Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 20(7): 715-21, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19489930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess retrospectively the cumulative costs for the long-term oral rehabilitation of patients with birth defects affecting the development of teeth. METHODS: Patients with birth defects who had received fixed reconstructions on teeth and/or implants > or =5 years ago were asked to participate in a comprehensive clinical, radiographic and economic evaluation. RESULTS: From the 45 patients included, 18 were cases with a cleft lip and palate, five had amelogenesis/dentinogenesis imperfecta and 22 were cases with hypodontia/oligodontia. The initial costs for the first oral rehabilitation (before the age of 20) had been covered by the Swiss Insurance for Disability. The costs for the initial rehabilitation of the 45 cases amounted to 407,584 CHF (39% for laboratory fees). Linear regression analyses for the initial treatment costs per replaced tooth revealed the formula 731 CHF+(811 CHF x units) on teeth and 3369 CHF+(1183 CHF x units) for reconstructions on implants (P<.001). Fifty-eight percent of the patients with tooth-supported reconstructions remained free from failures/complications (median observation 15.7 years). Forty-seven percent of the patients with implant-supported reconstructions remained free from failures/complications (median observation 8 years). The long-term cumulative treatment costs for implant cases, however, were not statistically significantly different compared with cases reconstructed with tooth-supported fixed reconstructions. Twenty-seven percent of the initial treatment costs were needed to cover supportive periodontal therapy as well as the treatment of technical/biological complications and failures. CONCLUSION: Insurance companies should accept to cover implant-supported reconstructions because there is no need to prepare healthy teeth, fewer tooth units need to be replaced and the cumulative long-term costs seem to be similar compared with cases restored on teeth.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis/economics , Mouth Rehabilitation/economics , Tooth Abnormalities/economics , Amelogenesis Imperfecta/economics , Anodontia/economics , Cleft Lip/economics , Cleft Palate/economics , Crowns/economics , Dental Caries/economics , Dental Implants/economics , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/economics , Dental Pulp Diseases/economics , Dental Restoration Failure , Dentinogenesis Imperfecta/economics , Denture, Partial, Fixed/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Humans , Insurance, Disability/economics , Laboratories, Dental/economics , Male , Periodontal Diseases/economics , Retrospective Studies , Root Caries/economics , Root Resorption/economics , Switzerland , Young Adult
2.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 66(4): 193-9, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18615322

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a disease primarily affecting amelogenesis, but other aberrations have been reported. The purposes of this review were: (1) to identify other anomalies associated with AI, and (2) to describe the impact of the disease and its associated conditions on the oral health-related quality of life of patients, and the economic consequences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Bibliotek.dk, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and OMIM, supplemented by a search for selected authors. Based on titles and abstracts, 137 papers were identified. RESULTS: Most articles were case reports or case series with few cases. Aberrations were reported in the eruption process, in the morphology of the crown, in the pulp-dentine organ, and in the number of teeth. Gingival conditions and oral hygiene were usually reported to be poor, and calculus was a common finding. Open bite was the most commonly reported malocclusion. A negative impact on patients' oral health-related quality of life was described, but information was scarce. No information was found on the economic impact. CONCLUSIONS: A number of aberrations associated with AI have been reported, but not sufficiently systematic to allow for a secondary analysis and synthesis of the findings. The impact on patients in terms of reduced quality of life and economic burden needs to be studied.


Subject(s)
Amelogenesis Imperfecta/complications , Cost of Illness , Quality of Life , Amelogenesis Imperfecta/economics , Amelogenesis Imperfecta/psychology , Humans , Malocclusion/complications , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Tooth Abnormalities/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL