Prevalence, Indications, and Complications of Conversional Surgery After Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: A MBSAQIP Analysis.

PURPOSE: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was once the most popular bariatric procedure in the 1980's, with many patients subsequently requiring conversional surgery. However, knowledge regarding the prevalence and outcomes of these procedures remains limited. This study aims to determine the prevalence, indications, rate of 30-day serious complications, and mortality of conversional surgery after VBG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database from 2020 to 2022 was conducted. Individuals undergoing conversional or revisional surgery after VBG were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day serious complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of 716 VBG conversions, the common procedures included 660 (92.1%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 56 (7.9%) sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The main indication for conversion was weight gain for RYGB (31.0%) and for SG (41.0%). RYGB had longer operative times than SG (223.7 vs 130.5 min, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, serious complications were higher after RYGB (14.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.2). Leak rates were higher after SG (5.4 vs 3.5%) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Mortality was similar between RYGB and SG (1.2 vs 1.8%, p = 0.7). Multivariable regression showed higher body mass index, longer operative time, previous cardiac surgery and black race were independently associated with serious complications. Conversion to RYGB was not predictive of serious complications compared to SG (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.34-2.67, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Conversional surgery after VBG is uncommon, and the rate of complications and mortality remains high. Patients should be thoroughly evaluated and informed about these risks before undergoing conversion from VBG.

Resultados cardiometabólicos de largo plazo tras cirugía bariátrica: control de comorbilidades, pérdida y reganancia de peso a los 5 años de seguimiento / Long-term cardiometabolic results after bariatric surgery: Control of comorbidities, weight loss and regain at 5 years of follow-up

Introducción. La cirugía bariátrica y metabólica (CBM) es efectiva en lograr pérdida de peso a corto plazo. Sin embargo, existe evidencia limitada en desenlaces clínicos y metabólicos a largo plazo. Métodos. Estudio longitudinal retrospectivo con pacientes llevados a baipás gástrico en Y de Roux (BGYR) o gastrectomía en manga (MG) por laparoscopia en Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, entre 2013 y 2021. El cambio de peso, control de comorbilidades y resultados metabólicos se recopilaron al inicio del estudio, 3, 6 y 12 meses después de cirugía, y anualmente hasta el quinto año. Las tasas de control de comorbilidades se evaluaron mediante la prueba Kaplan-Meier. Se utilizó un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para evaluar el efecto de covariables en la reganancia de peso. Resultados. De 1092 pacientes con CBM (71,4 % MG y 28,6 % BGYR), 67 % eran mujeres, con mediana de edad 48 años e índice de masa corporal de 35,5 Kg/m2. Después de cinco años de seguimiento, la tasa de control en diabetes mellitus fue 65,5 %, en hipertensión 56,6 % y en dislipidemia 43,6 %. La tasa de reganancia de peso fue 28 %, sin diferencias entre MG vs BGYR (p=0,482). El tiempo promedio hasta peso nadir fue 14 meses. La edad al momento de CBM fue el mejor predictor independiente de reganancia (HR=1,02, IC95% 1,01-1,04), pero con efecto clínico modesto. Conclusión. La CBM es segura y muestra beneficios a largo plazo en la pérdida de peso y control de comorbilidades en población colombiana.

Introduction. Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has shown its efficacy in achieving short-term weight loss. However, there is limited evidence regarding long-term clinical and metabolic outcomes. Methods. Retrospective longitudinal study with patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) interventions in Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2021. Weight change, comorbidity control, and metabolic outcomes were collected at the onset, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-surgery, and annually up to the fifth year. Comorbidity control rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of covariates on weight regain. Results. Of 1092 patients with BMS (71.4% SG and 28.6% RYGB), 67% were women, with a median age of 48 years, BMI 35.5 kg/m2. After five years of follow-up, the control rate in diabetes mellitus was 65.5%, in hypertension 56.6%, and dyslipidemia 43.6%. The weight regain rate was 28% with no differences between SG vs RYGB (p=0.482). The mean time to nadir weight was 14 months. Age at the time of BMS was the best independent predictor of weight regain (HR=1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.04), but with a modest clinical effect. Conclusion. BMS is safe and shows long-term benefits in weight loss and control of comorbidities in Colombian population.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastro-gastrostomy Using Lumen Apposing Metal Stent for Management of High-Grade Gastric Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Vertical Banded Gastroplasty.

