ABO blood group and risk of malaria during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The association between the ABO blood group and the risk of malaria during pregnancy has not been clearly established. The present study summarised relevant knowledge and reassessed the association through meta-analysis. Articles in MEDICINE and PubMed published before 30 November 2021 were searched. Five studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the meta-analysis. It was shown that primiparae with different ABO blood group, multiparae with blood group A and non-A, AB and non-AB had a comparable risk of malaria. However, multiparae with blood group B had a significantly higher risk than non-B group [odds ratio (OR) = 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) was 1.01 to 1.50, P = 0.04], while multiparae with blood group O had a significantly lower risk than non-O group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI was 0.63 to 0.97, P = 0.03). Therefore, the ABO blood group may not result in a different risk of malaria in primiparae. Blood group B is potentially a risk factor while blood group O is a protective factor for multiparae.

Association of ABO blood groups with ovarian reserve, and outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: There has been an interest in the relationship between ABO blood groups and infertility. Many studies have investigated the association of ABO blood groups with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART), with controversial results. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluating the association of ABO blood groups with DOR, OHSS, and outcomes of ART. RESULTS: Thirteen studies performed between 2010 and 2018 were included in this meta-analysis. DOR, OHSS, live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate (MR) were reported in 9, 2, 4, 3, 2 studies, respectively. The combined results showed similar risk of DOR among individuals with blood group A (RR, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85, 1.13), B (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76, 1.20), AB (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76, 1.30), and non-O (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79, 1.11) as compared to those with blood group O. Meta-analysis showed that the incidences of OHSS were similar in women with blood group A (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66, 1.66), B (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.46, 2.35), AB (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.10, 2.56), non-O (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.65, 1.57) with blood group O. As to the clinical outcomes, meta-analysis showed no difference in LBR among individuals with blood group A (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.74, 2.17), B (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.95, 2.29), AB (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.76, 2.90), non-O (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.83, 1.98) when compared to those with blood group O. Similarly, the results also found that there were no difference in CPR and MR between women with blood A (CPR: RR, 1.12), B (CPR: RR, 1.08), AB (CPR: RR, 1.05), non-O (CPR: RR, 1.05; MR: RR, 0.94) and blood group O. CONCLUSIONS: ABO blood groups may not be associated with DOR, OHSS, LBR, CPR, and MR of ART. Infertility and ART outcomes are influenced by multiple factors. Blood groups should not be taken into account excessively during diagnosis and treatment of infertile women.

Association between ABO blood group status and cochlear/neural function: auditory brainstem response findings.

BACKGROUND: ABO blood group status may be a risk factor for some diseases, including hearing loss. Individuals with blood group O show a higher prevalence of hearing loss after industrial noise exposure. Group O individuals with normal hearing show reduced amplitudes in otoacoustic emission recordings. Whether blood group status affects auditory brainstem responses (ABR), which reflect cochlear hair cell and auditory nerve bioelectric activity, is unclear. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To compare cochlear and peripheral neural function across ABO blood groups by recording cochlear microphonic (CM) and wave I ABR responses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty normal-hearing young adults, with 15 participants from each blood group, completed 70 dB nHL click stimulus ABR measures. CM amplitude, wave I amplitude and wave I latency data were obtained for both ears. One-way ANOVA tests compared results across the ABO groups. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference for wave I peak-to-peak amplitudes across the four groups was found. Post-hoc comparisons revealed group O had significantly reduced wave I amplitudes compared to group A participants. A consistent trend of reduced CM amplitudes and prolonged wave I latencies was shown in group O participants. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Emerging evidence exists that ABO blood group status may influence auditory function.

