Assessment of average femoral component rotation for balancing functionally aligned total knee replacement in varus deformity: Robotic image guidance study.

Introduction and purpose: Ensuring proper femoral component alignment post-Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for normal patellofemoral (PF) kinematics. However, the customary 3° external rotation relative to the Posterior Condylar Axis (PC Axis) may not universally apply, and the expected final femoral component rotation remains unclear in functionally aligned knees. This study examines the relation between the Transepicondylar Axis (TEA) and PC axis, known as Posterior Condylar Angle (PCA) in Indian patients along with factors influencing PCA, and the feasibility of reproducing patient-specific PCA using image-guided Cuvis joint robot. Methods: Forty patients (52 Knees) with primary osteoarthritis and varus deformity were prospectively evaluated. Native PCA was determined using CT-based J planner. Pre-operative patellar shape, PF tilt, PF shift, final femoral component rotation (representing post-operative PCA), final patellar tracking, and post-operative functional and radiological assessment at 3 months were recorded. Results: Study participants averaged 64.3 years of age, with a female-to-male ratio of 23 to 17. Varus deformities varied, with IA2 being most prevalent, and sagittal plane deformities included fixed flexion (34.6 %) and hyperextension (44.2 %). The average PCA was 1.9° (range: 0°-7.3°), with most knees (41 out of 52) below 3°. The majority had Wiberg type 1 patellae, with pre-operative patellar tilt averaging 5.63°, reducing post-operatively to 4.43°. Most patients (37 out of 40) achieved excellent Knee Society functional scores at the 3-month mark. Complications included one case of delayed wound healing and one femoral array pin breakage. Notably, our study revealed a significant deviation in PCA from the commonly reported 3° in Western literature, underscoring the need for region-specific considerations in TKA planning. Conclusion: PCA of our population is statistically different from customary 3° followed with jig system. Image guided Robotics helps to identify patients specific PCA and reproducing the same was more commonly possible in patients with reducible Varus deformity.

Evaluation of the External Rotation of the Femur Component in Functionally Aligned Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background The conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for grade 4 knee arthritis lacks individualized strategies for determining femur component rotation, contributing to suboptimal clinical outcomes and heightened patient dissatisfaction. Methods One hundred consecutive active robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) patients were retrospectively evaluated. The control group is the patients undergoing conventional TKA for grade 4 arthritis of the knee joint, where the femoral component is placed in a fixed 3-degree external rotation. The study aimed to explore the relationships between the posterior femoral axis of the functionally aligned TKA (FAA), the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA), and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Specifically, it investigated whether there is a statistically significant difference in femoral component rotation between the functionally aligned TKA (FTKA) and the conventional 3-degrees of external rotation of the femoral component used in traditional TKA (C-TKA). Internal rotation is indicated by a negative value for the femur component. A student's t-test was employed to compare mean rotation values between FTKA and C-TKA, with a p-value below 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 100 patients (male: female, 11:89) were studied. The FAA was externally rotated in relation to the TEA (mean 1.451°, SD 1.023°, p-value <0.0001). As regards the PCA, the FAA was externally rotated (mean 2.36°, SD 2.221°, p-value 0.0002). These findings demonstrate a statistically significant difference in femoral component rotation between FTKA and C-TKA. Clinically, no patellofemoral complications or premature loosening were observed at one-year follow-up. Conclusion Functional alignment TKA technique resulted in external rotation of the femur component with respect to TEA and PCA. This negates the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant difference amongst the femur component rotation implanted according to the FTKA concept with robotic assisted technology and C-TKA.

Evolution of the term "epicondyle of the femur": Revisiting the anatomical and surgical literature.

The femoral epicondyle is an anatomical bony landmark essential for surgeons and anatomists, but there are discrepancies between the two fields when using this term. In current orthopedic surgery, it commonly denotes the small bony prominence of the femoral condyle. Given the derivation, "epicondyle" should be a region projecting laterally from the articular surface rather than a point. These discrepancies in usage are found not only between the fields but also in the literature. This article reviews the narrative definition of "epicondyle of the femur" in surgery and the evolution of the term in anatomy. The outcomes of the review suggest a relationship between the differing perceptions of the epicondyle and the evolution of the term. In reports of studies related to the epicondyle, it is strongly recommended that the definition of the word is clearly stated, with an understanding of its evolution.