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is associated with an increased risk of pouch stricture secondary to narrowing of the banded gastroplasty outlet. We describe a case of a 60-year-old male with stage 4 small cell lung cancer presenting with recurrent gastric outlet obstruction secondary to stenosis at the site of VBG. Given a prior history of failed standard endoscopic maneuvers including balloon dilation and steroid injection, the decision was made to create an endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastro-gastrostomy using lumen opposing metal stent. The patient did well post procedure and was able to tolerate a soft mechanical diet within 24 h. He was subsequently discharged to hospice for his advanced metastatic disease.

Laparoscopic Conversion of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Gives Better Result Compared to an Open Approach.

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has a relatively high failure rate in the long run, requiring revisional surgery in 30-65%. A common conversion option is to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), which can be performed laparoscopically or open. Current literature contains small cohorts and inconclusive results. Therefore, we set out to compare our series of open and laparoscopic VBG to RYGB conversions. METHODS: All conversions performed between 1996 and 2020 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on conversion indication: weight recurrence (group 1), excessive weight loss (group 2), and eating/pouch difficulties (group 3). The primary outcome was postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. Secondary outcome was %total weight loss (%TWL) 1 to 5 years after revisional surgery. RESULTS: We included 205 patients (84.9% female) of whom 105 underwent laparoscopic and 100 open VBG to RYGB conversion. Twenty-three short-term complications occurred in the laparoscopic group, with 16 > CD3a. In the open group, 33 complications occurred with 12 > CD3a. Overall complications were 33.3% in laparoscopic and 64% in open patients. There were no significant differences between the laparoscopic and open group in BMI (p = 0.76) and %TWL (p = 0.694) after 5 years. After 5 years, lost to follow-up was 97% in the open group. Twenty-eight percent of patients who reached follow-up in the laparoscopic group had available data. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that the overall complication rate is lower in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group. Regarding BMI, an improvement was achieved in both groups after 5 years.

How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTIONS: Revision surgery because of weight recurrence is performed in 2.5-33% of primary vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and gastric band (GB) cases. These cases qualify for revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2008 to 2019. A stratification analysis and multivariate logistic regression for prediction modeling compared the possibility of sufficient % excess weight loss (%EWL) ≥ 50 or insufficient %EWL < 50 between three different RRYGB procedures, with primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB) as the control during 2 years of follow-up. A narrative review was conducted to test the presence of prediction models in the literature and their internal and external validity. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients underwent PRYGB, and 338 underwent RRYGB after VBG, LSG, and GB, and completed 2 years of follow-up. Overall, 32.2% of patients after RRYGB had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to 71.3% after PRYGB (p ≤ 0.001). The total %EWL after the revision surgeries for VBG, LSG, and GB was 68.5%, 74.2%, and 64.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). After correcting for confounding factors, the baseline odds ratio (OR) or sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after PRYGB, LSG, VBG, and GB was 2.4, 1.45, 0.29, and 0.32, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Age was the only significant variable in the prediction model (p = 0.0016). It was impossible to develop a validated model after revision surgery because of the differences between stratification and the prediction model. The narrative review showed only 10.2% presence of validation in the prediction models, and 52.5% had external validation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 32.2% of all patients after revisional surgery had a sufficient %EWL ≥ 50 after 2 years, compared to PRYGB. LSG had the best outcome in the revisional surgery group in the sufficient %EWL group and the best outcome in the insufficient %EWL group. The skewness between the prediction model and stratification resulted in a partially non-functional prediction model.

[Revision of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2 Years of Follow-Up].

BACKGROUND: Due to weight regain and GIT symptoms associated with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), revisional surgery is necessary. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the best options as a revision procedure but comes with a high complication rate. METHODS: This prospective study included 80 patients undergoing RYGB surgery at Ain Shams University Hospitals after failed VBG surgery, with up to 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent RYGB correction after VBG. The mean age was 42 ± 6.45 (39-58) years and the mean preoperative body mass index was 45.46 ± 4.135 (38-55) kg/m2. The median length of hospital stay for the patients was 4.78 ± 1.84 days. The early postoperative complication rate was 8.7% and the reoperation rate within 30 days was 3.75%, with no mortality. Leakage and bowel injury were detected in 2 patients. After an average follow-up of 2 years, the percentage of EWL was 64.47 ± 19.3, and complete resolution of VBG-related GIT symptoms was achieved in approximately all patients. Late complications occurred in 7.5% of patients, of whom 3.75% required surgery. CONCLUSION: Conversion to RYGB is feasible with a limited short-term complication and reoperation rate; long-term results show a nearly complete resolution of VBG-related symptoms and a statistically significant positive impact on weight loss.

