Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer is the most deadly deadliest gynecological tumor in the female reproductive system. Therefore, the present study sought to determine the diagnostic performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA SR), the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian tumors. The study also assessed whether a combination of the two ultrasound categories systems and CA125 can improve the diagnostic performance. METHODS: A total of 453 patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors were retrospectively enrolled from Fujian Cancer Hospital between January 2017 and September 2020. The data collected from patients included age, maximum lesion diameter, location, histopathology, levels of CA125, and detailed ultrasound reports. Additionally, all ultrasound images were independently assessed by two ultrasound physicians with more than 5 years of experience in the field, according to the IOTA simple rules and O-RADS guidelines. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the above mentioned predictors were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Out of the 453 patients, 184 had benign lesions, while 269 had malignant ovarian tumors. In addition, the AUCs of IOTA SR, O-RADS, and CA125 in the overall population were 0.831, 0.804, and 0.812, respectively, and the sensitivities of IOTA SR, O-RADS, and CA125 were 94.42, 94.42, and 80.30%, respectively. On the other hand, the AUCs of IOTA SR combined with CA125, O-RADS combined with CA125, and IOTA SR plus O-RADS combined with CA125 were 0.900, 0.891, and 0.909, respectively. The findings also showed that the AUCs of a combination of the three approaches were significantly higher than those of individual strategies (p<0.05) but not significantly higher than the AUC of a combination of two methods (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings showed that a combination of IOTA SR or O-RADS in combination with CA125 may improve the ability to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian tumors.

Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.

OBJECTIVES: For patients presenting with adnexal mass, it is important to correctly distinguish whether the mass is benign or malignant for the purpose of precise and timely referral and implication of correct line of management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Risk of malignancy Indexes (RMI) 1-4, Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in differentiating the adnexal mass into benign and malignant. METHODS: A retrospective study using 155 patients diagnosed with adnexal mass between January 2014 to December 2014 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. The patient records were assessed for age, menopausal status, serum CA125 and HE4 levels, ultrasound characteristics of the pelvic mass and the final pathological diagnosis of the mass. RMI1, RMI2, RMI3, RMI4, ROMA were calculated for each patient and the sensitivity, specificity and the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves were determined for each test to evaluate their performance. RESULTS: Among 155 patients with adnexal masses meeting inclusion criteria, 120 (77.4%) were benign, 8 (5.2%) borderline and 27 (17.4%) were malignant. RMI2 and RMI4 had the highest sensitivity (66.7%) while HE4 had the highest specificity (96.9%).Although ROMA had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886 it was not found to be statistically superior to the other tests. For epithelial ovarian cancers, ROMA (80%), HE4 (96.9%) and RMI 4 (0.868) had the highest sensitivity, specificity and AUC respectively however, the AUC characteristics were not statistically significant between any groups. Compared to the postmenopausal group (sensitivity 72.2-77.8%) all the tests showed lower sensitivity (42.9%) for the premenopausal group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: RMI 1-4, ROMA and HE4 were all found to be useful for differentiating benign/borderline adnexal masses from malignant ones for deciding optimal therapy, however no test was found to be significantly better than the other. None were able to differentiate between benign and borderline tumors. All of the tests demonstrated increased sensitivity when borderline tumors were considered low-risk, and when only epithelial ovarian cancers were considered.

Comparison of CA 125 alone and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in patients with adnexal mass: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the performance of CA 125 and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) from benign adnexal mass. We consecutively enrolled 782 patients referred to tertiary hospitals with adnexal mass requiring surgical treatment. A total 322 of patients with benign adnexal disease and 327 patients with EOC were included in the analysis. Using reference cut-off values in premenopausal women, ROMA had better specificity (0.926 vs. 0.787, P < 0.001) and accuracy (0.875 vs. 0.777, P < 0.001) than CA 125 alone and comparable sensitivity (0.707 vs. 0.747, P = 0.549). Using optimum cut-off values in premenopausal women, CA 125 and ROMA had comparable specificity (0.922 vs. 0.947, P < 0.001) and accuracy (0.871 vs. 0.868, P = 0.879); however, sensitivity for CA 125 was inferior to that of ROMA (0.707 vs. 0.613, P = 0.039). In postmenopausal women, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were comparable between CA 125 alone and ROMA using either reference cut-off values or optimum cut-off values.ROMA showed better diagnostic performance in differentiating EOC from benign adnexal tumors among premenopausal women. However, in postmenopausal women, ROMA did not show any benefit over CA 125 alone.

