Clinical and structural insights into the rare but oncogenic HER2-activating missense mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective ATLAS cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Unlike human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification or exon 20 insertions, missense mutations in the extracellular domain (ECD), transmembrane domain (TMD), and intracellular domain (ICD) of the HER2 protein have been implicated as oncogenic in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, their molecular subtypes, structural disparities, and clinical responses to current medical treatments, particularly HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), remain unclear in NSCLC and warrant investigation. METHODS: A real-world observational ATLAS study was conducted to gather and analyze therapeutic outcomes of chemotherapy or TKIs for heterogeneous HER2 missense mutations in NSCLC. Computational models of typical ECD, TMD, and ICD mutations were utilized to explore their structural variances. RESULTS: We screened 37 eligible patients with HER2-activating missense mutations, of which 35 patients who had received chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs as first-line therapy were available for response assessment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for chemotherapy was 4.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.77-5.10), with an objective response rate (ORR) of 26.1% (6/23) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 17/23 (73.9%). The administration of afatinib, dacomitinib, and pyrotinib, HER2-targeted TKIs, achieved a median PFS of 4.65 months, with an ORR of 33.3% (4/12) and a DCR of 83.3% (10/12). Molecular modeling and computational simulations of ECD, TMD, and ICD mutations revealed their distinct structural characteristics. CONCLUSION: In comparison to chemotherapy, HER2-targeted TKIs demonstrated similar activity and PFS benefits for HER2-activating missense mutations in NSCLC.

TURALIO® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program (tREMS): 3-year retrospective hepatic safety assessment.

Aim: Hepatic safety data assessment from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (tREMS) Program. Methods: Retrospective 3-year assessment (August 2019 to June 2022) of hepatic events from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program. Results: A total of 451 patients, 369 prescribers, 2 wholesalers/distributors and 2 pharmacies were enrolled and certified. Twenty-one (4.7%) patients met the criteria for a hepatic adverse event or laboratory abnormality suggestive of serious and potentially fatal liver injury, all with onset within 2 months of therapy. No new hepatic safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Results are consistent with the phase 3 ENLIVEN trial data. Liver enzyme monitoring, combined with early intervention, including dose modification and discontinuation, conducted in patients treated with pexidartinib mitigate the risk of potential hepatotoxicity.

Safety findings from the 3-year data collected in the TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ProgramPexidartinib (TURALIO^®) is an oral drug that is used to treat adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) that cannot be fixed with surgery. TGCTs are rare, noncancerous tumors that cause pain, stiffness and difficulty moving. Pexidartinib works by blocking a protein that helps these tumors grow. Before pexidartinib, there were no good treatments for TGCT and surgery often could not remove all the tumors, so they would frequently grow back.Pexidartinib was approved in 2019 after a clinical trial showed it worked well in adults with TGCT. However, pexidartinib can sometimes cause serious liver harm for some patients. To handle this risk, a program called the tREMS (TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) was established to ensure that pexidartinib is used safely.The tREMS Program teaches doctors, pharmacists and patients about the safe use of pexidartinib and potential liver risks and enrolls patients in a registry to watch their health. Doctors and pharmacies must be certified, and patients need regular liver tests. In the first 3 years, 451 patients and 369 doctors joined the program. Unintended liver issues were found in around 5% of patients, a rate that is about the same as that seen in pexidartinib clinical trials, and no new safety concerns were found. About half of patients with liver issues could reverse them by stopping pexidartinib. No patient had permanent liver damage, needed a transplant or died from liver problems. These results show that the tREMS Program is working well to keep patients with TGCT safe while taking pexidartinib.

Phase 3 THOR Japanese subgroup analysis: erdafitinib in advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations.

BACKGROUND: In the THOR trial (NCT03390504) Cohort 1, erdafitinib demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (median 12.1 versus 7.8 months) and reduced risk of death by 36% (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.005) compared with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients with FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥ 1 prior treatments, including anti-PD-(L)1. There have been no reports of the Japanese subgroup results yet. METHODS: THOR Cohort 1 randomized patients to erdafitinib once daily or docetaxel/vinflunine once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). No specific statistical power was set for this Japanese subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Of 266 patients randomized, 27 (14 erdafitinib; 13 chemotherapy) were Japanese. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatments and to the overall population, except for more males, lower body weight, and more upper tract primary tumors among Japanese patients. Compared with chemotherapy, erdafitinib showed improved OS (median 25.4 versus 12.4 months), PFS (median 8.4 versus 2.9 months) and ORR (57.1% versus 15.4%). Any grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients from both arms but Grade 3/4 AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower in the erdafitinib arm. No new safety signals were observed in the Japanese subgroup. CONCLUSION: In the Japanese subgroup, erdafitinib showed improved survival and response compared to chemotherapy, with no new safety concerns. These results support erdafitinib as a treatment option for Japanese mUC patients with FGFR alterations, and early FGFR testing after diagnosis of mUC should be considered.