Short-Term (30-Day) Morbidity of Biliopancreatic Diversion Compared to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as Revisional Procedures for Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) are associated with a high failure rate due to weight regain and complications at long-term follow-up. Consequently, surgical correction for such procedures is warranted. Controversy exists as to which surgical procedure is the ideal choice for such correction. Our aim is to compare short-term outcome of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) repair for failed VBG/SRVG bariatric procedures. METHODS: The medical records of patients with failed SRVG who underwent corrective procedures at our institute between 2004 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients characteristics, surgical approaches, and intraoperative and post-operative complications were examined and compared. RESULTS: Sixty patients in total underwent a surgical corrective procedure for failed SRVG. Thirty-one patients underwent RYGB, and 29 patients underwent BPD. Major complications were seen more in the RYGB group (35% = 11) compared to the BPD (6.9% = 2). Even though anastomotic leak rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.053), an apparent tendency for such a complication was noted in the RYGB group. RYGB procedure had an increased 30-day complication rate (p = 0.055) compared to RYGB. Laparoscopic approach had statistically fewer complications than open approach. No mortality was observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that BPD is a safe option with less complication rates than RYGB in the short-term period for surgical correction of failed VBG/SRVG procedures.

Baipás gástrico versus manga gástrica para el controlde diabetes tipo 2 en pacientes obesos / Gastric bypass versus gastric sleeve for the management of type 2 diabetes in obese patients

Introducción. La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y la obesidad son enfermedades con alta prevalencia, gran morbi-mortalidad y elevados costos en salud. La cirugía bariátrica ha demostrado efectividad para inducir pérdida de peso y un control adecuado de la glicemia. Métodos. Estudio observacional analítico retrospectivo, realizado entre 2014 y 2019 en una institución de alta complejidad. Se incluyeron pacientes prediabéticos y diabéticos sometidos a cirugía bariátrica tipo baipás gástrico en Y-de-Roux o manga gástrica. Se analizaron la mejoría o resolución de la diabetes y la pérdida del exceso de peso a los 6, 12, 24 y 36 meses luego de la cirugía. Resultados. Se incluyeron 103 pacientes en el estudio, 45 pacientes diabéticos y 58 pacientes prediabéticos. La única variable perioperatoria con diferencia estadísticamente significativa fue el tiempo quirúrgico mayor en el baipás (70 vs. 47,5 minutos; p<0,001). La pérdida de exceso de peso fue mayor en el baipás. Los pacientes diabéticos sometidos a baipás tuvieron un mayor porcentaje de resolución o control comparados con los sometidos a manga gástrica. En los pacientes prediabéticos hubo resolución en ambos grupos luego de 24 meses de seguimiento. Conclusión. El baipás gástrico y la manga gástrica presentan excelentes resultados en cuanto a pérdida de peso y control metabólico en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y prediabetes, pero en nuestros pacientes se lograron resultados superiores en ambos aspectos con el baipás gástrico

Introduction. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity are diseases with high prevalence, high morbidity and mortality and high health costs. Bariatric surgery has proven effective in inducing weight loss and adequate glycemic control. Methods. Retrospective analytical observational study conducted between 2014 and 2019 in a high-complex institution. Prediabetic and diabetic patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or gastric sleeve were included; analyzing the improvement or resolution of diabetes and the loss of excess weight at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Results. One-hundred and three patients were included in the study, 45 diabetic patients and 58 pre-diabetic patients. The only perioperative variable with a statistically significant difference was the longer surgical time in the bypass (70 vs. 47.5 min; p<0.001). Loss of excess weight was always greater in bypass. Diabetic patients who underwent bypass had a higher percentage of resolution or control compared to those who underwent the sleeve procedure. In pre-diabetic patients, there was 100% resolution in both groups after 24 months of follow-up. Conclusion. Gastric bypass and gastric sleeve present excellent results in terms of weight loss and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes, but superior results in both aspects were achieved with the first technique in our patients

A novel approach to the removal of a silastic band via the peroral endoscopic tunneling-silastic bandectomy technique.

Video 1The peroral endoscopic tunneling-silastic bandectomy technique to remove a silastic band causing a vertical banded gastroplasty stenosis. This method is a viable alternative to surgical removal of foreign bodies outside the gastrointestinal lumen.