Clinical Performance Comparison of Two In-Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays (IVDMIAs) for Presurgical Assessment for Ovarian Cancer Risk.

INTRODUCTION: Adnexal or pelvic mass is a finding that commonly raises suspicion for malignancy, especially for ovarian cancer. Proper identification prior to surgery would permit appropriate referral to a specialty center in cases likely to be ovarian cancer, as optimal outcomes in such cases are obtained when surgical staging and treatment are provided at the time of initial surgery. METHODS: We compared the screening capabilities of two in vitro diagnostic multivariate index assays (IVDMIAs), a new IVDMIA (second-generation multivariate index assay: MIA2G) and a currently used triage algorithm (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Assay: ROMA). RESULTS: Among 245 subjects (24.7%) determined to have a malignancy, ROMA misclassified 51 malignancies (including 10 high-grade ovarian malignancies), whereas MIA2G misclassified 22 (including 5 high-grade ovarian malignancies). Early stage cancers were more frequently misclassified by ROMA (20 vs. 8 cases). The rate of "test-negative" malignancies was significantly higher for ROMA, while the rate of "test-positive" benign cases was significantly higher for MIA2G. CONCLUSION: Triage algorithms play an important role in improving clinical outcomes for women presenting with an adnexal mass regardless of the eventual diagnosis. In this study, MIA2G was shown to correctly predict more cases of ovarian cancer than the ROMA algorithm. FUNDING: Aspira Labs/Vermillion Inc.

Chronic tubal pregnancy manifesting as a heterogeneous adnexal mass with prominent neovascularization in a woman with a negative serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin level.

A 41-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 1) underwent elective termination of pregnancy at approximately 7 weeks of gestation. At 1 month after the elective abortion, she was referred due to abnormal results in a cervical cytological examination. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed a heterogeneous mass of 16 mm in diameter in the left adnexal region. At 3 months after her referral, the asymptomatic left adnexal mass had increased to 55 mm in diameter. Prominent vascular flow was detected in the solid portion by color Doppler ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging showed suspected hemorrhage in the left adnexal cystic mass. Three-dimensional computerized tomographic angiography showed the prominent development of tortuous blood vessels in the left adnexal region, which originated from the left ovarian artery. The patient had a negative ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level. Left salpingectomy was performed by a single-port laparoscopic approach. A pathological examination revealed degenerated villous tissue with ß-hCG-positive syncytiotrophoblasts.

The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.

BACKGROUND: Adnexal masses indicate a variety of gynecological and nongynecological disorders, which may be benign or malignant. Early detection of malignancy is crucial to a proper planning of treatment and improvement of survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of risk of malignancy index (RMI) in prediction of malignant adnexal mass. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study which included 101 women with adnexal masses. RMI2 with cutoff value of 200 was used to discriminate between benign and malignant tumors. Histopathological examination was used to confirm the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of the studied women, 20.8% proved to have malignant tumors. The RMI showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 96.2%, a positive predictive value of 87.5%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. The RMI identified malignant cases more accurately than any individual criterion in diagnosing ovarian cancer. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of the RMI, CA 125, ultrasound, and menopausal status were significantly high with values of 1.0, 0.99, 0.86, and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSION: The RMI is a simple sensitive, practical, and reliable tool in preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses that can facilitate selection of cases for timely referral to oncology center.

