Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 184: 89-95, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301311

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The longer-term impact of introducing human papillomavirus (HPV) testing into routine cervical cancer screening on precancer and cancer rates by histologic type has not been well described. Calendar trends in diagnoses were examined using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California, which introduced triennial HPV and cytology co-testing in 2003 for women aged ≥30 years. METHODS: We examined trends in cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 [CIN3] and adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS]) and cancer (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] and adenocarcinoma [ADC]) diagnoses per 1000 screened during 2003-2018. We examined ratios of squamous vs. glandular diagnoses (SCC:ADC and CIN3:AIS). RESULTS: CIN3 and AIS diagnoses increased approximately 2% and 3% annually, respectively (ptrend < 0.001 for both). While SCC diagnoses decreased by 5% per annually (ptrend < 0.001), ADC diagnoses did not change. These patterns were generally observed within each age group (30-39, 40-49, and 50-64 years). ADC diagnoses per 1000 screened did not change even among those who underwent co-testing starting in 2003-2006. SCC:ADC decreased from approximately 2.5:1 in 2003-2006 to 1.3:1 in 2015-2018 while the CIN3:AIS remained relatively constant, ∼10:1. CONCLUSIONS: Since its introduction at KPNC, co-testing increased the detection of CIN3 over time, which likely caused a subsequent reduction of SCC. However, there has been no observed decrease in ADC. One possible explanation for lack of effectiveness against ADC is the underdiagnosis of AIS. Novel strategies to identify and treat women at high risk of ADC need to be developed and clinically validated.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , California/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/trends , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Aged , Vaginal Smears/trends , Vaginal Smears/methods , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Cytology
2.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 34(1): e8, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36424703

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety between cervical conization (CC) alone and hysterectomy for patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AIS after CC during 2007-2021 were identified by computerized databases at Women's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. A total of 453 AIS patients were divided into 2 groups according to uterus preservation: hysterectomy group (n=300) and CC(s) alone group (n=153). The prevalence of residual disease and disease recurrence was compared between patients treated by CC(s) alone and hysterectomy. The prevalence of residual disease in specimens from women who had a hysterectomy and repeat CC were compared between positive and negative margins of CC. The factors influencing residual disease and disease recurrence were assessed. RESULTS: Among 310 specimens from women who had a hysterectomy or repeat CC, the prevalence of residual disease was 50.6% (45/89) for a positive margin and 2.3% (5/221) for a negative margin (p=0.000). Four patients had recurrence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in those treated by hysterectomy and one had recurrence of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in those treated by CC(s) alone. The prevalence of recurrence was 0.7% (1/153) for CC(s) alone and 1.3% (4/300) for hysterectomy (p=0.431). Hysterectomy did not influence residual disease or disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: CC is an efficacious and safe option for patients with AIS of the cervix provided the margin is negative.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/surgery , Conization/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Neoplasm, Residual/epidemiology , Neoplasm, Residual/surgery , Retrospective Studies
3.
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi ; 51(4): 338-343, 2022 Apr 08.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35359046

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine the prevalence and frequencies of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Methods: The cases of cervical AIS with concurrent tests of cytology and HPV typing from January 2007 to February 2020 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 478 cases of cervical AIS were obtained. The average age of the patients was 39.4 years (range, 19-81 years). The largest age group was 30-39 years (44.8%), followed by 40-49 years (34.7%). Among the 478 patients, 355 underwent high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing and had a hrHPV-positive rate of 93.8%. Of the 355 patients, 277 also underwent HPV typing and were mostly positive for either or both HPV16 and HPV18 (93.1%), with 55.6% positive for HPV18 and 48.7% positive for HPV16. Among the 478 cases, 266 cases (55.6%) were diagnosed with both AIS and squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), while 212 cases (44.4%) were diagnosed with only AIS. Patients infected with HPV16 in the AIS and SIL group significantly outnumbered those in the AIS alone group (P<0.05). Moreover, the rate of positive cytology was 55.9% (167/299 cases), while that of negative cytology was 44.1% (132/299). Among the 109 patients with negative cytology results and co-tested hrHPV, there were 101 HPV-positive cases (92.7%), of which 88 cases were subject to HPV typing and showed an HPV16/18 positive rate of 94.3% (83/88 cases). Conclusions: The combination of HPV typing and cytological screening can maximize the detection rate of cervical AIS, and should continue to be utilized, ideally on a larger scale, in the future.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Prevalence , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Young Adult
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 62(3): 395-403, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756753

