Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 15(3): 202-10, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16679862

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic removal of colorectal adenomas reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), but follow-up surveillance is recommended. Compliance with the Dutch surveillance guidelines and detection of neoplasia during follow-up has been evaluated in daily practice. From 1987 to 1996, 383 consecutive patients with colorectal adenomas (56.4% male, 61.8+/-11.3 years) were included and followed until December 2000. The mean follow-up was 80.5+/-42.5 months with 2.2+/-0.9 follow-up endoscopies. A total of 32.5 and 27.3% of follow-up endoscopies were performed >25% (time between advised and actual endoscopy) too late or too early, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 33.4% of patients had left the follow-up (two-thirds died) and 60.1% were known with co-morbidity. A first, second, third, fourth and fifth follow-up endoscopy had been performed in 327, 238, 132, 64 and 35 patients, respectively. Adenomatous polyps (with high-risk polyps) were detected in 100% (42.6%) of the index endoscopies and in 25.1% (17.4%), 23.9% (10.5%), 28.0% (12.1%), 34.4% (25.0%) and 37.1% (17.1%) of the first to fifth follow-up endoscopy, respectively. CRC was diagnosed in seven patients (46.1+/-22.9 months after index endoscopy), resulting in a standardized incidence ratio of 1.4 (confidence interval 0.6-3.0, P=0.4) compared to the general population. In this daily practice, high numbers of total and high-risk adenomatous polyps were found during follow-up surveillance. The incidence of CRC was not significantly different from the general population, which might be due to the intensive follow-up and removal of polyps. These findings support the importance of follow-up surveillance. However, the high overall morbidity and mortality should be taken into account when selecting patients for an intensive follow-up programme.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/epidemiology , Aftercare/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Population Surveillance , Adenoma/mortality , Adenoma/surgery , Adenomatous Polyps/rehabilitation , Adenomatous Polyps/surgery , Aged , Carcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/surgery , Cohort Studies , Colonic Polyps/rehabilitation , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...