Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23.115
Filter
1.
Int Wound J ; 21(6): e14907, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822706

ABSTRACT

Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the analgesic activity of sesame oil among patients with limb trauma; nevertheless, their findings are inconsistent. Hence, this review aimed to clarify the impact of topical administration of sesame oil on acute pain of adult outpatients with minor limb trauma. The online databases (e.g., Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched up to 31 January 2024. The RCTs were included if they compared the effect of applying standard treatments plus topical sesame oil to administering standard treatments alone or with a placebo/sham treatment. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool were applied to address the evidence quality and the study's methodological rigour, respectively. Four RCTs had the inclusion criteria, and their findings were pooled in a meta-analysis employing a random-effects approach. According to the pooled analysis, the reduction in mean change of the pain score from baseline to the second/third intervention day was significantly higher in favour of clients who received standard care plus daily massage of the trauma site with sesame oil compared to those who received a control condition (weighted mean difference: -1.10; 95% confidence interval [-1.62, -0.57]; p < 0.001). However, the evidence quality was moderate, and only two studies had good methodological rigour. Hence, more high-quality studies are needed to make a solid evidence-based conclusion about the favourable consequence of topical sesame oil on alleviating acute traumatic limb pain.


Subject(s)
Administration, Topical , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sesame Oil , Humans , Sesame Oil/therapeutic use , Sesame Oil/administration & dosage , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Adult , Female , Male , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement/methods , Middle Aged , Extremities/injuries
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methylmercury (MeHg), the causative agent of Minamata disease, damages the cranial nervous system and causes specific sensory disturbances, especially hypoesthesia, in the extremities. However, recent reports demonstrate that patients with chronic Minamata disease conversely develop neuropathic pain in the lower extremities. Studies on our established Minamata disease model rats showed that MeHg-mediated neurodegeneration might induce neuropathic pain by over time through inducing rewiring with neuronal activation in the somatosensory cortex via microglial activation in the spinal dorsal horn. METHODS: In this study, the effects of gabapentin, a potentially effective treatment for neuropathic pain, was evaluated using this Minamata disease model rats. To further elucidate the mechanism of its medicinal effects, histochemical and biochemical analyses of the nervous system of Minamata disease model rats were conducted. RESULTS: Gabapentin treatment restored the reduction in the pain threshold caused by MeHg exposure in rats. Histochemical and biochemical analyses revealed that gabapentin showed no effect on MeHg-induced neurodegeneration in entire nervous system and microglial activation in the spinal dorsal horn. However, it was shown that gabapentin may reduce excessive synaptogenesis through its antagonist action on the alpha2-delta-1 subunit of calcium channels in the somatosensory cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that gabapentin may alleviated neuropathic pain in MeHg poisoning, as typified by Minamata disease, by reversibly modulation synaptic rewiring in the somatosensory cortex.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Gabapentin , Neuralgia , Animals , Gabapentin/pharmacology , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Rats , Male , Methylmercury Compounds , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Amines/pharmacology , Amines/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/pharmacology , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/pharmacology , Rats, Wistar
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(1): 10-16, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Regional analgesia is effective for post-thoracotomy pain. The primary objective of the study is to compare the intraoperative requirement of isoflurane and fentanyl between general anaesthesia (GA) with epidural analgesia and GA with paravertebral analgesia. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A prospective observational comparative study was conducted on 56 patients undergoing open thoracotomy procedures. The patients were divided into two groups of 28 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group: Group GAE - received thoracic epidural catheterization with GA, and Group GAP - received ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral catheterization on the operative side with GA. Intraoperative requirement of isoflurane, fentanyl, postoperative analgesia, stress response, need of rescue analgesics and adverse effects were observed and analysed. RESULTS: 25 patients in each group were included in the data analysis. The intraoperative requirement of isoflurane (32.28 ± 1.88 vs 48.31 ± 4.34 ml; p < 0.0001) and fentanyl (128.87 ± 25.12 vs 157 ± 30.92 µg; p = 0.0009) were significantly less in the GAE group than in the GAP group. VAS scores and need of rescue analgesics and blood glucose levels were not statistically significant during the postoperative period (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable except for hypotension and urinary retention which were significantly higher in the GAE group. CONCLUSION: GA with epidural analgesia resulted in significant reduction in the intraoperative consumption of isoflurane and fentanyl in comparison to GA with paravertebral analgesia. However, both the techniques were equally effective in the postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Anesthesia, General , Fentanyl , Pain, Postoperative , Thoracotomy , Humans , Female , Male , Thoracotomy/methods , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, General/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Aged , Nerve Block/methods
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 304, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration in preemptive analgesia and anxiety control in lower third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial conducted with patients divided into two groups: control group, receiving placebo and dexamethasone, and test group, receiving pregabalin and dexamethasone preoperatively. The evaluated variables were pain, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), anxiety assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaires, hemodynamic parameters [Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)], and sedation assessed by the Ramsay scale. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included. The test group exhibited a significant reduction in pain at 2,4,6,8,12,16,24, and 48 h after surgery and in the consumption of rescue analgesics. Anxiety, evaluated by STAI and VAS, showed a significant decrease in the test group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in BP at most of the assessed time points (p < 0.05) and a significant reduction in HR at two different time intervals (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), indicating a positive effect in the test group. There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the groups. Sedation assessment revealed a significant difference at all time points favoring the test group (p < 0.05). There were no significant postoperative adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin coadministered with dexamethasone demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling postoperative pain and anxiety, as well as a sedative effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The coadministration of pregabalin with dexamethasone may presents potential advantages in both pain modulation and psychological well-being of individuals undergoing third molar surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC), No. RBR-378h6t6.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Dexamethasone , Drug Therapy, Combination , Molar, Third , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative , Pregabalin , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Male , Female , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Adult , Dental Anxiety/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pain Management/methods
5.
J Affect Disord ; 358: 205-210, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729220

