The Prognostic and Therapeutic Potential of Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) Gene Expression in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Survival Outcomes and Oncogenic Pathway Modulation.

Prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) is the second most common tumor associated with death. The role and mechanisms of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene in PRAD remain unknown. We conducted an analysis of FMR1 expression in PRAD to determine its prognostic importance and connection to carcinogenic pathways such as PI3K_AKT_mTOR. Survival analyses were utilized to establish a correlation between FMR1 expression and patient outcomes. We used the integration of genomic data with bioinformatic predictions to predict the regulatory factors of the FMR1 gene in PRAD. Our data revealed that individuals with higher levels of FMR1 expression experience worse survival outcomes compared to those with lower expression (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 - 24, p = 0.0412). FMR1 expression was significantly higher in patients with advanced pathological tumor stages, particularly in the pT3 and pT4 combined stages and the pN1 nodal stage. Furthermore, patients with high Gleason scores (GSs) (combined GSs 8 and 9) exhibited increased levels of FMR1 expression. Our results further identify a possible regulatory link between FMR1 and key oncogenic pathways, including PI3K_AKT_mTOR, and predict the possible mechanism by which FMR1 is regulated in PRAD. Our data suggest that the FMR1 gene could serve as a biomarker for PRAD progression. However, in-depth investigations, including those with large patient samples and in vitro studies, are needed to validate this finding and understand the mechanisms involved.

Diffuse-Type Histology Is Prognostic for All Siewert Types of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA) remains controversial. We evaluated the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with locally advanced GEJA according to the histological type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with locally advanced GEJA who underwent curative-intent surgical resection between 2010 and 2020. Perioperative therapies as well as clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. The results of endoscopy and histopathological examinations were assessed for Siewert and Lauren classifications. RESULTS: Among the 58 patients included in this study, 44 (76%) were clinical stage III, and all received neoadjuvant therapy (72% chemoradiation, 41% chemotherapy, 14% both chemoradiation and chemotherapy). Tumor locations were evenly distributed by Siewert Classification (33% Siewert-I, 40% Siewert-II, and 28% Siewert-III). Esophagogastrectomy (EG) was performed for 47 (81%) patients and total gastrectomy (TG) for 11 (19%) patients. All TG patients received D2 lymphadenectomy compared to 10 (21%) EG patients. Histopathological examination showed the presence of 64% intestinal-type and 36% diffuse-type histology. The frequencies of diffuse-type histology were similar among Siewert groups (37% Siewert-I, 36% Siewert-II, and 33% Siewert-III). Regardless of Siewert type and compared to intestinal-type, diffuse histology was associated with increased intraabdominal recurrence rates (P=0.03) and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.33; P=0.02). With a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 29 (50%) patients had a recurrence, and the median overall survival was 50.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Present in equal proportions among Siewert types of esophageal and gastric cancer, a diffuse-type histology was associated with high intraabdominal recurrence rates and poor survival. Histopathological evaluation should be considered in addition to anatomic location in the determination of multimodal GEJA treatment strategies.

Construction and validation of a TTN mutation associated immune prognostic model for evaluating immune microenvironment and outcomes of gastric cancer: An observational study.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent form of cancer worldwide, and TTN (titin) mutations are frequently observed in GC. However, the association between TTN mutations and immunotherapy for GC remains unclear, necessitating the development of novel prognostic models. The prognostic value and potential mechanisms of TTN in stomach adenocarcinoma were evaluated by TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas)-stomach adenocarcinoma cohort analysis, and an immune prognostic model was constructed based on TTN status. We validated it using the GSE84433 dataset. We performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and screened for differentially expressed genes, and used lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression analysis to screen for survival genes to construct a multifactorial survival model. In addition, we evaluated the relative proportions of 22 immune cells using the CIBERSORT algorithm for immunogenicity analysis. Finally, we constructed the nomogram integrating immune prognostic model and other clinical factors. GESA showed enrichment of immune-related phenotypes in patients with TTN mutations. We constructed an immune prognostic model based on 16 genes could identify gastric cancer patients with higher risk of poor prognosis. Immuno-microenvironmental analysis showed increased infiltration of naive B cells, plasma cells, and monocyte in high-risk patients. In addition, Nomo plots predicted the probability of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS (overall survival) in GC patients, showing good predictive performance. In this study, we identified that TTN gene may be a potential clinical biomarker for GC and TTN mutations may be a predictor of immunotherapy in patients. We constructed and validated a new model for prognosis of GC patients based on immune characteristics associated with TTN mutations. This study may provide potential therapeutic strategies for gastric cancer.

