An Overview of Hereditary Angioedema for the Primary Care Physician.

Hereditary angioedema is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by episodes of swelling of the upper airway, intestines, and skin. The disorder is characterized by deficiency in C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) or a decrease in functional C1-INH. Treatment options include on demand therapy (treatment of acute attacks), long-term prophylaxis, and short-term prophylaxis. Corticosteroids, epinephrine, and antihistamines are not effective for this form of angioedema. The high mortality in patients undiagnosed underscores a need for broader physician awareness to identify these patients and initiate therapy.

Anesthetic management with remimazolam for a patient with hereditary angioedema:a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE), a genetic disorder caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction, may cause mucosal edema in the upper airway during tracheal intubation and extubation. CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old man with HAE and a history of laryngeal edema, scheduled to undergo cervical laminoplasty under general anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced by continuous injection of remimazolam and remifentanil, during which manual mask ventilation and intubation were performed without difficulty. The patient was extubated under deep anesthesia. After emergence from general anesthesia, he had no significant upper airway edema and was treated with a C1-inhibitor seven hours post-surgery because of slight tongue swelling. No additional airway edema was observed, and the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit the following day. CONCLUSIONS: Deep anesthesia tracheal extubation with remimazolam may be effective in preventing upper airway edema during anesthetic management in patients with HAE. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 184-186, February, 2024.

Hereditary angioedema with normal C1 esterase inhibitor: Current paradigms and clinical dilemmas.

Background: A diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (HAE-nl-C1-INH) can be challenging and pharmacologic management is not well defined. Objective: The objective was to discuss practical considerations in the clinical management of HAE-nl-C1-INH by using illustrative clinical vignettes to highlight and/or address select challenges. Methods: This was a narrative review. Results: Symptoms of HAE-nl-C1-INH overlap with HAE types I and II; the heterogeneity of presentation and symptom burden are diagnostic challenges. A patient history, with particular attention to whether urticaria or other symptoms of mast cell mediator release are present, is important because such symptoms would strongly suggest a mast cell-mediated pathway. A family history of angioedema is informative but a lack thereof does not rule out diagnosis. Expected laboratory findings would be normal for C4, C1-INH level and function, and Complement 1q; a genetic mutational analysis may be helpful, but current assays do not include all known mutations; most cases are categorized as unknown. To align with guideline-directed treatment approaches, the following stepwise approach is suggested for suspected HAE-nl-C1-INH: (1) thoroughly investigate the possibility of response to histaminergic and/or mast cell-targeting treatments; (2) if patients with normal C4, C1-INH level and/or function fail adequate trials with histamine/mast cell-directed therapy or have a mutation that suggests bradykinin pathway involvement, follow HAE type I and II treatment guidelines. Response to medications approved for HAE types I/II provides compelling support for a high clinical suspicion of HAE-nl-C1-INH. De-labeling an HAE-nl-C1-INH diagnosis may be appropriate if the initial diagnosis was made without adequate evaluation or if new information and/or testing indicates that the patient does not actually have HAE. Conclusion: Key unmet needs in HAE-nl-C1-INH include lack of confirmatory biomarker(s) for diagnosis and lack of prospective controlled clinical studies of pharmacologic products in this patient population.

Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema attack prevention: long-term efficacy, quality of life, and safety data from a phase 2, randomised, open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Garadacimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting activated factor XII. This study evaluated long-term efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety data for garadacimab in adults with hereditary angioedema. METHODS: This global phase 2 study comprised a treatment period 1 (TP1: 12 weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and a treatment period 2 (TP2: ≥44-week open-label extension). Patients aged 18-65 years with clinically confirmed hereditary angioedema were eligible. In TP1, 32 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous garadacimab (75 mg, 200 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks (once monthly). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology via block randomisation (block sizes 1-4). Subsequently, six additional patients in TP1 were assigned to open-label garadacimab 400 mg every 2 weeks. At the start of TP2, patients were re-randomised (if receiving placebo, garadacimab 75 mg, or garadacimab 400 mg) or continued to receive garadacimab 200 mg or garadacimab 600 mg once monthly. After a protocol amendment on March 20, 2020, patients originally assigned to the 600 mg dose were down-titrated to 200 mg at their next visit. The primary endpoint (published previously) was monthly attack rate for patients receiving 200 mg or 600 mg garadacimab in TP1 in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we assessed the impact of garadacimab on patient-reported and investigator-reported outcomes and HRQoL as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03712228, and is completed. FINDINGS: Of 54 patients screened between Oct 29, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 32 randomised and six open-label patients completed TP1 and entered TP2 (20 in the garadacimab 200 mg group; 18 in the garadacimab 600 mg group; total 38 patients). Median age was 39·0 years (IQR 27·0-53·0), and 21 patients (55%) were female and 17 (45%) were male. In TP2, the median garadacimab exposure was 87·9 weeks (IQR 50·0-106·6) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 44·1 weeks (24·1-56·1) in the garadacimab 600 mg group. Median monthly attack rates were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·1) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 0·1 (0·0-0·4) in the garadacimb 600 mg group. Median reduction in monthly attack rate versus run-in was 100% (IQR 98-100) with garadacimab 200 mg. HRQoL improvements observed during TP1 with garadacimab were sustained throughout TP2. TP2 safety signals were consistent with TP1. Two patients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-related). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were headache (nine of 38, 24%) and abdominal pain (seven of 38, 18%). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Once-monthly garadacimab for more than 2 years in patients with hereditary angioedema was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing monthly attack rate and improving HRQoL. These results reveal the potential of long-term prophylactic treatment with 200 mg once-monthly garadacimab towards complete disease control of patients with hereditary angioedema. FUNDING: CSL Behring.

The real life experience goes on: update after 4 years on the first cohort treated with lanadelumab at our center.

Introduction: Lanadelumab is a first-line long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). Real-life data on its long-term efficacy and safety are limited. It is unknown whether patients using lanadelumab need short-term prophylaxis (STP). Objectives: To provide 4-year follow-up data for our first 34 patients treating with lanadelumab. Methods: Patients were assessed for their current injection interval, attacks, treatment satisfaction, disease control (AECT), quality of life impairment (AE-QoL), events that can induce attacks, and the use of STP since the start of their treatment with lanadelumab. Results: Of 34 patients who started lanadelumab treatment, 32 were still using it after 4 years, with a median injection interval of 33 (range 14-90) days. HAE patients (n=28) reported longer intervals, i.e. 35 (14-90) days, than patients with angioedema due to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (n=4, 23 (14-31) days). With their current injection intervals, used for a mean duration of 29 ± 17 months, patients reported a yearly attack rate of 0.3 ± 0.1. More than 70% of patients were attack-free since starting their current injection interval. All patients reported well-controlled disease, i.e. ≥10 points in the AECT; 21 patients had complete control (16 points). AE-QoL scores improved further compared to our initial report, most prominently in the fears/shame domain (-6 points). Treatment satisfaction was very high. No angioedema occurred after 146 of 147 potentially attack-inducing medical procedures without STP. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in real-life and question the need for STP in patients who use effective LTP.