Combined symptom index and second-generation multivariate biomarker test for prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with an adnexal mass.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a symptom index (SI) and multivariate biomarker panel in the identification of ovarian cancer in women presenting for surgery with an adnexal mass. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of patients seen at a tertiary medical center. Following consent, patients completed an SI and preoperative serum was collected for individual markers (CA 125) and a second-generation FDA-cleared biomarker test (MIA2G). Results for the SI and MIA2G were correlated with operative findings and surgical pathology. Logistic regression modeling was performed to assess the interaction of the SI with MIA2G to determine the risk of malignancy (ROM). RESULTS: Of the 218 patients enrolled, the mean age was 53.6 years (range 18-86). One-hundred and forty-seven patients (67.4%) were postmenopausal. Sixty-four patients (29.4%) had epithelial ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer (EOC/FTC) and 17 (7.8%) had borderline ovarian tumors. A positive SI or MIA2G correctly identified 96.1% of patients with EOC/FTC. Using logistic regression, we found that both SI and MIA2G score were significantly associated with ROM (p < 0.001). In a simulation with disease prevalence set at 5%, patients with a negative SI and a MIA2G score of 6 had a ROM of 1.8% whereas patients with the same MIA2G and positive SI had a 10.5% ROM, nearly a 6-fold higher risk. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a patient-reported symptom index and refined biomarker panel allows for improved accuracy in the assessment for ovarian cancer in patients with an adnexal mass. This strategy could offer a personalized approach to addressing ROM to triage patients with an adnexal mass to appropriate care.

Clinical Use and Optimal Cutoff Value of Ca15-3 in Evaluation of Adnexal Mass: Retrospective Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic performance and reference values of serum cancer antigen (Ca)15-3 levels in the triage of adnexal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in 481 patients referred to the Gynecology Department at Carmel Medical Center due to adnexal mass between years 2005 and 2012. All patients underwent surgery with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis and routine preoperative measurements of serum Ca125 and Ca15-3. RESULTS: Combination of Ca125 with Ca15-3 elevated the sensitivity of Ca125 alone (from 86.9% to 93.2%; P=0.029), along with reduction of its specificity (from 80.5% to 69.5%; P=0.005) in differentiation between malignant and benign cases. According to receiver operating characteristic curve, Ca15-3 level of 21 U/mL was shown to be the optimal reference value for malignancy detection. All cases with Ca15-3 levels above 44.5 U/mL were malignant, mostly of primary ovarian source. CONCLUSIONS: As Ca15-3 assessment allowed detection of significantly more malignancy cases, we believe that measurement of this marker in combination with Ca125 is worthwhile in patients presenting with adnexal masses. The cutoff of 21 U/mL seems to be the optimal value in this specific population. High Ca15-3 levels (above 44.5 U/mL) strongly direct to a diagnosis of malignancy, mostly of primary ovarian tumors rather than breast malignancy.

Can Replacing CA125 with HE4 in Risk of Malignancy Indices 1-4 Improve Diagnostic Performance in the Presurgical Assessment of Adnexal Tumors?

AIMS: To assess whether replacing CA125 with HE4 in the classical formulas of risk of malignancy indices (RMIs) can improve diagnostic performance. METHODS: For each of 312 patients with an adnexal mass, classical RMIs 1-4 were computed based on ultrasound score, menopausal status, and serum CA125 levels. Additionally, modified RMIs (mRMIs) 1-4 were recalculated by replacing CA125 with HE4. RESULTS: Malignant pathology was diagnosed in 52 patients (16.67%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) between each classical RMI and its corresponding mRMI. In the entire sample, the AUC was 0.899, 0.900, 0.895, and 0.908 for classical RMIs 1-4 compared to 0.903, 0.929, 0.930, and 0.931 for mRMIs 1-4. In premenopausal patients, the AUC was 0.818, 0.798, 0.795, and 0.802 for classical RMIs 1-4 compared to 0.839, 0.875, 0.876, and 0.856 for mRMIs 1-4. In postmenopausal patients, the AUC was 0.906, 0.895, 0.896, and 0.906 for classical RMIs 1-4 compared to 0.907, 0.923, 0.924, and 0.930 for mRMI 1-4. CONCLUSIONS: Use of HE4 instead of CA125 did not significantly improve diagnostic performance of RMIs 1-4 in patients with an adnexal mass.

