Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 102
Filter
1.
Circulation ; 145(3): e4-e17, 2022 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882436

ABSTRACT

AIM: The executive summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions coronary artery revascularization guideline provides the top 10 items readers should know about the guideline. In the full guideline, the recommendations replace the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery guideline and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines. This summary offers a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization, as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. Structure: Recommendations from the earlier percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery guidelines have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians in caring for patients undergoing coronary revascularization. This summary includes recommendations, tables, and figures from the full guideline that relate to the top 10 take-home messages. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, supportive text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in the development of this guideline.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Coronary Artery Bypass/standards , Myocardial Revascularization/standards , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Vascular Surgical Procedures/standards , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Humans , United States , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
3.
Circulation ; 143(19): e947-e958, 2021 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840208

ABSTRACT

In 2021, the American Heart Association celebrates its 40th anniversary in advocacy. This policy statement details the arc of the organization's nonpartisan, evidence-based, equity-focused approach to advocating for public policy change, highlighting key milestones and describing the core components of the association's capacity and activity at all levels of government. This policy statement presents a vision and strategic imperative for future American Heart Association advocacy efforts to inform and influence policy changes that advance equitable, impactful societal solutions that transform and improve cardiovascular health for everyone. The American Heart Association maintains accountability by measuring and evaluating the totality of this work and its impact on equitable health outcomes. The American Heart Association will apply these lessons to constantly refine its own strategic policy focus and advocacy efforts. The association will also serve as a resource and catalyst to other organizations working to engage and educate policy makers, partners, the media, and funders about the important role and contribution of public policy change to achieve shared goals.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/organization & administration , Anniversaries and Special Events , Humans , Policy , Risk Factors , United States
4.
Circulation ; 143(18): e902-e916, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779213

ABSTRACT

This statement summarizes evidence that adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, small-for-gestational-age delivery, placental abruption, and pregnancy loss increase a woman's risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and of developing subsequent CVD (including fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and heart failure). This statement highlights the importance of recognizing APOs when CVD risk is evaluated in women, although their value in reclassifying risk may not be established. A history of APOs is a prompt for more vigorous primordial prevention of CVD risk factors and primary prevention of CVD. Adopting a heart-healthy diet and increasing physical activity among women with APOs, starting in the postpartum setting and continuing across the life span, are important lifestyle interventions to decrease CVD risk. Lactation and breastfeeding may lower a woman's later cardiometabolic risk. Black and Asian women experience a higher proportion APOs, with more severe clinical presentation and worse outcomes, than White women. More studies on APOs and CVD in non-White women are needed to better understand and address these health disparities. Future studies of aspirin, statins, and metformin may better inform our recommendations for pharmacotherapy in primary CVD prevention among women who have had an APO. Several opportunities exist for health care systems to improve transitions of care for women with APOs and to implement strategies to reduce their long-term CVD risk. One proposed strategy includes incorporation of the concept of a fourth trimester into clinical recommendations and health care policy.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/organization & administration , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , United States
6.
Clin Epigenetics ; 13(1): 42, 2021 02 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular health (CVH) has been defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) as the presence of the "Life's Simple 7" ideal lifestyle and clinical factors. CVH is known to predict longevity and freedom from cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death for women in the United States. DNA methylation markers of aging have been aggregated into a composite epigenetic age score, which is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, it is unknown whether poor CVH is associated with acceleration of aging as measured by DNA methylation markers in epigenetic age. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of racially/ethnically diverse post-menopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative cohort recruited between 1993 and 1998. Epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) was calculated using DNA methylation data on a subset of participants and the published Horvath and Hannum methods for intrinsic and extrinsic EAA. CVH was calculated using the AHA measures of CVH contributing to a 7-point score. We examined the association between CVH score and EAA using linear regression modeling adjusting for self-reported race/ethnicity and education. Among the 2,170 participants analyzed, 50% were white and mean age was 64 (7 SD) years. Higher or more favorable CVH scores were associated with lower extrinsic EAA (~ 6 months younger age per 1 point higher CVH score, p < 0.0001), and lower intrinsic EAA (3 months younger age per 1 point higher CVH score, p < 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: These cross-sectional observations suggest a possible mechanism by which ideal CVH is associated with greater longevity.