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Demonstrating human papillomavirus vaccine impact is critical for informing guidelines to increase vaccination and decrease human papillomavirus‒related outcomes, particularly in states with suboptimal vaccination coverage, such as Tennessee. This study examines the trends in high-grade cervical lesion incidence among Tennessee Medicaid-enrolled women aged 18-39 years and the subset of women who were screened for cervical cancer. METHODS: Using a validated claims-based model to identify incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grades 2 or 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ events, annual age group‒specific incidence rates from Tennessee Medicaid billing data, 2008-2018, were calculated. Significant trends were determined by Joinpoint. Analyses were conducted in 2020. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2018, high-grade cervical lesion incidence significantly declined in women aged 18-20 years (average annual percentage change= -31.9, 95% CI= -38.6, -24.6), 21-24 years (average annual percentage change= -12.9, 95% CI= -22.3, -2.4), and 25-29 years (average annual percentage change= -6.4, 95% CI= -8.1, -4.6). Among screened women, rates significantly declined for ages 18-20 years (average annual percentage change= -20.3, 95% CI= -25.3, -15.0), 21-24 years (average annual percentage change= -10.2, 95% CI= -12.6, -7.8), and 25-29 years (average annual percentage change= -2.6, 95% CI= -3.9, -1.2). Trends from 2008 to 2018 were stable for older age groups (30-34 and 35-39 years). CONCLUSIONS: Results show reductions in high-grade cervical lesion incidence among ages most likely to have benefited from the human papillomavirus vaccine. Declines among young, screened women suggest causes other than reduction in screening. Evidence of vaccine impact in populations with low-vaccination coverage, such as Tennessee, is promising.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control
5.
Chinese Journal of Pathology ; (12): 338-343, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-935536

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine the prevalence and frequencies of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Methods: The cases of cervical AIS with concurrent tests of cytology and HPV typing from January 2007 to February 2020 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 478 cases of cervical AIS were obtained. The average age of the patients was 39.4 years (range, 19-81 years). The largest age group was 30-39 years (44.8%), followed by 40-49 years (34.7%). Among the 478 patients, 355 underwent high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing and had a hrHPV-positive rate of 93.8%. Of the 355 patients, 277 also underwent HPV typing and were mostly positive for either or both HPV16 and HPV18 (93.1%), with 55.6% positive for HPV18 and 48.7% positive for HPV16. Among the 478 cases, 266 cases (55.6%) were diagnosed with both AIS and squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), while 212 cases (44.4%) were diagnosed with only AIS. Patients infected with HPV16 in the AIS and SIL group significantly outnumbered those in the AIS alone group (P<0.05). Moreover, the rate of positive cytology was 55.9% (167/299 cases), while that of negative cytology was 44.1% (132/299). Among the 109 patients with negative cytology results and co-tested hrHPV, there were 101 HPV-positive cases (92.7%), of which 88 cases were subject to HPV typing and showed an HPV16/18 positive rate of 94.3% (83/88 cases). Conclusions: The combination of HPV typing and cytological screening can maximize the detection rate of cervical AIS, and should continue to be utilized, ideally on a larger scale, in the future.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Prevalence , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
6.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 56(9): 622-629, 2021 Sep 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547863