Long acting delivery and therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) represents a leading cause of severe visual impairment in individuals over 50 years of age in developed nations. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have become the standard of care for treating nAMD; however, monthly or bimonthly dosing represents significant time and cost burden due to the disease's chronic nature and limited medication half-life. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes innovative therapeutics and delivery methods for nAMD. Emerging methods for extended drug delivery include high molar concentration anti-VEGF drugs, intravitreal sustained release devices, reservoirs for intravitreal delivery, and gene therapy biofactories. In addition to VEGF-A, therapies targeting inhibition of VEGF-C and D, the angiopoetin-2 (Ang-2)/Tie-2 pathway, tyrosine kinases, and integrins are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: The evolving therapeutic landscape of nAMD is rapidly expanding our toolkit for effective and durable treatment. Recent FDA approvals of faricimab (Vabysmo) and high dose aflibercept (Eylea HD) for nAMD with potential extension of injection intervals up to four months have been promising developments for patients and providers alike. Further research and innovation, including novel delivery techniques and pharmacologic targets, is necessary to validate the efficacy of developing therapeutics and characterize real-world outcomes. demonstrating promise in expanding treatment durability.

Stabilization of TGF-ß Receptor 1 by a Receptor-Associated Adaptor Dictates Feedback Activation of the TGF-ß Signaling Pathway to Maintain Liver Cancer Stemness and Drug Resistance.

Dysregulation of the transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) signaling pathway regulates cancer stem cells (CSCs) and drug sensitivity, whereas it remains largely unknown how feedback regulatory mechanisms are hijacked to fuel drug-resistant CSCs. Through a genome-wide CRISPR activation screen utilizing stem-like drug-resistant properties as a readout, the TGF-ß receptor-associated binding protein 1 (TGFBRAP1) is identified as a TGF-ß-inducible positive feedback regulator that governs sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and promotes liver cancer stemness. By interacting with and stabilizing the TGF-ß receptor type 1 (TGFBR1), TGFBRAP1 plays an important role in potentiating TGF-ß signaling. Mechanistically, TGFBRAP1 competes with E3 ubiquitin ligases Smurf1/2 for binding to TGFΒR1, leading to impaired receptor poly-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Moreover, hyperactive TGF-ß signaling in turn up-regulates TGFBRAP1 expression in drug-resistant CSC-like cells, thereby constituting a previously uncharacterized feedback mechanism to amplify TGF-ß signaling. As such, TGFBRAP1 expression is correlated with TGFΒR1 levels and TGF-ß signaling activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues, as well as overall survival and disease recurrence in multiple HCC cohorts. Therapeutically, blocking TGFBRAP1-mediated stabilization of TGFBR1 by selective inhibitors alleviates Regorafenib resistance via reducing CSCs. Collectively, targeting feedback machinery of TGF-ß signaling pathway may be an actionable approach to mitigate drug resistance and liver cancer stemness.

The challenge of running trials in advanced angiosarcoma: A systematic review of the literature from EORTC/STBSG to guide the development of angiosarcoma-specific trials.

