Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 8.905
Filter
1.
Kit de ferramentas de transformação digitalOPAS/EIH/IS/dtt-kt/23-0004.
Monography in Portuguese | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-59556

ABSTRACT

Um dos oito princípios orientadores da transformação digital no setor da saúde promovidos pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) é a conectividade. Esta sinopse de políticas apresenta conceitos-chave, linhas de ação recomendadas e indicadores para monitoramento, com o objetivo de avançar na conectividade universal.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Internet Access , Access to Information
2.
Kit de ferramentas de transformação digitalOPAS/EIH/IS/23-0003.
Monography in Portuguese | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-59555

ABSTRACT

Um dos oito princípios orientadores para a transformação digital no setor de saúde promovidos pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) é a inteligência artificial (IA). Esta sinopse de políticas apresenta conceitos-chave, linhas de ação recomendadas e indicadores para monitoramento, com o objetivo de avançar na IA.


Subject(s)
Digital Health , Artificial Intelligence , Access to Information
3.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302787, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718077

ABSTRACT

To monitor the sharing of research data through repositories is increasingly of interest to institutions and funders, as well as from a meta-research perspective. Automated screening tools exist, but they are based on either narrow or vague definitions of open data. Where manual validation has been performed, it was based on a small article sample. At our biomedical research institution, we developed detailed criteria for such a screening, as well as a workflow which combines an automated and a manual step, and considers both fully open and restricted-access data. We use the results for an internal incentivization scheme, as well as for a monitoring in a dashboard. Here, we describe in detail our screening procedure and its validation, based on automated screening of 11035 biomedical research articles, of which 1381 articles with potential data sharing were subsequently screened manually. The screening results were highly reliable, as witnessed by inter-rater reliability values of ≥0.8 (Krippendorff's alpha) in two different validation samples. We also report the results of the screening, both for our institution and an independent sample from a meta-research study. In the largest of the three samples, the 2021 institutional sample, underlying data had been openly shared for 7.8% of research articles. For an additional 1.0% of articles, restricted-access data had been shared, resulting in 8.3% of articles overall having open and/or restricted-access data. The extraction workflow is then discussed with regard to its applicability in different contexts, limitations, possible variations, and future developments. In summary, we present a comprehensive, validated, semi-automated workflow for the detection of shared research data underlying biomedical article publications.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Workflow , Biomedical Research/methods , Humans , Information Dissemination/methods , Access to Information , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Clin Ethics ; 35(2): 85-92, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728697

ABSTRACT

AbstractDespite broad ethical consensus supporting developmentally appropriate disclosure of health information to older children and adolescents, cases in which parents and caregivers request nondisclosure continue to pose moral dilemmas for clinicians. State laws vary considerably regarding adolescents' rights to autonomy, privacy, and confidentiality, with many states not specifically addressing adolescents' right to their own healthcare information. The requirements of the 21st Century Cures Act have raised important ethical concerns for pediatricians and adolescent healthcare professionals regarding the protection of adolescent privacy and confidentiality, given requirements that chart notes and results be made readily available to patients via electronic portals. Less addressed have been the implications of the act for adolescents' access to their health information, since many healthcare systems' electronic portals are available to patients beginning at age 12, sometimes requiring that the patients themselves authorize their parents' access to the same information. In this article, we present a challenging case of protracted disagreement about an adolescent's right to honest information regarding his devastating prognosis. We then review the legal framework governing adolescents' rights to their own healthcare information, the limitations of ethics consultation to resolve such disputes, and the potential for the Cures Act's impact on electronic medical record systems to provide one form of resolution. We conclude that although parents in cases like the one presented here have the legal right to consent to medical treatment on their children's behalf, they do not have a corresponding right to direct the withholding of medical information from the patient.