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the hierarchical management scheme of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) based on cervical conization margin state. Methods: All medical records of 249 patients diagnosed as AIS by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2015 in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were retrospectively reviewed, to explore the relationship between the status of the resection margin and the residual lesion after LEEP, and the multivariate logistic regression method was used to analyze the related factors that affect the residual lesion after LEEP in cervical AIS patients. Results: (1) The age of 249 cervical AIS patients was (40±8) years old (range: 23-71 years old). Of the 249 patients, 19 (7.6%, 19/249) had residual lesions; 69 cases were pathologically diagnosed as AIS after LEEP, and the residual lesion rate was 13.0% (9/69), which was significantly higher than that of AIS + high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [5.6% (10/180); χ2=3.968,P=0.046]; 33 cases were multifocal lesions, the residual rate of lesions was 21.2% (7/33), which was significantly higher than that of single focal lesions patients [5.6% (12/216); χ2=7.858, P=0.005]; 181 patients underwent endocervical curettage (ECC) before surgery, the residual rate of lesions in ECC-positive patients was 14.0% (14/100) , significantly higher than that of ECC-negative patients [4.9% (4/81); χ2=4.103, P=0.043]. (2) Among 249 cases of AIS patients, the positive rate of resection margins after LEEP was 35.3% (88/249); the residual rate of lesions in patients with positive resection margins (14.8%, 13/88) was significantly higher than those with negative margins [3.8%(6/156); χ2=9.355, P=0.002]. The age of patients underwent total hysterectomy after LEEP was (43±7) years old, which was significantly higher than that of patients who did not undergo total hysterectomy [(37±8) years old; t=6.518, P<0.01].Among the patients underwent total hysterectomy after LEEP, 3 cases (2.0%, 3/152) had fertility requirements, while 38 cases (39.2%, 38/97) did not underwent total hysterectomy, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=59.579, P<0.01). Among the 152 patients who underwent total hysterectomy after LEEP, the residual rate of lesions was 11.8% (18/152); the residual rate of lesions in patients with positive resection margins was significantly higher than that of patients with negative resection margins [18.8% (12/64) vs 7.0% (6/86); χ2=4.861, P=0.028]. The median follow-up time of 97 patients who did not undergo total hysterectomy after LEEP was 32 months (range: 4-70 months). During the follow-up period, 3 cases of cervical AIS recurrence (3.1%, 3/97) and were followed by hysterectomy,no invasive adenocarcinoma were seen. (3) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the positive resection margin (OR=4.098, 95%CI: 1.235-13.595, P=0.021), multifocal lesions (OR=5.464, 95%CI: 1.494-19.981, P=0.010) were independent risk factors that affected the residual lesions in patients with cervical AIS after LEEP. Conclusions: The cervical AIS patients after LEEP conization suggested be stratified by cone margin state as the first-line stratified index, age and fertility needs as the second-line stratified management index. The individualized management plan should be developed based on comprehensive assessment of high-risk factors of residual lesions.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/surgery , Adult , Aged , Conization , Electrosurgery , Female , Humans , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm, Residual/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult
7.
PLoS Med ; 18(6): e1003665, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34086680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excisional procedures of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) may increase the risk of preterm birth. It is unknown whether this increased risk is due to the excision procedure itself, to the underlying CIN, or to secondary risk factors that are associated with both preterm birth and CIN. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in women with treated and untreated CIN and examine possible associations by making a distinction between the excised volume of cervical tissue and having cervical disease. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This Dutch population-based observational cohort study identified women aged 29 to 41 years with CIN between 2005 and 2015 from the Dutch pathology registry (PALGA) and frequency matched them with a control group without any cervical abnormality based on age at and year of pathology outcome (i.e., CIN or normal cytology) and urbanization (<100,000 inhabitants or ≥100,000 inhabitants). All their 45,259 subsequent singleton pregnancies with a gestational age ≥16 weeks between 2010 and 2017 were identified from the Dutch perinatal database (Perined). Nineteen potential confounders for preterm birth were identified. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for preterm birth comparing the 3 different groups of women: (1) women without CIN diagnosis; (2) women with untreated CIN; and (3) women with treated CIN prior to each childbirth. In total, 29,907, 5,940, and 9,412 pregnancies were included in the control, untreated CIN, and treated CIN group, respectively. The control group showed a 4.8% (1,002/20,969) proportion of spontaneous preterm birth, which increased to 6.9% (271/3,940) in the untreated CIN group, 9.5% (600/6,315) in the treated CIN group, and 15.6% (50/321) in the group with multiple treatments. Women with untreated CIN had a 1.38 times greater odds of preterm birth compared to women without CIN (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.60; P < 0.001). For women with treated CIN, these odds 2.07 times increased compared to the control group (95% CI 1.85 to 2.33; P < 0.001). Treated women had a 1.51 times increased odds of preterm birth compared to women with untreated CIN (95% CI 1.29 to 1.76; P < 0.001). Independent from cervical disease, a volume excised from the cervix of 0.5 to 0.9 cc increased the odds of preterm birth 2.20 times (37/379 versus 1,002/20,969; 95% CI 1.52 to 3.20; P < 0.001). These odds further increased 3.13 times and 5.93 times for women with an excised volume of 4 to 8.9 cc (90/724 versus 1,002/20,969; 95% CI 2.44 to 4.01; P < 0.001) and ≥9 cc (30/139 versus 1,002/20,969; 95% CI 3.86 to 9.13; P < 0.001), respectively. Limitations of the study include the retrospective nature, lack of sufficient information to calculate odds of preterm birth <24 weeks, and that the excised volume could only be calculated for a select group of women. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed a strong correlation between preterm birth and a volume of ≥0.5 cc excised cervical tissue, regardless of the severity of CIN. Caution should be taken when performing excisional treatment in women of reproductive age as well as prudence in case of multiple biopsies. Fertile women with a history of performing multiple biopsies or excisional treatment for CIN may benefit from close surveillance during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/surgery , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/diagnosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery
8.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 10(4): 391-398, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33906830

