Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.627
Filter
1.
Issues Law Med ; 39(1): 66-75, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771715

ABSTRACT

Background: A previous Danish study of monthly and tri-monthly rates of first-time psychiatric contact following first induced abortions reported higher rates compared to first live births but similar rates compared to nine months pre-abortion. Therefore, the researchers concluded abortion has no independent effect on mental health; any differences between psychiatric contacts after abortion and delivery are entirely attributable to pre-existing mental health differences. However, these conclusions are inconsistent with similar studies that used longer time frames. Reanalysis of the published Danish data over slightly longer time frames may reconcile this discordance. Method: Monthly and tri-monthly data was extracted for reanalysis of cumulative effects over nine- and twelvemonths post-abortion. Results: Across all psychiatric diagnoses, cumulative average monthly rate of first-time psychiatric contact increased from an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.22) at 9-months to 1.49 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.63) at 12 months post-abortion as compared to the 9 months pre-abortion rate. At 12 months post-abortion, first-time psychiatric contact was higher across all four diagnostic groupings and highest for personality or behavioral disorders (OR=1.87; 95% CI:1.48 to 2.36) and neurotic, stress related, or somatoform disorders (OR=1.60; 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.81). Conclusions: Our reanalysis revealed that the Danish data is consistent with the larger body of both record-based and survey- based studies when viewed over periods of observation of at least nine months. Longer periods of observation are necessary to capture both anniversary reactions and the exhaustion of coping mechanisms which may delay observation of post-abortion effects.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Mental Disorders , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Humans , Female , Denmark/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11385, 2024 05 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762680

ABSTRACT

This article aims to report the comprehensive and up-to-date analysis and evidence of the insertion rate, expulsion rate, removal rate, and utilization rate of immediate placement of intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus delayed placement after artificial abortion. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched up to January 12, 2024 for studies that compared immediate versus delayed insertion of IUDs after abortion. The evaluation metrics included the number of IUD insertion after surgical or medical abortions, the frequency of expulsion and removal at 6 months or 1 year, the number of continued usage, pain intensity scores, the number of infections, the duration of bleeding, and instances of uterine perforation during or after IUD insertion. Ten randomized controlled articles were eligible, comprising 11 research projects, of which 3 projects involved the placement of an IUD after surgical abortion, and 8 projects involved the placement of an IUD after medical abortion. This included 2025 patients (977 in the immediate insertion group and 1,048 in the delayed insertion group). We summarized all the extracted evidence. The meta-analysis results indicated that for post-surgical abortions, the immediate insertion group exhibited a higher IUD placement rate than the delayed insertion group. After medical abortions, the immediate insertion group showed higher rates of IUD placement, utilization, and expulsion at 6 months or 1 year. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the removal rate, post-insertion infection rate, pain scores during insertion, and days of bleeding during the follow-up period. Compared to delayed placement, immediate insertion of IUDs can not only increase the usage rate at 6 months or 1 year but also enhance the placement rate.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Intrauterine Devices , Humans , Female , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods , Pregnancy , Time Factors , Device Removal
3.
Acta Radiol ; 65(6): 670-677, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and post-abortion hemorrhage (PAH) are life-threatening conditions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of uterine arterial embolization (UAE) for PPH and PAH and to investigate future fertility after UAE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 57 consecutive patients (mean age = 34 years) who underwent UAE for PPH (n = 46) and PAH (n = 11) at our institution between January 2011 and December 2022. Technical success, non-visualization of the peripheral portion of bilateral uterine arteries on angiography, and clinical success, complete hemostasis after UAE, were assessed. UAE-associated complications and factors related to clinical success were analyzed. Pregnancy outcomes after UAE and complications during subsequent pregnancy were investigated in 16 patients who desired fertility and were followed up for >1 year. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 84.2%, respectively. Sepsis (n = 1) and uterine empyema (n = 1) were observed as severe complications. Placental disorder, bleeding within 24 h after delivery or abortion, ≥1.5 shock index, ≥6 units of transfusion erythrocytes, and ≥8 obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation score were significantly associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. In total, 16 pregnancies were observed in 12 patients after UAE, three of which were miscarriages and 13 were successful live births. During pregnancy, uterine rupture (n = 1) and accreta (n = 1) were observed. CONCLUSION: UAE is an effective treatment for PPH and PAH. Although UAE could preserve future fertility, careful attention should be paid to perinatal management for unusual complications.