Blood Type Is Not Associated with Changes in Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Response to a Plant-Based Dietary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Risk of cardiovascular disease is lower in individuals with blood type O and increased in individuals with blood type A, compared with those in other blood groups. However, little evidence is available regarding whether individuals with different blood types benefit from different diet recommendations. OBJECTIVE: As part of a larger intervention trial using a low-fat vegan diet, this study ascertained whether changes in cardiometabolic outcomes were associated with ABO blood type. DESIGN: A secondary analysis among intervention-group participants in a 16-week randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: In a larger study of overweight individuals randomly assigned to follow a low-fat vegan diet or to make no diet changes for 16 weeks, ABO blood typing was conducted on 68 intervention-group participants. INTERVENTION: Intervention-group participants were asked to follow a low-fat vegan diet and attend weekly educational classes to aid in diet adherence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body weight, fat mass, visceral fat volume, blood lipid levels, fasting plasma glucose levels, and glycated hemoglobin concentrations. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Student t tests compared participants with blood type A to all other participants, and individuals with blood type O to all other participants. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in any outcome between individuals of blood type A and all other participants, or between individuals of blood type O and all other participants. Mean body weight change was -5.7 kg for blood type A participants and -7.0 kg for all other participants (P = 0.09), and was -7.1 kg for type O participants and -6.2 kg for all other participants (P = 0.33). Mean total cholesterol decreased 17.2 mg/dL in the type A group and 18.3 mg/dL for all other participants (P = 0.90), and decreased 17.4 mg/dL among type O participants and 18.4 mg/dL for all other participants (P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Blood type was not associated with the effects of a plant-based diet on body weight, body fat, plasma lipid concentrations, or glycemic control.

ABO blood group should be considered and reported when red blood cell exchange transfusion is used to treat Plasmodiumfalciparum Malaria patients.

Laboratory and epidemiologic studies have clarified how persons born with malaria-resistant red blood cells (RBCs)-like group-O, sickle-trait, and C-trait RBCs-are protected against death or severe disease due to Plasmodiumfalciparum (Pf) infection. Compared to malaria-promoting RBCs-like non-O or hemoglobin-AA RBCs-inborn RBC protection against severe Pf malaria can be profound: up to 10-fold greater. Given that "the Berlin patient" success showed patients do not have to be born with disease-resistant cells to benefit from them, why have the biologically plausible benefits of exchange transfusion (ET) of malaria-resistant RBCs not yet been evaluated? Unfortunately, a 2013 ET-for-malaria meta-analysis could not quantify the impact on mortality of ET of malaria-resistant RBCs because RBC malaria resistance variables (ABO group, hemoglobin type, enzyme levels, etc.) had not been reported in any of the ET studies used in that meta-analysis. To promote evaluation of the therapeutic impact of specific malaria-resistant RBCs, we urge clinicians to always report ABO blood group (and all other RBC malaria-resistance variables they are aware of) when they use ET to rescue Pf-infected patients. Prudent selection of donor RBCs has successfully optimized ET for sickle cell disease patients, and this precedent suggests selection of special malaria-resistant donor RBCs may optimize ET for Pf-malaria patients. Given that ET is used worldwide as a rescue adjunct, we feel it is most prudent to now assume-until proven otherwise-that considering and reporting the Pf-malaria-resistance variables of the RBCs to be transfused-at least ABO status-will help optimize ET-for-malaria.

Blood Group Types O and Non-O Are Associated With Coronary Collateral Circulation Development.

Blood group types are associated with coronary artery disease. However, data are scarce about the impact of blood group types on coronary collateral circulation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the blood group types and coronary collateral circulation. Two hundred and twelve patients who underwent coronary angiography in our department and had a stenosis of ≥ 90% in at least one major epicardial vessel were included in our study. Collateral degree was graded according to Rentrop-Cohen classification. After grading, patients were divided into poor coronary collateral circulation (Rentrop grade 0 and 1) and good coronary collateral circulation (Rentrop 2 and 3) groups. The ABO blood type of all participants was determined. The incidence rates of O blood group type were significantly higher in the good coronary collateral group compared to the poor collateral group (37.9% vs 17.1%, P < .001). The O type blood group was an independent predictor of good coronary collateral circulation (odds ratio = 1.83, 95% confidence interval = 1.56-6.18, P = .015). Coronary collateral circulation is associated with blood group types. The O blood group predicts good coronary collateral development among patients with coronary artery disease.

