Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 434
Filter
1.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 27(5): e26242, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695517

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Men who have sex with men (MSM), especially those living with HIV, are at an increased risk of anal cancer. The prevalence and incidence of its precursor, anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), among MSM who started antiretroviral therapy during acute HIV acquisition are yet to be explored. METHODS: Participants in an acute HIV acquisition cohort in Bangkok, Thailand, who agreed to take part in this study, were enrolled. All participants were diagnosed and started antiretroviral therapy during acute HIV acquisition. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping and high-resolution anoscopy, followed by anal biopsy as indicated, were done at baseline and 6-monthly visits. RESULTS: A total of 89 MSM and four transgender women were included in the analyses. Median age at enrolment was 26 years. Baseline prevalence of histologic anal HSIL was 11.8%. With a total of 147.0 person-years of follow-up, the incidence of initial histologic anal HSIL was 19.7 per 100 person-years. Factors associated with incident anal HSIL were anal HPV 16 (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 4.33, 95% CI 1.03-18.18), anal HPV 18/45 (aHR 6.82, 95% CI 1.57-29.51), other anal high-risk HPV (aHR 4.23, 95% CI 1.27-14.14), syphilis infection (aHR 4.67, 95% CI 1.10-19.90) and CD4 count <350 cells/mm3 (aHR 3.09, 95% CI 1.28-7.48). CONCLUSIONS: With antiretroviral therapy initiation during acute HIV acquisition, we found the prevalence of anal HSIL among cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men to be similar to those without HIV. Subsequent anal HSIL incidence, although lower than that of those with chronic HIV acquisition, was still higher than that of those without HIV. Screening for and management of anal HSIL should be a crucial part of long-term HIV care for all MSM.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Homosexuality, Male , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions , Transgender Persons , Humans , Thailand/epidemiology , Male , Adult , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , Prevalence , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Female , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/epidemiology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/pathology , Young Adult , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Biopsy , Genotype , Anal Canal/pathology , Anal Canal/virology
2.
Sex Health ; 212024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683939

ABSTRACT

Background Anal cancer disproportionately affects sexual and gender minority individuals living with HIV. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is an in-clinic procedure to detect precancerous anal lesions and cancer, yet prospective data on factors associated with HRA attendance are lacking. We examined whether anal HPV sampling at home versus in a clinic impacts HRA uptake and assessed HRA acceptability. Methods Sexual and gender minority individuals were randomised to home-based self-sampling or clinical sampling. All were asked to attend in-clinic HRA 1year later. We regressed HRA attendance on study arm using multivariable Poisson regression and assessed HRA acceptability using χ 2 tests. Results A total of 62.8% of 196 participants who engaged in screening attended HRA. Although not significant (P =0.13), a higher proportion of participants who engaged in clinic-based screening attended HRA (68.5%) compared to home-based participants (57.9%). Overall, HRA uptake was higher among participants with anal cytology history (aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.82), and lower among participants preferring a versatile anal sex position versus insertive (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.91), but did not differ by race or HIV serostatus. In the clinic arm, persons living with HIV had lower HRA attendance (42.9%) versus HIV-negative participants (73.3%) (P =0.02) and Black non-Hispanic participants had lower HRA attendance (41.7%) than White non-Hispanic participants (73.1%), (P =0.04). No differences in attendance by race or HIV status were observed in the home arm. Conclusions HRA uptake differed significantly by race and HIV status in the clinic arm but not the home arm.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Male , Anus Neoplasms/prevention & control , Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Female , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Middle Aged , Specimen Handling/methods , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Anal Canal/virology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Proctoscopy , Early Detection of Cancer , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Self Care , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
3.
Sex Transm Infect ; 100(4): 252-255, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641362