Subject(s)
Postpartum Hemorrhage , Uterine Artery Embolization , Humans , Female , Adult , Uterine Artery Embolization/methods , Uterine Artery Embolization/adverse effects , Postpartum Hemorrhage/therapy , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Fertility , Abortion, Spontaneous , Young Adult , Pregnancy Outcome
4.
Rev Med Liege ; 79(3): 143-145, 2024 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487907

ABSTRACT

An intrauterine infection during the first trimester of pregnancy can rapidly lead to bacteremia, with severe consequences for the patient. While these infections are mainly found after a miscarriage or an abortion, the diagnosis is sometimes made while the pregnancy is still in progress. The clinical history and symptoms reported by the patient lead to the suspicion of such a complication. Treatment must be rapid and based on a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen covering Gram-negative, Gram-positive, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. As soon as the treatment has been initiated, uterine curettage should be performed to remove the infected material, whether or not foetal cardiac activity is present at the time of diagnosis.


Une infection intra-utérine durant le premier trimestre de la grossesse peut rapidement mener à une bactériémie et avoir des conséquences sévères pour la patiente. Alors que ces infections sont principalement retrouvées après une fausse couche ou une interruption volontaire de grossesse, le diagnostic est parfois posé alors que la grossesse est évolutive. L'histoire clinique et les symptômes rapportés par la patiente permettent de suspecter une telle complication. La prise en charge doit être rapide et repose sur un traitement antibiotique à large spectre couvrant les bactéries Gram négatif, Gram positif, les aérobies et les anaérobies. Dès le traitement instauré, un curetage utérin devra être réalisé afin d'éliminer le matériel infecté, que l'activité cardiaque fœtale soit présente ou non au moment du diagnostic.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Abortion, Spontaneous/surgery , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Uterus , Curettage/adverse effects
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37071, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457586

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Uterine rupture is extremely hazardous to both mothers and infants. Diagnosing silent uterine rupture in pregnant women without uterine contractions is challenging due to the presence of nonspecific symptoms, signs, and laboratory indicators. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the elevated risks associated with silent uterine rupture. PATIENT CONCERNS: on admission, case 1 was at 37 gestational weeks, having undergo laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage 8 months prior to the in vitro fertilization embryo transfer procedure, case 2 was at 38 4/7 gestational weeks with a history of 5 previous artificial abortion and 2 previous vaginal deliveries, case 3 was at 37 6/7 gestational weeks with a history of laparoscopic myomectomy. DIAGNOSES: The diagnosis of silent uterine rupture was based on clinical findings from cesarean delivery or laparoscopic exploration. INTERVENTIONS: Case 1 underwent emergent cesarean delivery, revealing a 0.25 cm × 0.25 cm narrow concave area above the Ring Ties with active and bright amniotic fluid flowing from the tear. Case 2 underwent vaginal delivery, and on the 12th postpartum day, ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5.8 cm × 3.3 cm × 2.3 cm lesion on the lower left posterior wall of the uterus, and 15th postpartum day, laparoscopic exploration confirmed the presence of an old rupture of uterus. Case 3 underwent elective cesarean delivery, revealing a 3.0 cm × 2.0 cm uterine rupture without active bleeding at the bottom of the uterus. OUTCOMES: The volumes of antenatal bleeding for the 3 patients were approximately 500 mL, 320 mL, and 400 mL, respectively. After silent uterine ruptures were detected, the uterine tear was routinely repaired. No maternal or neonatal complications were reported. LESSONS: Obstetricians should give particular consideration to the risk factors for silent uterine rupture, including a history of uterine surgery, such as laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage, laparoscopic myomectomy, and induced abortion.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Laparoscopy , Uterine Rupture , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Uterus , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects
6.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 63(2): 214-219, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: While the decision of abortion is undeniably complex, there are situations where it becomes a necessary choice. In such circumstances, a secure abortion procedure is essential to safeguard the physical and mental well-being of women. A uterine direct visualization system was designed to fulfill the requirements and this study undertook an assessment of the system's safety and effectiveness within a medical facility setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Induced abortion requested women in 17 institutions across the country between December 2016 and February 2017 were enrolled. Subjects were separated to the study and control group randomly. Induced abortion was conducted by a uterine direct visualization system and an ultrasound-guided system in the study and control group, respectively. The clinical indexes collected during intra- and post-procedures were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 392 and 339 subjects were included in the study and control group, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between two groups. Subjects in the study group had significant smaller number of uterine cavity entry (p < 0.001), less 2-h and 14-days postoperative bleeding (all p < 0.001), and less 14-days postoperative abdominal pain (p < 0.001). Significantly higher ratio of normal menstruation, in terms of incidence and duration after 60-days of operation, was observed in the study group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Induced abortion with uterine direct visualization system generate better outcome and less complication than the conventional ultrasound-guided abortion procedures.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abdominal Pain , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/surgery , Random Allocation
7.
Nat Med ; 30(4): 1191-1198, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361123

