Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.811
Filter
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 8-16, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis proportions of incidence are increasing globally. However, limited data are available regarding anaphylaxis in the pediatric population of Greece. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate management of anaphylaxis in Greek pediatric departments. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire-based study of children aged less than 16 years presenting with anaphylaxis in 10 national pediatric hospitals over a period of 2 years. Management of anaphylaxis was assessed prior to and after an informative intervention. RESULTS: In all, 127 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. Epinephrine was administered in almost half of all cases (51.2%), predominantly through intramuscular route (88.5%), while the majority of anaphylaxis patients were treated with antihistamines (92.9%) and corticosteroids (70.1%). Epinephrine was more likely administered by physicians if the elicitor was a drug (P < 0.003). Regarding long-term management, an epinephrine auto-injector was prescribed in 66.9% of patients. Follow-up information was available for most of the patients (92.9%), the majority of whom (76.3%) were referred to an allergist. More than half of these patients (63.6%) had a documented allergy follow-up, which identified a causative allergen in 53.3% of cases. No statistically significant differences were recorded prior to and after the intervention regarding management of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study highlighted the necessity of further improvement in terms of anaphylaxis treatment and secondary prevention measures. This presupposes appropriate education and training of healthcare professionals, thus contributing to proper and comprehensive care of the pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Epinephrine , Humans , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Greece/epidemiology , Child , Male , Female , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Infant , Surveys and Questionnaires , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 60-64, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721956

ABSTRACT

Delayed anaphylaxis after ingestion of red meat because of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) syndrome has increased in recent years. The mechanism involves an immunoglobulin E reaction to alpha-gal, a molecule found in mammalian meat, dairy products, medications and excipients containing mammalian-derived components, and tick salivary glycans. Sensitization occurs due to the bite of a lone star tick and the transmission of alpha-gal molecules into person's bloodstream. We describe a case of alpha-gal syndrome with severe food, drug, and perioperative allergy in which anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock occurred immediately after an emergency surgical procedure, when a gelatin-containing drug was injected. This case study confirms that the clinical manifestations of alpha-gal syndrome could be different depending on the route of administration, with immediate reactions if an alpha-gal-containing drug is injected and delayed type allergic manifestations occurring several hours after oral intake. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of risk communication in case of exposure to medical products and surgical procedures of patients with alpha-gal syndrome and to encourage drug manufacturers to indicate clearly the origin of excipients in product literature.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Shock , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Shock/etiology , Shock/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Male , Animals , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Excipients/adverse effects , Disaccharides/immunology , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Female , Trisaccharides/immunology , Gelatin/adverse effects , Syndrome
3.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 73-77, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721958

ABSTRACT

For the first time 15 years ago, tablet allergen immunotherapy (T-AIT) formulations were approved by regulatory agencies for treating allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen in adults and children aged >5 years. Extensive evidences existed about effectiveness and safety of AIT. However, the safety profile is particularly compelling in children. Generally, T-AIT causes local reactions, mostly in the oral cavity, that are usually mild-to-moderate and often self-resolving. However, systemic allergic reactions are also observed with T-AIT, anaphylaxis representing the most fearsome adverse event, considering that it occurs in subjects treated for allergic rhinitis. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of patients reporting anaphylaxis because of T-AIT. Nine cases of anaphylactic reactions were reported in literature. Notably, no death was reported using T-AIT. This outcome was very important as it underscored the substantial safety of T-AIT. However, T-AIT deserves careful attention, mainly in the pediatric population. In this regard, after the first report of anaphylactic reaction at the first administration of T-AIT, manufacturers recommended that the first dose should be administered in a medical facility in the presence of staff with experience in managing anaphylaxis and the patient should be observed for at least 30 min. Interestingly, reported anaphylactic reactions were due to grass pollen extracts, with no report concerning other allergen extracts. However, it is relevant to note that anaphylactic reactions because of T-AIT are not reported in recent years.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Anaphylaxis , Desensitization, Immunologic , Tablets , Humans , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Allergens/immunology , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/adverse effects , Child , Pollen/immunology , Pollen/adverse effects , Poaceae/immunology , Poaceae/adverse effects , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Adult , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic/immunology , Child, Preschool
4.
Med Clin North Am ; 108(4): 757-776, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816116

