The safety of an adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonist, rolofylline, in patients with acute heart failure and renal impairment: findings from PROTECT.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine exerts actions in multiple organ systems, and adenosine receptors are a therapeutic target in many development programmes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety of rolofylline, an adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonist, in patients with acute heart failure. METHODS: The effect of rolofylline was investigated in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with impaired renal function. Intravenous rolofylline 30 mg or placebo was infused over 4 hours daily for up to 3 days. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded from baseline through 7 and 14 days, respectively, and clinical events were adjudicated through 60 days. RESULTS: Of 2033 patients enrolled, 2002 received study drug randomized 2 : 1 to rolofylline or placebo. Rolofylline and placebo were associated with a similar risk of pre-specified groups of AEs or SAEs, other than selected neurological events. Investigator-reported seizures occurred in 11 (0.8%) rolofylline-treated patients and zero patients receiving placebo (p = 0.02). Stroke occurred in 21 (1.6%) patients assigned to rolofylline compared with 3 (0.5%) placebo-treated patients through 60 days with a greater risk for stroke in the rolofylline group (hazard ratio 3.49; 95% CI 1.04, 11.71; p = 0.043). There was no temporal relation to rolofylline administration and no specific stroke subtype or clinical characteristics that predicted stroke in the rolofylline group. CONCLUSIONS: Rolofylline treatment was associated with an increased seizure rate, an anticipated complication of A(1)-receptor antagonists. An unanticipated, disproportionate increase in strokes in the rolofylline-treated patients emerged, although no clear temporal relation, aetiology, stroke subtype or interacting factor suggestive of a causal mechanism was identified. Further research into stroke as a potential complication of adenosine-modulating therapies is required. Additionally, this study underscores the value of longer follow-up durations for AEs, even for agents with short treatment periods, such as in acute heart failure.

Pharmacokinetics of oral tonapofylline and its acyl-glucuronide metabolite in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline. Patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were enrolled in parallel with demographically matched healthy subjects. All study participants received a single 75-mg oral tonapofylline capsule. The pharmacokinetic parameters for both tonapofylline and its active metabolite, acyl-glucuronide (tonapofylline-AG), were affected by hepatic impairment significantly (P < .1) except for time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)), terminal half-life (t(½)), and apparent volume of distribution based on the terminal phase (Vdz/F). In the mild group, peak plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 to 48 hours postdose (AUC(48 h)), and from time 0 to infinity (AU(Cinf)) of tonapofylline modestly increased as compared with the control healthy subjects (GMR 1.62, 1.57, and 1.53, respectively). The extent of increase of these parameters for tonapofylline-AG was more profound than tonapofylline with geometric mean ratio (GMR) ranging from 2.02 to 2.08. Moderate hepatic impairment was also associated with modest increases of C(max), AUC(48 h), and AUC(inf) of tonapofylline (GMR 1.41, 1.98, and 2.08, respectively). Similar to the mild group, the increase of these parameters were higher for tonapofylline-AG with GMR ranging from 2.80 to 3.86. Single oral 75-mg tonapofylline was safe and well tolerated in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tonapofylline in subjects with severe renal impairment and in elderly subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tonapofylline in subjects with severe renal impairment and in elderly subjects. METHOD: Subjects with severe renal impairment were matched demographically with healthy subjects. Elderly subjects with normal renal function for their ages were also enrolled. All subjects (n = 8 per group) received a single intravenous administration of tonapofylline at 1 mg/kg. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline was not significantly different in subjects with severe renal impairment, or in elderly subjects, as compared to healthy subjects. Among all pharmacokinetic parameters, the only statistically significant difference was observed for Cmax between the healthy and the severe renal impairment groups, which was 21% and considered clinically insignificant. Pharmacodynamic assessment demonstrated the natriuretic effects of tonapofylline across groups, with little accompanying kaliuresis. No change in renal function occurred after single dose of tonapofylline, despite substantial increases in excretion of urinary sodium. Single 1 mg/kg intravenous administration of tonapofylline was generally safe. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline in subjects with severe renal impairment and elderly subjects with normal renal function for age is similar to that in healthy subjects. It has been demonstrated in all groups that tonapofylline has natriuretic effects and is able to maintain renal function, which can be beneficial to patients with congestive heart failure.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of tonapofylline: evaluation of dose proportionality, oral bioavailability, and gender and food effects in healthy human subjects.

Tonapofylline is an antagonist of adenosine A1 receptor being developed for heart failure. In the present studies, pharmacokinetic characteristics, including dose proportionality, bioavailability, and effects of gender and food, were evaluated in healthy subjects receiving single-dose tonapofylline (0.2-375 mg) in a parallel or crossover design. Following oral administration, tonapofylline concentrations mostly peaked within 3 hours and declined over time in a multiple phasic manner. Based on a power model, dose proportionality of peak concentration (C(max)), area under the time-concentration curve for all values (AUC(all)), and area under the time-concentration curve to infinity (AUC(inf)) was concluded in a clinical setting. The bioavailability of tonapofylline was 81.2% (90% confidence interval, 70.6%-93.5%). Following intravenous administration, the steady-state volume of distribution of tonapofylline was estimated to be 756 mL/kg. The total clearance of tonapofylline was low (64.8 mL/h/kg), approximately 5% of hepatic blood flow. The terminal half-life was variable within groups and ranged from 11.2 to 24.2 hours across the dose range. Female subjects showed significantly higher C(max), AUC(all), and AUC(inf) than male subjects (P < .05). Food decreased C(max) by approximately 39%, whereas it did not appear to affect AUC(all) and AUC(inf). The intersubject variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters of tonapofylline was generally less than 30%. In these studies, a single dose of tonapofylline was safe and well tolerated.

Effects of BG9928, an adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, in patients with congestive heart failure.

Previous studies suggest that adenosine A1 receptor antagonists may promote natriuresis without deleterious effects on renal function. This study evaluated renal and hemodynamic effects as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of BG9928, a selective adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, in patients with heart failure. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study, 33 patients received a single dose of BG9928 (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously. Change from baseline in urinary sodium excretion for the 8-hour postdose interval was greater for all dosing groups versus placebo. The 0.03-mg/kg and 0.3-mg/kg groups had significant reductions in body weight versus placebo (-0.8 kg, -1.1 kg, 0.3 kg, respectively; P < 005). No changes in creatinine clearance or hemodynamic parameters were observed among any of the BG9928 groups versus placebo. However, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure tended to decrease and correlated with weight loss. Across the range of doses studied, pharmacokinetic parameters were linear and predictable. One patient who received the highest dose (3.0 mg/kg) developed seizures, and no further patients received that dose. Single intravenous BG9928 doses of up to 1.0 mg/kg were well tolerated and increased sodium excretion without worsening renal function. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical benefit of adenosine A1 receptor antagonism.