Comparison of 5-Year Follow-up Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypasses After Open Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: an Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is associated with high weight regain; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is used as a revision procedure in patients with VBG experiencing weight regain. This study compared the 5-year follow-up outcomes of primary (PRYGB) and revision RYGB after VBG (RRYGB). METHODS: Patients who underwent PRYGB or RRYGB after VBG from 2008 to 2016 were enrolled. Data on weight regain, weight loss (WL), food tolerance (FT), early and late complications, and resolution or improvement in associated medical conditions were analyzed. RESULTS: PRYGB and RRYGB groups had 558 and 156 patients, respectively, after exclusion of the lost to follow-up patients. PRYGB group showed significantly lower mean body mass index (over the entire follow-up period), early complications, reintervention rates for late complications, and overall reintervention rates than that of the RRYGB group. On the other hand, FT scores, odds of late complications, and improvements (in the fifth year) in associated medical conditions were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RRYGB in patients with VBG who regained weight showed comparable safety and resolution of associated diseases to that of PRYGB over the 5-year follow-up period. The WL in the RRYGB group was acceptable despite being less than that of the PRYGB group. FT was better after RRYGB than that of PRYGB in the first year; however, both were comparable at the fifth year follow-up. Patients with VBG undergoing RYGB should receive attentive treatment and evaluation of associated factors.

Gastric Remnant Mucocele after Conversion of Vertical Band Gastroplasty to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Video Vignette.

Conversional bariatric surgery is a challenging procedure to patients as well as the surgeon. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a known safe conversional procedure after primary restrictive weight loss surgeries such as vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). A very rare reported complication after these operations is the formation of mucocele of gastric remnant during pouch creation. This is a video report of diagnosis and management of gastric remnant mucocele after conversion of VBG to OAGB.

Revisional Surgery from Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Gastric Resection.

Introduction: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was a common bariatric procedure by laparotomy and or at the beginning of the laparoscopy, but nowadays it is almost an abandoned procedure. However, the young generation of bariatric surgeons should be aware about this procedure especially for revisional cases. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the procedure of choice for the revision of VBG. Materials and Methods: The evolution of revisional surgery to RYGB has known several technical steps. At the beginning, the procedure was performed with no gastric resection. Then a limited resection of the ancient staple line along with the fibrous tissue under the previous band or mesh was performed. The purpose of this article is to describe a simplified operative technique to simultaneously resect the ancient staple line and the calibration band. Results: After the initial viscrerolysis, an attempt to distinguish the course of the ancient section line of the stomach during the VBG is done. The dissection can become extremely challenging, with too much fibrosis and nonanatomical planes of dissection. At this point, we counsel to abandon the anterior direct dissection of the upper part of the stomach and to switch to a posterior dissection with the approach of greater curvature. Driven by the potential advantages (no risk of mucocele or gastrogastric fistula), for the past several years, we have changed the technique from resecting only the ancient staple line to perform a partial gastrectomy. The gastrectomy is larger and includes the complete resection of the gastric fundus, ancient staple line, the region with the mesh inside, and part of the gastric body. Once the stomach is extracted, the subsequent steps are similar to those of a primary RYGB. Conclusion: The procedure of choice for the revision of VBG is represented by RYGBP. Associating an atypical gastrectomy of the previous staple line with the region of mesh migration is a safe approach, eliminating the risk of mucocele.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), bariatric surgery appears to be more effective than medical treatment (MT) at improving glycaemic control and decreasing cardiovascular risk. However, long-term effectiveness has not been systematically assessed using randomised controlled trials. In this study, we aimed to systematically assess randomised controlled trials, with at least 5 years of follow-up, on bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, as well as to compare different bariatric procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different procedures and MT in terms of full T2DM remission, weight loss, complications and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and CINeMA. RESULTS: We included 11 primary studies. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) was found to be one of the most effective treatments for full remission of T2DM (I2 = 0, inconsistency p value = 0.9223). Biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch was found to be more effective than laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding regarding percent total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein change. Regarding percent high-density lipoprotein and weight change, all analysed surgical treatments were shown to be more effective than MT. The confidence rating in our results was overall moderate, but most studies had high risk of performance and detection bias. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery seems to be effective for T2DM remission. LOAGB appears to be a good option in this context, and a possible alternative to laparoscopic duodenal switch, but the included primary studies in our review are not sufficiently powered to establish a more definitive conclusion. More studies with longer follow-up times are needed to comprehensively assess bariatric surgery in T2DM.

Endoscopic revision for weight regain after open vertical-banded gastroplasty.