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of a self-administered point-of-care test (POCT) for anal human papillomavirus (HPV) screening with laboratory gold-standard test in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users and evaluated its feasibility. METHODS: We enrolled PrEP users from a local community-based PrEP service. Each participant self-collected an anal swab to test anal HPV with a PCR POCT capable of detecting 14 high-risk HPV genotypes. Anonymous questionnaires on self-sampling feasibility were completed. Participants were then referred to local clinics to undergo standard viral genotyping. Concordance between POCT and gold-standard test was measured with absolute agreement and Cohen's kappa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate POCT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: 179 subjects got a valid POCT result, most of them men (98.3%) and men who have sex with men (90.4%). 68.2% tested positive for at least one high-risk HPV genotype on POCT. 150 feasibility questionnaires were collected: 92.7% of compilers found the self-swab easy to perform. For 178 subjects, a gold-standard test valid result was also available: 77% tested positive for at least one high-risk HPV genotype. The median time elapsed between the two tests was 9.8 months, due to COVID-19-related service interruptions. Agreement between POCT and gold-standard test was 79.3% (Cohen's kappa=0.49). POCT showed a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 73.8%, a PPV of 91.0% and an NPV of 54.4%. CONCLUSIONS: POCT showed a moderate agreement with gold-standard test and a discrete sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that it could be a useful and feasible additional tool for HPV screening, especially in low-resource and community-based settings.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Point-of-Care Testing , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Male , Adult , Female , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Anal Canal/virology , Feasibility Studies , Middle Aged , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Young Adult , Self-Testing
4.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 77(5)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688871

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of PCR-based diagnostic assays can be impacted by the quality of DNA template, and anal samples can be particularly problematic due to the presence of faecal contaminants. Here, we compared the Quick-DNA Viral Kit (Zymo, Zymo Research, CA) and MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit (MP96, Roche) for use of the Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay (Anyplex28, Seegene) with anal samples. A total of 94 anal samples extracted using the MP96 and Zymo kits were tested via the Anyplex28, which detects high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV, Panel A) and low-risk (LR-HPV, Panel B) HPV types. Testing the HR-HPV types (Panel A), 86 (91.5%) MP96 and 84 (89.4%) Zymo samples were deemed assessable. Overall agreement between the two methods was 87/94 (92.6%, 95% CI: 85.3-97.0) with the Kappa value of 0.678 (0.5-0.9). Of the 87 assessable samples, 50 (57.5%) were concordant, 34 (39.1%) partially concordant, and 10 (11.5%)discordant. In conclusion, the Anyplex28 produces comparable HPV genotyping results when using DNA extracts from either of these two methods.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/classification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Anal Canal/virology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
5.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 7(1): 61, 2022 02 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35217639

ABSTRACT

Variants are globally emerging very quickly following pandemic prototypic SARS-CoV-2. To evaluate the cross-protection of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against its variants, we vaccinated rhesus monkeys with three doses of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine, followed by challenging with emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs). These vaccinated animals produced neutralizing antibodies against Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, although there were certain declinations of geometric mean titer (GMT) as compared with prototypic SARS-CoV-2. Of note, in vivo this prototypic vaccine not only reduced the viral loads in nasal, throat and anal swabs, pulmonary tissues, but also improved the pathological changes in the lung infected by variants of Alpha, Beta, and Delta. In summary, the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine in this study protected against VOCs to certain extension, which is of great significance for prevention and control of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Protection , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Anal Canal/virology , Animals , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/virology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Lung/virology , Macaca mulatta , Male , Nasal Cavity/virology , Pharynx/virology , SARS-CoV-2/growth & development , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/virology , Viral Load/drug effects
6.
Forensic Sci Int ; 331: 111168, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999365

ABSTRACT

Rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in dead bodies is essential to prevent infection among those working with dead bodies. This study focused on the Smart Amplification (SmartAmp) method, which has a short examination time (approximately an hour), is simple to perform, and demonstrates high specificity and sensitivity. This method has already been used for clinical specimens; however, its effectiveness in dead bodies has not been reported. This study examined the SmartAmp method using 11 autopsies or postmortem needle biopsies performed from January to May, 2021 (of these, five cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and six cases tested negative). Swab samples were collected from the nasopharynx, oropharynx, or anus and the SmartAmp and qRT-PCR results were compared. For the nasopharynx and oropharynx samples, the same results were obtained for both methods in all cases; however, for the anal swabs, there was one case that was positive according to qRT-PCR but negative according to the SmartAmp method. The SmartAmp method may therefore be less sensitive than qRT-PCR and results may differ in specimens with a low viral load, such as anal swabs. However, in the nasopharynx and oropharynx specimens, which are normally used for testing, the results were the same using each method, suggesting that the SmartAmp method is useful in dead bodies. In the future, the SmartAmp method may be applied not only during autopsies, but also in various situations where dead bodies are handled.


