Early and mid-term results of Tönnis lateral acetabuloplasty for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present the clinical and radiological results of a large patient group operated by Tönnis lateral acetabuloplasty (TLA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted with 66 hips of 41 patients (5 males, 36 females; mean age: 32.3±18 months; range, 11 to 132 months) operated for DDH using the TLA technique in a single center between February 2012 and December 2016. Adductor tenotomy was performed on 52 (79%) hips. There was a need for additional femoral shortening and derotation-varization osteotomy in 14 (21%) hips. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with modified McKay criteria. The acetabular index and lateral migration index for the subluxated hip were calculated, and the femoral head position was evaluated according to Perkin's line and Shenton's line. The Severin classification was used to assess the outcome of the hips. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 27±11 months. According to the modified McKay criteria for DDH, 77.3% of hips were classified as excellent, 16.6% as good, and 6.1% as fair. The mean acetabular index decreased from 36.1° preoperatively to 18.6° postoperatively. The mean postoperative improvement for the acetabular index was 17.5±5. The lateral migration index improved from 89.7 to 10.6%. A statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative and postoperative measurements of the acetabular index and lateral migration index (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Tönnis lateral acetabuloplasty was found to be safe and effective with a low learning curve, and successful treatment decreases the duration of follow-up required in patients with DDH.

Does Adding Femoral Lengthening at the Time of Rotation Hip Transposition After Periacetabular Tumor Resection Allow for Restoration of Limb Length and Function? Interim Results of a Modified Hip Transposition Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection of the acetabulum is challenging. Previous methods of hip transposition after acetabular resection have the advantages of reducing wound complications and infections of the allograft or metal endoprosthesis but were associated with substantial limb length discrepancy. We therefore developed a modification of this procedure, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening, to address limb length, and we wished to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of complications and functional outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we asked: (1) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after this reconstruction method was used? (2) What complications occurred after this reconstruction method was used? (3) What proportion of patients achieved solid arthrodesis (as opposed to pseudarthrosis) with the sacrum and solid union of the femur? (4) What were the results with respect to limb length after a minimum follow-up of 2 years? METHODS: From 2011 to 2017, 83 patients with an aggressive benign or primary malignant tumor involving the acetabulum were treated in our institution. Of those, 23% (19 of 83) were treated with rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening and were considered for this retrospective study; 15 were available at a minimum follow-up of 2 years (median [range], 49 months [24 to 97 months]), and four died of lung metastases before 2 years. No patients were lost to follow-up before 2 years. During the period in question, the general indications for this approach were primary nonmetastatic malignant bone tumor or a locally aggressive benign bone tumor that could not be treated adequately with curettage. There were seven men and 12 women with a median age of 43 years. Nine patients underwent Zones I + II resection, eight patients had Zones I + II + III resection, and two received Zones II + III resection. After tumor resection, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction was performed, which included two steps. The first step was to lengthen the femur with the insertion of an allograft. Two methods were used to achieve limb lengthening: a "Z" osteotomy and a transverse osteotomy. The second step was to take the hip transposition and rotate the femoral head posteriorly 10° to 20°. The median (range) operative time was 510 minutes (330 to 925 minutes). The median intraoperative blood loss was 4000 mL (1800 to 7000 mL). We performed a chart review on the 15 available patients for clinical and radiographic assessment of functional outcomes and complications. Arthrodesis and leg length discrepancy were evaluated radiographically. RESULTS: The median (range) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 21 points (17 to 30). Eleven of 19 patients developed procedure-related complications, including six patients with allograft nonunion, two with deep infection, two with delayed skin healing, and one with a hematoma. Two patients had minor additional surgical interventions without the removal of any implants. Local recurrences developed in four patients, and all four died of disease. All seven patients treated with a Z osteotomy had bone union. Among the eight patients with transverse osteotomy, bone union did not occur in six patients. After hip transposition, stable iliofemoral arthrodesis was achieved in seven patients. Pseudarthrosis developed in the remaining eight patients. The median (range) lower limb length discrepancy at the last follow-up visit or death was 8 mm (1 to 42 mm). CONCLUSION: Although complex and challenging, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction with a Z osteotomy provides acceptable functional outcomes with complications that are within expectations for resection of pelvic tumors involving the acetabulum. Because of the magnitude and complexity of this technique, we believe it should be used primarily for patients with a favorable prognosis, both locally and systemically. This innovative procedure may be useful to other surgeons if larger numbers of patients and longer-term follow-up confirm our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment provides significant improvement in FAI patients.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using the technique of initial access to the peripheral compartment. It is based on a single surgeon large case series with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal study with consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were the presence of FAI syndrome that had failed non-operative treatment and had a hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment. Exclusion criteria were previous hip surgery, patients younger than 16 or older than 60 years, Tönnis grade ≥ 2 osteoarthritis, hip dysplasia based on radiographic evidence of LCEA less than 25° and workers compensation cases. One hundred and sixty hips met the inclusion criteria, 84 were female and 70 were male patients (six bilateral cases), with a median age of 36 years (range 16-59). RESULTS: The median alpha angle correction was 22.6º (range 5.9-46.7) (p < 0.01) and the average LCEA correction when acetabuloplasty was undertaken was 6.5º (range - 1.4-20.8) (p < 0.01). The mean NAHS at baseline was 56.1 (range 16-96) and improved to 83.2 at the last follow up (range 44-100) for the patients that had no additional procedure (p < 0.01). The mean average improvement was 27.7º points (range - 16-73). No iatrogenic labral perforation and no full-thickness chondral damage were recorded during the arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable outcomes are reported for the arthroscopic treatment of FAI with initial access to the peripheral compartment. The technique is protective against iatrogenic chondral and labral damage, more conservative to the joint capsule, but the mean traction time was relatively long when suture anchors were used. The results are comparable to the classic initial central compartment approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Periacetabular Osteotomy as a Salvage Procedure: Early Outcomes in Patients Treated for Iatrogenic Hip Instability.