Preoperative C-reactive protein serum levels as a predictive diagnostic marker in patients with adnexal masses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels as a preoperative predictive marker for ovarian cancer in patients with adnexal masses. METHODS: CRP serum levels of 1843 adnexal masses and subsequent surgery were investigated (patients with benign ovarian tumors: n=1423; borderline tumor of the ovary [BTO]: n=83; EOC: n=337). Test characteristics and predictive values of CRP serum levels were investigated by univariate analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) serum CRP levels in patients with benign ovarian tumors, BTO, and EOC were 0.4 (0.1-0.6)mg/dL, 0.5 (0.2-0.9)mg/dL, and 1.6 (0.5-5.4)mg/dL, respectively (p<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of the combination of CRP and CA-125 was 80.1% and 90.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.2% and 76.9%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, CRP serum levels were independently associated with presence of BTO and EOC (HR 6.7 [5.2-8.5], p<0.001 and HR 2.2 [1.4-3.3], p<0.001). The combination of CRP and CA-125 serum levels resulted in a number needed to treat of 2.11 to detect one case of EOC or BTO. CONCLUSION: CRP serum levels independently predicted the presence of BTO and EOC in patients with suspicious adnexal masses. CRP serum levels seem to be of additional value to CA-125 in the preoperative differential diagnosis of adnexal masses and might be particularly in combination with CA-125 clinically useful.

1,138 women with adnexal mass: pathologic findings according to age.

Purpose ofinvestigation: Influence of the patients' age are not well established to predict the malignancy potential of adnexal masses. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of women's age on both histopathology and malignancy potential of adnexal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review study. Patients who were operated for suspected adnexal masses were included in the study. Malignancy potentials of tumors were divided in benign and at least borderline in univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analyses and RR calculations were performed according to malignancy potential for age, serum cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels and menopause status. RESULTS: A total of 1,138 women were included for this study; median age was 39 (16-92) years. Patients > 50 years had 5.920 times higher risk (95% CI 4.091-8.566; p = 0.0001) of having at least borderline tumor compared the younger group. The risk of at least borderline pathology was calculated as 3.723 (95% CI 2.595-5.342;p = 0.0001) in patients with CA 125 ≥ 35 IU/ml compared to the others. In multivariate analyses, only ≥ 35 IU/ml CA 125 level and > 50 years age groups were defined as independent variables for having at least borderline tumor. (OR: 4.456, 95% CI 2.982-6.659, p = 0.0001 and OR: 3.134, 95% CI 1.435-6.843, p = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study; the age of > 50 years was detected as an independent factor for having at least borderline pathology for adnexal masses. The data from these results might be used as a differential diagnostic tool in a new combination for benign and malignant adnexal masses in future studies.

Chromosomal Instability in Cell-Free DNA as a Highly Specific Biomarker for Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Women with Adnexal Masses.

Purpose: Chromosomal instability is a hallmark of ovarian cancer. Here, we explore copy-number alteration (CNA) profiling in cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker to detect malignancy in patients presenting with an adnexal mass.Experimental Design: We prospectively enrolled 68 patients with an adnexal mass, of which 57 were diagnosed with invasive or borderline carcinoma and 11 with benign disease. Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and analyzed by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing.Results: Patterns of chromosomal instability were detectable in cell-free DNA using 44 healthy individuals as a reference. Profiles were representative of those observed in matching tumor tissue and contained CNAs enriched in two large datasets of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Quantitative measures of chromosomal instability, referred to as genome-wide z-scores, were significantly higher in patients with ovarian carcinoma than in healthy individuals or patients with benign disease. Cell-free DNA testing improved malignancy detection (AUC 0.89) over serum CA-125 (AUC 0.78) or the risk of malignancy index (RMI, AUC 0.81). AUC values of cell-free DNA testing even further increased for HGSOC patients specifically (AUC 0.94). At a specificity of 99.6%, a theoretical threshold required for ovarian cancer screening, sensitivity of cell-free DNA testing was 2- to 5-fold higher compared with CA-125 and RMI testing.Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating the potential of cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer using chromosomal instability as a read-out. We present a promising method to increase specificity of presurgical prediction of malignancy in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Cancer Res; 23(9); 2223-31. ©2016 AACR.

