Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 81
Filter
1.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am ; 33(3): 397-409, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823812

ABSTRACT

Child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) play a crucial role beyond the provision of clinical care. CAPs are uniquely placed to understand and help patients navigate the fine line among psychiatric care, health and well-being, and the laws and policies supporting or impairing these processes. Focusing on vulnerable populations, such as legal system impacted youth and families, CAPs can contribute to the ongoing development of a more just and equitable world for the children of today and of tomorrow.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry , Child Psychiatry , Physician's Role , Humans , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Psychiatrists
4.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr ; 68(4): 305-315, 2019 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31044672

ABSTRACT

For the Benefit of the Children - Judical Requested Counselling of High Conflict Parents in Educational- and Family-Counselling Educational- and Family Counselling supports families as assistance for parenting for a successful growing up of children. Family Counselling is a voluntary offer, which is provided by a multi professional team. The counselling is confidential and bound to secrecy. According to the regulations of the law concerning the proceedings in family cases and the non-contentious jurisdiction (FamFG) the court has several options for action, such as, for example, to order a counselling in the context of child and youth service. Court related inquiries have led to advancement in Educational- and Family Counselling. In the article basic aspects of specific approaches are described.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Counseling/legislation & jurisprudence , Family Therapy , Parenting , Parents/education , Parents/psychology , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/methods , Child , Child Psychiatry/methods , Humans , Parenting/psychology
7.
Neuropsychiatr ; 31(3): 133-143, 2017 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28853003

ABSTRACT

Since 1 July 2012 the Austrian Ombudsman Board (AOB) together with its six regional expert commissions form the so called "National Prevention Mechanism" implementing the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). The commissions are mandated to conduct regular, unrestricted and unannounced visits to all types of places in which there is or can be a deprivation or restriction of personal liberty, such as prisons, police stations, but also psychiatric hospitals or residential homes/groups for children and juveniles supervised by youth welfare services. 20 monitoring visits have been held in departments for Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry between 2012 and 2016. In the field of residential groups for young people 40 visiting protocols (out of a total of 176 between 2015 and 2016) have been chosen for this analysis. The following article overviews the legal sources and key issues of the monitoring process in this field as well as the commissions' findings and recommendations.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Abuse/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Abuse/prevention & control , Child Protective Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child, Institutionalized/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights Abuses , Adolescent , Austria , Child , Child Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Freedom , Human Rights Abuses/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights Abuses/prevention & control , Humans , Social Participation/psychology , Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Violence/prevention & control
13.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 46: 7-19, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27033974

ABSTRACT

Previous research on juvenile judges' decision-making process has neglected the role of the different actors involved in judicial procedures. The decision can be considered as a result of information exchange between the different actors involved. The process of making a decision is equally important as the decision itself, especially when the decision considers minors with mental disorders. The presence and the type of interaction determine the information available to the juvenile judges to make their final decision. The overall aim of this study is to gain insight into the role of all actors, including the juvenile judge, in the juvenile judge's decision-making process in cases relating to minors with mental disorders. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with professional actors (n=32), minors (n=31) and parents (n=17). The findings indicated that the judge's decision is overall the result of an interaction between the juvenile judge, the social services investigator and the youth psychiatrist. The other professional actors, the minors and the parents had only a limited role in the decision-making process. The research concludes that the judge's decision-making process should be based on dialogue, and requires enhanced collaboration between the juvenile court and youth psychiatrists from mental health services. Future decision-making research should pay more attention to the interactions of the actors that guide a juvenile judge's decision.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Judicial Role , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Minors/legislation & jurisprudence , Minors/psychology , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Belgium , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Parents/psychology , Patient Admission , Patient Care Team/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional-Family Relations
14.
Nervenarzt ; 87(4): 367-75, 2016 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) regulation 1901/2006 plus the implementation of pediatric investigational plans by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have contributed to more clinical studies in pediatric psychopharmacology. A new drug market law (AMNOG) has been in force in Germany since 2011 that requires an additional process of assessment of benefits of newly authorized medications by the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G­BA), which also holds for medications licensed for pediatric populations. OBJECTIVES: Summary of early assessments of benefits for newly registered compounds in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and critical discussion from the perspective of child and adolescent psychiatry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Application and critical review of documents and written statements by various institutions and stakeholders related to assessment procedures and respective decisions by the G­BA for these medications. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Clearly differing requirements for study designs and outcome parameters characterize the conditions for market authorization and for the assessment of benefits. Further adjustments to the regulations in implementing the AMNOG appear to be essential, integrating agencies involved so far, complimented by expertise from regulatory agencies and medical scientific societies.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Marketing of Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychopharmacology/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Approval/economics , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Germany , Health Care Reform/economics , Legislation, Drug , Marketing of Health Services/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychotherapy/economics , Psychotherapy/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychotropic Drugs , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence
16.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir ; 47(6): 343-7, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26562008