Subject(s)
Cadaver , SARS-CoV-2 , Anal Canal/virology , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Humans , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
7.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 184, 2022 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996988

ABSTRACT

HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) display the highest prevalence of anal infection by high-risk Human Papillomaviruses (hrHPVs) and incidence of anal carcinoma. Anal specimens were genotyped by the Linear Array. Incidence and clearance of anal infection by hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, low-risk HPVs, and four individual types (6,11,16,18) were estimated using a two-state Markov model. Determinants for incidence and clearance were assessed by logistic regression. Overall, 204 individuals were included (median age 42 years, IQR = 34-49). For hrHPVs, incidence and clearance rates were 36.1 × 1000 person-months (p-m) (95% CI 23.3-56.5) and 15.6 × 1000 p-m (95% CI 10.7-23.3), respectively. HPV16 showed a higher incidence than HPV18 (10.2 vs. 7.2 × 1000 p-m). Its clearance was more than twofold lower than that of HPV18 (30.1 vs. 78.2 × 1000 p-m). MSM receiving cART displayed a 68% to 88% decrease in risk of acquiring hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, HPV16, and HPV18 (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.67; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78; aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.90; aHR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, respectively) than patients not treated. A nadir CD4 + count < 200 cells/mm3 significantly reduced the clearance of hrHPVs other than HPV16 (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90). cART use reduces the risk of acquiring anal infection by hrHPVs.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/virology , Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Coinfection , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anus Diseases/diagnosis , Anus Diseases/prevention & control , Anus Diseases/virology , Drug Therapy, Combination , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prognosis , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Rome/epidemiology , Time Factors
8.
Sex Transm Infect ; 98(2): 101-107, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33727339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: High-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) causes anal cancer, which disproportionately affects gay and bisexual men (GBM). We examined sexual behaviours associated with incident anal HRHPV in an observational cohort study of GBM in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: GBM aged 35 years and above were enrolled in the Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer. Detailed information on sexual practices in the last 6 months, including receptive anal intercourse (RAI) and non-intercourse receptive anal practices, was collected. Anal human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was performed at the baseline and three annual follow-up visits. Risk factors for incident HRHPV were determined by Cox regression using the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld method. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2015, 617 men were recruited and 525 who had valid HPV results at baseline and at least one follow-up visit were included in the analysis. The median age was 49 years (IQR 43-56) and 188 (35.8%) were HIV-positive. On univariable analysis, incident anal HRHPV was associated with being HIV-positive (p<0.001), having a higher number of recent RAI partners regardless of condom use (p<0.001 for both), preference for the receptive position during anal intercourse (p=0.014) and other non-intercourse receptive anal sexual practices, including rimming, fingering and receptive use of sex toys (p<0.05 for all). In multivariable analyses, being HIV-positive (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.85, p=0.009) and reporting condom-protected RAI with a higher number of sexual partners (p<0.001) remained significantly associated with incident HRHPV. When stratified by recent RAI, non-intercourse receptive anal practices were not associated with incident HRHPV in men who reported no recent RAI. CONCLUSION: GBM living with HIV and those who reported RAI were at increased of incident anal HRHPV. Given the substantial risk of anal cancer and the difficulty in mitigating the risk of acquiring anal HRHPV, HPV vaccination should be considered among sexually active older GBM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR365383.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/virology , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/etiology , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/pathogenicity , Anus Neoplasms/prevention & control , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Risk Factors
9.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 11(1): 21-30, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625384

