Hexamethylmelamine as consolidation treatment for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with hexamethylmelamine (HMM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients treated at our hospital between January 1997 and November 2006 and in documented clinical complete response from advanced ovarian cancer following front-line platinum-based therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients treated with HMM were compared to the patients of matched counterpart without consolidation therapy. Of 102 patients enrolled, 49 were treated with HMM and 53 received no consolidation treatment. For patients with HMM and observed patients, the mean age were 54.6 and 55.6 yr; the distribution of stage was similar (P=0.977); the optimal surgery was performed in 36 (73.5%) and 44 (83%) (P=0.336); the recurrence rate were 27 (55.1%) and 33 (62.3%) (P=0.463); and the median progression-free survival were 38 months and 21 months for patients with HMM and observed patients (P=0.235). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the follow-up period. Although this study failed to show the significant survival benefit of consolidation therapy with HMM in patients with advanced EOC, we consider that our study can contribute data to investigate the effectiveness of consolidation therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Hexamethylmelamine as Consolidation Treatment for Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response after First-Line Chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with hexamethylmelamine (HMM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients treated at our hospital between January 1997 and November 2006 and in documented clinical complete response from advanced ovarian cancer following front-line platinum-based therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients treated with HMM were compared to the patients of matched counterpart without consolidation therapy. Of 102 patients enrolled, 49 were treated with HMM and 53 received no consolidation treatment. For patients with HMM and observed patients, the mean age were 54.6 and 55.6 yr; the distribution of stage was similar (P=0.977); the optimal surgery was performed in 36 (73.5%) and 44 (83%) (P=0.336); the recurrence rate were 27 (55.1%) and 33 (62.3%) (P=0.463); and the median progression-free survival were 38 months and 21 months for patients with HMM and observed patients (P=0.235). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the follow-up period. Although this study failed to show the significant survival benefit of consolidation therapy with HMM in patients with advanced EOC, we consider that our study can contribute data to investigate the effectiveness of consolidation therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of oral Altretamine in women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who responded (PR or CR) to first line chemotherapy but relapsed within 6 months. The protocol was later amended to include patients with relapse within 12 months. METHODS: A multicentric phase II trial. The patients had to have measurable disease. No more than one prior chemotherapy regiment was allowed. The patients were treated with 260 mg/m(2)/day of Altretamine in four divided doses for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The response was evaluated after every two courses. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible patients were treated with a median of 3 courses of Altretamine (range 1-12). Hematological toxicity was minimal. Gastrointestinal toxicity was common. Response evaluation was possible for 26 patients. Three patients (9.7% intent-to-treat) achieved a partial response. Eight patients had stable disease, and 15 patients had progressive disease after two treatment courses. The median time to progression was 10 weeks (range, 5-51 weeks). Medial survival was 34 weeks (range, 7-112+). CONCLUSION: Altretamine should not be chosen as standard treatment in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. However, Altretamine represents a useful alternative in patients who prefer oral treatment or when socioeconomic considerations are an important issue.

Altretamine for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A Hoosier Oncology Group trial.

Thirty patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated on a phase 11 trial with altretamine. Altretamine was administered orally at a dosage of 260 mg/m2 days 1 through 14 with cycles repeated every 28 days. Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities. Ten percent (3 of 30) experienced Grade 3 gait abnormalities. None of the thirty evaluable patients achieved a complete or partial response. In summary, altretamine did not show antitumor activity in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II trial of oral altretamine for consolidation of clinical complete remission in women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG-9326).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year survival rate in a group of women in complete clinical remission (cCR) from Stage III ovarian cancer following front-line therapy who were then treated with a 6-month course of altretamine. METHODS: Patients were documented to be in cCR by physical examination, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan, and serum CA-125. Treatment consisted of altretamine (Hexalen) 260 mg/m(2)/day po divided into four doses taken after meals and at bedtime for 14 of 28 days for six cycles. Based on previous experience in the Southwest Oncology Group, the treatment would be considered promising if the 2-year survival rate was > or = 65% as measured from study registration. RESULTS: From 9/1/93 and 7/1/97, 112 patients were registered and 97 were fully evaluable. The majority of patients had optimally debulked (< or = 1 cm: 63%), high-grade (Grade 3: 82%) tumors. The 2-year survival rate in this study was 75% (95% CI: 66-84%). For those patients with optimal disease, the 2-year survival rate was 82% (95% CI: 72-92%) and for those with suboptimal disease it was 64% (95% CI: 48-79%). Four patients (4%) experienced Grade 4 and 21 patients (22%) experienced Grade 3 toxicities consisting primarily of nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, fatigue, anxiety, and paresthesias. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year survival rate in this study warrants further evaluation of consolidation therapy for women in clinical complete remission following front-line chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer. Caution is advised in the interpretation of these data, however, because of the nonrandomized nature of the trial and the unknown contribution of front-line use of paclitaxel to the durability of clinical complete response.

