Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 83: 66-80, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27871870

ABSTRACT

Perfluoroalkyls are stable synthetic chemicals, able to repel oils, fats and water. These compounds have been used in the manufacturing of products such as Teflon®, lubricants, paints, fire-fighting foams, coatings for pans, carpets, clothes, and paperboard for packaging, among others. It is believed that populations are exposed constantly to them. Its regulation in the world is under development and several controversies are in the course of litigation. One occupational study shows bladder cancer risk. This paper intends to review scientific information on the most critical perfluoroalkyl compound and proposes a procedure to get a cancer-risk categorization which PFOS can cause to populations. METHODS: As a guiding axis, we used the IARC process for developing monographs of carcinogenic risks. We used the SIGN guides for evaluating the quality of studies in human populations; and finally, we used the Squire method for evaluating studies in laboratory animals. Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity was found in human studies mainly due to chance, threshold effect and confounders. In experimental animal studies, inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity was found in view of the number of affected species, different types of neoplasms, dose-response relationship and genotoxicity found in in-vivo and in-vitro studies. In this proposal, we concluded that cancer risk for PFOS, according to the IARC method, is not classifiable as carcinogenic to humans (group 3).


Subject(s)
Alkanesulfonic Acids/toxicity , Carcinogens/toxicity , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/chemically induced , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , Fluorocarbons/toxicity , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Terminology as Topic , Alkanesulfonic Acids/classification , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests , Carcinogens/classification , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Environmental Pollutants/classification , Fluorocarbons/classification , Humans , Mutagenicity Tests , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Occupational Diseases/genetics , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
2.
Toxicol Sci ; 123(2): 349-58, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750347

ABSTRACT

The fish early life-stage (FELS) test guideline (OECD 210 or OCSPP 850.1400) is the most frequently used bioassay for predicting chronic fish toxicity and supporting aquatic ecological risk assessments around the world. For each chemical, the FELS test requires a minimum of 360 fish and 1 to 3 months from test initiation to termination. Although valuable for predicting fish full life-cycle toxicity, FELS tests are labor and resource intensive and, due to an emphasis on apical endpoints, provide little to no information about chemical mode of action. Therefore, the development and implementation of alternative testing strategies for screening and prioritizing chemicals has the potential to reduce the cost and number of animals required for estimating FELS toxicity and, at the same time, provides insights into mechanisms of toxicity. Using three reference chemicals with well-established yet distinct adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) in early life stages of fish, we proposed FELS-specific AOPs as conceptual frameworks for identifying useful chemical screening and prioritization strategies. The reference chemicals selected as case studies were a cardiotoxic aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin), neurotoxic acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (chlorpyrifos), and narcotic surfactant (linear alkylbenzene sulfonate). Using qualitative descriptions for each chemical during early fish development, we developed generalized AOPs and, based on these examples, proposed a three-tiered testing strategy for screening and prioritizing chemicals for FELS testing. Linked with biologically based concentration-response models, a tiered testing strategy may help reduce the reliance on long-term and costly FELS tests required for assessing the hazard of thousands of chemicals currently in commerce.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Fishes/physiology , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Life Cycle Stages/drug effects , Mass Screening/methods , Alkanesulfonic Acids/classification , Alkanesulfonic Acids/pharmacokinetics , Alkanesulfonic Acids/toxicity , Animal Testing Alternatives , Animals , Chlorpyrifos/classification , Chlorpyrifos/pharmacokinetics , Chlorpyrifos/toxicity , Hazardous Substances/classification , Hazardous Substances/pharmacokinetics , Health Priorities , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/classification , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/pharmacokinetics , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/toxicity , Research Design , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests, Chronic
3.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 60(7): 1130-5, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20451932

ABSTRACT

This is the first study to report the concentrations and accumulation profiles of PFCs in marine mammals from Korea. The concentrations and profiles of 10 PFCs in the liver of minke whales and common dolphins from Korean coastal waters were recorded in this study. The mean concentrations of PFOS and PFUnDA were 3-20 times higher than that found for other PFCs analyzed. The concentrations of PFOS in cetaceans from Korea were relatively lower than those reported in other countries. Inter-species differences in the concentrations of PFOS, PFOSA and PFNA were found between two cetacean species, while no difference was observed in the concentrations of PFDA, PFUnDA and PFDoDA between the species. The dominant PFC compounds found in cetaceans were PFUnDA and PFOS, accounting for 70-80% of the PFCs. The accumulation profiles and correlation analysis indicated that two cetacean species have different exposure routes and metabolic capacity for PFCs.


Subject(s)
Alkanesulfonic Acids/metabolism , Common Dolphins/metabolism , Fluorocarbons/metabolism , Minke Whale/metabolism , Seawater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism , Alkanesulfonic Acids/classification , Animals , Environmental Monitoring , Fluorocarbons/classification , Korea , Liver/chemistry , Liver/metabolism , Species Specificity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...