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although anal cancer is more common in women, most of the studies on the role of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection in anal squamous lesions have focused on high-risk male patients. Therefore, we compared the genotype profile and clinicopathologic correlation of hrHPV infection in human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) men and women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2254 HIV+ patients (1931 men and 323 women) who had undergone anal Papanicolaou tests at our institution; 1189 of them also had follow-up biopsy data available. HPV genotyping was performed using the Roche Cobas system and correlated with the cytologic and histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared with the HIV+ men, the HIV+ women had a significantly lower rate of hrHPV infection (67.5% versus 78.5%; P < 0.0001) but a significantly higher rate of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) on anal Papanicolaou tests (4.6% versus 2.5%; P < 0.05). Other high-risk HPV (ohrHPV), as a group, is much more common than HPV16 or HPV18 in both genders. HIV+ women had significantly lower HPV16 and ohrHPV infection rates than did HIV+ men. However, the HPV18 infection rates were similar between HIV+ women and HIV+ men. For both genders, the rates of HSILs or high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN2-3) were significantly increased when coinfection of ohrHPV with either HPV16 or HPV18 was present. CONCLUSIONS: Although both HIV+ men and HIV+ women have an increased risk of hrHPV infection, HIV+ women have different hrHPV genotype profiles and higher rates of high-grade lesions. Coinfection with different genotypes of hrHPV can significantly increase the risk of HSILs or AIN2-3 in both genders and could requires vigilant clinical and laboratory follow-up.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Anal Canal/virology , Coinfection/virology , HIV Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Adult , Anal Canal/cytology , Anal Canal/pathology , Biopsy , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genotyping Techniques , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
10.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 10(1): 2090-2097, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34689717

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread and threatens public health worldwide. The recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in patients after discharge from hospital signals a risk of transmission from such patients to the community and challenges the current discharge criteria of COVID-19 patients. A wide range of clinical specimens has been used to detect SARS-CoV-2. However, to date, a consensus has not been reached regarding the most appropriate specimens to use for viral RNA detection in assessing COVID-19 patients for discharge. An anal swab sample was proposed as the standard because of prolonged viral detection. In this retrospective longitudinal study of viral RNA detection in 60 confirmed COVID-19 patients, we used saliva, oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab (O/N swab) and anal swab procedures from admission to discharge. The conversion times of saliva and anal swab were longer than that of O/N swab. The conversion time of hyper sensitive-CRP was the shortest and correlated with that of CT scanning and viral detection. Some patients were found to be RNA-positive in saliva while RNA-negative in anal swab while the reverse was true in some other patients, which indicated that false negatives were inevitable if only the anal swab is used for evaluating suitability for discharge. These results indicated that double-checking for viral RNA using multiple and diverse specimens was essential, and saliva could be a candidate to supplement anal swabs to reduce false-negative results and facilitate pandemic control.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Saliva/virology , Adult , Anal Canal/virology , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , Patient Discharge , RNA, Viral/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19257, 2021 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34584174