BACKGROUND: A periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with hip dysplasia. While its utility for patients without traditional radiographic parameters for hip dysplasia has not been previously established, the PAO may help treat patients with hip instability that does not improve following single or multiple hip arthroscopic procedures, or when such procedures lead to hip instability. METHODS: A single-surgeon registry of patients at a single institution was queried to identify patients with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of ≥24° and a Tönnis angle of <10° who underwent PAO because of hip pain and/or instability that failed treatment with hip arthroscopy. Descriptive summary statistics were reported on patient demographics, mean change in LCEA, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and the International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33), at a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Among 25 patients (mean age, 27.3 ± 6.9 years; 100% women), the mean LCEA increased from 27.2° (range, 24° to 37°) preoperatively to 39.0° ± 5.1° postoperatively (net increase, 11.8° ± 4.5°). Overall, the mean improvement in the mHHS was 11.5 ± 16.9 (preoperative, 59.4 ± 11.6; postoperative, 70.9 ± 20.6) and the mean improvement in the iHOT-33 was 23.8 ± 23.6 (preoperative, 32.2 ± 17.2; postoperative, 56.0 ± 30.0). Eighteen patients (72%) achieved a minimal clinically important improvement in mHHS (mean improvement, 17.4 ± 12.9) and iHOT-33 (mean improvement, 32.4 ± 19.1) scores. In comparison with 7 patients who did not show improvement, the 18 patients who showed improvement had significantly greater mean baseline patient-reported outcome scores. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, these findings provide the first report on outcomes of PAO in patients with hip pain following arthroscopy who do not meet the traditional criteria for acetabular dysplasia. Early benefits in clinical outcomes suggest a novel surgical indication for PAO as a potential salvage option for selected patients; however, longer-term studies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Traditional three-dimensional printing technology versus three-dimensional printing mirror model technology in the treatment of isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of traditional three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and 3D printing mirror model technology in the treatment of isolated acetabular fractures. METHODS: Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed to retrospectively compare patients with an isolated acetabular fracture who were treated with traditional 3D printing technology (Group T) or 3D printing mirror model technology (Group M) from 2011 to 2017. In total, 146 advanced-age patients (146 hips) with an isolated acetabular fracture (Group T, n = 72; Group M, n = 74) were assessed for a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range, 24-34 months). The primary endpoint was the postoperative Harris hip score (HHS). The secondary endpoints were the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, fracture reduction quality, and incidence of postoperative complications at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The HHS, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly different between the groups, with Group M showing superior clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients with an isolated acetabular fracture, 3D printing mirror model technology might lead to more accurate and efficient treatment than traditional 3D printing technology.