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the prevalence and carcinogenic risks of individual high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in all types of cervical cytology specimens in the Shanghai population. METHODS: A total of 124,251 cases with cotesting of cytology and HPV genotyping between October 2017 and February 2020 were included. RESULTS: The overall HPV positive rate was 24.3%, with 22.9% for HR-HPV and 6.1% for low-risk HPV. The top five most common HR-HPV subtypes were HPV 52/16/58/53/39 in the entire studied population, and HPV 16/53/56/51/39 in women with abnormal cytology. The most prevalent subtypes in negative/LSIL, HSIL, and glandular lesions were HPV 52, 16, and 18, respectively. HPV 16, 33, 26, 18, 58, and 82 were the most common subtypes significantly associated with an increased risk for HSIL + cytology. HPV 16/18 were present in 53.6% and 66.7%, and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were identified in 90.3% and 80.1% of HSIL and squamous cell carcinoma cytology, respectively. HPV 16/18 and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were detected in 37.0% and 44.4% of women with cytologic interpretation of in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study identified the most common HPV subtypes in each cytology category, and the carcinogenic risks of individual HR-HPV in the studied Shanghai population. The results would provide valuable information for the development of next-generation HPV vaccines and cervical cancer screening programs for the Chinese population, and, more specifically, the Shanghai metropolitan population.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genotype , Humans , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/diagnosis , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/pathology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
9.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 24(3): 252-258, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32384365

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate recurrence risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3+ and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)+ in a large population cohort of women previously treated for CIN 3/AIS. METHODS: Merging administrative databases with information on health services utilization and jurisdictional cancer registry, we identified all women undergoing treatment for CIN 3 or AIS from 2006 to 2010. Recurrence rate 1-5 years after treatment was defined as a biopsy finding of CIN 3/AIS or retreatment (loop electrosurgical excision procedure [LEEP], laser, cone, hysterectomy). Logistic regression was used to determine odds of recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 15,177 women underwent treatment for CIN 3 (n = 14,668) and AIS (n = 509). The recurrence rate for 5 years was greater for AIS (9.0%) compared with CIN 3 (6.1%). In a multivariate analysis, increased risk of recurrence was shown for age older than 45 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6), AIS compared with CIN 3 (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.5-3.5) first cytology after treatment showing high grade (HR = 12.4, 95% CI = 9.7-15.7), and no normal Pap smears after treatment (HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.2-3.7). There was no difference in recurrence risk with treatment type (cone vs LEEP: HR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.8-1.2, and laser vs LEEP: HR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8-1.4) or number of procedures per year performed by physicians (<40 vs >40 procedures: HR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence risk of CIN 3 and AIS is related to age, histology, and posttreatment cytology, which should assist with discharge planning from colposcopy. Definitive treatment with hysterectomy should be considered in women older than 45 years with additional risk factors for recurrence.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Ontario/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
10.
J Invest Dermatol ; 140(1): 48-55.e1, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288011