Femoral Neck Anteversion: Which Distal Femur Landmark Matters?

Background: Femoral neck anteversion has traditionally been measured by the angle between the distal femur posterior condylar axis (PCA) and a line drawn through the center of the femoral head and neck. While less common, the transepicondylar axis (TEA) has also been used to reference femoral neck anteversion. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral neck version of the PCA vs the TEA using computerized tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 1507 femoral CTs were included. Precise bony landmarks were established: lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, posteromedial condyle, posterolateral condyle, center of the femoral neck, and center of the femoral head. Femoral version was calculated between the head and neck axis and either the PCA or TEA. Differences between sex and ethnicity were evaluated. Results: The mean femoral anteversion was 12.7° ± 9.1° based on the PCA and 11.5° ± 7.9° based on the TEA (mean difference 1.2° ± 1.9°, P < .001). Males were less anteverted than females (9.8° ± 7.6° vs 13.5° ± 7.8°, P < .001). African Americans had less anteversion than other groups (8.1° ± 9.2° vs 11.5° ± 7.8°, P = .04), while Asians were more anteverted than other groups (12.1° ± 9.0° vs 11.2° ± 7.3°, P = .04). These values were referenced on the TEA. Conclusions: In this series of over 1500 femoral CT scans, the mean difference between anteversion measurements referencing the PCA and TEA was 1.2°. Native femoral version varied widely between gender and ethnic groups. Extreme femoral version, defined as <0° or >30°, was present in 11.8% of patients referencing the PCA.

Lateral trochlear inclination measured by the transepicondylar axis holds potential for evaluating trochlear dysplasia in patients with lateral patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: To verify that lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) measured by the transepicondylar axis can reliably be used to evaluate trochlear dysplasia (TD) on MRI and can serve as an objective indication of trochleoplasty for patients with lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). METHODS: Eighty patients with recurrent LPD and eighty healthy subjects were included. TD, posterior condylar angle (PCA), and LTI measured by the posterior condylar reference line (LTIp), surgical transepicondylar axis (LTIs), and anatomical transepicondylar axis (LTIa) were assessed on MRI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed, the correlations and differences amongst the parameters were identified, and a binary logistic regression model was established. RESULTS: Each measurement had excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement. The LTIp, LTIs and LTIa were smaller in the study group than in the control group, with mean differences of 9.0°, 7.2° and 7.0°, respectively (P < 0.001). The PCA was larger in patients with LPD than in the control group (P < 0.001). LTIp was associated with PCA in the study group (r = - 0.41, P < 0.001). The pathological values of LTIp, LTIs and LTIa were 11.7°, 15.3° and 17.4°, respectively. LTIs and LTIa were independent risk factors for LPD, with ORs of 7.33 (95% CI [1.06-52.90], P = 0.048) and 10.29 (95% CI [1.38-76.96], P = 0.023), respectively. CONCLUSION: The LTI can be reliably measured by MRI, but LTIp could potentially decrease the recorded value from the actual inclination angle. LTIs and LTIa are more appropriate to serve as trochleoplasty indications for patients with LPD, which could help orthopedists with surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Femoral coordinate system based on articular surfaces: Implications for computer-assisted knee arthroplasty.

Osteoarthritis knee can be restored by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Imageless TKA requires several anatomical points to construct a reference coordinate system to measure bone resections and implant placement. Inaccuracies in the definition of the coordinate system lead to malalignment and failure of the implant. While the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is a reliable anatomical axis to define the lateromedial axis for the femoral coordinate system (FCS), the presence of the collateral ligaments and deterioration of the medial sulcus (MS) make the registration of sTEA a challenging task. In this work, sTEA is assigned using the articular surfaces of the femoral condyles, independent of the lateral epicondyle (LE) and MS. A single 3D arc is marked on each condyle, which is transformed into a 2D arc to get the best-fit curve according to the profile of condyles. The turning point of each best-fit curve, when transformed back to 3D, defines an axis parallel to sTEA. The condyles-based sTEA is measured experimentally on a 3D-printed bone using an Optitrack tracking setup. Using the proposed method, the angle between the aTEA, sTEA, and Whiteside's line was (3.77, 0.55, and 92.72)°, respectively. The proposed method provides the same level of accuracy and improves the anatomical points registration efficiency, as there is no need to register the LE or MS.