Bloqueo continuo del grupo de nervios pericapsular como analgesia para fractura de columna y pared posterior de acetábulo, reporte de caso y descripción de régimen de infusión para ampliar la cobertura analgésica a la región femoral distal / Continuous pericapsular nerve group blockade as analgesia for fracture of the posterior column and wall of the acetabulum; a case report and description of infusion regimen for extending analgesic effect to the distal femoral area

El uso de bloqueos de nervios para cirugías de cadera tiene beneficios demostrados. El bloqueo del grupo de nervios pericapsular es una técnica nueva que ha demostrado proveer una analgesia más satisfactoria para fracturas y artroplastias de cadera, en comparación con otros bloqueos más comúnmente usados para este tipo de cirugía. Este permite bloquear la inervación de la cápsula anterior a través del nervio obturador y las ramas articulares del femoral y obturador accesorio. Existen escasas publicaciones que describan el uso de catéteres perineurales para proveer analgesia continua utilizando esta técnica. Presentamos un caso de bloqueo continuo para analgesia preoperatoria, en un paciente que sufrió una fractura de columna y pared posterior de acetábulo, por aproximadamente 120 h. Al aumentar la velocidad de infusión se logró agregar analgesia para la región femoral distal. A diferencia de lo descrito previamente, el bloqueo se realizó utilizando un transductor de ultrasonido lineal

The use of peripheral nerve blockade for hip surgeries has proved to be beneficial. The PEricapsular Nerve Group block is a new technique described for hip fracture and hip arthroplasty that has shown to provide better analgesia compared to other peripheral blocks commonly performed for this type of surgery. This technique blocks the obturator nerve and the articular branches of the femoral nerve and the accessory obturator nerve. There are few reports describing continuous analgesia using catheters inserted in the pericapsular nerve group area. We describe a case of continuous nerve block for preoperative analgesia that lasted up to 120 hours in an adult patient with a fracture of the posterior column and wall of the acetabulum. We found that by increasing the infusion rate, analgesia reached the distal femoral area. Unlike the original technique, a high-frequency linear probe was used in this case

Reconstrucción acetabular con el sistema Cup-Cage para discontinuidades pélvicas y defectos acetabulares masivos / Reconstruction for pelvic discontinuity and massive acetabular defects

INTRODUCCIÓN: La reconstrucción acetabular con defectos óseos masivos y discontinuidades pélvicas es un procedimiento quirúrgico complejo que presenta importantes dificultades para el cirujano ortopédico. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar los resultados a corto y medio plazo de la revisión acetabular con el sistema de reconstrucción Cup-Cage en una serie consecutiva de casos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Retrospectivamente revisamos 22 casos consecutivos de defectos acetabulares masivos (8 Paprosky IIIA y 9 IIIB); 5 discontinuidades pélvicas; 2 fracturas pélvicas durante la implantación de la prótesis primaria, y una seudoartrosis pélvica. Todos fueron revisados con un cotilo de metal trabecular y una caja de reconstrucción tipo Cup-Cage. Se realizó seguimiento clínico y radiográfico de los pacientes para detectar fallos mecánicos o aflojamientos del implante. RESULTADOS: En un tiempo de seguimiento medio de 45,06 meses (12-73 meses) no se objetivó ningún fracaso radiográfico del implante (migración del componente, osteólisis ni rotura de tornillos). Las complicaciones (13,63%) incluyeron una luxación recidivante, una infección y una subluxación recidivante; todos precisaron reintervención quirúrgica. El Merle d'Aubigné-Postel mejoró de 6,91 a 14,36 y la puntuación del rango de movilidad, de 2,91 a 4,36 en promedio de los valores preoperatorios y postoperatorios, respectivamente, así como una mejoría del Harris Hip Score de 30 (16-55) a 72 (40-90) en el último control. CONCLUSIÓN: La reconstrucción acetabular con el sistema Cup-Cage es una alternativa válida para la reconstrucción de pérdidas óseas acetabulares masivas (Paprosky tipo IIIA y IIIB) y discontinuidades pélvicas que ofrece buenos resultados a corto y medio plazo