ABSTRACT

Second primary cancers (SPCs) are becoming a common cancer entity, which may interfere with survival in relatively benign first primary cancers. We examined the hypothesis that immune dysfunction may contribute to SPCs by assessing SPCs associated with known immune responsive skin cancers, invasive and in situ squamous cell carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancers were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry from the year 1958 to 2015. Standardized relative risks were calculated bidirectionally for any SPC after skin cancer and for skin cancer as SPC. Over 80,000 first primary cancers were identified for each invasive and in situ squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Bidirectional increased risks were observed for 26 cancers associated with invasive skin cancer; the Spearman rank correlation was 0.72 (P = 4.6 × 10-5). The highest bidirectional relative risks were for invasive and in situ skin cancer as SPCs (14.59 and 16.71, respectively). Remarkably high risks for second in situ squamous cell carcinoma of the skin were found after Kaposi sarcoma (685.68) and Merkel cell carcinoma (117.23). The high systematic bidirectional risks between immune responsive skin cancers and most other cancers suggest that immune suppression is a key mechanism contributing to an increased risk of SPCs.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Sarcoma, Kaposi/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunity , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk , Sweden/epidemiology , Tumor Microenvironment
11.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 617-626, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861114

ABSTRACT

US guidelines recommend that most women older than 65 years cease cervical screening after two consecutive negative cotests (concurrent HPV and cytology tests) in the previous 10 years, with one in the last 5 years. However, this recommendation was based on expert opinion and modeling rather than empirical data on cancer risk. We therefore estimated the 5-year risks of cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ [CIN3]) after one, two and three negative cotests among 346,760 women aged 55-64 years undergoing routine cotesting at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2003-2015). Women with a history of excisional treatment or CIN2+ were excluded. No woman with one or more negative cotests was diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. Five-year risks of CIN3 after one, two, and three consecutive negative cotests were 0.034% (95% CI: 0.023%-0.046%), 0.041% (95% CI: 0.007%-0.076%) and 0.016% (95% CI: 0.000%-0.052%), respectively (ptrend < 0.001). These risks did not appreciably differ by a positive cotest result prior to the one, two or three negative cotest(s). Since CIN3 risks after one or more negative cotests were significantly below a proposed 0.12% CIN3+ risk threshold for a 5-year screening interval, a longer screening interval in these women is justified. However, the choice of how many negative cotests provide sufficient safety against invasive cancer over a woman's remaining life represents a value judgment based on the harms versus benefits of continued screening. Ideally, this guideline should be informed by longer-term follow-up given that exiting is a long-term decision.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , California/epidemiology , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
12.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 810-818, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980692