Subject(s)
Confidentiality , Parents , Humans , Adolescent , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/ethics , Male , United States , Disclosure/legislation & jurisprudence , Disclosure/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Parental Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Parental Consent/ethics , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Electronic Health Records/ethics , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Access to Information/legislation & jurisprudence , Access to Information/ethics
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410171, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713467

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study evaluates the information on a circulating tumor DNA test available to the public on popular internet resources.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Humans , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged
6.
BMC Med Ethics ; 25(1): 51, 2024 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706004

ABSTRACT

Data access committees (DAC) gatekeep access to secured genomic and related health datasets yet are challenged to keep pace with the rising volume and complexity of data generation. Automated decision support (ADS) systems have been shown to support consistency, compliance, and coordination of data access review decisions. However, we lack understanding of how DAC members perceive the value add of ADS, if any, on the quality and effectiveness of their reviews. In this qualitative study, we report findings from 13 semi-structured interviews with DAC members from around the world to identify relevant barriers and facilitators to implementing ADS for genomic data access management. Participants generally supported pilot studies that test ADS performance, for example in cataloging data types, verifying user credentials and tagging datasets for use terms. Concerns related to over-automation, lack of human oversight, low prioritization, and misalignment with institutional missions tempered enthusiasm for ADS among the DAC members we engaged. Tensions for change in institutional settings within which DACs operated was a powerful motivator for why DAC members considered the implementation of ADS into their access workflows, as well as perceptions of the relative advantage of ADS over the status quo. Future research is needed to build the evidence base around the comparative effectiveness and decisional outcomes of institutions that do/not use ADS into their workflows.


Subject(s)
Genomics , Qualitative Research , Humans , Access to Information/ethics , Interviews as Topic , Automation , Decision Support Techniques
7.
Science ; 384(6697): 726, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753794

ABSTRACT

Universities could no longer store Medicare and Medicaid data, and costs would rise.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Medicare , United States , Medicare/economics , Access to Information , Humans , Universities
8.
Sci Data ; 11(1): 501, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750048

ABSTRACT

The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements have prompted a shift from centralised controlled access genome-phenome archives to federated models for sharing sensitive human data. In a data-sharing federation, a central node facilitates data discovery; meanwhile, distributed nodes are responsible for handling data access requests, concluding agreements with data users and providing secure access to the data. Research institutions that want to become part of such federations often lack the resources to set up the required controlled access processes. The DS-PACK tool assembly is a reusable, open-source middleware solution that semi-automates controlled access processes end-to-end, from data submission to access. Data protection principles are engraved into all components of the DS-PACK assembly. DS-PACK centralises access control management and distributes access control enforcement with support for data access via cloud-based applications. DS-PACK is in production use at the ELIXIR Luxembourg data hosting platform, combined with an operational model including legal facilitation and data stewardship.


Subject(s)
Information Dissemination , Humans , Access to Information , Computer Security , Software
11.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(5): e241284, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819795

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint discusses how proposed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data access changes may impede health services research.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Health Services Research , Humans , United States , Health Services Research/organization & administration
12.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(5): e241281, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819796

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint describes the potential consequences of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS') proposed data access policy change for graduate students and early-career researchers.


Subject(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Research Personnel , Humans , United States , Access to Information
14.
JAMA ; 331(16): 1347-1349, 2024 04 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578617