CT scan analysis of implant mating comparing APA versus TEA in simultaneous bilateral TKA: One technique per knee.

BACKGROUND: The optimal landmark for setting femoral component rotation in primary TKA remains a debate. This study compares the Anterior-Posterior Axis (APA) versus the Transepicondylar Axis (TEA) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA, where one reference line was randomized to each knee. Implant mating was assessed via post-operative CT scans. METHOD: The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis in both knees with similar varus deformities. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure on both knees, aside from the selected femoral rotation axis line: APA randomized to one side and TEA to the contralateral. Post-operative CT scans were performed in extension to assess in-vivo mating. RESULTS: CT scan analysis showed mean rotation of the femoral implant externally rotated relative to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference between the APA and TEA groups (p = 0.28). Tibial implant rotation was also externally rotated to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference (p = 0.59). Femoral-tibial implant mating showed a mean external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur in both groups: 0.86 ± 4.0° external rotation in the APA group and 0.23 ± 3.7° external rotation in the TEA group. There was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.52). The range of mating mismatch was 15° in the APA group and 16.5° in the TEA group. CONCLUSIONS: When using a measured resection, posterior referencing technique, post-operative femoral-tibial implant mating measured by CT scan showed no superiority comparing the APA method versus the TEA method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Randomized prospective study.

Femoral Anteversion Measured by the Surgical Transepicondylar Axis Is Correlated with the Tibial Tubercle-Roman Arch Distance in Patients with Lateral Patellar Dislocation.

Background and Objectives: Various predisposing factors for lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) have been identified, but the relation between femoral rotational deformity and the tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance remains elusive. Materials and Methods: We conducted this study including 72 consecutive patients with unilateral LPD. Femoral anteversion was measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis (S-tAV), and the posterior condylar reference line (P-tAV), TT-RA distance, trochlear dysplasia, knee joint rotation, patellar height, and hip-knee-ankle angle were measured by CT images or by radiographs. The correlations among these parameters were analyzed, and the parameters were compared between patients with and without a pathological TT-RA distance. Binary regression analysis was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained. Results: The TT-RA distance was correlated with S-tAV (r = 0.360, p = 0.002), but the correlation between P-tAV and the TT-RA distance was not significant. S-tAV had an AUC of 0.711 for predicting a pathological TT-RA, with a value of >18.6° indicating 54.8% sensitivity and 82.9% specificity. S-tAV revealed an OR of 1.13 (95% CI [1.04, 1.22], p = 0.003) with regard to the pathological TT-RA distance by an adjusted regression model. Conclusions: S-tAV was significantly correlated with the TT-RA distance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.360, and was identified as an independent risk factor for a pathological TT-RA distance. However, the TT-RA distance was found to be independent of P-tAV.

Femoral anteversion measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis is a reliable parameter for evaluating femoral rotational deformities in patients with patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: To verify whether femoral anteversion measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis (S-FA) is a reliable parameter for evaluating femoral rotational deformities and to provide an indication for derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) in patients with patellar dislocation. METHODS: Ninety patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and 90 healthy individuals were enrolled. The S-FA, the femoral anteversion measured by posterior condylar reference line (P-FA), the length of posterior femoral condyles, and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) were assessed by CT images. The unpaired t test and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the parameters. The pathological value of the measurements was determined, and a binary regression model was established. RESULTS: The S-FA and P-FA were greater in the study group (14.2 ± 7.7° and 19.7 ± 7.3°, respectively) than in the control group (7.2 ± 8.0° and 12.2 ± 8.2°, respectively) (P < 0.001). The lateral/posterior condyle was shorter in patients with patellar dislocation (21.2 ± 2.5 mm) than in healthy individuals (23.5 ± 2.7 mm) (P = 0.001). The P-FA was correlated with PCA in the study group (P < 0.001). The S-FA and P-FA had AUCs of 0.734 and 0.767 for patellar dislocation, respectively. The pathological values of the S-FA and P-FA were 20.4° and 25.8°, respectively. The S-FA revealed a significant OR of 10.47 (P = 0.014) for patellar dislocation. CONCLUSION: The S-FA is a reliable parameter for identifying femoral rotational deformities in patients with patellar dislocation. DDFO is recommended when a pathological S-FA (> 20.4°) is presented. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study (diagnostic), level II.