[Case series of hereditary angioedema patients and use of tranexamic acid treatments in prophylaxis and acute crisis, experience in Perú]. / Serie de casos de pacientes con angioedema hereditario y uso de ácido tranexámico como tratamiento profiláctico, y en crisis agudas: experiencia en Perú.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by episodes of swelling, HAE crisis could cause death by suffocation, and also affect the quality of life in these patients. There exists an important disparity of HAE specific treatments between countries, inclusive in the same region, currently in Perú we use moderate and high doses of Tranexamic Acid (TA) in prophylaxis therapy and in acute HAE crisis respectively. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with TA in three types of HAE patients and be a guide to other countries with this therapy, where HAE specific treatments are not registered. CASE REPORT: Patient 1: Woman. 49 years old. HAE-1. Symptoms began at the age of 12. Her final diagnosis was at age 45. Usually presents an acute crisis every two months approximately, she receives 2 g IV of TA when lips, tongue, facial episodes is beginning, eventually she needed other 1 - 2 g IV (after 4 hours). She receives Long-Term Prophylaxis (LTP) with TA (500 - 750 mg)/12 h. Patient 2: Woman 47 years old, HAE nC1INH-FXII. Symptoms began at the age of 19, during her first pregnancy, her definitive diagnosis was at the age of 41 years. She maintains a prophylaxis treatment of TA (750 mg-1,5 g)/daily; upper airway attacks are treated immediately with TA doses (1 - 2 g) when the crisis is beginning. Patient 3: Woman 43 years old, HAE-nC1INH-U. Genetic study did not recognize SERPING1, PLG1, ANGPT1, KNG1, FXII, mutations. Symptoms began at age 4, and her final diagnosis was at age 36. When the attack is beginning, she immediately receives TA (500 - 750 mg) orally / 12 hours during 2 to 3 days with acceptable tolerance and control of the HAE episodes. While the patients receive TA prophylaxis treatment doses (500 - 750 mg) every 8 or 12 hours respectively, the HAE episodes are less symptomatic and resolve in a few days. CONCLUSIONS: We found this systematic review, used TA orally, on-demand and prophylaxis therapy, maximum cumulative dose 3 g/24 h1. In our HAE patients, we used TA up to 4 g (2 g - 2 g) intravenous for control of acute crisis in a interval of 4 hours, when decreases the reaction, the orally maintenance dose should be prescribed, 1 g/8 h with a progressive decrease of the dose in the next days. Tranexamic Acid treatment was useful in our different types of HAE patients. Most of our patients use high doses of TA to slow down and stop slowly the HAE crisis. TA is probably an option in countries where specific treatments are not registered, it could be administered orally and/or intravenous. High doses of TA were well tolerated and with acceptable response in HAE attacks.

ANTECEDENTES: El Angioedema Hereditario (AEH) se caracteriza por episodios de hinchazón a niveles cutáneo y submucoso, una crisis podría causar muerte por asfixia. Además, afecta la calidad de vida de las personas que la padecen. Existe una disparidad importante de medicamentos específicos para el AEH entre países, inclusive en nuestra misma región. En Perú donde no son viables estos tratamientos, se utiliza el Ácido Tranexámico (AT) para las Profilaxis de Largo y Corto Plazo (PLP / PCP), y para las crisis agudas de AEH. OBJETIVO: Reportar la experiencia con el tratamiento de AT en tres tipos de pacientes con AEH, para que pueda ser usada como referencia en otros países en los que aún no se cuenta con medicamentos específicos para la enfermedad. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente 1: Mujer de 49 años, AEH Tipo 1. Inició síntomas a los 12 años de edad. Diagnóstico definitivo a los 45 años. Actualmente, presenta crisis cada dos meses. Se le administran dosis de 2 g por IV de AT, cuando empieza crisis en cara, lengua y labios. Eventualmente ha necesitado entre 1 y 2 g por IV (después de cuatro horas), ella recibe PLP con AT (500 ­ 750 mg) cada 12 horas. Paciente 2: Mujer de 47 años, AEH-nC1INH-FXII. Inició síntomas a los 19 años durante su primer embarazo. Diagnóstico definitivo a los 41 años. Ella mantiene PLP con AT (750 mg ­ 1,5 g) diariamente. Los ataques de vía respiratoria alta son tratados inmediatamente con AT cuando la crisis inicia, con dosis de 1 a 2 g por IV. Paciente 3: Mujer de 43 años, AEH-nC1INH-D. Estudio genético no detecta mutación en SERPING1, PLG1, ANGPT1, KNG1 y FXII. Inició síntomas a los 4 años. Diagnóstico definitivo a los 36 años. Al iniciar las crisis, se administra AT por VO, entre 500 a 750 mg/12 horas durante dos o tres días con aceptable respuesta y tolerancia a los episodios de AEH. Mientras las pacientes reciban dosis de mantenimiento de AT, entre 500 y 750 mg cada 8 o 12 horas, las crisis suelen ser de menor intensidad y se resuelven en menos días. CONCLUSIONES: En esta revisión sistemática, utilizaron AT vía oral, a demanda y en tratamiento profiláctico, dosis máxima acumulada 3 g/24 h1. En nuestros pacientes con AEH, hemos utilizado AT hasta 4 g vía intravenosa en un intervalo de cuatro horas (2 g - 2 g); para el control de crisis agudas, cuando la reacción está cediendo, prescribimos la dosis de mantenimiento, 1 g/8 h con disminución progresiva de la dosis en los días siguientes. El tratamiento con ácido tranexámico ha sido de utilidad en nuestros pacientes con los distintos tipos de AEH. La mayoría de ellos utilizan altas dosis de AT para disminuir lentamente las crisis agudas de AEH. Se puede administrar vía oral o intravenosa. Es un medicamento que puede ser de ayuda en países donde no se tiene registro de tratamientos específicos para la enfermedad. Las dosis de AT han sido bien toleradas y con una respuesta aceptable en las crisis de estos pacientes con AEH.