ABSTRACT

This Medical News article is an interview with JAMA Editor in Chief Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo and Virologist Davey Smith, head of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Artificial Intelligence , Health Inequities , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Public Health , Humans , Electronic Health Records , Medical Informatics , Public Health Informatics
15.
Pediatrics ; 153(5)2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined how parents experience and navigate open access to clinical notes ("open notes") in their child's electronic health record and explored their interactions with clinicians during an ICU admission. METHODS: We performed a qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews of English-speaking parents who accessed their child's clinical notes during a pediatric ICU (general or cardiac) admission. We included patient-parent dyads with an ICU admission ≥48 hours between April 2021 and December 2022, note access by proxy timestamp during the ICU course, and either patient age <12 years or incapacitated adolescent ages 12 to 21 years. Purposive sampling was based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Phone interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive thematic codebook analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 parents and identified 2 thematic categories, outcomes and interactions, in parents accessing clinical notes. Themes of outcomes included applied benefits, psychosocial and emotional value, and negative consequences. Themes of interactions included practical limitations and parental approach and appraisal. The ICU context and power dynamics were a meta-theme, influencing multiple themes. All parents reported positive qualities of note access despite negative consequences related to content, language, burdens, and lack of support. Parents suggested practice and design improvements surrounding open note access. CONCLUSIONS: Parental experiences with open notes reveal new, unaddressed considerations for documentation access, practices, and purpose. Parents leverage open notes by negotiating between the power dynamics in the ICU and the uncertain boundaries of their role and authority in the electronic health record.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Parents , Qualitative Research , Humans , Parents/psychology , Female , Male , Adolescent , Child , Young Adult , Adult , Professional-Family Relations , Interviews as Topic , Access to Information
16.
Sex Reprod Health Matters ; 32(1): 2336770, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647261

ABSTRACT

Access to sexual health services and information is critical to achieving the highest attainable standard of sexual health, and enabling legal environments are key to advancing progress in this area. In determining overall alignment with human rights standards to respect, protect, and fulfil sexual health-related rights without discrimination, there are many aspects of laws, including their specificity and content, which impact which sexual health services and information are availed, which are restricted, and for whom. To understand the nature of existing legal provisions surrounding access to sexual health services and information, we analysed the content of 40 laws in English, French, and Spanish from 18 countries for the specific sexual health services and information to which access is ensured or prohibited, and the non-discrimination provisions within these laws. Overall, there was wide variation across countries in the types of laws covering these services and the types and number of services and information ensured. Some countries covered different services through multiple laws, and most of the laws dedicated specifically to sexual health addressed only a narrow aspect of sexual health and covered a small range of services. The protected characteristics in non-discrimination provisions and the specificity of these provisions with regard to sexual health services also varied. Findings may inform national legal and policy dialogues around sexual health to identify opportunities for positive change, as well as to guide further investigation to understand the relationship between such legal provisions, the implementation of these laws within countries, and relevant sexual health outcomes.


Access to sexual health services and information is important to being able to have good sexual health. Laws are relevant because what they include and how specific they are affects what types of sexual health services people can access, what types of services are illegal, and whether or not all people can access services equally. We reviewed 40 laws in English, French, and Spanish from 18 countries to understand how many and which sexual health services and information countries ensure in their laws, which sexual health services are illegal, and which people are protected from discrimination in accessing these services. We found that countries use many different types of laws to ensure access to sexual health services or information, and most countries do not cover the same types or number of sexual health services. There are also differences in which people are specifically protected from discrimination in the laws we reviewed. These findings are important because they may help countries identify ways that access to sexual health services and information could be improved so as to improve people's sexual health. They may also guide future research.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Sexual Health , Humans , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Sexual Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Access to Information/legislation & jurisprudence
17.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1378412, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651120

