Avoiding the needle: A quality improvement program introducing apixaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after major gynecologic cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery at our centre are recommended up to 28 days of enoxaparin for extended post-operative thromboprophylaxis (EP). Baseline survey revealed 92% patient adherence, but highlighted negative effects on patient experience due to the injectable route of administration. We aimed to improve patient experience by reducing pain and bruising by 50%, increasing adherence by 5%, and reducing out-of-pocket cost after introducing apixaban as an oral alternative for EP. METHODS: In this interrupted time series quality improvement study, gynecologic cancer patients were offered a choice between apixaban (2.5 mg orally twice daily) or enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously once daily) at time of discharge. A multidisciplinary team informed project design, implementation, and evaluation. Process interventions included standardized orders, patient and care team education programs. Telephone survey at 1 and 6 weeks and chart audit informed outcome, process, and balancing measures. RESULTS: From August to October 2022, 127 consecutive patients were included. Apixaban was chosen by 84%. Survey response rate was 74%. Patients who chose apixaban reported significantly reduced pain, bruising, increased confidence with administration, and less negative impact of the medication (p < 0.0001 for all). Adherence was unchanged (92%). The proportion of patients paying less than $125 (apixaban cost threshold) increased from 45% to 91%. There was no difference in bleeding and no VTE events. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of apixaban for EP was associated with significant improvement in patient-reported quality measures and reduced financial toxicity with no effect on adherence or balancing measures. Apixaban is the preferred anticoagulant for EP at our centre.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Disease burden and initiation of ambulatory thromboprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory thromboprophylaxis (AT) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) reduces venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk and is recommended for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. We evaluated VTE rates, severity, timing, and risk factors in PAC patients as well as AT rates and initiation times. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PAC were included. Data collected included patient demographics, medical history, PAC diagnosis, development of VTE, AT, and bleeding episodes. VTE was defined as a DVT or a PE. Patients were classified as receiving AT for VTE prevention if they received a prescription for outpatient anticoagulation. RESULTS: The cohort included 243 PAC patients. VTE occurred in 24 %. Overall, 52 % developing VTE were hospitalized and 5 % died as a result of the VTE. Of those who developed VTE 50 % were diagnosed within the first 2 months of PAC diagnosis. Univariate predictors of elevated VTE risk included an elevated Onkotev score, metastasis at diagnosis, male gender and not receiving AT. Multivariate predictors of elevated VTE risk included male gender (P = 0.014) and not receiving AT (P = 0.001). Overall, 30 % of patients received AT. The median time from diagnosis to initiation of AT was 43 days. Major bleeding occurred in 5.8 %. Patients receiving AT were not at a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (p = 0.5). Patients with intestinal tumor invasion were at significantly increased risk of major bleeding (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: VTE risk is significant and morbid in PAC patients. AT rates are low, and initiation is often delayed. Therapeutic endoscopists diagnosing PAC may be helpful in AT initiation.

A Multi-center Cross-Sectional Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Thromboprophylaxis.

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially avoidable condition that affects hospitalized patients. Risk stratification and preventative strategies have substantial evidence supporting their use, but reasons hinder widespread adoption, compliance, and success, explaining the continuation of VTE. Thromboprophylaxis consists of several measures that are frequently adopted to avoid the complications of VTE. The study evaluated knowledge, attitude, and practice toward using thromboprophylaxis by health professionals. Methods This multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out on health professionals involved in patient care working in various secondary and tertiary hospitals in the study region between October 2023 and February 2024. A previously published questionnaire was sent in the form of an online survey to the study participants. Fifteen, ten, and nine questions evaluated the participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice of thromboprophylaxis, respectively. The study followed the checklist for reporting results of the Internet E-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines. Frequency and percentages were calculated. Bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regression were carried out and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 219 participants, 115 (52.5%) and 104 (47.5%) were males and females. More than 50.7% were in the age group of >30 years, and the majority of the participants possessed a bachelor's (104 (47.5%)) degree. One hundred seventy-six (80.4%) of the study participants were working in government hospitals, and the majority (112 (51.1%)) were nurses. One hundred sixty-two (74% (67.63-79.65)), 175 (79.9% (73.98-85.01)) and 211 (96.3% (92.93)) had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practice regarding thromboprophylaxis, respectively. Regarding the facility characteristics, 196 (89.5%), 150 (68.5%), and 164 (74.9%) respondents agreed with the availability of a VTE prevention policy, VTE prevention consultants, and the availability of anticoagulants. Eighty (36.5%) participants responded with a 'not availability' of pneumatic compression devices. Of the 15 knowledge questions, the majority (124 (56.6%)) participants faulted the false statements regarding 'patients of DVT being symptomatic' and 119 (54.3%) on the statement that helping patients 'out of bed activity does not prevent VTE'. On multi-variable analysis, participants who were aware of having a VTE prevention policy and availability of anticoagulants were more knowledgeable with adjusted odds ratios of 5.39 (1.88-15.39) and 2.52 (1.12-5.63) respectively. Every practice domain received >90% approval ratings. Conclusions The study concludes that an overall satisfactory knowledge and positive attitude regarding thromboprophylaxis exists among the participants. The study proposes more training sessions on VTE prevention and orientation of health professionals on the availability of VTE policy guidelines and facility availability of resources for thromboprophylaxis.