ABO blood groups and risk of covid-19.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus pandemic has been the subject of a large number of publications, some of which have shown an increased risk of contracting Covid-19 in carriers of blood group A. AIMS: In this study we looked at the profile of blood group phenotype of a series of Tunisian patients with covid-19 admitted to Abderrahman Mami hospital in Ariana . METHODS: Our study included 51 Tunisian patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to Abderrahmane Mami hospital between late march 2020 and early May 2020. The distribution of blood groups in Covid-19 patients was compared with that of a control group of 1506 patients with no Covid-19 infection as well as with the distribution of blood groups in a population of 63375 voluntary blood donors. RESULTS: Our series, although limited in size, showed a higher prevalence of blood group A among Covid-19 patients, statistically significant compared to ABO blood group distribution among Tunisian blood donors and among a control group of patients without Covid -19. CONCLUSION: these results are in line with data from the literature, particularly on larger series in China.

Impact of ABO blood group incompatibility on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: ABO and Rh compatibility are not required between the donor and recipient for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Although ABO incompatibility is not considered a contraindication in alloHSCT, its clinical outcomes are still doubtful. In this study, we analyzed the neutrophil and platelet recovery, graft versus host disease (GVHD), relapse rate, mortality rate, non-relapse mortality and survival in patients who underwent alloHSCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty four patients with hematological malignant diseases, aplastic anemia and inborn errors of metabolism or the immune system that received an alloHSCT in our HSC transplant center between the years of 2001 and 2018 were evaluated. RESULTS: Indications for alloHSCT included both hematological malignancies (n = 233), aplastic anemia (n = 25) and benign conditions (n = 6). Of these donor recipient pairs, there were 189 (71.6%) matches, 36 (13.6%) major, 29 (11%) minor and 10 (3.8%) bidirectional ABO mismatches. The seventy-four (41.6%) of the ABO match and 27 (38.6%) of the ABO mismatch patients developed GvHD. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was ABO match group and ABO mismatch group were 65% and 73%, respectively (p = 0.36). The 5-year diasease free survival (DFS) for ABO match group and ABO mismatch group were 60% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed that ABO mismatch did not seem to have a significant effect on major outcomes after alloHSCT, such as developing GVHD, relapse rate, mortality rate, DFS and OS. ABO incompatibility did not lead to delayed platelet and neutrophil engraftment after alloHSCT.

ABO hemolytic disease of newborn : Does newborn's blood group a risk factor?

BACKGROUND: Due to the marked decline of maternal-fetal rhesus incompatibility, ABO alloimmunization has become the leading cause of the newborn hemolytic disease. It is estimated that 15-25 % of all pregnancies are concerned by ABO incompatibility. AIM: Neonatal blood group B seems to be more predisposing to acute hemolysis and severe hyperbilirubinemia. We propose to find if the newborn's blood group B represents a risk factor for severe hemolysis and/or severe hyperbilirubinemia. METHODS: We conducted a comparative study in the pediatrics department "B" of the Children Hospital of Tunis. We collected retrospectively the medical files of the newborn hospitalized for ABO alloimmunization (January 2011 - March 2014), then we compared two groups, OA group with OA alloimmunization and OB group with OB alloimmunization. A significant threshold was fixed to 0.05. RESULTS: We collected 98 cases of newborn ABO hemolytic disease. Both groups, OA and OB, were similar for the onset of jaundice, age of hospitalization, initial hemoglobin and indirect bilirubin levels. There were no statistically significant difference in the severity of hyperbilirubinemia and the use of exchange transfusion for the two groups. However, transfusion was statistically more frequent in the OB group compared to OA group (81.6‰ vs 10.2‰, p = 0,039, OR=2.9, 95% IC (1.1 - 7.8)). CONCLUSION: OB alloimmunization seems to induce more active hemolysis than OA one, with no difference for severe hyperbilirubinemia in both groups.

Kidney transplantation across minor ABO incompatibility: the use of A2 to B transplants.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: On 4 December 2014, the new kidney allocation system (KAS) went into effect. As part of this system, UNOS approved for the first time a national system with a specific mechanism affording priority to allocate kidneys across so-called 'minor ABO incompatibility' from blood group A2 donors into blood group B recipients. This significantly increased the number of such transplants done and the opportunities to learn about the specifics of such transplants. RECENT FINDINGS: A2 to B transplants have been demonstrated to be well tolerated, effective, and cost-effective ways of addressing disparities in the allocation system. Further data about the use of anti-A titers and the limits to successful transplant have better defined the bounds of who can benefit from such transplants. SUMMARY: The success thus far with A2 to B transplants should increase comfort and acceptance of the allocation policy changes and we should see further increases in centers willing to use such transplants to better address inequalities in the system.

ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation.

The effects of ABO incompatibility on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remain controversial. Large cohorts are required to obtain findings that allow for definite conclusions. We previously demonstrated poor overall survival and increased treatment-related mortality (TRM) in ABO-incompatible unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UR-BMT) performed during the period from 1993 to 2005. To improve our understanding of ABO-incompatible transplantation, we reanalyzed the effects of ABO mismatch in a UR-BMT cohort in Japan after 2000. Multivariate analyses for the 2000-2006 cohort showed that major ABO mismatch was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 1.211; 95% CI, 1.062 to 1.381; p = 0.004) and increased TRM (HR, 1.357; 95% CI, 1.146 to 1.608; p < 0.001). In the 2007-2015 cohort, major incompatibility had no effect on overall survival (HR, 0.987, p = 0.804) or TRM (HR, 1.020, p = 0.790). Delayed engraftment of erythrocytes, platelets, and neutrophils in cases of major mismatch was common between the two cohorts. In conclusion, the adverse effect of ABO major incompatibility has become less significant over time.

Comparative analysis of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with ABO-compatible transplantation: A single-center experience from Eastern India.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOiKT) with ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOcKT) in a singlecenter study. A total of 30 consecutive ABOiKT recipients (ABOiKTR) from April 2014 to June 2015 were included in this study. All the patients received rituximab 200 mg/body for B-cell depletion. Plasmapheresis was done for anti-ABO antibody removal. The target anti-ABO titer was kept at <1:8. The outcomes of this group of patients were compared with that of thirty ABOcKT recipients. Both the groups received similar induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin and methylprednisolone. After a follow-up period of one year, the outcomes of both the groups were compared in terms of patient survival, graft survival, graft function, incidence of rejections, infective complications, and duration of posttransplant hospital stay. The patient survival in both the groups of patients was 96.67%. The death-censored graft survival was 96.67% in both the groups. The average serum creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, incidence of rejections, infective episodes, and posttransplant hospital stay were comparable in both the groups. The outcomes of ABOiKT were comparable with ABOcKT and as such, this modality can expand the living donor pool substantially.

The role of ABO blood groups in glial neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: There are numerous diseases that are claimed to have a correlation with AB0 blood groups. Analysis on distribution of blood groups in primary brain tumors and clinical value has revealed conflicting results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between AB0 blood groups and glial neoplasms (GN) and their effects on prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective cross sectional study was performed. Patients admitted between 2000-2014 and had a diagnosis of GN were evaluated. Blood groups of patients were analyzed and compared with the National blood group data obtained from Turkish Red Crescent Society. The prognostic significance of AB0 blood groups was analyzed within glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic astrocytoma and grade 1-2 astrocytoma. RESULTS: 759 patients with a diagnosis of glial neoplasia were evaluated. Distribution of AB0 blood groups in the different grades of Glial neoplasia was similar with the national blood group frequencies. There was not a statistically significant difference between grades of glial neoplasia and healthy control patients. Median overall survival (mOS) of GBM patients were 12.9 months in A (95% CI, 10.2-15.5), 13.4 months in B (95% CI, 7.3-19.5), 5.7 months in AB (95% CI, 0.8-10.6), 12.8 months in 0 blood groups (95% CI, 8.6-16.8) (p = .46). mOS of anaplastic astrocytoma patients were 24.4 months in A (95% CI, 15.2-33.6), 47.2 months in B (95% CI, 9.9-84.5), 37.8 months in AB (95% CI, 10.2-80.3), 29.2 months in 0 blood groups (95% CI, 21.2-33.4) (p = .96). mOS in grade 1-2 were 84.2, 90.6 and 144 months for A, AB and 0 blood groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient group, when compared with general population, there seems to be no association between frequencies of AB0 blood groups and Glial Neoplasia. In addition, the AB0 blood groups have no prognostic impact on glial neoplasms.

