Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 30(3): 408-413, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30465376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: WHO MCS in 2011 evaluated the incidence and management strategies linked with maternal and neonatal mortality in facilities across 26 countries including Pakistan. This study, a sub-analysis assessed the availability of essential obstetric and newborn care at referral level facilities of Pakistan that were selected for WHO MCS to correlate it with maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed the infrastructure, equipment and services in 16 referral level government hospitals participating in WHO MCS from 1st March to 30th May, 2011. The association was found between this data and maternal & neonatal outcomes of each facility using chi square test. RESULTS: The studied facilities had basic infrastructure, most components of Essential Maternal and Neonatal Obstetric Care services with part time/full time availability of obstetricians, anaesthetists and paediatricians. Adult intensive care unit was available in 68%, and neonatal intensive care unit was available in half of the facilities. The incidence of severe maternal outcomes had a positive correlation with presence of adult intensive care unit, mechanical ventilator and twenty-four hours (24/7) availability of anaesthesiologist, nurses & paramedics. The neonatal mortality was also higher in facilities with neonatal intensive care unit facility. CONCLUSIONS: Most components of Essential Maternal and Neonatal Obstetric Care were present in the studied facilities. Tertiary level facilities even with availability of Adult and neonatal intensive care units had more adverse maternal and new-born outcomes perhaps due to more disease burden.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/supply & distribution , Maternal-Child Health Services/supply & distribution , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality , Maternal-Child Health Services/organization & administration , Maternal-Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Pakistan , Pediatricians/supply & distribution , Perinatal Mortality , Pregnancy , Secondary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , World Health Organization
2.
Anesth Analg ; 126(4): 1291-1297, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547423

ABSTRACT

The majority of the world's population lacks access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical care. Although there is a health workforce crisis across the board in the poorest countries in the world, anesthesia is disproportionally affected. This article explores some of the key issues that must be tackled to strengthen the anesthesia workforce in low- and lower-middle-income countries. First, we need to increase the overall number of safe anesthesia providers to match a huge burden of disease, particularly in the poorest countries in the world and in remote and rural areas. Through using a task-sharing model, an increase is required in both nonphysician anesthesia providers and anesthesia specialists. Second, there is a need to improve and support the competency of anesthesia providers overall. It is important to include a broad base of knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to manage complex and high-risk patients and to lead improvements in the quality of care. Third, there needs to be a concerted effort to encourage interprofessional skills and the aspects of working and learning together with colleagues in a complex surgical ecosystem. Finally, there has to be a focus on developing a workforce that is resilient to burnout and the challenges of an overwhelming clinical burden and very restricted resources. This is essential for anesthesia providers to stay healthy and effective and necessary to reduce the inevitable loss of human resources through migration and cessation of professional practice. It is vital to realize that all of these issues need to be tackled simultaneously, and none neglected, if a sustainable and scalable solution is to be achieved.


Subject(s)
Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Developing Countries , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Workforce , Anesthetists/economics , Anesthetists/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Career Choice , Clinical Competence , Cooperative Behavior , Developing Countries/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Needs Assessment , Patient Care Team
3.
Anesth Analg ; 126(4): 1298-1304, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547424

ABSTRACT

There are inadequate numbers of anesthesia providers in many parts of the world. Good quality educational programs are needed to increase provider numbers, train leaders and teachers, and increase knowledge and skills. In some countries, considerable external support may be required to develop self-sustaining programs. There are some key themes related to educational programs in low- and middle-income countries:(1) Programs must be appropriate for the local environment-there is no "one-size-fits-all" program. In some countries, nonuniversity programs may be appropriate for training providers.(2) It is essential to train local teachers-a number of short courses provide teacher training. Overseas attachments may also play an important role in developing leadership and teaching capacity.(3) Interactive teaching techniques, such as small-group discussions and simulation, have been incorporated into many educational programs. Computer learning and videoconferencing offer additional educational possibilities.(4) Subspecialty education in areas such as obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, and pain management are needed to develop leadership and increase capacity in subspecialty areas of practice. Examples include short subspecialty courses and clinical fellowships.(5) Collaboration and coordination are vital. Anesthesiologists need to work with ministries of health and other organizations to develop plans that are matched to need. External organizations can play an important role.(6) Excellent education is required at all levels. Training guidelines could help to standardize and improve training. Resources should be available for research, as well as monitoring and evaluation of educational programs.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Anesthetists/education , Developing Countries , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Anesthesiology/economics , Anesthetists/economics , Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Developing Countries/economics , Education, Medical, Continuing/economics , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Specialization
4.
Anesth Analg ; 126(4): 1305-1311, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547425

ABSTRACT

There is an urgent need to train more anesthesia providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is also a need to provide more educational opportunities in subspecialty areas of anesthetic practice such as trauma management, pain management, obstetric anesthesia, and pediatric anesthesia. Together, these subspecialty areas make up a large proportion of the clinical workload in LMICs. In these countries, the quality of education may be variable, there may be few teachers, and opportunities for continued learning and mentorship are rare. Short subspecialty courses such as Primary Trauma Care, Essential Pain Management, Safer Anaesthesia From Education-Obstetric Anaesthesia, and Safer Anaesthesia From Education-Paediatric Anaesthesia have been developed to help fill this need. They have the potential for immediate impact by providing an opportunity for continuing professional development and relevant subspecialty training. These courses are all short (1-3 days), are presented as an off-the-shelf package, and include a teach-the-teacher component. They use a variety of interactive teaching techniques and are designed to be adaptable and responsive to local needs. There is an emphasis on local ownership of the educational process that helps to promote sustainability. After an initial financial outlay to purchase equipment, the costs are relatively low. Short subspecialty courses appear to be part of the educational answer in LMICs, but there is a need for research to validate their role.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Anesthetists/education , Developing Countries , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Specialization , Anesthesiology/economics , Anesthetists/economics , Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Developing Countries/economics , Education, Medical, Continuing/economics , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Specialization/economics
5.
Anesth Analg ; 126(4): 1312-1320, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29547426