OBJECTIVE: The acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity is a complex surgery with important difficulties for the orthopaedic surgeon. The objective of this study is to show the short and midterm results of the acetabular revision with the Cup-Cage construct in a consecutive serie of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively we reviewed 22 consecutive patients with massive acetabular defects (8 Paprosky IIIa and 9 IIIB); 5 pelvic discontinuities; 2 pelvic fractures during the implantation of primary artroplasty, and one pelvic pseudoarthrosis. All were reoperated with a trabecular metal acetabular component and a Cup-Cage. We did clinical and radiological follow-up to detect machanical failures and loosening of the implant. RESULTS: With a middle follow-up of 45.06 months (12-73 months) we did not see any radiographic failure of the implant (component migration, osteolysis neither rupture of the implant or screws). The complications (13,63%) included one recurrent luxation, one infection and one recurrent subluxation. The Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from 6.91 to 14.36 and the punctuation in the range of motion from 2.91 to 4.36 on average of the values preoperatively and postoperatively respectively and improvement in Harris Hip Score 30 (16-55) to 72 (40-90) in the latest follow up. CONCLUSION: The acetabular reconstruction with the Cup-Cage system is a valid alternative for the reconstruction of massive acetabular defects (Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) and pelvic discontinuities offering good results at short and midterm follow-up

Simultaneous bilateral single-stage combined open reduction and pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Children older than 18 months with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) for the first time or who do not respond to closed treatment require open reduction with/without acetabuloplasty. We determined whether open reduction and pelvic acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega technique for both hips simultaneously was well tolerated and offered better outcomes. A total of 140 hips of 70 patients with bilateral DDH were identified. All patients were diagnosed after they started walking. Patients were treated with bilateral single-stage open reduction with acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega procedure. All patients were prospectively followed up between 2007 and 2018. Results were considered satisfactory if the acetabular index was <24°. Hemoglobin levels were evaluated in all patients. At the final follow-up, the results were evaluated radiologically and clinically based on the modified Severin's classification and modified McKay criteria, respectively. The mean age at surgery was 20.3 months (range, 16-24). The mean operative time was 228 minutes. The mean postoperative hemoglobin level was 90.5 g/L (range, 61-122; SD, ±13.4). The mean differences between the preoperative and postoperative acetabular index values for both hips were 22.36° (SD, ±6.69°) and 22.64° (SD, ±6.69°) for the right and left hips, respectively. Open reduction with pelvic acetabuloplasty using the Pemberton or Dega technique simultaneously in both hips was well tolerated, cost-effective, had excellent outcomes, and posed no additional risk to patients with DDH younger than 24 months.

Correction of the acetabular index is more crucial than the type of acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular remodeling may not be predictable after open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in older children. Several acetabuloplasties have been developed, and all are aimed at correcting the dysplastic acetabulum. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the type of pelvic acetabuloplasty and the corrected (postoperative) acetabular index (AI) affect early follow-up femoral head coverage. METHODS: A retrospective review of single-surgeon consecutive acetabuloplasties (Dega or Pemberton) from December 2012 to December 2015 was conducted. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of DDH, undergoing simultaneous primary open reduction, and follow-up of at least 18 months. Univariable analysis was based on the type of acetabuloplasty. The correlation between AI and final center edge angle (CEA) was tested. Multiple regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the total 58 hips in 39 patients included, 41 underwent Dega acetabuloplasty, and 17 had Pemberton acetabuloplasty. The median follow-up was 40.50 months (interquartile range 27.25-57). Pemberton acetabuloplasty produced a lower corrected AI, but the difference was not significant in follow-up measurements. Corrected AI was significantly correlated with final CEA (R = - 0.31, P = 0.018). In the multiple regression, only corrected AI was independently associated with final CEA (B = - 0.29, SE = 0.15, P = 0.06), whereas the type of acetabuloplasty, age, and preoperative severity of the dislocation were not. CONCLUSION: The correction obtained during acetabuloplasty affects early follow-up femoral head coverage. Ensuring proper sizing and placement of the grafted bone is probably more important than the type of acetabuloplasty chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reconstruction for pelvic discontinuity and massive acetabular defects. / Reconstrucción acetabular con el sistema Cup-Cage para discontinuidades pélvicas y defectos acetabulares masivos.