ABO Blood Group and Diabetes Mellitus Influence the Risk for Pancreatic Cancer in a Population from China.

BACKGROUND The mechanism by which diabetes mellitus (DM) impacts the association between ABO blood types and pancreatic cancer is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective case-control study of 264 patients with pancreatic cancer and 423 age- and sex-matched individuals with nonmalignant diseases was performed to assess whether ABO blood group and DM jointly contribute to pancreatic cancer risk. RESULTS A multivariate analysis with adjustments for risk factors revealed that blood type, chronic pancreatitis, and DM were significantly associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk. The estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 2.130 (1.409-3.220) for blood type A, 2.383 (1.313-4.325) for blood type AB, 1.518 (1.012-2.276) for DM, and 10.930 (1.202-99.405) for chronic pancreatitis. Blood type A significantly modified the risk for pancreatic cancer in individuals with DM (AOR, 3.506; 95% CI, 1.659-7.409). CONCLUSIONS The risk for pancreatic cancer was associated with ABO blood type, DM, and chronic pancreatitis in a Chinese population. The risk was greatest for individuals with blood type A and DM.

Comparison of Liver Graft Regeneration Between ABO-Compatible and ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was accepted as a feasible therapy for end-stage liver disease after the introduction of rituximab. The present study investigated the association between ABO incompatibility and graft regeneration in patients who underwent LDLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 335 adult patients who underwent elective LDLT were divided into ABO-compatible (ABOc) and ABOi LDLT groups using propensity score (PS) matching of graft regeneration-related factors. Postoperative serial changes in graft volumes were compared between the groups. The factors associated with graft volume on postoperative day (POD) 21 were investigated in patients who underwent ABOi LDLT. RESULTS In total, 300 (89.6%) patients underwent ABOc LDLT and 35 (10.4%) patients underwent ABOi LDLT. After PS matching, the ABOc and ABOi groups each included 32 paired patients. The absolute liver graft volumes on POD 21 were significantly lower in the ABOi group than those in the ABOc group in the PS-matched patients (1098.4 [964.0-1,162.0] vs. 1202.0 [1107.8-1455.2] mL; p=0.007). Major complications, including overall patient mortality during the follow-up period, did not differ between the groups. In patients who underwent ABOi LDLT, the preoperative graft volume/standard liver volume ratio and CD4+ cell level on POD 14 were independent factors related to liver graft volume on POD 21. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that ABO incompatibility could affect postoperative liver graft regeneration. Therefore, graft regeneration must be investigated using a volumetric assessment in patients who have undergone ABOi LDLT.

ABO Blood Group and Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia in the Elderly Population: An Amirkola Health and Ageing Project (AHAP)-Based Study.

Osteoporosis is known as a degenerative disease of the skeletal system and its main complication is fracture, which influences quality of life in the elderly. There are 4 major blood groups in humans based on the presence of A and B antigens. According to the investigations, there are reported relations between blood types and some diseases. In this study, the association between the ABO blood group and the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an elderly population was investigated. Medical records of 990 elderly people were investigated in a cross-sectional study and the association between their blood group and the incidence of osteoporosis and osteopenia was analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results showed that ABO blood groups had no association with the prevalence of osteoporosis in both elderly men and women. The association between age and osteoporosis was significant and the association between this disorder and gender was significant too. The results also indicate that there is no association between RH+ and RH- blood types and osteoporosis and osteopenia in both men and women. Based on this finding, it would be reasonable to conduct extensive studies.

ABO Blood Group and Cochlear Status: Otoacoustic Emission Markers.