ABSTRACT

Public health institutions rely on the access to social media data to better understand the dynamics and impact of infodemics - an overabundance of information during a disease outbreak, potentially including mis-and disinformation. The scope of the COVID-19 infodemic has led to growing concern in the public health community. The spread of harmful information or information voids may negatively impact public health. In this context, social media are of particular relevance as an integral part of our society, where much information is consumed. In this perspective paper, we discuss the current state of (in)accessibility of social media data of the main platforms in the European Union. The European Union's relatively new Digital Services Act introduces the obligation for platforms to provide data access to a wide range of researchers, likely including researchers at public health institutions without formal academic affiliation. We examined eight platforms (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Snapchat, TikTok, X, YouTube) affected by the new legislation in regard to data accessibility. We found that all platforms apart from TikTok offer data access through the Digital Services Act. Potentially, this presents a fundamentally new situation for research, as before the Digital Services Act, few platforms granted data access or only to very selective groups of researchers. The access regime under the Digital Services Act is, however, still evolving. Specifics such as the application procedure for researcher access are still being worked out and results can be expected in spring 2024. The impact of the Digital Services Act on research will therefore only become fully apparent in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , European Union , Public Health , Social Media , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Information Dissemination , Access to Information
18.
Infect Dis Now ; 54(4): 104909, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While Open Access (OA) journals provide free access to articles, they entail high article processing charges (APC), limiting opportunities for young researchers and those from low-middle income countries to publish OA. METHODS: Cross-sectional study, evaluating APC and academic impact of full OA (FOA) journals in infectious diseases (ID) and clinical microbiology (CM) compared to hybrid journals. Data were collected from Journal Citation Reports and journals' websites. RESULTS: Among 255 journals, median APC was 2850 (interquartile range [IQR] 1325-3654$). Median APC for 120 FOA journals was significantly lower than for 119 hybrid journals (2000, IQR 648-2767$ versus 3550, IQR 2948-4120$, p < 0.001). FOA journals had lower citation numbers and impact metrics compared to hybrid journals. CONCLUSION: While FOA ID/CM journals have lower APCs, they also lower academic impact compared to hybrid journals. These findings highlight the need for reforms in the publication process in view of achieving equitable data dissemination.


Subject(s)
Periodicals as Topic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Microbiology , Journal Impact Factor , Open Access Publishing , Access to Information , Bibliometrics , Publishing/statistics & numerical data
19.
RECIIS (Online) ; 18(1)jan.-mar. 2024.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Coleciona SUS | ID: biblio-1552963

ABSTRACT

O fenômeno da judicialização da saúde carece de dados organizados e comparáveis entre estudos sobre o tema. Diversas fontes, recortes prévios e intermediários geram resultados conflitantes e de difícil repro-dução. Esta nota argumenta a necessidade de definir um padrão/elemento comum nos processos judiciais em saúde, propondo o sistema JUDJe, que utiliza o Diário de Justiça Eletrônico para extrair, organizar e classificar esses dados. O JUDJe gerou um banco de dados aberto com 100 mil movimentações processuais sobre casos de câncer. Defende mais qualidade e conexão dos dados, e mais acesso a esses últimos, pro-movendo equidade e visão multidimensional. Propõe a "judicialização 2.0" com dados em rede conectando saúde e direito.


The phenomenon of health judicialisation lacks organised and comparable data between studies on the subject. Different sources, previous and intermediate pieces of information generate conflicting results that are difficult to reproduce. This note argues the need to define a common standard/element in health lawsuits and proposes the JUDJe system, using the online Official Gazette to extract, organize and classify such data. JUDJe generated an open geo-referenced database with 100 thousand legal proceedings on cancer cases. It advocates more quality and connection of data, and more access to them, promoting equity and a multidimensional vision. It proposes a "judicialization 2.0" connecting the health and law domains.


El fenómeno de la judicialización de la salud carece de datos organizables y comparables entre los estudios sobre el tema. Diferentes fuentes, cortes previos y intermedios generan resultados contradictorios y dificiles de reproduzir. Esta nota argumenta la necesidad de definir un elemento común/estándar en los procesos judiciales de salud, proponiendo el sistema JUDJe, que utiliza el Diario Oficial Electrónico de Justicia para extraer, organizar y clasificar esos datos. El JUDJe generó una base de datos abiertos georreferenciada con 100 mil actuaciones judiciales sobre casos de cáncer. Defiende más calidad y conexión de datos, y más acceso a esos últimos, promoviendo la equidad y una visión multidimensional. Propone la "judicialización 2.0" con datos en red que conecten salud y derecho.


Subject(s)
Information Storage and Retrieval , Information Management , Database , Health's Judicialization , Data Aggregation , Information Science , Access to Information
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...