OBJECTIVE: The acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity is a complex surgery with important difficulties for the orthopaedic surgeon. The objective of this study is to show the short and midterm results of the acetabular revision with the Cup-Cage construct in a consecutive serie of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively we reviewed 22 consecutive patients with massive acetabular defects (8 Paprosky IIIa and 9 IIIB); 5 pelvic discontinuities; 2 pelvic fractures during the implantation of primary artroplasty, and one pelvic pseudoarthrosis. All were reoperated with a trabecular metal acetabular component and a Cup-Cage. We did clinical and radiological follow-up to detect machanical failures and loosening of the implant. RESULTS: With a middle follow-up of 45.06 months (12-73 months) we did not see any radiographic failure of the implant (component migration, osteolysis neither rupture of the implant or screws). The complications (13,63%) included one recurrent luxation, one infection and one recurrent subluxation. The Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from 6.91 to 14.36 and the punctuation in the range of motion from 2.91 to 4.36 on average of the values preoperatively and postoperatively respectively and improvement in Harris Hip Score 30 (16-55) to 72 (40-90) in the latest follow up. CONCLUSION: The acetabular reconstruction with the Cup-Cage system is a valid alternative for the reconstruction of massive acetabular defects (Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) and pelvic discontinuities offering good results at short and midterm follow-up.

Radiological results of Shelf acetabuloplasty in adolescent hip dysplasia with aspherical femoral head: how to get an ideal placement of the Shelf graft.

Shelf acetabuloplasty continues to be effective in the prevention or delay of osteoarthritis in adolescent dysplastic hips. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and to determine the correct level of the bone graft objectively. We retrospectively analyzed 16 hips underwent Shelf acetabuloplasty originated by Spitzy. The mean age at surgery was 15.3 years old with the mean caput index at 39.7%. The average follow-up was 11 years. The radiological evaluation was based on acetabular-head index (AHI) at preoperative and latest radiographs, acetabular-Shelf distance (ASD) and Shelf-head ratio at immediate postoperative and latest radiographs. The cutoff value for the ideal ASD was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the Pearson correlation test used in statistical analysis to assess the relationship between ASD and Shelf graft resorption. Clinical evaluation was performed using Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the latest follow-up. The AHI was improved in all cases, from mean 56.9 to 91.0% (P < 0.001). The mean of ASD was 7 mm. In nine of the 16 cases, the Shelf graft was well united at the same level of the existing acetabulum with good continuity. The ROC curve showed the cutoff value for the ideal ASD was 6 mm. The Pearson correlation test also showed a positive relationship between ASD and Shelf graft resorption (P = 0.001). The average of HHS scores was 98.1 points. Both radiological and clinical results were acceptable. The ideal placement that keeps the shelf sufficient to bear the mechanical stress without bone resorption over time was at the level of 6 mm from the joint space. Level III - therapeutic study.

Supra-ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures: reduction quality and early clinical results of a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of the operative techniques, complications, reduction quality and hip functional recovery by using the supra-ilioinguinal approach and the modified Stoppa approach for the management of acetabular fractures. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 60 patients from September 2014 to October 2017 with displaced acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate were treated operatively with supra-ilioinguinal approach (group A) and modified Stoppa approach (group B), respectively. There were 36 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B. The surgical details, complications, radiographic and clinical results were recorded. The quality of reduction was assessed by measuring the residual step and gap displacement of postoperative CT with a standardized digital method. RESULTS: The complications, reduction quality (gaps and steps) and hip function recovery had no significant statistical difference in approaches. The mean operative time was shorter and the mean intraoperative haemorrhage was less in group A. There were statistical differences in the operative time (P = 0.025) and intraoperative haemorrhage (P = 0.003) between the supra-ilioinguinal approach and the modified Stoppa approach. CONCLUSION: Compared to the modified Stoppa approach, the supra-ilioinguinal approach provides a closer visualization to the quadrilateral plate, the operative time was shorter and the intraoperative haemorrhage was clearly less. It is at least equal to or could be a better choice to deal with complicated acetabular fractures especially involving the quadrilateral plate and the anterior one third of the iliac bone.

