Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 241: 237-243, 2017 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27810445

ABSTRACT

There are concerns about the zoonotic transmission of viruses through undercooked pork products. There is a lack of information on suitable indicator viruses for fecal contamination with pathogenic enteric viruses in the meat processing chain. The study compared the incidence and levels of contamination of hog carcasses with F-coliphages, porcine teschovirus (PTV), and porcine adenovirus (PAdV) at different stages of the dressing process to assess their potential as indicator viruses of fecal contamination. One hundred swab samples (200cm2) were collected from random sites on hog carcasses at 4 different stages of the dressing process and from retail pork over the span of a year from 2 pork processing plants (500/plant). Viable F-coliphages, PAdV DNA and PTV RNA were each detected on ≥99% of the incoming carcasses at both plants and were traceable through the pork processing chain. Significant correlations were observed between viable F-coliphages and PAdV DNA and between F-coliphages and PTV RNA but not between PAdV DNA and PTV RNA at the various stages of pork processing. Detection of viable F-coliphages was more sensitive than genomic copies of PAdV and PTV at low levels of contamination, making F-coliphages a preferred indicator in the pork slaughter process as it also provides an indication of infectivity. For plant A, F-RNA coliphages were detected in 25%, 63%, and 21% of carcass swabs after pasteurization, evisceration, and retail pork products, respectively. For plant B, F-coliphages were detected in 33%, 25%, and 13% of carcass swabs after skinning, evisceration, and retail pork samples, respectively. Viable F-RNA coliphages were genotyped. Viable F-RNA GII and GIII were generally not detected at the earlier stages of the slaughter process but they were detected on 13% of carcasses after evisceration and 2% of retail pork samples at plant A, which raises concerns of potential food handler contamination during pork processing. Consumers could be at risk when consuming undercooked meat contaminated with pathogenic enteric viruses.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Coliphages/isolation & purification , Feces/virology , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/virology , Teschovirus/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Animals , Coliphages/genetics , Food Handling , Swine , Teschovirus/genetics
2.
Viruses ; 6(6): 2505-18, 2014 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960273

ABSTRACT

Contamination of cell cultures is the most common problem encountered in cell culture laboratories. Besides the secondary cell contaminations often occurring in the cell laboratories, the contaminations originating from donor animal or human tissue are equally as common, but usually harder to recognize and as such require special attention. The present study describes the detection of porcine adenovirus (PAdV), strain PAdV-SVN1 in cultures of normal porcine urothelial (NPU) cells isolated from urinary bladders of domestic pigs. NPU cell cultures were evaluated by light microscopy (LM), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and additionally assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Characteristic ultrastructure of virions revealed the infection with adenovirus. The adenoviral contamination was further identified by the sequence analysis, which showed the highest similarity to recently described PAdV strain PAdV-WI. Additionally, the cell ultrastructural analysis confirmed the life-cycle characteristic for adenoviruses. To closely mimic the in vivo situation, the majority of research on in vitro models uses cell cultures isolated from human or animal tissue and their subsequent passages. Since the donor tissue could be a potential source of contamination, the microbiological screening of the excised tissue and harvested cell cultures is highly recommended.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/classification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Adenoviruses, Porcine/ultrastructure , Animals , Cell Culture Techniques , Cells, Cultured , Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral , DNA, Viral , Epithelial Cells/virology , Genes, Viral , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Swine
3.
J Virol Methods ; 206: 5-11, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24880068

ABSTRACT

Increasing attention is being paid to the impact of agricultural activities on water quality to understand the impact on public health. F-RNA coliphages have been proposed as viral indicators of fecal contamination while porcine teschovirus (PTV) and porcine adenovirus (PAdV) are proposed indicators of fecal contamination of swine origin. Viruses and coliphages are present in water in very low concentrations and must be concentrated to permit their detection. There is little information comparing the effectiveness of the methods for concentrating F-RNA coliphages with concentration methods for other viruses and vice versa. The objective of this study was to compare 5 current published methods for recovering F-RNA coliphages, PTV and PAdV from river water samples concentrated by electronegative nitrocellulose membrane filters (methods A and B) or electropositive Zeta Plus 60S filters (methods C-E). Method A is used routinely for the detection of coliphages (Méndez et al., 2004) and method C (Brassard et al., 2005) is the official method in Health Canada's compendium for the detection of viruses in bottled mineral or spring water. When river water was inoculated with stocks of F-RNA MS2, PAdV, and PTV to final concentrations of 1×10(6) PFU/100 mL, 1×10(5) gc/100 mL and 3×10(5) gc/100 mL, respectively, a significantly higher recovery for each virus was consistently obtained for method A with recoveries of 52% for MS2, 95% for PAdV, and 1.5% for PTV. When method A was compared with method C for the detection of F-coliphages, PAdV and PTV in river water samples, viruses were detected with higher frequencies and at higher mean numbers with method A than with method C. With method A, F-coliphages were detected in 11/12 samples (5-154 PFU/100 mL), PTV in 12/12 samples (397-10,951 gc/100 mL), PAdV in 1/12 samples (15 gc/100 mL), and F-RNA GIII in 1/12 samples (750 gc/100 mL) while F-RNA genotypes I, II, and IV were not detected by qRT-PCR.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Levivirus/isolation & purification , Rivers/virology , Teschovirus/isolation & purification , Water Pollution , Water Quality , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Canada , Filtration/methods , Levivirus/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Teschovirus/genetics , Virus Attachment
4.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 167(2): 177-85, 2013 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135674