ABSTRACT

Telehealth abortion has become critical to addressing surges in demand in states where abortion remains legal but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is limited. California Home Abortion by Telehealth (CHAT) is a prospective study that follows pregnant people who obtained medication abortion via telehealth from three virtual clinics operating in 20 states and Washington, DC between April 2021 and January 2022. Individuals were screened using a standardized no-test protocol, primarily relying on their medical history to assess medical eligibility. We assessed effectiveness, defined as complete abortion after 200 mg mifepristone and 1,600 µg misoprostol (or lower) without additional intervention; safety was measured by the absence of serious adverse events. We estimated rates using multivariable logistic regression and multiple imputation to account for missing data. Among 6,034 abortions, 97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 97.2-98.1%) were complete without subsequent known intervention or ongoing pregnancy after the initial treatment. Overall, 99.8% (99.6-99.9%) of abortions were not followed by serious adverse events. In total, 0.25% of patients experienced a serious abortion-related adverse event, 0.16% were treated for an ectopic pregnancy and 1.3% abortions were followed by emergency department visits. There were no differences in effectiveness or safety between synchronous and asynchronous models of care. Telehealth medication abortion is effective, safe and comparable to published rates of in-person medication abortion care.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Misoprostol , Telemedicine , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , United States , Prospective Studies , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods , Mifepristone/adverse effects , Misoprostol/adverse effects
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 143, 2024 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368325

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Acknowledging the associated risk factors may have a positive impact on reducing the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP). In recent years, body mass index (BMI) has been mentioned in research. However, few studies are available and controversial on the relationship between EP and BMI. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the EP women as a case group and the deliveries as a control group in the central hospital of Wuhan during 2017 ~ 2021. χ2 test of variables associated with ectopic pregnancy was performed to find differences. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the association of the variables of age, parity, history of induced abortion, history of ectopic pregnancy, history of spontaneous abortion, history of appendectomy surgery and BMI (< 18.5 kg/m2, 18.5 ~ 24.9 kg/m2, 25 kg/m2 ~ 29.9 kg/m2, ≥ 30 kg /m2) with EP. RESULTS: They were 659 EP and 1460 deliveries. The variables of age, parity, history of induced abortion, history of ectopic pregnancy and BMI were different significantly(P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the variables of age > 35 years old [(OR (Odds Ratio), 5.415; 95%CI (Confidence Interval), 4.006 ~ 7.320, P < 0.001], history of ectopic pregnancy (OR, 3.944; 95%CI, 2.405 ~ 6.467; P < 0.001), history of induced abortion(OR, 3.365; 95%CI, 2.724 ~ 4.158, P < 0.001) and low BMI (< 18.5 kg/m2) (OR, 1.929; 95%CI, 1.416 ~ 2.628, P < 0.001])increased the risk of EP. CONCLUSION: The history of ectopic pregnancy, history of induced abortion and age > 35 years old were the risk factors with EP. In addition to these traditional factors, we found low BMI (< 18.5 kg/m2) with women may increase the risk to EP.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Pregnancy, Ectopic , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Body Mass Index , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Ectopic/etiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Risk Factors
9.
Obstet Gynecol Surv ; 79(1): 54-63, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306292