ABSTRACT

Stinging insects are a frequent cause of local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. For those with a history of life-threatening anaphylaxis, venom immunotherapy is effective, safe, and can be life-saving. Arachnids are a much less common source of envenomation through bites or stings and are less likely to cause a hypersensitivity reaction. However, recognizing the clinical manifestations when they do present is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment, and, when indicated, consideration of other diagnoses.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Insect Bites and Stings , Humans , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Animals , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Venom Hypersensitivity
5.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 52(3): 147-158, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587791

ABSTRACT

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening emergency that requires prompt recognition and institution of life-saving therapy. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group have partnered to develop the anaphylaxis management guideline along with crisis management cards that are recommended for use in suspected anaphylaxis in the perioperative setting. This is the third version of these guidelines with the second version having been published in 2016. This article contains the revised Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists perioperative anaphylaxis management guideline, with a brief review of the current evidence for the management of anaphylaxis in the perioperative environment.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Humans , New Zealand , Australia , Anesthetists , Perioperative Care/methods
6.
Med Arch ; 78(1): 44-50, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481593

ABSTRACT

Background: Anaphylaxis is known as an acute, severe hypersensitivity reaction that rapidly initiates after exposure to a triggering agent. It is a life-threatening condition, and early recognition and swift intervention are crucial to saving patients' lives. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the ability of certified non-critical care physicians to recognize, manage, and dispose cases of anaphylaxis. Methods: A survey consisting of 19 questions was developed by expert emergency consultants to evaluate physicians' knowledge regarding the recognition, management, and disposition of anaphylactic episodes. Responses were collected through in-person surveys conducted with physicians from various specialties and varying clinical experience levels at a tertiary care center in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Results: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 173 physicians completed the survey, with 81.5% being consultants and 18.5% specialists. Only 5.2% correctly identified all three proposed anaphylaxis clinical scenarios, 16.8% identified two scenarios correctly, and 51.4% identified only one scenario. While 42.8% recognized the first-line management of anaphylaxis, only 24.3% and 24.9% knew the correct epinephrine dose and route, respectively. Regarding the disposition of patients experiencing an anaphylactic episode, 61.9% of responders opted to dispose the case to the emergency department. Conclusion: Our study reveals a knowledge gap among non-critical care physicians practicing in a tertiary care center concerning the identification and management of anaphylaxis. Raising awareness of this life-threatening condition is imperative to address this serious issue.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Physicians , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Arerugi ; 73(2): 196-200, 2024.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522934

ABSTRACT

Sublingual immunotherapy is a widely used treatment, and serious adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis are rare. We report two cases of laryngeal edema as adverse reactions to sublingual immunotherapy, which could be continued due to a change in the administration method. Case 1 presents a 15-year-old male suspected to have had anaphylaxis due to the dust at the age of 6 years. He started treatment with Miticure® and developed laryngeal edema 30 minutes after taking the 10000JAU dose on the 10th day. laryngeal edema was treated with intravenous infusion. Case 2 presents a 48-year-old woman. She started treatment with Cidacure® and developed respiratory distress and laryngeal edema 1 hour after taking the 5000JAU dose on the 5th day. she had resolved mildly without therapeutic intervention. In both cases, the patients were switched to sublingual spitting, resumed with the initial dose cautiously, and were able to continue. Sublingual immunotherapy is a safe treatment, but sudden adverse reactions may occur. Laryngeal symptoms may be treated by changing to the sublingual spitting method, but laryngeal findings should be examined, and the dosage should be carefully increased.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Laryngeal Edema , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Allergens , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Laryngeal Edema/therapy , Laryngeal Edema/drug therapy , Sublingual Immunotherapy/adverse effects
8.
Allergy ; 79(5): 1317-1328, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and management of anaphylaxis are not well-reported in Asia. METHODS: A regional pediatric anaphylaxis registry was established by the Asia-Pacific Research Network for Anaphylaxis (APRA), using standardized protocols for prospective data collection, to evaluate the triggers and management of anaphylaxis in the Asia-Pacific region. Pediatric patients below 18 years presenting with anaphylaxis across four Asian countries/cities (Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong (HK), and Qingdao) were included. Allergen triggers, symptoms, anaphylaxis severity, and management were compared. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2022, 721 anaphylaxis episodes in 689 patients from 16 centers were identified. The mean age at anaphylaxis presentation was 7.0 years (SD = 5.2) and 60% were male. Food was the most common trigger (62%), particularly eggs and cow's milk in children aged 3 years and below. In school-age children, nut anaphylaxis was most common in HK and Singapore, but was rare in the other countries, and wheat was the top allergen in Bangkok. Shellfish anaphylaxis was most common in children aged 7-17. Adrenaline was administered in 60% of cases, with 9% given adrenaline before hospital arrival. Adrenaline devices were prescribed in up to 82% of cases in Thailand but none in Qingdao. CONCLUSIONS: The APRA identified food as the main trigger of anaphylaxis in children, but causative allergens differed even across Asian countries. Fewer than two-thirds of cases received adrenaline treatment, pre-hospital adrenaline usage was low, and adrenaline device prescription remained suboptimal. The registry recognizes an unmet need to strengthen anaphylaxis care and research in Asia-Pacific.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Child , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Asia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Infant , Allergens/immunology , Disease Management , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Registries
9.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(3): 153-159, 2024 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538146

