We defined five clinical and radiological factors that would guide the choice of surgical treatment and based on these, we proposed a new classification system.

Hindfoot joint kinematics analysis after the resection of talocalcaneal coalition.

BACKGROUND: The subtalar joint movement between the talus and calcaneus is restricted in patients with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC). When the motion of the subtalar joint is restricted, shock absorption in the foot decreases, leading to pain during walking. Resection methods to maintain subtalar motion by removing abnormal unions have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to analyze the joint kinematics of patients who underwent TCC resection and to quantitatively evaluate the results of the surgery based on the measured kinematics. METHODS: Joint kinematics of five patients with TCC were obtained using a biplane fluoroscopic imaging system and an intensity-based two-/three-dimensional registration method. The joint kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and the tibiocalcaneal motion during the stance phase of walking were obtained. From the kinematics of the hindfoot joints, the inversion/eversion range of motion (ROM) of the patients before and after resection was statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test whether TCC resection improved the ROM. RESULTS: During the loading response period, the eversion ROM of the subtalar joint and tibiocalcaneal motion significantly increased postoperatively. In addition, a significant postoperative increase was observed in the subtalar and tibiocalcaneal inversion ROM during the pre-swing period. SIGNIFICANCE: TCC resection surgery increased the ROM of the subtalar joint, which in turn contributed to the increase in tibiocalcaneal ROM. Increased subtalar and tibiocalcaneal ROM could result in increased shock attenuation and may be a contributing factor to pain relief during walking.

Resection of Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal Coalitions With Surgical Correction of the Hindfoot Valgus Deformity in One Step.

Background: Calcaneonavicular (CNC) and talocalcaneal (TCC) coalitions are the most common cause of rigid flatfoot in children. After resection, correction of the most frequent valgus-hindfoot deformity usually requires a second-step surgery. We report results of a retrospective study of patients treated with a one-step correction. Methods: Between 2008 and 2019, data were collected on 26 patients (19 male, 7 female) affected by CNC (n = 18) and TCC (n = 13), all with rigid symptomatic flatfeet. Average age at surgery was 12.5 ± 1.1 (SD) years (range, 9.8-15.2). All patients (26/26) underwent resection, 20 of 26 underwent at the same time subtalar extraarticular screw arthroereisis (SESA) for correction of residual hindfoot valgus deformity. Pre- and postoperative talocalcaneal angle according to Costa Bartani and Talar inclination angle in weightbearing were measured. Twenty-five of 26 patients had postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. Results: Pre- and postoperative talocalcaneal average angle for CNC was respectively 141.5 ± 7.7 degrees and 130.5 ± 5.2 degrees (P < .0001) and 143.7 ± 7.7 degrees and 129.7 ± 7.0 degrees (P < .0001) for TCC. Talar inclination average angle for CNC was 29.2 ± 5.3 degrees and 19.3 ± 1.6 degrees (P < .0001) and 31.2 ± 6.4 degrees and 21.4 ± 3.4 degrees (P < .0001) for TCC. Average follow-up (FU) was 4.7 ± 3.0 years (range, 6 months-11.9 years, median 4.9 years), with a mean age at FU of 17.2 ± 5.8 (SD) years (min 12.1, max 25.3, median 16.8 years). The mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score for CNC and for TCC was 96.6 (range 83-100) for resection and valgus correction as one-step procedure with no statistical difference (P = .5) between CNC and TCC. No patients had additional surgery for complications or recurrence. Conclusion: Symptomatic rigid flatfeet affected by CNC and TCC treated with coalition resection and minimally invasive subtalar arthroereisis (SESA) for residual hindfoot valgus correction in one step in adolescent age achieved good to excellent results in all cases. Further surgery to correct malalignment was avoided. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.

Outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes. METHODS: The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and was performed in four databases: MEDLINE, Central, Scopus and Web of Science. The protocol has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), complications, revisions and radiographic recurrence were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was applied for analysis of data heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies including 760 tarsal coalitions were included and had a weighted average follow-up of 44 months. Studies scored fair to poor on the risk of bias assessment with a mean MINORS score of 67% (44-81%). In 77.8% (37.5-100%) of surgically treated tarsal coalitions, good/excellent/non-limiting or improved PROMs were reported. Calculated data heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 57%). Open bar resection with material interposition had a clinical success rate of 78.8% (50-100%). Complications occurred in 4.96% of cases. Coalition size did not prove to be a determining factor in postoperative outcome. The influence of the coalition type was not investigated by any of the studies. CONCLUSION: Data on outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions is limited to retrospective case series with high risk of bias and moderate data heterogeneity. In about ¾ of cases, open resection and interposition of material results in improved PROMs. The arbitrary margin of ≥ 50% of TC coalition size in relation to the posterior facet has little importance in surgical decision-making. None of the studies reported on the influence of the coalition type on postoperative clinical success.

Midterm Outcomes of Talocalcaneal Coalition Arthroscopic Resection in Adults.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic resection of the talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) has been reported to be associated with good short-term outcomes. However, the midterm outcomes of this approach remain uncertain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent arthroscopic resection for symptomatic TCC. The patients were divided into 2 groups (group P, patients with isolated posterior facet coalition; and group MP, patients with both middle and posterior facet coalition). The preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale scores were calculated. The postoperative AOFAS and VAS scores between the 2 groups were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 26.0±8.5 years, and the mean follow-up period was 56.9±18.0 months. Thirteen (41%) patients were in group P, whereas 19 (59%) patients were in group MP. Postoperative VAS and AOFAS scores improved more significantly than preoperative scores. At the final follow-up, excellent and good subjective outcomes were attained in 26 patients (81%), fair and poor outcomes in 6 patients (19%). There were no statistical differences in the postoperative AOFAS (91.0±7.0 vs 85.8±10.8, P = .532) and VAS score (2.1±1.7 vs 4.0±2.6, P = .537) between patients with the ratio of coalition/posterior facet more than or less than 50%. There were no statistical differences in postoperative VAS score (1.8±1.3 vs 2.6±2.2, P = .236) and AOFAS score (92.5±5.6 vs 89.2±8.7, P = .297) between group P (n=13) and group MP (n=19), either. Three patients (9.4%) had complications, including these notable findings: 1 patient complained of restricted dorsal flexion, 1 with computed tomography-proven coalition recurrence, and 1 with partial tibial nerve injury. CONCLUSION: We found that TCC arthroscopic resection was generally associated with reasonable outcomes at midterm follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

8 out of 10 patients do well after surgery for tarsal coalitions: A systematic review on 1284 coalitions.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim was to determine the clinical success rate after treatment for talocalcaneal (TCC) and calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC). The secondary aim was to evaluate the complication, recurrence and revision rate. METHODS: A search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and was pooled per type of coalition and treatment modality. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of the success rates were calculated. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, coalition recurrence rates, revision rates and pain improvement using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A sub-analysis on interposition material was performed. RESULTS: 43 articles comprising of 1284 coalitions were included, with a pooled mean follow-up of 51 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall pooled success rate for TCCs was 79% (95% CI, 75%-83%). Conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection of TCCs resulted in success rates of 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%), 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) and 86% (95% CI, 71%-94%), respectively. CNCs have an overall success rate of 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%), with 100% (95% CI, 34%-100%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-85%) and 100% (95% CI, 65%-100%) for conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection, respectively. Pooled complication rates of 4% (95% CI, 3%-7%) for TCCs and 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%) for CNCs were found. The success rates of resection with and without interposition material for TCCs were 83% (95% CI, 78%-87%) and 79% (95% CI, 65%-88%), and for CNCs 81% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and 69% (95% CI, 44%-85%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of tarsal coalitions can be considered good to excellent as well as safe, with an overall clinical success rate of 79% for TCCs and 81% for CNCs. Arthroscopic resection of the coalition appears to be non-inferior to open resection of TCCs and CNCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic Review.

Medial talar resection: how much remains stable?