ABSTRACT

Importance: Several medications have been used to achieve medical abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. The most commonly used is the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol; however, different doses and routes of administration have been proposed. Objective: The aim of this study was to summarize published data on the effectiveness, adverse effects, and acceptability of the various combinations of mifepristone and misoprostol in medical abortion protocols in the first trimester of pregnancy. Evidence Acquisition: This was a comprehensive review, synthesizing the findings of the literature on the current use of mifepristone and misoprostol for first-trimester abortion. Results: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol seems to be more effective than misoprostol alone. Regarding the dosages and routes, mifepristone is administered orally, and the optimal dose is 200 mg. The route of administration of misoprostol varies; the sublingual and buccal routes are more effective; however, the vaginal route (800 µg) is associated with fewer adverse effects. Finally, the acceptability rates did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Different schemes for first-trimester medical abortion have been described so far. Future research needs to focus on identifying the method that offers the best trade-off between efficacy and safety in first-trimester medical abortion.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Mifepristone/adverse effects , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/adverse effects
10.
Hum Reprod ; 39(2): 326-334, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166353

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Do prepregnancy peripheral leukocytes (PPLs) and their subsets influence the risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB)? SUMMARY ANSWER: PPLs and their subsets are associated with the risk of SAB. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Compelling studies have revealed the crucial role of maternal peripheral leukocytes in embryo implantation and pregnancy maintenance. Adaptive changes are made by PPLs and their subsets after conception. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This population-based retrospective cohort study was based on data from the National Free Pre-pregnancy Check-up Project (NFPCP) in mainland China. Couples preparing for pregnancy within the next six months were provided with free prepregnancy health examinations and counseling services for reproductive health. The current study was based on 1 310 494 female NFPCP participants aged 20-49 who became pregnant in 2016. After sequentially excluding 235 456 participants lost to follow-up, with multiple births, and who failed to complete blood tests, a total of 1 075 038 participants were included in the primary analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: PPLs and their subset counts and ratios were measured. The main outcome was SAB. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of SAB associated with PPLs and their subsets, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to estimate the nonlinear exposure-response relationship. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the included pregnant participants, a total of 35 529 SAB events (3.30%) were recorded. Compared to participants with reference values of PPLs, the ORs (95% CIs) of leukopenia and leukocytosis for SAB were 1.14 (1.09-1.20) and 0.74 (0.69-0.79), respectively. The RCS result revealed a monotonous decreasing trend (Pnonlinear < 0.05). Similar relationships were observed for the neutrophil count and ratio, monocyte count, and middle-sized cell count and ratio. The lymphocyte ratio showed a positive and nonlinear relationship with the risk of SAB (Pnonlinear < 0.05). Both eosinophils and basophils showed positive relationships with the risk of SAB (eosinophil Pnonlinear > 0.05 and basophil Pnonlinear < 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Chemical abortion events and the cause of SAB were not collected at follow-up. Whether women with abnormal PPLs had recovered during periconception was not determined. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: PPLs and their subsets are associated with the risk of SAB. Leukopenia and neutropenia screening in women preparing for pregnancy and developing a feasible PPL stimulation approach should be emphasized to utilize the immune window of opportunity to prevent SAB. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was approved by the Institutional Research Review Board of the National Health and Family Planning Commission. This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grants 2021YFC2700705 [Y.Y.] and 2016YFC100307 [X.M.]) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82003472 [L.W.]). The funding source was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing the report, or the decision to submit this article for publication. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Leukopenia , Pregnancy , Animals , Female , Humans , Horses , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Leukocytes , Leukopenia/complications
11.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(3): 1182-1188, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217092