The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Severe acetabular bone defects is a complex problem in revision hip arthroplasty, cage is one of the reconstruction options. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-long term clinical and radiographic results of Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects revised with reconstructional cage and morselized allogeneic cancellous bone graft without impaction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with reconstructional cage and allogeneic cancellous bone graft between January 2007 and January 2016. There were 13 Paprosky type IIIA bone defect patients and 15 Paprosky type IIIB bone defect patients and 4 patients of the 15 were also with pelvic discontinuity. Clinical assessment included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Radiographic assessment included center of rotation, cage migration, and bone graft incorporation. RESULTS: All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up of 79.5 months (range 38-141), HHS improved from 31.4 (13-43) points preoperatively to 84.6 (55-94) points at last follow-up and SF-12 also improved significantly. There was 1 re-revision for the cage loosening and screw breakage at 61 months after surgery, and 2 patients had nonprogressive radiolucency in zone III and the junction of zone II and zone III at the bone implant interface. CONCLUSION: The reconstructional cage combining with morselized allografts without impaction achieves a good result with a high complete allograft incorporation rate in Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Improving functional outcome and quality of life for patients with metastatic lesion of acetabulum undergoing cement augmentation.

There is an increased enthusiasm in treating osteolytic metastatic acetabulum via injecting polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) as a bone filler to provide pain relief and potential structural support. The aim of this respective study is to determine the function and quality of life improvement after cement acetabuloplasty.Thirty two patients underwent acetabular cement augmentation between May 2014 and March 2018 were respectively reviewed. Isolated percutaneous acetabuloplasty (PA) was performed in 15 patients (group A) while radiofrequency ablation with PA (RFA-PA) in 12 patients (group B). Together with PA, open reconstructive surgery on ipsilateral femur was performed in another 5 cases (group C). Pre- and posttreatment functional evaluation and quality of life (QoL) assessment were carried out.The average followup duration was 11.5 (range, 3-36) months. None of major complications occurred. 81.2% (26/32) of patients achieved complete pain relief. Reduction of pain intensity and improvement of functional status achieved significantly differences after treatment (P = .00). Significant improvement (P = .00) was observed in scales of global QoL and pain-related restrictions in daily activities. Both isolated PA and RFA-PA procedures were equally effective towards the improvement of function and quality of life (P > .05). Regarding 5 patients in group C, pain intensity decreased when loading the affected limb and they could walk with crutches or cane.Bone cement acetabuloplasty is an adequate and effective mini-invasive procedure to relieve pain, restore function, and enhance the quality of life of patients for as long as possible in metastatic patients with short life expectancy. Ipsilateral surgery appears to be safe and well tolerated.

The clinical outcome of chondrolabral-preserving arthroscopic acetabuloplasty for pincer- or mixed-type femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review.

While preservation and repair of the acetabular labrum are increasingly being recognized as important goals in hip arthroscopy, controversies still exist regarding the clinical outcome of arthroscopic acetabuloplasty with chondrolabral preservation. A systematic review was conducted and implemented by two independent reviewers, who used the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for their search. These databases were queried with the terms "arthroscopic acetabuloplasty" and "chondrolabral preservation" and "arthroscopic acetabular recession." From the 55 initial studies the reviewers finally chose and assessed five clinical studies which were eligible to their inclusion-exclusion criteria. The reviewed studies included in total 444 patients, mainly young, between 30 and 40 years old. The follow-up evaluation varied between 24 and 41 months, while all studies utilized at least a 24-month final end-point assessment. All five studies illustrated improved outcome with the use of chondrolabral preservation acetabuloplasty without labral detachment. The rate of complications was very low. The different techniques of arthroscopic acetabuloplasty combined with chondrolabral preservation illustrated encouraging results in patients suffering from pincer-type or mixed-type FAI. However, the available clinical evidence was limited and insufficient to establish any superiority of these techniques over the traditional labral detachment and sequential reattachment. In relation to the optimal treatment of FAI without isolated CAM, further research of higher quality is recommended to be conducted in order to lead to definitive conclusions.

Feasibility of a new arthroscopic shelf acetabuloplasty technique for hip instability related to moderate dysplasia.

Dysplasia-related hip instability causes pain and intra-articular derangement. The bone, the joint capsule, and the labrum are involved. We describe a surgical procedure of limited invasiveness that corrects the dysplasia by creating an acetabular shelf, repairs the secondary lesions by suturing the labrum and tightening the capsule, and corrects cam femoro-acetabular impingement if present.

Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.