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between gabapentin use and the risk of dementia in patients with chronic pain, considering the rising concerns of dementia in an aging population and the potential cognitive impacts of chronic pain management. DESIGN: A nested case-control study utilizing data from a longitudinal health insurance database. SETTING: The study is based on a longitudinal health insurance database spanning 2000-2019 in Taiwan. PATIENTS: A total of 201,492 patients aged 50 years and older diagnosed with chronic pain between 2001 and 2017 were included. The study focused on individuals with chronic pain, excluding those diagnosed with dementia a year before or after their chronic pain diagnosis. INTERVENTION: Analysis of gabapentin prescription history was conducted, considering the cumulative dose from the chronic pain diagnosis date to the dementia diagnosis date or equivalent period for controls. MEASUREMENT: Data included demographics, gabapentin prescription history, and comorbidities. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for dementia risk. MAIN RESULTS: No significant difference in the risk of dementia was found between low and high cumulative doses of gabapentin. The adjusted odds ratio for dementia risk associated with gabapentin use was 0.91 (95 % C.I. 0.83-1.01), indicating no substantial increase in risk. CONCLUSION: Long-term Gabapentin therapy for chronic pain is not associated with a differential risk of dementia across dosage levels, irrespective of age or gender. Further study into its potential cognitive impacts is essential.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Chronic Pain , Dementia , Gabapentin , Humans , Gabapentin/adverse effects , Female , Male , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Aged , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/chemically induced , Middle Aged , Taiwan/epidemiology , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Factors
6.
J Feline Med Surg ; 26(5): 1098612X241246518, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710218

ABSTRACT

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Chronic pain is a significant welfare concern in cats, and neuropathic pain, which arises from aberrant processing of sensory signals within the nervous system, is a subcategory of this type of pain. To comprehend this condition and how multimodal pharmacotherapy plays a central role in alleviating discomfort, it is crucial to delve into the anatomy of nociception and pain perception. In addition, there is an intricate interplay between emotional health and chronic pain in cats, and understanding and addressing the emotional factors that contribute to pain perception, and vice versa, is essential for comprehensive care.Clinical approach:Neuropathic pain is suspected if there is abnormal sensation in the area of the distribution of pain, together with a positive response to trial treatment with drugs effective for neuropathic pain. Ideally, this clinical suspicion would be supported by confirmation of a lesion at this neurolocalisation using diagnostic modalities such as MRI and neuroelectrophysiology. Alternatively, there may be a history of known trauma at that site. A variety of therapies, including analgesic, anti-inflammatory and adjuvant drugs, and neuromodulation (eg, TENS or acupuncture), can be employed to address different facets of pain pathways.Aim:This review article, aimed at primary care/ general practitioners, focuses on the identification and management of neuropathic pain in cats. Three case vignettes are included and a structured treatment algorithm is presented to guide veterinarians in tailoring interventions.Evidence base:The review draws on current literature, where available, along with the author's extensive experience and research.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Neuralgia , Pain Management , Cats , Animals , Neuralgia/veterinary , Neuralgia/therapy , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Cat Diseases/therapy , Cat Diseases/diagnosis , Pain Management/veterinary , Pain Management/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/veterinary
7.
Molecules ; 29(9)2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731572