ABSTRACT

Primary prevention through the use of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is expected to impact both cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). While CIN is well described, less is known about the epidemiology of AIS, a rare cervical precancer. We identified AIS and CIN grade 3 (CIN3) cases through population-based surveillance, and analyzed data on HPV types and incidence trends overall, and among women screened for cervical cancer. From 2008 to 2015, 470 AIS and 6,587 CIN3 cases were identified. The median age of women with AIS was older than those with CIN3 (35 vs. 31 years; p < 0.01). HPV16 was the most frequently detected type in both AIS and CIN3 (57% in AIS; 58% in CIN3), whereas HPV18 was the second most common type in AIS and less common in CIN3 (38% vs. 5%; p < 0.01). AIS lesions were more likely than CIN3 lesions to be positive for high-risk types targeted by the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines (HPV16/18, 92% vs. 63%; p < 0.01), and 9-valent vaccine (HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58, 95% vs. 87%; p < 0.01). AIS incidence rates decreased significantly in the 21-24 year age group (annual percent change [APC] overall: -22.1%, 95% CI: -33.9 to -8.2; APC among screened: -16.1%, 95% CI: -28.8 to -1.2), but did not decrease significantly in any older age group. This report on the largest number of genotyped AIS cases to date suggests an important opportunity for vaccine prevention of AIS, and is the first to document a decline in AIS incidence rates among young women during the vaccine era.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Precancerous Conditions/prevention & control , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
13.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 28(3): 602-609, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30792242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been observed in the United States through declining cervical precancer incidence in young women. To further evaluate vaccine impact, we described trends in HPV vaccine types 16/18 in cervical precancers, 2008-2014. METHODS: We analyzed data from a 5-site, population-based surveillance system. Archived specimens from women age 18-39 years diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+) were tested for 37 HPV types. We described the proportion and estimated number of cases of CIN2+ by HPV-type groups over time. Trends in HPV16/18-positive CIN2+ were examined, overall and by vaccination status, age, histologic grade, and race/ethnicity, using Cochrane-Armitage tests. RESULTS: In 10,206 cases, the proportion and estimated number of cases of HPV16/18-positive CIN2+ declined from 52.7% (1,235 cases) in 2008 to 44.1% (819 cases) in 2014 (P < 0.001). Declining trends in the proportion of HPV16/18-positive CIN2+ were observed among vaccinated (55.2%-33.3%, P < 0.001) and unvaccinated (51.0%-47.3%, P = 0.03) women; ages 18-20 (48.7%-18.8%, P = 0.02), 21-24 (53.8%-44.0%, P < 0.001), 25-29 (56.9%-42.4%, P < 0.001), and 30-34 (49.8%-45.8%, P = 0.04) years; CIN2 (40.8%-29.9%, P < 0.001) and CIN2/3 (61.8%-46.2%, P < 0.001); non-Hispanic white (59.5%-47.9%, P < 0.001) and non-Hispanic black (40.7%-26.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: From 2008-2014, the proportion of HPV16/18-positive CIN2+ declined, with the greatest declines in vaccinated women; declines in unvaccinated women suggest herd protection. IMPACT: The declining proportion of HPV16/18-positive CIN2+ provides additional evidence of vaccine impact in the United States.


Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/drug therapy , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Precancerous Conditions/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/trends , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Prognosis , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
14.
Int J Cancer ; 145(10): 2629-2638, 2019 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734284

ABSTRACT

We analysed patterns in the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN2, CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) by age and histology in 1992-2016 in Norway and described changes in screening tests. Incident cases of CIN2, CIN3, AIS and cervical cancer were identified in the Cancer Registry of Norway, as were all women with at least one screening test. The annual percentage change statistic was used to assess point estimates and changes in age-specific and age-standardised incidence rates (IR). Women aged 25-29 years had the highest incidence of cervical precancerous lesions (CIN2: 192.9/10, CIN3: 737.2/10, AIS: 32.5/105 in 2016). The IR of CIN2 increased for all screening ages (25-69 years) from 3.6% to 6.7% per year. CIN3 incidence increased by 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-2.6) annually. A steep increase in AIS incidence was observed in all age groups (7.1% per year, 95% CI 5.3-8.8). Changes in screening tests and the histological verification of cervical precancerous lesions alone cannot explain the steady increase in incidence we observed over the 25-year study period, and increased exposure to human papillomavirus (HPV) likely plays a role. Age-appropriate treatment of screening-detected cervical precancerous lesions is needed for effective cervical cancer control while avoiding overtreatment and related health risks. In order to perform an appropriate harm-benefit evaluation of cervical cancer control efforts, detailed information on screening technology and background risks, including HPV vaccination status, is needed to create optimal public health policy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaccination , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(8): 1282-1291, 2019 04 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We describe changes in rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+) during a period of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake and changing cervical cancer screening recommendations. METHODS: We conducted population-based laboratory surveillance for CIN2+ in catchment areas in 5 states, 2008-2015. We calculated age-specific CIN2+ rates per 100000 women by age groups. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of CIN2+ for 2-year periods among all women and among screened women to evaluate changes over time. RESULTS: A total of 16572 CIN2+ cases were reported. Among women aged 18-20 and 21-24 years, CIN2+ rates declined in all sites, whereas in women aged 25-29, 30-34, and 35-39 years, trends differed across sites. The percent of women screened annually declined in all sites and age groups. Compared to 2008-2009, rates among screened women were significantly lower for all 3 periods in women aged 18-20 years (2010-2011: IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.99; 2012-2013: IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85; 2014-2015: IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.68) and lower for the latter 2 time periods in women aged 21-24 years (2012-2013: IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; 2014-2015: IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: From 2008-2015, both CIN2+ rates and cervical cancer screening declined in women aged 18-24 years. The significant decreases in CIN2+ rates among screened women aged 18-24 years are consistent with a population-level impact of HPV vaccination.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/trends , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 29(1): e6, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29185264