PURPOSE: Pathologies of the medial talus (e.g., fractures, tarsal coalitions) can lead to symptomatic problems such as pain and nonunion. Bony resection may be a good solution for both. It is unclear how much of the medial talus can be taken before the subtalar joint becomes unstable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect a limited resection of the medial talar facet and the anteromedial portion of the posterior talar facet has on subtalar stability. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower limbs were mounted in a frame for simulated weight-bearing. Computed tomography scans were obtained under 700 N single-legged stance loading, with the foot in neutral, 15° inversion, and 15° eversion positions. A sequential resection of 10, 20, and 30% of the medial facet and the anteromedial portion of the posterior talar facet to the calcaneus, based on the intact talus width, was performed. Measurements of subtalar vertical angulation, talar subluxation, coronal posterior facet angle and talocalcaneal (Kite) angle in the anteroposterior and lateral view were performed. RESULTS: Gross clinical instability was not observed in any of the specimens. No significant differences were detected in the measurements between the resected and intact states (P ≥ 0.10) as well as among the resected states (P ≥ 0.11). CONCLUSION: In a biomechanical setting, resecting up to 30% of the medial facet and anteromedial portion of the posterior facet based on the intact talus width-does not result in any measurable instability of the subtalar joint in presence of intact ligamentous structures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Bone stress injuries in the presence of tarsal coalition as a cause of hindfoot pain in adolescents: case series of 6 patients with literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight causal relationship between stress fracture in the presence of tarsal coalition and hindfoot pain in adolescents on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the clinical and MRI imaging findings of 6 adolescents referred for MRI to evaluate symptoms of hindfoot pain with possible tarsal coalition. MRI studies were systematically assessed for cause of hindfoot pain, types of tarsal coalition, patterns of stress fractures, bone marrow oedema and any other associated features. RESULTS: All the 6 patients (4 male: 2 female) aged between 12 and 19 years developed insidious onset of hindfoot or midfoot pain over a period of weeks to months. On MRI, all 6 cases had features of fibrous tarsal coalition predominantly in the calcaneonavicular articulation (5 out of 6 patients). Associated stress fractures/response were in the posterior facet/body of the calcaneus (3), talar head (2), cuboid (1) and third metatarsal bone in one patient. CONCLUSION: Stress fractures/response adjacent to tarsal coalition could be because of altered biomechanics and can be an unusual cause of hindfoot pain in adolescents. A high index of suspicion and complementary MRI findings is crucial to interpret this condition to direct appropriate patient management.

Fracture through Pre-Existing Tarsal Coalition: A Narrative Review.

Tarsal coalitions are abnormal fibrous or bony connections between the tarsal bones of the foot. While not always symptomatic, coalitions can cause pain, alterations in forefoot and hindfoot morphology, and alterations in foot and ankle biomechanics. Previous research has described the association of tarsal coalitions with fractures of the lower extremity. Multiple reports of acute fracture in the presence of tarsal coalition have been presented, as have reports of stress fractures of the foot and ankle with concomitant coalition, insidious in onset and thought to be related to aberrancies in foot and ankle biomechanics. The purpose of this review is to discuss the biomechanics seen in tarsal coalitions and to describe reports of fracture occurring concomitantly with tarsal coalitions. We will discuss diagnostic options and treatment approaches in the setting of fracture with preexisting tarsal coalition.

Endoscopic resection of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition in adolescents using a posterior approach / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective:To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic resection of symptomatic talocalcaneal coalitions in adolescents using a posterior approach.Methods:A retrospective case-series study was performed to analyze the data of 15 adolescent patients (16 feet) with symptomatic talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC) who had been treated by posterior arthroscopy from February 2017 to December 2020 at Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital. There were 11 boys and 4 girls with an average of 14.3 years (from 11 to 17 years). The left side was affected in 9 and the right side in 5 patients, and both sides were involved in one. Ten patients had a history of ankle sprain. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) postoperatively.Results:The 15 patients were followed up for a mean time of 19.9 months (from 12 to 36 months). At the final follow-up, the VAS significantly decreased from preoperative 6 (6, 7) points to 1 (1, 3) point, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score significantly increased from preoperative (54.1±10.4) points to (90.0±16.6) points, and the SF-36 score significantly improved from preoperative (55.5±12.7) points to (88.7±6.5) points ( P<0.05). Follow-ups found such complications as infection, TCC recurrence or osteoarthritis in none of the patients. Conclusion:Endoscopic TCC resection using a posterior approach is an effective surgery for symptomatic TCC in adolescents, showing advantages of limited invasion, fast recovery, a low rate of postoperative complications and precise resection.