Surgical Transepicondylar Axis Is Not a Reliable Reference when there Was Lateral Femoral Bowing.

OBJECTIVE: The surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is believed to be a consistent reference for femoral rotation axis, and the reliability of its orientation seriously affects the accuracy and outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study was designed to investigate the relationship between the orientation of sTEA and femoral bowing angle (FBA) and posterior condylar line (PCL) using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstruction models to verify its reliability. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected lower extremity images of 443 southern Chinese osteoarthritic patients (347 women, 96 men; 234 left, 209 right; mean age 66.5 ± 9.3 years) from August 2016 to June 2018. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured on anteroposterior weight-bearing full lower extremity standing radiographs. Measurements on 3D CT models of the femurs included lateral angle between the femoral mechanical axis and sTEA coronal angle, angle between sTEA and distal joint line (distal condylar axis angle, DCA); angle between sTEA and PCL (sTEA axial angle); angle between anatomical axis of proximal femur and anatomical axis of distal femur in the plane they form (actual FBA) and its projection on the coronal (lateral FBA) and sagittal (anterior FBA) planes. The correlations between sTEA coronal angle, sTEA axial angle and actual FBA, lateral FBA, anterior FBA, HKA, DCA were explored using the Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: The mean value of actual FBA is (14.4 ± 3.6)°, of lateral FBA is (6.0 ± 4.0)°, and of anterior FBA is (12.7 ± 3.0)°. The mean value of sTEA coronal angle is (88.7 ± 3.6)°, of sTEA axial angle is (2.1 ± 2.8)°. The sTEA coronal angle was positively correlated with actual FBA (r = 0.320, P < 0.01), lateral FBA (r = 0.448, P < 0.01), anterior FBA (r = 0.113, P < 0.05), HKA (r = 0.482, P < 0.01) and DCA (r = 0.486, P < 0.01). The sTEA axial angle was positively correlated with DCA (r = 0.168, P < 0.01), but not significantly correlated with all FBAs and HKA (NS). CONCLUSION: The sTEA cannot be used as a stable reference when there was an obvious femoral bowing deformity. As the lateral femoral bowing increases, the orientation of sTEA becomes more varus, no matter the knee is varus or valgus.

Could surgical transepicondylar axis be identified accurately in preoperative 3D planning for total knee arthroplasty? A reproducibility study based on 3D-CT.

BACKGROUND: Surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is frequently used for positioning of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies showed that intraoperative identification of sTEA was not reliable. While surgeons or engineers need to identify sTEA with three-dimensional (3D) computer-aid techniques pre- or intraoperatively, the reproducibility of sTEA identification on preoperative 3D images has not been explored yet. This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of identifying sTEA in preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (60 knees involved) who received TKA in our center from April 2019 to June 2019 were included in this study. Six experienced TKA surgeons identified sTEA three times on 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data. The projection angle of each sTEA and the posterior condyle axis on the transverse plane were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: The overall intra-observer reproducibility was moderate. The median intra-observer variation was 1.27°, with a maximum being up to 14.07°. The median inter-observer variation was 1.24°, and the maximum was 11.47°. The overall intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer was 0.528 (95% CI 0.417, 0.643). CONCLUSION: The identification of sTEA on a 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data may not be reliable. Combined with the previous cadaveric and surgical studies, caution should be exercised in determining femoral component rotation by referencing sTEA both preoperatively and intraoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Tibial Tubercle to Trochlear Groove Distance Measured by Posterior Condylar Reference Line on MRI Can Over-Evaluate Lateralization Deformity of Tibial Tubercle in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

Background: The tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is currently considered as an indication for tibial tubercle osteotomy. While the influence of femoral condylar morphology on such measurement remains unclear. Methods: A total of 86 patients with patellar dislocation (PD) and 86 healthy individuals were enrolled. Femoral condylar morphology and the TT-TG distance measured by anatomical transepicondylar axis (TT-TGa), by surgical transepicondylar axis (TT-TGs), and by posterior condylar reference line (TT-TGp) were assessed by MRI. Unpaired t-test, Spearman, and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. We determined the pathological value of the parameters and established a binary regression model. Results: The interclass correlation coefficients of all the TT-TG distances were greater than 0.75 in all types of trochlear dysplasia. The lateral/posterior femoral condyle was shorter and the medial/posterior condyle was longer in the study group (28.5 ± 3.3 and 35.2 ± 2.8, respectively) than in the control group (30.9 ± 2.7 and 33.5 ± 2.3, respectively). In the study group, the TT-TGp distance was greater than TT-TGs and TT-TGa distance (p < 0.001). The pathological value of the TT-TG distance was 13.0 mm. Each TT-TG distance revealed a significant OR with regard to PD. Conclusion: The TT-TGa, TT-TGs, and TT-TGp distance can be reliably measured by MRI even in patients with trochlear dysplasia. While the TT-TGp distance may overestimate the lateralization deformity of the tibial tubercle. Posterior femoral condylar dysplasia may be a reason for such overestimating. These findings have not been correlated to clinical outcomes and further studies are required.

Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Axis Versus Transepicondylar Axis in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: One Technique per Knee.

BACKGROUND: In primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the preferred reference line for setting femoral component rotation is debatable. This study compared the anterior-posterior axis line (APAL) versus the transepicondylar axis line (TEAL) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA using a measured resection technique where one reference line was randomized to each knee. METHODS: This prospective study compared the two reference lines using posterior knee referencing with a cemented posterior stabilized knee. The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis with both knees having similar varus knee deformities. All patients had the same surgical procedure with the only change being the selected femoral rotation axis line. Patients were followed up for a minimum of two years. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in any of the measured radiographic, operative, and clinical parameters, except for a postoperative radiographic limb alignment (APAL 179.7° vs TEAL 180.1° P = .04). The mean femoral external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis line (PCAL) was 3.0 degrees (0-7 degrees) using the APAL and 3.3 degrees (2-7 degrees) using the TEAL (P = .46). Two-year knee flexion and revised Oxford Knee Scores showed no difference. Seventy-five percent of patients stated no preference for either knee technique. CONCLUSION: When using a measured resection, a posterior referencing technique, we found no difference in knee function and scores when setting femoral component rotation using the APAL versus TEAL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, Randomized prospective study.

Evaluating distal femoral torsion and posterior condylar line reliability for adjusting femoral component rotation in TKA, Egyptian population radiographic study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral component rotational alignment is critical for successful TKA. The primary study objective is to measure the preoperative distal femoral torsion (DFT) of an Egyptian patient's cohort using a seated posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph. The secondary objectives are to check the intraoperative reliability of using the posterior condylar line (PCL) as a reference for rotation and to measure postoperative component rotation using the same radiographic technique. METHODS: 100 arthritic knees, 22 males, 78 females, 95 Varus and five valgus. A long anteroposterior radiograph [Hip to knee to ankle (HKA)] for coronal alignment assessment, and the anatomical posterior condylar angle (aPCA) between the anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) and the PCL was measured in the seated PA knee radiographs for evaluating the DFT and component rotation. Intraoperative rotation was adjusted to 3° external rotation to the PCL. RESULTS: HKA improved from a preoperative mean 170.4° ± 6.2 to a postoperative mean 178.3° ± 1.5 (p < 0.005). DFT was internal in all knees; the mean aPCA was -4.5 ± 2.4 (0° to -9°), femoral component rotation significantly changed to a mean aPCA of -3.6 ± 2.3 (0° to -7°) (p = 0.005). Acceptable intraoperative patellar tracking in 94%, and patellar subluxation needed a lateral retinacular release in 2% (two valgus knees). The preoperative DFT was not affected by sex or direction of coronal deformity; more external DFT noticed in severe varus deformity. CONCLUSIONS: All keens had an internal DFT not affected by sex, or coronal deformity direction. Using PCL as a guide to adjust femoral component rotation is a valid technique in our population.

Measuring stem anteversion after total hip arthroplasty: posterior condylar tangent versus transepicondylar axis.