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food allergy is a growing health problem that affects both patients and society in multiple ways. Despite the emergence of novel diagnostic tools, such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) and basophil activation tests (BAT), oral food challenge (OFC) still plays an indispensable role in the management of food allergies. This review aimed to highlight the indications and safety concerns of conducting an OFC and to provide insights into post-OFC management based on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Standardized OFC protocols have regional diversification, especially in Japan and Western countries. Recent studies suggested that the interval between doses should be at least more than an hour. Furthermore, applying a stepwise method tailored to the patient's specific immunoglobulin E level and history of anaphylaxis seems to mitigate these risks. Recent surveys have shown that, following a positive OFC, options other than strict avoidance are also selected. SUMMARY: OFC serves diverse purposes, yet the risks it carries warrant caution. The stepwise protocol appears promising for its safety. Subthreshold consumption following OFC shows potential; however, further research on its efficacy and safety is required. Management following OFC should be tailored and well discussed between clinicians and patients.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Administration, Oral , Allergens/immunology , Allergens/administration & dosage , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Food/adverse effects
10.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(5): 456-459, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412847

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Changes in the cytokine profile from type 2 to type 1 together with the induction of regulatory cells are expected during hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT). The present study was aimed to investigate the changes in type 1, type 2, and regulatory cytokines induced by a Vespula spp. VIT in patients with anaphylaxis to Vespa velutina. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with anaphylaxis due to Vespa velutina were treated with Vespula spp. VIT. Serum cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and IFN-É£) were measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months after starting VIT. RESULTS: A significant increase in serum IFN-y was detected after 6 and 12 months of VIT. An increase in serum IL-10 and a decrease in IL-5 were observed after 12 months. IL-4 was undetectable all along the study, and an unexpected increase of IL-13 was present at 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Vespula spp. VIT seems to be able to induce a shift to type 1 cytokine production measured through IFN-y levels and IL-10 production after, at least, 6 and 12 months of VIT, respectively.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Cytokines , Desensitization, Immunologic , Wasp Venoms , Wasps , Humans , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Cytokines/metabolism , Cytokines/blood , Male , Female , Adult , Animals , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Wasps/immunology , Middle Aged , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Young Adult , Allergens/immunology
11.
JAMA ; 331(6): 510-521, 2024 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349368

ABSTRACT

Importance: An estimated 7.6% of children and 10.8% of adults have IgE-mediated food-protein allergies in the US. IgE-mediated food allergies may cause anaphylaxis and death. A delayed, IgE-mediated allergic response to the food-carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) in mammalian meat affects an estimated 96 000 to 450 000 individuals in the US and is currently a leading cause of food-related anaphylaxis in adults. Observations: In the US, 9 foods account for more than 90% of IgE-mediated food allergies-crustacean shellfish, dairy, peanut, tree nuts, fin fish, egg, wheat, soy, and sesame. Peanut is the leading food-related cause of fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis in the US, followed by tree nuts and shellfish. The fatality rate from anaphylaxis due to food in the US is estimated to be 0.04 per million per year. Alpha-gal syndrome, which is associated with tick bites, is a rising cause of IgE-mediated food anaphylaxis. The seroprevalence of sensitization to alpha-gal ranges from 20% to 31% in the southeastern US. Self-injectable epinephrine is the first-line treatment for food-related anaphylaxis. The cornerstone of IgE-food allergy management is avoidance of the culprit food allergen. There are emerging immunotherapies to desensitize to one or more foods, with one current US Food and Drug Administration-approved oral immunotherapy product for treatment of peanut allergy. Conclusions and Relevance: IgE-mediated food allergies, including delayed IgE-mediated allergic responses to red meat in alpha-gal syndrome, are common in the US, and may cause anaphylaxis and rarely, death. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to food requires prompt treatment with epinephrine injection. Both food-protein allergy and alpha-gal syndrome management require avoiding allergenic foods, whereas alpha-gal syndrome also requires avoiding tick bites.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Tick Bites , Adult , Child , Humans , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Arachis , Epinephrine , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Galactose , Immunoglobulin E , Mammals , Meat , Seroepidemiologic Studies , United States/epidemiology
12.
Curr Pediatr Rev ; 20(3): 224-239, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284339