Is Preoperative Chemoprophylaxis Safe for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of preoperative chemoprophylaxis (PEC) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing oncologic procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. METHODS: HNC patients with Caprini risk score (CRS) ≥5 who underwent inpatient surgery ≥3 hours between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, PEC and control, based on whether or not they received a single dose of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the 30-day rate of major bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 539 patients were included; 427 patients received PEC prior to surgery. The rate of major bleeding was 6.7%. The PEC cohort was more likely to have received concurrent aspirin or ketorolac (225 of 427 patients vs 36 of 112 patients; P = .0002), greater duration of chemoprophylaxis (7.8 vs 5.0 days; P < .0001), have higher CRS (7.2 vs 6.6; P < .0001), longer operative times (596 vs 512 minutes; P < .0001), higher blood loss (265 vs 214 ml; P = .02), and higher bleeding rates when compared to the control (34 of 427 patients; P = .03). On multivariate analysis, only PEC was associated with bleeding (odds ratio, 8.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-66.5). The rate of VTE was 1.3% and was not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: PEC was associated with an increase in bleeding and did not result in lower rates of VTE in patients with HNC. This study highlights the need to determine the optimal regimen of chemoprophylaxis in this patient cohort.

Evaluating Thromboprophylaxis Strategies for High-Risk Pregnancy: A Current Perspective.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents one of the leading causes of death during pregnancy. The greatest risk for it is the presence of medical or family history of VTE, stillbirth, cesarean section and selected thrombophilia. Appropriate thromboprophylaxis has the potential to decrease the risk of VTE in at-risk pregnant patients by 60-70%. Based on this, the authors reviewed the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases to identify the possibilities of thromboprophylaxis in pregnant patients with a high risk of VTE. Moreover, they summarized its management in specific situations, such as cesarean delivery or neuraxial blockade. Currently, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the preferred drugs for anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in the course of pregnancy and postpartum due to easy administration and a lower rate of adverse events.

HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES MELLITUS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY.

Introduction: Identifying risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is useful in deciding thromboprophylaxis for VTE. A retrospective study had shown an association between hypertension and diabetes mellitus with VTE in our population. The objective of this study was to confirm these findings and to determine if the complete blood count and coagulation tests can also be useful parameters in stratifying VTE patients for prophylaxis. Methods: This is a gender and age matched prospective case-control study of 45 Doppler's confirmed DVT and 43 apparently healthy controls. Results: Identified risk factors included history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous DVT, recent surgery, recent trauma, malignancy, sepsis, and immobility. The cases had a significantly lower mean haematocrit (33±7.4% vs 38±4.6%, p<0.001). Though no differences were observed in leucocyte and platelet counts between cases and controls but stratification as leucocytosis vs leucopaenia (P=0.003) and thrombocytosis vs thrombocytopaenia (P=0.045) differed between both groups. Also, the International normalized ratio (INR) was higher in cases (1.1±0.2 vs 1.0±0.1;P=0.001), hypercoagulable state (INR<0.9) and hypocoagulable state (INR>1.2) were observed in 4.4% and 28.9% of cases respectively but not in controls (P <0.001). Also, aPTT>40 seconds was seen in 4.4% vs 4.7% of cases and controls respectively and aPTT< 30 seconds in 22% of cases but not in controls (P =0.004). Conclusion: Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are identified risk factors not traditionally associated with DVT. These in addition to a complete blood count and coagulation tests can be useful in stratifying patients for prophylaxis in our population and other similar communities.