Surgical Treatment of Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal Coalitions.

Tarsal coalition is determined by an absence of segmentation between one or more foot bones. The main symptom is activity-related foot pain, usually dorsolateral for calcaneonavicular coalitions and medial for talocalcaneal ones. At presentation, a symptomatic tarsal coalition must be treated conservatively for at least 6 months. If the conservative treatment fails and the foot is still painful, resection is the treatment of choice. Advantage of surgery is to restore mobility and reduce the risk of subsequent degenerative arthritis. Common pitfalls of surgery include failure to recognize associated coalitions, inadequate or extensive resection, and injury of adjoining bones.

Concomitant Talocalcaneal Coalition as a Risk Factor for Early Relapse Following Ponseti Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot.

Concomitant talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) in idiopathic clubfeet is not well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with very early relapsing idiopathic clubfeet associated with TCC. Although cases have been successfully treated with the Ponseti casting method, all recurred within 2 months of removing the final cast. A single-centre cohort of twelve feet in eight patients treated by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2020 was investigated retrospectively. Recurred cavus with variable degrees of equinus was the earliest findings noted. TCC was incidentally detected during the open reduction of the earliest three feet in our series. Afterwards, ultrasonography was advised as a screening tool for detecting an associated anomaly; however, only the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was 100% accurate in diagnosing concurrent TCC. All coalitions were cartilaginous and the posterior facet was most commonly involved facet. The average age was 18 months for the coalition resection and open reduction of a dislocated talonavicular joint, and the average duration of follow-up was 52 months. None of the patients showed clinical signs of relapse at the latest follow-up. We recommend that an associated TCC should be considered in very early relapsing idiopathic clubfoot cases.

A new classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on computed tomography for operative planning.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications emphasize the morphology of the coalition, however, subtalar joint facets involved should also be emphasized. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a new classification system based on the articular facets involved to cover all coalitions and guide operative planning. METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with talocalcaneal coalition using a CT scan, between January 2009 and February 2021. The coalition was classified into four main types according to the shape and nature of the coalition: I, inferiorly overgrown talus or superiorly overgrown calcaneus; II, both talus and calcaneus overgrew; III, coalition with an accessory ossicle; IV, complete osseous coalition (I-III types are non-osseous coalition). Then each type was further divided into three subtypes according to the articular facets involved. A, the coalition involving the anterior facets; M, the coalition involving the middle facets, and P, the coalition involving the posterior facets. Interobserver reliability was measured at the main type (based on nature and shape) and subtype (articular facet involved) using weighted Kappa. Results There were 106 patients (108 ft) included in this study. Overall, 8 ft (7.5%) were classified as type I, 75 ft (69.4%) as type II, 7 ft (6.5%) as type III, and 18 ft (16.7%) as type IV. Twenty-nine coalitions (26.9%) involved the posterior facets only (subtype-P), 74 coalitions (68.5%) involved both the middle and posterior facets (subtype-MP), and five coalitions (4.6%) simultaneously involved the anterior, middle, and posterior facets (subtype-AMP). Type II-MP coalition was the most common. The value of weighted Kappa for the main type was 0.93 (95%CI 0.86-0.99) (p<0.001), and the value for the subtype was 0.78 (95%CI 0.66-0.91) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A new classification system of the talocalcaneal coalition to facilitate operative planning was developed.

The C-sign in normal feet: a prospective study and novel imaging algorithm for subtalar joint tarsal coalition.