ABSTRACT

Fish allergy is the important food allergies in childhood, often persisting into adulthood. It can cause severe hypersensitivity reactions, including fatal anaphylaxis; furthermore, avoiding-fish diet has negative nutritional and psychological effects. Recent research studies focus on epitope structures and aim to develop sensitive and specific diagnostic tools, which have a better correlation with clinical reactions. Protocols with hypoallergenic parvalbumin or other recombinant antigens are also under study and will likely lead to new immunotherapy protocols. IgE-mediated fish allergy differs substantially from other forms of immunological adverse reactions to fish, such as Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome and eosinophilic esophagitis. In addition, fish ingestion can cause non-immunological adverse reactions, such as in the case of scombroid poisoning, anisakiasis and toxic poisoning. This review aims to summarize the characteristics of the main immunological and non-immunological fish reactions, analyzing the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and therapy, with a particular focus on clinical management.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Seafood , Child , Humans , Allergens , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Seafood/adverse effects
13.
Anaesthesia ; 79(5): 535-541, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38205901

ABSTRACT

Peri-operative anaphylaxis is a rare but potentially catastrophic event which must be considered whenever unexpected and significant cardiovascular or respiratory compromise occurs during anaesthesia. The Resuscitation Council UK algorithm for peri-operative anaphylaxis highlights the importance of early intravenous adrenaline and fluid resuscitation and provides guidance on the treatment of refractory anaphylaxis and immediate follow-up. This algorithm is endorsed by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, Association of Anaesthetists, British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Clinical Immunology Professional Network of the British Society for Immunology. This document was produced by the Perioperative Allergy Network steering committee in collaboration with the Resuscitation Council UK.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Resuscitation , Anesthetists , United Kingdom
14.
Anaesthesia ; 79(5): 498-505, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38205586

ABSTRACT

The 7th National Audit Project (NAP7) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists studied peri-operative cardiac arrest. Among 59 cases reported as possible anaphylaxis, 33 (56%) were judged to be so by the review panel with high or moderate confidence. Causes in excluded cases included: isolated severe hypotension; bronchospasm; and oesophageal intubation. Severe bronchospasm leading to cardiac arrest was uncommon, but notably in one case led to a reported flat capnograph. In the baseline survey, anaesthetists estimated anaphylaxis as the cause of 10% of cases of peri-operative cardiac arrests and to be among the four most common causes. In a year-long registry of peri-operative cardiac arrest, suspected anaphylaxis was the seventh most common cause accounting for 4% of reports. Initial management was most often with low-dose intravenous adrenaline, and this was without complications. Both the NAP7 baseline survey and case registry provided evidence of reluctance to starting chest compressions when systolic blood pressure had fallen to below 50 mmHg and occasionally even when it was unrecordable. All 33 patients were resuscitated successfully but one patient later died. The one death occurred in a relatively young patient in whom chest compressions were delayed. Overall, peri-operative anaphylaxis leading to cardiac arrest occurred with a similar frequency and patterns of presentation, location, initial rhythm and suspected triggers in NAP7 as in the 6th National Audit Project (NAP6). Outcomes in NAP7 were generally better than for equivalent cases in NAP6.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Bronchial Spasm , Heart Arrest , Humans , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Epinephrine , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Anesthetists
15.
Intern Med J ; 54(2): 265-273, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37461369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially fatal, systemic allergic reaction. Understanding predictors of recurrent and severe anaphylaxis in adults, and identifying gaps in ongoing anaphylaxis care, is needed to minimise its impact. AIMS: To evaluate the risk factors in adults with severe and recurrent anaphylaxis presentations and to evaluate the management of patients in regard to the recommended cascade of care. METHODS: We completed a retrospective audit of adults with confirmed anaphylaxis who presented to an inner-city emergency department from 1 January 2009 through 31 December 2018. Data recorded included demographics, background history, medication use, severity, co-factors, triggers, management, discharge disposition and referral for follow-up. Data were managed in REDCap and analysed using Stata. Associations were assessed through odds ratios (ORs) and t tests. RESULTS: Six hundred sixteen individuals had 689 episodes of anaphylaxis over the audit period. Age over 65 (OR: 5.4 (95% confidence interval, CI: 2.3-13.2), P < 0.0001) and history of asthma (OR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.03-2.5), P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for severe anaphylaxis. History of food allergy (P < 0.001) and food as the trigger were associated with recurrent presentations (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-3.9, P = 0.01). Only 19% of patients met the recommended cascade of care, with post-adrenaline monitoring and recommending follow-up with an allergy specialist demonstrating the largest gaps. There were increased presentations with time but no difference in triggers or severity. CONCLUSIONS: Increased age and asthma were identified as risk factors for severe presentations. History of food allergy was a risk factor for recurrent presentations. Further research is needed on the gaps in care for adults with anaphylaxis to identify the reasons why, so we can better care for these patients.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Asthma , Food Hypersensitivity , Adult , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital , Asthma/complications
16.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 56(2): 51-64, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462108