ABSTRACT

Anal high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection is widely considered a cause of anal cancer. However, epidemiological data are quite limited in Japan. This study investigated anal HPV infections and cytological abnormalities among MSM with or without HIV infection. Anal swabs were obtained, and cytological results were examined. Hybrid capture-based methodology was used for hr-HPV genotyping. The exclusion criterion was a history of vaccination against HPV. 644 subjects participated, and the overall prevalence of hr-HPV was 59.7% (95% CI 54.7-62.3), HIV-infected had higher prevalence than HIV-uninfected (68.9% vs 40.6%) p < .001. Among hr-HPV-infected participants, 82.8% (312/377) were infected with at least one of 9 valent vaccine-covered hr-HPV genotypes. From regression analysis, detection of abnormal cytology correlated positively with HIV infection (OR 2.17 [95% CI 1.51-3.13]), number of hr-HPV genotypes infected (OR 1.83 [1.59-2.10]), history of STI (OR 1.58 [1.14-2.22]) and No. of lifetime sexual partners (OR 1.56 [1.10-2.21]), albeit multivariate analysis identified the number of detected hr-HPV genotypes (adjusted OR 1.78 [1.54-2.06]) as the independent risk factor for abnormal cytology. High rates of anal hr-HPV infection, especially 9-valent HPV vaccine-preventable hr-HPV were detected among our MSM participants in Japan. HPV vaccination should also be encouraged for MSM in Japan.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Anal Canal/pathology , Anal Canal/virology , Anus Diseases/diagnosis , Anus Diseases/pathology , Anus Diseases/virology , Anus Neoplasms/complications , Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Anus Neoplasms/virology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data
12.
Lancet HIV ; 8(9): e531-e543, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robust age-specific estimates of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in men can inform anal cancer prevention efforts. We aimed to evaluate the age-specific prevalence of anal HPV, HSIL, and their combination, in men, stratified by HIV status and sexuality. METHODS: We did a systematic review for studies on anal HPV infection in men and a pooled analysis of individual-level data from eligible studies across four groups: HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV-negative MSM, HIV-positive men who have sex with women (MSW), and HIV-negative MSW. Studies were required to inform on type-specific HPV infection (at least HPV16), detected by use of a PCR-based test from anal swabs, HIV status, sexuality (MSM, including those who have sex with men only or also with women, or MSW), and age. Authors of eligible studies with a sample size of 200 participants or more were invited to share deidentified individual-level data on the above four variables. Authors of studies including 40 or more HIV-positive MSW or 40 or more men from Africa (irrespective of HIV status and sexuality) were also invited to share these data. Pooled estimates of anal high-risk HPV (HR-HPV, including HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68), and HSIL or worse (HSIL+), were compared by use of adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) from generalised linear models. FINDINGS: The systematic review identified 93 eligible studies, of which 64 contributed data on 29 900 men to the pooled analysis. Among HIV-negative MSW anal HPV16 prevalence was 1·8% (91 of 5190) and HR-HPV prevalence was 6·9% (345 of 5003); among HIV-positive MSW the prevalences were 8·7% (59 of 682) and 26·9% (179 of 666); among HIV-negative MSM they were 13·7% (1455 of 10 617) and 41·2% (3798 of 9215), and among HIV-positive MSM 28·5% (3819 of 13 411) and 74·3% (8765 of 11 803). In HIV-positive MSM, HPV16 prevalence was 5·6% (two of 36) among those age 15-18 years and 28·8% (141 of 490) among those age 23-24 years (ptrend=0·0091); prevalence was 31·7% (1057 of 3337) among those age 25-34 years and 22·8% (451 of 1979) among those age 55 and older (ptrend<0·0001). HPV16 prevalence in HIV-negative MSM was 6·7% (15 of 223) among those age 15-18 and 13·9% (166 of 1192) among those age 23-24 years (ptrend=0·0076); the prevalence plateaued thereafter (ptrend=0·72). Similar age-specific patterns were observed for HR-HPV. No significant differences for HPV16 or HR-HPV were found by age for either HIV-positive or HIV-negative MSW. HSIL+ detection ranged from 7·5% (12 of 160) to 54·5% (61 of 112) in HIV-positive MSM; after adjustment for heterogeneity, HIV was a significant predictor of HSIL+ (aPR 1·54, 95% CI 1·36-1·73), HPV16-positive HSIL+ (1·66, 1·36-2·03), and HSIL+ in HPV16-positive MSM (1·19, 1·04-1·37). Among HPV16-positive MSM, HSIL+ prevalence increased with age. INTERPRETATION: High anal HPV prevalence among young HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM highlights the benefits of gender-neutral HPV vaccination before sexual activity over catch-up vaccination. HIV-positive MSM are a priority for anal cancer screening research and initiatives targeting HPV16-positive HSIL+. FUNDING: International Agency for Research on Cancer.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/epidemiology , Age Factors , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sexuality/statistics & numerical data , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/virology
13.
J Virol ; 95(19): e0070721, 2021 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287053