OBJECTIVE: The C-sign on lateral radiographs has been subject to considerable debate with respect to its reliable association to subtalar joint tarsal coalition. The purpose of this study was to determine to what degree subtalar joint pronation factors into (a) the appearance of both complete and incomplete type A C-signs and (b) the conspicuity of the middle facet in both flatfeet and rectus feet. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-seven normal adult volunteers were enrolled into the study with a total of 92 feet, of which 42 were flexible flatfeet and 50 were rectus feet with normal subtalar joint range of motion. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs were taken of each foot in a position of (a) standing and (b) maximum subtalar joint pronation. Investigators evaluated images for the visibility of the middle facet, and the presence or absence of a continuous or interrupted type A C-sign. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: No continuous C-signs were produced with extreme pronation in either the rectus/normal or flatfoot populations. Three incomplete type A C-signs were produced with pronation, two of which were in rectus feet. Two absent middle facet signs were also produced with pronation. Absent visualization of the facet had high positive and negative predictive values (1.00 and 0.99 respectively) for the presence of an incomplete C-Sign. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The standard, routine lateral foot/ankle radiographic image protocol for suspected talocalcaneal coalition should be modified routinely positioning the foot maximally supinated, thereby minimizing the possibility of producing C-signs (complete or type A incomplete) and/or absent middle facet signs with pronation in either normal or flatfeet. A novel algorithmic approach can then be simply applied to determine when ancillary CT scanning is warranted for suspected posterior facet coalition.

Morphologic Analysis of Nonosseous Talocalcaneal Coalitions Using 3D Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Resection of talocalcaneal coalitions has generally involved osseous coalitions. We attempted to evaluate the morphology of nonosseous talocalcaneal coalitions. This study aimed to investigate if the calcaneal articular surface area of feet with talocalcaneal coalitions is different than that of normal feet. METHODS: Twenty nonosseous talocalcaneal coalition cases with analyzable computed tomography (CT) scans were compared to 20 control cases. Three-dimensional models of the talus and calcaneus were constructed, and the surface areas of the posterior facet (SPF), whole talocalcaneal joint of the calcaneus (SWJ), and coalition site (SCS) of each 3D-CT model were measured. "Calibrated" values of the 2 groups were created to adjust for relative size of the tali and then compared. The preoperative and postoperative AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scale was calculated for 9 cases that had undergone single coalition resection. RESULTS: The calibrated SPF and SWJ were significantly greater in the coalition group than in the control group (40% and 12%, respectively). No significant difference was detected between the calibrated (SWJ - SCS) value of the coalition group and the calibrated SWJ value of the control group. The AOFAS scale was improved postoperatively in all 9 cases analyzed. CONCLUSION: The calcaneal articular surface of nonosseous talocalcaneal coalition feet in our series was larger than that of the normal feet. This study indicates that the total calcaneal articular surface after coalition resection may be comparable to the calcaneal articular surface of normal feet. We suggest that the indication for coalition resection be reconsidered for nonosseous coalition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Post-operative outcomes of arthroscopic tarsal coalition resection: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions is a relatively new technique. This systematic review aimed to investigate the post-operative complications and functional outcomes in arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for studies that reported outcomes in arthroscopic resection of tarsal coalitions. RESULTS: 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Post-operative outcomes were reported in 103 cases. The overall complication rate was 13.6%. Tibial nerve injury was reported in 1 patient. All included studies demonstrated post-operative improvement in functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic resection is a feasible and effective treatment method for symptomatic tarsal coalitions.

Endoscopic Resection of Tarsal Coalitions.

Endoscopic resection of tarsal coalitions is technically feasible for both talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions. Careful consideration of each individual patient is necessary before proceeding with endoscopic resection. Endoscopic resection of these coalitions may offer benefits in terms of faster recovery and less wound problems, but this has not been proven. Several case reports and case series appear in the literature and are reviewed here along with the different techniques reported. Better-quality evidence is required to assess the clinically relevant benefits and the recurrence rate for endoscopic resection in comparison with open resection.

The radiological diagnosis of extra-articular posteromedial talocalcaneal coalition.

