Lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases.

Lymphopenia is a well-known side effect of radiotherapy and has been shown to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. However, the extent of lymphopenia caused by palliative radiotherapy and its effect on patient prognosis has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and to determine their effects on patients' survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis for patients who underwent palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and could be followed up for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte counts were documented at baseline and throughout the 12-week period following the start of radiotherapy and their medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were recorded. Exploratory analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for lymphopenia and its impact on overall survival (OS). A total of 282 cases that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.26 × 103/µl (IQR: 0.89-1.72 × 103/µl). Peak lymphopenia occurred at a median of 26 days (IQR: 15-45 days) with a median nadir of 0.52 × 103/µl (IQR: 0.31-0.81 × 103/µl). Long-term analysis of patients surviving for 1 year showed that lymphopenia persisted at 1 year after radiotherapy. The main irradiation site, radiation field length and pretreatment lymphocyte count were significantly related to grade 3 or higher lymphopenia. Lymphopenia was identified as a significant predictor of OS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. This study demonstrated the incidence of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and its effect on patients' OS.

Vertebral metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to viral hepatitis B: case report of 2 patients.

Bone metastases from liver cancer are rare. We report two cases of bone metastases revealing HBV-induced HCC. A 26-year-old african man presented with 4 months of low back pain in the context of general deterioration. Examination revealed a lumbar spinal syndrome and hepatomegaly. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a multinodular liver, and a CT scan of the spine revealed osteolytic lesions. Biological tests revealed a hepatic cytolysis syndrome, hepatic cholestasis and hepatocellular insufficiency. Alpha foetoprotein levels were elevated and hepatitis B serology was positive. We adopted the diagnosis of HCC of viral B origin with bone metastasis. The second case involved a 44-year-old African man admitted for 10 days with back pain. Examination revealed a spinal syndrome, paraplegia and hepatomegaly. A thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT scan revealed typical HCC lesions and osteolytic lesions on the ribs, pelvis and vertebrae. The biology revealed a biological inflammatory syndrome, hepatic cytolysis, a hepatocellular insufficiency syndrome and a cholestasis syndrome. Alfa-feto proteins were elevated and HBV serology was positive. The diagnosis of bone metastasis of HCC secondary to HBV infection was accepted.

Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year. METHODS: This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022. TRIAL STATUS: Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.

Pediatric H3K27M­mutant diffuse midline glioma with vertebral metastasis: A case report and literature review.

H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a type of high-grade glial tumor, which occurs in the midline structure and develops mostly in children. Extraneural metastases (ENM) are exceedingly rare in patients with H3K27M-mutant DMG. A 9-year-old male patient presented with a headache, nausea and vomiting. Following magnetic resonance imaging and immunohistochemical molecular testing examination, the patient was diagnosed with H3K27M-mutant DMG and received chemoradiotherapy plus five cycles of chemotherapy with temozolomide intermittently as an adjuvant therapy. The treatment resulted in a slight reduction of the tumor volume. However, 2 months later, the patient was admitted to hospital with complaints of drooping of the mouth, and waist and back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography-computed tomography revealed an unusual presentation with multiple vertebral metastases and craniospinal leptomeningeal dissemination. Following discussion between the members of a multidisciplinary medical team, the patient underwent one cycle of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and cisplatin. However, the condition did not improve and the patient died 4 weeks after the diagnosis of ENM. The mechanisms underlying the development of these rare metastases remain unclear. The present case report provides insights into the clinical characteristics and potential metastasis mechanisms of this aggressive disease and may help to elucidate new pathways for the management of ENM.

Percutaneous n-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization of cervical metastatic disease via an anterolateral approach.

Symptomatic vascular spinal metastases will benefit from pre-operative tumor embolization - percutaneous with or without adjunct endovascular embolization. However, when a transpedicular approach is not feasible, an anterolateral approach may be a viable alternative. The authors report a 57-year-old woman with prior C3-T1 instrumentation who presented with acute cord compression from a pathologic C5 vertebral body fracture related to metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The patient underwent CT-guided direct tumor embolization with 33% n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate via an anterolateral approach, followed by C5-corpectomy and anterior cervical C4-C6 fusion and plating with minimal blood loss (est. 20 cc) and a stable neurological exam post-operatively. In patients with highly vascular cervical metastatic disease who lack a viable transpedicular approach for preoperative tumor embolization, a CT-guided anterolateral approach is a viable alternative.