Identifying and evaluating a disulfidptosis-related gene signature to predict prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients.

Disulfidptosis, a regulated form of cell death, has been recently reported in cancers characterized by high SLC7A11 expression, including invasive breast carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, its role in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) has been infrequently discussed. In this study, we developed and validated a prognostic model based on 20 disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) using LASSO and Cox regression analyses. The robustness and practicality of this model were assessed via a nomogram. Subsequent correlation and enrichment analysis revealed a relationship between the risk score, several critical cancer-related biological processes, immune cell infiltration, and the expression of oncogenes and cell senescence-related genes. POU4F1, a significant component of our model, might function as an oncogene due to its upregulation in COAD tumors and its positive correlation with oncogene expression. In vitro assays demonstrated that POU4F1 knockdown noticeably decreased cell proliferation and migration but increased cell senescence in COAD cells. We further investigated the regulatory role of the DRG in disulfidptosis by culturing cells in a glucose-deprived medium. In summary, our research revealed and confirmed a DRG-based risk prediction model for COAD patients and verified the role of POU4F1 in promoting cell proliferation, migration, and disulfidptosis.

Mesonephric-type adenocarcinomas of the ovary: prevalence, diagnostic reproducibility, outcome, and value of PAX2.

Mesonephric-type (or -like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four-marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four-marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (κ = 0.376-0.727) with the integration of the four-marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first-line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.85; p < 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.

Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?

BACKGROUND: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV). METHODS: A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (< Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay ≤ 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR). RESULTS: A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08-15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR.

Prognostic value of tumor regression grade (TRG) after oncological gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy combined with surgical resection represent the gold standard in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. The Mandard tumor regression score (TRG) is widely used to evaluate pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of TRG in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent oncological gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 to December 2019 for gastric adenocarcinoma was performed. Based on their TRG status they were categorized into two groups: good responders (TRG 1-2) and poor responders (TRG 3-5). Subsequent multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included, whereby 15 (20.3%) were TRG 1-2. Neoadjuvant regimens for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were similar: MAGIC (53% vs. 39%), FLOT (40% vs. 36%), FOLFOX (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.462). Histologic types according to Lauren classification for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were: 13% vs. 29% intestinal, 53% vs. 44% diffuse and 34% vs. 27% indeterminate (p = 0.326). TRG 1-2 group exhibited significantly less advanced ypT (46% vs. 10%, p = 0.001) and ypN stages (66% vs. 37%, p = 0.008), alongside a diminished recurrence rate (20% vs. 42%, p = 0.111). The 3-year DFS was significantly better in this group (81% vs. 47%, p = 0.041) whereas the disparity in three-year OS (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.054) did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: TRG 1-2 was associated with less advanced ypT and ypN stage and better DFS compared to TRG 3-5 patients, without a significant impact on OS.

Evaluating the prognostic value of tumor deposits in non-metastatic lymph node-positive colon adenocarcinoma using Cox regression and machine learning.

BACKGROUND: The 8th AJCC TNM staging for non-metastatic lymph node-positive colon adenocarcinoma patients(NMLP-CA) stages solely by lymph node status, irrespective of the positivity of tumor deposits (TD). This study uses machine learning and Cox regression to predict the prognostic value of tumor deposits in NMLP-CA. METHODS: Patient data from the SEER registry (2010-2019) was used to develop CSS nomograms based on prognostic factors identified via multivariate Cox regression. Model performance was evaluated by c-index, dynamic calibration, and Schmid score. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to explain the selected models. RESULTS: The study included 16,548 NMLP-CA patients, randomized 7:3 into training (n = 11,584) and test (n = 4964) sets. Multivariate Cox analysis identified TD, age, marital status, primary site, grade, pT stage, and pN stage as prognostic for cancer-specific survival (CSS). In the test set, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model achieved the best C-index (0.733) for CSS prediction, while the Cox model and GAMBoost model optimized dynamic calibration(6.473) and Schmid score (0.285), respectively. TD ranked among the top 3 most important features in the models, with increasing predictive significance over time. CONCLUSIONS: Positive tumor deposit status confers worse prognosis in NMLP-CA patients. Tumor deposits may confer higher TNM staging. Furthermore, TD could play a more significant role in the staging system.

Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Despite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the surgical approach on the quality of TME and surgical margins and to characterize the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open TME for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with primary, nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent either lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection via robotic (Rob), laparoscopic (Lap), or open approaches were selected from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017). Quasi-Poisson regression analysis with backward selection was used to investigate the relationship between the surgical approach and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Among the 664 patients included in the study, the distribution of surgical approaches was as follows: 351 (52.9%) underwent TME via the open approach, 159 (23.9%) via the robotic approach, and 154 (23.2%) via the laparoscopic approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics among the three cohorts. The laparoscopic cohort had fewer patients with low rectal cancer (<6 cm from the anal verge) than the robotic and open cohorts (Lap 28.6% versus Rob 59.1% versus Open 45.6%, P = 0.015). Patients who underwent Rob and Lap TME had lower intraoperative blood loss compared with the Open approach (Rob 200 mL [Q1, Q3: 100.0, 300.0] versus Lap 150 mL [Q1, Q3: 75.0, 250.0] versus Open 300 mL [Q1, Q3: 150.0, 600.0], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the operative time (Rob 243 min [Q1, Q3: 203.8, 300.2] versus Lap 241 min [Q1, Q3: 186, 336] versus Open 226 min [Q1, Q3: 178, 315.8], P = 0.309) between the three approaches. Postoperative length of stay was shorter with robotic and laparoscopic approach compared to open approach (Rob 5.0 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8.2] versus Lap 5 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8] versus Open 7.0 d [Q1, Q3: 5, 9], P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches (79.2%, 64.9%, and 64.7%, respectively; P = 0.46). The margin positivity rate, a composite of circumferential margin and distal margin, was higher with the robotic and open approaches than with the laparoscopic approach (Rob 8.2% versus Open 6.6% versus Lap 1.9%, P = 0.17), Rob versus Lap (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.83) and Rob versus Open (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.22, 1.12). There was no difference in long-term survival, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, between patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open TME (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer, we did not observe a difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, or open approaches. Robotic and open TME compared to laparoscopic TME were associated with higher margin positivity rates in our study. This was likely due to the higher percentage of low rectal cancers in the robotic and open cohorts. We also reported no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the aforementioned surgical techniques.

Clinicopathological features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of gastric cancer (GC), accounting for less than 1% of all cases. It is characterized by frequent liver metastasis recurrence and a poorer prognosis than conventional GC. However, established treatment guidelines for HAS are currently not available.In this report, we present the results of a clinicopathological study of 19 patients diagnosed with HAS, including seven patients with liver metastasis, conducted by the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO) between 2016 and 2018. AIMS: The aim of the study was to retrospectively observe the outcomes of HAS with gastrectomy and hepatectomy for liver metastasis and determine relevant prognostic factor. We also examined the criteria and outcomes of hepatectomy for liver metastasis and aimed to suggest the optimal treatment for HAS, including chemotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2147 patients underwent gastrectomy for GC at HiSCO-affiliated institutions during the study period; 19 patients, all male with a mean age of 70.9 years, were diagnosed with HAS by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining. Patients underwent gastrectomy at varying pathological stages: six at Stage I, three at Stage II, seven at Stage III, and three at Stage IV. Ten patients received postoperative chemotherapy and the 5-year survival rate was 67.7% after gastrectomy. Among the seven patients with pre or postoperative liver metastasis, five patients underwent hepatectomy. Although one patient had recurrence, the 3-year survival rate was 100% after hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous reports suggesting a 3-year survival rate of approximmately 30% for HAS, our findings indicate that the prognosis for HAS may not be as poor as reported previously. This study contributes valuable insights into the management and potential treatment strategies for HAS.