OBJECTIVES: Extra-articular posteromedial talocalcaneal coalition (EA-PM TCC) accounts for approximately one-third of TCC, but its radiographic features are not well-described. The current study aims to compare the radiographic features of EA-PM TCC with normal ankles and with the commoner forms of TCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of cases of TCC over 12 years for whom radiographs, CT, and/or MRI study were available. Radiographs were assessed by 2 radiologists for the presence of the C-sign, talar beak, dysmorphic sustentaculum, absent middle facet, and prominence of the posterior subtalar joint. TCC was classified by a third radiologist based on CT/MRI findings into 3 groups: no TCC, EA-PM TCC, and other TCCs. The radiographic findings for the 3 groups were compared. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, 28 males and 22 females with a mean age of 21.1 years (range 8-70 years). In 15 patients, both ankles had been imaged, resulting in a total of 65 cases. In 17 ankles, no TCC was identified, while 15 ankles were classified as EA-PM TCC and 33 as having other types of TCC. There were no statistically significant differentiating radiological features between the groups with no TCC and EA-PM TCC apart from prominence of the posterior subtalar joint, while only the C-sign allowed identification of patients with other types of TCC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that EA-PM TCC cannot be diagnosed based on the classical indirect radiological signs of TCC, but can be identified by prominence of the posterior subtalar joint.

[Evans lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomy in treatment of talocalcaneal coalition with hindfoot valgus deformity].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of the Evans lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomy (E-LLCOT) in treatment of talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) with hindfoot valgus deformity. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2017, 10 patients (13 feet) of TCC with hindfoot valgus deformities underwent E-LLCOTs. There were 6 males (8 feet) and 4 females (5 feet) with an age of 13-18 years (mean, 15.8 years). The disease duration was 10-14 months (mean, 11.5 months). The foot deformity was characterized by hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and collapse of the medial arch. Pain site was the tarsal sinus in 4 feet, TCC in 5 feet, and ankle joint in 4 feet. There were tightness of the gastrocnemius in 3 cases (4 feet) and Achilles tendon in 7 cases (9 feet) on Silverskiold test. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score was 46.54±9.08 and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.54±0.88 after walking 1 kilometer. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were adopted to evaluate the postoperative function of the foot. The talar-first metatarsal angle (T1MT), talonavicular coverage angle (TCA), talar-horizontal angle (TH), calcaneal pitch angle (CP), and heel valgus angle (HV) were measured after operation. RESULTS: All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 18 months). At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were 90.70±6.75 and 1.85±0.90, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores ( t=-23.380, P=0.000; t=35.218, P=0.000). X-ray films showed that the osteotomy healed at 2-4 months (mean, 3 months) after operation. At last follow-up, the T1MT, TCA, TH, and HV were significantly lower than preoperative ones ( P<0.05), and the CP was significantly higher than preoperative one ( P<0.05). During the follow-up, the pain did not relieve obviously in 1 patient (1 foot), and the cutaneous branch of the sural nerve injured in 1 patient (1 foot). CONCLUSION: For TCC with severe hindfoot valgus deformity, E-LLCOT can effectively correct deformity and relieve pain.

[Effectiveness of a modified posterior approach for arthroscopic resection on painful talocalcaneal coalition in adults].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic talocalcaneal coalition resection in painful adults via a modified posterior approach. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2017, 9 patients with painful talocalcaneal coalition accepted arthroscopic resection via the posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach. Of them, 6 were male and 3 were female, aged from 19 to 30 years (mean, 24 years). Among them, 2 cases had no definite local trauma and 7 cases had a history of sprain of foot and ankle. The disease duration ranged from 6 to 30 months, with a median of 12 months. Rozansky classification of talocalcaneal coalition for the 9 patients: 5 cases (5 feet) were type Ⅰ, 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅱ, and 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅲ. The patients had no sequelae of limb dysfunction and no limb joint surgery in the past. All the patients received anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT scans of the ankle joint during follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot score were used to evaluate the effectiveness. RESULTS: The operation time was 60-90 minutes (mean, 76 minutes). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All the incisions healed by first intention, without infection, skin necrosis, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, vascular nerve and tendon injury, bone bridge recurrence, and other complications. The ankle function recovered well and the pain was relieved obviously after operation, and the patients returned to work at 3-5 months after operation, with an average of 3.9 months. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.7±0.5, which was significantly improved ( t=20.239, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (4.2±0.5); the AOFAS ankle-hind foot score was 94±4, which was significantly improved ( t=-27.424, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (62±2). According to AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system, the results were excellent in 7 cases and good in 2 cases at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: It is more intuitive, more space, and more flexibility for operation via the modified posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach in talocalcaneal coalition. It is feasible to remove talocalcaneal coalition programmatically according to the specific anatomic signs during the operation.