ABSTRACT

In recent years, numerous foodborne outbreaks due to consumption of berry fruit contaminated by human enteric viruses have been reported. This European multinational study investigated possible contamination routes by monitoring the entire food chain for a panel of human and animal enteric viruses. A total of 785 samples were collected throughout the food production chain of four European countries (Czech Republic, Finland, Poland and Serbia) during two growing seasons. Samples were taken during the production phase, the processing phase, and at point-of-sale. Samples included irrigation water, animal faeces, food handlers' hand swabs, swabs from toilets on farms, from conveyor belts at processing plants, and of raspberries or strawberries at points-of-sale; all were subjected to virus analysis. The samples were analysed by real-time (reverse transcription, RT)-PCR, primarily for human adenoviruses (hAdV) to demonstrate that a route of contamination existed from infected persons to the food supply chain. The analyses also included testing for the presence of selected human (norovirus, NoV GI, NoV GII and hepatitis A virus, HAV), animal (porcine adenovirus, pAdV and bovine polyomavirus, bPyV) and zoonotic (hepatitis E virus, HEV) viruses. At berry production, hAdV was found in 9.5%, 5.8% and 9.1% of samples of irrigation water, food handlers' hands and toilets, respectively. At the processing plants, hAdV was detected in one (2.0%) swab from a food handler's hand. At point-of-sale, the prevalence of hAdV in fresh raspberries, frozen raspberries and fresh strawberries, was 0.7%, 3.2% and 2.0%, respectively. Of the human pathogenic viruses, NoV GII was detected in two (3.6%) water samples at berry production, but no HAV was detected in any of the samples. HEV-contaminated frozen raspberries were found once (2.6%). Animal faecal contamination was evidenced by positive pAdV and bPyV assay results. At berry production, one water sample contained both viruses, and at point-of-sale 5.7% and 1.3% of fresh and frozen berries tested positive for pAdV. At berry production hAdV was found both in irrigation water and on food handler's hands, which indicated that these may be important vehicles by which human pathogenic viruses enter the berry fruit chain. Moreover, both zoonotic and animal enteric viruses could be detected on the end products. This study gives insight into viral sources and transmission routes and emphasizes the necessity for thorough compliance with good agricultural and hygienic practice at the farms to help protect the public from viral infections.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Food Handling/methods , Fruit/virology , Adenoviruses, Human/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Agricultural Irrigation , Animals , Cattle , Czech Republic , Disease Outbreaks , Enterovirus , Feces/virology , Finland , Food Supply , Hand/virology , Hepatitis A virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Humans , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Poland , Polyomavirus/isolation & purification , Serbia , Swine , Viruses , Water Microbiology
5.
Water Res ; 47(14): 5101-9, 2013 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23866141

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is responsible for many enterically transmitted viral hepatitides around the world. It is currently one of the waterborne diseases of global concern. In industrialized countries, HEV appears to be more common than previously thought, even if it is rarely virulent. In Switzerland, seroprevalence studies revealed that HEV is endemic, but no information was available on its environmental spread. The aim of this study was to investigate -using qPCR- the occurrence and concentration of HEV and three other viruses (norovirus genogroup II, human adenovirus-40 and porcine adenovirus) in influents and effluents of 31 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Switzerland. Low concentrations of HEV were detected in 40 out of 124 WWTP influent samples, showing that HEV is commonly present in this region. The frequency of HEV occurrence was higher in summer than in winter. No HEV was detected in WWTP effluent samples, which indicates a low risk of environmental contamination. HEV occurrence and concentrations were lower than those of norovirus and adenovirus. The autochthonous HEV genotype 3 was found in all positive samples, but a strain of the non-endemic and highly pathogenic HEV genotype I was isolated in one sample, highlighting the possibility of environmental circulation of this genotype. A porcine fecal marker (porcine adenovirus) was not detected in HEV positive samples, indicating that swine are not the direct source of HEV present in wastewater. Further investigations will be necessary to determine the reservoirs and the routes of dissemination of HEV.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Wastewater/virology , Adenoviruses, Human/genetics , Adenoviruses, Human/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Animals , Chemical Fractionation , Feces/virology , Filtration/methods , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Humans , Norovirus/genetics , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Seasons , Swine , Switzerland , Water Microbiology
6.
J Virol Methods ; 158(1-2): 130-5, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19428581