The Disease Burden of Hereditary Angioedema: Insights from a Survey in French-Canadians from Quebec.

Background: Limited data are available on the clinical profile and disease burden of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in Canadians. Objective: This study aimed to assess HAE disease characteristics and the burden of disease in Canadians with HAE types I, II, and normal levels of C1 inhibitor (nC1-INH). Materials and Methods: A 46-item patient survey evaluating clinical characteristics and burden of disease was developed and disseminated by the HAE patient organization Angio-oédeme héréditaire du Québec in Quebec, Canada, from May 2019 to February 2020. The survey received Research Review Board ethics approval. Results: In the 35 respondents, HAE type I was the most common (46%), followed by nC1-INH (43%). Female participants were significantly younger at first symptom presentation than males (p=0.04). Prior to diagnosis, 69% of participants underwent unnecessary treatments and procedures, with a 10-year delay between first symptoms and diagnosis. Before starting the current treatment, 42% of participants experienced weekly HAE attacks. Most participants identified experiencing attacks in the abdomen (89%), followed by the larynx (66%), feet (66%), hands (63%), and face (63%). Most attacks were severe or moderate, yet almost half of patients waited >1 hr before getting medical attention at their last emergency department (ED) visit. HAE was associated with decreased health-related quality of life, leading to significant functional impairment in personal and professional life. As compared to HAE type I/II, patients with HAE nC1-INH were treated more often with tranexamic acid for long-term prophylaxis, and their condition was less controlled, resulting in more attacks and ED visits. Conclusion: HAE manifests in this patient population as frequent moderate-to-severe attacks and a high disease burden; the HAE subtype may differentially affect care requirements. There is an urgent need for increased awareness and education on HAE among treating physicians.

Berotralstat in hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency: first real-world evidence from a Canadian center.

Background: Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency is a rare genetic condition that causes recurrent swelling with consequent functional impairment and decreased quality of life. Long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent angioedema episodes is a key component of disease management. Berotralstat, an oral, once-daily plasma kallikrein inhibitor, was approved for LTP by Health Canada in 2022. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, real-world study investigating the effectiveness and adverse effects of berotralstat. Data on angioedema frequency, disease control, and adverse events were tabulated. Patient satisfaction with treatment was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing very unsatisfied and 5 representing very satisfied with therapy. Results: From June, 2022 and May, 2023, 8 patients with HAE type 1 or type 2 received berotralstat. Effectiveness data were available for 7 patients who continued the drug for at least 3 months, 4 of whom switched to berotralstat from plasma-derived C1 inhibitor LTP. In these 7 patients, the average number of attacks per month decreased from 3.3 to 1.6 (p<0.05), representing a ~52% reduction in attack frequency. Median angioedema control test score numerically improved from 8 to 13 (p=0.0781). Of the 8 patients who received berotralstat, 3 reported no adverse effects and 5 experienced gastrointestinal side effects, which were mild and transient in 3 and led to discontinuation in 1. Average treatment satisfaction was between satisfied and very satisfied at 4.3. Conclusion: Berotralstat is an effective agent for long-term prophylaxis in HAE. Most patients experienced no adverse effects or mild, transient gastrointestinal symptoms.