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether routine intraoperative ultrasonographic guidance during second-trimester dilatation and evacuation (D&E) reduces procedure-related complications in an Ethiopian setting. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post study on routine ultrasonography during second-trimester D&E at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia). Second-trimester D&E cases that were managed at the hospital between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed by grouping them into an intervention group (using routine ultrasound intraoperatively for all cases) and a non-intervention group (problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound, where ultrasound was used in problem cases only). SPSS version 23 was used for analysis and simple descriptive statistics, χ2 test, multivariate regression analysis, and Fisher exact test were performed as appropriate. P values less than 0.05 and odds ratio with 95% CI were used to present the results' significance. RESULTS: A total of 242 second-trimester D&E cases were analyzed (84 cases managed under routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance and 158 cases managed with a problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound). Compared with problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound (using it only in selected cases), routine intraoperative ultrasound use was not associated with a decrease in D&E complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-1.16). The two factors associated with increased D&E procedure complications were advanced gestational age (aOR 13.52, 95% CI 1.86-98.52), and need for additional mechanical cervical dilatation during the D&E procedure (aOR 9.53, 95% CI 1.32-69.07). Provider experience, cervical preparation methods (laminaria vs Foley), and maternal age were not associated with occurrence of D&E complications. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the preference of routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance over problem-based (in selected cases) intraoperative ultrasound use during the second-trimester D&E procedure. More research is needed to make a strong clinical recommendation on using routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance during all second-trimester D&E procedures.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Ethiopia , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Young Adult , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Dilatation and Curettage/methods , Dilatation and Curettage/adverse effects , Intraoperative Care/methods
12.
Womens Health Issues ; 34(1): 45-50, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479629

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The general public and abortion patients in the United States have misinformation about the risks of infertility associated with abortion, which may influence abortion care-seeking. METHODS: The Google Ads Abortion Access Study was a national study of people considering abortion and searching online for information. Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys, providing free text responses to questions about barriers and facilitators to abortion. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the free text responses related to fertility and used thematic analysis to identify concerns raised about links between abortion and future fertility. RESULTS: Of 864 participants who provided free text responses in the follow-up survey, 32 specifically mentioned fertility. Few expressed fear that complications from the abortion procedure would somehow lead to infertility; rather, most discussed complex and overlapping thoughts about how abortion factored into their reproductive life plans. These included age-related concerns, missing out on their "chance" to have a child, fear of being punished by God with infertility for having an abortion, and conflicting emotions if they had previously been told they were subfecund or infertile. CONCLUSION: Although previous research has focused on misinformation about the link between abortion and infertility, participants in this study rarely mentioned it as a concern. Researchers and practitioners should be attuned to the distinctions people make between infertility occurring as a result of abortion and other fears they might have about not achieving their future reproductive aspirations, ask questions, and provide counseling accordingly.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Infertility , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Fear , Fertility , Reproduction , United States/epidemiology
13.
BJOG ; 131(3): 319-326, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667661

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether letrozole pre-treatment is non-inferior to mifepristone pre-treatment, followed by misoprostol, for complete evacuation in the medical treatment of first-trimester missed miscarriage. DESIGN: Prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital. POPULATION: We recruited 294 women diagnosed with first-trimester missed miscarriage who opted for medical treatment. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to: (i) the mifepristone group, who received 200 mg mifepristone orally followed 24-48 h later by 800 µg misoprostol vaginally; or (ii) the letrozole group, who received 10 mg letrozole orally once-a-day for 3 days, followed by 800 µg misoprostol vaginally on the third (i.e. last) day of letrozole administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of complete evacuation without surgical intervention at 42 days post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-expulsion interval, adverse effects, women's satisfaction, number of doses of misoprostol required, duration of vaginal bleeding, pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and other adverse events. RESULTS: The complete evacuation rates were 97.8% (95% CI 95.1%-100%) and 97.2% (95% CI 94.4%-99.9%) in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively (p ≤ 0.001 for non-inferiority). The mean induction-to-tissue expulsion interval in the letrozole group was longer compared with the mifepristone group (15.4 vs 9.0 h) (p = 0.03). The letrozole group had less heavy post-treatment bleeding and an earlier return of menses. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of doses of misoprostol required, the duration of vaginal bleeding, the pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and the rate of other adverse events between the two groups. The majority of the women (91.2% and 93.9% in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively) were satisfied with their treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole is non-inferior to mifepristone as a pre-treatment, followed by misoprostol, for the medical treatment of first-trimester missed miscarriage.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Abortion, Incomplete , Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Letrozole , Mifepristone , Pain/etiology , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology
14.
Biomol Biomed ; 24(1): 153-158, 2024 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597215