[Combination chemotherapy with hexamethylamine (Hexalen, Altretamine, Hexastat) and sarcolysine in advanced ovarian carcinoma]. / Kombinirovannaia khimioterapiia geksametilmelaminom (Geksalenom, Altretaminom, Geksastatom) i sarkolizinom pri rasprostranennom rake iaichnikov.

Combination chemotherapy with hexamethylmelamine (hexalen, altretamine, hexastat), 100 mg, thrice a day, per os, 14 days (out of a 28-day course) and sarcolysin, 15 mg, per os, during the first 5 days of the course, was received by 24 patients with primary advanced tumors of the ovaries, prior to or after cytoreductive surgery. Total apparent response to chemotherapy among 19 patients of the study group was 47.2%, clinically significant (plus stabilization)--94.5%, without significant untoward side-effects (vomiting--19%; leukopenia degree II-III--33% and thrombocytopenia--19%). The drug proved an active component of combination therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) in platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: In an effort to critically examine the antitumor activity of altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, the Gynecologic Oncology Group initiated a Phase II trial of the agent administered in this clinical setting. METHODS: Altretamine was administered at a dose of 260 mg/m2 orally for 14 days in a 28-day course. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable side effects prevented further therapy. A total of 36 patients (median age: 56.5) were treated on this trial, of whom 33 were evaluable for toxicity and 30 for response. All patients had previously received either cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel. RESULTS: The major side effect was emesis (grade 3-4, 7/33, 21%). The objective response rate was 10% (one complete response, two partial responses). CONCLUSION: We conclude that altretamine has limited activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Hexamethylmelamine as a single second-line agent in ovarian cancer: follow-up report and review of the literature.

From December 1982 to December 1986, 52 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with single-agent HMM. Chemotherapy was given for a period of 1 year unless progression of disease or toxicity was noted. Survival was determined from the time of diagnosis to the date of death or September 30, 1992. The regimen was well tolerated with only one case of severe gastrointestinal toxicity. Nine patients were found to be clinically free of disease following completion of HMM treatment; they had initially responded to cisplatin-based therapy (i.e., potentially cisplatin-sensitive) and subsequently recurred. Four were found to have gross disease at the time of reassessment laparotomy. Three of these 9 patients are alive 81-92 months since diagnosis, having maintained disease-free intervals of up to 6 years. The median survival for the 9 patients without evidence of disease at the end of therapy was 75 months versus 9 months for the nonresponders. No patient who had progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (i.e., primary cisplatin-resistant) responded to second-line single-agent oral hexamethylmelamine. With a follow-up close to 10 years, our data show that hexamethylmelamine, with reasonable toxicity, can provide an extended, disease-free interval to a selected group of patients.

N-(Hydroxymethyl) melamines.