Guideline-based venous thromboprophylaxis in postpartum women: An in-depth evaluation of ACOG and RCOG recommendations and real-life implementation

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism is one of the most serious complications of the postpartum period, and international societies have various thromboprophylaxis guidelines for its prevention. This study compares postpartum venous thromboprophylaxis recommendations from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) with real-life clinical practices. STUDY DESIGN: Data analysis of 1000 postpartum women at a tertiary care center focused on patient demographics, venous thromboembolism risk factors, and clinical thromboprophylaxis practices. Patient-specific risk factors were compared between ACOG and RCOG guidelines, assessing Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin dosages and durations. Guideline compliance, undertreatment/overtreatment rates, and the required number of prefilled Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin syringes were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant discrepancies were observed between ACOG and RCOG guidelines, particularly in Low Molecular Weight Heparin dosages and durations. Consensus rates with clinical approaches were around 53%, with inconsistencies leaning towards undertreatment (RCOG) and overtreatment (ACOG). The number of required prefilled Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin syringes was notably higher according to RCOG compared to ACOG guidelines. CONCLUSION: Postpartum Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines from American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists exhibit substantial differences, leading to variations in clinical practice. Further research on the significance of Venous thromboembolism risk factors is essential for improving risk assessment tools and refining guideline recommendations for pregnancy-related Venous thromboembolism prevention.

Is pharmacologic venous Thromboprophylaxis necessary for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial Cancer? A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Given the low incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, coupled with the existing uncertainties within guidelines regarding pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this area, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive literature review. This review aims to evaluate the necessity of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in these patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to March 10, 2024. The analysis was performed using R version 4.2.3. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 3931 endometrial cancer patients were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis results revealed that within 30 days postoperatively, the incidence of VTE was 0.51% (5 out of 990) in the pharmacologic prophylaxis group and 0.70% (7 out of 995) in the mechanical prophylaxis group, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.14 (95% CI 0.19-6.95), indicating no significant difference between the groups. Additionally, within the same timeframe, the incidence of VTE was 0.37% (4 out of 1083) in the extended pharmacologic prophylaxis group and 1.14% (4 out of 352) in the non-extended pharmacologic prophylaxis group, yielding an RR of 0.41 (95% CI 0.11-1.54), again showing no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis may not be imperative for endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, as mechanical prophylaxis alone seems to be efficacious. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that a subset of high-risk patients may derive benefit from pharmacological prophylaxis or even extended regimens. Nonetheless, the absence of a validated risk prediction model for identifying such patients underscores the need for further research in this area. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD 42024516595.

Platelet-targeted thromboprophylaxis with a human serum albumin fusion drug: Preventing thrombosis and reducing cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injurywithout bleeding complications.

