Proton pump inhibitors and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients with COVID-19 infection.

INTRODUCTION: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is anticipated to elevate an individual's susceptibility to enteric infections as a result of altering the gut flora. The influence of PPIs on the clinical manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of PPI usage on the clinical manifestation of COVID-19, namely its gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional cohort study involving COVID-19 patients. Patients were interviewed using a predesigned questionnaire that asked about their demographics, clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection, and the extent and type of PPIs in use. PPI usage was confirmed by reviewing patients' electronic medical records. The primary outcome was to establish any association between the use of PPI and the symptoms and clinical presentation of COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of a total of 254 participants, 69 (27.2%) were considered PPI users. Patients who were on PPI medications reported a significantly lower rate of myalgia (27.5% vs 51.9%; p = 0.0006) and heartburn (5.7% vs 15.6%; p = 0.03) but had a significantly higher rate of abdominal pain (27.5% vs 13.5%; p = 0.001) and diarrhoea (28.9% vs 14.5%, p = 0.02) when compared to those who were not using PPIs. Patients on PPIs were also shown to have significantly higher odds of developing diarrhoea (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.93, p = 0.02) and abdominal pain (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.93, p = 0.03), but a lower risk of developing myalgia (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9, p = 0.02) when compared to non-PPI users. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the use of PPIs could impact COVID-19 clinical presentation toward more gastrointestinal manifestations. Further studies investigating the link between other acid suppression medications and COVID-19 manifestations and severity should be carried out.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.

SummaryCannabis use is legalised in many countries. We present a patient in their 40s who complained of recurrent abdominal pain and associated nausea and vomiting. The patient was previously seen in various hospitals, treated symptomatically, and discharged with a diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain. The patient had a chronic history of smoking cannabis and nicotine and drinking alcohol. Abdominal examination revealed no masses, and abdominal X-ray was normal. Blood tests and gastroduodenoscopy revealed no obvious aetiology. Intravenous fluids, together with antiemetics and proton pump inhibitors, were administered. The patient also received counselling and was advised to stop cannabis use. At discharge, the patient was well and asked to come back for review in 2 weeks, and, thereafter monthly for a period of 6 months after stopping cannabis use. The patient reported no recurrent symptoms despite continued cigarette and alcohol use. A suspected cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) became a consideration. Awareness of cannabis-related disorders such as CHS may assist in avoiding costly hospital workups.

Nephrotic syndrome with rectus sheath hematoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Rectus sheath hematoma is a rare presentation often associated with abdominal trauma and anticoagulant therapy. Here, we present a patient with severe rectus sheath hematoma accompanied by nephrotic syndrome who achieved significant clinical improvement without the need for invasive treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our hospital for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. She was receiving steroid and anticoagulant therapy. Then she had abdominal pain and she was diagnosed with spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma by abdominal computed tomography. She received transfusion and was managed conservatively with bed rest, which led to improvement in abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of trauma history, rectus sheath hematoma should be considered in patients at risk of vascular failure, including those receiving anticoagulant or steroid therapy, those who are elderly, and those with nephrotic syndrome.

Menthacarin treatment attenuates nociception in models of visceral hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Chronic visceral hypersensitivity is closely associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a very common disorder which significantly impairs quality of life, characterized by abdominal pain, and distension. Imaging studies have found that IBS patients show higher metabolic activities and functional differences from normal controls in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), in response to visceral pain stimulation. Non-clinical data and clinical data suggest that medicinal products containing essential oils such as peppermint or caraway oil exert beneficial effects on IBS symptoms. METHODS: We assessed acute and long-term treatment effects of a mixture of peppermint and caraway essential oils (Menthacarin) on brain electrophysiological markers of gut pain sensitivity in two rat models of visceral hypersensitivity. KEY RESULTS: Chronic administration of corticosteroids and acute repeated mechanical hyperstimulation under anesthesia induced hyperalgesia and hypersensitivity, characterized by an increase in electrophysiological excitatory responses of ACC neurons to colorectal distension (CRD) and an increase in the proportion of neurons responding to otherwise subthreshold stimulation, respectively. Long-term, but not acute, oral administration of Menthacarin (60 mg kg-1 day-1) significantly reduced the net excitatory response to CRD in normally responsive control animals and counteracted the development of visceral hyperalgesia and hypersensitivity induced by repeated corticosterone administration and acute mechanical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The present study shows that, using the CRD method, chronic Menthacarin administration at a clinically relevant dose attenuates the neuronal discharge associated with visceral pain stimuli in the rat ACC, particularly in models of hypersensitivity, suggesting a potential for treating exaggerated visceral pain sensitivity.

Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis due to COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The worldwide vaccination response to COVID-19 has been associated with rare thrombotic complications, including the case of postvaccination splanchnic venous thrombosis we report here. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old Japanese male with abdominal pain presented to our hospital six days after receiving a dose of the COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine. Abdominal computed tomography showed localized edema of the small intestine, increased density of the surrounding adipose tissue, and a thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein. Conservative inpatient treatment with unfractionated heparin relieved the thrombosis, and the patient is currently receiving oral apixaban as an outpatient. CONCLUSION: Reported cases of thrombosis after COVID-19 vaccination typically have been associated with viral vector vaccines, with few reports of thrombosis induced by mRNA vaccines. The potential for venous thrombosis should be explored when patients present with abdominal pain soon after COVID-19 vaccination.

Gastrointestinal adverse events of tirzepatide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and trials sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tirzepatide (TZP) is a novel drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) is a limiting factor in clinical application. Therefore, this study systematically evaluated the GI AEs of TZP for T2DM. METHODS: Clinical trials of TZP for T2DM were retrieved from eight databases published only from the establishment of the database to February 2023. Revman5.3 and TSA0.9.5.10 Beta were used for meta-analysis and trials sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, total GI AEs, nausea, decreased appetite, constipation and vomiting were significantly higher in all dose groups of TZP (P < .05), while abdominal pain and abdominal distension were comparable (P > .05). TSA showed that the differences in total GI AEs, nausea, decreased appetite and constipation were conclusive. Compared with insulin, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting and decreased appetite were significantly increased in all doses of TZP (P < .05), and dyspepsia was significantly increased with TZP 15 mg (P < .05). TSA showed that these differences were all conclusive. Compared with GLP-1 RA, decreased appetite was significantly higher with TZP 5 mg, total GI AEs, decreased appetite and diarrhea were significantly higher with TZP 10 mg (P < .05), while nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and constipation were significantly different in all dose groups, abdominal pain were not significantly different (P < .05) and TSA showed no conclusive results in this group. CONCLUSION: The GI AEs of TZP were significantly higher than those of placebo and insulin, but comparable to GLP-1 RA. Nausea, diarrhea and decreased appetite are very common GI AEs of TZP, and the incidence is positively correlated with dose. GI AEs of TZP decrease gradually over time, so long-term steady medication may be expected to reduce GI AEs.

[Clinical characteristics and related factors analysis of adrenal crisis occurred in children with primary nephrotic syndrome].