ABSTRACT

Summary: Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal hypersensitivity reaction but frequently underrecognized. Although its incidence rates vary according to geographical location, it seems clear that there has been a general increase in recent years, either because of greater recognition of this entity or because it is progressing proportionally to the presence of allergic diseases in the world. The development of anaphylaxis management guidelines adapted to local or regional needs seems of utmost importance. Furthermore, it is necessary to assess their implementation and their positive effect regarding diagnosing and treating anaphylaxis. In this review we explore the currently existing definitions of anaphylaxis and its epidemiology, the potential triggers of anaphylaxis and guideline recommendations in terms of diagnosis and management, proposing a novel anaphylaxis calculator and reviewing the current scoring methods for anaphylactic episodes.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Epinephrine , Incidence
18.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 159(1): 4-10, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997319

ABSTRACT

Honeybees are becoming increasingly familiar to the general population due to the growing popularity of backyard and amateur beekeeping. Although bee venom produces reactions ranging from mild local irritation to life-threatening anaphylaxis, it is also used for life-saving desensitization immunotherapy in those with severe reactions to bee stings. The use of honeybee venom for immunotherapy has increased due to an enhanced interest in natural therapeutics. Recently, honeybee venom has been administered as a successful, safe, and cost-effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, back pain, and skin diseases. During the past two decades, studies have tested honeybee venom's efficacy for treating various skin disorders, including atopic dermatitis, wound healing, and psoriasis. We will review bee venom from multiple perspectives, including its medical applications and mechanisms for dermatological pathologies.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Bee Venoms , Insect Bites and Stings , Humans , Bees , Animals , Bee Venoms/therapeutic use , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Apitherapy , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Treatment Outcome
19.
A A Pract ; 17(11): e01725, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934659

ABSTRACT

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening, systemic, hypersensitivity reaction, manifested by urticaria, hypotension, and respiratory symptoms. Antigens that are cleared renally may have protracted exposure in patients with impaired renal function, resulting in prolonged and refractory anaphylactic shock. After administration of sugammadex, a 47-year-old man developed prolonged, refractory anaphylactic shock, with anuria due to acute kidney injury. The patient was treated with continuous, short-term, veno-venous hemodiafiltration. Initiating this therapy in patients with refractory anaphylactic shock and anuria due to an antigen that is excreted renally can expedite recovery.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Anuria , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Hypotension , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Sugammadex/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anuria/chemically induced , Hypotension/chemically induced
20.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 57(9): 1299-1308, 2023 Sep 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743288

ABSTRACT

Anaphylaxis is the most severe allergic reaction, demanding immediate management by health care providers, which is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated in China. In addition to the classic IgE-mediated pathway, non-IgE dependent pathway has also been extensively studied in the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis. Recently, the atypical symptoms induced by widespread used monoclonal antibodies and biologics have been reported. The goal of this article is to recognize the phenotypes (triggers and presentation) and understand its characteristics through endotypes (mechanisms) of anaphylaxis. Ultimately, the aim is to help allergists and health care providers guide a precision approach to diagnose and manage of anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Phenotype , China , Health Personnel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...