ABSTRACT

Understanding the earliest events of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sexual transmission is critical to developing and optimizing HIV prevention strategies. To gain insights into the earliest steps of HIV rectal transmission, including cellular targets, rhesus macaques were intrarectally challenged with a single-round simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-based dual reporter that expresses luciferase and near-infrared fluorescent protein 670 (iRFP670) upon productive transduction. The vector was pseudotyped with the HIV-1 envelope JRFL. Regions of tissue containing foci of luminescent transduced cells were identified macroscopically using an in vivo imaging system, and individual transduced cells expressing fluorescent protein were identified and phenotyped microscopically. This system revealed that anal and rectal tissues are both susceptible to transduction 48 h after the rectal challenge. Detailed phenotypic analysis revealed that, on average, 62% of transduced cells are CCR6-positive (CCR6+) T cells-the vast majority of which express RORγT, a Th17 lineage-specific transcription factor. The second most common target cells were immature dendritic cells at 20%. These two cell types were transduced at rates that are four to five times higher than their relative abundances indicate. Our work demonstrates that Th17 T and immature dendritic cells are preferential initial targets of HIV/SIV rectal transmission. IMPORTANCE Men and women who participate in unprotected receptive anal intercourse are at high risk of acquiring HIV. While in vitro data have developed a framework for understanding HIV cell tropism, the initial target cells in the rectal mucosa have not been identified. In this study, we identify these early host cells by using an innovative rhesus macaque rectal challenge model and methodology, which we previously developed. Thus, by shedding light on these early HIV/SIV transmission events, this study provides a specific cellular target for future prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Dendritic Cells/virology , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/physiology , Rectum/virology , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/physiology , Th17 Cells/virology , Anal Canal/virology , Animals , Female , Intestinal Mucosa/virology , Macaca mulatta , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , Virus Replication
14.
mBio ; 12(4): e0161121, 2021 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281391

ABSTRACT

Up to 95% of all anal cancers are associated with infection by human papillomavirus (HPV); however, no established preclinical model exists for high-grade anal disease and cancer mediated by a natural papillomavirus infection. To establish an infection-mediated model, we infected both immunocompromised NSG and immunocompetent FVB/NJ mice with the recently discovered murine papillomavirus MmuPV1, with and without the additional cofactors of UV B radiation (UVB) and/or the chemical carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA). Infections were tracked via lavages and swabs for MmuPV1 DNA, and pathology was assessed at the endpoint. Tissues were analyzed for biomarkers of viral infection and papillomavirus-mediated disease, and the localization of viral infection was investigated using biomarkers to characterize the anal microanatomical zones. IMPORTANCE We show, for the first time, that MmuPV1 infection is sufficient to efficiently mediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in the anal tract of mice using the NSG immunocompromised strain and that MmuPV1, in combination with the chemical carcinogen DMBA, has carcinogenic potential. We further show that MmuPV1 is able to persist for up to 6 months in the anal tract of FVB/NJ mice irradiated with UVB and contributes to high-grade disease and cancer in an immunocompetent strain. We demonstrate that MmuPV1 preferentially localizes to the anal transition zone and that this localization is not an artifact of infection methodology. This study presents a valuable new preclinical model for studying papillomavirus-mediated anal disease driven by a natural infection.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/pathology , Anal Canal/virology , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Disease Models, Animal , Mice , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Animals , Anthracenes/administration & dosage , Anus Neoplasms/chemically induced , Female , Male , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/pathology , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/virology , Ultraviolet Rays
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011623

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study will test the performance of the anal swab PCR test when compared with the nasopharyngeal swab PCR test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19. DESIGN: An observational descriptive study which included hospitalised suspected, or probable cases of hopitalised COVID-19 patients, conducted in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital, Ciputra Hospital, Mitra Keluarga Depok Hospital and Mitra Keluarga Kelapa Gading Hospital, Indonesia. Epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiology data were obtained. Nasopharyngeal and anal swabs specimens were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. RESULTS: We analysed 136 subjects as part of this study. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 manifesation in this study was typical of hospitalised patients, with 25% classified as mild cases, 14.7% in severe condition and 12.5% of subjects classified as having acute respiratory distress syndrome. When compared with nasopharyngeal swab as the standard specimen for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, the sensitivity and specificity of the anal swab was 36.7% and 93.8%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value were 97.8% and 16.5 %, respectively. The performance of the anal swab remained similar when only the subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (n=92, 67.6%) was analysed (sensitivity 40% and specificity 91.7%). Out of all the subjects included in analysis, 67.6% had gastrointestinal symptoms. Similarly, 73.3% of patients in the anal swab-positive group had gastrointestinal symptoms. The two most common gastrointestinal symptoms in the subjects' population were nausea and anorexia. CONCLUSION: Anal swab specimen has low sensitivity (36.7%) but high specificity (93.8%) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen by RT-PCR. Only one additional positive result was found by anal swab among the nasopharyngeal swab-negative group. Anal swab may not be needed as an additional test at the beginning of a patient's diagnostic investigation and nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR remains as the standard diagnostic test for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/virology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Hospitalization , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Viruses ; 13(5)2021 04 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33922632