INTRODUCTION: While available systemic treatments have modest long term efficacy in advanced angiosarcoma, immunotherapy represents an interesting new therapeutic opportunity. To establish its benefit, it is required to conduct a clinical trial assessing its efficacy and toxicity compared to standard treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a literature review from PubMed search. RESULTS: Several systemic treatments (chemotherapy and TKI) are currently used in advanced angiosarcoma with ORR ranging from 12.5 to 68 % and PFS from 2 to 7 months. However, few randomized trials, mainly phase II, has been conducted to compare these treatments. While most centers propose doxorubicin containing regimens or paclitaxel in 1st or 2nd line, a high heterogeneity of regimens administered in this setting is observed even across sarcoma specialized centers with no consensual standard treatment. Encouraging signals of immunotherapy activity have been reported in angiosarcoma from several retrospective and phase II studies assessing anti-PD1 either alone or in combination with anti CTLA4 or TKI. Although cutaneous and head and neck location seems to benefit more from immunotherapy, response may be observed in any angiosarcoma subtype. In sarcoma in general and AS in particular, no biomarker has been clearly established to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy: high tumor mutational burden and presence of tertiary lymphoid structures are under assessment. DISCUSSION: Even essential, developing a randomized clinical trial in AS struggles with the heterogeneity of the disease, the lack of consensual standard regimen, the uncertainty on optimal immunotherapy administration and the absence of established predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSION: International collaboration is essential to run randomized trial in advanced AS and asses the efficacy of immune therapy in this rare and heterogeneous disease.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Lenvatinib Causes Cardiotoxicity by Inducing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis through Activating ATF6, IRE1α and PERK Signaling Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can improve progression-free survival in patients with thyroid cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, it is limited by adverse cardiovascular events, including hypertension and cardiac dysfunction. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress is involved in cardiomyocyte apoptosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to confirm whether the cardiotoxicity of lenvatinib is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress by targeting the activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), inositol- requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) and protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK) signaling pathways. METHODS: Male C57/BL6 mice were intragastric administration with 30 mg/kg/day lenvatinib. Electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography were used to detect arrhythmias and cardiac function. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were treated with lenvatinib for 48h. Cell counting kit (CCK8), 2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluoresceine diacetate (H2DCFHDA), Hoechst 33258 and dihydrorhodamine 123 were respectively used for evaluating cell viability, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nuclear morphological changes and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) level. RESULTS: Lenvatinib remarkably decreased the posterior wall thickness of left ventricle during diastole and systole but caused little decrease to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, %). Furthermore, lenvatinib greatly prolonged the corrected QT interval (QTc) and altered the morphology of cardiomyocytes. No dramatic difference in fibrosis was found in mouse cardiac slices. Lenvatinib upregulates apoptosis-related protein expression. In addition, lenvatinib increased ERS-related protein expression (GRP78, CHOP, and ATF6) and enhanced PERK phosphorylation. In neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, lenvatinib markedly decreased the viability of cardiomyocytes and induced apoptosis. Furthermore, ROS production increased and MMP decreased. Similar to the mice experiment, lenvatinib caused upregulation of apoptosis-related and ERS-related proteins and increased the phosphorylation levels of PERK and IRE1α. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib-induced cardiotoxicity is associated with ERS-induced apoptosis by targeting the ATF6, IRE1α, and PERK signaling pathways.

Prediction of sustained remission after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation with BCR::ABL1 digital PCR in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Precise and reliable predictive parameters to accurately identify chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who can successfully discontinue their tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment are lacking. One promising parameter is depth of molecular response measured by BCR::ABL1 digital PCR (dPCR). The aim of this study was to validate a previously described prediction cutoff of 0.0023%IS and to assess the value of dPCR for treatment-free remission (TFR) prediction in relation to other clinical parameters. A droplet-based dPCR assay assessed BCR::ABL1 %IS prior to TKI discontinuation. The primary endpoint was molecular recurrence (MolR) by 36 months. A total of 186 patients from Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands were included. In patients with a first TKI discontinuation attempt (n = 163), a BCR::ABL1 dPCR < and ≥0.0023%IS had a MolR probability of 33% and 70%, respectively. Patients treated less than 6 years with a BCR::ABL1 dPCR <0.0023%IS had a MolR probability of 31%. After correction for treatment duration, both high dPCR value and the use of imatinib (vs. second-generation TKI) were significantly associated with a higher risk of MolR (HR of 3.66, 95%CI 2.06-6.51, p < .001; and 2.85, 95%CI 1.25-6.46, p = .013, respectively). BCR::ABL1 dPCR was not associated with TFR outcome after second TKI discontinuation, however, with the limitation of a small number of patients analyzed (n = 23). In conclusion, BCR::ABL1 digital PCR based on the cutoff of 0.0023%IS is a valuable predictive tool to identify CML patients with a high probability of TFR success after first TKI discontinuation, including patients treated for less than 6 years.

Promoting reactive oxygen species accumulation to overcome tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in cancer.