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and related factors of corticosteroid induced adrenal crisis (AC) in children with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS). Methods: Case control study. The case group included 7 children aged 1 to 18 years with NS combined with AC hospitalized in Peking University First Hospital from January 2016 to May 2021 (AC group). According to the ratio of case group: control group 1: 4, 28 children aged 1 to 18 years who were diagnosed with NS without AC during the same period were matched as controls (non-AC group). Clinical data were collected. The clinical characteristics of AC were described. The clinical parameters were compared between the 2 groups by t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the cutoff values of clinical parameters for prediction of AC. Results: The AC group included 4 boys and 3 girls aged 6.9 (4.6, 10.8) years. The non-AC group included 20 boys and 8 girls aged 5.2 (3.3, 8.4) years. All AC events occurred during the relapse of NS with infection. Seven children had gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Six children had poor mental state or impaired consciousness. No significant differences in NS course, corticosteroid treatment course, corticosteroid type, steroid dosage, steroid medication interval, the proportion of gastroenteritis and fever existed between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the non-AC group, the duration from the onset of the relapse of NS until hospitalization in the AC group was significantly shorter (0.2 (0.1, 0.6) vs. 1.0 (0.4, 5.0) month,U=25.50, P=0.005). The 24 h urinary total protein (UTP) level was significantly higher in the AC group (193 (135, 429) vs. 81 (17, 200) mg/kg, U=27.00,P=0.036) than the non-AC group. The serum albumin level in the AC group was significantly lower((13.1±2.1) vs. (24.5±8.7) g/L,t=-6.22,P<0.001) than the non-AC group. There were significantly higher total white blood cell counts ((26±9)×109 vs. (11±5)×109/L,t=4.26,P=0.004), percentage of neutrophils (0.71±0.08 vs. 0.60±0.19,t=2.56,P=0.017) and the proportion of children with C reactive protein level≥8 mg/L (3/7 vs. 0,P=0.005) in the AC group than in the non-AC group. ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of 24 h UTP was 122 mg/(kg·d) with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 70.4%. The cutoff value of serum albumin was 17.0 g/L with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 82.1%. Conclusions: Gastrointestinal symptoms and poor mental state were prominent manifestations of AC in children with NS. High 24 h UTP level, low serum albumin level, high peripheral white blood cell counts, high neutrophils percentage, and high C-reactive protein level during the early stage of NS relapse may be related to the occurrence of AC in children with NS.

Probiotic containing Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17648 as an adjunct treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple therapy regimens, the decline in the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate poses a significant challenge to the medical community. Adding Lactobacillus reuteri probiotic as an adjunct treatment has shown some promising results. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17648 in H. pylori eradication and its effect in ameliorating gastrointestinal symptoms and adverse treatment effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involved treatment-naïve H. pylori-positive patients. Ninety patients received standard triple therapy for 2 weeks before receiving either a probiotic or placebo for 4 weeks. The posttreatment eradication rate was assessed via a 14 C urea breath test in Week 8. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire and an interview on treatment adverse effects were conducted during this study. RESULTS: The eradication rate was higher in the probiotic group than in the placebo group, with a 22.2% difference in the intention-to-treat analysis (91.1% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.007) and 24.3% difference in the per-protocol analysis (93.2% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.007). The probiotic group showed significant pre- to post-treatment reductions in indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain, and total GSRS scores. The probiotic group showed significantly greater reductions in GSRS scores than the placebo group: indigestion (4.34 ± 5.00 vs. 1.78 ± 5.64; p = 0.026), abdominal pain (2.64 ± 2.88 vs. 0.89 ± 3.11; p = 0.007), constipation (2.34 ± 3.91 vs. 0.64 ± 2.92; p = 0.023), and total score (12.41 ± 12.19 vs. 4.24 ± 13.72; p = 0.004). The probiotic group reported significantly fewer adverse headache (0% vs. 15.6%; p = 0.012) and abdominal pain (0% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.026) effects. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in H. pylori eradication rate and attenuation of symptoms and adverse treatment effects when L. reuteri was given as an adjunct treatment.

Rectus Sheath Hematoma in a Patient with Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Including Ticagrelor: A Case Report.

Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain associated with several risk factors including trauma, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pregnancy, and anticoagulation as it can be iatrogenic. Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combined usage of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin, is a cornerstone treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor with several adverse hemorrhagic complications. An 86-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal mass at the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. His medical history revealed coronary artery disease with medications including acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed RSH. The patient was treated conservatively with bed rest and analgesia. DAPT is an essential component of the management of acute coronary syndromes to prevent recurrent cardiac thrombotic events. However, hemorrhagic complications such as RSH may be encountered with DAPT. Emergency medicine physicians and cardiologists should keep in mind RSH in patients presenting with abdominal pain and using DAPT with ticagrelor.

Abdominal pain accompanied by elevated serum inflammatory markers and biliary enzymes for diagnosing immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced sclerosing cholangitis.