ABSTRACT

The safety of anesthesia characteristic of high-income countries today is not matched in low-resource settings with poor infrastructure, shortages of anesthesia providers, essential drugs, equipment, and supplies. Health care is delivered through complex systems. Achieving sustainable widespread improvement globally will require an understanding of how to influence such systems. Health outcomes depend not only on a country's income, but also on how resources are allocated, and both vary substantially, between and within countries. Safety is particularly important in anesthesia because anesthesia is intrinsically hazardous and not intrinsically therapeutic. Nevertheless, other elements of the quality of health care, notably access, must also be considered. More generally, there are certain prerequisites within society for health, captured in the Jakarta declaration. It is necessary to have adequate infrastructure (notably for transport and primary health care) and hospitals capable of safely carrying out the "Bellwether Procedures" (cesarean delivery, laparotomy, and the treatment of compound fractures). Surgery, supported by safe anesthesia, is critical to the health of populations, but avoidable harm from health care (including very high mortality rates from anesthesia in many parts of the world) is a major global problem. Thus, surgical and anesthesia services must not only be provided, they must be safe. The global anesthesia workforce crisis is a major barrier to achieving this. Many anesthetics today are administered by nonphysicians with limited training and little access to supervision or support, often working in very challenging circumstances. Many organizations, notably the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists, are working to improve access to and safety of anesthesia and surgery around the world. Challenges include collaboration with local stakeholders, coordination of effort between agencies, and the need to influence national health policy makers to achieve sustainable improvement. It is conceivable that safe anesthesia and perioperative care could be provided for essential surgical services today by clinicians with moderate levels of training using relatively simple (but appropriately designed and maintained) equipment and a limited number of inexpensive generic medications. However, there is a minimum standard for these resources, below which reasonable safety cannot be assured. This minimum (at least) should be available to all. Not only more resources, but also more equitable distribution of existing resources is required. Thus, the starting point for global access to safe anesthesia is acceptance that access to health care in general should be a basic human right everywhere.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Anesthetics/therapeutic use , Anesthetists , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Developing Countries , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/economics , Anesthesiology/economics , Anesthesiology/education , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Anesthetics/economics , Anesthetics/supply & distribution , Anesthetists/economics , Anesthetists/education , Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Developing Countries/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Hum Resour Health ; 15(1): 77, 2017 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29115962

ABSTRACT

Task sharing, the involvement of non-specialists (non-physician clinicians or non-specialist physicians) in performing tasks originally reserved for surgeons and anesthesiologists, can be a potent strategy in bridging the vast human resource gap in surgery and anesthesia and bringing needed surgical care to the district level especially in low-resource countries. Although a common practice, the idea of assigning advanced tasks to less-specialized workers remains a subject of controversy. In order to optimize its benefits, it is helpful to understand the current task sharing landscape, its challenges, and its promise. We performed a literature review of PubMed, EMBASE, and gray literature sources for articles published between January 1, 1996, and August 1, 2016, written in English, with a focus on task sharing in surgery or anesthesia in low-resource countries. Gray literature sources are defined as articles produced outside of a peer-reviewed journal. We sought data on the nature and forms of task sharing (non-specialist cadres involved, surgical/anesthesia procedures shared, approaches to training and supervision, and regulatory and other efforts to create a supportive environment), impact of task sharing on delivery of surgical services (effect on access, acceptability, cost, safety, and quality), and challenges to successful implementation. We identified 40 published articles describing task sharing in surgery and anesthesia in 39 low-resource countries in Africa and Asia. All countries had a cadre of non-specialists providing anesthesia services, while 13 had cadres providing surgical services. Six countries had non-specialists performing major procedures, including Cesarean sections and open abdominal surgeries. While most cadres were recognized by their governments as service providers, very few had scopes of practice that included task sharing of surgery or anesthesia. Key challenges to effective task sharing include specialists' concern about safety, weak training strategies, poor or unclear career pathways, regulatory constraints, and service underutilization. Concrete recommendations are offered.


Subject(s)
Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Developing Countries , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Professional Role , Surgeons/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans
7.
Br J Nurs ; 25(20): 1123-1128, 2016 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27834523

ABSTRACT

Critical illness in the developing world is a substantial burden for individuals, families, communities and healthcare services. The management of these patients will depend on the resources available. Simple conditions such as a fractured leg or a strangulated hernia can have devastating effects on individuals, families and communities. The recent Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and the World Health Organization promise to strengthen emergency and essential care will increase the focus on surgical services within the developing world. This article provides an overview of nursing the critically ill surgical patient in Zambia, a lower middle income country (LMIC) in sub-Saharan Africa.


Subject(s)
Critical Care Nursing , Critical Illness/nursing , Developing Countries , Perioperative Nursing , Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Electric Power Supplies , Emergency Medical Services/supply & distribution , Health Resources , Humans , Infection Control , Nurses, International , Pain Management , Zambia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...