Influencing factors in surgical decision-making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications.

AIM: When making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision-making and experience of complications. METHOD: This qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK-based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. RESULTS: Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision-making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision-making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision-making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified. CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal 'failures', which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify 'personalized' methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes.

The assessment of perioperative risk factors of anastomotic leakage after intestinal surgeries; a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks (AL) are among the most serious complications due to the substantial impact on the quality of life and mortality. Inspite of the advance in diagnostic tools such as laboratory tests and radiological adjuncts, only moderate improvement has been recorded in the rate of detected leaks. The purpose of the research was to assess the perioperative risk factors for AL. METHODS: This study was achieved at MUH and MIH/Egypt within the period between January 2016 and January 2019 for the candidates who underwent bowel anastomosis for small intestinal (except duodenal one) and colorectal pathology. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS of V-26. RESULTS: This study included 315 cases, among them, 27 cases (8.57%) developed AL. The percentage of covering stoma was significantly higher in the non-leakage group vs leakage one (24.3% vs 11.1% respectively). lower albumin, operative timing, perforation, and covering stoma were shown as significant risk factors for leakage, but with multivariate analysis for these factors, the emergency operation, and serum albumin level was the only independent risk factors that revealed the significance consequently (p = 0.043, p = 0.015). The analysis of different predictors of AL on the third day showed that the cut-off point in RR was 29 with 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in prediction of leakage, the cut-off point in RR was 118 with 74% sensitivity and 87% specificity in prediction of leakage and the cut-off point in CRP was 184.7 with 82% sensitivity and 88% specificity in prediction of AL and all had statistically significant value. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative serum albumin level and the emergency operations are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Moreover, leakage should be highly suspected in cases with rising respiratory rate, heart rate, and CRP levels.

Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI).

BACKGROUND: Right hemicolectomy is a very common surgery. Many studies compare different options for laparoscopic ileocolic anastomoses: intra- or extracorporeal; handsewn or stapled; side-to-side or end-to-side. However, there are no studies about the influence that peristalsis could have on this anastomosis. The aim of this study is to compare safety and feasibility of isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. The secondary endpoint is to compare long-term functional outcomes (chronic diarrhoea) and quality of life (GIQLI questionnaire) after a 1-year follow-up period. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, prospective trial in patients undergoing scheduled surgery for right colon cancer with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and isoperistaltic (ISO) or antiperistaltic (ANTI) ileocolic anastomoses. RESULTS: Hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Patients were randomised either to isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic configuration (54 ISO/ANTI). No significant differences in baseline variables were found. No differences in surgical time (130 [120-150] min ISO vs. 140 [127-160] ANTI, p = 0.481), nor in anastomotic time (19 [17-22] vs. 20 [16-25], p = 0.207) and nor in postoperative complications: 37.0% ISO versus 40.7% ANTI, (p = 0.693) were found. There were no differences in postoperative ileus (p = 0.112) nor in anastomotic leakage (3.7% vs. 5.56%, p = 1.00). Differences in "time to first flatus" and "time to first deposition" were found in favour of the antiperistaltic group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017). Anastomotic configuration did not influence hospital stay (3 days [2-6] isoperistaltic vs. 3 [2-4] antiperistaltic, p = 0.236). During follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups at 1, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.154, p = 0.498 and p = 0.683), nor in chronic diarrhoea rates in GIQLI scores (24% ISO vs. 31.4% ANTI, p = 0.541). CONCLUSIONS: The isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis present similar results in terms of performance, safety and functionality. However, further studies must be carried out in order to assess relationship between postoperative ileus and anastomosis configuration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomised Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT02309931).

The ostomy leak impact tool: development and validation of a new patient-reported tool to measure the burden of leakage in ostomy device users.