El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa / The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review

Introducción: Las metástasis vertebrales son un problema muy frecuente y asocian un deterioro importante de la calidad de vida en los pacientes oncológicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es determinar el encaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas mínimamente invasivas dentro del manejo de esta entidad. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus y Cochrane. Se revisaron los artículos publicados en los últimos 10 años que fueran de una relevancia y calidad adecuadas. Resultados: Tras el cribado de los 2.184 trabajos identificados inicialmente en las distintas bases de datos, se incluyeron un total de 24 artículos en esta revisión. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna es especialmente útil en pacientes oncológicos frágiles con metástasis vertebrales por la reducida comorbilidad que presentan las técnicas que se engloban en ella en comparación con la de la cirugía abierta convencional. Los avances en tecnología aplicada a la cirugía, como la navegación y la robótica, mejoran la precisión y reducen las complicaciones de esta técnica.(AU)

Background: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. Methods: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. Conclusion: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.(AU)

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa

Introducción: Las metástasis vertebrales son un problema muy frecuente y asocian un deterioro importante de la calidad de vida en los pacientes oncológicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es determinar el encaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas mínimamente invasivas dentro del manejo de esta entidad. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus y Cochrane. Se revisaron los artículos publicados en los últimos 10 años que fueran de una relevancia y calidad adecuadas. Resultados: Tras el cribado de los 2.184 trabajos identificados inicialmente en las distintas bases de datos, se incluyeron un total de 24 artículos en esta revisión. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna es especialmente útil en pacientes oncológicos frágiles con metástasis vertebrales por la reducida comorbilidad que presentan las técnicas que se engloban en ella en comparación con la de la cirugía abierta convencional. Los avances en tecnología aplicada a la cirugía, como la navegación y la robótica, mejoran la precisión y reducen las complicaciones de esta técnica.(AU)

Background: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. Methods: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. Conclusion: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.(AU)

Estrategias de tratamiento en la metástasis vertebral. Necesidad de comités multidisciplinarios desde la perspectiva del cirujano. Narración de la literatura / Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literatura

Las mejoras en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer han mejorado la supervivencia. Secundariamente también aumenta el número de estos pacientes que presentan una metástasis vertebral y el número con alguna morbilidad en relación con estas metástasis. Fractura vertebral, compresión radicular o lesión medular causan un deterioro de su calidad de vida. El objetivo en el tratamiento de las mismas ha de ser el control del dolor, mantenimiento función neurológica y de la estabilidad vertebral, teniendo presente que en muchos casos será un tratamiento paliativo.El tratamiento de estas complicaciones presenta un enfoque multidisciplinario, radiólogos, radiólogos intervencionistas, oncólogos y radioterapeutas, cirujanos de raquis, pero también Unidad de Rehabilitación o Unidad de Dolor. Recientes trabajos muestran que un enfoque multidisciplinario de estos pacientes puede mejorar calidad de vida e incluso pronóstico.En el presente trabajo se realiza una revisión y lectura de la bibliografía sobre el manejo multidisciplinario de estos pacientes.(AU)

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increases. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life.The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment.The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis.In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.(AU)

[Translated article] Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literature / Estrategias de tratamiento en la metástasis vertebral. Necesidad de comités multidisciplinarios desde la perspectiva del cirujano. Narración de la literatura

Las mejoras en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer han mejorado la supervivencia. Secundariamente también aumenta el número de estos pacientes que presentan una metástasis vertebral y el número con alguna morbilidad en relación con estas metástasis. Fractura vertebral, compresión radicular o lesión medular causan un deterioro de su calidad de vida. El objetivo en el tratamiento de las mismas ha de ser el control del dolor, mantenimiento función neurológica y de la estabilidad vertebral, teniendo presente que en muchos casos será un tratamiento paliativo.El tratamiento de estas complicaciones presenta un enfoque multidisciplinario, radiólogos, radiólogos intervencionistas, oncólogos y radioterapeutas, cirujanos de raquis, pero también Unidad de Rehabilitación o Unidad de Dolor. Recientes trabajos muestran que un enfoque multidisciplinario de estos pacientes puede mejorar calidad de vida e incluso pronóstico.En el presente trabajo se realiza una revisión y lectura de la bibliografía sobre el manejo multidisciplinario de estos pacientes.(AU)