BACKGROUND: In tumor treatment, protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been extensively utilized. However, the efficacy of TKI is significantly compromised by drug resistance. Consequently, finding an effective solution to overcome TKI resistance becomes crucial. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a group of highly active molecules that play important roles in targeted cancer therapy including TKI targeted therapy. In this review, we concentrate on the ROS-associated mechanisms of TKI lethality in tumors and strategies for regulating ROS to reverse TKI resistance in cancer. MAIN BODY: Elevated ROS levels often manifest during TKI therapy in cancers, potentially causing organelle damage and cell death, which are critical to the success of TKIs in eradicating cancer cells. However, it is noteworthy that cancer cells might initiate resistance pathways to shield themselves from ROS-induced damage, leading to TKI resistance. Addressing this challenge involves blocking these resistance pathways, for instance, the NRF2-KEAP1 axis and protective autophagy, to promote ROS accumulation in cells, thereby resensitizing drug-resistant cancer cells to TKIs. Additional effective approaches inducing ROS generation within drug-resistant cells and providing exogenous ROS stimulation. CONCLUSION: ROS play pivotal roles in the eradication of tumor cells by TKI. Harnessing the accumulation of ROS to overcome TKI resistance is an effective and widely applicable approach.

Unraveling the Rare Entity of KIT D816V-Negative Systemic Mastocytosis.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare type of myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by abnormal proliferation and infiltration of different tissue by clonal mast cells. The uncontrolled proliferation and activation of mast cells trigger the release of vasoactive and inflammatory mediators, resulting in a cascade of systemic symptoms. Around 95% of SM arise from a gain-of-function mutation at the KIT gene, specifically at codon 816, which highlights its essential role in SM and makes it an attractive target for therapy. Although KIT-negative SM is exceptionally rare, the increased number of cases documented in the literature makes it an intriguing dimension of this disorder. The reported clinical manifestations of KIT-negative SM are widely variable, but many are similar to KIT-positive SM. KIT-targeted therapeutic options have been a game-changer in KIT-positive SM, however their role in KIT-negative SM remains controversial. This report aimed to further understand KIT-negative SM by presenting two cases of KIT-negative SM, one of which was responsive to KIT-targeted therapy, and analyzing reported cases in the existing literature.

Systemic Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and lenvatinib represent the first-line systemic therapy of choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Under sorafenib and lenvatinib, HCC patients have shown increasingly improved overall survival in clinical studies over the years. In contrast, data on overall survival for patients with HCC recurrence after LT under TKIs are scarce and limited to small retrospective series. In this retrospective, multicenter study, we investigated the efficacy of TKI therapy and the influence of immunosuppression in patients with HCC recurrence after LT. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from four transplant centers from Germany and Austria. We included patients with HCC recurrence after LT between 2007 and 2020 who were treated with a TKI. RESULTS: In total, we analyzed data from 46 patients with HCC recurrence after LT. The most common underlying liver disease was hepatitis C, accounting for 52.2%. The median time to relapse was 11.8 months (range 0-117.7 months). The liver graft was affected in 21 patients (45.7%), and 36 patients (78.3%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis of recurrence, with the lung being the most commonly affected (n = 25, 54.3%). Of the total, 54.3% (n = 25) of the patients were initially treated locally; 39 (85.8%) and 7 (15.2%) patients received sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively, as first-line systemic therapy. Median overall survival of the whole cohort was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.9-14.9 months) and median progression free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 2.0-9.4 months) from treatment initiation. CONCLUSION: Since history of liver transplantation is considered a contraindication for immunotherapy, prognosis of patients with HCC recurrence after LT remains poor.

Overcoming Chemoresistance in Cancer: The Promise of Crizotinib.

Chemoresistance is a major obstacle in cancer treatment, often leading to disease progression and poor outcomes. It arises through various mechanisms such as genetic mutations, drug efflux pumps, enhanced DNA repair, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. These processes allow cancer cells to survive despite chemotherapy, underscoring the need for new strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment efficacy. Crizotinib, a first-generation multi-target kinase inhibitor, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), refractory inflammatory (ALK)-positive myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and relapsed/refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Crizotinib exists in two enantiomeric forms: (R)-crizotinib and its mirror image, (S)-crizotinib. It is assumed that the R-isomer is responsible for the carrying out various processes reviewed here The S-isomer, on the other hand, shows a strong inhibition of MTH1, an enzyme important for DNA repair mechanisms. Studies have shown that crizotinib is an effective multi-kinase inhibitor targeting various kinases such as c-Met, native/T315I Bcr/Abl, and JAK2. Its mechanism of action involves the competitive inhibition of ATP binding and allosteric inhibition, particularly at Bcr/Abl. Crizotinib showed synergistic effects when combined with the poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARP), especially in ovarian cancer harboring BRCA gene mutations. In addition, crizotinib targets a critical vulnerability in many p53-mutated cancers. Unlike its wild-type counterpart, the p53 mutant promotes cancer cell survival. Crizotinib can cause the degradation of the p53 mutant, sensitizing these cancer cells to DNA-damaging substances and triggering apoptosis. Interestingly, other reports demonstrated that crizotinib exhibits anti-bacterial activity, targeting Gram-positive bacteria. Also, it is active against drug-resistant strains. In summary, crizotinib exerts anti-tumor effects through several mechanisms, including the inhibition of kinases and the restoration of drug sensitivity. The potential of crizotinib in combination therapies is emphasized, particularly in cancers with a high prevalence of the p53 mutant, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