Immune-related sclerosing cholangitis (irSC) is relatively rare and its clinical characteristics are not well known. In this study, we aimed to summarize the clinical features of irSC. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from 1,393 patients with advanced malignancy treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between August 2014 and October 2021. We analyzed patients with immune-related adverse events of liver injury (liver-irAEs) and compared irSC and non-irSC groups. Sixty-seven patients (4.8%) had a liver-irAE (≥ grade 3) during the follow-up period (median, 262 days). Among these, irSC was observed in eight patients (11.9%). All patients in the irSC group were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Compared with the non-irSC group, the irSC group showed mainly non-hepatocellular liver injury (87.5 % vs 50.8 %, P = 0.065), and had elevated serum inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP and NLR) and biliary enzymes (e.g., GGTP and ALP) at the onset of liver-irAEs. Furthermore, most patients with irSC had abdominal pain. In the non-irSC group, the liver injury of 23 patients improved only with the discontinuation of ICIs, and 22 patients improved with medication including prednisolone (PSL). Conversely, almost all patients (n=7) in the irSC group were treated with PSL, but only two patients experienced an improvement in liver injury. We found that irSC is characterized by a non-hepatocellular type of liver injury with abdominal pain and a high inflammatory response and is refractory to treatment. Further examination by imaging is recommended to detect intractable irSC in cases with these characteristics.

Update on treatment of abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome: A narrative review.

The objectives of this narrative review are to update readers on the current state-of-the-art regarding diverse approaches for the treatment of pain, global symptoms, or adequate relief in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The article appraises medications, dietary interventions including low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, fecal microbial transplantation (FMT), electrical approaches, and behavioral therapies including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH), mindfulness, and open-label placebo. Current evidence demonstrates only modest benefit in global IBS symptoms and pain relief. A future approach that identifies pathophysiological mechanisms of IBS through validated biomarkers has the potential to individualize treatment of patients rather than sequential therapeutic trial and error approaches.

Clinical outcomes among young patients with Fabry disease who initiated agalsidase beta treatment before 30 years of age: An analysis from the Fabry Registry.

BACKGROUND: Clinical manifestations of classic Fabry disease (α-galactosidase A deficiency) usually occur in childhood, while complications involving major organs typically develop in adulthood. Outcomes of Fabry-specific treatment among young patients have not been extensively reported. Our aim was to analyze clinical outcomes among patients aged 5-30 years at initiation of treatment with agalsidase beta using data from the Fabry Registry (NCT00196742, sponsor: Sanofi). METHODS: Reported GLA variants were predicted to be associated with the classic phenotype or not classified in fabry-database.org. Linear mixed models were conducted to assess changes over ≥2-year follow-up in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stratified by low (LRI) and high (HRI) renal involvement (defined by proteinuria/albuminuria levels), and changes in interventricular septal thickness (IVST) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) Z-scores stratified by median age at first treatment. Self-reports ('yes'/'no') of abdominal pain, diarrhea, chronic peripheral pain (denoting neuropathic pain), and acute pain crises at baseline were compared with reports after ≥0.5-year and ≥2.5-year follow-up using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Male (n = 117) and female patients (n = 59) with LRI initiated treatment at a median age of 19.9 and 23.6 years, respectively, and were followed for a median of 6.3 and 5.0 years, respectively. The eGFR slopes were -1.18 (Pfrom 0 <0.001) and -0.92 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Pfrom 0 = 0.040), respectively. Males with HRI (n = 23, median UPCR 1.0 g/g), who started treatment at a median age of 26.7 years, had an eGFR slope of -2.39 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Pfrom 0 <0.001; Pdifference = 0.055, as compared with the slope of -1.18 mL/min/1.73 m2/year for LRI males) during a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Echocardiographic variables were stable among males, regardless of age, and among young females (median follow-up >5.5 years and ≥4.5 years, respectively). Older females (treatment initiation at median age 27.5 years) had a slope of LVPWT Z-scores of 0.18/year (n = 12, Pfrom 0 = 0.028), whereas IVST Z-scores remained stable (n = 13, 0.10/year, Pfrom 0 = 0.304) during a median follow-up of ≥3.7 years. These slopes did not significantly differ from slopes of younger females. Reports of chronic peripheral pain and acute pain crises by males, and of diarrhea and acute pain crises by females, significantly reduced after a median follow-up of ≥4.0 years. After a median follow-up of ≥5.4 years, reports of all four symptoms significantly decreased among males, whereas among females only reports of abdominal pain significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: During sustained treatment with agalsidase beta in young Fabry patients with a predicted classic phenotype or with unclassified GLA variants with similar characteristics, the decline in eGFR was modest among male and female patients with LRI. The greater decline in eGFR among older, proteinuric (i.e., HRI) males may suggest a benefit of earlier treatment. Overall, echocardiographic variables remained stable, particularly among males and younger females. Significant reductions in symptom reports occurred primarily among males after longer follow-up and were less noticeable among females. These observed trends are suggestive of an overall improvement after treatment in young patients, but warrant larger longitudinal studies.

Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet is associated with increased risk of uninvestigated chronic dyspepsia and its symptoms in adults.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the potential effects of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) diet on functional gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly upper gastrointestinal symptoms, is not clearly understood. The current study aimed to explore the association of a diet low in FODMAPs with uninvestigated chronic dyspepsia (UCD) and functional dyspeptic symptoms in a large population of Iranian adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2987 adults. Dietary FODMAPs intake estimated using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. UCD, early satiation, postprandial fullness and gastric pain were determined using a modified and validated version of the Rome III Questionnaire. RESULTS: After controlling for various confounders, consumption of a diet low in FODMAPs was associated with increased risk of UCD in the whole population (OR=1.85; 95% CI: 1.23-2.78; P=0.009) and women (OR=2.41; 95% CI: 1.46-3.95; P=0.004), but not in men. Higher consumption of a low-FODMAPs diet was related to increased risk of postprandial fullness (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.08-1.78; P=0.046). The inverse association between FODMAPs and epigastric pain tended to be significant after controlling for eating behaviors (OR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.98-1.76; P=0.084). No significant association was observed for early satiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that consumption of a low-FODMAPs diet may increase the risk of UCD and postprandial fullness; however, well-planned randomized controlled trials and prospective cohorts are required to ascertain the effect of FODMAPs on upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor gastritis is often associated with concomitant enterocolitis, which impacts the clinical course.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events are frequently caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and often require interruption of cancer treatment. Compared with ICI colitis and enteritis, limited information exists about ICI gastritis. This study characterized clinical features and treatment outcomes of ICI gastritis. METHODS: Consecutive cancer patients who received ICIs and underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies while on ICIs from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Specific histopathologic features identified ICI gastritis. RESULTS: Of 6450 ICI-treated patients, 162 (2.5%) underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies. ICI gastritis was identified in 54 (33%) biopsied patients; 38 (70%) had concurrent ICI enteritis/colitis and 16 (30%) had isolated ICI gastritis. Dyspepsia (38%) and bloating (25%) were the most frequent symptoms of isolated ICI gastritis. Compared with patients with concomitant enteritis/colitis, patients with isolated gastritis were less likely to have diarrhea (13% vs 68%; p < .001) or abdominal pain (19% vs 47%; p = .07). Patients with isolated ICI gastritis less frequently required glucocorticoids (69% vs 92%; p = .04) and had lower incidence of ICI hold/withdrawal (13% vs 42%; p = .06). There was no association between severity or extent of luminal inflammation and antitumor response (p = .85 and p = .44, respectively). Endoscopically, gastric mucosa appeared normal in 11 (20%) patients with biopsy-proven ICI gastritis. CONCLUSION: ICI gastritis may present alone or more commonly with concurrent enteritis/colitis, which may differentiate its clinical course. Gastric biopsies are required to diagnose a substantial minority of endoscopically normal, clinically significant cases. Most patients with isolated gastritis can continue ICI therapy uninterrupted, but a notable proportion require glucocorticoids. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective anticancer treatments, but can cause inflammatory toxicities, including of the stomach (gastritis), intestine, and colon. Limited information is available on gastritis triggered by these agents. Adult patients with cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and had an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach were examined. More than two-thirds (70%) of people with checkpoint inhibitor gastritis also had inflammatory changes of the small intestine and/or colon. Compared with patients with isolated checkpoint gastritis, the subgroup with concomitant enteritis/colitis more frequently had abdominal pain, diarrhea, needed steroids, and/or needed to pause or stop antitumor therapy.

Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (BERGAMOT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-ß7 monoclonal antibody targeting α4ß7 and αEß7 integrins. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two doses of etrolizumab with placebo in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: BERGAMOT was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 326 treatment centres worldwide. We included patients aged 18-80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score of 220-480, and a mean daily stool frequency score of ≥6 or a mean daily stool frequency score of >3, and a mean daily abdominal pain score of >1, as well as the presence of active inflammation on screening ileocolonoscopy) who had intolerance, inadequate response, or no response to one or more of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or anti-TNF therapy within the past 5 years. BERGAMOT consisted of three induction cohorts (a placebo-controlled, double-blind exploratory cohort [cohort 1]; an active treatment cohort not containing a placebo control [cohort 2]; and a placebo-controlled, double-blind pivotal cohort [cohort 3]) and one maintenance cohort. In induction cohort 3, during the 14-week induction, patients were randomly assigned (2:3:3) to receive matched placebo, 105 mg etrolizumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks (at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12) or 210 mg etrolizumab subcutaneously (at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12), stratified by concomitant treatment with oral corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, baseline disease activity, and previous exposure to anti-TNF therapy. To preserve masking, all patients received two injections at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 and one injection at week 2. Week 14 etrolizumab responders from all cohorts were re-randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 105 mg etrolizumab (etrolizumab maintenance group) or placebo (placebo maintenance group) every 4 weeks for 52 weeks; patients in the induction placebo group underwent a sham re-randomisation to preserve masking. During maintenance, randomisation was stratified by CDAI remission status, concomitant treatment with oral corticosteroids, induction dose regimen, and previous exposure to anti-TNF therapy. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment for both induction and maintenance. Co-primary induction endpoints at week 14 (placebo vs 210 mg etrolizumab) were clinical remission (mean stool frequency ≤3 and mean abdominal pain ≤1, with no worsening) and endoscopic improvement (≥50% reduction in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD]). Co-primary maintenance endpoints at week 66 (placebo vs etrolizumab) were clinical remission and endoscopic improvement. Efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug (induction) and as all patients re-randomised into maintenance who received at least one dose of study drug in the maintenance phase (maintenance). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Maintenance safety analyses include all adverse events occurring in both induction and maintenance. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02394028, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between March 20, 2015, and Sept 7, 2021, 385 patients (209 [54%] male and 326 [85%] white) were randomly assigned in induction cohort 3 to receive placebo (n=97), 105 mg etrolizumab (n=143), or 210 mg etrolizumab (n=145). 487 patients had a CDAI-70 response in any of the induction cohorts and were enrolled into the maintenance cohort, of whom 434 had a response to etrolizumab and were randomly assigned to placebo (n=217) or 105 mg etrolizumab (n=217). At week 14, 48 (33%) of 145 patients in the 210 mg induction etrolizumab group versus 28 (29%) of 96 patients in the placebo induction group were in clinical remission (adjusted treatment difference 3·8% [95% CI -8·3 to 15·3]; p=0·52), and 40 (27%) versus 21 (22%) showed endoscopic improvement (5·8% [-5·4 to 17·1]; p=0·32). At week 66, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving etrolizumab than those receiving placebo had clinical remission (76 [35%] of 217 vs 52 [24%] of 217; adjusted treatment difference 11·3% [95% CI 2·7-19·7]; p=0·0088) and endoscopic improvement (51 [24%] vs 26 [12%]; 11·5% [4·1-18·8]; p=0·0026). Similar proportions of patients reported one or more adverse events during induction (95 [66%] of 143 in the 105 mg etrolizumab group, 85 [59%] of 145 in the 210 mg etrolizumab group, and 51 [53%] of 96 in the placebo group) and maintenance (189 [87%] of 217 in the etrolizumab group and 190 [88%] of 217 in the placebo group). During induction, the most common treatment-related adverse events were injection site erythema (six [4%] of 143 in the 105 mg etrolizumab group, four [3%] of 145 in the 210 mg etrolizumab group, and none of 96 in the placebo group), and arthralgia (two [1%], one [1%], and four [4%]). In the maintenance cohort, the most common treatment-related adverse events were injection site erythema (six [3%] of 217 in the etrolizumab group vs 14 [6%] of 217 in the placebo: group), arthralgia (five [2%] vs eight [4%]), and headache (five [2%] vs seven [3%]). The most common serious adverse event was exacerbation of Crohn's disease (14 [6%] of 217 patients taking placebo and four [2%] of 217 patients taking 105 mg etrolizumab in the maintenance cohort). INTERPRETATION: A significantly higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease achieved clinical remission and endoscopic improvement with etrolizumab than placebo during maintenance, but not during induction. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Clinical characteristics and related factors analysis of adrenal crisis occurred in children with primary nephrotic syndrome / 中华儿科杂志