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of combining pelvic floor neuromuscular stimulation treatment (NMES) with sodium hyaluronate in preventing intrauterine adhesions (IUA) following abortion. A total of 140 women who underwent artificial abortion were enrolled. The control group received only an intrauterine injection of sodium hyaluronate post-surgery, while the observation group received both the injection and daily pelvic floor NMES treatments, beginning on the day after the abortion. Monthly follow-ups on menstrual conditions were conducted for six months post-surgery. Fasting venous blood samples from both groups were collected on the second day post-abortion and the day after treatment. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound was used on the second day post-abortion and the 15th day post the first menstrual cycle to measure endometrial thickness, and the pulsatility and resistance indices of the endometrial spiral arteries. Over the six-month follow-up, the combination therapy group exhibited a notably lower IUA incidence compared to the control group (2.8% vs. 15.7%). Furthermore, combined treatment significantly expedited post-abortion menstrual recovery, reduced vaginal bleeding volume and duration (P < 0.001). It also increased endometrial thickness and reduced the endometrial spiral artery's pulsatility and resistance indices (P < 0.05). In addition, lower serum tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and higher interleukin-10 (IL-10) were found in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The combination therapy offers significant advantages in preventing and reducing IUA after abortion, resulting in a substantial reduction in IUA occurrence.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Uterine Diseases , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/pharmacology , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Diseases/drug therapy , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Spontaneous/drug therapy , Electric Stimulation/adverse effects
15.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(1): 102705, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National French Assembly promoted a law in 2022 allowing an extension of the period of abortion up to 16 week's amenorrhea. Medication protocols vary internationally, and there are no French data on medical management between 14- and 16-weeks' amenorrhea. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and feasibility of a medical management abortion between 14 and 16 weeks of amenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively collected data from women undergoing medical abortion between 14 and 16 weeks' amenorrhea from April 2022 to April 2023 in Archet's University hospital, Nice, France. Medical protocol consisted in a single dose of oral mifepristone 600 mg and 36-48 h later, vaginal gemeprost 1 mg. Three hours after gemeprost, oral 400 µg of misoprostol were administered every three hours, to a maximum of three doses. Success was defined as fetal expulsion. RESULTS: Thirty women were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine (96.7 %) patients aborted successfully. The median dose of misoprostol required was 800 µg (400 µg -1200 µg) and the median induction-to-abortion interval after first prostaglandin administration was 7 h (5.5-11.6). One patient (3.3 %) didn't expulse the fetus after 3 doses of misoprostol. Nine patients (30.0 %) had additional surgical aspiration for retained product of conception within 24 h. We encountered one post-abortum hemorrhage controlled only with surgical intra uterine aspiration. We did not need complementary hemostatic procedure and we reported no immediate or late complication. CONCLUSIONS: Medical abortion between 14 and 16 weeks of amenorrhea provides a noninvasive and effective management for a daycare mid trimester abortion in 96.7 % of cases, with a 36.7 % of risk of staying in hospital overnight and 30.0 % to have additional surgery for retained product of conception (RPOC).