Administering immunotherapy after anti-vascular targeted therapy improves overall survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration of the United States has approved several drugs for treating advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including anti-vascular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Options for first-line therapy include monotherapy or combination therapy. However, selecting a suitable first-line and second-line treatments to improve overall survival remains an unresolved issue. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients were divided into several grouped according to the treatment sequence of TKI and anti PD-1 administration. The overall survival benefit was evaluated based on the order of administration of anti PD-1 and TKI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective propensity-matched cohort study, we identified 135 patients with mRCC treated at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022. These patients had received anti PD-1 treatment as part of their first or second line of therapy. Statistical analysis was performed from June 1, 2023, to August 1, 2023. The primary outcome measure was OS, from the date of diagnosis to death or the last follow-up. PFS was monitored during treatment. Survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates. By comparing the complete treatment course of patients, the survival of patients in different groups was compared according to the number of immunotherapy lines. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 135 patients, of whom 84 received first-line therapy with anti PD-1 (include 6 patients treated with anti PD-1 (tislelizumab, carrelizumab, toripalimab or sintilizumab) alone and 78 patients treated with anti PD-1 combined with anti-vascular TKI (axitinib, sunitinib, solfanitinib or pazopanib)). The remaining 51 patients were treated with anti PD-1 as second-line therapy following an initial regime of TKIs. Patients were initially categorized based on whether anti PD-1 were used in the first-line treatment. It was observed that the OS of patients receiving first-line targeted therapy was higher than those receiving first-line immunotherapy, with a median OS of 33 months versus 15 months. To investigate this outcome further, we refined the patient groups based on the administration sequence of anti PD-1 and TKIs in the treatment regimen. We found that the median PFS of patients with first-line treatments of TKI combined with anti PD-1 was 3.5 months, compared to 14.5 months when TKI combined with anti PD-1 followed first-line TKI (p=0.0092). The median PFS for second-line treatments was 6.5 months versus 15 months (p=0.0014). Similarly, the median OS was 16.66 months and 31.88 months, respectively (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that administering immunotherapy following anti-vascular therapy significantly enhances both OS and PFS compared to other sequences of therapies. This finding provides valuable insights and robust data support for clinical decision-making regarding treatment sequencing.

Importance of Testing for ROS1 Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Targeted Therapy in a Latin American Country.

Purpose: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, with the optimization of screening strategies and advances in treatment, mortality has been decreasing in recent years. In this study, we describe non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed between 2021 and 2022 at a high-complexity hospital in Latin America, as well as the immunohistochemistry techniques used to screen for ROS1 rearrangements, in the context of the recent approval of crizotinib for the treatment of ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer in Colombia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Sociodemographic, clinical, and molecular pathology information from non-small cell lung cancer individuals who underwent immunohistochemistry to detect ROS1 rearrangements between 2021 and 2022 at Fundación Valle del Lili (Cali, Colombia) was recorded. The clinical outcomes of confirmed ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer patients were reported. Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients with non-small cell lung cancer were included. The median age at diagnosis was 69.8 years (interquartile range 61.9-77.7). At diagnosis, 69.8% (n = 95) were at stage IV. ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed using the monoclonal D4D6 antibody clone in 54.4% (n = 74) of the cases, while 45.6% (n = 62) were done with the monoclonal SP384 antibody clone. Two patients were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer using next-generation sequencing and received crizotinib. On follow-up at months 5.3 and 7.0, one patient had a partial response, and the other had oligo-progression, respectively. Conclusion: Screening for ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer is imperative, as multiple prospective studies have shown improved clinical outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Given the recent approval of crizotinib in Colombia, public health policies must be oriented toward early detection of driver mutations and prompt treatment. Additionally, future approvals of newly tested tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be anticipated.

EGFR-TKI-induced Factor V deficiency in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The first case report.

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is routinely prescribed as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, regardless of the presence of the T790M resistance mutation. This study reports a rare case of Factor V inhibitor detection during osimertinib therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring for coagulation abnormalities during EGFR-TKI therapy.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients undergoing treatment with tyrosine kinase-inhibitors.