BACKGROUND: Leakage is a major concern for people who use a stoma, but people's experience and its impact is not well understood. This study aimed to establish a definition of leakage through clinical and user input. This information was used to develop and validate a new measurement tool to understand the impact of leakage for people using a stoma appliance, in the UK, US, France, and Denmark. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a panel of users, hosted by Coloplast, that includes people who currently use Coloplast products. Six clinicians and 41 users took part in concept elicitation interviews. The qualitative findings were used to draft items. A panel of clinical experts was organized to develop and validate items (N = 6). Cognitive debrief interviews were conducted with five users in each country, which resulted in removing some items and revising the measure. A psychometric validation was conducted with 340 people in four countries whereby participants were asked to complete a series of measures online. Full psychometric analyses including validity and reliability were conducted. RESULTS: A final tool was established consisting of three domains related to the burden of leakage: "Emotional impact," "Usual and social activities," and "Coping and control." Convergent validity was evaluated by benchmarking to existing health-related quality of life instruments (domains of SF-36 and Ostomy-Q). This showed high correlation between domains of the leakage tool and other measures, in particular for the Emotional impact domain when compared with SF-36 Emotional well-being and Ostomy-Q Confidence domain (p < 0.001). Coping and control correlated moderately well with most PROs tested for except the physical functioning domains, which showed only modest correlation (p < 0.001). Usual and social activities correlated equally well with all domains. Internal consistency was high for Emotional impact and Usual and social activities (> 0.92). CONCLUSION: The study highlights how users define leakage and its impact in a way that is meaningful to them. This information has been used to develop an instrument to measure leakage which can potentially be used by clinicians and researchers. The instrument demonstrated evidence supporting its reliability and validity as an outcome measure to assess the impact of leakage in stoma care.

Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.

BACKGROUND: After sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer, the impact of anastomotic leakage on function has been well studied. The purpose of the present work was to assess the influence of symptomatic and asymptomatic anastomotic leakage on bowel function and health-related quality of life using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score and the disease-specific questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Quality of Life Questionnaire for Colorectal Cancer. METHODS: The study was a case-matched study with multiple controls per case in a variable ratio from a prospectively maintained database conducted at a tertiary, colorectal operation referral center. A total of 46 patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage (symptomatic, n = 23, asymptomatic, n = 23) after laparoscopic, sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer were matched with all available patients without anastomotic leakage (control group, n = 89) using the following criteria: age, sex, type of neoadjuvant treatment, and type of anastomosis. The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Quality of Life Questionnaire for Colorectal Cancer were submitted to all included patients. The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome scores were categorized into 3 categories (no Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, minor Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, and major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome). RESULTS: Mean follow-up after stoma closure was 46 ± 26 months. Median (interquartile range) Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score for all included patients was 27 (16-36). Patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage had impaired Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score: median 30 (23-39) vs 27 (15-34) in the control group (P = .02), with no Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in 4% (vs 31%), minor Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in 52% (vs 52%), and major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in 44% (vs 17%) (P = .004). No difference was noted between the asymptomatic anastomotic leakage group and control group for median Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score (P = .70) and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome categories (no Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, minor LARS, and major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; P = .58). Patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage had significantly more anorectal and urinary symptoms compared with patients with no or asymptomatic anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage impairs function and quality of life after laparoscopic, sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer.

Complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect quality of life and surgeon-patient relationship.

AIM: This multicentric prospective study aimed to investigate how postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect patients' quality of life and satisfaction with care. METHOD: One hundred and sixteen patients operated on for colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients answered three questionnaires about generic (EORTC QLQ-C30) and disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR29) quality of life and treatment satisfaction (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) at the time of admission and at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Non-parametric tests and linear multiple regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients had complications requiring further surgery (anastomotic leakage, abdominal bleeding, abdominal wall sepsis, wound infection). Patients with complications that required surgery reported a worse score of physical function, emotional function and anxiety than patients without such complications 1 month after surgery. These patients judged their general satisfaction with the quality of care and doctors' interpersonal skills, technical skills, information provision and availability to be worse than in patients without such complications. The presence of postoperative psychiatric complications and anastomotic leakage were independent predictors of quality of life (ß = -0.30, P = 0.004, and ß = -0.42, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, complications requiring any kind of surgical management significantly affected patients' perception of all doctor-related items suggesting an impairment of the entire surgeon-patient relationship. Convincing patients that 'zero risk' cannot be achieved in surgical practice is therefore a priority.