Subject(s)
Aging/genetics , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Longevity/genetics , Postmenopause/genetics , Acceleration , Aged , Aging/ethnology , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Cohort Studies , CpG Islands , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA Methylation , Epigenesis, Genetic , Female , Health Status , Humans , Middle Aged , United States , Women's Health/ethnology , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(24): e017489, 2020 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302752

ABSTRACT

Background Most women occupy multiple social roles during midlife. Perceived stress and rewards from these roles may influence health behaviors and risk factors. This study examined whether social role stress and reward were associated with the American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 in a cohort of midlife women in the United States. Methods and Results Women (n=2764) rated how stressful and rewarding they perceived their social roles during cohort follow-up (age range, 42-61 years). Body mass index, blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, physical activity, diet, and smoking were assessed multiple times. All components were collected at the fifth study visit for 1694 women (mean age, 51 years). Adjusted linear and logistic regression models were used in analyses of the number of ideal components and the odds of achieving the ideal level of each component, respectively. Longitudinal analyses using all available data from follow-up visits were conducted. At the fifth visit, more stressful and less rewarding social roles were associated with fewer ideal cardiovascular factors. Higher average stress was associated with lower odds of any component of a healthy diet and an ideal blood pressure. Higher rewards were associated with greater odds of ideal physical activity and nonsmoking. Longitudinal analyses produced consistent results; moreover, there was a significant relationship between greater stress and lower odds of ideal glucose and body mass index. Conclusions Perceived stress and rewards from social roles may influence cardiovascular risk factors in midlife women. Considering social role qualities may be important for improving health behaviors and risk factors in midlife women.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/organization & administration , Diet, Healthy/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Women's Health/trends , Adult , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Pressure/physiology , Body Mass Index , Cholesterol/blood , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise/psychology , Female , Gender Role , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Middle Aged , Reward , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/psychology , United States/epidemiology , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(17): e016701, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814479