Video 1Technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic approach to treating weight regain after open vertical-banded gastroplasty using an endoscopic suturing device.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: 2-Year Follow-up of 102 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is now discarded from being a restrictive procedure for morbid obesity due to its many drawbacks, doubtful efficacy, and lots of post-operative complications. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed procedure for VBG revision. So we aimed at reporting our experience in conversional RYGB for a failed VBG. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analyzing follow-up records of 102 patients who underwent revisional RYGB after failed VBG in the period from April 2014 to January 2018. RESULTS: A total of 102 laparoscopic revisions of failed VBGs to RYGB were performed. The mean operating time was 161.9 min ±29.2 and the mean length of the hospital stay was 1.5 days ±1.2. Fourteen patients (13%) developed early post-operative complications (gastrojejunostomy leak 5; bleeding 9). Four patients (4.7%) developed late complications (Port site hernia 2; internal hernia 1; Stomal ulcer 1). The mean BMI pre-RYGB was 46.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2, and the mean %EBWL (percent excess body weight lost) of the patients at 12 and 24 months post-revision were 56.2% and 64.3%, respectively. Our patients had immediate post-revision resolution of VBG-related complications like dysphagia and vomiting. We also report improvement in all obesity-related health problems with (75.7%) complete remission rate and (24.3%) partial remission or improvement rate of diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Conversion of VBG to RYGB is a feasible procedure and is associated with acceptable early morbidity rates and reduced lengths of hospitalization also it provides acceptable weight loss and improvement in obesity-related health problems. Graphical Abstract.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Stented Gastro-Gastrostomy for Strictured Vertical Banded Gastroplasty.

Herein, we make a video presentation of an endoscopic reversal of a strictured vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), carried out through an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided transluminal therapy system, in order to accurately identify the common gastric wall and to allow the application of an endoscopic stent. The operative time was 60 min, and no intraoperative complication was recorded. On postoperative day 1, an upper GI swallow showed the oral contrast easily flowing into the body of the stomach throughout the stent. A semi-solid diet was started on day 1. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 2. At the 3-month follow-up visit, the patient denied further symptoms. The follow-up upper GI swallow and endoscopy showed a patent gastro-gastrostomy and no residual gastric pouch dilation or stagnation of the oral contrast, and the stent was therefore removed. Gastro-gastrostomy by endoscopic stenting appears to be an effective option to relief symptoms in strictured VBG, and EUS guidance has made access to the target structure easier and safer.

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Revision to Gastric Bypass Leads to Effective Weight Loss and Comorbidity and Dysphagia Symptom Resolution.

PURPOSE: Up to 50% of patients with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) experience failure or complications in the mid- and long-term and present for revisional bariatric surgery. This study aimed to review our experience for patient outcomes after VBG revisions and compare their benefits to those of primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent VBG revision between 2009 and 2015 at a center of excellence were reviewed. Patient demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, weight loss, reinterventions, reoperations, and hospital stay were analyzed and compared with those of primary LRYGB patients (control group). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (88.5% female, 55 ± 9.6 years old) underwent revisional surgery during the study period (86.5% LRYGB, 11.5% VBG reversal, and 2% sleeve gastrectomy). Patients presented 17.3 ± 7.2 years after their VBG for weight regain (55.8%), dysphagia (19.2%), or both (25%). Patients who underwent conversion to LRYGB for weight regain and for mix-symptoms had similar weight loss to the control group (38.2 ± 11.8 vs 35.6 ± 7.7, p = 0.108), along with similar comorbidity resolution. However, even though the early (< 30 days) complication rate was similar between the two groups, the conversion group had higher 4-year reoperation rate (29% vs 9.5%, p < 0.001) and length of stay (5.4 ± 5.3 vs 2.6 ± 3.1, p < 0.001). Additionally, dysphagia resolved in all the patients of our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: VBG conversion to LRYGB leads to significant weight loss, resolution of dysphagia, and comorbidities similarly to the primary LRYGB operations. However, higher mid-term complication rates should be expected.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Double Fistulo-Jejunostomy for Chronic Gastric Leaks After Converted Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: As laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming the most popular bariatric procedure worldwide, treatment options for managing complications, in particular gastric leaks, are also emerging. Staple line leak is a major short-term complication of the procedure. Patients with persistent gastric leaks after failure of endoscopic and radiologic management are candidates for salvage surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y fistulo-jejunostomy (RYFJ) represents a surgical option to treat persistent gastric leak post-LSG. METHODS: We present the case of a 55-year-old woman undergoing laparoscopic double RYFJ for persistent gastric leaks after complicated bariatric surgery. The patient developed two chronic gastric leaks (gastro-esophageal and cardial localizations) following conversion to sleeve gastrectomy for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. With the two leaks being refractory to endoscopic treatment 6 months later after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, salvage surgery was proposed. Surgery was performed laparoscopically, the gastric leak orifices were identified after careful dissection, and a double RYFJ was successfully completed. RESULTS: Postoperative course was uneventful. The patient remains in good health 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Double LRYFJ for chronic leaks after complicated bariatric procedures seems safe with good postoperative outcomes. However, it remains a challenging procedure and should be reserved for selected patients in specialized bariatric centers.