ABSTRACT

Various plant species from the Litsea genus have been claimed to be beneficial for pain relief. The PRISMA approach was adopted to identify studies that reported analgesic properties of plants from the Litsea genus. Out of 450 records returned, 19 primary studies revealed the analgesic potential of nine Litsea species including (1) Litsea cubeba, (2) Litsea elliptibacea, (3) Litsea japonica, (4) Litsea glutinosa, (5) Litsea glaucescens, (6) Litsea guatemalensis, (7) Litsea lancifolia, (8) Litsea liyuyingi and (9) Litsea monopetala. Six of the species, 1, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9, demonstrated peripheral antinociceptive properties as they inhibited acetic-acid-induced writhing in animal models. Species 1, 3, 4, 8 and 9 further showed effects via the central analgesic route at the spinal level by increasing the latencies of heat stimulated-nocifensive responses in the tail flick assay. The hot plate assay also revealed the efficacies of 4 and 9 at the supraspinal level. Species 6 was reported to ameliorate hyperalgesia induced via partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL). The antinociceptive effects of 1 and 3 were attributed to the regulatory effects of their bioactive compounds on inflammatory mediators. As for 2 and 5, their analgesic effect may be a result of their activity with the 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor (5-HT1AR) which disrupted the pain-stimulating actions of 5-HT. Antinociceptive activities were documented for various major compounds of the Litsea plants. Overall, the findings suggested Litsea species as good sources of antinociceptive compounds that can be further developed to complement or substitute prescription drugs for pain management.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Litsea , Plant Extracts , Litsea/chemistry , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Animals , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Humans
8.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 366, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750535

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of over-the-counter analgesics (OTCA) is common among adolescents and has been linked with increased symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, little is known about which specific symptoms are most strongly connected to OTCA usage. The current study assessed which anxiety and depression symptoms were most closely associated with OTCA usage in a large sample of adolescents and examined whether this differed across genders. METHOD: The present study was based on data from 626,581 participants from the Ungdata survey in Norway. Associations between OTCA and anxiety and depression symptoms were examined using network analysis. Non-regularized partial-correlation networks were constructed to estimate the conditional dependent relations between the use of OTCA and symptoms while controlling for pain. Gender-specific networks were created for comparison. RESULTS: OTCA usage was associated with most symptoms, even after controlling for pain, with the strongest associations with "sleep problems", "stiff or tense", "everything is a struggle" and "suddenly scared". There were some gender differences, showing that "sleep problems" and "hopeless" were more strongly related to OTCA usage in females, whereas "stiff or tense" was more strongly related to OTCA usage in males. CONCLUSION: Overall, the somatic symptoms of anxiety and depression displayed the strongest associations with OTCA usage. When examining the gender-specific networks, both showed similar trends, although males exhibited slightly stronger associations between OTCA usage and somatic symptoms.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Anxiety , Depression , Nonprescription Drugs , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Norway/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11599, 2024 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773296

ABSTRACT

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by disruptions in pain processing within the central nervous system. It exhibits a high prevalence among patients with a history of traumatic experiences, notably childhood sexual abuse (CSA). This study compared the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to the current pharmacological standard of care for individuals suffering from CSA-related FMS. Forty-eight participants diagnosed with FMS and a history of CSA were randomly assigned to either the HBOT group (60 sessions of 100% oxygen at 2 ATA for 90 min, with air breaks every 5 min) or the medication (MED) group (FDA-approved medications, Pregabalin and Duloxetine). The primary endpoint was the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) score, while secondary endpoints encompassed emotional status and daily functioning questionnaires, as well as pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation tests. Brain activity was evaluated through single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Results revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for the FIQ score favoring HBOT over MED (p < 0.001), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = - 1.27). Similar findings were observed in emotional symptoms and functional measures. SPECT imaging demonstrated an increase in activity in pre-frontal and temporal brain areas, which correlated with symptoms improvement. In conclusion, HBOT exhibited superior benefits over medications in terms of physical, functional, and emotional improvements among FMS patients with a history of CSA. This associated with increased activity in pre-frontal and temporal brain areas, highlighting the neuroplasticity effect of HBOT.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse, Sexual , Fibromyalgia , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Humans , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Hyperbaric Oxygenation/methods , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Prospective Studies , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Analgesics/therapeutic use
11.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731944