OBJECTIVES: There are an increasing number of research studies examining the effects of ABO blood group on susceptibility to disease. However, little is known regarding the potential relationship between blood group and hearing. Higher risk of noise-induced hearing loss was linked to blood group O in several occupational health studies. Based on this finding, a recent study of cochlear status was conducted with normal-hearing female participants representing equal numbers of the four blood groups in the ABO blood group system. ABO blood group was associated with cochlear characteristics, including the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and the amplitudes of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Females with blood group O showed significantly lower amplitudes of DPOAEs at some frequencies and lower prevalence of SOAEs compared with participants with blood group B. There was a general trend of reduced TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes in blood group O individuals compared with participants with non-O blood groups. Following from this finding, and based on known sex differences in otoacoustic emission characteristics, the present study examined the possible effects of blood group on otoacoustic emission status in males. DESIGN: Sixty clinically normal-hearing males aged between 18 and 26 years, with equal numbers of participants in each of the ABO blood groups, were recruited by purposive sampling. SOAE, DPOAE, and linear and nonlinear TEOAE recordings were collected from all participants, as well as tympanometric data related to external and middle ear characteristics. RESULTS: The male blood group O participants exhibited significantly lower SOAE prevalence and reduced amplitudes of DPOAEs on average, and in the midfrequency range, than participants with blood group B, and lower nonlinear and linear TEOAE amplitudes at a number of frequencies when compared with participants with blood groups A and B. A consistent trend of lower TEOAE and DPOAE response amplitudes was observed in participants with blood group O. No significant difference was noted among blood groups for outer or middle ear characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These results were consistent with previous findings of reduced otoacoustic emission responses in female blood group O individuals. Results support the hypothesis that blood group O individuals may be at increased risk of cochlear damage from noise exposure. Further investigation on the potential link between ABO blood group and auditory status, including potentially differential effects of noise exposure on cochlear function, is needed. The possible effects of ABO blood group on other aspects of audition, such as hearing sensitivity, speech understanding, and auditory processing, should be evaluated.

Effect of ABO blood type on the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of blood type on survival outcomes and adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received TKIs as first-line therapy for mRCC between 2008 and 2015 at our hospital were included in the study (n = 136). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their blood type as O and non-O. Survival outcomes and AEs were compared according to blood type. Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients, 34 (25%) and 102 (75%) had O and non-O blood types, respectively. Blood type O was associated with an increased number of disease sites. There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to other baseline characteristics. The progression-free survival in patients with O and non-O blood types was 12.1 and 11.6 months, respectively; the overall survival was 34.4 and 24.8 months, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the ABO blood type was not a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival or overall survival. Furthermore, the incidences of serious AEs were similar in the 2 blood groups. CONCLUSIONS: ABO blood type was not associated with survival outcomes or incidences of serious AEs in mRCC patients treated with TKIs. However, blood type O may be associated with an increased number of disease sites.

The association between ABO blood group and obstetric hemorrhage.

UNLABELLED: Whether intra- and early post-partum hemorrhage is influenced by ABO blood groups remains unknown. Therefore, we compared women with O to non-O blood groups with regard to maternal post-partum hemorrhage and transfusion need. This retrospective study was conducted in a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2014. For the purpose of the study, parturients were categorized as O and non-O blood groups. Data included all deliveries but excluded patients with missing blood grouping or hemoglobin values, and/or stillbirth. Drop in hemoglobin was defined as hemoglobin concentration at admission for delivery minus lowest hemoglobin concentration post-delivery. Study outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin drop >2-7 g/dL inclusive, and packed red blood cells transfusion. STATISTICS: descriptive, χ(2) (p < 0.05 significant) and multivariable regression models [odds ratio (OR), 95 % confidence interval (CI), p value]. 125,768 deliveries were included. After multivariable analysis, women with O blood type relative to women with non-O blood type had significantly higher odds of postpartum hemorrhage (OR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05-1.23, p < 0.001), higher odds of statistically significant hemoglobin decreases of >2, 3, or 4 g/dL (OR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.04-1.11, p < 0.001, OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.03-1.14, p = 0.002, OR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05-1.23, p = 0.001; respectively), and higher odds, albeit not statistically significant of 5, 6, or 7 g/dL decreases in hemoglobin (OR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.00-1.29, p = 0.055, OR 1.05; 95 % CI 0.84-1.32, p = 0.66, OR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.79-1.68, p = 0.46; respectively), but no difference in blood products transfusion (OR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.92-1.16, p = 0.58). In conclusion, women with blood type O may be at greater risk of obstetrical hemorrhage.