ABSTRACT

Physical deformities may cause psychological stress and lead to psychological disorders in children and adolescents. On the other hand, the correction of non-pathological conditions is a legal issue in patients unable to consent, a group that is partly made up of minors. This article provides an overview on available evidence on the psychological consequences of physical deformities, psychiatric contraindications for plastic surgery due to psychological disorders, and on the issue of minors' ability to consent.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child Psychiatry , Congenital Abnormalities/psychology , Congenital Abnormalities/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Psychotherapy , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/diagnosis , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/psychology , Child , Child Psychiatry/ethics , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/psychology , Minors/psychology , Parental Consent/ethics , Parental Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Parental Consent/psychology , Psychotherapy/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics
19.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother ; 43(6): 397-409, 2015 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602045

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite substantial opposition in the practical field, based on an amendment to the Hospital Financing Act (KHG). the so-called PEPP-System was introduced in child and adolescent psychiatry as a new calculation model. The 2-year moratorium, combined with the rescheduling of the repeal of the psychiatry personnel regulation (Psych-PV) and a convergence phase, provided the German Federal Ministry of Health with additional time to enter a structured dialogue with professional associations. Especially the perspective concerning the regulatory framework is presently unclear. METHOD: In light of this debate, this article provides calculations to illustrate the transformation of the previous personnel regulation into the PEPP-System by means of the data of §21 KHEntgG stemming from the 22 university hospitals of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In 2013 there was a total of 7,712 cases and 263,694 calculation days. In order to identify a necessary basic reimbursement value th1\t would guarantee a constant quality of patient care, the authors utilize outcomes, cost structures, calculation days, and minute values for individual professional groups according to both systems (Psych-PV and PEPP) based on data from 2013 and the InEK' s analysis of the calculation datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose a normative agreement on the basic reimbursement value between 270 and 285 EUR. This takes into account the concentration phenomenon and the expansion of services that has occurred since the introduction of the Psych-PV system. Such a normative agreement on structural quality could provide a verifiable framework for the allocation of human resources corresponding to the previous regulations of Psych-PV.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry/economics , Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Psychiatry/economics , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Financial Management, Hospital/economics , Financial Management, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Hospitals, Psychiatric/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, University/economics , Hospitals, University/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Relative Value Scales , Adolescent , Child , Costs and Cost Analysis/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/legislation & jurisprudence
20.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother ; 43(4): 231-42, 2015 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118811

ABSTRACT

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities became legally binding in Germany in March 2009. "Inclusion" is the major concept­all people with any kind of handicap must have the same rights to full and effective participation and inclusion in society. Preceding inclusion come adjustments in society with regard to ethical, legislative, administrative, conceptual, structural, economical, and thus also to healthcare-political frameworks, in order to make disabilities are as far as possible no longer a handicap in an individual's everyday life. This review first outlines the present social status influencing the development of children, a child's welfare, and especially the healthcare of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders and conditions indicating barriers to inclusion. It focuses on those articles of the UN convention which are relevant with regard to ethical attitude, epidemiology, healthcare framework, diagnostics, therapy, teaching, and research with respect to child and adolescent psychiatry. The analysis points to a significant backlog demand in child psychiatric healthcare, teaching, and research.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Psychiatry , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child Behavior Disorders/psychology , Child Behavior Disorders/rehabilitation , Child Psychiatry , Disabled Children/psychology , Disabled Children/rehabilitation , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Social Discrimination , Social Participation/psychology , Adolescent , Adolescent Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Disabled Children/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Needs and Demand/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Discrimination/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Justice/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...