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) and to assess the risk of recurrence and progression to invasive vaginal carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective review of the clinicopathologic data and clinical outcomes was performed on patients who were diagnosed with VAIN at a single center between January 2000 and July 2016. Demographics, treatments, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients with VAIN1-3 were included in the study analysis. The distribution of VAIN1-3 was as follows: VAIN1 31.1%, VAIN2 45.3%, and VAIN3/carcinoma in situ (CIS) 23.6%. In VAIN1 patients, observation was performed in 29.1% of the cases and 48.8% obtained regression. In VAIN2+ patients, management included observation (3.5%), topical management (6.5%), laser ablation (75.3%), excision (14.1%), and radiotherapy (0.5%) with the following rates of recurrence/progression: 46.2%, 62.5%, 26.4%, 32.7%, and 0%, respectively. Four patients among VAIN3/CIS patients (3.2%) developed invasive vaginal cancer during the follow-up period with a median time to cancer diagnosis of 21.4 months (range, 5.0-44.8 months). On multivariate analysis, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity and treatment method were found to be independent risk factors for recurrence and progression (p=0.003 and p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with VAIN are at high-risk of recurrence, but the risk of progression to vaginal cancer is relatively low. Laser or excision provides higher regression rate than topical agent or observation, and high-risk HPV positivity is a risk factor for recurrence. Whatever the treatment method is used, however, the high rate of recurrence warrants long-term follow-up surveillance.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Vaginal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/virology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vagina/pathology , Vagina/virology , Vaginal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult
17.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 110(7): 750-757, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281053

ABSTRACT

Background: Recognition that serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) may represent the first manifestation of many high-grade cancers that were once considered ovarian primary tumors has led to changes in diagnostic practices that could dramatically increase the reporting of tubal carcinomas in US population-based cancer registries. Further, increased detection of early-stage tubal carcinomas through increased recognition coupled with meticulous pathology processing protocols raises important unanswered questions about the clinical behavior of such lesions, which can only be answered using large data sets. However, rates of tubal carcinomas have not been recently analyzed. Accordingly, we analyzed population-based incidence and survival data for fallopian tube carcinoma in situ (CIS; an imperfect surrogate of STIC), tubal carcinomas, and for comparison, ovarian carcinomas, in the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) registries. Methods: Total counts, standardized incidence rates, and stage-specific survival were computed using 30 NAACCR registries (1999-2012). Temporal incidence rate patterns were analyzed by joinpoint regression with estimates of annual percentage change (APC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Fallopian tube CIS incidence rates were stable from 1999 to 2002, then increased from 2002 to 2012 (APC = 16.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.9% to 21.7%, P < .001). Rates of early- and late-stage tubal carcinomas showed similar patterns, whereas high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma rates were relatively stable. Five-year cause-specific survival was 97.9% (95% CI = 93.7% to 99.3%) for tubal CIS and 83.2% (95% CI = 77.3% to 87.7%) for early-stage high-grade serous tubal carcinoma. Conclusions: Reporting of tubal CIS and tubal carcinoma have increased in recent years, likely reflecting changes in pathology processing of specimens and diagnosis. Developing standardized reporting for tubal neoplasms is needed to enable analysis of outcomes for these comparatively uncommon but increasingly recognized tumors.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/epidemiology , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/epidemiology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/mortality , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Registries , SEER Program , Societies, Medical , Survival Analysis
18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(3): 339-345, 2018 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29029053