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increases. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life.The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment.The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis.In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.(AU)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy to the spine: contouring the cauda equina instead of the spinal cord is more practical as the organ at risk.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recognized as a curative treatment for oligometastasis. The spinal cord becomes the cauda equina at the lumbar level, and the nerves are located dorsally. Recently, a consensus has been reached that the cauda equina should be contoured as an organ at risk (OAR). Here, we examined the separate contouring benefits for the spinal canal versus the cauda equina only as the OAR. Materials and methods: A medical physicist designed a simulation plan for 10 patients with isolated lumbar metastasis. The OAR was set with three contours: the whole spinal canal, cauda equina only, and cauda equina with bilateral nerve roots. The prescribed dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 30 Gy/3 fx. Results: For the constrained QAR doses, D90 and D95 were statistically significant due to the different OAR contouring. The maximum dose (Dmax) was increased to the spinal canal when the cauda equina max was set to ≤ 20 Gy, but dose hotspots were observed in most cases in the medullary area. The Dmax and PTV coverage were negatively correlated for the cauda equina and the spinal canal if Dmax was set to ≤ 20 Gy for both. Conclusions: A portion of the spinal fluid is also included when the spinal canal is set as the OAR. Thus, the PTV coverage rate will be poor if the tumor is in contact with the spinal canal. However, the PTV coverage rate increases if only the cauda equina is set as the OAR.

[Translated article] The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. METHODS: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. RESULTS: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.

[Translated article] Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literature.

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increase. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life. The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment. The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis. In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.

Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literatura. / Estrategias de tratamiento en la metástasis vertebral. Necesidad de comités multidisciplinarios desde la perspectiva del cirujano. Narración de la literatura.

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increases. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life. The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment. The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis. In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.

The role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of vertebral metastasis: A narrative review. / El papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva de columna en el tratamiento de las metástasis vertebrales: una revisión narrativa.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are a very common problem which dramatically affects the quality of life of cancer patients. The objective of this review is to address the issue of how minimally invasive surgery can play an important role in treating this pathology. METHODS: A literature review was performed, searching in the Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Relevant and quality papers published within the last 10 years were included in the review. RESULTS: After screening the 2184 initially identified registers, a total of 24 articles were included for review. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive spine surgery is specially convenient for fragile cancer patients with spinal metastases, because of its reduced comorbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Technological advances in surgery, such as navigation and robotics, improve accuracy and safety in this technique.

Recurrent glioblastoma metastatic to the lumbar vertebra: A case report and literature review: Surgical oncology.

Background: Glioblastoma is a malignant tumor, and its prognosis is as poor as 1.5 to 2 years. Most cases recur within one year even under the standard treatment. The majority of recurrences are local, and in rare cases, metastasize mostly within the centra nervous system. Extradural metastasis of glioma is exceedingly rare. Here, we present a case of vertebral metastasis of glioblastoma. Case presentation: We present a 21-year-old man post total resection of the right parietal glioblastoma, diagnosed with lumbar metastasis. He originally presented with impaired consciousness and left hemiplegia and underwent gross total resection of the tumor. Given the diagnosis of glioblastoma, he was treated with radiotherapy combined with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Six months after tumor resection, the patient presented with severe back pain, and was diagnosed as metastatic glioblastoma on the first lumbar vertebrae. Posterior decompression with fixation and postoperative radiotherapy were conducted. He went on to receive temozolomide and bevacizumab. However, at 3 months after the diagnosis of lumbar metastasis, further disease progression was noted, and his care was transitioned to best supportive care. Comparison on copy number status between primary and metastatic lesions on methylation array analysis revealed more enhanced chromosomal instability including 7p loss, 7q gain and 8 gain in the metastatic lesion. Conclusion: Based upon the literature review and our case, younger age of initial presentation, multiple surgical interventions, and long overall survival seem to be the risk factors of vertebral metastasis. As the prognosis of glioblastoma improves over time, its vertebral metastasis is seemingly more common. Therefore, extradural metastasis should be kept in mind in the treatment of glioblastoma. Further, detailed genomic analysis on multiple paired specimens is mandated to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of vertebral metastasis.

Cross-link augmentation enhances CFR-PEEK short fixation in lumbar metastasis stabilization.