Preoperative measurement of serum C-reactive protein: is it useful in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses?

BACKGROUND: Serum biomarkers may help to discriminate malignant from benign adnexal masses with equivocal features on imaging. Adequate discrimination of such tumors is crucial for referring patients to either a specialized cancer center or a nonspecialized gynecology service. AIM: We aimed to investigate whether the preoperative level of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), alone or combined with CA125 and menopausal status in the Ovarian Score (OVS), is useful in the prediction of malignancy in women with ovarian tumors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 293 patients who underwent surgery in a tertiary cancer center. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curves (AUC) for CRP, CA125 and OVS were calculated in different scenarios, as well as their sensitivity and specificity, using standard cutoff points (for CRP, 10 mg/L; for CA125, 35 U/mL). RESULTS: CA125 and the OVS performed significantly better than CRP alone in the differentiation of benign disease from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (AUC = 0.86 for CA125, 0.79 for OVS, and 0.73 for CRP). OVS and CRP alone were superior to CA125 only in the differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors from advanced stages of EOC and non-EOC. Sensitivity and specificity were 52.5% and 83%, respectively, for CRP, 77.9% and 66.7% for CA125, and 71.3% and 67.8% for OVS. CONCLUSIONS: OVS is as good as CA125 in the differentiation of benign tumors from ovarian cancer. The addition of CA125 and menopausal status to CRP enhanced the relatively low discriminatory power of isolated CRP.

Preoperative HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the preoperative differentiation benign ovarian diseases from epithelial ovarian cancer depending on the menopausal status. METHODS: In order to estimate markers' concentrations in the serum of women with benign ovarian disease (n = 128) and with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (n = 96) the electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) technique has been applied. RESULTS: Using the ROC analysis, although no statistical differences were found among their AUCs, the ROMA algorithm seems to be effective in gathering the diverse performance of HE4 and CA125. The AUC for HE4, CA125 and ROMA for all patients were: 0.895; 0.879 and 0.918, respectively. At established new optimal cutoff values for HE4, CA125 and ROMA we found higher specificity in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal women (96.9 vs 89.8 % and 97.7 vs 84.1 % and 95.9 vs 89.1 %, respectively). The sensitivity of HE4 in pre- and postmenopausal women was similar (83.5 vs 83.8 %), while for CA125 was the highest in premenopausal women (87.0 vs 84.1 %). For HE4, CA125 and ROMA the negative predictive value was high (97.6, 93.9 and 94.4 %, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ROMA algorithm shows the best diagnostic performance to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian disease. We found the high specificity of HE4 and CA125 while differentiating ovarian benign diseases from epithelial ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women and the high sensitivity of CA125 in detecting epithelial ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients.

Usefulness of the preoperative platelet count in the diagnosis of adnexal tumors.

Platelets seem to play a role in the development of ovarian cancer. Platelet count (PLT) is an ubiquitous available parameter. We analyzed retrospectively data of 756 patients with primary adnexal tumors: 584 benign and 172 malignant (148 invasive and 24 borderline) cases. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CA125, PLT, and a combination of CA125 and PLT. The cutoff values for CA125 and PLT were 35 U/ml and 350/nl, respectively. The median age of patients with benign and malignant tumors was 45 and 64 years, respectively. A total of 77/172 (44.8 %) malignant and 50/584 (8.6 %) benign cases presented with thrombocytosis (PLT ≥350/nl). The median PLT differed between benign and malignant cases (257/nl vs. 330/nl; p < 0.001), similarly as CA125 did (17 vs. 371 U/ml; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age, CA125, and thrombocytosis predicted independently the presence of malignancy. The results of CA125 were false positive in 21 % and false negative in 13 %. If considered together, thrombocytosis + CA125 were false positive only in 9 %, whereas the false negative rate was 12 %. The sensitivity and specificity of CA125, thrombocytosis, and thrombocytosis + CA125 for detecting adnexal malignancy were 0.88/0.78, 0.45/0.91, and 0.81/0.94, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of CA125, thrombocytosis, and thrombocytosis + CA125 was 0.79, 0.61, and 0.91, respectively. In conclusion, PLT is an ubiquitously available parameter that could be useful in the diagnostic evaluation of pelvic mass. Considering thrombocytosis additionally to CA125 improves the specificity and PPV and reduces the false positive rate in detecting adnexal malignancy.

Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.

Adnexal masses can have gynecologic or nongynecologic etiologies, ranging from normal luteal cysts to ovarian cancer to bowel abscesses. Women who report abdominal or pelvic pain, increased abdominal size or bloating, difficulty eating, or rapid satiety that occurs more than 12 times per month in less than a year should be evaluated for ovarian cancer. Pelvic examination has low sensitivity for detecting an adnexal mass; negative pelvic examination findings in a symptomatic woman should not deter further workup. Ectopic pregnancy must be ruled out in women of reproductive age. A cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) test may assist in the evaluation of an adnexal mass in appropriate patients. CA 125 levels are elevated in conditions other than ovarian cancer. Because substantial overlap in CA 125 levels between pre- and postmenopausal women may occur, this level alone is not recommended for differentiating between a benign and a malignant adnexal mass. Transvaginal ultrasonography is the first choice for imaging of an adnexal mass. Large mass size, complexity, projections, septation, irregularity, or bilaterality may indicate cancer. If disease is suspected outside of the ovary, computed tomography may be indicated; magnetic resonance imaging may better show malignant characteristics in the ovary. Serial ultrasonography and periodic measurement of CA 125 levels may help in differentiating between benign or potentially malignant adnexal masses. If an adnexal mass larger than 6 cm is found on ultrasonography, or if findings persist longer than 12 weeks, referral to a gynecologist or gynecologic oncologist is indicated.

Validation of a second-generation multivariate index assay for malignancy risk of adnexal masses.

BACKGROUND: Women with adnexal mass suspected of ovarian malignancy are likely to benefit from consultation with a gynecologic oncologist, but imaging and biomarker tools to ensure this referral show low sensitivity and may miss cancer at critical stages. OBJECTIVE: The multivariate index assay (MIA) was designed to improve the detection of ovarian cancer among women undergoing surgery for a pelvic mass. To improve the prediction of benign masses, we undertook the redesign and validation of a second-generation MIA (MIA2G). STUDY DESIGN: MIA2G was developed using banked serum samples from a previously published prospective, multisite registry of patients who underwent surgery to remove an adnexal mass. Clinical validity was then established using banked serum samples from the OVA500 trial, a second prospective cohort of adnexal surgery patients. Based on the final pathology results of the OVA500 trial, this intended-use population for MIA2G testing was high risk, with an observed cancer prevalence of 18.7% (92/493). Coded samples were assayed for MIA2G biomarkers by an external clinical laboratory. Then MIA2G results were calculated and submitted to a clinical statistics contract organization for decoding and comparison to MIA results for each subject. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated, among other measures, and stratified by menopausal status, stage, and histologic subtype. RESULTS: Three MIA markers (cancer antigen 125, transferrin, and apolipoprotein A-1) and 2 new biomarkers (follicle-stimulating hormone and human epididymis protein 4) were included in MIA2G. A single cut-off separated high and low risk of malignancy regardless of patient menopausal status, eliminating potential for confusion or error. MIA2G specificity (69%, 277/401 [n/N]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.4-73.4%) and PPV (40%, 84/208; 95% CI, 33.9-47.2%) were significantly improved over MIA (specificity, 54%, 215/401; 95% CI, 48.7-58.4%, and PPV, 31%, 85/271; 95% CI, 26.1-37.1%, respectively) in this cohort. Sensitivity and NPV were not significantly different between the 2 tests. When combined with physician assessment, MIA2G correctly identified 75% of the malignancies missed by physician assessment alone. CONCLUSION: MIA2G specificity and PPV were significantly improved compared with MIA, while sensitivity and NPV were unchanged. The second-generation test significantly improved the predicted efficiency of triage vs MIA without sacrificing high sensitivity and NPV, which are essential for effectiveness.