Clinical outcomes and biomarker exploration of first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1-expressing of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of first-line programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had undergone first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy between October 2017 and May 2022. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). SPSS software V27.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of 345 enrolled patients, 290 had measurable lesions. The overall ORR was 59.3%. PD-L1 status was available in 171 patients, and 67.8% of them were considered as low PD-L1 expression level (combined positive score (CPS) < 5). Patients with PD-L1 CPS < 5 showed a lower response rate (51.1% vs 70.8%, P = 0.024) and a worse PFS (P = 0.009) compared to those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. In the PD-L1 low-expression cohort, patients with non-diffuse type, GEJ cancer, synchronous metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, non-peritoneal metastasis, and HER2 positive were significantly associated with higher response rates to PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.028) and diffuse type (P = 0.046) were identified as independent predictors of poor PFS in multivariate analysis of the PD-L1 CPS < 5 subgroup. When evaluated for correlation with overall survival (OS) in the PD-L1 low-expression subgroup, peritoneal metastasis was found to be the only independent prognostic factor of an increased risk of death (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% CI 1.09-4.90; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 is significantly associated with improved response and extended PFS in G/GEJ cancer patients treated with a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. Specific subgroups within the low PD-L1-expressing population, such as those with non-diffuse-type tumors and without peritoneal metastases, may also benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

Tumor inflammatory microenvironment contribution to survival in resected upstaged adenocarcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor Inflammatory microenvironment (TIME) encompasses several immune pathways modulating cancer development and escape that are not entirely uncoded. The results achieved with immunotherapy elicited the scientific debate on TIME also in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate whether TIME (in terms of PD-L1 expression and/or Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes - TILs) played a separate role in terms of survival (OS) in resected upstaged lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs), excluding other perioperative variables as confounders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients with a clinically resectable lung ADC, undergoing surgery (lobectomy or segmentectomy) at the Thoracic Unit of Padova University Hospital between 2016 and 2022 and receiving an unexpected pathological upstaging (IIB or higher). RESULTS: Despite microscopical variables increasing from IIB to IIIB, survival was not significantly related to them. OS was better in TIME-active patients (defined as the presence of positive PD-L1 and/or TILs>10 %) than double negatives (PD-L1-/TILs-) (p = 0.01). In IIB or higher ADCs, TIME-active patients showed an improved survival compared to double negatives, merging the current TIME theories. CONCLUSION: TIME seems to be associated with survival independently from other microscopical parameter, even in case of resected upstaged adenocarcinomas.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in small-bowel adenocarcinoma patients using the SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy forwhich survival is hampered by late diagnosis, complex responses to treatment, and poor prognosis. Accurate prognostic tools are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with SBA and compare it to traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2,064 patients diagnosed with SBA between 2010 and 2020 from the SEER database. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis, Cox multivariate regression, and nomograms were constructed for analysis of 3-year and 5-year CSS. The performance of the nomograms was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression identified sex, age at diagnosis, marital status, tumor site, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, retrieval of regional lymph nodes (RORLN), and chemotherapy as independent covariates associated with CSS. In both the training and validation cohorts, the developed nomograms demonstrated superior performance to that of the AJCC staging system, with C-indices of 0.764 and 0.759, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values obtained by ROC analysis for 3-year and 5-year CSS prediction significantly surpassed those of the AJCC model. The nomograms were validated using calibration and decision curves, confirming their clinical utility and superior predictive accuracy. The NRI and IDI indicated the enhanced predictive capability of the nomogram model. CONCLUSION: The SEER-based nomogram offers a significantly superior ability to predict CSS in SBA patients, supporting its potential application in clinical decision-making and personalized approaches to managing SBA to improve survival outcomes.

THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX IN GASTRIC CANCER AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION.

BACKGROUND: Predicting short- and long-term outcomes of oncological therapies is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. Malnutrition and the host immune status significantly affect outcomes in major surgeries. AIMS: To assess the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting outcomes in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2020. PNI was calculated as follows: PNI=(10 x albumin [g/dL])+(0.005 x lymphocytes [nº/mm3]). The optimal cutoff value was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (PNI cutoff=52), and patients were grouped into low and high PNI. RESULTS: Of the 529 patients included, 315 (59.5%) were classified as a low-PNI group (PNI<52) and 214 (40.5%) as a high-PNI group (PNI≥52). Older age (p=0.050), male sex (p=0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) III/IV (p=0.001), lower hemoglobin level (p<0.001), lower body mass index (p=0.001), higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p<0.001), D1 lymphadenectomy, advanced pT stage, pN+ and more advanced pTNM stage were related to low-PNI patient. Furthermore, 30-day (1.4 vs. 4.8%; p=0.036) and 90-day (3.3 vs. 10.5%; p=0.002) mortality rates were higher in low-PNI compared to high-PNI group. Disease-free and overall survival were worse in low-PNI patients compared to high-PNI (p<0.001 for both). ASA III/IV score, low-PNI, pT3/T4, and pN+ were independent risk factors for worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PNI can predict short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Low PNI is an independent factor related to worse disease-free and overall survival.

PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE DENSITY OF TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL-MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF COLON ADENOCARCINOMAS.

AIM: To study the prognostic value of the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and its association with other clinical-morphological parameters in colon adenocarcinomas (CAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 236 CAC samples were examined. TILs density was estimated as the percentage of tumor stromal area occupied by TILs. By the index of TILs density, the patients were divided into 3 groups: TILs 0-9% (n = 88); TILs 10-39% (n = 106); TILs > 40% (n = 42). Dependent on this index, their overall survival (OS) was analyzed. RESULTS: Kaplan - Meier curves revealed a significant (p < 0.001) difference in the OS for patients with different TILs infiltration intensities. Multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression model analysis has confirmed that patients with moderate TILs density (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.96, p = 0.035) had better OS rates compared to low TILs density. TILs were associated with the stage (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis pN (p < 0.001), distant metastasis M (p < 0.001), and the patient's outcome (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TILs can be considered an additional prognostic tool during regular histological examination and are strongly associated with the most significant clinical-morphological features of CAC.

To explore the prognostic characteristics of colon cancer based on tertiary lymphoid structure-related genes and reveal the characteristics of tumor microenvironment and drug prediction.

In order to construct a prognostic evaluation model of TLS features in COAD and better realize personalized precision medicine in COAD. Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system. At present, there is no effective prognostic marker to predict the prognosis of patients. Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) affects cancer progression by regulating immune microenvironment. Mining COAD biomarkers based on TLS-related genes helps to improve the prognosis of patients. In order to construct a prognostic evaluation model of TLS features in COAD and better realize personalized precision medicine in COAD. The mRNA expression data and clinical information of COAD and adjacent tissues were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed TLS-related genes of COAD relative to adjacent tissues were obtained by differential analysis. TLS gene co-expression analysis was used to mine genes highly related to TLS, and the intersection of the two was used to obtain candidate genes. Univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed on candidate genes to screen prognostic markers to construct a risk assessment model. The differences of immune characteristics were evaluated by ESTIMATE, ssGSEA and CIBERSORT in high and low risk groups of prognostic model. The difference of genomic mutation between groups was evaluated by tumor mutation burden score. Screening small molecule drugs through the GDSC library. Finally, a nomogram was drawn to evaluate the clinical value of the prognostic model. Seven TLS-related genes ADAM8, SLC6A1, PAXX, RIMKLB, PTH1R, CD1B, and MMP10 were screened to construct a prognostic model. Survival analysis showed that patients in the high-risk group had significantly lower overall survival rates. Immune microenvironment analysis showed that patients in the high-risk group had higher immune indicators, indicating higher immunity. The genomic mutation patterns of the high-risk and low-risk groups were significantly different, especially the KRAS mutation frequency was significantly higher in the high-risk group. Drug sensitivity analysis showed that the low-risk group was more sensitive to Erlotinib, Savolitinib and VE _ 822, which may be used as a potential drug for COAD treatment. Finally, the nomogram constructed by pathological features combined with RiskScore can accurately evaluate the prognosis of COAD patients. This study constructed and verified a TLS model that can predict COAD. More importantly, it provides a reference standard for guiding the prognosis and immunotherapy of COAD patients.

