Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(4): 665-670, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31894353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acetabular remodeling may not be predictable after open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in older children. Several acetabuloplasties have been developed, and all are aimed at correcting the dysplastic acetabulum. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the type of pelvic acetabuloplasty and the corrected (postoperative) acetabular index (AI) affect early follow-up femoral head coverage. METHODS: A retrospective review of single-surgeon consecutive acetabuloplasties (Dega or Pemberton) from December 2012 to December 2015 was conducted. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of DDH, undergoing simultaneous primary open reduction, and follow-up of at least 18 months. Univariable analysis was based on the type of acetabuloplasty. The correlation between AI and final center edge angle (CEA) was tested. Multiple regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the total 58 hips in 39 patients included, 41 underwent Dega acetabuloplasty, and 17 had Pemberton acetabuloplasty. The median follow-up was 40.50 months (interquartile range 27.25-57). Pemberton acetabuloplasty produced a lower corrected AI, but the difference was not significant in follow-up measurements. Corrected AI was significantly correlated with final CEA (R = - 0.31, P = 0.018). In the multiple regression, only corrected AI was independently associated with final CEA (B = - 0.29, SE = 0.15, P = 0.06), whereas the type of acetabuloplasty, age, and preoperative severity of the dislocation were not. CONCLUSION: The correction obtained during acetabuloplasty affects early follow-up femoral head coverage. Ensuring proper sizing and placement of the grafted bone is probably more important than the type of acetabuloplasty chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Acetabuloplasty , Acetabulum , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Osteotomy , Postoperative Complications , Acetabuloplasty/adverse effects , Acetabuloplasty/classification , Acetabuloplasty/methods , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/physiopathology , Acetabulum/surgery , Aftercare/methods , Child, Preschool , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/diagnosis , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/physiopathology , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/surgery , Female , Femur Head/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnosis , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Osteotomy/methods , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recurrence , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...