Do preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor and migration-inhibitory factor predict the nature of the adnexal masses? A prospective-controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to identify the role of preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and migration inhibitor factor (MIF) in differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses, as well as the relationship between prognostic factors and VEGF and MIF in ovarian cancer patients. This prospective study included 41 patients who were admitted between November 2010 and March 2012. In the malignant group, there were 21 patients, and remaining 20 had benign adnexal masses. Age, CA125 levels, grade, stage, presence of ascites and the degree of cytoreduction performed were noted. There was no significant difference between two groups in preoperative serum VEGF and MIF levels (p = 0.118 and p = 0.297, respectively). CA125 levels were significantly higher in the malignant group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference for VEGF and MIF between the groups evaluated for tumour grade, stage, presence of ascites and degree of cytoreduction performed in the malignant group. Preoperative serum, VEGF and MIF levels are not suitable for the differentiation of malignant and benign adnexal masses, and they do not correlate with the prognostic factors of ovarian cancer in this cohort of patients.

Clinical, ultrasound parameters and tumor marker-based mathematical models and scoring systems in pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumors.

The choice of management for patients with adnexal tumors requires careful pre-surgical assessment. In case of adnexal masses, the diagnostic difficulties arise from the heterogenic nature of the adnexal diseases, presence of multiple functional changes, and lack of early symptoms of malignancy. A reliable pre-surgical differentiation cannot be performed using clinical features, ultrasound examination, or tumor markers alone. New diagnostic techniques and novel markers are under investigations, however no single test can be used to conclusively differentiate between malignant and non-malignant adnexal masses. Mathematical models and scoring systems based on different clinical, ultrasonographic and laboratory parameters alone or together may facilitate the diagnosis. Selected mathematical models and scoring systems are presented in this article. Models using only ultrasound features include simple rules, regression models, Gynecologic Imaging Report and Data System, and various morphologic scores. Some logistic regression models are based on multiple clinical and ultrasound data. The OVA1 test is based on five tumor markers without using other data. The Risk of Malignancy Algorithm uses two tumor markers with one clinical parameter. i.e. the menopausal status. Some models used clinical, ultrasound and tumor marker data together. This group of models includes risk of malignancy indices, artificial neural networks, and the ADNEX model. Although some of these models have been compared in the literature, more prospective studies are needed to select the most effective model, to develop the existing models, or to create new more effective models of oncological assessment of the adnexal tumors.

Utility Serum Marker HE4 for the Differential Diagnosis Between Endometriosis and Adnexal Malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the utility of serum human epididymal secretory protein E4 (HE4) biomarker in the differential diagnosis of endometriosis and adnexal malignancies. METHODS: Multicentric prospective observational study between January 2010 and December 2011 in 4 European centers (Italy, Portugal, Latvia, and Spain) was carried out. We collected 981 healthy patients diagnosed with adnexal patology and selected 65 patients diagnosed with endometriosis and analyzed their serum markers CA125, HE4, and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) index. We also analyzed all cases of malignant histology and divided them according to CA125 levels (negative, ≤35 U/mL; intermediate, >35-150 U/mL; and highly positive, >150 U/mL). RESULTS: HE4 was positive only in 1.5% of cases, CA125 in 64.6%, and ROMA index in 14.1%. In the subgroup intermediate CA125 values, positive HE4 is very specific (91.2%) correctly classifying patients with benign disease, but with lower sensibility (66.1%); however, ROMA index showed a high sensibility (89.3%), with a false-positive rate of 42.8%. CONCLUSIONS: HE4 can be a very useful biomarker to exclude malignant disease in patients with endometriosis.