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) as a consequence of atherosclerosis-associated acute thrombosis is a leading cause of death and disability globally. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs are standard therapies in preventing and treating MI. However, all clinically used drugs are associated with bleeding complications, which ultimately limits their use in patients with a high risk of bleeding. We have developed a new recombinant drug, targ-HSA-TAP, that combines targeting and specific inhibition of activated platelets as well as anticoagulation. This drug is designed and tested for a prolonged circulating half-life, enabling unique thromboprophylaxis without bleeding complications. Methods: Targ-HSA-TAP combines a single-chain antibody (scFv) that targets activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa on activated platelets, human serum albumin (HSA) for prolonged circulation, and tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP) for coagulation FX inhibition. A non-binding scFv is employed as a non-targeting control (non-targ-HSA-TAP). Its efficacy was investigated in vivo using murine models of acute thrombosis and cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Results: Our experiments confirmed the targeting specificity of targ-HSA-TAP to activated platelets and demonstrated effective prevention of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, as well as FXa inhibition in vitro. Thromboprophylactic administration of targ-HSA-TAP subcutaneously in mice prevented occlusion of the carotid artery after ferric chloride injury as compared to non-targ-HSA-TAP and PBS-control treated mice. By comparing the therapeutic outcomes between targ-TAP and targ-HSA-TAP, we demonstrate the significant improvements brought by the HSA fusion in extending the drug's half-life and enhancing its therapeutic window for up to 16 h post-administration. Importantly, tail bleeding time was not prolonged with targ-HSA-TAP in contrast to the clinically used anticoagulant enoxaparin. Furthermore, in a murine model of cardiac I/R injury, mice administered targ-HSA-TAP 10 h before injury demonstrated preserved cardiac function, with significantly higher ejection fraction and fractional shortening, as compared to the non-targ-HSA-TAP and PBS control groups. Advanced strain analysis revealed reduced myocardial deformation and histology confirmed a reduced infarct size in targ-HSA-TAP treated mice compared to control groups. Conclusion: The inclusion of HSA represents a significant advancement in the design of targeted therapeutic agents for thromboprophylaxis. Our activated platelet-targeted targ-HSA-TAP is a highly effective antithrombotic drug with both anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects while retaining normal hemostasis. The long half-life of targ-HSA-TAP provides the unique opportunity to use this antithrombotic drug for more effective, long-lasting and safer anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. In cases where MI occurs, this prophylactic strategy reduces thrombus burden and effectively reduces cardiac I/R injury.

Enhancing thromboprophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery in China: Bridging the gap between evidence and implementation through pathway optimization.

BACKGROUND: The CRC-VTE trial conducted in China revealed a significant occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, raising concerns about implementing thromboprophylaxis measures. The present study aimed to identify and analyze inappropriate aspects of current thromboprophylaxis practices. METHODS: This study performed an analysis of the CRC-VTE trial, a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 1836 patients who underwent CRC surgery. The primary objective was to identify independent risk factors for VTE after CRC surgery using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, among the cases in which VTE occurred, the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis was assessed based on several factors, including pharmacologic prophylaxis, time to initiate prophylaxis, drug selection, drug dosage, and duration of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Based on the analysis of the current state of thromboprophylaxis and relevant clinical guidelines, a modified Delphi method was used to develop a clinical pathway for VTE prophylaxis after CRC surgery. RESULTS: In this analysis of 1836 patients, 205 (11.2%) were diagnosed with VTE during follow-up. The multifactorial analysis identified several independent risk factors for VTE, including age (≥70 years), female sex, varicose veins in the lower extremities, intraoperative blood transfusion, and the duration of immobilization exceeding 24 h. None of the patients diagnosed with VTE in the CRC trial received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The main reasons for this inappropriate practice were the omission of thromboprophylaxis, delayed initiation, and insufficient duration of thromboprophylaxis. We developed a specialized clinical pathway for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive nationwide evaluation of existing thromboprophylaxis practices in patients after CRC surgery in China. A specialized clinical pathway was developed to address the identified gaps and improve the quality of care. This clinical pathway incorporates explicit, tailored, detailed recommendations for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery.

Hospital acquired venous thromboembolism in children with sickle cell disease.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is well recognized as a hypercoagulablestate, however, it remains unclear whether a subgroup of children with SCD at higher risk of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) during hospitalization may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Our objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and recurrence of hospital acquired VTE in patients with SCD younger than 21 years. This was a single center retrospective study. Data regarding demographics, reason for admission, location of VTE, risk factors like central venous catheter (CVC), intensive care unit (ICU) admission among others were extracted from electronic medical records over a 10-year study period (2011-2021). Recurrence of VTE at 1 and 5 years was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used as indicated. We identified a total of 20 VTE events over the 10-year study period. Six of these events occurred in those younger than 12 years of age. Fourteen (70%) VTE events occurred in the HbSS or HbSßThal0 genotypes compared to 6 (30%) in HbSC. Most common VTE was isolated pulmonary embolism (PE) (n = 10, 50%). VTE were most often associated with acute chest syndrome (ACS) (n = 14, 70%), ICU admissions (n = 10, 50%) and CVC (n = 5/9, 55%). One patient died from the VTE event. One patient with additional underlying risk factors had a recurrent VTE at 13 months. Our study suggests that ICU admission, ACS and presence of CVC increases the risk of VTE in children and young adults with SCD, but larger studies are indicated to validate our findings.