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Amenorrhea/etiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods
16.
Contraception ; 129: 110292, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37739302

ABSTRACT

Hemorrhage after abortion is rare, occurring in fewer than 1% of abortions, but associated morbidity may be significant. Although medication abortion is associated with more bleeding than procedural abortion, overall bleeding for the two methods is minimal and not clinically different. Hemorrhage can be caused by atony, coagulopathy, and abnormal placentation, as well as by such procedure complications as perforation, cervical laceration, and retained tissue. Evidence for practices around postabortion hemorrhage is extremely limited. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative identification of individuals at high risk of hemorrhage as well as development of an organized approach to treatment. Specifically, individuals with a uterine scar and complete placenta previa seeking abortion at gestations after the first trimester should be evaluated for placenta accreta spectrum. For those at high risk of hemorrhage, referral to a higher-acuity center should be considered. We propose an algorithm for treating postabortion hemorrhage as follows: (1) assessment and examination, (2) uterine massage and medical therapy, (3) resuscitative measures with laboratory evaluation and possible reaspiration or balloon tamponade, and (4) interventions such as embolization and surgery. Evidence supports the use of oxytocin as prophylaxis for bleeding with dilation and evacuation; methylergonovine prophylaxis, however, is associated with more bleeding at the time of dilation and evacuation. Future research is needed on tranexamic acid as prophylaxis and treatment and misoprostol as prophylaxis. Structural inequities contribute to bleeding risk. Acknowledging how our policies hinder or remedy health inequities is essential when developing new guidelines and approaches to clinical services.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Family Planning Services , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Hemorrhage , Uterus
17.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 863, 2023 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the predictive value of ultrasound indicators in early pregnancy for the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after pregnancy termination. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the ultrasound images of 98 CSP patients who underwent transabdominal ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic curettage during early pregnancy at Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care between January 2017 and October 2021. Patients were equally divided into a case group and a control group. The case group included 49 CSP patients with postoperative complications, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 ml or retained products of conception (RPOC). The remaining 49 CSP patients, with similar age and gestational age and with good postoperative outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss ≤ 50 ml and no RPOC, were included in the control group. CSP was classified into three types according to the location of the gestational sac (GS) relative to the uterine cavity line (UCL) and serosal contour. Differences in ultrasound indicators between the case and control group were compared. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the case and control groups in the mean gestational sac diameter (MGSD), residual myometrium thickness (RMT) between the GS and the bladder, blood flow around the GS at the site of the previous caesarean incision, and types of CSP (P < 0.05). The rs of each ultrasound indicator were as follows: 0.258, -0.485, 0.369, 0.350. The optimal threshold for predicting good postoperative outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss ≤ 50 ml and no RPOC, by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the RMT was 2.3 mm. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the RMT, blood flow around the GS at the site of the previous caesarean incision, and types of CSP have a low correlation with postoperative complications, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 ml or RPOC, of early pregnancy termination in patients with CSP. To some extent, this study may be helpful for clinical prognostic prediction of patients with CSP and formulation of treatment strategies. Given the low correlation between these three indicators and postoperative complications, further studies are needed to identify indicators that can better reflect the postoperative outcomes of CSP patients.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy, Ectopic , Pregnancy , Female , Child , Humans , Blood Loss, Surgical , Retrospective Studies , Cicatrix/etiology , Cicatrix/complications , Ultrasonics , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Ectopic/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy, Ectopic/etiology , Pregnancy, Ectopic/surgery , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMC Womens Health ; 23(1): 586, 2023 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy or within one year after the end of pregnancy is a major clinical and public health issue. The current study aimed at estimating the incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) and assessing whether the risk of abortion is increased in women diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used the regional healthcare utilization (HCU) databases of Lombardy, the largest region in Italy, to identify the women who delivered between 2010 and 2020. PAC were identified by oncological ICD-9-CM codes reported in the hospital discharge forms. We computed the ratio of PAC cases to the total number of pregnancies. Following a diagnosis of PAC, the prevalence ratio (PR) of abortion and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), was estimated using a log-binomial model adjusted for maternal age. RESULTS: During the study period, 926 women who gave birth (1.29 cases per 1000 births) and 341 women who had an abortion (1.52 cases per 1000 abortions) were diagnosed with PAC. Regardless of the outcome of pregnancy, the risk of PAC increased with increasing age. The rate of PAC was initially lower among births, but it came very close to the rate of PAC among abortions in the last two calendar years. The proportion of abortions among women with PAC gradually decreased from 27.7% in 2010-2012 to 18.5% in 2019-2020 (p-value < 0.001). Overall, a diagnosis of PAC was related to an approximately 10% increased risk of abortion (PR = 1.11, 95%CI:1.01-1.22). However, no association was observed in 2019-2020 (PR = 0.87, 95%CI:0.65-1.17). Considering only diagnoses made during the first trimester of pregnancy, the risk of abortion was about 2.5 times higher (PR = 2.53, 95%CI:2.05-3.11) and the risk of induced abortion was almost 4 times higher (PR = 3.71, 95%CI:2.82-4.90). CONCLUSION: In this population the risk of abortion was about 10% higher in women with PAC than in women without PAC. However, this association tended to decrease in more recent calendar periods. This trend seemed to be influenced more by spontaneous than by induced abortions.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Cohort Studies , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic
19.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 35(6): 490-495, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37873766