ABSTRACT

Background Mathematical optimization of automated external defibrillator (AED) placement may improve AED accessibility and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes compared with American Heart Association (AHA) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) placement guidelines. We conducted an in silico trial (simulated prospective cohort study) comparing mathematically optimized placements with placements derived from current AHA and ERC guidelines, which recommend placement in locations where OHCAs are usually witnessed. Methods and Results We identified all public OHCAs of presumed cardiac cause from 2008 to 2016 in Copenhagen, Denmark. For the control, we computationally simulated placing 24/7-accessible AEDs at every unique, public, witnessed OHCA location at monthly intervals over the study period. The intervention consisted of an equal number of simulated AEDs placements, deployed monthly, at mathematically optimized locations, using a model that analyzed historical OHCAs before that month. For each approach, we calculated the number of OHCAs in the study period that occurred within a 100-m route distance based on Copenhagen's road network of an available AED after it was placed ("OHCA coverage"). Estimated impact on bystander defibrillation and 30-day survival was calculated by multivariate logistic regression. The control scenario involved 393 AEDs at historical, public, witnessed OHCA locations, covering 15.8% of the 653 public OHCAs from 2008 to 2016. The optimized locations provided significantly higher coverage (24.2%; P<0.001). Estimated bystander defibrillation and 30-day survival rates increased from 15.6% to 18.2% (P<0.05) and from 32.6% to 34.0% (P<0.05), respectively. As a baseline, the 1573 real AEDs in Copenhagen covered 14.4% of the OHCAs. Conclusions Mathematical optimization can significantly improve OHCA coverage and estimated clinical outcomes compared with a guidelines-based approach to AED placement.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Defibrillators/supply & distribution , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Bystander Effect , Computer Simulation , Defibrillators/trends , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Rate , United States
10.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(5): e17792, 2020 05 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32292179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based best practices are the cornerstone to guide optimal cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation care. Adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) optimizes the management of critically ill patients and increases their chances of survival after cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science and survival improvement over the last decades, only approximately 38% of children survive to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest and only 6%-20% after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether a mobile app developed as a guide to support and drive CPR providers in real time through interactive pediatric advanced life support (PALS) algorithms would increase adherence to AHA guidelines and reduce the time to initiation of critical life-saving maneuvers compared to the use of PALS pocket reference cards. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial conducted during a simulation-based pediatric cardiac arrest scenario caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). A total of 26 pediatric residents were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the elapsed time in seconds in each allocation group from the onset of pVT to the first defibrillation attempt. Secondary outcomes were time elapsed to (1) initiation of chest compression, (2) subsequent defibrillation attempts, and (3) administration of drugs, including the time intervals between defibrillation attempts and drug doses, shock doses, and the number of shocks. All outcomes were assessed for deviation from AHA guidelines. RESULTS: Mean time to the first defibrillation attempt (121.4 sec, 95% CI 105.3-137.5) was significantly reduced among residents using the app compared to those using PALS pocket cards (211.5 sec, 95% CI 162.5-260.6, P<.001). With the app, 11 out of 13 (85%) residents initiated chest compressions within 60 seconds from the onset of pVT and 12 out of 13 (92%) successfully defibrillated within 180 seconds. Time to all other defibrillation attempts was reduced with the app. Adherence to the 2018 AHA pVT algorithm improved by approximately 70% (P=.001) when using the app following all CPR sequences of action in a stepwise fashion until return of spontaneous circulation. The pVT rhythm was recognized correctly in 51 out of 52 (98%) opportunities among residents using the app compared to only 19 out of 52 (37%) among those using PALS cards (P<.001). Time to epinephrine injection was similar. Among a total of 78 opportunities, incorrect shock or drug doses occurred in 14% (11/78) of cases among those using the cards. These errors were reduced to 1% (1/78, P=.005) when using the app. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the mobile app was associated with a shorter time to first and subsequent defibrillation attempts, fewer medication and defibrillation dose errors, and improved adherence to AHA recommendations compared with the use of PALS pocket cards.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/organization & administration , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Mobile Applications/standards , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Humans , Male , United States
11.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 154(7): 254-256, abr. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-190908

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Estudiar el impacto sobre la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial (HTA) con los criterios (2017) del American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo transversal, incluyendo 370 pacientes ≥18 años, seleccionados aleatoriamente en un centro de salud, al menos con una visita y una medida de presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y diastólica (PAD) registrada los últimos 2 años. Se consideró HTA previa si constaba el diagnóstico o tenían una PAS ≥140 o PAD ≥90mmHg y como HTA criterios ACC/AHA en cualquiera de estos supuestos o constaba una PAS entre 130-139mmHg o PAD entre 80-89mmHg. RESULTADOS: La edad media fue 52,3 años (58,6% mujeres). El 41,9% tenían HTA previa, aumentando al 67,8% con los criterios ACC/AHA (p < 0,05). Recibía tramiento farmacológico el 32,2% de la población, aumentando al 38,4% con los criterios ACC/AHA (p > 0,05). Los nuevos diagnósticos (p < 0,05) eran más jóvenes (diferencia media 19,6 años) y menos obesos (el 23% vs. el 41,4%). CONCLUSIONES: Los criterios ACC/AHA supondrían un aumento del 25,9% en la prevalencia de HTA, considerando hipertensas 2 de cada 3 personas adultas