1. The N-(hydroxymethyl) melamines are analogs of the antitumor agent hexamethylmelamine (HMM) which do not require bioactivation to exert their antitumor effects. 2. Trimelamol (N2,N4,N6-trihydroxymethyl-N2,N4,N6-trimethylmelamine; TM) was developed as a water-soluble antitumor agent for intravenous administration. 3. Phase I and II trials of TM showed promising activity versus platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, but unfortunately further clinical development was halted due to formulation difficulties. 4. Stable analogs of TM were synthesized in an effort to overcome this shortcoming and these were evaluated in a number of in vitro and in vivo studies. 5. While the stable analogs showed good in vitro cytotoxicity in tumor cell lines, only one analog, CB7646 [bis-N-(hydroxymethyl)trimethylmelamine], showed comparable in vivo antitumor activity to that seen for TM. 6. Both TM and CB7646 were curative in human ovarian and breast cancer xenograft models, including the HX110P ovarian cancer xenograft with acquired resistance to carboplatin. 7. As CB7646 possesses favorable formulation characteristics, relating to its superior stability over that for TM, it is currently being developed for phase I clinical trial. 8. The N-(hydroxymethyl) melamines are capable of overcoming many forms of drug resistance, based on data obtained in in vitro and in vivo studies, and thus show promise as agents in the treatment of heavily pretreated, refractive tumors.

Phase II evaluation of altretamine for advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

A Phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group to determine the activity of altretamine in previously treated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Thirty-two women with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were entered. The starting dose was 260 mg/m2/day for 21 days every 4 weeks. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and 29 were evaluable for toxicity. Among the 26 evaluable patients, 21 had received prior radiotherapy and 24 had received prior chemotherapy. A median of two courses were given (range, 1-6). Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity, occurring in 17%, was the most common complication (grade 3, 13.8%; grade 4, 3.4%). Grade 3 anemia was slightly less common occurring in 13.8%. Grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in 3.4%. There were no objective responses, demonstrating that this agent is useful in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Patient compliance with prolonged oral altretamine treatment in relapsed ovarian cancer.

Using an 'intelligent' tablet bottle which, unknown to the patient, electronically records the times of opening, we have assessed the compliance of patients with prescribed oral altretamine for ovarian cancer. During the periods of compliance monitoring the physical and mental state of the patients was also monitored by means of self-assessed diary cards. 11 patients were assessed over 21 monitoring periods, each of 14 days, representing a total of 294 days. The Overall Compliance (OC), which we define as the number of bottle openings in a monitoring period as a percentage of that number expected on the assumption of perfect compliance, had a mean (SD) of 97.4 (6.9)% over the 21 periods. The OC was not related to any of the diary card measures, or to the cycle number (range 1-5) of the treatment. The high level of compliance is encouraging and is in line with our previous reports in patients with lymphoma and with small cell lung cancer.

Oral therapy for small cell lung cancer.

After a remarkable improvement of the very poor prognosis of small cell lung cancer with very simple therapy such as iv and oral cyclophosphamide the role of oral therapy has become minimal. However, since more than a decade results of combination chemotherapy are at a plateau and it is necessary to reconsider the role of simple therapy in patients without the prospect of cure. Oral therapy might be worthwhile because it is probably less effecting the quality of life of the patient and makes it unnecessary to visit the hospital frequently. All drugs available for oral use with known activity against small cell lung cancer are reviewed. The best example of the success of oral therapy is etoposide, other candidates that need to be tested in a modern way are oral cyclophosphamide and hexamethylmelamine. New concepts of prolonged chemotherapy and dose-intensity are easier evaluated by using oral drugs. The discovery of the activity of prolonged oral etoposide is an excellent example how to test a new concept in a very simple way.

Altretamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cancer chemotherapy.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) is a cytotoxic antineoplastic agent which appears to require metabolic activation. Metabolic intermediates may act as alkylating agents; however, altretamine is not directly cross-resistant with classical alkylating agents. Objective response rates to orally administered altretamine as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer were 0 to 33%, with disease stabilisation in a further 8 to 78% of patients. Response rates appear to be higher in patients who have responded to previous alkylating agent or cisplatin-based therapy. There is some evidence that addition of altretamine to platinum-based combination regimens used for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer may improve long term survival, particularly in patients with limited residual disease. Although altretamine displays some activity in small cell lung cancer, it is unlikely to have any clinical role in the management of non-ovarian cancer. Altretamine appears to be relatively well tolerated, with gastrointestinal, neurological and haematological toxicities being the main dose-limiting adverse effects. However, assessment of accurate incidence rates for these effects is complicated by the use of altretamine with cisplatin. On the basis of the emerging body of clinical evidence, altretamine appears to have a limited role in the treatment of persistent or recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, primarily in patients who are potentially platinum sensitive yet intolerant of platinum analogues. Additionally, altretamine may be added to platinum-based regimens for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. At the doses currently recommended, altretamine offers a reasonably well tolerated regimen that can be administered orally and is suitable for use on an outpatient basis.