Kallikrein inhibitors for angioedema: the progress of preclinical and early phase studies.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent edema and predominantly caused by the dysregulation of the kinin-kallikrein system. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript presents the results of preclinical and early clinical trials of newer drugs targeting the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system. ATN-249 is an oral drug that has shown promising results in preclinical and Phase I studies, and good tolerability in the prophylactic treatment of attacks. KVD900 is also an oral agent developed for the on-demand treatment of HAE attacks. It has shown positive results in Phase I/II studies, with rapid absorption. The third drug, IONIS-PKKRx, is an antisense oligonucleotide targeting plasma prekallikrein mRNA. It has shown a dose-dependent reduction of plasma prekallikrein levels and proenzyme activation in Phase I/II studies, and has shown promising results. STAR-0215 is a long acting anti-activated kallikrein monoclonal antibody. A Phase 1a single ascending dose trial evaluated its safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Lastly, NTLA-2002 is an investigational gene-editing therapy. EXPERT OPINION: The targeted treatment of the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system with specific inhibitors is promising for the prevention of angioedema attacks. Ongoing phase III studies will provide further insight into the efficacy and long-term safety of these novel therapies, potentially expanding treatment options for HAE treatment.

Repeated attacks of hereditary angioedema in pediatric female.

A 16-year-old female presented to an outpatient clinic with a 13-year history of recurrent episodes of abdominal pain, vomiting and mild cutaneous swelling, either spontaneously or following minor trauma. The episodes occurred every 1-2 months. There was no family history of a similar complaint or hereditary angio-oedema (HAE). At the age of 16, evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of HAE type II, characterised by low C4 levels and reduced C1 esterase inhibitor function. The patient was prescribed tranexamic acid 1 g twice daily as well as C1 esterase inhibitor used as rescue medication during symptomatic episodes. This case report emphasises the importance of considering a diagnosis of HAE in patients with recurrent, unexplained abdominal pain, even in the absence of a positive family history of HAE.Abbreviations: ANA Antinuclear antibodies; C1-INH C1-inhibitor; CBC Complete blood count; FMF Familial Mediterranean fever; HAE Hereditary angioedema; IBD Inflammatory bowel diseases; SDP Solvent detergent-treated plasma; SLE Lupus erythematosus.

Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor: Clinical and genetic characterization of 15 Portuguese unrelated families.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor (HAE-nC1-INH) is a rare genetic disease with similar phenotype to HAE-C1-INH but different genetic background. Currently, 6 subtypes are recognized, based on the underlying mutations. Several aspects need further clarification. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical features of patients with genetically characterized HAE-nC1-INH from the North of Portugal. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of clinical data from all patients with HAE-nC1-INH followed at a HAE Reference Center. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were identified, 4 with no family history. The FXII mutation Thr328Lys (38 carriers) was the most prevalent. There were 3 new potentially disease-causing variants linked to HAE-nC1-INH identified (c.529+4A>G:FXII; Cys248*:Kininogen-1; and Arg261His:Plasminogen). The HAE-FXII cohort included 82% females and 71.8% symptomatic patients. Penetrance rate was significantly higher in females (81.3% vs 28.6%; P = .012). A hormonal influence was observed in 96.2% of the symptomatic females, although 62.5% remained symptomatic after oral estrogen withdrawal. Trauma and dental procedures were frequent triggers (82.6% and 45.5%, respectively). Main locations were facial (described by 96%), lips (82.1%), and eyelids (64.3%). One patient reported erythema marginatum as prodrome. Plasma-derived C1-INH was effective as short-term prophylaxis in all treated patients, but only in 80% as on-demand treatment. Icatibant was effectively used on demand in 9 patients, but with relapses in 5 (57%). CONCLUSION: We described a large Portuguese series of patients with HAE-nC1-INH genetically characterized. Differences with others may contribute to improve current unmet needs and raise awareness of this rare disease. We highlighted the identification of 3 new variants (additional molecular studies are ongoing) and the report of erythema marginatum in HAE-nC1-INH.