OBJECTIVE: To study the impact on the prevalence of hypertension with the criteria (2017) of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study, including 370 patients ≥18 years, randomly selected in a Health Centre, with at least one visit and a measurement of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) recorded the last 2 years. Previous hypertension was considered if the diagnosis was confirmed or they had an SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥90mmHg and as ACC/AHA AHT criteria in any of these cases or an SBP between 130-139mmHg or DBP between 80-89mmHg. RESULTS: The average age was 52.3 years (58.6% women). Forty-one point nine percent had previous hypertension, increasing to 67.8% with the ACC/AHA criteria (p <.05). Pharmacological treatment was received by 32.2% of the population, increasing to 38.4% with the ACC/AHA criteria (p>.05). The newly diagnosed patients (p <.05) were younger (mean difference 19.6 years) and less obese (23% vs.41.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA criteria would represent an increase of 25.9% in the prevalence of hypertension, considering 2 out of 3 adults hypertensive


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Cardiology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Blood Pressure , Logistic Models
12.
J Hypertens ; 38(7): 1271-1277, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195818

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guideline for high blood pressure (BP) in adults redefined hypertension as SBP at least 130 mmHg or DBP at least 80 mmHg. However, the optimal BP for different BMI population to reduce stroke incidence is uncertain. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was designed by four examinations: baseline (2004-2006), 2008, 2010 and 2017 follow-up. The study group composed of 36 352 individuals, to determine the ideal BP range to reduce stroke incidence of two BMI level, adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to establish the associations between SBP/DBP and the risk of stroke incident. Then, the restricted cubic spline regression was applied to find the ideal range of SBP/DBP values for two kinds of BMI categories definitions. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 12.5 years, 2548 (7.0%) nonstroke individuals at baseline developed incident stroke. After fully adjusting confounding factors, SBP (per 20 mmHg increase) and DBP (per 10 mmHg increase) are independently associated with the risk of stroke incidence [SBP, hazard ratio = 1.277, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.217-1.340, P < 0.001; DBP, hazard ratio = 1.138, 95% CI, 1.090-1.189, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that the ideal BP for a population with BMI less than 24 kg/m was less than 130/80 mmHg, whereas the ideal BP for BMI at least 24 kg/m was less than 120/80 mmHg. The sensitivity analyses between BMI less than 25 kg/m and BMI at least 25 kg/m showed similar findings. This finding provides more accurate primary prevention strategies based on various BMI populations.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Hypertension/epidemiology , Stroke/epidemiology , Adult , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Cardiology/standards , China/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk , Stroke/physiopathology , United States
17.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 21(8): 1212-1220, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267666

ABSTRACT

The 2017 guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of high blood pressure in adults were published by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. The impact on clinical outcomes and costs needs to be estimated prior to adopting these guidelines in China. Data from a nationally representative sample in China were analyzed. The prevalence and treatment were calculated based on the criteria of the 2017 guidelines and 2018 Chinese guidelines among participants aged ≥35 years old. Direct medical costs, as well as the averted disability adjusted of life years and cost saving from cardiovascular disease events prevented by controlling hypertension, were also estimated. The prevalence and treatment rate of hypertension were 32.0% and 43.4% according to the 2018 Chinese guidelines. Based on the 2017 guidelines, another 24.5% of the adult population (estimated 168.1 million) would be classified as having hypertension; of whom, about 32.1 million would need to be pharmaceutically treated to reach the current treatment rate of 43.4%. As a result, an estimated additional 42.7 billion US dollars  of the direct medical cost would be required for lifetime therapy. By preventing cardiovascular events, the new guidelines would reduce lifetime costs by 3.77 billion US dollars, while preventing 1.41 million disability adjusted of life years lost. Application of the 2017 guidelines in China will substantially increase the prevalence of hypertension and produce a large increase in therapy costs, although it would prevent cardiovascular disease events and save disability adjusted of life years.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/economics , Cardiology/economics , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Hypertension/diagnosis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiology/organization & administration , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , China/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Hypertension/classification , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States/epidemiology
18.
Ann Med ; 51(5-6): 306-313, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264909