ABSTRACT

Papillomaviruses (PVs) are considered highly species-specific with cospeciation as the main driving force in their evolution. However, a recent increase in the available PV genome sequences has revealed inconsistencies in virus-host phylogenies, which could be explained by adaptive radiation, recombination, host-switching events and a broad PV host range. Unfortunately, with a relatively low number of animal PVs characterized, understanding these incongruities remains elusive. To improve knowledge of biology and the spread of animal PV, we collected 60 swabs of the anogenital and head and neck regions from a healthy colony of 30 Roborovski hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii) and detected PVs in 44/60 (73.3%) hamster samples. This is the first report of PV infection in Roborovski hamsters. Moreover, Phodopus sungorus papillomavirus type 1 (PsuPV1), previously characterized in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus), was the only PV detected in Roborovski hamsters. In addition, after a detailed literature search, review and summary of published evidence and construction of a tanglegram linking the cladograms of PVs and their hosts, our findings were discussed in the context of available knowledge on PVs described in at least two different host species.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Phodopus/virology , Phylogeny , Anal Canal/virology , Animals , Animals, Wild/virology , Evolution, Molecular , Female , Genitalia/virology , Host Specificity , Male , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission
17.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250426, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIM: Women with HIV/HPV coinfection and cervical lesions are at increased risk of developing HPV related anal cancer. Self-collection of anal swabs may facilitate HPV molecular testing in anal cancer screening, especially in high-risk groups, and yet it is not adequately studied. We evaluated level of agreement between self-collected anal swabs (SCAS) and clinician-collected anal swabs (CCAS) when used for HPV genotyping. We also described the anal HPV genotype distribution and HIV/HPV coinfection. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional study with participants from a visual-inspection-with-acetic-acid and cervicography (VIAC) clinic, in Harare, Zimbabwe. In a clinic setting, the women aged ≥18 years provided anal swabs in duplicate; first CCAS and then SCAS immediately after. HPV detection and genotyping were performed using next generation amplicon sequencing of a 450bp region of the HPV L1 gene. Level of agreement of HPV genotypes between CCAS and SCAS was calculated using the kappa statistic. McNemar tests were used to evaluate agreement in the proportion of genotypes detected by either method. RESULTS: Three-hundred women provided 600 samples for HPV genotyping. HPV genotypes were detected in 25% of SCAS and in 22% of CCAS. The most common genotypes with CCAS were HPV52, HPV62 and HPV70 and with SCAS were HPV62, HPV44, HPV52, HPV53 and HPV68. Total HPV genotypes detected in CCAS were more than those detected in SCAS, 32 versus 27. The agreement of HPV genotypes between the two methods was 0.55 in kappa value (k). The test of proportions using McNemar gave a Chi-square value of 0.75 (p = 0.39). Multiple HPV infections were detected in 28/75 and 29/67 women for CCAS and SCAS respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SCAS and CCAS anal swabs showed moderate agreement, with no statistically significant difference in the proportion of genotypes detected by either methods. Although the differences between the two methods were not statistically significant, CCAS detected more HPV genotypes than SCAS and more HPV infections were detected in SCAS than in CCAS. Our data suggest that self-collected anal swabs can be used as an alternative to clinician-collected anal swabs for HPV genotyping.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Genotype , HIV , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Specimen Handling/methods , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal/virology , Coinfection/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Young Adult , Zimbabwe/epidemiology
18.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 24(3): e25691, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773075