ABSTRACT

The safety and efficacy of medical abortion in the second trimester is provider independent and may therefore offer advantages over surgical second trimester abortion in certain settings. Due to bleeding risk, medical abortions in the second trimester are still mostly performed in a clinic or hospital setting. The most effective regimen for abortion includes pretreatment with oral mifepristone and following doses of misoprostol. An alternative is misoprostol only which should only be used when mifepristone is not available. The optimal dosing of prostaglandin to achieve the highest efficacy with the lowest proportion of complications remains to be established. Complications are rare and serious adverse events uncommon but may include uterine rupture especially in women with a previous cesarean delivery or uterine surgery. Women having second trimester medical abortion are a diverse group with different indications for the abortion. All women should be offered pain relief and respectful care. Staff involved in second trimester medical abortion often find their work challenging. At the same time, staff indicate pride and a conviction of contributing to the 'greater good' for women and society. Staff involved in second trimester abortion should be offered guidance and support through the employer. Post abortion contraception should be offered to all women having second trimester medical abortions, including those who have the abortion due to fetal malformation. All methods of contraception can be started immediately after a second trimester medical abortion except for cycle based methods and diaphragms.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Mifepristone , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods , Prostaglandins
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(6): 1357-1364, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884011

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk difference of uterine rupture when using current mifepristone and misoprostol regimens for second-trimester abortion among individuals with prior cesarean birth compared with those without prior cesarean birth. DATA SOURCES: We searched the terms second trimester, induction, mifepristone, and abortion in PubMed, EMBASE, POPLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Library from inception until December 2022. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials and observational studies including a mixed cohort, with and without uterine scar, of individuals at 14-28 weeks of gestation who used mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy or to manage a fetal death. We excluded case reports, narrative reviews, and studies not published in English. Two reviewers independently screened studies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Absolute risks with binomial CIs were calculated from pooled data. Using R software, we estimated total risk difference by the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method without continuity correction. For studies with zero events, a continuity correction of 0.5 was applied for individual risk differences and plotted graphically with forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I2 statistics. Funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Of 198 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria: seven randomized trials (n=923) and 15 observational studies (n=6,195). Uterine rupture risk with prior cesarean birth was 1.1% (10/874) (95% CI 0.6-2.1) and without prior cesarean birth was 0.01% (2/6,244) (95% CI 0.0-0.12). The risk difference was 1.23% (95% CI 0.46-2.00, I2 =0%). Of the 12 reported uterine ruptures, three resulted in hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture with mifepristone and misoprostol use during second-trimester induction abortion is rare, with the risk increased to 1% in individuals with prior cesarean birth. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022302626.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Misoprostol , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Mifepristone/adverse effects , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Uterine Rupture/chemically induced , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...