Comorbidities in Angioedema Due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency: An Italian Survey.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency is characterized by unpredictable recurrent episodes of swelling affecting the skin and the mucosa tissues, including gastrointestinal tract and/or oropharyngeal-laryngeal mucosae. Long-term prophylaxis (LTP) is used to prevent attacks. OBJECTIVE: Because C1-INH plays a pivotal role in several biological pathways, we investigated the possible association of comorbidities with C1-INH deficiency and the use of LTP with attenuated androgens (AA) or tranexamic acid (TXA). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved adult patients with HAE referred to Milan and Padua angioedema centers in the period 1979-2021. A qualitative comparison was performed to analyze comorbidities versus general population. The incidence of comorbidities was evaluated during LTP with AA or TXA versus patients without LTP. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were studied. A greater prevalence among patients was found for heart diseases (9.6% vs 4.8%), acute myocardial infarction (5.6% vs 1.4%), hepatitis C virus infection (10.5% vs 2.5%), and appendectomy (15.9% vs 4.3%). In patients taking AA, a greater incidence was found for hypertension (22.8% vs 10.8%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.02), hypercholesterolemia (19.5% vs 5.3%; OR: 3.97), diabetes mellitus (5% vs 1.4%; OR: 3.21), hepatic angioma (4.4% vs 0.7%; OR: 8.35), and focal nodular hyperplasia (2.5% vs 0.4%; OR: 6.9). No association between TXA and comorbidities was found. CONCLUSION: In this large patient population with a rare disease followed for up to a 43-year period, we found a greater prevalence of comorbidities hitherto unreported in the literature and an association between comorbidities and LTP with AA.

Effect of lanadelumab on attack frequency and QoL in Japanese patients with hereditary angioedema: Report of five cases.

Lanadelumab, a recombinant human anti-kallikrein monoclonal antibody, is recommended as the first-line option for long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, the efficacy of lanadelumab and its effects on the quality of life (QoL) in Japanese HAE patients using real-world data have not been reported. Herein, we report the outcomes of five HAE patients who were treated with lanadelumab at two Japanese institutions. We retrospectively collected data on attack frequency and on-demand treatment frequency using an angioedema quality of life (AE-QoL) questionnaire. Our data corresponded to five Japanese HAE patients who started lanadelumab treatment: four with HAE due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (HAE-1) and one with HAE with a normal C1-inhibitor (HAE-nC1-INH). Two HAE-1 patients showed a reduction in both attacks and number of on-demand treatments. The other HAE-1 patients had an increase in the number of on-demand treatments, although there was no apparent reduction in attacks. The HAE-nC1-INH patient showed a slight increase in both attacks and number of on-demand treatments. Only one HAE-1 patient discontinued treatment after 1 month owing to side effects, including dizziness and headache. All four who continued treatment showed improved AE-QoL total and domain scores. Therefore, in this study, using real-world data, we demonstrated that lanadelumab reduced attack frequency and improved QoL in Japanese HAE patients.

Vision loss due to atypical bilateral edema of the optic nerve in a patient with hereditary angioedema: A case report.

PURPOSE: To describe a rare case of vision loss due to bilateral edema of the optic nerve in a patient with Hereditary Angioedema, treated with prophylactic C1-esterase inhibitor. METHODS: A 60-year-old Caucasian male affected by Hereditary Angioedema with unknown genetic defect (HAE- UNK) was admitted to our hospital presenting bilateral vision loss (best corrected visual acuity of 20/32 in the right eye and hand motion in the left eye) during an HAE attack. Intravenous administration of C1- esterase inhibitor (C1-INH, 1500 IU, Berinert, CSL Behring) determined the resolution of facial and periorbital swelling, however visual impairment persisted, in contrast with previous attacks experienced by the patient. Fundus examination revealed a vital optic disc without papilledema in both eyes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and orbits showed bilateral edema of the optic nerve sheath. Treatment with intravenous and oral steroids was ineffective. Subsequently, a prophylactic treatment strategy with subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor was started (7000 IU every four days). RESULTS: Complete regression of edema of the optic nerves was observed by imaging at two months of follow-up after chronic treatment with C1-esterase inhibitor (7000 IU every four days). Complete restoration of visual acuity was achieved (BCVA 20/20 in both eyes) and multimodal imaging of the optic nerves demonstrated the absence of anatomical and functional damage. CONCLUSION: Patients affected by HAE may show atypical presentation with edema of the optic nerves without involvement of the optic nerve head. They may significantly benefit from prophylactic and chronic treatment with C1-esterase inhibitor.