ABSTRACT

Background: The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prompted the American Heart Association to develop a cardiovascular health (CVH) metric as a measure to assess the cardiovascular status of the population. We aimed to assess the association between CVH scores and the risk of CVD mortality among a middle-aged Finnish population. Methods: We employed the prospective population-based Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease cohort study comprising of middle-aged men (42-60 years). CVH scores were computed among 2607 participants at baseline and categorized as optimum (0-4), average (5-9), or inadequate (10-14) CVH. Multivariate cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CVH score for cardiovascular mortality. Results: During a median follow-up period of 25.8 years, 609 CVD mortality cases were recorded. The risk of CVD mortality increased gradually with increasing CVH score across the range 3-14 (p-value for non-linearity =.77). Men with optimum CVH score had HR (95% CI) for CVD mortality of 0.30 (CI 0.21 - 0.42, p < .0001) compared to those with inadequate CVH score after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: CVH score was strongly and continuously associated with the risk of CVD mortality among middle-aged Finnish population and this was independent of other conventional risk factors. Key messages Achieving optimum cardiovascular health score reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality. Adopting the American Heart Association's cardiovascular health metrics is a welcome approach for public health awareness and monitoring of cardiovascular health among Scandinavian population.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Public Health/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Adult , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Awareness , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Pressure/physiology , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cohort Studies , Exercise/physiology , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Public Health/trends , Risk Factors , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , United States
19.
BMJ Open Qual ; 8(2): e000560, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31206062

ABSTRACT

For hospitals located in the United States, appropriate use of cardiac telemetry monitoring can be achieved resulting in cost savings to healthcare systems. Our institution has a limited number of telemetry beds, increasing the need for appropriate use of telemetry monitoring to minimise delays in patient care, reduce alarm fatigue, and decrease interruptions in patient care. This quality improvement project was conducted in a single academic medical centre in Kansas City, Kansas. The aim of the project was to reduce inappropriate cardiac telemetry monitoring on intermediate care units. Using the 2004 American Heart Association guidelines to guide appropriate telemetry utilisation, this project team sought to investigate the effects of two distinct interventions to reduce inappropriate telemetry monitoring, huddle intervention and mandatory order entry. Telemetry utilisation was followed prospectively for 2 years. During our initial intervention, we achieved a sharp decline in the number of patients on telemetry monitoring. However, over time the efficacy of the huddle intervention subsided, resulting in a need for a more sustained approach. By requiring physicians to input indication for telemetry monitoring, the second intervention increased adherence to practice guidelines and sustained reductions in inappropriate telemetry use.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Telemetry/standards , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Humans , Kansas , Quality Improvement , Telemetry/methods , Telemetry/statistics & numerical data , United States
20.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 21(6): 758-765, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131983

ABSTRACT

In 2017, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) updated the Guideline of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Management and Management of High Blood Pressure (HBP) in Adults. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the potential impact of the 2017ACC/AHA HBP guideline on hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control rates. The data were collected from Physical Examination Center of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2012 to December 2017 (N = 66 977), including demographic information and risk factors of hypertension. The hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control rates of people were evaluated according to the new guideline. Additionally, the factors related to hypertension prevalence were also assessed. According to previous HBP guideline, hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control rate were 30.54%, 44.33%, and 13.04%, respectively. However, when the 2017 ACC/AHA HBP guideline was introduced, the population with hypertension increased from 20 453 to 34 460, the hypertension prevalence rate increased from 30.54% to 51.45%, the awareness rate decreased from 44.33% to 26.31%, and the control rate declined from 13.04% to 2.72%. The most newly diagnosed hypertension patients were from the low-risk population with young age and without the above histories. The 2017ACC/AHA HBP guideline indicated that high hypertension prevalence rate still existed with a substantial increase, while the awareness and control rates were relatively lowered.


Subject(s)
Awareness/ethics , Comorbidity/trends , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Adult , American Heart Association/organization & administration , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Body Mass Index , Cardiology/organization & administration , Case-Control Studies , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/complications , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...