Do anastomotic leaks impair postoperative health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery? A case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks after colorectal resections for cancer are a leading cause of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long hospital stay. Few data exist on the potentially deleterious effect of the anastomotic leaks after proctectomy for cancer on patient health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of clinically evident anastomotic leaks on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer excision. DESIGN: This is a case-matched study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a Greek academic surgical department. PATIENTS: Included were 25 patients undergoing low anterior resection complicated by an anastomotic leak (Clavien classification II, n = 14, and III, n = 11) and 50 patients undergoing low anterior resection with an uncomplicated course. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality-of-life data were prospectively collected at fixed assessment time points (baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively) by the use of validated questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CR29). RESULTS: "Leak" patients required a longer hospitalization. Although the numbers of initially constructed defunctioning loop ileostomies were not significantly different between cases and controls, "leak" patients were required to remain with a stoma significantly more often at all postoperative assessment time points. No differences were observed in the baseline scores between the 2 groups. Physical function of "leak" patients was significantly worse at all postoperative assessment time points. At 6 and 12 months, their emotional and social function and overall quality-of-life scores were significantly decreased in comparison with the patients with an uncomplicated course. "Leak" patients experienced significantly more "stoma-related problems" and "sore skin" around the stoma site. LIMITATIONS: Limited number of patients, restriction of follow-up to the end of the first year, and heterogeneity in terms of the presentation, severity, and management of anastomotic leaks were the limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leaks have an adverse effect on postoperative health-related quality of life.

Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is suspected to alter function. However, very few reports have been devoted to this problem. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of AL on function and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic TME for cancer. METHODS: A total of 170 patients who underwent laparoscopic TME and sphincter-saving surgery for mid and low rectal cancer were included (67 % after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). Twenty-one patients with AL were assessed for function and QoL (Short Form 36 (SF-36), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL), CR-29, and Wexner's score) at the most recent follow-up. These patients were matched to 42 patients without AL according to sex, body mass index, ypTNM, radiotherapy, and type of anastomosis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30 months, AL significantly impaired physical activity (SF-36) (p = 0.004), self-respect (FIQL) (p = 0.029), wear pad's score (Wexner's score) (p = 0.043), and blood and mucus in stool score (CR-29) (p = 0.001). Overall Wexner's score did not show any significant difference in the two groups, 8.9 in AL patients vs. 11.6 in patients without AL (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: AL significantly impairs both functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME for rectal cancer. However, the observed difference was only limited, leading to similar outcomes on most of the tested scores. Patients with AL should be warned that if they initially experience severely impaired results, outcomes tend with time to become similar to those observed in noncomplicated patients.

Quality of life of older rectal cancer patients is not impaired by a permanent stoma.

BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to investigate the impact of a stoma on the HRQL with a special focus on age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2007 in 4 hospitals were identified. All patients underwent TME surgery. Survivors were approached to complete the SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-C38 questionnaires. HRQL scores of the four groups, stratified by stoma status (stoma/no stoma) and age at operation (<70 and ≥ 70), were compared. The SF-36 and the QLQ-CR38 sexuality subscale scores of the survivors were compared with an age- and sex-matched Dutch norm population. RESULTS: Median follow-up of 143 patients was 3.4 years. Elderly had significantly worse physical function (p = 0.0003) compared to younger patients. Elderly (p = 0.005) and patients without a stoma (p = 0.009) had worse sexual functioning compared to younger patients and patients with a stoma. Older males showed more sexual dysfunction (p = 0.01) when compared to younger males. In comparison with the normative population, elderly with a stoma had worse physical function (p < 0.01), but slightly better mental health (p < 0.05). Elderly without a stoma had better emotional role function (p < 0.01), and younger patients had worse sexual functioning and enjoyment (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with a stoma have comparable HRQL to older patients without a stoma or the normative population, indicating the feasibility of a permanent stoma for elderly patients with a low situated rectal carcinoma. The negative impact of treatment on sexual functioning as found in the current study calls for further attention to alleviate this problem in sexually active patients.

[Ways to improve the quality of life of elderly and senile patients after the operation by Brikker].

The present study is devoted to improving quality of life of patients in elderly and senile age after operation of Bricker by finding the optimal method of forming ureterointestinal anastomosis. From 2007 to 2009 103 patients of elderly and senile age with diseases requiring removal of the bladder were treated in the Lenigrad Regional Oncology Centre. All the patients were made cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: In 1st group, the ureterointestinal anastomosis was formed a classical way "end to side" described Bricker, in the 2nd group ureterointestinal anastomosis was performed by the method of Wallace - "common area". Pathological conditions developed in patients in late postoperative period were as follows: hydronephrosis in early and later stages, obstructive pyelonephritis, frequent attacks of chronic pyelonephritis, chronic renal failure, urinary fistula. Formation of ureterointestinal anastomosis by Wallace during surgery reduces the amount of later postoperative complications. Quality of life was better after the formation of ureterointestinal anastomosis by Wallace.