OBJECTIVE: Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been measured using two different distal references, the posterior condyle (PC) or the transepicondylar axis (TEA). The reliability, the difference in value between these two techniques, and the possible confounding factors are scarcely known. Aims of this work were to assess (1) the intraclass correlation and the difference between the two measurement techniques and (2) the possible influence of condylar dysmorphisms on the anteversion value discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of post-THA CT scans were selected, excluding hip dysplasia, end-stage knee osteoarthritis, and replaced knees. Using a surgical planning software, stem anteversion was measured using the PC or the TEA reference. The intraclass reliability was assessed. The anteroposterior femoral condyle diameters were measured: the difference and the ratio were measured and correlated with the stem anteversion values. RESULTS: 91 CT scans were included. Inter/intra-observer TEA measurements were more reliable than PC. The intraclass correlation between PC and TEA anteversion measurements was good, 0.954 (CI 95% 0.922-0965). The mean difference between PC and TEA anteversion was 5.27 ± 2.41°. The difference and the ratio between the two anteroposterior condyle diameters did not influence the anteversion difference (respectively, p 0.797 and p 0.901). CONCLUSIONS: TEA and PC demonstrated to achieve a good correlation, not dependent from the condyle morphology. However, the difference between the two measurements (5°) can severely influence the combined anteversion (10-20%): due to clinical applicability and better inter/intra-observer agreement, TEA should be preferred for measuring stem anteversion.

Coronal shaft bowing of the femur affects varus inclination of the surgical transepicondylar axis in varus knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between femoral shaft bowing and the orientation of the surgical transepicondylar axis (TEA) in the coronal plane in varus knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 82 knees scheduled to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of varus knee OA were enrolled. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured preoperatively on anteroposterior whole-leg standing radiographs. The lateral angle between the TEA and the mechanical axis of the femur (MA-TEA) was measured in the coronal plane from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. Femoral shaft bowing was measured on CT images. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation of the MA-TEA with the HKA and femoral shaft bowing. RESULTS: The MA-TEA correlated negatively with the HKA (r = - 0.321, P < 0.01) and positively with femoral shaft bowing (r = 0.415, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The TEA changed to varus as femoral shaft bowing increased in patients with varus knee OA. This suggests that the TEA is not always the centre of the rotational axis of the femur after TKA. In addition, the TEA may not be useful as a consistent parameter in the coronal plane in patients with increasing femoral shaft bowing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Three-dimensional color map: a novel tool to locate the surgical transepicondylar axis.

BACKGROUND: Accurate localization of the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the most reliable anatomical reference for femoral rotation, has long been a challenge, primarily because it is intractable to locate the center of the sulcus of the medial epicondyle. This study aimed to introduce and verify a novel method to locate the sTEA more precisely. METHODS: This study included 26 adult femoral specimens and 80 adult patients with computed tomography (CT) scan data. Three dimensions (3D) models based on CT scans of the distal femurs were reconstructed with Mimics and imported into Geomagic Studio. The 3D color map method was applied to locate the sTEA. To further verify the accuracy of the method, the identified sTEA was transferred to the femoral specimens and compared with the points identified by the total station machine. We further compared the recognition rate of sTEA between 3D color map method and two-dimensional (2D) CT slices method. The repeatability of this novel method was also evaluated. RESULTS: The 3D color map method located the centers of the sulcus of the medial epicondyle and the most prominent point of the lateral epicondyle of all the femoral specimens, which were further identified and confirmed by patient-specific guide plates and total station machine on femoral specimens. The 3D color map method achieved a recognition rate of up to 96.23%, while the recognition rate of the 2D CT slices method was only 68.87%. The repeatability of this objective method was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that the 3D color map method could be used to accurately and objectively locate the sTEA, with high repeatability and recognition rate. However, the proposed novel method requires further validation in clinical applications.

Accuracy of a Novel 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Intramedullary Guide to Control Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most universal and effective means for treating terminal stage osteoarthritis (OA) of knee. Accurate intramedullary guide of femur is the basis for the distal femoral cuts. Determining the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is the key to reconstruction of the femoral rotational alignment, because the correct rotational alignment can place the femoral component in the right position, balance the flexion gap so that the inner and outer tension is equal, get stability during the flexion process of the knee, and enhance the quality of life of patients. With the development of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology in the medical domain, the application of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in arthroplasty has become more common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel 3D-printed patient-specific intramedullary guide to control femoral component rotation in TKA. METHODS: Eighty patients (65 females and 15 males) with knee OA were included in this prospective randomized study. The patients were divided into two groups by random number table method, 40 in each group. TKA assisted by PSI (PSI group) and conventional TKA (conventional group) was performed respectively. Clinical outcomes [operation time, postoperative drainage volume, duration of drainage, Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), American Knee Society knee score (AKS)] and radiological outcomes [hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), patella transverse axis-femoral transepicondylar axis angle (PFA), depth of intramedullary guide] were compared between and within the two groups. RESULTS: PSI group had less postoperative drainage volume but longer operation time than the conventional group (P < 0.05). The AKS and HSS scores after surgery were improved compared with those before surgery in each group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of drainage and range of motion (ROM) after surgery between the two groups. For the radiological results, the HKA and PFA were improved after surgery in both groups (P < 0.05).The postoperative PFA and PCA of the PSI group were closer to 0°, which was better than that of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The depth of intramedullary guide in the PSI group was less than the conventional group (P < 0.05). But there was no significant difference in HKA before and after surgery between the two groups as well as the preoperative PFA. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical efficacy of TKA assisted by PSI was similar to the conventional TKA. Although TKA assisted by PSI spent more time during operation, it could assist in intramedullary guide and align femoral rotation more accurately.