This editorial commented on an article in the World Journal of Gastroenterology titled "Risks of Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus in Oncological Patients Using Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitors: Case Report and Literature Analysis" by Colapietro et al. In this editorial, we focused on providing a more comprehensive exploration of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) associated with the usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). It includes insights into the mechanisms underlying HBV reactivation, the temporal relationship between TKIs and HBV reactivation, and preventive measures. The aim is to understand the need for nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAT) and serial blood tests for early recognition of reactivation and acute liver injury, along with management strategies. TKIs are considered to be an intermediate (1%-10%) of HBVr. Current guidelines stipulate that patients receiving therapy with high or moderate risks of reactivation or recent cancer diagnosis must have at least tested hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc), and anti-hepatitis B surface antibody. Anti-HBc screening in highly endemic areas means people with negative tests should be vaccinated against HBV. Nucleoside or nucleotide analogs (NAs) like entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) form the basis of HBV reactivation prophylaxis and treatment during immunosuppression. Conversely, lamivudine, telbivudine, and adefovir are generally discouraged due to their reduced antiviral efficacy and higher risk of fostering drug-resistant viral strains. However, these less effective NAs may still be utilized in cases where ETV, TDF, and TAF are not feasible treatment options.

Survival of advanced/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Taiwan: a nationwide registry study.

BACKGROUND: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor c-KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the survival of patients with GISTs. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of advanced or recurrent GIST patients in Taiwan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled. The collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment pattern, treatment outcome, genetic aberrations and survival status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic factors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients with advanced or recurrent GISTs treated with TKIs were enrolled. All patients received imatinib treatment. Ninety-three and 42 patients received sunitinib and regorafenib treatment, respectively. The 48-month PFS and OS rates for patients treated with imatinib were 50.5% and 79.5%, respectively. c-KIT exon 9 and PDGFRA mutations were prognostic factors for a poor PFS and PDGFRA mutation was a prognostic factor for a poor OS in patients treated with imatinib in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median PFS of patients who received sunitinib treatment was 12.76 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.01-14.52). Patients with c-KIT exon 9 mutations had a longer PFS than those with other genetic aberrations. The median PFS of patients treated with regorafenib was 7.14 months (95% CI, 3.39-10.89). CONCLUSIONS: We present real-world clinical outcomes for advanced GIST patients treated with TKIs and identify mutational status as an independent prognostic factor for patient survival.

Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib and obinutuzumab in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a Japanese phase 1 study.

This report focuses on part 3 of a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT03198650) assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with treatment-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ten patients were included; median age was 68 years. With a median treatment duration of 27.2 months, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients (grade ≥3, 70%), and the most common AEs were anemia and headache (40% each). One patient had a grade 4 AE of neutropenia (the only dose-limiting toxicity). PK results suggested no marked effects of concomitant obinutuzumab treatment on the exposure of acalabrutinib. PD assessment indicated that combination therapy provided >98% Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) occupancy. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% with median duration of response (DoR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) not reached. Treatment with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab was generally safe and efficacious in adult Japanese patients with TN CLL.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives.

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Anti-PD-1/L1 antibody plus anti-VEGF antibody vs. plus VEGFR-targeted TKI as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Background: This article is based on our previous research, which was presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting I and published in Journal of Clinical Oncology as Conference Abstract (JCO. 2023;41:e16148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16148). Both anti-programmed death 1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) antibody + anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody (A + A) and anti-PD-1/L1 antibody + VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (A + T) are effective first-line therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, there lacks evidence from head-to-head comparisons between these two treatments. We conducted a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of them. Methods: After a rigorous literature research, 6 phase III trials were identified for the final analysis, including IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, COSMIC-312, CARES-310, LEAP-002, and REFLECT. The experiments were classified into three groups: A + A, A + T, and intermediate reference group. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS and PFS, odds ratio (OR) for ORR, and relative risk (RR) for all grade and grade ≥3 TRAEs were calculated. Under Bayesian framework, the meta-analysis was conducted using sorafenib as intermediate reference. Results: With the rank probability of 96%, A + A showed the greatest reduction in the risk of death, without significant difference from A + T (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65-1.04). A + T showed the greatest effect in prolonging PFS and improving ORR with the rank probability of 77%, but there were no statistical differences with A + A. A + A was safer than A + T in terms of all grade of TRAEs (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00) and particularly in those grade ≥3 (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.77). Conclusions: A + A had the greatest probability of delivering the longest OS, while A + T was correlated with larger PFS benefits at the cost of a lower safety rate.