Introduction: Spinal stability plays a crucial role in the success of the surgical treatment of lumbar vertebral metastasis and, in current practice, less invasive approaches such as short constructs have been considered. Concurrently, carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) fixation devices are expanding in oncologic spinal surgery thanks to their radiotransparency and valid mechanical properties. This study attempts to provide an exhaustive biomechanical comparison of different CFR-PEEK surgical stabilizations through a highly reproducible experimental setup. Methods: A Sawbones biomimetic phantom (T12-S1) was tested in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. An hemisome lesion on L3 vertebral body was mimicked and different pedicle screw posterior fixations were realized with implants from CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd: a long construct involving two spinal levels above and below the lesion, and a short construct involving only the levels adjacent to L3, with and without the addition of a transverse rod-rod cross-link; to provide additional insights on its long-term applicability, the event of a pedicle screw loosening was also accounted. Results: Short construct reduced the overloading onset caused by long stabilization. Particularly, the segmental motion contribution less deviated from the physiologic pattern and also the long-chain stiffness was reduced with respect to the prevalent long construct. The use of the cross-link enhanced the short stabilization by making it significantly stiffer in lateral bending and axial rotation, and by limiting mobiliza-tion in case of pedicle screw loosening. Discussion: The present study proved in vitro the biomechanical benefits of cross-link augmentation in short CFR-PEEK fixation, demonstrating it to be a potential alternative to standard long fixation in the surgical management of lumbar metastasis.

[Dosimetric Impact of Titanium Alloy Implant in Spinal IMRT Plan].

The purpose of this study is to establish and apply a correction method for titanium alloy implant in spinal IMRT plan, a corrected CT-density table was revised from normal CT-density table to include the density of titanium alloy implant. Dose distribution after and before correction were calculated and compared to evaluate the dose deviation. Plans were also copied to a spinal cancer simulation phantom. A titanium alloy fixation system for spine was implanted in this phantom. Plans were recalculated and compared with the measurement result. The result of this study shows that the max dose of spinal cord showed significant difference after correction, and the deviation between calculation results and measurement results was reduced after correction. The method for expanding the range CT-density table, which means that the density of titanium alloy was included, can reduce the error in calculation.

Dosimetric Impact of Titanium Alloy Implant in Spinal IMRT Plan / 中国医疗器械杂志

The purpose of this study is to establish and apply a correction method for titanium alloy implant in spinal IMRT plan, a corrected CT-density table was revised from normal CT-density table to include the density of titanium alloy implant. Dose distribution after and before correction were calculated and compared to evaluate the dose deviation. Plans were also copied to a spinal cancer simulation phantom. A titanium alloy fixation system for spine was implanted in this phantom. Plans were recalculated and compared with the measurement result. The result of this study shows that the max dose of spinal cord showed significant difference after correction, and the deviation between calculation results and measurement results was reduced after correction. The method for expanding the range CT-density table, which means that the density of titanium alloy was included, can reduce the error in calculation.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty and biopsy by unilateral and bilateral pedicle approaches for the treatment of vertebral metastasis / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective:To retrospectively compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty and biopsy by unilateral and bilateral pedicle approaches for the treatment of vertebral metastasis.Methods:From June 2020 to July 2022, a total of 82 patients with vertebral metastasis underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty and biopsy treated in Linyi Cancer Hospital were enrolled, 39 patients with 57 vertebral bodies were performed by unilateral pedicle approach (unilateral group) and 43 patients with 52 vertebral bodies were performed by bilateral pedicle approaches (bilateral group), used bone cement filling vertebral bodies after biopsy. The clinical efficacy and the positive rate of biopsy were compared between the two groups.Results:Both groups experienced significant pain relief in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score after operation ( P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operative time for a single vertebra, volume of bone cement in unilateral group were less than those in the bilateral group:(44.81 ± 13.01) min vs. (31.84 ± 11.87) min, (4.87 ± 0.92) ml vs. (4.18 ± 0.90) ml, there were significant differences ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of bone cement leakage and the positive rate of biopsy between both groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Percutaneous vertebroplasty and biopsy by unilateral and bilateral pedicle approaches are significant improvement for symptoms and functions of patients with vertebral metastasis. The clinical efficacy and the positive rate of biopsy are similar. But the former has easier operation procedure, shorter operative time and less volume of bone cement.

Left-Side Contrast-Injection-Induced Pseudopathologic Vertebral Enhancement in Oncology Patients without Venous Obstruction: A Report of Two Cases.

The appearance of sclerotic bone lesions in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans is often a significant concern for the possible presence of metastatic disease, especially in individuals with a known history of cancer. Prior research has demonstrated that in cases where patients suffer from thrombosis in major veins like the superior vena cava or the brachiocephalic vein, vertebral venous congestion can create imaging patterns on CT scans that resemble sclerotic bone metastases. However, instances of such imaging findings in patients without any form of venous obstruction are not commonly reported. In this study, we present cases of pseudopathologic vertebral enhancement observed consistently following left-side contrast injections in cancer patients devoid of venous obstruction. We aim to discuss and propose a potential mechanism for this phenomenon, drawing attention to a less commonly recognized diagnostic consideration in oncological imaging.