ABSTRACT

The Adenoviridae family comprises a wide diversity of viruses that may be excreted for long periods in feces or urine. Previous studies have suggested that the detection of human and animal adenoviruses as well as human and animal polyomaviruses by PCR could be used as an index of fecal contamination of human and animal origin. In this study, quantitative PCR assays targeting specifically porcine adenoviruses have been developed and applied to fecal and environmental samples, including pig slurries, urban sewage, slaughterhouse sewage and river water samples. To develop real-time quantitative PCR for the detection and quantitation of porcine adenoviruses, primers and a TaqMan probe targeting a 68-bp region of the porcine adenovirus hexon gene were designed to amplify specifically porcine adenovirus, and the conditions of the reaction were optimized. The assay detected 1-10 genome copies per test tube and was specific in showing no positive results when samples containing human or bovine adenoviruses were analyzed. Fecal samples contained mean concentrations of porcine adenoviruses of 10(5) GC/g while slaughterhouse wastewater samples showed mean values of 10(3) GC/ml. The assay detected porcine fecal pollution in samples that were highly diluted and had been collected at a considerable distance from the input source, such as river water. In general, the data presented here provide a quantitative tool for the analysis of porcine adenoviruses as indicators of the presence of porcine contamination in the environment, and support the detection of porcine adenoviruses by real-time quantitative PCR as a promising and valuable tool for source-tracking studies.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Environmental Pollution , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Rivers/virology , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Animals , DNA Primers/genetics , Feces/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sewage/virology , Swine
7.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 70(3): 1448-54, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15006765

ABSTRACT

In this study, a molecular procedure for the detection of adenoviruses of animal origin was developed to evaluate the level of excretion of these viruses by swine and cattle and to design a test to facilitate the tracing of specific sources of environmental viral contamination. Two sets of oligonucleotides were designed, one to detect porcine adenoviruses and the other to detect bovine and ovine adenoviruses. The specificity of the assays was assessed in 31 fecal samples and 12 sewage samples that were collected monthly during a 1-year period. The data also provided information on the environmental prevalence of animal adenoviruses. Porcine adenoviruses were detected in 17 of 24 (70%) pools of swine samples studied, with most isolates being closely related to serotype 3. Bovine adenoviruses were present in 6 of 8 (75%) pools studied, with strains belonging to the genera Mastadenovirus and Atadenovirus and being similar to bovine adenoviruses of types 2, 4, and 7. These sets of primers produced negative results in nested PCR assays when human adenovirus controls and urban-sewage samples were tested. Likewise, the sets of primers previously designed for detection of human adenovirus also produced negative results with animal adenoviruses. These results indicate the importance of further studies to evaluate the usefulness of these tests to trace the source of fecal contamination in water and food and for environmental studies.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Feces/virology , Mastadenovirus/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Human/classification , Adenoviruses, Human/genetics , Adenoviruses, Human/isolation & purification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/classification , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Cattle , DNA Primers/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Humans , Mastadenovirus/classification , Mastadenovirus/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Sewage/virology , Species Specificity , Sus scrofa
8.
Intervirology ; 44(6): 350-4, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11805441

ABSTRACT

To identify and characterize the protein encoded by the E2A region of porcine adenovirus (PAV)-3, DNA sequence coding for a portion (amino acids 102-457) of the DNA binding protein (DBP) open reaching frame was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase protein of Schistosoma japonica. The affinity-purified fusion protein was used to immunize rabbits. Immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis demonstrated that the antisera specifically recognized a protein of 50 kD in PAV-3-infected cells. Immunoperoxidase staining detected the DBP protein predominantly in the nucleus of the cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that DBP was detected as early as 6 h after infection and remained detectable throughout the infection. Based on these results, a novel assay for quantitation of PAV-3 was established. The assay is less time consuming and can be performed in different porcine cells. In addition, virus titers determined by this assay are comparable to the standard plaque assay.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus E2 Proteins/metabolism , Adenoviruses, Porcine/metabolism , Adenovirus E2 Proteins/biosynthesis , Adenovirus E2 Proteins/genetics , Adenovirus E2 Proteins/immunology , Adenoviruses, Porcine/genetics , Adenoviruses, Porcine/isolation & purification , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Cell Line, Transformed , Glutathione Transferase/genetics , Rabbits , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Swine , Viral Plaque Assay
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...