Thrombotic Event Prevention in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Arthrodesis: our experiencie. A retrospective case series study. / Prevención de eventos trombóticos en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de artrodesis lumbar por vía posterior: experiencia en nuestro centro. Estudio retrospectivo de casos.

INTRODUCTION: There is no generalized consensus regarding perioperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), either on using or timing it in patients undergoing spine surgery. VTE is a current concern because, even though being an uncommon event, it can cause serious complications. The aim of the present study is to propose guidelines for the prevention of thrombotic events in posterior spinal surgery, either as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism. If the number of patients getting prophylaxis drugs is reduced a subsequent reduction of the incidence of epidural hematoma can be expected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A number of 235 patients who had undergone posterior spinal arthrodesis in the previous five years were studied. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis measures consisting of compression stockings were applied in all of them. Anticoagulant drugs were also applied whenever risk factors for thrombosis were observed. Early weight-bearing was resumed immediately after surgery. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were collected, as well as complications appearing during the follow-up period, that was scheduled at one, two, four, six and twelve months after the surgery. Thrombotic events, if present, were diagnosed by clinical and imaging tests such as ultrasound and CT angiography. RESULTS: From the total 235 patients of this series, one hundred and fifty-three cases met the study inclusion criteria. A total of four thrombotic events appeared, one in the form of deep vein thrombosis and other three in the form of pulmonary thromboembolism. These last patients suffering an embolism died because of it. None of the variables studied had statistical significance for the occurrence of a thrombotic event. All four patients who suffered thrombotic events were receiving anticoagulant drugs, in addition to mechanical compression stockings, because of the presence of risk factors for thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: By applying the fore mentioned protocol, adequate prevention of thromboembolic events was achieved in this study population of patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery.

[How to generate recommendations for venous thromboprophylaxis in health institutions?] / Cómo generar recomendaciones de tromboprofilaxis venosa en instituciones de salud.

Venous thromboembolism disease (VTE) prevention strategy has to be constantly updated based on new evidence that is generated every year. Each institution must have a formal and active prevention policy against VTE and must develop guidelines or standards for thromboprophylaxis (TP) according to the local reality. During this process of adapting a guideline to the region and the generation of hospital recommendations, we must always consider the available local resources, the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk of the patients, even after discharge, and also their considerations and preferences. Adherence to local TP recommendations is one of the most important items evaluated by organizations that measure institutional quality. Individualized prophylaxis should consider personal and family history of VTE, the use of validated risk assessment models or RAMs for thrombosis and bleeding events, as well as the special characteristics of each patient. Ideally, each center's own statistics should be available for decision-making. Extrapolating guidelines from developed countries could have a negative impact, if we ignore our hospital's reality. In this document we will find practical tools for health institutions that will allow them to prepare recommendations or guidelines for adequate VTE prophylaxis.

La prevención de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) es motivo de continua actualización en función de nueva evidencia que se genera permanentemente. Cada institución debe contar con una estrategia activa de prevención contra la ETV y debe generar normas de tromboprofilaxis (TP) de acuerdo con la realidad local. Durante este proceso de adaptación de una guía a la región debemos siempre tener en cuenta los recursos locales disponibles, el riesgo tromboembólico y hemorrágico propio del paciente, de la enfermedad por la que se encuentra internado (ya sea clínica o quirúrgica) y las consideraciones o preferencias del paciente. La tasa de adherencia a recomendaciones locales de TP es uno de los indicadores de excelencia más importantes evaluados en organismos que califican la calidad de una institución de salud. Las medidas de profilaxis que propongamos para los centros de salud, deben ser individualizadas para cada paciente, tienen que considerar antecedentes personales y familiares del enfermo y utilizar modelos de evaluación de riesgo validados de trombosis y de sangrado. También deben incluir a la población con riesgo de trombosis persistente luego del alta. Lo ideal es tener estadísticas propias de cada nosocomio para la toma de decisiones de cómo implementar una correcta TP. Extrapolar guías de los países desarrollados a nuestro ámbito podría tener un impacto negativo, si no se conoce la propia realidad. En este documento encontraremos herramientas prácticas para las instituciones de salud de la región, que les permita orientarse al momento de confeccionar recomendaciones para una adecuada TP.