ABSTRACT

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a prevalent complication of joint replacement surgery which has the potential to decrease patient satisfaction, increase financial burden, and lead to long-term disability. The identification of risk factors for CPSP following TKA and THA is challenging but essential for targeted preventative therapy. Recent meta-analyses and individual studies highlight associations between elevated state anxiety, depression scores, preoperative pain, diabetes, sleep disturbances, and various other factors with an increased risk of CPSP, with differences observed in prevalence between TKA and THA. While the etiology of CPSP is not fully understood, several factors such as chronic inflammation and preoperative central sensitization have been identified. Other potential mechanisms include genetic factors (e.g., catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 6 (KCNJ6) genes), lipid markers, and psychological risk factors (anxiety and depression). With regards to therapeutics and prevention, multimodal pharmacological analgesia, emphasizing nonopioid analgesics like acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has gained prominence over epidural analgesia. Nerve blocks and local infiltrative anesthesia have shown mixed results in preventing CPSP. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, exhibits antihyperalgesic properties, but its efficacy in reducing CPSP is inconclusive. Lidocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, shows tentative positive effects on CPSP. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have mixed results, while gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, present hopeful data but require further research, especially in the context of TKA and THA, to justify their use for CPSP prevention.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Pain Management/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/pharmacology
12.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2357235, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tension-type headache is the most common type of primary headache and results in a huge socioeconomic burden. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for the treatment of episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) in adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese BioMedical Literature database and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for eligible randomized clinical trials reporting the efficacy and/or safety of simple analgesics. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare relative efficacy and safety. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018090554. RESULTS: We highlighted six studies including 3507 patients. For the 2 h pain-free rate, the SUCRA ranking was ibuprofen > diclofenac-K > ketoprofen > acetaminophen > naproxen > placebo. All drugs except naproxen reported a higher 2 h pain-free rate than placebo, with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.86 (95% credible interval, CrI: 1.62-5.42) for ibuprofen and 2.61 (1.53-4.88) for diclofenac-K. For adverse events rate, the SUCRA ranking was: metamizol > diclofenac-K > ibuprofen > lumiracoxib > placebo > aspirin > acetaminophen > naproxen > ketoprofen. The adverse event rates of all analgesics were no higher than those of placebo, except for ketoprofen. Moreover, all drugs were superior to placebo in the global assessment of efficacy. In particular, the RR of lumiracoxib was 2.47 (1.57-4.57). Global heterogeneity I2 between the studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Simple analgesics are considered more effective and safe as a placebo for ETTH in adults. Our results suggest that ibuprofen and diclofenac-K may be the two best treatment options for patients with ETTH from a comprehensive point of view (both high-quality evidence).


To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing the available data on adult patients with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) treated with different simple analgesics recommended by the current guidelines.Ibuprofen (400 mg) and diclofenac-K (12.5 mg, 25 mg) are potentially the most effective and safe treatment options, supported by high-quality evidence.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Ibuprofen , Network Meta-Analysis , Tension-Type Headache , Humans , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Adult , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Bayes Theorem , Treatment Outcome , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Naproxen/adverse effects , Naproxen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/adverse effects , Ketoprofen/therapeutic use , Ketoprofen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Female , Male
13.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 198: 106797, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735401