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As the leading sexually transmitted infection worldwide, human papillomavirus (HPV) may disproportionately affect transwomen. We aimed to estimate anal HPV prevalence, especially focusing on high-risk (hr)-HPV types and evaluate their associated factors among transwomen living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: Transwomen enrolled in a respondent-driven sampling (RDS)-based survey conducted between August 2015 and January 2016 self-collected anal samples, which were promptly stored at minus 80°C. After DNA extraction, HPV detection and genotyping were performed using the PapilloCheck test. We estimated HPV prevalences and evaluated the correlates of anal hr-HPV infection using a regression logistic model. RESULTS: Out of 345 transwomen, 272 (78.8%) were included in this analysis (122 [44.9%] HIV-positive). No participant had ever received HPV vaccination. Among participants enrolled, 212 (77.9%) were positive for any anal HPV type and 165 (60.7%) for hr-HPV. Most common hr-HPV were as follows: HPV16 (17.6%), HPV68 (14.7%), HPV39 (14.3%), HPV56 (12.5%), HPV51 (11.4%) and HPV52 (11.0%). HIV-positive transwomen had three times the odds of having an hr-HPV compared to HIV-negative transwomen. Participants who had a current rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection had 3.7 times the odds of being coinfected with hr-HPV. Among HIV-positive transwomen, neither antiretroviral therapy use, undetectable viral load, current and nadir CD4 counts were associated with anal hr-HPV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Brazilian transwomen in our study exhibit some of the highest population-specific rates of HPV and hr-HPV. There is an urgent need to elucidate the burden of HPV infection, prevalence of HPV-related diseases and access to and uptake of HPV vaccination among transwomen, especially from low- and middle-income settings.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Anal Canal/virology , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Prevalence , Risk Factors
19.
Virology ; 558: 134-144, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33770686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Human Papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) variants in men and the association with tumor development has not been fully investigated. We estimated the prevalence of genital, anal, and oral HPV-16 infections in men through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Seven databases were searched and included studies that identified HPV-16 positive males, HPV-16 variants (lineages/sublineages), and indicated the sample's anatomical origin. This protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020178013). RESULTS: The database searches yielded 14 studies including 445 HPV-16 positive samples classified as lineage A (n = 390), lineage D (n = 43), lineage B (n = 10), and lineage C (n = 2) variants. Lineage A variants predominated among the anatomical sites and the diverse geographical regions. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-16 lineages vary according to anatomical and geographical region. According to this preliminary evaluation of the current literature, we hypothesize that, similar to women, specific HPV-16 variants may also be associated to increased cancer risk in men.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Anal Canal/virology , Genital Diseases, Male/virology , Geography , Human papillomavirus 16/classification , Human papillomavirus 16/pathogenicity , Humans , Male , Mouth/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications
20.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 232, 2021 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676451

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of information on full anogenital evaluation of women with a previous history of anogenital neoplasia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Homerton Anogenital Neoplasia Service records from January 2012 to March 2017, to identify all new referrals of women with previous anogenital neoplasia, who had had at least one complete examination of all anogenital sites. Multizonal anogenital disease (MZD) was defined as the presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)/carcinoma concurrently at two or more of the following sites/zones: perianus, anal canal, vulva, vagina or cervix. RESULTS: 253 women were included, mean age was 47 (SD=15) years and median duration of follow-up was 12 (IQR=21) months. Fifty-six women (22%) were diagnosed with MZD at first assessment and/or during follow-up. Current smokers (RR=1.84, 95% CI 1.21-2.79, p=0.004) and women on immunodulators/immunosuppressive drugs (RR=2.57, 95% CI 1.72-3.86, p<0.001) had an increased risk for MZD. The risk was lower for women without a previous history of anogenital high-grade lesions/cancer compared to those with this history (RR=0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.45, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Multizonal assessment was important to diagnose occult areas of disease and should be especially considered in current smokers, pharmacologically immunocompromised and those with a previous history of anogenital HSIL/cancer.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Anal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Anal Canal/pathology , Anal Canal/virology , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/virology , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Colposcopy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/virology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Vagina/diagnostic imaging , Vagina/pathology , Vagina/virology , Vulva/diagnostic imaging , Vulva/pathology , Vulva/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...