Acetabular revision especially in the presence of severe bone loss is challenging. There is a paucity of literature critiquing contemporary techniques of revision acetabular reconstruction and their outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and to report clinical outcomes and survival of contemporary acetabular revision arthroplasty techniques (tantalum metal shells, uncemented revision jumbo shells, reinforced cages and rings, oblong shells and custom-made triflange constructs). Full-text papers and those with an abstract in English published from January 2001 to January 2016 were identified through international databases. A total of 50 papers of level IV scientific evidence, comprising 2811 hips in total, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Overall, patients had improved outcomes irrespective of the technique of reconstruction as documented by postoperative hip scores. Our pooled analysis suggests that oblong cups components had a lower failure rate compared with other different materials considered in this review. Custom-made triflange cups had one of highest failure rates. However, this may reflect the complexity of revisions and severity of bone loss. The most common postoperative complication reported in all groups was dislocation. This review confirms successful acetabular reconstructions using diverse techniques depending on the type of bone loss and highlights key features and outcomes of different techniques. In particular, oblong cups and tantalum shells have successful survivorship.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: why are we still operating on them? A plea for institutional newborn clinical screening.

INTRODUCTION: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common orthopaedic condition at birth. Non-surgical management with the Pavlik harness can effectively treat DDH in the newborn by providing an early clinical diagnosis, but open surgeries continue to be performed. We aimed to elucidate the reasons for this. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all open surgeries related to DDH from 2006 to 2016. Patients were either born at our institution (Group 1) or outside of it (Group 2). All Group 1 newborns were routinely screened for DDH at birth. RESULTS: 27 patients (Group 1: n = 5, Group 2: n = 22) presented at age 25 ± 19 months. Left-sided DDH (n = 21, 77.8%) and female infants (n = 22, 81.5%) were more common. The mean age at surgery was 40 ± 31 months. The most commonly performed procedure was soft tissue release open reduction with acetabuloplasty (n = 20, 74.1%). Gender, site, median age at presentation and at surgery, and prevalence of risk factors were similar for both groups. Both groups were mostly made up of late presenters (> 3 months; p = 0.34). A few patients had undergone prior treatment (p = 0.64). Newborn screening was the only significantly different variable between the groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Lack of institutionalised newborn clinical screening appears to be the root cause of late presentation of DDH leading to open surgery for its management. We recommend quality institutionalised newborn clinical screening to reduce the number of late presentations.

Combined open reduction and Dega transiliac osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in walking children.

The iliac osteotomy described by Dega in Poland, in 1969, is an acetabuloplasty that changes the acetabular configuration and its inclination. The aim of this work is to analyze a group of patients with DDH treated by combined open reduction and Dega transiliac osteotomy ,to evaluate the results and determine the advantages and disadvantages, as well as, assess the factors affecting the final outcome of such procedure. A prospective study was conducted during the period, from November 2010 to October 2014, on 39 hips, in 29 children, with neglected DDH after walking age, either diagnosed late or after failure to respond to previous non operative treatment. The mean age at the time of surgery was 27.6 months ranging from 18 to 48 months. All hips were followed up clinically and radiologically for a mean period of 33.6 months (range from 18 to 48 months). No patient was lost to follow up. At the end of follow up, satisfactory final clinical results were obtained in 34 hips (87.2%) and unsatisfactory in 5 (12.8%) according to McKay's criteria. Radiologically, satisfactory results were obtained in 32 hips (82.1%) and unsatisfactory in seven (17.9%), according to Severin's criteria. In conclusion, the results of our series show open reduction combined with Dega transiliac osteotomy to be a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of DDH in selected patients, and can easily and safely be combined with associated procedures for single stage correction of acetabular dysplasia.

Short-term follow-up of anterior and posterior both column fractures of acetabulum managed through both column plating.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of short-term follow-up of patients of both column acetabular fractures managed through anterior and posterior column plating. INTRODUCTION: Both column acetabular fractures are challenging articular injuries. Majority of them are treated operatively. The concept of "secondary congruence" was introduced by Letournel. Despite this, biomechanical data on secondary congruence indicate that nonoperative treatment leads to an increase in peak pressures in the supraacetabular region with the potential risk of developing posttraumatic degenerative osteoarthritis. Operative management is therefore justified. METHODOLOGY: A cohort of 10 patients having both column (anterior and posterior) acetabular fractures managed using bicolumnar plating between January 2016 and December 2017 were enrolled in the study and were analyzed during follow-up period. RESULTS: In total, 80% of the patients had excellent to good result. Average postoperative score was 85.7. Assessment was done using modified Harris Hip score.