Different femoral rotation with navigated flexion-gap balanced or measured resection in total knee arthroplasty does not lead to different clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Femoral rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is hypothesized to vary in the same knee depending on the method used to establish it. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who underwent TKA surgery using a measured resection technique (RT) were compared with 40 patients who underwent a flexion-gap balancing technique with computer-assisted (for navigation) surgery (FB-CAS) to assess clinical and radiographic alignment differences at two years postoperatively. In 36 of the 40 patients in the FB-CAS group, both methods were used. Intraoperatively, the transepicondylar femoral rotation (TEFR) in reference to the transepicondylar axis was established as the rotation that balanced the flexion gap. Once the TEFR was obtained, an analogous rotation as measured by a posterior reference femoral rotation (PRFR) cutting guide was determined. RESULTS: Femoral component rotation determined by the TEFR and PRFR methods differed in each of the knees. The median TEFR was 0.08°±0.6° (range - 1.5°, 1.5°), and the median PRFR was 0.06°±2.8° (range - 6°, 5°). The mean difference in the rotational alignment between the TEFR and PRFR techniques was 0.01° ± 3.1°. The 95% limits of agreement between the mean differences in measurements were between 6.2° external rotation and - 6.1° internal rotation. At 2 years postoperatively, we found no differences in the radiographic or clinical American Knee Society score between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Rotation of the femoral component in TKA can vary in the same knee depending on the surgical method used to establish it. This variation in femoral rotation is sufficiently small enough to have no apparent effect on the 2-year clinical outcome score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Short lateral posterior condyle is associated with trochlea dysplasia and patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: Surgeons mainly consider the anterior anatomy of the distal femur in the treatment of patellar instability (PI) with trochlear dysplasia (TD). Through this research, the idea was to analyse the posterior femoral condyle length in TD. The research team posited the presence of morphological differences in the posterior part of the femoral epiphysis in TD compared to a control group. They also postulated that the posterior bicondylar angle (PCA), in the axial plane, was increased in TD. METHODS: This is a single-centre morphological study of 100 patients who had a computed tomography (CT) using the same protocol. 50 patients with PI (25 dysplasias A and 25 B-C-D according to the Dejour classification), and 50 controls were included. All patients presenting a clinical PI were considered for the study. None of these patients had undergone a surgical treatment prior to imaging. Demographic characteristics, BMI, and laterality were comparable in all patients. 20 pilot CT scans were used to establish the methodology. The following measurements were performed: anterior bicondylar angle, PCA, and condylar lengths with respect to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Ratios were calculated in relation to the femoral width. TD was classified according to the Dejour classification in grade A or grades B-C-D. An analysis of variance and a linear model were performed within some groups to investigate which parameters correlated with the classification's grade. RESULTS: This study showed a link between TD and the PCA: control group (1.4 ± 0.2°), type A group (1.6 ± 0.3°), and types B, C, D group (2.6 ± 0.3°) (p = 0.01). The difference between the control group and types B, C, D TD group was significant (p = 0.002). In groups B, C, D, the PCA was more important, which proves that in these groups the posterior part of the lateral condyle was relatively shorter compared to the medial condyle. The greater the dysplasia, the longer the medial condyle was in the anterior posterior (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows not only an anterior but also a posterior anomaly in PI with TD. There is a correlation between the severity of the anterior deformation and the PCA: in other words, the knee is placed in valgus in flexure which promotes the external dislocation of the patella. This anatomical study could open a field of research on the development of surgical treatments based on the correction of posterior condylar femoral anomalies in PI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.