Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31584017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trichoscopy is a reliable instrument for diagnosis and for tracking therapy-related changes in female pattern hair loss (FPHL). Videodermoscopic diagnosis of FPHL has been established, which requires fine measurements of hair-related parameters; the method requires an expensive equipment/digital program. AIM: To determine whether a low-cost, simple USB dermoscope can ascertain the hair-related changes in early FPHL. METHODS: An age-matched, cross-sectional study was performed over 3 years on subjects with less than 6-month history of hair loss and without an obvious broadening of midline hair parting. Trichoscopic analysis of the frontal and occipital scalp of the study subjects were performed, using a USB-connected dermoscope. The subjects were analyzed for the presence of microscopic hair changes in the form of anisotrichosis, vellus-like hair, single hair follicle unit, peri-pilar sign and yellow dots. RESULTS: A total of 230 cases and 230 controls were analyzed. The dermoscopic hair changes were found to be significantly associated with the frontal scalp zone of cases. LIMITATIONS: Histopathological evaluation of the cases was not done. CONCLUSION: Microscopic changes recorded with the help of a simple USB dermoscope are helpful in establishing a diagnosis of FPHL even in early disease.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/economics , Dermoscopy/economics , Health Resources/economics , Scalp/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermoscopy/methods , Female , Hair Follicle/pathology , Humans , Young Adult
10.
Acta Oncol ; 53(1): 80-7, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24059270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alopecia is a frequently occurring side effect of chemotherapy that often can be prevented by cooling the scalp during the infusion. This study compared effects and costs of scalp cooling with usual general oncological care, i.e. purchasing a wig or head cover. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Scalp-cooled patients (n = 160) were compared with non-scalp-cooled patients (n = 86) at 15 Dutch hospitals. Patients were enrolled prior to anthracycline and/or taxane-based chemotherapy for several types of cancer between 2007 and 2008. Cost-effectiveness of scalp cooling compared with that of usual care was determined by the ratio of costs to quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs for scalp cooling (machines and nursing time), hair dressers, wigs and head covers were estimated from a societal perspective. QALYs were measured using the Short Form-36. RESULTS: Scalp cooling reduced the use of a wig or head cover by 40%, but wigs were still purchased unnecessarily by 38% of scalp-cooled patients. Average societal costs decreased therefore only by €269 per patient due to scalp cooling (p = 0.02). Given the eligibility for scalp cooling at the time, the insignificant difference in QALYs resulted from a balance of the benefits for those patients with successful scalp cooling and those without success. For the Dutch, given the generally accepted threshold of willingness to pay for a QALY (between €20 000 and €40 000), scalp cooling was cost-effective, therefore justifying the choice of scalp cooling or purchasing a wig or head cover. CONCLUSION: Given the right indication, cost-effectiveness might be improved further by postponing wig and head cover purchases, by improving scalp cooling efficacy, as well as using the scalp cooling capacity more intensively.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/economics , Alopecia/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Hypothermia, Induced/economics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Scalp , Adult , Aged , Alopecia/chemically induced , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/economics , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
11.
Am J Manag Care ; 7(4): 345-53, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310190

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients willingness to share the costs of 2 medications (often described as "lifestyle medications"): sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and finasteride for hair loss, which are not routinely covered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. STUDY DESIGN: Self-administered, anonymous survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult men (n = 339) were recruited from waiting rooms for primary care or erectile dysfunction clinic appointments at 2 Los Angeles VA facilities. RESULTS: Participants with self-reported need were analyzed separately for finasteride (primary care patients only) and sildenafil (both primary care and erectile dysfunction clinic patients). The mean age of the participants was 56 and 60 years for the finasteride and sildenafil groups, respectively. Mean annual household income for both groups was under $10,000. Respondents reported a mean willingness to cost-share $4.20 for a 30-day prescription of daily finasteride (VA wholesale cost = $27) and $5.40 for 4 sildenafil pills (VA wholesale cost = $20). In the multivariate analysis, higher income (P = .002) and increasing self-reported need for medication (P = .04) were associated with increased willingness to cost-share for finasteride after controlling for age, race/ethnicity, insured status, comorbid conditions, and type of clinic. In addition, younger age (P = .01) was associated with greater willingness to cost-share for sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-income veteran population, patients with a self-reported need for sildenafil and finasteride would be willing to make a higher copayment than the current VA maximum copayment of $2.00 per 30-day prescription, if these medicines were made available.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/economics , Attitude to Health , Cost Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs , Enzyme Inhibitors/economics , Erectile Dysfunction/economics , Finasteride/economics , Piperazines/economics , Adult , Aged , Alopecia/drug therapy , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy , Finasteride/therapeutic use , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Veterans/economics , Hospitals, Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Los Angeles , Male , Middle Aged , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Purines , Sildenafil Citrate , Sulfones
13.
Saudi Med J ; 21(9): 821-5, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11376357

ABSTRACT

Hair transplantation is a technique in which hair follicles are harvested from the occipital area and re-transplanted in the frontal bald area. Hair transplantation is the most common cosmetic procedure in the United States nowadays despite the fact that it is expensive. Usually, patients need more than one session to receive a cosmetically acceptable result and patients need to be understanding and have realistic expectations. Although most of our patients are males, females represent about 10-15% of our new patients. This article reviews the basic principals of hair transplantation and describes new and improved techniques of hair transplantation.


Subject(s)
Alopecia/surgery , Hair Follicle/transplantation , Hair/transplantation , Adult , Alopecia/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Humans , Male , Saudi Arabia , Surgery, Plastic/economics , Surgery, Plastic/instrumentation , Surgical Instruments , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...