ABSTRACT

Background: The long-term effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine was assessed by monitoring the combined incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2, CIN3), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and cervical cancer related to HPV16 or HPV18. Methods: Women from Nordic countries of Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden who received a 3-dose regimen of the qHPV vaccine in the beginning of FUTURE II (Females United to Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease; V501-015, base study NCT00092534) are followed through different national registries. Effectiveness analyses were conducted approximately 2 years following completion of the base study and occur approximately every 2 years thereafter for 10 years (ie, 14 years from day 1 of the base study). Vaccine effectiveness against HPV16/18-related CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) was estimated by comparing the observed incidence with the expected incidence of CIN2+ in an unvaccinated cohort using historical registry data. Results: In the per-protocol population (2084 women) analysis of effectiveness after the first 12 years, there were no breakthrough cases of HPV16/18 CIN2+ after 9437 person- years of follow-up. Statistical power was sufficient to conclude that qHPV vaccine effectiveness remains above 90% for at least 10 years. The number of person-years during the follow-up interval of 10-12 years is continuing to accrue and shows a trend toward continuing effectiveness of the vaccine during that period. Conclusion: The qHPV vaccine shows continued protection in women through at least 10 years, with a trend for continued protection through 12 years of follow-up. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00092534. Study Identification: V501-015.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevention & control , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/therapeutic use , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccine Potency , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Norway/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
19.
BJOG ; 125(1): 74-79, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28678394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with pure adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) and mixed AIS/CIN 2/3 lesions including the incidence of AIS persistence, recurrence and progression to adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Statewide population in Western Australia. POPULATION: Women diagnosed with AIS between 2001 and 2012. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: De-identified linked data were utilised to ascertain the association between patient age at excisional treatment, margin status, lesion type, lesion size, and risk of persistent AIS (defined as the presence of AIS <12 months from treatment), recurrent AIS (≥12 months post-treatment), and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: 636 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean age was 32.3 years and median follow-up interval was 2.5 years. Within the study cohort, 266 patients (41.8%) had pure AIS and 370 (58.2%) had mixed AIS/CIN 2/3. Overall, 47 patients (7.4%) had AIS persistence/recurrence and 12 (1.9%) had adenocarcinoma. Factors associated with persistence/recurrence were pure AIS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3; 95%CI 1.28-3.94; P = 0.005), age >30 years (HR 2.1; 95%CI 1.16-3.81; P = 0.015), positive endocervical margins (HR 5.8; 95%CI 3.05-10.92; P = <0.001) and AIS lesions >8 mm (HR 2.5; 95%CI 1.00-6.20; P = 0.049). A histologically positive AIS ectocervical margin was not associated with persistence/recurrence. CONCLUSION: In this study, pure AIS was associated with greater risk of persistence/recurrence than was mixed AIS/CIN 2/3. AIS lesions >8 mm and positive endocervical margins were significant predictors for persistent or recurrent disease. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Pure cervical adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) may have greater risk of recurrence than AIS co-existing with CIN 2/3.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/mortality , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/mortality , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Reoperation/mortality , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Western Australia/epidemiology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/mortality , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(6): 884-889, 2017 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28520854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trends in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical lesions can provide an indication of vaccine impact. Our purpose was to measure trends in cervical lesions during 2008-2015 and to consider possible explanations including vaccination coverage, changes in screening for cervical cancer, and risk behaviors for acquiring HPV. METHODS: Connecticut (CT) implemented mandatory reporting of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2/3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher [CIN2+]) in 2008. Trends by age and birth cohort were modeled using negative binomial regression and change-point methods. To evaluate possible explanations for changes, these trends were compared to changes in HPV vaccination coverage, cervical cancer screening, an antecedent event to detection of a high-grade lesion, and changes in sexual behaviors and Chlamydia trachomatis, an infection with similar epidemiology to and shared risk factors for HPV. RESULTS: A significant decline in CIN2+ was first evident among women aged 21 years in 2010, followed by successive declines in women aged 22-26 years during 2011-2012. During 2008-2015, the rates of CIN2+ declined by 30%-74% among women aged 21-26 years, with greater declines observed in the younger women. Birth cohorts between 1985 and 1994 all experienced significant declines during the surveillance period, ranging from 25% to 82%. Ecological comparisons revealed substantial increases in HPV vaccination during this time period, and more modest reductions in cervical cancer screening and sexual risk behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The age and cohort patterns in our data suggest that declines in CIN2+ during 2008-2015 are more likely driven by HPV vaccination, introduced in 2006, than by changes in screening or risk behavior.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevention & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virology , Adult , Connecticut/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/trends , Female , Humans , Incidence , Unsafe Sex/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaccination Coverage/trends , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...