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and related factors of corticosteroid induced adrenal crisis (AC) in children with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS). Methods: Case control study. The case group included 7 children aged 1 to 18 years with NS combined with AC hospitalized in Peking University First Hospital from January 2016 to May 2021 (AC group). According to the ratio of case group: control group 1: 4, 28 children aged 1 to 18 years who were diagnosed with NS without AC during the same period were matched as controls (non-AC group). Clinical data were collected. The clinical characteristics of AC were described. The clinical parameters were compared between the 2 groups by t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the cutoff values of clinical parameters for prediction of AC. Results: The AC group included 4 boys and 3 girls aged 6.9 (4.6, 10.8) years. The non-AC group included 20 boys and 8 girls aged 5.2 (3.3, 8.4) years. All AC events occurred during the relapse of NS with infection. Seven children had gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Six children had poor mental state or impaired consciousness. No significant differences in NS course, corticosteroid treatment course, corticosteroid type, steroid dosage, steroid medication interval, the proportion of gastroenteritis and fever existed between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the non-AC group, the duration from the onset of the relapse of NS until hospitalization in the AC group was significantly shorter (0.2 (0.1, 0.6) vs. 1.0 (0.4, 5.0) month,U=25.50, P=0.005). The 24 h urinary total protein (UTP) level was significantly higher in the AC group (193 (135, 429) vs. 81 (17, 200) mg/kg, U=27.00,P=0.036) than the non-AC group. The serum albumin level in the AC group was significantly lower((13.1±2.1) vs. (24.5±8.7) g/L,t=-6.22,P<0.001) than the non-AC group. There were significantly higher total white blood cell counts ((26±9)×109 vs. (11±5)×109/L,t=4.26,P=0.004), percentage of neutrophils (0.71±0.08 vs. 0.60±0.19,t=2.56,P=0.017) and the proportion of children with C reactive protein level≥8 mg/L (3/7 vs. 0,P=0.005) in the AC group than in the non-AC group. ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of 24 h UTP was 122 mg/(kg·d) with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 70.4%. The cutoff value of serum albumin was 17.0 g/L with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 82.1%. Conclusions: Gastrointestinal symptoms and poor mental state were prominent manifestations of AC in children with NS. High 24 h UTP level, low serum albumin level, high peripheral white blood cell counts, high neutrophils percentage, and high C-reactive protein level during the early stage of NS relapse may be related to the occurrence of AC in children with NS.

The efficacy of mifepristone combined with methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of mifepristone combined with methotrexate therapy for ectopic pregnancy (EP), analyze the experimental designs, put forward improvement ideas. METHODS: RCTs of mifepristone combined with mifepristone for EP until January 2022 in six databases were searched. The primary outcome indicator was the cure rate. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyse and the online GRADEpro tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs involved 2263 patients. The cure rate was higher in the investigational group (OR = 4.09, 95%CI: [3.20, 5.22]), time of vagina stopped bleeding (MD = -11.21, 95%CI: [-11.85, -10.57]) and time of abdominal pain disappeared (MD = -6.24, 95%CI: [-6.63, -5.86]) were shorter in the investigational group, ß-HCG level (MD = -585.32, 95%CI: [-609.62, -561.03]) was lower and diameter of the mass (MD = -1.23, 95%CI: [-1.40, -106]) was smaller in the investigational group. The certainty of the evidence for most outcomes was moderate or high, and only one was low. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mifepristone and methotrexate can improve the efficacy of ectopic pregnancy without amplifying the toxic side effects. Larger scale and better design of the randomized controlled trials are needed.KEY MESSAGESIn recent years, the increase in ectopic pregnancies and their impacts on female fertility makes physicians have to find an effective medical treatment as soon as possible that can avoid surgery.The mifepristone combined with methotrexate therapy for EP has better curative effects on improving the cure rate, lowering ß-HCG level, reducing the mass, and alleviating symptoms of abdominal pain and bleeding, without amplifying the toxic side effects.Literature with high quality is lacking, and well-designed, large-scale and high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed.