Antitumor activity of hexamethylmelamine on human tumor xenografts serially transplanted in nude mice.

The antitumor activity of hexamethylmelamine (HMM) was evaluated using four human tumor xenografts serially transplanted in nude mice. HMM was dissolved in 0.2 ml of 1% hydroxypropyl cellulose per mouse and administered perorally daily, except on Sunday, for 4 weeks, giving an estimated maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of HMM of 75 mg/kg. The MX-1 cell line showed dose-dependent sensitivity to HMM and was completely eradicated by treatment at the MTD. The minimum effective dose of HMM against MX-1 was calculated to be 22.1 mg HMM/kg, resulting in the chemotherapeutic index of 3.4. The demethylated derivatives of HMM, pentamethylmelamine and tetramethylmelamine, were also effective against MX-1, whereas trimethylmelamine was ineffective. The effect of HMM was more marked when the drug was administered on day 1 after tumor inoculation, compared with administration during the exponential growth phase. HMM is thought to be a promising agent for the treatment of several types of human carcinoma, producing active metabolites in vivo after peroral administration.

Advances in the chemotherapy of gynecologic cancer.

By combining paclitaxel and cisplatin in treatment schedules for the initial treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, new hope has been engendered that we can further improve survival. With premedication, paclitaxel can be administered safely as a short infusion. The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is recognized as an alternative to the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel, and is now under study to define its role in future treatment programs. Other new drugs have been recognized as active in platinum-resistant disease, including docetaxel and gemcitabine. Renewed interest arose for a chronic low dose of oral etoposide in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. The results obtained with chemotherapy in cervical cancer have always been modest, and no combinations have been shown to result in improved survival rates as compared with single drugs. The novel biologic regimen, using retinoids and interferon, was confirmed to be active in locally advanced cervical cancer. In trophoblastic disease, the Charing Cross scoring system is a relevant pretreatment scoring system compared with the International Federation of Gynecology of Obstetrics staging. Careful recognition of prognostic subgroups can prevent under- or overtreatment.

Hexamethylmelamine/altretamine as second-line therapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

The purpose of this report was to review second-line hexamethylmelamine (HMM) chemotherapy of epithelial ovarian cancer to determine if HMM was active in cisplatin-resistant disease. Forty-four women with measurable disease received 100-300 mg/day HMM for 14 days, courses repeated every 4 weeks. There were 6 complete and 3 partial responses for an objective response rate of 20%. Among responding patients disease-free survival was 55% and overall survival was 88% at 3 years. Five of the 6 patients with a complete response remained disease-free at 10-117 months. Only 7/35 (20%) nonresponding patients were alive with mean follow-up of 16 months, and all had persistent cancer. Five women manifesting disease progression during cisplatin or carboplatin were subsequently treated with HMM, and none responded. Seventeen patients developing progressive cancer while receiving HMM were subsequently treated with cisplatin or carboplatin and objective responses occurred in 5 (29%). HMM was an active drug against epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin, but further study is needed to determine its activity against cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer.

[Treatment of cancers of the ovary. Phase II trial of increase of the dose of cisplatin]. / Traitement des cancers de l'ovaire. Essai phase II d'une augmentation de la dose de cisplatine.

Between March 1985 and December 1987, 34 women who had advanced adenocarcinoma of the ovary with macroscopic residual disease entered in a phase II trial of chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of a 3-month induction with monthly ifosfamide combined with 5-fluorouracil and high-dose cisplatin, and a maintenance treatment with ifosfamide, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and hexamethylmelamine in monthly cycles. At the end of the treatment patients with complete remission were evaluated by surgery. Neurotoxicity was a limiting factor, and treatment had to be prematurely withdrawn in 10 patients. The above treatment was found to be effective with a 94 percent objective response rate, a 54-month median survival and a 51-month median relapse-free survival. Because of the neurotoxicity, a shorter therapy and the use of neuroprotective agents may be envisaged.