Deep vein thrombosis: Implications of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb cast immobilisation.

Deep vein thrombosis is a recognised complication of lower limb cast immobilisation and post operative state immobilisation. A national survey revealed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the favoured strategy for thromboprophylaxis in the latter context. However, clinicians need to be aware of the fact that the use of LMWH might incur the risk of subsequent development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, with its attendant life-threatening thrombotic complications. Some of the patients who develop those complications might be admitted under the care of general physicians, hence the importance of raising awareness of this issue.

Feline Aortic Thromboembolism: Recent advances and future prospects.

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Feline aortic thromboembolism (FATE) is commonly encountered in clinical medicine, especially in emergency situations. This often devastating syndrome usually develops secondarily to severe heart disease, and has short- and long-term consequences. CLINICAL FEATURES: The clinical presentation of FATE is consistent with peripheral ischemic neuropathy, usually in both pelvic limbs. Diagnosis is relatively straightforward, but can be assisted with Doppler ultrasound, point-of-care ultrasound or infrared thermal imaging. RECENT ADVANCES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS: Interpretation of survival rates in cats with FATE has been hampered by historically high admission euthanasia, but recent studies suggest a survival rate with supportive care of 30-40%. Moreover, with advances in post-FATE thromboprophylaxis, median survival times of over 1 year are being achieved. Future directions include use of thrombolytic agents and treatment of common FATE sequelae such as acute kidney injury and reperfusion injury. OUTLINE: This article, aimed at small animal veterinarians, including emergency practitioners, reviews key aspects of the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment options for FATE, with a view to guiding client and veterinarian decision-making. Three case studies are included to illustrate the practical application of information presented in the review. EVIDENCE BASE: There are limited prospective studies on FATE, although the recent literature reflects a resurgence in clinical research interest in the past few years. Advances in FATE treatment will benefit many cats and it is important that research efforts continue to identify appropriate treatment modalities.

The variation of anticoagulation prescribed in foot and ankle surgery in the UK - UK foot and ankle thrombo-embolism audit (UK-FATE).

INTRODUCTION: Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) is a recognised complication of foot and ankle surgery. There are multiple possible anticoagulation treatments available in the UK to mitigate the risk of developing VTE. Our primary objective was to assess the variability of chemical anticoagulation prescribed in patients undergoing foot and ankle procedures. METHODS: This was a UK-based national, multicenter, prospective audit spanning a collection duration of 9 months on all foot and ankle procedures, carried out in 68 UK centers between 1st June 2022 and 30th November 2022, with a further 3-month follow up period. All patients who underwent a foot and ankle surgical procedure (including Achilles tendon rupture treatment) were included in this study. RESULTS: Data on a total of 13,569 patients was submitted. Following data cleansing, 11,363 patients were available for further analysis, with anticoagulation data available for 11,099 patients. There were eleven different chemical anticoagulation treatments recorded across the cohort. A total of 3630 (31.95 %) patients received no chemical anticoagulation. The patients receiving chemical anticoagulation medication could be split into 4 main groups. The most common chemical anticoagulation received was low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (6303, 84.4 % of patients receiving chemical anticoagulation). Aspirin was given in 4.1 % (308 patients), a Factor Xa inhibitor in 10 % (744 patients) and other anticoagulants (e.g. Warfarin) in 1.5 % (114 patients). The overall VTE rate in this sub analysis of patients receiving chemical anticoagulation, was 1.1 % (83 cases out of 7469). There was no significant difference seen in incidence of VTE between types of anticoagulants, when confounding factors were considered. The duration of post-operative chemical prophylaxis used by participants for most chemical anticoagulants was 6 weeks (64.50 %). CONCLUSION: There was significant variability of chemical anticoagulants reported in the study, with five different categories of anticoagulants used (including no chemical anticoagulation), and none clearly superior/inferior. The duration of anticoagulation was consistent across types of thromboprophylaxis.