Lisinopril-Induced Small Bowel Angioedema: An Unusual Cause of Severe Abdominal Pain.

BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are one of the most frequently prescribed classes of medications with the rare adverse effect of angioedema, and isolated small bowel angioedema is a small subset of these cases. Isolated angioedema of the small bowel is a rare adverse effect of this commonly prescribed medication, and it mimics, symptomatically and radiographically, several other illnesses and is often misdiagnosed. While ACE-I are thought to be safe, the risk of angioedema is approximately 0.7%. Isolated small bowel angioedema is often not diagnosed in a timely manner, and misdiagnosis leads to significant morbidity in afflicted patients. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 63-year-old woman with angioedema of the small bowel causing abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Computed tomography demonstrated small bowel edema and ascites. The patient had been taking lisinopril for 7 years prior to presentation and had previously been seen by multiple physicians for abdominal pain. A diagnosis of ACE-I-induced small bowel angioedema was made and lisinopril therapy was immediately stopped. Her symptoms improved with cessation of lisinopril, and follow-up imaging showed resolution of the angioedema 3 months later. CONCLUSIONS The course of ACE-I-induced angioedema is unpredictable and often overlooked as a cause of abdominal pain. It commonly presents soon after starting ACE-I therapy, but can present years after therapy initiation, as in this case. Significant morbidity, including unnecessary exploratory laparotomy, is associated with misdiagnosis of ACE-I-induced angioedema of the small bowel. Prompt recognition and cessation of the offending drug is crucial but often delayed.

Adrenal infarction secondary to methamphetamine use: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: An acute abdomen can have a variety of causes. A commonly missed cause of abdominal pain is direct substance abuse and its sequelae. The use of methamphetamine is rising in the United States resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There has been no reported case of methamphetamine-induced adrenal infarction based on an extensive review of available literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 34-year-old Hispanic man who presented with acute abdominal pain secondary to adrenal infarction in the setting of methamphetamine use. Left paraumbilical tenderness was present on abdominal examination. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis revealed internal hypoenhancement of the left adrenal gland, consistent with acute left adrenal infarction. The patient was managed with enoxaparin and apixaban. CONCLUSION: Substance abuse, especially among young patients, can at times present with acute abdomen. This mandates physicians to be vigilant and take into consideration the history of substance abuse and relevant investigations. Timely diagnosis and management can prevent life-threatening complications.

Gastrointestinal adverse events of metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: Metformin is the first choice drug in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus but its administration may be linked to gastrointestinal adverse events limiting its use. Objectives: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events related to metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Methods: PUB MED/CINAHL/Web of Science/Scopus were searched from database inception until 08.11.2020 for articles in English and randomized controlled trials related to patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin were included. Results: From 5315 publications, we identified 199 potentially eligible full-text articles. Finally, 71 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, metformin use was associated with higher risk of abdominal pain, diarrhea and nausea comparing to control. The risks of abdominal pain and nausea were highest comparing to placebo. Bloating risk was only elevated when metformin treatment was compared to DPP4i. Conclusions: The risk of gastrointestinal adverse events such as abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea is higher in type 2 diabetes patients treated with metformin compared to other antidiabetic drugs. There is a higher risk of bloating and diarrhea with metformin immediate-release than with metformin extended release formulation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289975, identifier CRD42021289975.