Competitive Risk Analysis of Prognosis in Older Adults with Sigmoid Colon Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to employ a competing risk model based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify prognostic factors for elderly individuals with sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma (SCA) and compare them with the classic Cox proportional hazards model. METHODS: We extracted data from elderly patients diagnosed with SCA registered in the SEER database between 2010 and 2015. Univariate analysis was conducted using cumulative incidence functions and Gray's test, while multivariate analysis was performed using both the Fine-Gray and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among the 10,712 eligible elderly patients diagnosed with SCA, 5595 individuals passed away: 2987 due to sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma and 2608 from other causes. The results of one-way Gray's test showed that age, race, marital status, AJCC stage, differentiation grade, tumor size, surgical status, liver metastasis status, lung metastasis status, brain metastasis status, radiotherapy status, and chemotherapy status all affected the prognosis of SCA (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that sex, age, race, marital status, and surgical status affected the prognosis of SCA (P < .05). Multifactorial Fine-Gray analysis revealed that key factors influencing the prognosis of SCA patients include age, race, marital status, AJCC stage, grade classification, surgical status, tumor size, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and chemotherapy status (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Data from the SEER database were used to more accurately estimate CIFs for sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma-specific mortality and prognostic factors using competing risk models.

Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Background and Objectives: Lung adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite recent therapeutic advances. Cancer stem cells have gained increasing attention due to their ability to induce cancer cell proliferation through self-renewal and differentiation into multiple cell lineages. OCT4 and LIN28 (and their homologs A and B) have been identified as key regulators of pluripotency in mammalian embryonic (ES) and induced stem (IS) cells, and they are the crucial regulators of cancer progression. However, their exact role in lung adenocarcinoma has not yet been clarified. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to explore the role of the pluripotency factors OCT4 and LIN28 in a cohort of surgically resected human lung adenocarcinomas to reveal possible biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis and potential therapeutic targets. The expressions of OCT4, LIN28A and LIN28B were analyzed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 96 patients with lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry. The results were analyzed with clinicopathologic parameters and were related to the prognosis of patients. Results: Higher OCT4 expression was related to an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (p < 0.001). Nuclear LIN28B expression was lower in stage I and II tumors (p < 0.05) compared to advanced stage tumors. LIN28B cytoplasmic expression was associated with 5-year OS rates not only in univariate (p < 0.005), but also in multivariate analysis (where age, gender, histopathological subtype and stage were used as cofactors, p < 0.01 HR = 2.592). Patients with lower LIN28B expression showed improved 5-year OS rates compared to patients with increased LIN28B expression. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that OCT4 and LIN28B are implicated in lung adenocarcinoma progression and prognosis outcome; thus, they serve as promising prognostic biomarkers and putative therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinomas.

Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for inguinal lymph node metastasis in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: The significance of lymphadenectomy and its indications in patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) of anorectal adenocarcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of inguinal lymphadenectomy for ILNM. METHOD: This study included patients who underwent surgical resection for ILNM of rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with pathologically positive metastases between 1997 and 2011 at 20 participating centres in the Study Group for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer organized by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were included. The primary tumour was in the rectum in 57 patients (53.3%) and in the anal canal in 50 (46.7%). The median number of ILNMs was 2.34. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in five patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 38.8%. Multivariate analysis identified undifferentiated histological type (P < 0.001), pathological venous invasion (P = 0.01) and pathological primary tumour depth T0-2 (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: The 5-year overall survival after inguinal lymph node dissection was acceptable, and it warrants consideration in more patients. Further larger-scale studies are needed in order to clarify the surgical indications.

Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer in Japan: A real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab was approved for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in 2017 in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nivolumab in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This single-institutional retrospective study included patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and a history of first-line chemotherapy with platinum-based doublet or triplet regimens between 2010 and 2020. To assess the impact of nivolumab on survival, the patients were divided based on the year of nivolumab approval into a pre-2017 (2010-2016) group and a post-2017 (2017-2020) group. RESULTS: From a total of 1918 patients, 1093 were excluded. There were 533 patients in the pre-2017 group and 292 in the post-2017 group. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used significantly more often in the post-2017 group than in the pre-2017 group (8.6% vs. 47.9%). Median overall survival was significantly longer in the post-2017 group (16.9 vs. 13.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.90; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients transitioning to third-line treatment was higher in the post-2017 group than in the pre-2017 group (56.3% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.01). Median survival outcomes following progression on second-line treatment were significantly longer in the post-2017 group (4.3 vs. 3.2 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients transitioning to third-line treatment and survival outcomes following progression on second-line treatment have improved since the approval of nivolumab. This drug might help to prolong overall survival in real-world practice.