CRISPR-Cas9 In Vivo Gene Editing of KLKB1 for Hereditary Angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema is a rare genetic disease that leads to severe and unpredictable swelling attacks. NTLA-2002 is an in vivo gene-editing therapy based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9. NTLA-2002 targets the gene encoding kallikrein B1 (KLKB1), with the goal of lifelong control of angioedema attacks after a single dose. METHODS: In this phase 1 dose-escalation portion of a combined phase 1-2 trial of NTLA-2002 in adults with hereditary angioedema, we administered NTLA-2002 at a single dose of 25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg. The primary end points were the safety and side-effect profile of NTLA-2002 therapy. Secondary and exploratory end points included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy determined on the basis of investigator-confirmed angioedema attacks. RESULTS: Three patients received 25 mg of NTLA-2002, four received 50 mg, and three received 75 mg. At all dose levels, the most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions and fatigue. No dose-limiting toxic effects, serious adverse events, grade 3 or higher adverse events, or clinically important laboratory findings were observed after the administration of NTLA-2002. Dose-dependent reductions in the total plasma kallikrein protein level were observed between baseline and the latest assessment, with a mean percentage change of -67% in the 25-mg group, -84% in the 50-mg group, and -95% in the 75-mg group. The mean percentage change in the number of angioedema attacks per month between baseline and weeks 1 through 16 (primary observation period) was -91% in the 25-mg group, -97% in the 50-mg group, and -80% in the 75-mg group. Among all the patients, the mean percentage change in the number of angioedema attacks per month from baseline through the latest assessment was -95%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, a single dose of NTLA-2002 led to robust, dose-dependent, and durable reductions in total plasma kallikrein levels, and no severe adverse events were observed. In exploratory analyses, reductions in the number of angioedema attacks per month were observed at all dose levels. (Funded by Intellia Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05120830.).

Summary and future of medicine for hereditary angioedema.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal genetic disease for which there are currently nine FDA-approved drugs. This review summarizes drug treatments for HAE based on four therapeutic pathways: inhibiting the contact system, inhibiting bradykinin binding to B2 receptors, supplying missing C1 inhibitors, and inhibiting plasminogen conversion. The review generalizes the clinical use, pharmacological effects and mechanisms of HAE drugs, and it also discusses possible development directions and targets to enhance understanding of HAE and help researchers.

Patient-level indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab versus pdC1-INH i.v. in hereditary angioedema patients: PATCH study.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease in which patients suffer from local attacks primarily affecting skin and gastrointestinal tract, and sometimes even the upper respiratory tract leading to asphyxiation. Since head-to-head trials between authorized treatments are lacking, this study compares efficacy and safety of lanadelumab and intravenous plasma-derived C1-esterase inhibitor (pdC1-INH i.v.) in HAE patients on long-term prophylaxis by means of an indirect treatment comparison. METHODS: Efficacy and safety of lanadelumab against pdC1-INH i.v. were analyzed in a fully prespecified indirect comparison based on individual patient data (n = 231) from the HELP and CHANGE clinical trials. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were compared using a generalized linear model for count data. Confounding variables were identified a priori via systematic literature research and validated by clinical experts. Adjustment of confounders was implemented using a conditional regression model. RESULTS: Lanadelumab showed a statistically significant improvement in reduction of HAE attack rates compared to pdC1-INH i.v. across multiple endpoints: Monthly attack rate of patients treated with lanadelumab was less than half compared to pdC1-INH i.v. (Rate ratio: 0.486; 95% CI: 0.253, 0.932). Monthly rate of laryngeal attacks was found to be five times lower for lanadelumab (Rate ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.044, 0.915) and monthly rate of acute treated HAE attacks among lanadelumab patients was about one third of the attack rate of pdC1-INH i.v. patients (Rate ratio: 0.366; 95% CI: 0.185, 0.727). CONCLUSION: This study contributes to current knowledge in the treatment of HAE by indicating a statistically significant reduction of HAE attacks under lanadelumab compared to pdC1-INH i.v.