Characteristics of Patients Not Receiving Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Following Foot and Ankle Surgery: Data From the Multicenter, Prospective UK Foot and Ankle Thrombo-Embolism Audit (UK-FATE).

BACKGROUND: Although the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after foot and ankle surgery is low, multiple factors influence risk for individual patients. Furthermore, there are no clear guidelines on which patients may benefit from chemical thromboprophylaxis. Our aim was to assess patients not treated with chemical thromboprophylaxis after foot and ankle surgery, and to report on their specific patient and surgical risk factors for VTE. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, national audit of patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery (including Achilles tendon ruptures) from 68 participating UK centers. The study was conducted between June 1, 2022, and November 30, 2022, with a further 3-month follow-up. Following data cleansing, 3309 patients were included who did not receive postoperative thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS: Most patients were elective cases (2589 patients, 78.24%) with ASA grade I or II (2679 patients, 80.96%), fully weightbearing postoperatively (2752 patients, 83.17%), and either without ankle splintage, or splinted in a plantigrade boot (2797 patients, 84.53%). The VTE rate was 0.30% overall (11 cases), with no VTE-related mortality. No single demographic, surgical, or postoperative factor was associated with reduced risk of VTE. However, patients who had elective or trauma surgery not involving the ankle, who were ASA grade I or II and who were weightbearing immediately postoperatively (without splinting or in a plantigrade boot) had a VTE rate of 0.05% (1 of 1819 patients), compared with 0.67% (10 of 1490 patients, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Patients not receiving chemical thromboprophylaxis had a low incidence of symptomatic VTE, although they do represent a curated group considered lower risk. Within this group we describe characteristics associated with a substantially lower risk of VTE. All patients should be assessed on an individual basis, and further work is required to substantiate our findings.

In-hospital thromboprophylaxis variation and the risk of venous thromboembolism after lung cancer surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) is a severe complication in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, because of insufficient evidence, there are no clear guidelines, and VTE prophylaxis practices vary widely. This nationwide cohort study was a comparative study investigating VTE risk in surgical departments that routinely administered in-hospital thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin compared to those that did not. METHODS: We identified all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgery in Denmark during 2010-2021. Thoracic surgery was exclusively performed in the 4 university hospitals. Three hospitals implemented in-hospital thromboprophylaxis as standard care since 2000, while the fourth adopted this practice in September 2016. VTE events were assessed at 6-month follow-up according to hospital and study period, using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach. RESULTS: We identified 9615 patients. During 6-month follow-up, a total of 190 VTE events were observed, resulting in a weighted rate of 4.5 events per 100 person-years and an absolute risk of 2.2%. There was no clear trend according to hospital site or use of in-hospital thromboprophylaxis with a 2.2% risk in the hospital not using thromboprophylaxis compared to 1.7-3.1% in those that did. CONCLUSIONS: Use of in-hospital thromboprophylaxis did not affect the risk of VTE after surgery for NSCLC, suggesting that relying solely on in-hospital thromboprophylaxis may be insufficient to mitigate VTE risk in these patients. Further research is warranted to investigate the potential benefits of extended thromboprophylaxis in reducing VTE risk in selected NSCLC surgical patients.

National Analysis of Outcomes for Adult Trauma Patients With Isolated Severe Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Following Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the association of early versus late venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis on in-hospital mortality among patients with severe blunt isolated traumatic brain injuries. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File for 2017-2021 were analyzed. The target population included adult trauma patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI). VTE prophylaxis types (low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin) and their administration timing were analyzed in relation to in-hospital complications and mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 3609 patients, predominantly Caucasian males, with an average age of 48.5 y. Early VTE prophylaxis recipients were younger (P < 0.01) and more likely to receive unfractionated heparin (P < 0.01). VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with a higher average injury severity score and longer intensive care unit stays (P < 0.01). Logistic regression revealed that VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with significant reduction of in-hospital mortality by 38% (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.94, P = 0.02). Additionally, low molecular weight heparin use was associated with decreased mortality odds by 30% (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h is associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe isolated blunt TBI, as opposed to VTE prophylaxis within 24 h. These findings suggest the need for timely and appropriate VTE prophylaxis in TBI care, highlighting the critical need for a comprehensive assessment and further research concerning the safety and effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in these patient populations.