ABSTRACT

The multicomponent etiology, complex clinical implications, dose-based side effect and degree of pain mitigation associated with the current pharmacological therapy is incapable in complete resolution of chronic neuropathic pain patients which necessitates the perpetual requirement of novel medication therapy. Therefore, this study explored the ameliorative aptitude of two novel methanimine imitative like (E)-N-(4-nitrobenzylidene)-4­chloro-2-iodobenzamine (KB 09) and (E)-N-(4-methylbenzylidene)-4­chloro-2-iodobenzamine (KB 10) in chronic constriction injury (CCI) of sciatic nerve induced neuropathic pain in rat model. Standard behavioral tests like dynamic and static allodynia, cold, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia along with rotarod activity were performed at various experimental days like 0, 3, 7, 14 and 21. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on spinal tissue and antioxidant assays on sciatic nerve were executed accompanied by molecular docking and simulation studies. Prolonged ligation of sciatic nerve expressively induced hyperalgesia as well as allodynia in rats. KB 09 and KB 10 substantially attenuated the CCI elicited hyperalgesia and allodynia. They significantly reduced the biomarkers of pain and inflammation like Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in ELISA and while enhanced the GSH, SOD and CAT and diminished the MDA levels during antioxidant assays. KB 09 displayed -9.62 kcal/mol with TNF-α and -7.68 kcal/mol binding energy with IL-6 whereas KB 10 exhibited binding energy of -8.20 kcal/mol with IL-6 while -11.68 kcal/mol with TNF-α and hence both trial compounds ensured stable interaction with IL-6 and TNF-α during computational analysis. The results advocated that both methanimine derivatives might be novel candidates for attenuation of CCI-induced neuropathic pain prospects via anti-nociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Hyperalgesia , Molecular Docking Simulation , Neuralgia , Sciatic Nerve , Animals , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Neuralgia/metabolism , Male , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Sciatic Nerve/injuries , Sciatic Nerve/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Disease Models, Animal , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/chemistry , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Antioxidants/chemistry , Computer Simulation , Constriction , Imines/chemistry , Imines/pharmacology
14.
Trials ; 25(1): 330, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common, disabling, and costly of all pain conditions. While evidence exists for the efficacy of both duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as monotherapy, there is a clear need to consider study of treatment components that may complement each other. In addition, given the reported association between patient's adherence and treatment outcomes, strategies are needed to enhance participant's motivation to adopt and maintain continued use of newly learned pain coping skills from CBT. METHODS: Two hundred eighty participants will be recruited from the primary care clinics of a large academic health care system in North Carolina. Participants with CMP will be randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based self-guided CBT) with phone-based motivational interviewing (MI), (2) combination treatment without phone-based MI, and (3) duloxetine monotherapy. Participants will be in the study for 24 weeks and will be assessed at baseline, week 13, and week 25. The primary outcome is the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Global Pain Severity score, which combines BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference. Secondary measures include between-group comparisons in mean BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference scores. Data collection and outcome assessment will be blinded to treatment group assignment. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will determine if combination treatment with duloxetine and web-based CBT is superior to duloxetine monotherapy for the management of CMP. Furthermore, this RCT will determine the effectiveness of phone-based motivational interviewing in promoting the continued practice of pain coping skills, thereby enhancing treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04395001 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered on May 15, 2020.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Duloxetine Hydrochloride , Musculoskeletal Pain , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Humans , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/psychology , Musculoskeletal Pain/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality Therapy , Pain Measurement , Telephone , Motivational Interviewing , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Internet-Based Intervention , Pain Management/methods , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult
15.
Int J Med Sci ; 21(7): 1265-1273, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818478

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of pregabalin on microglial differentiation in rats with neuropathic pain (NP) induced by sciatic nerve ligation and transection. After confirming NP, the rats were randomly allocated to either a pregabalin or control group. The pregabalin group received intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg pregabalin, while the control group received an equivalent volume of normal saline following surgery. On postoperative day 28, neuronal damage, microglial activity, and microglial differentiation were assessed. The pregabalin group exhibited significantly less neuronal damage compared to the control group, along with a significant decrease in activated microglial expression in both the brain and spinal cord. Pregabalin treatment also significantly altered the microglial phenotype expression, with a decrease in the M1 phenotype percentage and an increase in the M2 phenotype percentage in both the brain (M1 phenotype: 43.52 ± 12.16% and 18.00 ± 8.57% in the control and pregabalin groups, respectively; difference: 27.26 [15.18-42.10], p = 0.002; M2 phenotype: 16.88 ± 6.47% and 39.63 ± 5.82% in the control and pregabalin groups, respectively; difference 22.04 [17.17-32.70], p < 0.001) and the spinal cord ipsilateral to nerve injury (M1 phenotype: 44.35 ± 12.12% and 13.78 ± 5.39% in the control and pregabalin groups, respectively; difference 30.46 [21.73-44.45], p < 0.001; M2 phenotype: 7.64 ± 3.91% and 33.66 ± 7.95% in the control and pregabalin groups, respectively; difference 27.41 [21.21-36.30], p < 0.001). Overall, pregabalin treatment significantly decreased the microglial M1 phenotype while increasing the microglial M2 phenotype in NP rats.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Microglia , Neuralgia , Pregabalin , Animals , Pregabalin/pharmacology , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Microglia/drug effects , Microglia/pathology , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Neuralgia/pathology , Neuralgia/etiology , Rats , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Male , Spinal Cord/drug effects , Spinal Cord/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Sciatic Nerve/drug effects , Sciatic Nerve/pathology , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Humans , Brain/drug effects , Brain/pathology
16.
Iran J Med Sci ; 49(5): 313-321, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751874

ABSTRACT

Background: There is no definite recommendation for melatonin supplementation in episodic migraine. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of melatonin on reducing the frequency and severity of migraine attacks. Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at Golestan Hospital of Ahvaz, Iran, in 2021. A total of 60 patients with episodic migraine were randomly assigned into 2 groups of receiving 3 mg melatonin (intervention group; n=30) or the same dose of placebo (control group; n=30) along with baseline therapy (propranolol 20 mg, BID) for two months. The attack frequency, attack duration, attack severity (based on VAS), the number of analgesic intakes, drug complications, Migraine Disability Assessment score (MIDAS), and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) were evaluated at baseline and in the first, second, third, and fourth months of follow-up. The independent t test, chi-square, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures were used to compare variables between the two groups. Results: In both groups, the frequency, duration, and severity of attacks, taking analgesics, MIDAS, and PSQI scores during follow-up decreased significantly (P<0.001). After treatment, the mean frequency (P=0.032) and duration of attacks (P=0.001), taking analgesic (P<0.001), and MIDAS (P<0.001) and PSQI scores (P<0.001) in the melatonin group were lower than placebo. Only the attack severity was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.126). Side effects were observed in two patients (6.7%) in the melatonin group and one patient (3.3%) in the placebo group (P>0.999). Conclusion: Our study shows that melatonin was more efficacious than the placebo in the reduction of frequency and duration of migraine attacks. It was equally safe as the placebo and might be effective in the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults.Trial Registration Number: IRCT20190107042264N5.


Subject(s)
Melatonin , Migraine Disorders , Humans , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Melatonin/pharmacology , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Iran , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/pharmacology
17.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(15)2024 Apr 08.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708699

ABSTRACT

In the last decade, patients with chronic pain have expressed increasing interest in cannabis-derived products for adjuvant therapy when treatment is deemed refractory to conventional analgesics. At present, clinical evidence to support this treatment approach appears to be sparse. Not because clinical studies as such are lacking, but rather as a result of methodological bias in relation to study design, patient populations, and treatment protocols. In this review, research in cannabis medicine for relief of chronic pain is reviewed, mainly with reference to published meta-analytic studies.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Medical Marijuana , Humans , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use
18.
Hepatol Commun ; 8(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize pain and analgesic use in a large contemporary cohort of patients with cirrhosis and to associate pain with unplanned health care utilization and clinical outcomes in this population. METHODS: We included all patients with cirrhosis seen in UCSF hepatology clinics from 2013 to 2020. Pain severity and location were determined using documented pain scores at the initial visit; "significant pain" was defined as moderate or severe using established cutoffs. Demographic, clinical, and medication data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Associations between significant pain and our primary outcome of 1-year unplanned health care utilization (ie, emergency department visit or hospitalization) and our secondary outcomes of mortality and liver transplantation were explored in multivariable models. RESULTS: Among 5333 patients with cirrhosis, 32% had a nonzero pain score at their initial visit and 25% had significant (ie moderate/severe) pain. Sixty percent of patients with significant pain used ≥1 analgesic; 34% used opioids. Patients with cirrhosis with significant pain had similar Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores (14 vs. 13), but higher rates of decompensation (65% vs. 55%). The most common pain location was the abdomen (44%). Patients with abdominal pain, compared to pain in other locations, were more likely to have decompensation (72% vs. 56%). Significant pain was independently associated with unplanned health care utilization (adjusted odds ratio: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5) and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Pain among patients with cirrhosis is often not well-controlled despite analgesic use, and significant pain is associated with unplanned health care utilization and mortality in this population. Effectively identifying and treating pain are essential in reducing costs and improving quality of life and outcomes among patients with cirrhosis.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Liver Cirrhosis , Pain , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Male , Female , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Aged , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Cost of Illness
19.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 331: 118316, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729540

ABSTRACT

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Yuanhu Zhitong Prescription (YZP) is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula for neuropathic pain (NP) therapy with a satisfying clinical efficacy. However, the underlying pharmacological mechanism and its compatibility principle remain unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to investigate the analgesic and compatibility mechanisms of YZP on neuropathic pain (NP) at the gene and biological process levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chronic constriction injury (CCI) rats were intragastrically administrated with extracts of YZP, YH and BZ separately, and then mechanical hypersensitivity were measured to evaluate the analgesic effects between YH and BZ before and after compatibility. Then, RNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses were performed to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying YZP's analgesia and compatibility. Finally, the expression levels and significant differences of key genes were analyzed. RESULTS: Behaviorally, both YZP and YH effectively alleviated mechanical allodynia in CCI rats, with YZP being superior to YH. In contrast, we did not observe an analgesic effect of BZ. Genetically, YZP, YH, and BZ reversed the expression levels of 52, 34, and 42 aberrant genes in the spinal cord of CCI rats, respectively. Mechanically, YZP was revealed to alleviate NP mainly by modulating the inflammatory response and neuropeptide signaling pathway, which are the dominant effective processes of YH. Interestingly, the effective targets of YZP were especially enriched in leukocyte activation and cytokine-mediated signaling pathways. Moreover, BZ was found to exert an adjunctive effect in enhancing the analgesic effect of YH by promoting skeletal muscle tissue regeneration and modulating calcium ion transport. CONCLUSIONS: YH, as the monarch drug, plays a dominant role in the analgesic effect of YZP that effectively relieves NP by inhibiting the spinal inflammation and neuropeptide signaling pathway. BZ, as the minister drug, not only synergistically enhances analgesic processes of YH but also helps to alleviate the accompanying symptoms of NP. Consequently, YZP exerted a more potent analgesic effect than YH and BZ alone. In conclusion, our findings offer new insights into understanding the pharmacological mechanism and compatibility principle of YZP, which may support its clinical application in NP therapy.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Neuralgia , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Animals , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Male , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/pharmacology , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Rats , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Spinal Cord/drug effects , Spinal Cord/metabolism , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Disease Models, Animal , Inflammation/drug therapy
20.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e081971, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740508

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal hospitalisations in the USA cause over US$130 billion in expenditures, and acute pancreatitis is a leading cause of these hospitalisations. Adequate pain control is one of the primary treatment goals for acute pancreatitis. Though opioids are commonly used for analgesia in these patients, there have been concerns about short-term and long-term side effects of using opioids. Recently, non-opioid medications have been studied to treat pain in patients with acute pancreatitis. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of analgesic medication for non-severe, acute pancreatitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search multiple electronic databases for randomised controlled trials that study pain management in patients with non-severe, acute pancreatitis. The intervention will be any analgesic for acute pancreatitis in the hospital setting. The comparison group will be patients who received a placebo or other active interventions for pain management. The primary outcomes of interest include pain scores and the need for supplementary analgesia. The secondary outcomes will be serious adverse events, local complications, progression to severe pancreatitis, transfer to the intensive care unit, length of hospitalisation, time to start enteral feeds, 30-day all-cause mortality and Quality of Life Scale scores. If sufficient homogeneity exists among included studies, the findings will be pooled using a traditional pairwise and network meta-analysis. The risk of bias in randomised control trials will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to report the certainty of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will not involve direct contact with human subjects. The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. They will give healthcare providers a better awareness of the optimal analgesic medication for pain treatment in non-severe, acute pancreatitis.


Subject(s)
Network Meta-Analysis , Pain Management , Pancreatitis , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Humans , Pancreatitis/drug therapy , Pancreatitis/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Research Design , Acute Disease , Analgesia/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...